Well, if it's valid, then a whole bunch of things will make countries fight each other, that's why we need to take things down a notch when speaking about something in the past... But who knows? Maybe he is right.... All lines that exist today are drawn because of history and the things that happened.... What matters is, another Chad Professor Terry Class and I'M IN BABYYYYYY.
You sould do the actual interview not this rewrite. Putin gave a years worth of a college histoy class from 800 AD to today in about an hour. It was a great refresher. This comedy take is a waste of time.
1:34 He does these history-themed rants literally everytime he talks publically for the past two years, it has become kind of a meme in Russia, and now after the interview, seemingly everywhere else as well
I hate to be _that_ guy, but ACKCHUALLY sword is useless against any kind of plate armor. Maces, morningstars and warhammers (historical ones, not those bloated fantasy mullets) are *extrmely* effective against any plate because they either concentrate enough force to penetrate the plate, or simply make energy bypass the plates to cause severe internal trauma.
Not to mention even if they couldn't penetrate the armor or deliver enough force to cause internal trauma despite the armor, they could still crush the armor at the joints to disable limbs (depending on the variation of plate armor) or even trap a knight in the armor.
exactly. And only the spiked variants have a chance to get stuck. Flanged mace has the advantege of both concentrating force and doesnt get stuck. HOWEVER you could flip the sword the other way and use it with mordhau
Useless is a serious overstatement... Swords have a Pointy End™ than can... get this, go through joints on armor. Sure, a dirk or poignard would be better, a bec de corbin or hammer even better but let's not overcorrect Mr Terry's silly anti-maceism.
Vlad understands history for as long as it benefits him and his world view. When we rewind past Peter the Great, all of a sudden the world history ends.
it's also a very selective interpretation of history. Historical and archeological evidence, as well as the historical narratives of non-Russian people doesn't correspond to how he believes things happened.
A mace is not a terrible weapon. It is a great weapon against a fully armoured knight, better than a sword. Swords, spears, daggers, and axes can all be deflected by armour, you have to navigate the weak points to get a kill. With a mace you just need to hit the armour hard enough so it caves in. So that the armour will kill the warrior wearing it
Not to mention swordsmithing requires a much higher level of skill than making a blunt weapon. A sword with a bad quench may be too stiff and snap easily in combat, or may be too flexible to actually be useful. Much harder to screw up putting a big heavy thing on a stick.
Another factor is that a poorly-made mace would still do the job, while a poorly made sword won't hold an edge well and will likely snap if improperly quenched. Swords in general were more expensive to make, and a bad sword is worse than no sword on the battlefield. Hard to screw up making a big heavy thing on a stick, though.
No, the museum should not return stuff from another country. It only survived this long thanks to the museum. I'm from Africa, and trust me, anything of value would be broken up, sold off, or used for something else once one regime dies and the next one takes its place...
6:40 sword-and-board is actually terrible. Besides the expense (swords are mainly only as popular as they are because you had to be nobility to afford them), you have to get right up in the face of the guy you're fighting. A polearm (even a simple spear that was the standard infantry weapon up until guns, and if you count bayonets is still used by the Marines) will keep the swordsman from ever getting close enough to do anything, to say nothing of the sword's inability to cut armor. For all those reasons and more, the correct answer is the bec de corbin, which gives you the range of a polearm with the ability to deliver blunt bonkage as well as pokey stabbage, and in multiple directions. It's a spear, a hammer, a pick, AND a 10-foot-pole all in one. Your basic untrained infantry cannon fodder can use it like a spear, but in the hands of someone who's trained with it all you can do is hope you can fire an arrow faster than he can run to within 4 yards of you.
Idk what the difference was between the real broadcast and the nick one, but apparently, the nick one was like 5 or more seconds ahead of the cbs broadcast the whole game
Honestly my overall thoughts on that interview is that its so absolutely fantastic that we have an entire war going on in Europe because one dude in Moscow is missing his ex, like a Gollum that cant let go of its empire. Hundreds of thousands of people dead because Putin doesnt think Russia is a big enough of a country, it's honestly marvelous.
it's not that Putin doesn't think Russia is big enough, it's because he believes that Russian civilization is in a terminal decline unless he intervenes to reverse the trend. I'm not validating or defending what he says, just pointing out that this is what he seems to believe.
Lol why are midwits like you even allowed to coment on complicated issues like this. This is not a marvel movie, this conflict has multiple layers of causes. If you think like this you cant be taken seriously and never should be
I found it so funny that Joe Biden actually did that after the Chiefs won, as someone from Kansas City, I thought that was quite funny to see after the game.
I have said doggo, pupper, pupperinno, doggtor, mr. waggle... I am looking for the supreme dog to call: "His dogxcellency, pupper for life, Field hound Doggery, Doggtor (insert name here), VC, DSO, MC, Lord of all the doggies of the earth and doggerinnos of the sea and Conqueror of the Bulldog Empire in the backyard and in the hydrant in particular."
Sepia is used in movies in Mexico (and other "wild west" places like Texas and NM) because it fits with the deserty vibe. Obviously, most of Mexico is not a desert, especially the populated regions, but the part that borders the US is, giving many Americans a false impression and keeping the connection between Mexico and desert in the heads of the public and this is reflected in movies. Also, Death Note is a masterpiece. You're missing out on a lot by not watching it.
When a nation asks for its stuff back from European museums the museum just adds a paragraph about how they’re asking for it back under the item description.
Dimes are smaller because they were originally made of silver while nickels were originally a cheap nickel-copper alloy. Also, Putin talking about retaking old empires got me thinking: Is the EU just the HRE 2: Electric Boogaloo?
Sepia tone is visual shorthand in films for "old". Until the 1920s, the most common film processing chemical bath included sepia, giving photos (moving or otherwise) a sepia tone. Color photography was growing in availability during the same period, along with the film industry. So color films were taking over when sepia tone was the look of all photos of the past. It was about like filming with lower red saturation today for a "retro"/70s feel to a movie.
I think typical Western interviews are too fast for typical Western news consumers' attention spans to withstand slower pace Eastern interviews. Putin even stated, that he isn't interested in making a show, only actual conversation and really wanted to explain history from point of Russian raison de'tat. I saw this as a bit of stupid and a bit of fairly good points (yes, I must admit we took some lands from Czechoslovaks in 1939, however to call that cooperation with Adolf was a stretch). Also hot take: Neither Russian nor Ukrainian identity isn't thousand years old. Kievan Rus was simply a federation of all Eastern Slavs with no distinct identity of either one of them until formation of Tsardom of Russia and development of Cossacks.
Maces were effective vs plate where as swords were less so. Bc of those lovely points, even if it didn't pierce the armor, like dropping a canned drink on a rock, it could still cave in the actual plates. They were effective bc instead of the force being applied to the length of the blade that makes contact, they were almost like a crossbow bolt that spreads out and prevents it from getting embedded and stuck in the armor. The armor protecting the person can quickly become the biggest threat on the battlefield to the person wearing it. And even when it doesn't pierce the armor, it can still generate enough force to break bones beneath the armor. Better yet, they were cheaper to produce and were still highly effective against any form of armor and didn't require years of training to be truly effective like a bow or sword. That said, blunt weapons, like bladed weapons, aren't all as effective as the others. For example, in most battles a maul would be completely worthless as you were using shield walls and fighting tightly packed together, so you couldn't take the big, powerful swings necessary to make use of a maul. Swords were great, but they weren't 30" razers. A lot of the time they'd have 1 sharp side with sections around the middle of the blade that were semi-blunted so you could grab it w/ your hand in close spaces, pry it free, etc. In a lot of ways, they were functionally a short spear where you could do some damage slashing, but they were still most effective at piercing. We can understand it would be really difficult to safely learn to fight w/ a sword, but then you have to realize one side was intentionally not sharp, a section around mid blade on both sides wasn't sharp and hitting an armored opponent w/ the sharp side of your blade would reduce the effectiveness of it to a very ineffective 2lbs steel club. They were far more complex weapons than people assume. They were doing all sorts of crazy things like having steel edges and iron cores, so the blade itself was durable and flexible, but the iron core made it very rigid and hard and stopped a lot of the vibration from hitting someone in plate armor squarely.
To be honest, it doesn't matter to him what people outside Russia believe. The situation on the ground is clear, Ukraine just lost the city of Adiivka yesterday which will no doubt raise the war support in Russia more and there are reports of pressure on every line of contact. Meanwhile, support from foreign nations is dwindling over time due to fatigue, The U.S is stuck in domestic politics and the EU support is still nowhere near the amount that they promised.
The most likely reason for the invasion as discussed around 2:30 was said by NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg who said Putin sent a treaty to NATO that said that Russia will stay out of Ukraine if NATO does not expand further east. Stoltenberg said that obviously didn’t happen and then Putin entered Ukraine.
AFTER he ALREADY invaded part of the country. "I'm allowed to invade them, but they aren't allowed to seek protection against my invasions!" That's not a legitimate reason. That's the kind of excuse you'd hear from a grade school bully trying to play the victim after getting called out for going too far or trying to pin the blame on the other kid(s) they've attacked by pointing out that they DARED to defend themselves.
17:30 You're assuming his story of "History" is factually accurate, or that the documents from his archives he gave Tucker were real. Don't forget, these are the same archives Putin said a couple months ago has documents that gives him the authority to re-take Alaska. 😂😂 It could be he's using fever dreams to influence foreign policy, not actual history. 🤣🤣Just because Putin has nukes, doesn't mean he's honest or knowledgeable.
putin - ukraine is russia. meanwhile on a map of every country britain has invaded. russians - when did britain invade russia? me - ukraine and crimea during the crimean war. russians - that doesnt count because they arent russia. and ive had this exact conversation around 30 times.
to be fair i think they landed in like the north of russia during the civil war thing but im no expert, also just a reminder the interview happened this year lol
I honestly didn't know Nickelodeon was also broadcasting the game until after the game, I wish I did watch it on there because it would've been a fun take on the game than the regular CBS broadcast.
Just so you know, CBS and Nick share the same parent company Paramount but next year the game will be on FOX, some have said it will return to at least CBS in 2028, but that's just a rumour right now.
Sir Can You Make A Video About Putin's Interview & Analyse What He Said Was True & What Is Said Was False In Historical Context,It Would Be Interesting From Your Perspective As Well.
Can someone please explain what that big gray ball on Putin‘s ear is i’m so confused is it some sort of hearing device like someone is talking into it and he’s repeating what they say or something like that
@@090giver090 That's false, Putin does know English, he has spoken it many times before in videos and interviews. He chose to speak Russian during that interview because he'll be able to speak more fluently and express his point better.
There are theories and some facts that points to the Vikings more or less created Russia. Some say that Moscow might be an old scandinavian name but I haven't seen much evidence of this but maybe.
The first season of Death Note is a pretty good cat and mouse game once you get past the silly premise. Season 2 is just a repeat of season 1 really. Subtitles rather than dubbed... obviously.
I believe that people should learn the lessons of history and not repeat the mistakes of the past, but Putin is using history as one of the reasons for war, which seems to me to discredit all historians and their activities.
Putin's point with the story was, in short, something along the lines of: "... and that is why two centers of power formed in Russian culture, Kiev and Novgorod, which was later moved to Moscow". No. I do not think that this point is valid - while yes, all the complexity explains *why* two centers of power formed, what Putin was supposed to do (in his mind) was demonstrate why the center of power at Novgorod (Moscow) was legitimate, and why the center of power in Kiev is not legitimate (in his opinion). He never, ever makes it around to that point, though - and I can only presume that the reason he doesn't make it to that point is because he doesn't actually have evidence supporting it.
I think 34 minutes was the entirety of his opening rant. Unreal lmao. Not interesting, the modern stuff, sure. His perspective is exactly what we'd think it be He claims that Poland wants parts of Ukraine for itself, and that Ukraine is also just some bordergore Austria made up as they were losing their empire so they didn't have to share a border with Russia which is a weird thing to say about your own aggression. Then claims the same about Europe/Nato and modern Ukraine. Although to some due credit, no other "world leader" has ever sat down and tried to explain any history at all even if inaccurate, so C- for just being the first modern person to attempt to do it.
I woudlnt say hes that deep knowledge of history, in most cases he just doesnt get corrected or ignored. If aint mistaken there were some small cases he got corrected by a middle schooler, and that kid got his parents called to the school just becuz he ointed out putins mistake.
Okay. Canadian history. Go. You're a teacher. You should know. Haha. I'm kidding. No one really knows that, to be honest. The putin interview was... interesting, to say the least. I was surprised when he agreed to do it. Im actually not sure whom i distrust more, putin, or carlson. They're almost 50 odd. I dont really trust either.
Oh, Mr. Terry, you're really showing ignorance of medieval combat when you say all of those are terrible weapons. Those are how you beat plate armor. Plus, there's at least one polearm there, depending on if you classify a maul as a polearm or not, and polearms beat swords. Blunt weapons were generally some of the most effective on the battlefield at the time. Also, technically combat scythes were a thing but they were more of an improvised peasant weapon. Picture a scythe, but with the blade mounted coming straight out of the end of the handle rather than at a right angle. You can keep your neapolitan ice cream, I'll take the superior spumoni (chocolate, cherry, and pistachio). Fun fact: neapolitan ice cream was invented in Prussia and actually has nothing to do with Naples. I mean, I'm firmly a millennial (born '86), and I call dogs doggos. Though, if I'm addressing them directly it's usually "lil pup" or "lil guy" regardless of breed. By the same token, all cats are babies.
He only talked about history for like 20 minutes before he let Tucker get a word in. Tucker immegiately laughed at the fact that Putin couldn't remember when he last talked to Biden. 😅 But yeah, for anyone who doesn't know why he was giving this history lesson, it was to do two things: He wanted to establish that Ukraine didn't exist as a real entity until the 90s, and he wanted to explain why there are not see supporters among the Ukr nationalists.
And to do so, he lied through his teeth. Poland sided with Germany? What? In reality, Russia sided with Hitler... Against Poland. Everyone outside of Russia and MAGAland knows this.
An unprincipled manipulator invterviews another unprincipled manipulator? No thanks. I don't watch infomercials. I'll wait for reactors to point out the highlights. Such as this one.
Didn't and won't watch the Putin interview. He tries to pervert history to ok his actions in the modern day. Him and his lackies have even started trying to quote history as a reason they need to take back Alaska. He's nothing but an egotistical megalomaniac who's convinced himself he can't fail or be wrong. He doesn't care about Russian agreements if they don't suit his ambitions. It doesn't matter who made them or how long ago, he just cares about expansion and power. Really funny how right after they found Europe's second biggest natural gas field in the donbas (2014, Shell gas) then Ukraine was suddenly Russia and they took Crimea then started to send out of uniform military to cultivate rebellion. Really REALLY funny when you consider his ownership in Russian gas that he'd suddenly want to invade. I have no respect for Putin the Pitiful.
I try to give more nunace, i haven't watched the full interview, but i got alot of the points Putin was trying to make, atleast from post cold war ideals and breakdown. I clearly do have disagreements with Putin and the Russian Regime but as Mr. Terry tried to rationalize Putin as a Russian nationalist or about telling Russian Minority perspectives well Tucker can go to these minority areas many of them have their own governments. I dont think putin is a nationalist or nationalist in how we in the western world see it, the largest nationalist party in Russia is the LPD(liberal democratic party) Putin is more or less associted with United Russia which is a centre-right big tent party.
![The Great War vs World War 2 [MEMES] | Drew Durnil | History Teacher Reacts](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hsViVsz0wxQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Is Putin's interpretation of Russian history valid?
On his other channel called Drew_IRL he made a video breaking down the interview
To answer the question no
Example being he literally said that Poland worked with Germany in 1939
In case you wanna react to some more alternate history, I highly recommend Videntis
Well, if it's valid, then a whole bunch of things will make countries fight each other, that's why we need to take things down a notch when speaking about something in the past...
But who knows? Maybe he is right.... All lines that exist today are drawn because of history and the things that happened....
What matters is, another Chad Professor Terry Class and I'M IN BABYYYYYY.
You sould do the actual interview not this rewrite. Putin gave a years worth of a college histoy class from 800 AD to today in about an hour. It was a great refresher. This comedy take is a waste of time.
Tucker: Mr Putin why did you invade Ukraine
Putin: our whole universe was in a hot dense state then nearly 14 billion years ago expansion started wait
Bazinga **laugh track**
hey just a reminder this interview happened this year lol
1:34 He does these history-themed rants literally everytime he talks publically for the past two years, it has become kind of a meme in Russia, and now after the interview, seemingly everywhere else as well
Bruh
Old man yapping
@@unextrano9775lmao
I wonder how you keep thinking that you have a majority and your government still has influence) this is definitely not the case)
@@macwizard6232 wut
I hate to be _that_ guy, but ACKCHUALLY sword is useless against any kind of plate armor. Maces, morningstars and warhammers (historical ones, not those bloated fantasy mullets) are *extrmely* effective against any plate because they either concentrate enough force to penetrate the plate, or simply make energy bypass the plates to cause severe internal trauma.
Not to mention even if they couldn't penetrate the armor or deliver enough force to cause internal trauma despite the armor, they could still crush the armor at the joints to disable limbs (depending on the variation of plate armor) or even trap a knight in the armor.
exactly. And only the spiked variants have a chance to get stuck.
Flanged mace has the advantege of both concentrating force and doesnt get stuck.
HOWEVER you could flip the sword the other way and use it with mordhau
Useless is a serious overstatement... Swords have a Pointy End™ than can... get this, go through joints on armor. Sure, a dirk or poignard would be better, a bec de corbin or hammer even better but let's not overcorrect Mr Terry's silly anti-maceism.
Bloated Fantasy Mullets is my 80s hair metal group.
yeah that ruffle my jimmy as well...those are top of the line weapon to fight against plate....
Vlad understands history for as long as it benefits him and his world view. When we rewind past Peter the Great, all of a sudden the world history ends.
it's also a very selective interpretation of history. Historical and archeological evidence, as well as the historical narratives of non-Russian people doesn't correspond to how he believes things happened.
A mace is not a terrible weapon. It is a great weapon against a fully armoured knight, better than a sword. Swords, spears, daggers, and axes can all be deflected by armour, you have to navigate the weak points to get a kill. With a mace you just need to hit the armour hard enough so it caves in. So that the armour will kill the warrior wearing it
Not to mention swordsmithing requires a much higher level of skill than making a blunt weapon. A sword with a bad quench may be too stiff and snap easily in combat, or may be too flexible to actually be useful. Much harder to screw up putting a big heavy thing on a stick.
Maces and blunt weapons were more effective agianst opponents wearing heavier armor, where swords would not be as effective.
Another factor is that a poorly-made mace would still do the job, while a poorly made sword won't hold an edge well and will likely snap if improperly quenched. Swords in general were more expensive to make, and a bad sword is worse than no sword on the battlefield. Hard to screw up making a big heavy thing on a stick, though.
6:34 from what I know, that isn't true, blunt weapons are very effective against armor, contrary to swords who are better against flesh
just a reminder the interview happened this year
Awesome! Keep up the great work professor! Love the current event coverage
"Why not just a sword and shield?" Because spears exist.
No, the museum should not return stuff from another country. It only survived this long thanks to the museum. I'm from Africa, and trust me, anything of value would be broken up, sold off, or used for something else once one regime dies and the next one takes its place...
the two tones is "global north and global south" XD
“So why did you invade Ukraine?”
“So you know the Great Mongol Genghis?”
6:40 sword-and-board is actually terrible. Besides the expense (swords are mainly only as popular as they are because you had to be nobility to afford them), you have to get right up in the face of the guy you're fighting. A polearm (even a simple spear that was the standard infantry weapon up until guns, and if you count bayonets is still used by the Marines) will keep the swordsman from ever getting close enough to do anything, to say nothing of the sword's inability to cut armor. For all those reasons and more, the correct answer is the bec de corbin, which gives you the range of a polearm with the ability to deliver blunt bonkage as well as pokey stabbage, and in multiple directions. It's a spear, a hammer, a pick, AND a 10-foot-pole all in one. Your basic untrained infantry cannon fodder can use it like a spear, but in the hands of someone who's trained with it all you can do is hope you can fire an arrow faster than he can run to within 4 yards of you.
Idk what the difference was between the real broadcast and the nick one, but apparently, the nick one was like 5 or more seconds ahead of the cbs broadcast the whole game
Honestly my overall thoughts on that interview is that its so absolutely fantastic that we have an entire war going on in Europe because one dude in Moscow is missing his ex, like a Gollum that cant let go of its empire.
Hundreds of thousands of people dead because Putin doesnt think Russia is a big enough of a country, it's honestly marvelous.
Meanwhile still and already being the largest country in the world by territory. Ooof
it's not that Putin doesn't think Russia is big enough, it's because he believes that Russian civilization is in a terminal decline unless he intervenes to reverse the trend.
I'm not validating or defending what he says, just pointing out that this is what he seems to believe.
Lol why are midwits like you even allowed to coment on complicated issues like this. This is not a marvel movie, this conflict has multiple layers of causes. If you think like this you cant be taken seriously and never should be
Has anyone ever eaten the entire carton of neopolitan ice cream in one sitting? What happened after?
A podcast called Knowledge Fight discussed this interview in great detail.
I found it so funny that Joe Biden actually did that after the Chiefs won, as someone from Kansas City, I thought that was quite funny to see after the game.
I have said doggo, pupper, pupperinno, doggtor, mr. waggle... I am looking for the supreme dog to call: "His dogxcellency, pupper for life, Field hound Doggery, Doggtor (insert name here), VC, DSO, MC, Lord of all the doggies of the earth and doggerinnos of the sea and Conqueror of the Bulldog Empire in the backyard and in the hydrant in particular."
Never thought I’d be hearing Mr Terry talk about Skyrim
I regularly refer to pupper as doggo in real life conversation
Sepia is used in movies in Mexico (and other "wild west" places like Texas and NM) because it fits with the deserty vibe. Obviously, most of Mexico is not a desert, especially the populated regions, but the part that borders the US is, giving many Americans a false impression and keeping the connection between Mexico and desert in the heads of the public and this is reflected in movies. Also, Death Note is a masterpiece. You're missing out on a lot by not watching it.
When a nation asks for its stuff back from European museums the museum just adds a paragraph about how they’re asking for it back under the item description.
Dimes are smaller because they were originally made of silver while nickels were originally a cheap nickel-copper alloy.
Also, Putin talking about retaking old empires got me thinking: Is the EU just the HRE 2: Electric Boogaloo?
I answered the blunt weapon question on facebook and FLANGED MACE MWAHAHA
There was a comic that refered to Neapolitan ice cream as “Choclatenillaberry”
Sepia tone is visual shorthand in films for "old". Until the 1920s, the most common film processing chemical bath included sepia, giving photos (moving or otherwise) a sepia tone. Color photography was growing in availability during the same period, along with the film industry. So color films were taking over when sepia tone was the look of all photos of the past. It was about like filming with lower red saturation today for a "retro"/70s feel to a movie.
My wife and I say “doggo” and “puppers” frequently.
Same, and I'm definitely a millennial.
they add that orange filter to movies when there in other counties and want to make you feel discomfortable or distant
Mr Terry is Rush in to Put in out this video 😂
I think typical Western interviews are too fast for typical Western news consumers' attention spans to withstand slower pace Eastern interviews.
Putin even stated, that he isn't interested in making a show, only actual conversation and really wanted to explain history from point of Russian raison de'tat.
I saw this as a bit of stupid and a bit of fairly good points (yes, I must admit we took some lands from Czechoslovaks in 1939, however to call that cooperation with Adolf was a stretch).
Also hot take: Neither Russian nor Ukrainian identity isn't thousand years old. Kievan Rus was simply a federation of all Eastern Slavs with no distinct identity of either one of them until formation of Tsardom of Russia and development of Cossacks.
Maces were effective vs plate where as swords were less so. Bc of those lovely points, even if it didn't pierce the armor, like dropping a canned drink on a rock, it could still cave in the actual plates. They were effective bc instead of the force being applied to the length of the blade that makes contact, they were almost like a crossbow bolt that spreads out and prevents it from getting embedded and stuck in the armor. The armor protecting the person can quickly become the biggest threat on the battlefield to the person wearing it. And even when it doesn't pierce the armor, it can still generate enough force to break bones beneath the armor. Better yet, they were cheaper to produce and were still highly effective against any form of armor and didn't require years of training to be truly effective like a bow or sword. That said, blunt weapons, like bladed weapons, aren't all as effective as the others. For example, in most battles a maul would be completely worthless as you were using shield walls and fighting tightly packed together, so you couldn't take the big, powerful swings necessary to make use of a maul.
Swords were great, but they weren't 30" razers. A lot of the time they'd have 1 sharp side with sections around the middle of the blade that were semi-blunted so you could grab it w/ your hand in close spaces, pry it free, etc. In a lot of ways, they were functionally a short spear where you could do some damage slashing, but they were still most effective at piercing. We can understand it would be really difficult to safely learn to fight w/ a sword, but then you have to realize one side was intentionally not sharp, a section around mid blade on both sides wasn't sharp and hitting an armored opponent w/ the sharp side of your blade would reduce the effectiveness of it to a very ineffective 2lbs steel club. They were far more complex weapons than people assume. They were doing all sorts of crazy things like having steel edges and iron cores, so the blade itself was durable and flexible, but the iron core made it very rigid and hard and stopped a lot of the vibration from hitting someone in plate armor squarely.
Mashed potators can be a topping, too. Never had shepherd's pie?
To be honest, it doesn't matter to him what people outside Russia believe. The situation on the ground is clear, Ukraine just lost the city of Adiivka yesterday which will no doubt raise the war support in Russia more and there are reports of pressure on every line of contact. Meanwhile, support from foreign nations is dwindling over time due to fatigue, The U.S is stuck in domestic politics and the EU support is still nowhere near the amount that they promised.
The most likely reason for the invasion as discussed around 2:30 was said by NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg who said Putin sent a treaty to NATO that said that Russia will stay out of Ukraine if NATO does not expand further east. Stoltenberg said that obviously didn’t happen and then Putin entered Ukraine.
If Ukraine wants to enter NATO then allow Ukraine to
@@jasonrichardson1999
Sure, but it's a bit late for that now that the war is happening
AFTER he ALREADY invaded part of the country. "I'm allowed to invade them, but they aren't allowed to seek protection against my invasions!" That's not a legitimate reason. That's the kind of excuse you'd hear from a grade school bully trying to play the victim after getting called out for going too far or trying to pin the blame on the other kid(s) they've attacked by pointing out that they DARED to defend themselves.
@@blackjack8043 they wanted to enter NATO in like 2014 but we kept dragging it along
@@jasonrichardson1999
I believe that's because of the Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk disputes
Ranch dressing is also from California
Do your students watch your videos? :D I'm a finn and i love your vids. And is it true that europeans used to eat mummies?
6:12 mines the bec de corbin.
3:41 I’m a Jew.
No genocide pls
Caesar salad was invented by a chef in Mexico City. It's a Mexican dish.
What school do u teach? Idk if that’s allowed just wondering
17:30 You're assuming his story of "History" is factually accurate, or that the documents from his archives he gave Tucker were real. Don't forget, these are the same archives Putin said a couple months ago has documents that gives him the authority to re-take Alaska. 😂😂 It could be he's using fever dreams to influence foreign policy, not actual history. 🤣🤣Just because Putin has nukes, doesn't mean he's honest or knowledgeable.
putin - ukraine is russia.
meanwhile on a map of every country britain has invaded.
russians - when did britain invade russia?
me - ukraine and crimea during the crimean war.
russians - that doesnt count because they arent russia.
and ive had this exact conversation around 30 times.
to be fair i think they landed in like the north of russia during the civil war thing but im no expert, also just a reminder the interview happened this year lol
I honestly didn't know Nickelodeon was also broadcasting the game until after the game, I wish I did watch it on there because it would've been a fun take on the game than the regular CBS broadcast.
Just so you know, CBS and Nick share the same parent company Paramount but next year the game will be on FOX, some have said it will return to at least CBS in 2028, but that's just a rumour right now.
Sir Can You Make A Video About Putin's Interview & Analyse What He Said Was True & What Is Said Was False In Historical Context,It Would Be Interesting From Your Perspective As Well.
Can someone please explain what that big gray ball on Putin‘s ear is i’m so confused is it some sort of hearing device like someone is talking into it and he’s repeating what they say or something like that
i think that's some auto-translate device, you should be able to see similar devices in international hearing like UN meeting or something like that
@@fdenrico9861oh ok thx I was confused because it’s so odd looking lol
Yes, that's hearing receiver. Most likely for interpreter to translate Tuker's words (Putin doesn't know english).
@@090giver090He knows.
@@090giver090 That's false, Putin does know English, he has spoken it many times before in videos and interviews. He chose to speak Russian during that interview because he'll be able to speak more fluently and express his point better.
You can tell when someome has never used a medievil blunt weapon. 😂😂😂😂
There are theories and some facts that points to the Vikings more or less created Russia. Some say that Moscow might be an old scandinavian name but I haven't seen much evidence of this but maybe.
Can't take Colgate out of your brain.
I really think you should watch videos about historical misconceptions relating to medieval weapons as you seem to repeat a lot of myths
definitely recommend death note. never too late!
The Jonathan meme is outdated. He's about 191 years old today.
The first season of Death Note is a pretty good cat and mouse game once you get past the silly premise. Season 2 is just a repeat of season 1 really. Subtitles rather than dubbed... obviously.
I believe that people should learn the lessons of history and not repeat the mistakes of the past, but Putin is using history as one of the reasons for war, which seems to me to discredit all historians and their activities.
Putin's point with the story was, in short, something along the lines of: "... and that is why two centers of power formed in Russian culture, Kiev and Novgorod, which was later moved to Moscow".
No. I do not think that this point is valid - while yes, all the complexity explains *why* two centers of power formed, what Putin was supposed to do (in his mind) was demonstrate why the center of power at Novgorod (Moscow) was legitimate, and why the center of power in Kiev is not legitimate (in his opinion). He never, ever makes it around to that point, though - and I can only presume that the reason he doesn't make it to that point is because he doesn't actually have evidence supporting it.
Yes you should for sure watch Death Note but watch it in english dub ofc.
Honestly a lot of Ukrainians speak and identify as Russian especially in the Donbas
I like Putins logic… as a British viewer it means we can go reclaim all our colonies and no one can complain 😂
italy takes england and ireland takes scotland.
That isn't Putin's logic.
He has said that like 50 times tho.@@familygash7500
DIX OUT FOR HARAMBE
Death Note is probably the best show I've ever watched, and I'm not even an anime fan.
As a Swed if Putin is rigth, then Finland is ours Im just saying
I think 34 minutes was the entirety of his opening rant.
Unreal lmao. Not interesting, the modern stuff, sure. His perspective is exactly what we'd think it be
He claims that Poland wants parts of Ukraine for itself, and that Ukraine is also just some bordergore Austria made up as they were losing their empire so they didn't have to share a border with Russia which is a weird thing to say about your own aggression. Then claims the same about Europe/Nato and modern Ukraine.
Although to some due credit, no other "world leader" has ever sat down and tried to explain any history at all even if inaccurate, so C- for just being the first modern person to attempt to do it.
I woudlnt say hes that deep knowledge of history, in most cases he just doesnt get corrected or ignored. If aint mistaken there were some small cases he got corrected by a middle schooler, and that kid got his parents called to the school just becuz he ointed out putins mistake.
You checked zero of the history, this is just a meme reaction lol.
Yes, you should watch death note.
Okay. Canadian history. Go. You're a teacher. You should know. Haha. I'm kidding. No one really knows that, to be honest. The putin interview was... interesting, to say the least. I was surprised when he agreed to do it. Im actually not sure whom i distrust more, putin, or carlson. They're almost 50 odd. I dont really trust either.
Oh boy. I strongly recommend Schwerpunkt's Ukrainian history series
Hope you were joking about maces
Oh, Mr. Terry, you're really showing ignorance of medieval combat when you say all of those are terrible weapons. Those are how you beat plate armor. Plus, there's at least one polearm there, depending on if you classify a maul as a polearm or not, and polearms beat swords. Blunt weapons were generally some of the most effective on the battlefield at the time.
Also, technically combat scythes were a thing but they were more of an improvised peasant weapon. Picture a scythe, but with the blade mounted coming straight out of the end of the handle rather than at a right angle.
You can keep your neapolitan ice cream, I'll take the superior spumoni (chocolate, cherry, and pistachio). Fun fact: neapolitan ice cream was invented in Prussia and actually has nothing to do with Naples.
I mean, I'm firmly a millennial (born '86), and I call dogs doggos. Though, if I'm addressing them directly it's usually "lil pup" or "lil guy" regardless of breed. By the same token, all cats are babies.
He only talked about history for like 20 minutes before he let Tucker get a word in. Tucker immegiately laughed at the fact that Putin couldn't remember when he last talked to Biden. 😅
But yeah, for anyone who doesn't know why he was giving this history lesson, it was to do two things: He wanted to establish that Ukraine didn't exist as a real entity until the 90s, and he wanted to explain why there are not see supporters among the Ukr nationalists.
And to do so, he lied through his teeth. Poland sided with Germany? What?
In reality, Russia sided with Hitler... Against Poland. Everyone outside of Russia and MAGAland knows this.
Death Note anime, yes!
Live action Japanese Death Note movies, yes!
Live action American Death Note movie, no.
What did any of these memes have to do with the interview? This makes no sense at all
You should watch Death Note
More like Vladimir Put-
Mashed potatoes aren't Irish guacamole, they're peruvian guacamole
An unprincipled manipulator invterviews another unprincipled manipulator? No thanks. I don't watch infomercials. I'll wait for reactors to point out the highlights. Such as this one.
Didn't and won't watch the Putin interview. He tries to pervert history to ok his actions in the modern day. Him and his lackies have even started trying to quote history as a reason they need to take back Alaska. He's nothing but an egotistical megalomaniac who's convinced himself he can't fail or be wrong.
He doesn't care about Russian agreements if they don't suit his ambitions. It doesn't matter who made them or how long ago, he just cares about expansion and power. Really funny how right after they found Europe's second biggest natural gas field in the donbas (2014, Shell gas) then Ukraine was suddenly Russia and they took Crimea then started to send out of uniform military to cultivate rebellion. Really REALLY funny when you consider his ownership in Russian gas that he'd suddenly want to invade.
I have no respect for Putin the Pitiful.
I try to give more nunace, i haven't watched the full interview, but i got alot of the points Putin was trying to make, atleast from post cold war ideals and breakdown. I clearly do have disagreements with Putin and the Russian Regime but as Mr. Terry tried to rationalize Putin as a Russian nationalist or about telling Russian Minority perspectives well Tucker can go to these minority areas many of them have their own governments. I dont think putin is a nationalist or nationalist in how we in the western world see it, the largest nationalist party in Russia is the LPD(liberal democratic party) Putin is more or less associted with United Russia which is a centre-right big tent party.
Based Putin