Building a new performance with Yamaha MONTAGE M: Loading parts, managing splits and rhythm patterns

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 фев 2025

Комментарии • 22

  • @lindleypierre7441
    @lindleypierre7441 День назад +1

    Hello Kier, that's one of the best tutorial found so far. We can read that it has been well prepared to illustrate the different possibilities available. Thank you for that.
    I felt Montage M would have been difficult for me, having a Korg backgroud, but with your videos things are now easy . Great job on that

    • @KierDarby
      @KierDarby  День назад

      That’s great to read, thank you!

  • @noitnova
    @noitnova 10 дней назад +4

    Im so glad someone explain this beast.

    • @KierDarby
      @KierDarby  10 дней назад

      Glad to be of service :)

  • @jarnleikr
    @jarnleikr 10 дней назад +3

    So well explained! ❤‍🔥

  • @baseman5756
    @baseman5756 9 дней назад +1

    Nice thank you!!, love the Montage M

  • @rockgodd62
    @rockgodd62 10 дней назад +3

    Thank you Kier .
    Extremely informative and as usual , very very professional

  • @slightlytime8130
    @slightlytime8130 8 дней назад

    Thank you for another very instructive tutorial!
    There are some good videos about Montage M, but yours have a special quality: they are focused on the essentials and built in to the smallest detail.
    I would be very happy if you could also create a tutorial on the sequencer - with its three different functions (pattern, song, audio). Even if a DAW offers many more possibilities, as you have already written, an on-board sequencer is still a fine thing if you know how to use it.

  • @ericvillain3314
    @ericvillain3314 10 дней назад

    Sorry but too ennoying … I prefer So much my easyest Roland Fantom approch

    • @KierDarby
      @KierDarby  10 дней назад

      Each to their own, some will prefer the way the Fantom works - although as far as building performances/scenes is concerned, the approach is really very similar.

    • @ericvillain3314
      @ericvillain3314 10 дней назад

      @ I m sure the Montage is a beast with better acoustic sounds and others lifetime combinations but what is important for me is the worflow. On this point, Fantom is So much better.

    • @KierDarby
      @KierDarby  10 дней назад +1

      @ericvillain3314 Fantom certainly has some features that are nicely implemented

    • @trstack
      @trstack 10 дней назад +1

      I had a Fantom for 2+ weeks and returned it. I prefer the Montage M U/I and workflow. Use/play what works for you.

    • @ericvillain3314
      @ericvillain3314 10 дней назад

      @@trstack For me, 2 weeks to test the Roland Fantom seems ireally too short to have a realistic opinion …