Thank you for this special presentation. That is very appreciated. Please, can you help me get the idea to calculate omega hierarchical for second order CFA?
Thank you for this video! When I adopt this approach, should I also show the CFA fit indices (considering then the phantom variables) or I can show the original CFA (with correlated errors)?
Very helpful video thank you! From looking at the literature, there seems to be different forms of omega that can be used, what is the correct terminology for this one? Also do you have a video on how to interpret the omega values? Are there specific cut-offs etc that should be considered?
Hi. There's nothing to prevent you from being able to do it. One thing though is that it gets more difficult to draw out the model with phantom variables without making an error. My personal preference is the user defined estimands. Cheers!
Oh how you are helping get through my courses. Thank you so so much!
Glad to be of help, Deborah! Good luck with your schoolwork! Cheers.
Thank you for this special presentation. That is very appreciated. Please, can you help me get the idea to calculate omega hierarchical for second order CFA?
Thank you for this video! When I adopt this approach, should I also show the CFA fit indices (considering then the phantom variables) or I can show the original CFA (with correlated errors)?
Very helpful video thank you! From looking at the literature, there seems to be different forms of omega that can be used, what is the correct terminology for this one? Also do you have a video on how to interpret the omega values? Are there specific cut-offs etc that should be considered?
!Thanks Mike Crowson
You are very welcome, Shahab!
@@mikecrowson2462 🌸🙏🏻🙏🏻
can we use the phantom approach if If have 6 factors in my model?
Hi. There's nothing to prevent you from being able to do it. One thing though is that it gets more difficult to draw out the model with phantom variables without making an error. My personal preference is the user defined estimands. Cheers!