Stephan's Quintet: Caltech Expert Gives a Guided Tour of the New JWST Image

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024

Комментарии • 19

  • @mmnuances
    @mmnuances 2 года назад +2

    Thank you, Phillip Appleton, for the brilliant, lucid, thrilling explanation of this remarkable image and extension of human awareness. I have been a lifelong student of astronomy and astrophysics. The data from JWST is reawakening a keen passion in my mind to continue that journey of exploration. Having wonderful teachers and scientists to help the public see what they see in the data, is essential. Philip, I hope you do a lot more of these videos showing the discoveries of JWST; even about subjects other than Stephan's Quintet.
    I was very resonant with you as my mind opened to the vast intergalactic forces at play from which, ultimately, human bodies and brains that could build JWST and then be conscious of these forces and comprehend them in some way. I have to tell you that watching this video was enlivening... I have thrills and chills running up and down my spine... Thank you!

  • @ibrahimnoon
    @ibrahimnoon Год назад

    Really informative. Really helped in my research project on the JWST.

  • @thaq8.2
    @thaq8.2 Год назад

    Holy grail louse 0:083(green) in war Orion bell 🔔 0:59 💋

  • @BonesXCIV
    @BonesXCIV Год назад

    Two galaxies farming stars. Literally.

  • @bukurie6861
    @bukurie6861 2 года назад

    JWST Greatest Record images to explore Galaxies!Amuzing💥with stuff scientist and astronomus👩‍❤️‍👨👨‍❤️‍👨

  • @maryanneherrill2137
    @maryanneherrill2137 2 года назад

    Thank you Phil Appleton for your thorough explanation. These images from JWST are incredible and it is great to have your input and expertise. Thank you!

  • @carolynp1010
    @carolynp1010 2 года назад

    Isn't this image from a long time ago? So now they would be further apart?
    It's so fascinating to think of "molecules" within these giant structures.

  • @wasifkhan4595
    @wasifkhan4595 2 года назад

    Very Interesting ....

  • @jungleent1972
    @jungleent1972 8 месяцев назад

    All of these galaxies are far apart from one another and have nothing to do with each other.

  • @Vera511
    @Vera511 2 года назад

    "“Lift up your eyes to heaven and see.
    Who has created these things?
    It is the One who brings out their army by number;
    He calls them all by name.
    Because of his vast dynamic energy and his awe-inspiring power,
    Not one of them is missing." (Isaiah 40: 26)

    • @imrualquais5867
      @imrualquais5867 2 года назад

      Isaiah was referring to the few thousand stars which are visible with the naked eye - not to mention that he was mistaking them as small appliances for the earth. There are about 10 to the power of 22 stars in the universe. And most of them have no names.

    • @Vera511
      @Vera511 2 года назад

      @@imrualquais5867 Jehovah the creator of the universe knows the name of all the stars.

    • @imrualquais5867
      @imrualquais5867 2 года назад +1

      @@Vera511 Not sure the creator of the universe would bother with naming them. It is a very human thing to put names on everything. Come to think of it, Jehovah the creator of the universe is a very human thing to imagine. He is about 2500 years old, if you count the earliest records we have of this particular God. The universe is about 12 000 000 000 years old.

    • @Vera511
      @Vera511 2 года назад

      @@imrualquais5867 "“You are worthy, Jehovah our God, to receive the glory and the honor and the power, because you created all things, and because of your will they came into existence and were created.”
      (Revelation 4: 11) Jehovah created all things visible and invisible in the universe.

    • @imrualquais5867
      @imrualquais5867 2 года назад +1

      @@Vera511 And He Himself was created by humans. Amazing, isn't it?

  • @sebolddaniel
    @sebolddaniel 2 года назад

    The Hubble image is better. We really wasted our money.

    • @TheRealBozz
      @TheRealBozz 2 года назад +5

      I think you are missing the depth of field aspect of JWST.
      He can continue to "zoom in" on that star field and gain a resolution unseen until now.
      I would also wonder exactly how long they allowed the observational "aperture" to focus on this target.
      If they really allow some time, days perhaps, the resolution would be incredible.