In this clip the psychologist Dr. Carl Jung was asked if Hitler was a father figure, Jung reply giving the psychological significance of the figure of Hitler
P.S. Jung is not condoning Hitler, he is just explaining how the Germans perceived him from a subconscious level, also this is everything he said about Hitler in this interview. Jung was talking about archetypes then out of nowhere the interviewer asked this question, and right after this clip they changed the topic.
Yes of corse . I understood from start it was idea of collective subconciouss. But , even father figures are saviors as symbol for his children , so it is kind of simmilar. Difference is on how broad is the view
I’m seeing a rise in factual comments and rational interpretations of things on social media and I just want to say that is great. This helps to prevent mindless arguments and displays of aggression in the comments as well as helps to perpetuate facts not fiction.
In the 30s Jung was the editor for a journal supporting hitler and white supremacy. He only dropped his public support after the Nazi downfall. He believed in the purity of the German race and a religion based on German mythology.
Very complicated and his analysis is usually very thorough expressing concepts and using examples. Ie: his interviewer could be unrehearsed or the publication. Or there wasn’t enough tape. Lol
That is the beauty of psychoanalysis. There is no need to talk about the evils or values of a person...merely boiling them down and analyzing them. Their archetypes, their functions, how they have affected other people...what they mean to other people It isn't about being objective as much as it is taking a completely different stance...one of understanding rather than one of condemnation You can talk all day about why Hitler was evil, but many don't want to talk about what made him that way...the perfect storm of perception
Lust for power. I'm no shrink but post WW1 was a perfect storm for Hitler to rise to power. Germany was all about pride which we all know is the root of all evil. The vast majority of Germans believed they were on the right side and in way you cant blame them. No I'm not justifying what they did my grandfathers family fled Poland after the war (not Jewish just starving and homeless).
He is not calling hitler a hero in his opinion. He is explaining the archetype that Hitler fell under, hitler tried to be a hero, And the Germans at the time perceived him as one. If you don’t know anything about Jung or his theories, probably best to do abit of reading before getting your panties in a twist.
@@ProtoIndoEuropean88 No, not a hero, a "hero figure" ... pretending to be a hero. "I alone can fix this". "I alone will restore our former (fictitious) glory. He is saying Hitler was a fake.
@ProtoIndoEuropean88 grow up, imagine judging one of the most intelligent famous psychologist based on a 20 second clip not showing the full context 🤓
Jung is the opposite of an objective man. Bro said it's complicated . This means the issue of Hitler is subjective and not objective. What the hell are you talking about? Jung was a deep thinker who had no first principle to give objective claims this is why all his solutions are " it's complicated" Better answer than many but still not an objective answer .
Calling Jung objective is misleading. He focuses on the "spirit" which is metaphysical. There is no proof for the spirit. No science of fact. He uses peoples reliance on the metaphysical to justify its existence but that isnt logical.
Hitler was possessed (psychologically) by an ancient German mythic figure known as Wotan. Jung describes this in his essay "Wotan" after having met Hitler. Fun fact: Jung meets Hitler and the next day decides to leave Germany instantly, he sees the possession and is terrified of what will come of this
Hitler himself once said to Mussolini "I think I am possessed. Not by a demon, but by the spirit of a great aryan man from pre-history." Mussolini was puzzled and became uneasy at that statement. There was also a painting of Wotan in the year of Hitler's birth where it shows Wotan who also resembles Hitler riding into battle. Jung believed it was a product of the collective unconcious as he also had visions of a great world war in 1913 before WW1.
Wotan btw is the same entity as wodan/wutan/odin etc. In the germanic mythology. In the area of modern germany they called him wotan for example while in scandinavia they called him odin and there are small local differences obviously but in the overreaching germanic mythology its the same entitiy. If i remeber correct tho one of the lical differences was that wotan was more seen as a warrior god then odin
This is a true scientist of the mind. He was just speaking of the perspective of the German people during a desperate time for Germany. You couldn't have convinced them otherwise. They thought he was the answer to their failures. I wonder if this sounds familiar to anyone here? All throughout history desperate people have looked to just another grandiose figure that ends in disaster.
@drew67gmdrm72 No where near trump. Leftest Democrats will preferred trunk as suppose as to what’s coming after trump if he dose not win or gets whacked. Trump is a nice guy. To what will come out of the collapsing of society.
I remember people saying about Obama being their LORD and saviour. We all know he's running this Biden administration in the background. It's not going to end well for us.
What humility for a genuine genius. To say no no I couldn’t possibly, it’s to complicated. And then to speak about the hero figure archetype that he was rather than the monster we all perceive Hitler to be is brilliant. It’s easy to see that he thinks outside the box of normal thinking. Off topic but I am a recovered addict and a huge part of my recovery came from listening to this man and reading books he wrote. The shadow work he suggests is incredible for healing trauma. I do it often, take a real look at my shadow self regularly. But when I first did it I had trouble doing it without guilt and shame and I nearly ended my life because of it. Needles to say I was an IV drug user for a reason, childhood trauma. And I repeated most of that trauma all of my life. I hurt many people in the process and once I came to a place of understanding that I had to change, I had to heal my trauma and stop hurting people I looked to psychology as well as spirituality. So to look at the horrible things that I have done, my god it was difficult to keep moving forward without guilt and shame. I’m being very honest when I say suicide was on my mind more than once during this process. That is why many people do not do the shadow work, it’s to difficult to look inward when you have been not such a good person. But who looks outside dreams and who looks inside awakes. It’s crucial to do the shadow work. Still saving and changing lives even after death. That is a hero. Thank you Mr. Jung.
Jung said to embrace the Shadow, bring it to light and integrate it, become aware of it. We all have that dark side. Some more than others. The best we can do is work with it
@@Crookedchurch you’re welcome and thank you very much. It was an extremely difficult thing to do but I am so thankful that I became aware of the problem and made a choice to change. My life isn’t always easy but now I love life and I do my best to be as kind and understanding to everyone. Definitely not judgmental to other peoples struggles or downfalls since I know I had many myself. What a beautiful thing to go from fractured and broken to becoming whole. That’s a lifelong journey that I’m grateful to be on. I hope by sharing my story often it will help others in a similar situation to know that it is very possible to have a drastic change in their lives. And maybe to help others not to view the broken addicts and homeless in a negative way. They didn’t get there because their childhoods were ok. And you can’t blame a child who had no choice. But as an adult, stop being the victim and blaming and go deep into your mi d and your soul and find your true self. It’s in there
Seriously. The Bolsheviks changed world for worse. I'm so happy and grateful the people we "liberated" from camps now promote homosexuality, pornography, diversity and migrant sheltering in the west. I'm so thankful Germany was destroyed. I'm so thankful we have all of this degenerate behavior in the youth. Love is love YAY!!!!! I NEED TO ESCAPE THIS HELLSCAPE BRUH SEND RAW MILK PLS
Yup. He respected Jws so much he wanted to be one , it's complicated, liberal subjective answer . He knows Jws are also stubborn from his many years of psychological anyslisis and kabbalah. There happy ? @@UNFORGIVABLExGAMING
Probably the most apt description of Adolf Hitler. No moral grandstanding, morality and what he did or didn't do is entirely irrelevant. This is purely about the psychology of the man, and the archetype he was, or perhaps what he was astrologically born into.
He was not a psychiatrist, he was a psychoanalyst. The former uses medication and other treatments to deal with mental illness; the latter uses analysis to help patients understand the source of psychological complexes.
You should look Jung up. I haven’t given up on believing there’s more good than weird, but a lot of his stuff was downright cooky. But I keep finding almost as much stuff that just seems genius, too
@@laurentcamara6782 You have an unbalanced view of things. In older times psychiatry and psychology were not seperated. What you're defining as a psychiatrist is the modern type after psychiatric drugs were born, they began to seperate. And mental DISORDERS are not illnesses. You need to have a broader spectrum of facts considering their time and place, not just mumble generic points here and there thinking they're absolute truths..
All bad guys even in movies think they’re the hero in their story. The heroes in myths bring upon change to stagnating order. Hero in the sense that Jung is mentioning is not what we typically think of a hero but as an archetype within Jung’s framework.
@@vibratorpinata When discussing such footage, it's often important to give detailed statements regarding possible interpretations - and especially regarding now deceased people, who used everyday words in a specific, well-defined sense
@@vibratorpinataare you serious? You are saying that a savior is merely an idea? An aspirration? There is no physical representation of a savior in our reality? I hope you are wrong because that would be hell
@@moma8518that’s projection of your lack of ability to comprehend what he’s saying. Just because you lack comprehension skills doesn’t mean he “doesn’t say much”. You’re just dense.
what are you talking about? Jung literally was one of the first psychologists to develop a functional theory about the psychological interplay between masculine and feminine gender archetypes in the mind, it was almost the backbone of his system(the anima and animus), the idea that family and society codes in arbitrary ideas of acceptable and unacceptable behavior in social and gender roles, spoke at length about the need for all people to reconcile the two, and actively encouraged uncovering those things society forces you to repress in the jungian "Shadow" in order to understand and integrate these denied aspects of self. Jungian concepts are still the backbone of multiple branches of psychological therapy/study, and his ideas on gender could be seen as a precursor to the way the current psychological and medical community, as well as the pro-feminist, pro-lgbtq, pro-drag scene views gender today. in one sentence, you demonstrate you have little to no concept of jung's work by lamenting the loss of "real men", when Jung advocated reconciling the contrary and binary concepts within your psyche, including gender, programmed into you by culture, as part of his overall system. he literally advised that men should reconnect with their repressed feminine side, and vice versa for women. you're talking about missing "real men" while praising the man who essentially advised the psychological destruction of that concept as a part of the bedrock of his work. if this was meant to be some weird masculinity flex, you chose the worst person to try to center it around. if this is some lament of men of old being more intellectual, again you miss the point by framing this as a trait of "real" men and not seeing that the entire concept of what we as a society consider and separate as "Male"/"Female" traits is an arbitrary psycho-social division in the first place. i really can't fathom what you're gesturing at with this.
Yes, he was describing alchemical realization as useful in some instances in overcoming duality. That however did not mean, chemically castrating children or proposing irreversible surgery without parental consent.
@@sachmo8 Jung made no comment left or right on the matter, as it was outside his area of expertise and focus. Jung was focused on mapping out and understanding the mind to better treat it through psychoanalysis and therapy, as opposed to drug regiments, lobotomies, shock therapy, and other more...let's say "detrimental"... approaches of his day. what can be inferred from his work only supports the approach, since Jung as well as other contemporaries had already well established the relation between body and self, person and persona, and demonstrated the direct positive and negative effects of one on the other and vice versa. but while i can make an argument from inferrence showing his philosophy supports the idea in spirit, the plain fact is, this wasn't Jung's area of expertise, and his general focus was on treatment of the mind through non medical/surgical means via unpacking and understanding the way the mind works, and therefore it was not even tangential to his focus. as to your allusion to sex change operations and kids: Good thing that isn't happening then, since children don't get sex change surgery, they are put on temporary/reversible puberty blockers until they are old enough to go through with the surgery to make the transition easier, at which point they would start taking the gender appropriate drug(testosterone/estrogen) and begin arranging/preparing for the surgery, during which time they will likely have started dressing and identifying as the "new" gender beforehand. The entire process takes years and involves extensive psychological therapy evaluations and the only way in which minors are put on blockers without parental consent is exigent circumstances where the parent already has no legal control due to issues like the child being legally emancipated. In the event they either decide to stop taking the blockers or are forced to stop taking them due to financial, legal, or social reasons, that person will experience puberty at that time. the only shortcomings of a late puberty are miniscule reductions in aesthetic things like how easy it is to grow a beard, or how deep your voice is, missing out on that last 1/2 inch of growth spurt, etc. We've had puberty blockers since at least the early to mid 70's and have used them for other non-gender affirming reasons in medicine for decades, they are well studied and proven both safe and effective. none of this is "new" or "controversial" ground, this field of research and medicine is old enough that it was around for the 3rd Reich to burn en masse. but by all means, continue engaging in your paranoid delusional fantasy to justify your already preheld prejudices against an entire group you have no vested interest in, and a field of medical advancement that's been around for literally over a century and who's emotional and psychological benefits have been studied and proven(first US sex change was in 1917. additionally, by 1952, LIFE magazine's cover was titled "Ex-GI Becomes Blonde Beauty" and featured Christine Jorgensen, born as George, a WWII army veteran who transitioned in 1950). And continue ignoring the fact that we already have rather solid regulatory protections across the board preventing operational and medical procedures on minors without informed consent of both patient and legal guardian. so the point you pretend to be your focus(protecc the children) is mute from the start, and just being used to obfuscate an attack on the general practice et al, in lieu of having an actual valid argument. seriously, it's not about "protecting the kids", that's just an appeal to emotion fallacy used as the conservative's last bastion against reason. that's always the hollow excuse: - when they tried to say Elvis' swinging hips were going to corrupt young impressionable minds. - when they tried to say rock and roll was satanic and was going to brainwash your children with reverse messages - when they tried to say Dungeons & Dragons was a "guide to witchcraft and the occult" that would destroy your children - when they tried to say that all gay people were kiddie diddling perverts - when they tried to claim rap music was all satanic illuminati members - when they said videogames were murder simulators and pokemon was demonic - when they tried to say that all democrats were in a satanic blood drinking kiddie diddler cult The arguments get more and more utterly ridiculous as the years go by, and every time, when it turns out there ISN'T a Commie spy hiding in your rose bushes, and the blacks or immigrants or the gays or the trans people aren't the bogeyman diddling your kids because it's your pastor or your brother-in-law, and the board games aren't teaching your children the ancient magic of the Heptameron, and the games and the music aren't to blame and it's JUST bad parenting and social alienation, the last hollow and empty cry is always the voice of Maude Flanders from The Simpsons shouting, "But WHY won't ANYONE think of the CHILDREN?!?!". The Simpsons literally created a character 34 YEARS ago JUST for making fun of this one rhetorical behavior and the people who most often resort to it, it's old and tired and everyone knows the deal. it isn't in the service of defending or protecting america's youth, it's using america's youth as a rhetorical shield to hide behind, nothing more. bottom line, the mountains of research data and longterm studies we have from decades of research speaks in favor of the option, children are not "at risk" and there are already existing medical regulatory frameworks to further ensure that. so if some duderino wants to be a dudette, let him. Why do I care? Elon Musk wants to put a computer chip in our brains so he can send push notifications from his twitter telling us to update our software directly into our frontal lobe, my neighbor has an AI assistant that's always listening and controls his whole house, and the NYPD are buying gunmounted robotic dogs. i'm gonna have an ethernet port on the back of my neck, but i'm supposed to be worried about a guy wanting fake boobs? not exactly my first, second, third, or fourth priorities in this neo-dystopian hellscape, mate.
I love when someone talking without bias like this. It's annoying when people shut me off when I tried to speak using different perspective. People tend to only listen to what they wanted to hear.
I'm not advocating Hitler, but we could learn from his actions. What history taught you, look at them with non-bias eyes, and you might even learn the qualities in which could enhance your lives.
I don't think you need to explain what he means. Terminology of science does not contradict common sense. It is only nowadays trendy to interpret things into what we want to hear.
The only myth here are the lies They feed us. That fellow was on time Life magazine cover twice by the way. And this one here is just a mere page Turner.
@@dallasfurnish3031 The reason is that they cant handle the truth and no other narrative around WW2 is allowed, it would make people ask uncomfortable questions but you cant kill the truth.
@@llumiinati the documentary has been made illegal and banned in multiple countries. Instead of disagreeing with me how about you look up what I said to verify it.
How many idiots are going to see this snippet and take it out of the full context. Jung was describing Adolph as he was to the German people who followed him, not as an outsider would see him.
@@eleesss3Peterson covers Jung a lot but doesn't seem to know how to apply Jung's archetypes to the Bible. Because Peterson reads the Bible quite literally to find his morals, which he apparently would not have without the Bible.
This is similar to the phenomenon of sebastianism in Brazil. It is notable that the country's most notable (not necessarily the "best") leaders were populists and perceived as a godsend. As saviors.
No, we wouldn't. His ideology depended on pseudologic and pseudoscience, which would've obviously come to light eventually. We would not worship him. We'd despise him as any people under a dictatorship would despise their supreme leader.
Jung was an early member of the NSDAP & saw the movement as a way of returning to a purer, more organic way of life. The Reich also financially secured Jung’s psychology work in a German clinic. Naturally, he later modified his original thoughts after the war.
the archetype of the hero is not necessarily good. He's just relating his perspective on Hitler as a psychological archetype, as the Germanic figure of Wotan. Who was also a chaotic and destructive hero. Sometimes someone's savior ends up being a destructor.
That was in the video, an import detail you missed. "A hero, in the German myth." And @radical I think you're misunderstanding the context in which "myth" was used here.
Was this interview conducted after the Jwsh committee commissioned the Frankfurt school to write “The Authoritarian Personality” which was an assault against Western Christian Family structure?
I listened to speeches that Hitler gave and he was saying to the German people everything any group of people would want to hear that you are the best the strongest the smartest the bravest that we're going to resurrect the German people to the position they deserve as hardworking industrious people. Just put yourself in their position and think of a leader who would say this about your people. Also remember not every German was a Nazi and many fought against them to the death and of their own family. Many Germans that were not Jews died in the concentration camps. The Nazis killed many elderly, disabled, mentally ill and diseased and also homosexuals which was a crime in much of the world during those days. It is of note that more people were killed by far under communism and only recently have people really started to make mention of this. Approximately 100 million people died under communism whereas maybe 1/5th or 20% died under Nazism.
@@schoschta4813 why don't you do some research instead of relying on listening to somebody's propaganda indoctrinating you and don't just read their info.
It´s really easy to twist the total meaning about a real complex reality with a simple short film jajaj. A hero in "the German myth"... Jung later explains his own moral dejection regarding totalitarianism... Jung was an extrange humanist, a clairvoyant wise man who helped us get to know deep pneuma phenomena from unconcious phsyque -vers l´elan vital et ses mysteres cachés- where mind, culture and spirit becomes sorts of one single living corpus in history
The question is..."why did HumanNature decide to use This clip and that particular edited piece?? The clip could have easily been longer to avoid any confusion...? Hnmmm, None of us are exempt.
A couple of squeezes...oh no.. those look truly terrifying for somebody who has a slight claustrophobia. 😮 Not that being inside of a deep underwater cave wouldn't be enough...but to additionally have to squeeze yourself through tiny openings... frightening.
@@Sapientia-in-senectutedefinitely not putting a stranglehold on a nation's economy and push them to the edge and force them to push back and start a war 😊
Jung had an opportunity to explain in the way he explains life but he didn't. I think because there was a part of him that loved Hitler. That's why he is stuttering and messing his words.
Always thought Jung was far superior to Freud some disagree,for them to much mystasiciam, for others, the Buddhist, have come the closest to figuring it all out
Jung understands the magical aspect of existence and the influence it has on the programming of individuals! The Egyptians term this the ka - the soul in a living body and the ba - the soul in death! Jung makes it practically tangible using his concept of unconscious and conscious personality! This is why he says it's impossible to explain fully how he influenced the German people using mythos. This is because the unconscious part of the explanation cannot be explained because it's unconscious but consciously present operating in a get unknown dimension.
"Hero Figures are far more Important than Fathers" hits diffrent seriously spoken by an grounded & wise old man, especially in the Internet Age. The amount of young man Andrew Tate has saved through his "roll" as Top G, must have equalize some millions of fathers taking the one way ticket to the cigarette machine🏃♂️💨
How i would explain Hitler and answer this question is simple: Hitler adhered to Excorcism, while The Father was Perfect Enough for Intercession. Intercession disarms the beast whilst remaining peaceful in delivering his Heart. In this, the Life is respected more. Hitler had no regard for human life. He is Seen as Magic Hero in the sense that he manipulated others to get to that point of "Hero".
Your comment perfectly illustrates the dangers of considering things from a purely "intellectual" perspective, and taking out the MORALITY.... Hitler may or may not have been "deranged", but he WAS a very EVIL person....along with the Nazi ideology he espoused....
... Oh, no, I could never begin to explain Hitler and then proceedes to perfectly sum up and explain him exactly as he was viewed during his time in power ...
If the "hero" is more important than "any father", would this not also pertain too "god the father"? Is Achilles the hero more important than Zevs the "allfather"? I am genuinely curious.
well, i think zeus and other god images are not just father figures, they are also hero/wizard and so on... but the fact is people can associate with achilles and other more worldy heros much more than all powerful characters
Although he was chiefly referring to communism in The Undiscovered Self, it doesn’t leave much room to worry that Jung would compliment Hitler. He discusses a sort of societal mental illness that goes hand in hand with the State supplanting the reason and morality of the individual and how the people best suited to rise to the top in that situation are those who already were mentally ill as individuals. It’s frightening how well it applies to almost any modern political movement that I am familiar with actually.
“What is the significance of that split, symbolized by the ‘Iron Curtain,’ which divides humanity into two halves? What will become of our civilization, and of man himself, if the hydrogen bombs begin to go off, or if the spiritual and moral darkness of State absolutism should spread over Europe?” He also felt the need to add footnotes addressing the Hungarian revolution.
Hitler was portraying himself as a hero figure, which he was for many of his followers at that time. That does not mean that Hitler was a Hero (!) People in the comments don‘t really get it. But what am I expecting under a RUclips Short Video..
People are way too easily moved by political "saviors." Jung was a prophet in a very real sense; his teachings should be required education. Brilliant man.
Looking back on ww2 as a germanic person at the times we live in. Its really hard to not become neonazi. Its all true what he said and its really hard to proof it wronge.
Anyone who knows of Carl's work would know that he is NOT complimenting the old dictator. I feel like he is mocking his inner conscience and status in his society at the time
P.S. Jung is not condoning Hitler, he is just explaining how the Germans perceived him from a subconscious level, also this is everything he said about Hitler in this interview. Jung was talking about archetypes then out of nowhere the interviewer asked this question, and right after this clip they changed the topic.
Yes of corse . I understood from start it was idea of collective subconciouss. But , even father figures are saviors as symbol for his children , so it is kind of simmilar. Difference is on how broad is the view
bugman understanding of history
I’m seeing a rise in factual comments and rational interpretations of things on social media and I just want to say that is great. This helps to prevent mindless arguments and displays of aggression in the comments as well as helps to perpetuate facts not fiction.
@@farseervisionsno, he's speaking for the context 🙄
In the 30s Jung was the editor for a journal supporting hitler and white supremacy. He only dropped his public support after the Nazi downfall. He believed in the purity of the German race and a religion based on German mythology.
When Jung says it's complicated it's impossible.
Not really
If you read jung you would know it is
It's possible
i understand what you say ..because I have heard about his difficult textured books
Very complicated and his analysis is usually very thorough expressing concepts and using examples. Ie: his interviewer could be unrehearsed or the publication. Or there wasn’t enough tape. Lol
Psychology should be taught in public schools. Society suffers an imbalance from a lack of this.
Modern psychology is wole garbage now anyway.
Couldn't agree more!
In Denmark it is
Not sure I understand what ya mean? East coast US and I took psychology in school. (Prior to as well as during college.)
@@UNFORGIVABLExGAMING well in my country it isn't, and I am sure it is not the only place where people are clueless about psychology
I'm sure a lot of people are misunderstanding what was said here 😂
this is why I wrote a comment that gives more context
Don't worry. If somebody like you managed to figure it out, I'm sure that evrybody can! ;))
because they don't know the Hero is a household term
That is the beauty of psychoanalysis. There is no need to talk about the evils or values of a person...merely boiling them down and analyzing them. Their archetypes, their functions, how they have affected other people...what they mean to other people
It isn't about being objective as much as it is taking a completely different stance...one of understanding rather than one of condemnation
You can talk all day about why Hitler was evil, but many don't want to talk about what made him that way...the perfect storm of perception
Lust for power. I'm no shrink but post WW1 was a perfect storm for Hitler to rise to power. Germany was all about pride which we all know is the root of all evil. The vast majority of Germans believed they were on the right side and in way you cant blame them. No I'm not justifying what they did my grandfathers family fled Poland after the war (not Jewish just starving and homeless).
What are you on about @@IFoundWaldoOnce
Jordan Peterson does a great job with this
@@seanfeeley8412Or you can think for yourself lol
What do you think about Adolf Hitler and who was he to the German public during his career?
@@mkkk1058 he almost saved us from interest rates.
He is not calling hitler a hero in his opinion. He is explaining the archetype that Hitler fell under, hitler tried to be a hero, And the Germans at the time perceived him as one. If you don’t know anything about Jung or his theories, probably best to do abit of reading before getting your panties in a twist.
nice cope bro, Jung clearly admired Hitler as shown here.
@@ProtoIndoEuropean88 No, not a hero, a "hero figure" ... pretending to be a hero. "I alone can fix this". "I alone will restore our former (fictitious) glory. He is saying Hitler was a fake.
He isn’t but I am
@ProtoIndoEuropean88 grow up, imagine judging one of the most intelligent famous psychologist based on a 20 second clip not showing the full context 🤓
Freud accused Jung of antisemitism so there's that too
A very objective man
Objectivity is the mark of a true Scientist, wouldn't you say?
looks like a jew ... is he jewish?
@@Itz_KLONOPINI'd say so.. but i ain't no scientist lol
Jung is the opposite of an objective man. Bro said it's complicated . This means the issue of Hitler is subjective and not objective. What the hell are you talking about?
Jung was a deep thinker who had no first principle to give objective claims this is why all his solutions are " it's complicated"
Better answer than many but still not an objective answer .
Calling Jung objective is misleading.
He focuses on the "spirit" which is metaphysical. There is no proof for the spirit. No science of fact. He uses peoples reliance on the metaphysical to justify its existence but that isnt logical.
Hitler was possessed (psychologically) by an ancient German mythic figure known as Wotan. Jung describes this in his essay "Wotan" after having met Hitler. Fun fact: Jung meets Hitler and the next day decides to leave Germany instantly, he sees the possession and is terrified of what will come of this
holy shit thats interesting
Hitler himself once said to Mussolini "I think I am possessed. Not by a demon, but by the spirit of a great aryan man from pre-history." Mussolini was puzzled and became uneasy at that statement. There was also a painting of Wotan in the year of Hitler's birth where it shows Wotan who also resembles Hitler riding into battle. Jung believed it was a product of the collective unconcious as he also had visions of a great world war in 1913 before WW1.
Wotan btw is the same entity as wodan/wutan/odin etc. In the germanic mythology. In the area of modern germany they called him wotan for example while in scandinavia they called him odin and there are small local differences obviously but in the overreaching germanic mythology its the same entitiy. If i remeber correct tho one of the lical differences was that wotan was more seen as a warrior god then odin
This is a true scientist of the mind. He was just speaking of the perspective of the German people during a desperate time for Germany. You couldn't have convinced them otherwise. They thought he was the answer to their failures. I wonder if this sounds familiar to anyone here? All throughout history desperate people have looked to just another grandiose figure that ends in disaster.
Anyone say Trump 😅
@drew67gmdrm72
No where near trump. Leftest Democrats will preferred trunk as suppose as to what’s coming after trump if he dose not win or gets whacked.
Trump is a nice guy. To what will come out of the collapsing of society.
The current Ethiopian prime minister
Not all Germans believed in Hitler. Some saw right through him. Same today with trumpers. They would have believed in Hitler too
I remember people saying about Obama being their LORD and saviour.
We all know he's running this Biden administration in the background.
It's not going to end well for us.
Intellectual Integrity was Carl Jungs middle name.
What humility for a genuine genius. To say no no I couldn’t possibly, it’s to complicated. And then to speak about the hero figure archetype that he was rather than the monster we all perceive Hitler to be is brilliant. It’s easy to see that he thinks outside the box of normal thinking. Off topic but I am a recovered addict and a huge part of my recovery came from listening to this man and reading books he wrote. The shadow work he suggests is incredible for healing trauma. I do it often, take a real look at my shadow self regularly. But when I first did it I had trouble doing it without guilt and shame and I nearly ended my life because of it. Needles to say I was an IV drug user for a reason, childhood trauma. And I repeated most of that trauma all of my life. I hurt many people in the process and once I came to a place of understanding that I had to change, I had to heal my trauma and stop hurting people I looked to psychology as well as spirituality. So to look at the horrible things that I have done, my god it was difficult to keep moving forward without guilt and shame. I’m being very honest when I say suicide was on my mind more than once during this process. That is why many people do not do the shadow work, it’s to difficult to look inward when you have been not such a good person. But who looks outside dreams and who looks inside awakes. It’s crucial to do the shadow work. Still saving and changing lives even after death. That is a hero. Thank you Mr. Jung.
Jung said to embrace the Shadow, bring it to light and integrate it, become aware of it. We all have that dark side. Some more than others. The best we can do is work with it
@@arriuscalpurniuspiso you bet, I agree with it too. It’s the only way to become whole. And that is the goal after all.
Thankyou for sharing this Chris I hope your life is now plentiful and peaceful. Takes alot of bravery to do what you did I salute you 🙏
@@Crookedchurch you’re welcome and thank you very much. It was an extremely difficult thing to do but I am so thankful that I became aware of the problem and made a choice to change. My life isn’t always easy but now I love life and I do my best to be as kind and understanding to everyone. Definitely not judgmental to other peoples struggles or downfalls since I know I had many myself. What a beautiful thing to go from fractured and broken to becoming whole. That’s a lifelong journey that I’m grateful to be on. I hope by sharing my story often it will help others in a similar situation to know that it is very possible to have a drastic change in their lives. And maybe to help others not to view the broken addicts and homeless in a negative way. They didn’t get there because their childhoods were ok. And you can’t blame a child who had no choice. But as an adult, stop being the victim and blaming and go deep into your mi d and your soul and find your true self. It’s in there
Most smart people and scientists are humble
The opinion about time magazine man of the year 1938 is a scale of intelligence
Seriously.
The Bolsheviks changed world for worse. I'm so happy and grateful the people we "liberated" from camps now promote homosexuality, pornography, diversity and migrant sheltering in the west. I'm so thankful Germany was destroyed. I'm so thankful we have all of this degenerate behavior in the youth. Love is love YAY!!!!!
I NEED TO ESCAPE THIS HELLSCAPE BRUH SEND RAW MILK PLS
He is clearly commenting on the German mythos around Hitler, not saying he was literally a hero.
Absolutely. Only a simpleton would think he was condoning him.
Yep, maybe not a simpleton but somebody who does not really listen.
@eeviray yes, not necessarily a simpleton. But those who don't listen carefully are often times simpletons.
@@morghe321you’re a pseudo-intellectual lmao history was written by the winners
He sure was on right track
The truth will set you free
It’s got that voice that you just wanna listen to it all day
Jung's stressing that it was "too complicated" says it all - about Jung.
Care to explain it in a simple way then?
Yup. He respected Jws so much he wanted to be one , it's complicated, liberal subjective answer . He knows Jws are also stubborn from his many years of psychological anyslisis and kabbalah. There happy ? @@UNFORGIVABLExGAMING
What is something is being all about someone? Does he mean it is personal or something he can’t achieve in explaining?
shut up, jew.
Gee you're a nasty bit of work.
Probably the most apt description of Adolf Hitler. No moral grandstanding, morality and what he did or didn't do is entirely irrelevant. This is purely about the psychology of the man, and the archetype he was, or perhaps what he was astrologically born into.
This guy was a very good psychiatrist seem to have no apparent biases
He was not a psychiatrist, he was a psychoanalyst. The former uses medication and other treatments to deal with mental illness; the latter uses analysis to help patients understand the source of psychological complexes.
@@laurentcamara6782 psychologist
@@laurentcamara6782 he was both
You should look Jung up. I haven’t given up on believing there’s more good than weird, but a lot of his stuff was downright cooky. But I keep finding almost as much stuff that just seems genius, too
@@laurentcamara6782 You have an unbalanced view of things. In older times psychiatry and psychology were not seperated. What you're defining as a psychiatrist is the modern type after psychiatric drugs were born, they began to seperate. And mental DISORDERS are not illnesses. You need to have a broader spectrum of facts considering their time and place, not just mumble generic points here and there thinking they're absolute truths..
I think he says "in this light", not "in this life".
All bad guys even in movies think they’re the hero in their story. The heroes in myths bring upon change to stagnating order. Hero in the sense that Jung is mentioning is not what we typically think of a hero but as an archetype within Jung’s framework.
Of course! Just like a saviour is really just a very mythical, theoretical, a figure of speech, really. Now, move along!
@@vibratorpinata When discussing such footage, it's often important to give detailed statements regarding possible interpretations - and especially regarding now deceased people, who used everyday words in a specific, well-defined sense
Actually he is speaking to the hero archetype as we understand it today. However, in the German ZEITGEIST.
@@vibratorpinataare you serious? You are saying that a savior is merely an idea? An aspirration? There is no physical representation of a savior in our reality? I hope you are wrong because that would be hell
@@vibratorpinata Jung did not politically support Hitler, if that's what you're insinuating lol
Not the angle I was expecting after he said it was complicated 😂
Jung was such a brilliant human. He was able to experience spiritual concepts and science.
Carl was an intellectual
It's time we just started telling the truth about it all
God I fuking love Jung.
Freud was not even close to Jung greatness...
Freud helped the USA to produce anti-German Propaganda, in other words how to influence the masses, with his nephew Edward Bernays.@@Alfakkin
I don’t, he’s needlessly confusing and doesn’t say all that much
@@moma8518that’s projection of your lack of ability to comprehend what he’s saying. Just because you lack comprehension skills doesn’t mean he “doesn’t say much”. You’re just dense.
@@moma8518 Not confusing to those who have read his books
Real men, real ideas, real interviews. God I miss men! Real men!
what are you talking about?
Jung literally was one of the first psychologists to develop a functional theory about the psychological interplay between masculine and feminine gender archetypes in the mind, it was almost the backbone of his system(the anima and animus), the idea that family and society codes in arbitrary ideas of acceptable and unacceptable behavior in social and gender roles, spoke at length about the need for all people to reconcile the two, and actively encouraged uncovering those things society forces you to repress in the jungian "Shadow" in order to understand and integrate these denied aspects of self. Jungian concepts are still the backbone of multiple branches of psychological therapy/study, and his ideas on gender could be seen as a precursor to the way the current psychological and medical community, as well as the pro-feminist, pro-lgbtq, pro-drag scene views gender today.
in one sentence, you demonstrate you have little to no concept of jung's work by lamenting the loss of "real men", when Jung advocated reconciling the contrary and binary concepts within your psyche, including gender, programmed into you by culture, as part of his overall system.
he literally advised that men should reconnect with their repressed feminine side, and vice versa for women.
you're talking about missing "real men" while praising the man who essentially advised the psychological destruction of that concept as a part of the bedrock of his work.
if this was meant to be some weird masculinity flex, you chose the worst person to try to center it around. if this is some lament of men of old being more intellectual, again you miss the point by framing this as a trait of "real" men and not seeing that the entire concept of what we as a society consider and separate as "Male"/"Female" traits is an arbitrary psycho-social division in the first place.
i really can't fathom what you're gesturing at with this.
@@gourdguru do you have autism or sum
You seem to really like men.
Yes, he was describing alchemical realization as useful in some instances in overcoming duality. That however did not mean, chemically castrating children or proposing irreversible surgery without parental consent.
@@sachmo8 Jung made no comment left or right on the matter, as it was outside his area of expertise and focus. Jung was focused on mapping out and understanding the mind to better treat it through psychoanalysis and therapy, as opposed to drug regiments, lobotomies, shock therapy, and other more...let's say "detrimental"... approaches of his day. what can be inferred from his work only supports the approach, since Jung as well as other contemporaries had already well established the relation between body and self, person and persona, and demonstrated the direct positive and negative effects of one on the other and vice versa. but while i can make an argument from inferrence showing his philosophy supports the idea in spirit, the plain fact is, this wasn't Jung's area of expertise, and his general focus was on treatment of the mind through non medical/surgical means via unpacking and understanding the way the mind works, and therefore it was not even tangential to his focus.
as to your allusion to sex change operations and kids:
Good thing that isn't happening then, since children don't get sex change surgery, they are put on temporary/reversible puberty blockers until they are old enough to go through with the surgery to make the transition easier, at which point they would start taking the gender appropriate drug(testosterone/estrogen) and begin arranging/preparing for the surgery, during which time they will likely have started dressing and identifying as the "new" gender beforehand.
The entire process takes years and involves extensive psychological therapy evaluations and the only way in which minors are put on blockers without parental consent is exigent circumstances where the parent already has no legal control due to issues like the child being legally emancipated.
In the event they either decide to stop taking the blockers or are forced to stop taking them due to financial, legal, or social reasons, that person will experience puberty at that time. the only shortcomings of a late puberty are miniscule reductions in aesthetic things like how easy it is to grow a beard, or how deep your voice is, missing out on that last 1/2 inch of growth spurt, etc.
We've had puberty blockers since at least the early to mid 70's and have used them for other non-gender affirming reasons in medicine for decades, they are well studied and proven both safe and effective. none of this is "new" or "controversial" ground, this field of research and medicine is old enough that it was around for the 3rd Reich to burn en masse.
but by all means, continue engaging in your paranoid delusional fantasy to justify your already preheld prejudices against an entire group you have no vested interest in, and a field of medical advancement that's been around for literally over a century and who's emotional and psychological benefits have been studied and proven(first US sex change was in 1917. additionally, by 1952, LIFE magazine's cover was titled "Ex-GI Becomes Blonde Beauty" and featured Christine Jorgensen, born as George, a WWII army veteran who transitioned in 1950).
And continue ignoring the fact that we already have rather solid regulatory protections across the board preventing operational and medical procedures on minors without informed consent of both patient and legal guardian. so the point you pretend to be your focus(protecc the children) is mute from the start, and just being used to obfuscate an attack on the general practice et al, in lieu of having an actual valid argument.
seriously, it's not about "protecting the kids", that's just an appeal to emotion fallacy used as the conservative's last bastion against reason.
that's always the hollow excuse:
- when they tried to say Elvis' swinging hips were going to corrupt young impressionable minds.
- when they tried to say rock and roll was satanic and was going to brainwash your children with reverse messages
- when they tried to say Dungeons & Dragons was a "guide to witchcraft and the occult" that would destroy your children
- when they tried to say that all gay people were kiddie diddling perverts
- when they tried to claim rap music was all satanic illuminati members
- when they said videogames were murder simulators and pokemon was demonic
- when they tried to say that all democrats were in a satanic blood drinking kiddie diddler cult
The arguments get more and more utterly ridiculous as the years go by, and every time, when it turns out there ISN'T a Commie spy hiding in your rose bushes, and the blacks or immigrants or the gays or the trans people aren't the bogeyman diddling your kids because it's your pastor or your brother-in-law, and the board games aren't teaching your children the ancient magic of the Heptameron, and the games and the music aren't to blame and it's JUST bad parenting and social alienation, the last hollow and empty cry is always the voice of Maude Flanders from The Simpsons shouting, "But WHY won't ANYONE think of the CHILDREN?!?!".
The Simpsons literally created a character 34 YEARS ago JUST for making fun of this one rhetorical behavior and the people who most often resort to it, it's old and tired and everyone knows the deal. it isn't in the service of defending or protecting america's youth, it's using america's youth as a rhetorical shield to hide behind, nothing more.
bottom line, the mountains of research data and longterm studies we have from decades of research speaks in favor of the option, children are not "at risk" and there are already existing medical regulatory frameworks to further ensure that. so if some duderino wants to be a dudette, let him. Why do I care?
Elon Musk wants to put a computer chip in our brains so he can send push notifications from his twitter telling us to update our software directly into our frontal lobe, my neighbor has an AI assistant that's always listening and controls his whole house, and the NYPD are buying gunmounted robotic dogs. i'm gonna have an ethernet port on the back of my neck, but i'm supposed to be worried about a guy wanting fake boobs?
not exactly my first, second, third, or fourth priorities in this neo-dystopian hellscape, mate.
Carl has kind eyes.
I love when someone talking without bias like this. It's annoying when people shut me off when I tried to speak using different perspective. People tend to only listen to what they wanted to hear.
I'm not advocating Hitler, but we could learn from his actions. What history taught you, look at them with non-bias eyes, and you might even learn the qualities in which could enhance your lives.
Victors write the history books also. Vast majority of people’s opinions on ww2 are meticulously engineered to be a certain way and that’s fact
I don't think you need to explain what he means. Terminology of science does not contradict common sense. It is only nowadays trendy to interpret things into what we want to hear.
Everyone in the comment section, with all due respect, read the goddamn pinned comment before you speak your mind
The only myth here are the lies They feed us. That fellow was on time Life magazine cover twice by the way. And this one here is just a mere page Turner.
God bless you
The greatest story never told, watch it.
Changed my life
@marcusvirta3695 it does, because the idea is still alive
Ya, I watched it to. There's a reasons it's illegal in many countries lol.
@@dallasfurnish3031 The reason is that they cant handle the truth and no other narrative around WW2 is allowed, it would make people ask uncomfortable questions but you cant kill the truth.
@@llumiinati the documentary has been made illegal and banned in multiple countries. Instead of disagreeing with me how about you look up what I said to verify it.
How many idiots are going to see this snippet and take it out of the full context. Jung was describing Adolph as he was to the German people who followed him, not as an outsider would see him.
Yes, absolute simpletons.
you guys are psudo-intellectuals 💀he was time magazines man of the year for a reason you cretins
It's like Jordan Peterson copied his way of speaking.
Bro I was in one of his lectures yesterday and realized he is creating a new book… spoilers, he will copy Answer to Job 🤦♂️
Yeah just like all people imitate the people they look up to. No one is original. We are all conditioned.
@@cedrickdherlin6710oh wow, im new to both of them, where would you say that we can detect the copy from j.peterson to C. G. Jung?
I mean where can we detect most of it copy? Or where do you percive it? So i can guide my self better gettin others persoectives, ty brother
@@eleesss3Peterson covers Jung a lot but doesn't seem to know how to apply Jung's archetypes to the Bible. Because Peterson reads the Bible quite literally to find his morals, which he apparently would not have without the Bible.
Another based Jung video
Very based
This is similar to the phenomenon of sebastianism in Brazil. It is notable that the country's most notable (not necessarily the "best") leaders were populists and perceived as a godsend. As saviors.
Are you portuguese?
The truth is stranger than fiction
He's talking about the narrative, the story, the world we believe in.
We are in a narrative right now.
Your perception of evil determined by what side of the line you stand on
Yes.... One man's terrorist truly is another man's freedom fighter. And the winners of the wars write the history.
Yes, whether you stand on the side of good or evil changes your perception
When you're talking about Hitler and the Nazis it's pretty clear what is evil....
very based mister
if he won, we would worship him like gandhi.
Killed 6 millioner. I dont think so.....
Maybe, But if Ghandi lost, you wouldn't even know his name...
No, we wouldn't.
His ideology depended on pseudologic and pseudoscience, which would've obviously come to light eventually.
We would not worship him. We'd despise him as any people under a dictatorship would despise their supreme leader.
Jung was an early member of the NSDAP & saw the movement as a way of returning to a purer, more organic way of life. The Reich also financially secured Jung’s psychology work in a German clinic.
Naturally, he later modified his original thoughts after the war.
Based
Jung would probably say the same of Modi of today's India
Yes, to those who come upon this video,Jung was -NOT- calling hitler an ( actual hero) he was speaking in a much different context!
Explain the context
the archetype of the hero is not necessarily good. He's just relating his perspective on Hitler as a psychological archetype, as the Germanic figure of Wotan. Who was also a chaotic and destructive hero.
Sometimes someone's savior ends up being a destructor.
What is this from? I didn’t see this part in the full length BBC interview
Watch Europa the last battle
Richtig
oh my god is that the 50 part thing my co worker wont shut the fuck up about. just say youre a nazi sympathizer bro.
Hero archetype in the German Myth. You missed that important and small detail
A myth so mythical, that all it took was for a German to walk outside with their eyes open and see?
That was in the video, an import detail you missed. "A hero, in the German myth." And @radical I think you're misunderstanding the context in which "myth" was used here.
@@radicalindividual7774one day for no reason at all....
Full video?
Was this interview conducted after the Jwsh committee commissioned the Frankfurt school to write “The Authoritarian Personality” which was an assault against Western Christian Family structure?
Based
?
@@MorabitAbderahman-Berkane@
i don't think he means what you think he means
leave it to a nazi to have 0 comprehension skills ig
Watching this man speak really does separate the wheat from the chaff
I listened to speeches that Hitler gave and he was saying to the German people everything any group of people would want to hear that you are the best the strongest the smartest the bravest that we're going to resurrect the German people to the position they deserve as hardworking industrious people. Just put yourself in their position and think of a leader who would say this about your people. Also remember not every German was a Nazi and many fought against them to the death and of their own family. Many Germans that were not Jews died in the concentration camps. The Nazis killed many elderly, disabled, mentally ill and diseased and also homosexuals which was a crime in much of the world during those days. It is of note that more people were killed by far under communism and only recently have people really started to make mention of this. Approximately 100 million people died under communism whereas maybe 1/5th or 20% died under Nazism.
And how many died under imperialism *cough cough* USA, Britain, Netherlands...
@@schoschta4813 why don't you do some research instead of relying on listening to somebody's propaganda indoctrinating you and don't just read their info.
Belgium
@@schoschta4813how many did genghis kahn wipe out…get back to me. Stalin and China. British imperialism was trade agreements not genocide.
British are quite possibly the biggest colonials and genocide drivers in history. Just Look at india and Ireland and America
Father of proactive psychology
He's just saying something that one day, very soon, every person of European descent will see.
It´s really easy to twist the total meaning about a real complex reality with a simple short film jajaj. A hero in "the German myth"... Jung later explains his own moral dejection regarding totalitarianism... Jung was an extrange humanist, a clairvoyant wise man who helped us get to know deep pneuma phenomena from unconcious phsyque -vers l´elan vital et ses mysteres cachés- where mind, culture and spirit becomes sorts of one single living corpus in history
The lil I know of history, Germany or ww2 wasn't "hitler" he was actually a victim in a way
What was happening to the German people that made them believe they needed a Savior? It's not a rhetorical question.
The question is..."why did HumanNature decide to use This clip and that particular edited piece??
The clip could have easily been longer to avoid any confusion...?
Hnmmm, None of us are exempt.
A couple of squeezes...oh no.. those look truly terrifying for somebody who has a slight claustrophobia. 😮 Not that being inside of a deep underwater cave wouldn't be enough...but to additionally have to squeeze yourself through tiny openings... frightening.
He is so correct
why did he look like he was punched?
Finally some uncensored objectivity around this mired topic. (You can censor anything under the claim of antisemitism these days)
based means true
Jung's accent had a pinch of Geordie!
Very uncomfortable body language. He was put in a very difficult position to answer a very complex question 🤔 😕
Brilliant man.
Look at stabby Germany now..
There's a hero if you look inside his heart.
Do you know what being a hero means?
@@Sapientia-in-senectutedefinitely not putting a stranglehold on a nation's economy and push them to the edge and force them to push back and start a war 😊
@@arai6147 do you know what being a hero means?
@@Sapientia-in-senectute "a person who is admired for having done something very brave or having achieved something great" (Cambridge Dictionary)
@@herruralmajesty8555 thats not what being a hero means thats the definition of calling someone a hero, you said theres a hero in his heart, how?
To hurt others is to hurt your self
because others are yourself?
Jung had an opportunity to explain in the way he explains life but he didn't. I think because there was a part of him that loved Hitler. That's why he is stuttering and messing his words.
When is this interview from?
1957
In other words, well after Hitlers atrocities and way after Hitler was awarded man Man of the Year, 1938 by TIME magazine.
He’s just explaining Hitler not condoning
cope
Wooooo! The roller coaster ride!
Jung's concept of anima and anomus changed my perception
Always thought Jung was far superior to Freud some disagree,for them to much mystasiciam, for others, the Buddhist, have come the closest to figuring it all out
Jung understands the magical aspect of existence and the influence it has on the programming of individuals! The Egyptians term this the ka - the soul in a living body and the ba - the soul in death! Jung makes it practically tangible using his concept of unconscious and conscious personality! This is why he says it's impossible to explain fully how he influenced the German people using mythos. This is because the unconscious part of the explanation cannot be explained because it's unconscious but consciously present operating in a get unknown dimension.
Jung knew his limits.
"Hero Figures are far more Important than Fathers" hits diffrent seriously spoken by an grounded & wise old man, especially in the Internet Age.
The amount of young man Andrew Tate has saved through his "roll" as Top G, must have equalize some millions of fathers taking the one way ticket to the cigarette machine🏃♂️💨
How i would explain Hitler and answer this question is simple: Hitler adhered to Excorcism, while The Father was Perfect Enough for Intercession. Intercession disarms the beast whilst remaining peaceful in delivering his Heart. In this, the Life is respected more. Hitler had no regard for human life. He is Seen as Magic Hero in the sense that he manipulated others to get to that point of "Hero".
Sound Familiar??
plot twist was heavy
has anyone ever experienced the archetypes of the myths? if so hows it going with the opposer?
Well this explains why Hitler is in Persona 2
The more time passes Hitler seems less deranged
😢
As people allow themselves to forget the horrific suffering
@@rfree863 by who?
The more you turn into a Nazi...
Your comment perfectly illustrates the dangers of considering things from a purely "intellectual" perspective, and taking out the MORALITY.... Hitler may or may not have been "deranged", but he WAS a very EVIL person....along with the Nazi ideology he espoused....
Visionary.
Please help me find the full interview??
I am not able to send links anymore. but if you type Interview with Dr Carl Jung 1957 on search you can easily find the source.
@@humannature698
Thank u
... Oh, no, I could never begin to explain Hitler and then proceedes to perfectly sum up and explain him exactly as he was viewed during his time in power ...
Facts
Thanks to this guys Bill W created the program of AA.
If the "hero" is more important than "any father", would this not also pertain too "god the father"? Is Achilles the hero more important than Zevs the "allfather"?
I am genuinely curious.
well, i think zeus and other god images are not just father figures, they are also hero/wizard and so on... but the fact is people can associate with achilles and other more worldy heros much more than all powerful characters
How many times has Humanity not been destroyed by his example? An objective question. I am Hebrew, fuck thy guy, only the shadow ‘knows,’ yeah?
Why couldn't the SS and people they were against work out some type of diplomatic agreement?
Are you being genuine? Or is this just a troll?
Hitler tried. He was denied multiple times all while winning the war
Although he was chiefly referring to communism in The Undiscovered Self, it doesn’t leave much room to worry that Jung would compliment Hitler. He discusses a sort of societal mental illness that goes hand in hand with the State supplanting the reason and morality of the individual and how the people best suited to rise to the top in that situation are those who already were mentally ill as individuals. It’s frightening how well it applies to almost any modern political movement that I am familiar with actually.
can you elaborate on why you think he is chiefly referring to communism in regards of The Undiscovered Self?
“What is the significance of that split, symbolized by the ‘Iron Curtain,’ which divides humanity into two halves? What will become of our civilization, and of man himself, if the hydrogen bombs begin to go off, or if the spiritual and moral darkness of State absolutism should spread over Europe?” He also felt the need to add footnotes addressing the Hungarian revolution.
Hitler was portraying himself as a hero figure, which he was for many of his followers at that time.
That does not mean that Hitler was a Hero (!)
People in the comments don‘t really get it. But what am I expecting under a RUclips Short Video..
People are way too easily moved by political "saviors." Jung was a prophet in a very real sense; his teachings should be required education. Brilliant man.
🙌🏻
Explain the demonic Carl.
Looking back on ww2 as a germanic person at the times we live in. Its really hard to not become neonazi. Its all true what he said and its really hard to proof it wronge.
Anyone who knows of Carl's work would know that he is NOT complimenting the old dictator. I feel like he is mocking his inner conscience and status in his society at the time
He said that clearly myth and it's right the Germans loved him