How OneWeb's Connectivity Works
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 авг 2024
- Animation explaining how OneWeb's global communications system delivers and maintains superior global, high speed and low latency connectivity, using more than 600 Low Earth Orbit satellites.
![FNAF Into the Pit has A LOT of Unused Graphics | LOST BITS [TetraBitGaming]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6YhZCRdipl4/mqdefault.jpg)
Love you Oneweb... 🙏 All the best...you are doing everything that's needed..
Will see you soon in India 👍👍🙋🏻♂️
Great explanation, crystal clear!
Here after Gareeb scientists.
🤗🤗
This video tells me almost nothing. Do the satellites communicate with each other in order to reduce the need for a dense global network of ground based gateways? How do the user terminals operate - are they using phased arrays antennas to track the one satellite they are currently connected to? Or, are they using a simpler omni antenna like ground based cellular networks?
This was a clear explanation... thank you! 🥚
Amazing if the teams involved can pull off such novel technology. Very excited to follow this company’s path forward and watch it compete with heavy hitters like Amazon and Spacex.
This download simulation does not tell me anything. For all I know a 4.1 second download for a photo can be pretty slow
For virtually any rational photo file size, a 4.1 second download is ridiculously slow. Basically on-par with an old dial-up 56K modem. It better be a LOT faster than that!
Could be an AVI file. Nothing is stated
The audio is very low. The constant popping of the music also is a bit distracting.
How many satellites you need for that ? And how are you planning to put there ?
Satellites are just internet
Cooool
Love My Starlink service in Montana US. Fast and Reliable. Changed my life for good.
Will you be arrving in philippines? If not, just don't arrive here. It sucks
is the company listed can we buy stocks ?
This is some really cool technology. Loved the explanation and animations, perfectly explained the technology and it's applications
No, it didn't...
Coll technology for stupid people ...
Give this project up
U have us trapped against our will.
Hi, OneWeb; I appreciate your endeavors for a improved; connected, interlinked & remarkable earth. You have competition, which is beneficial to you and user's as an example; SpaceX Starlink. I immensely support you with this sattelite constellation project & please do finalize, implement it, yield it available up & running for public usage in expected timeframe all around our planet earth for human's to benefit and to communicate coherently/swiftly/elaborately.
Please price it affordable/cheap thus it's accessable to most people inclusive the poorest. Low latency, ultra high speed broadband sattelite internet with cheap affordable user terminals setup's may be installed every location in earth.
Please create a identical or superior satellite constellation for earth or other habitable planets in future we would live with voice calling, text, internet services through satellites connected to ground user terminals & connection to directly to smartphones which can be used anywhere around the planet similar to terrestrial 4G-5G+ network's but, data is routed through sattelites instead of terrestrial wireless digital GSM network's that electromagnetic data signal's can penetrate through solid objects, under water, indoors etc+ coming from sattelites which can sustain important benefit's.
Let's create a new chapter in life & communication data here in planet earth and beyond in habitable world's we seek to live in near future. 😎👍🌷🍎🙃
Annnnnnd their bankrupt... They never really had a chance as it takes a huge amount of capital and resources to even attempt a system such as this. For example, each one of OneWebs satellites costs around 1M to produce. Counter that with it costing only 300K for each one of Starlinks satelites. That's roughly a 700K difference for just one satellite! Now knowing an actual competent roll out will take thousands of satellites with SpaceX's mega constellation including 12K alone! How could they ever hope to survive? This also isn't including the MASSIVE savings SpaceX enjoys by being able to use its own rockets as launch vehicles for Starlinks satellites.
It sucks to see a lack of competition, but in this area is completely understandable.
@@JoesGLI they've been bought out now by the UK government and a rather large Indian telecoms company but the next steps and when the launches restart is still a mystery. Something you're not factoring in with the sat costs is that onewebs orbit in a polar orbit and at around double the height of starlinks orbit and so the satilites need to cover a wider area are probably larger and so cost more but they'll also need way less of them to cover the planet oneweb constellation is planned to be under 700 including coverage of both poles which of course is an area with poor communication so would likely want more options but the niche market of expeditions and researchers is probably too small for starlink to pay to expand to. Meanwhile starlink has about the equivalent of a full oneweb constellation up now and there's only fairly small bands of coverage in both hemmespheres.
@@tgm9991 in March2023 Oneweb i read that already 500Satellites r in LEO sky with funding of Airtel India TelCo. is it right and r we expecting the service starting soon in 2023?
Think I’ll stick with Starlink.
What is the range of connection up and download speeds in bps and what is the latency ranges? Typically satellite communication for internet is OK for for streaming and getting web pages, but wont work for gaming....something to think about
So this is basically Starlink, but from a company nobody knows and with videos that tell me nothink.
Starlink has said they will offer satellite internet, but they don't really give anything more info wise either. Yes it the same concept, the same concept behind Viasat and HughesNet that have been doing it with Geostationary satellites for almost a decade. Its nothing new, just now a few companies want to move to low Earth orbit instead of Geostationary, offering lower latency but really nothing else. Low Earth orbit satellites require many more launches than normal, so while HughesNet can cover the entirety of North America with a single satellite, low Earth orbit satellites will need thousands to do the same. We have yet to see how that will perform, because the same tiny satellite that is spending most of its time over Africa and the ocean will also have to cover all of Los Angeles for a few minutes by itself, so that may give some awful performance in cities and other populated areas. The solution for this would be huge and powerful satellites, but that is wasteful and increases cost a ton for something that is, again, spending most of its time over unpopulated areas and oceans.
Ai makes this shit up. Yeah they can do that
.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
You internet 5G ? Or Wifi?
@@elonmusk9756 Thank you very much for responding to that I did not mean that your future promising Starling internet 5G will be wifi or dish antenna will be.
@@elonmusk9756 ???
@@elonmusk9756 I say, how do we keep up with your starlink satellites? starlink 5G wifi or antenna?
@@elonmusk9756 figured out the price would not be expensive INSALLAH antenna? Thank you very much for the answer.
😎😎😎
🙄😉
And this is how they will control our every step including the thoughts we think.
k
Google.com
tesla FTW! his starlink will reign supreme
SpaceX isn't Tesla, they just have the same CEO. SpaceX isn't a person, so starlink does not belong to "him", but to "it". Starlink has no tech the other two don't. Also they have $35 billion behind them, so if they do better I won't be surprised. In fact I am almost sure they will do better than everyone else, because they have idiots who will do anything Elon tells them to.
Is it free !!?
So how are they going to beat space x.... I'll bet they fold in the next year