How it Works Fat Man Oppenheimer Trinity Atomic Bomb

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 июл 2023
  • Oppenheimer Trinity Test, marked the inception of the implosion-design plutonium, eventually leading to the detonation of the Fat Man atomic weapon, over Nagasaki.
    The outer charge explodes inward, followed by the inner ring of explosives, creating a concave shockwave.
    It moves to the Aluminum pusher, breaking the barren plastic sphere.
    The shockwaves continue toward the uranium-two three eight, It travels further compressing the plutonium sphere and compressing it more.
    Interestingly this was James Tuck idea.
    A British physicist who suggested employing shaped charges as three-dimensional explosive lenses.
    But it was further developed and perfected by Von Neumann, a Hungarian-American mathematician, physicist and computer scientist.
    Instagram
    / aitelly3d
    Twitter
    / aitelly3d
    We make it on Blender
    Download it is free and Safe
    www.blender.org/download/
    Peace Out
    As a Small Channel We encourage you sharing our Videos ,
    But Kindly be advised that any unofficial translations or editing of our work in any medium will be considered a breach of our intellectual property rights.
    Apologies for the Legal Language, This happens because we had faced a lot of Duplicates Contents through Experiences ;)
    This has been a result of Big Channels Duplicating our Contents Ripping our original hard work which we have created from Scratch from Modeling to Rigging to Animation to Rendering.So we had to involved Lawyers.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 456

  • @zorintoto1167
    @zorintoto1167 10 месяцев назад +730

    Can you show us a step by step tutorial how to build one please .

    • @turbopower7308
      @turbopower7308 10 месяцев назад +71

      😂😂😂 lol

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +126

      😅

    • @monojitdey2238
      @monojitdey2238 10 месяцев назад +34

      Please make video on this

    • @SV2098
      @SV2098 10 месяцев назад +77

      Iran wants to know your location

    • @rajareddy391
      @rajareddy391 10 месяцев назад +4

      😂😂

  • @azzael321
    @azzael321 10 месяцев назад +102

    Clean visuals + very simplified commentary makes a big difference in understanding for us non-academic folks.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +6

      🙏 Your Awesome we tried our best.

  • @TheMau5meister
    @TheMau5meister 10 месяцев назад +238

    To think that this was 80 years ago, and we still have people that think the world is flat to this day. Great explanation, thank you!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +12

      Your Awesome too 👍 thanks 🙏

    • @vishveshtadsare3160
      @vishveshtadsare3160 10 месяцев назад +2

      Its not hard

    • @terrancebulong4573
      @terrancebulong4573 10 месяцев назад +9

      @@vishveshtadsare3160 ah yeah I'm sure you and your grandmother can build one out of the scrap in your backyard yah

    • @jpotter2086
      @jpotter2086 10 месяцев назад +5

      ... and this now a very crude design. We marvel over miniaturization in our electronics, but nukes did it first!

    • @chrismusix5669
      @chrismusix5669 9 месяцев назад +3

      @@vishveshtadsare3160 The engineering is hard. Getting the focused explosives into the right shape, the thicknesses of the layers around the core, and the fuse timing takes a bit of calculation.

  • @buckhorncortez
    @buckhorncortez 10 месяцев назад +6

    The explosive lenses had two different explosives. The outer explosive was Composition B (fast explosive) and then the inner explosive Baratol (slow explosive). Composition B is a mixture of RDX (cyclotiimethylenetrirutiamine) and TNT (trinitrotoluene). Composition B consists of RDX (59.5 %, by mass), TNT (39.5 %) and desensitizing wax (1%). This explosive has a density of 1.70 g/cm3, and a detonation velocity of 8480 m/s. Baratol is a mixture of barium nitrate and TNT. It is 76% barium nitrate and 24% TNT. It has a density of 2.64 grams/cm3 and a detonation velocity of 4900 m/s. The final inner layer of explosives next to the pusher was made of Composition B.

  • @HistoryfortheAges
    @HistoryfortheAges 10 месяцев назад +24

    I am a history professor. Saw Oppenheimer and loved it! I am no expert on the science behind all this, so this was a cool video. Thank you! The History of the movie was pretty spot on, but if you wondered how much of the little stories within the movie were true I made a new video on my channel answering many of those questions. Happy to share. Every historical movie embellishes some things, but overall it was a very accurate movie and amazing to watch!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +2

      Happy to watch your videos 👍 thanks for your information

    • @ghost307
      @ghost307 10 месяцев назад +1

      One science item that I noticed was Oppenheimer giving General Groves his estimate of 3 kilotons for the Trinity test.
      Oppenheimer actually thought that it wouldn't work being their very first attempt.

    • @Rose-jr4tx
      @Rose-jr4tx 9 месяцев назад +1

      Speaking of history, The fact that the "Christian" West would commit and practice a great many cardinal sins, many of them knowingly, such as centuries-long global;
      - 'Colonization',
      - 'Genocide',
      - 'Slavery',
      - 'Colonialism',
      - 'Global Warming', etc which benefits them enormously for centuries worldwide; then they would initiate and take a measure to ban those practices worldwide, and take credit for it.
      [Note: Today's global warming is caused in large part by nearly two centuries of excessive coal burning, mainly in the West.]
      Christian European Colonization of,
      - North America & South America,
      - Siberia & Far-East Asia,
      - Australia & New Zealand in Asia-Pacific. 😔
      Europe for Native Europeans,
      Africa for Native Africans,
      America for Native Americans,
      Asia-Pacific for Native Asians-Pacific islanders. 🤷

  • @twill.AF9002
    @twill.AF9002 9 месяцев назад +14

    This was done very well from a scientific perspective! As a retired member of the USAF with hundreds of hours of aircrew time I love it.

  • @cholaempire
    @cholaempire 9 месяцев назад +6

    Incredible video. The amount of effort you put into this is amazing

  • @user-gd5io7zi9u
    @user-gd5io7zi9u 9 месяцев назад +3

    Outstanding work as always keep it up . Incredible video. The amount of effort you put into this is amazing.

  • @claudiocorleone7856
    @claudiocorleone7856 10 месяцев назад +28

    Unbelievable what these men accomplished . No computers to calculate what then took months to do today those calculations would be done in hours. Total respect.

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 9 месяцев назад +3

      "hours"? Do you have a steam-powered computer?

    • @GeoffreyFeldmanMA
      @GeoffreyFeldmanMA 9 месяцев назад

      Seconds, not hours. I wish people would not comment with their unique feelings and personal speculations. Nobody cares if such as you have "total respect". What does "total respect" mean anyway? So - why post?

    • @dontgetmadgetwise4271
      @dontgetmadgetwise4271 9 месяцев назад +3

      They did have computers. But your point is not without merit.

    • @luceatlux7087
      @luceatlux7087 9 месяцев назад

      ​@@GeoffreyFeldmanMA While I understand and identify with your feelings, your approach is probably one that would tend to spread a bit of a negative, overcritical regard for our fellow human beings.
      23 people identified with and purportedly enjoyed the sentiment to which you refer. Thus the more appropriate question might be: Why let such a benign expression elicit such disrespect ('No one cares if such as you...)?
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      further reading if you're a reader. if it's some kind of buirden, forget it. "ain't know won gunna reed all that!"
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Just fwiw, I've ultimately come to the conclusion that, with the goal of prioritizing disdain properly and homing in on/understanding those who are TRULY making life worse (and curbing their influence vs helping the better influences), it's best to forgive the smaller things that have basically kindly intentions behind them (eg, this op would likely mostly be an expression to simply connect with others about a harmless emotion of being in awe; a positive regard of another).
      There is SO much ego-driven, incredibly-ill-considered, narrow judgment out there that's PURPOSEFULLY DESIGNED to belittle and spread negativity. So I always try and just silently forgive and forget irritations when people are just being people (sometimes absent-minded, irritating etc).
      If I work through it and understand that the intentions are essentially benevolent, I kinda' see it as a case of not being one of the 'patient zeros' for transmitting the true irritants in life.
      Not to mention, when you have the idiots who love the emotional tone of the intelligent harsher-spirited criticisms, they try to emulate this kind of thing (in an effort to exalt their immature egos) and it comes out as invalid criticisms of everyone they disagree with because they aren't smart enough to deliver valid perspectives or content with their emotional expression... smearing vehement ignorance all over the place.
      I guess I try to identify the intention behind stuff and try to understand what kind of regard it spreads (how des it affect idiots... smart people? average people? youths/immature people? etc)... or not; whatever.
      I try to save my emotionally-based criticisms (as yours is) for the REAL F'Kers who make things suck in life.
      sht... loooong....
      oh well. take it, leave it. just thought i'd share some ideas about the issue.

  • @beyondinfinity3876
    @beyondinfinity3876 10 месяцев назад +6

    One of the most detailed video about nuxlear weapon!🙏🙏

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +2

      Thanks 👍

  • @dontmesswiththeriddim2699
    @dontmesswiththeriddim2699 10 месяцев назад +33

    These animations (Blender's not that easy to master), and the work you guys put in, AND of course the concise explanations as to what and how it happened is otherworldly! Love your channel and these videos; keep them coming! Subbed for your amazing work that you guys put in ♥
    And yes, I will consult my friendly neighbourhood nuclear physicist too for more; he may or may not be building a bomb to show me how it happens in situ

    • @casedistorted
      @casedistorted 9 месяцев назад

      Still curious if they use AI for the voice narration with some of the weird pronunciations.

  • @luisevidal
    @luisevidal 9 месяцев назад +1

    This is an outstanding explanation of this subject. You guys are incredibly good.

  • @kamesh276
    @kamesh276 9 месяцев назад

    Awesome animation explaining the complex concepts. Great work!

  • @aliframdani_
    @aliframdani_ 9 месяцев назад +1

    Incredibel animation and easy to understand explanation. Love it!

  • @ahmedaldawood4
    @ahmedaldawood4 10 месяцев назад +4

    Outstanding work as always keep it up 👍🏻

  • @porfirioErodriguez
    @porfirioErodriguez 10 месяцев назад +4

    I always like your vids mate... the 2 people behind the animations are top-notch. Always recommend this channel to a fellow RUclips watcher out there. Great stuff.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +1

      Your awesome mate 👍
      Thanks 👍

  • @paulhofman
    @paulhofman 9 месяцев назад +2

    At 2:14 'the main fusion material' should be 'the main fission material'. Like Uranium, plutonium was used for nuclear fission, not fusion. Fusion was only used in the later and more potent thermonuclear bombs.

  • @illuzionizhere-bobbyfpv5977
    @illuzionizhere-bobbyfpv5977 10 месяцев назад +8

    So freaking awesome (the animation that is)!
    Very good presentation; easy to follow and understand. Keep em coming!! o7

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад

      Wit Do

  • @NicolasPare
    @NicolasPare 10 месяцев назад +6

    I appreciate your videos immensely. Amazing quality, content is always interesting, just beautifully delivered information It's always a nice surprise to be notified of a new video.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад

      Thanks Nicola Pare we love you guys 🙏

  • @manikantasriram98
    @manikantasriram98 2 месяца назад

    Editor deserves a salute

  • @YenPitchayen
    @YenPitchayen 9 месяцев назад +2

    Great as always. Nicely done.

  • @thomazbarros9146
    @thomazbarros9146 9 месяцев назад +7

    So, the bomb is a football ball 🤣🤣

  • @BillRau2152
    @BillRau2152 10 месяцев назад +6

    It’s amazing they had the technology to make the three different radioactive parts of the device in perfect nested spheres

    • @jakistam1000
      @jakistam1000 9 месяцев назад +2

      The fact that they are radioactive didn't matter much; they were just metals. As long as you don't exceed the critical mass, you can melt it, hit it with hammers, cut it etc., and it isn't any more dangerous than just standing next to it.

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 4 месяца назад

      @@jakistam1000 well actually, both uranium and plutionium are heavy metals, thus are toxic - and plutoium is particularly vicious. It sheds, is easily to oxidize, is cancerogenic as faq, produces bubbles of hydrogen inside.

  • @baotrangia3417
    @baotrangia3417 2 месяца назад

    Thank you so much for this animation!

  • @lorentzinvariant7348
    @lorentzinvariant7348 Месяц назад

    Thank you for properly demonstrating the way the neutron causes fission. So many descriptions out there imply the neutron blows apart the nucleus kinetically as it randomly spits and releases neutrons. This is not the case. The neutron gets close enough to be absorbed by the nuclear force that acts at very small distances only. Upon absorption the nucleus becomes unstable and blows apart into specific fragments predefined by the internal dynamics involved also releasing additional neutrons in the process. There is a finite time between neutron absorption and fission.

  • @paulhofman
    @paulhofman 9 месяцев назад +1

    What a beautiful animation. Well done.

  • @johnsmith-hf1hm
    @johnsmith-hf1hm 10 месяцев назад

    Beautiful vidi of the process, nicely stylized. You guys have a future in this biz. Subscribing now.

  • @channghiem5012
    @channghiem5012 5 месяцев назад

    thanks for this video and explanation!

  • @zillsburyy1
    @zillsburyy1 9 месяцев назад +6

    its crazy how Oppenheimer gets all the credit

    • @krymsun3134
      @krymsun3134 9 месяцев назад +2

      Nah the movie describes what he did very well.

    • @garrymullins
      @garrymullins 9 месяцев назад

      Someone has to take credit when they're able to move from theory to practice, if the original theorist isn't able to do it.

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 9 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@krymsun3134Nope. Oppenheimer's most important contribution was reorganizing the project, and the movie didn't say one damned thing about it.

    • @krymsun3134
      @krymsun3134 9 месяцев назад

      @@perniciouspete4986 what are you talking about he spent an hour organizing it lmao

  • @Shadobanned4life
    @Shadobanned4life 9 месяцев назад +1

    Excellent video. Thank You ! 🌞

  • @Bluedot1
    @Bluedot1 9 месяцев назад +1

    Dear Mr. AiTelly
    You gave a very nice explanation with 3D visuals…
    It is mind-boggling to see the depiction of this type of weapons operating on the earth's surface in a habitable place.... It is the desire of the people of the world to use this science only for creation...
    My thanks to you for making it clear to those who don't know

  • @andykay479
    @andykay479 10 месяцев назад +2

    Amazing video thanks. The thing I would have liked to have seen explained is why the design of the plutonium bomb changed so radically from that of the uranium bomb, but I understand the constraints you face in making this kind of video. More please!

    • @dontgetmadgetwise4271
      @dontgetmadgetwise4271 9 месяцев назад +3

      Plutonium 239 is much more responsive to stray neutrons. The gun approach would have failed to bring the two components together before the energy released busted the assembly apart. A fizzle.

  • @satujie1653
    @satujie1653 9 месяцев назад

    It is fookin awesome..
    Great one mate 👍

  • @cachito1984
    @cachito1984 9 месяцев назад

    Nice break down and explanation

  • @Rarest.Ranger320
    @Rarest.Ranger320 Месяц назад

    10/10 step by step tutorial

  • @typerightseesight
    @typerightseesight 10 месяцев назад +2

    this is so massive i had to watch it like 5x to understand it for some reason.

  • @leeread6757
    @leeread6757 9 месяцев назад

    I met Commander Frederick Ashworth at a presentation in Los Alamos in 2005.
    Had an interesting conversation with him after the presentation. He was 93 years old and passed away a few months later.
    He armed the Nagasaki bomb( Fat Man).

  • @venkatreddy9693
    @venkatreddy9693 10 месяцев назад +1

    I always love your videos. Great indepth analysis. Can you make the video differentiating the nuclear and non nuclear bombs?

  • @Awesome21
    @Awesome21 10 месяцев назад +4

    keep doing great work guys 👍

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад

      Thanks You👍
      Your Awesome

  • @markgilmore2077
    @markgilmore2077 8 месяцев назад

    Great work, please make more

  • @micahtataje
    @micahtataje 9 месяцев назад +1

    Love the video! Gotta do the H-bomb next

  • @xandervideo1
    @xandervideo1 9 месяцев назад

    Very interesting, thank you.

  • @UntitledJAY_1Q
    @UntitledJAY_1Q 10 месяцев назад +3

    Great channel for my little brother who always ask questions on how things work. He love your channel AiTelly ❤️❤️ keep it up.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +1

      Glad your Brother liked it 😁
      Your Awesome

  • @Darkosa1234
    @Darkosa1234 10 месяцев назад +2

    Great presentation!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад

      Thanks 👍 Your Great Too

  • @Martinroot
    @Martinroot 7 месяцев назад

    Really nice video guys...
    An idea for next one: The tsar bomb?

  • @jigdalbhutia8112
    @jigdalbhutia8112 10 месяцев назад +4

    You n yr team creativity and dedication to producing high-quality content are truly commendable. It's evident that you put your heart and soul into each video, and that passion shines through in every frame.
    Your videos have not only entertained me but have also broadened my perspective on different subjects. Your thoughtful approach to complex issues has encouraged me to think critically and explore new ideas. God bless

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +1

      God bless you too my friend 🙏
      We love you Guys.

  • @International_Corn
    @International_Corn 9 месяцев назад +1

    Imagine dropping the bomb but you forgot to pull off the 3 arming plugs 💀

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 3 месяца назад +1

      The plugs were automatically pulled out when the bomb dropped. They were connected to the plane inside the bomb bay by wires. As the bomb dropped out of the plane when the plugs reached the end of the wires connecting them to the plane, they were pulled out fully arming the bomb. The green plugs separated the arming circuits from the explosives. When the red plugs were put in that gave continuity to the explosives and tests could be run to verify circuit operation. When the red plugs were pulled out, the arming circuits were fully armed in the bomb.

  • @aboutface102
    @aboutface102 10 месяцев назад +4

    Just watched Oppenheimer, great film. I do wish they had explained the science of the bomb a little more and the politics a little less :)

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 3 месяца назад +1

      The movie was based on the book, "American Prometheus." That book deals with Oppenheimer and his life and not the science of the Project. That's why the science was tangential to the story of Oppenheimer in the movie.

  • @StrayzKid
    @StrayzKid 10 месяцев назад

    Great work

  • @markchapman2585
    @markchapman2585 10 месяцев назад +2

    Great video really detailed.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад

      Thanks 👍

  • @eramires
    @eramires 9 месяцев назад

    Implosion is the most elegant solution IMO, I loved the Manhattan Project show that explores the development of the method. 🙂

  • @Robolaralobarar
    @Robolaralobarar 7 месяцев назад

    Very good as usual

  • @RickardoPandiangan
    @RickardoPandiangan 10 месяцев назад +2

    the plug was switched, not removed

  • @chfin7251
    @chfin7251 5 месяцев назад

    Well done!

  • @ARTIFICIALFAITHOFFICAL
    @ARTIFICIALFAITHOFFICAL 9 месяцев назад

    Very well done video 👍

  • @NukePossumSpringsBand
    @NukePossumSpringsBand 8 месяцев назад

    Had the worst dream last night, North America was thrashed by plutonium and uranium spheres like this with nickel spheres closed around them, one detonated right above me and my brother and the only thing between us and the blast was a couple feet of water. The blue flash was wild, I never wanna see that again.

  • @laxmidattadeshpande3722
    @laxmidattadeshpande3722 9 месяцев назад

    Excellent video

  • @jamesboekbinder3967
    @jamesboekbinder3967 3 месяца назад

    Very nicely done! I wonder if there is an overview somewhere of all the work - metallurgy, chemists, physicists, others, who contributed to the creation of the device?

  • @aldrichuyliong8143
    @aldrichuyliong8143 10 месяцев назад +8

    It's sorta crazy how simple the construction seems of so much death.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +2

      Yes

  • @SevenDeMagnus
    @SevenDeMagnus 3 месяца назад

    Cool, thanks sir Oppenheimer.
    God bless.

  • @samuelmarquez1635
    @samuelmarquez1635 9 месяцев назад

    WOW!!!! I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS GUYS!

  • @GaborGubicza
    @GaborGubicza 10 месяцев назад +2

    1:24 why are 5 arming plugs there? I heard that initially all green plugs were inserted which isolated the batteries, then an operator switched all greens to reds connecting the batteries to the circuit. Good stuff guys. Sorry for being a pain in the ass, but after all I'm a research and development engineering manager. Keep up the good work!

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 9 месяцев назад

      Yes, a research and development engineering manager, so you can't help being a pain in the ass. You're forgiven.

  • @danielweaver7435
    @danielweaver7435 10 месяцев назад +1

    Good job i know how hard thisust be to animate this stuff i live your stuff

  • @pjwarez
    @pjwarez 10 месяцев назад

    Ahhhh.. the magic of Blender 3D. Cool!

  • @VIC_TOR_
    @VIC_TOR_ 10 месяцев назад

    Thank you

  • @ramchandramaurya6622
    @ramchandramaurya6622 10 месяцев назад

    Again brilliant video , Best in how it's works . Thanks .... Kindly request to make the same level video on F 35 , especially DAS , data fusion , type tech working .... Thanks a lot ...

  • @rrotstein
    @rrotstein 9 месяцев назад

    The details presented in this video will remain incomprehensible to anyone who does not already understand the physics involved.

    • @YunaAngela
      @YunaAngela 9 месяцев назад

      One without knowledge in physics clearly doesn’t need to know how to build an atomic bomb, if they cared enough they’d acquire at least a bachelor in physics

  • @mathijeba5375
    @mathijeba5375 10 месяцев назад +8

    Please make an video about explaining radars
    • how it works
    •why old radars are curved and why new radars are flat
    •how do they find a target how it will know it's range ,the direction it's moving
    •what are the difference between x-band radars, L-band radars and vhf-band radars and how vhf-band radars can deduct stealth fighters and why x-band radars can't
    Literally how it's works please🙏🙏🙏 make it happen please🙏🙏

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +6

      The problem is RUclips algorithm
      We do not get Views when we make Videos that are not Trending 😔

    • @mathijeba5375
      @mathijeba5375 10 месяцев назад

      @@Aitelly oh! Thanks or reading my comment I hope you will one day

    • @qiyuxuan9437
      @qiyuxuan9437 10 месяцев назад +1

      Not an expert on radar, but I think the old curved radar has a centralized antenna, so it need a curved dish to reflect the signal to the target direction. The flat panel are phased arry radar, they have many small T/R units that can control its signal direction to a certain degree without physically rotating. Those units can either spread out the signal to cover a large area for search, or combine its power and focusing on a single target to get precise tracking for weapon guidance. The mechanical radar can also perform the same tasks by constantly rotating for search mode, or gimbal lock at the direction of the target for tracking. The biggest advantage for the phased arry radar is, they can switch between the those two modes at very rapid speed, because they dont need to physically rotates. This allows them to have much higher performance in a mode called Track while scan(TWS), which means the radar tracks mutiple known targets, while maintain the ability to detect new targets, which is great for situational awareness on the battlefield.

    • @thecloneguyz
      @thecloneguyz 10 месяцев назад

      Unfortunately you have to find somebody else that likes making videos out of love and passion not just quantity of videos for profit

    • @mathijeba5375
      @mathijeba5375 9 месяцев назад

      @@thecloneguyz no ai telly is a great you tube channel i love this channel because it's the only channel that reads my comment and replies to it
      Unfortunately we need money to make these type of content

  • @satishstha6317
    @satishstha6317 10 месяцев назад

    Awesome video with amazing detail.Could you please make a video on how a fusion bomb works.....😊😊😊

  • @vivekrohar9485
    @vivekrohar9485 8 месяцев назад +1

    amazing sir

  • @elident7828
    @elident7828 5 месяцев назад +1

    Damn 24 volts and destruction beyond imagination … kinda silly when you think about like that… another great animation and video; I always wanted a play by play synopsis of what’s happening during this destructive process… question were there any cameras that actually were fast enough to catch each phase of the detonation ?

  • @craigcashman2275
    @craigcashman2275 5 месяцев назад

    Brilliant

  • @IHORSHCHERBAN
    @IHORSHCHERBAN 10 месяцев назад

    Good job.

  • @communard-mx6rb
    @communard-mx6rb 10 месяцев назад +1

    great how to! mine's almost complete

  • @adbell3364
    @adbell3364 9 месяцев назад

    Very cool!

  • @blackoutalmaty3905
    @blackoutalmaty3905 10 месяцев назад +1

    Last two videos is very Nice

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks 👍

  • @cookingstreet9362
    @cookingstreet9362 10 месяцев назад +1

    I bet that AI TELLY will make a full animation movie on Oppenheimer after making 2 atomic bomb videos 😂

  • @jonathanlai3073
    @jonathanlai3073 10 месяцев назад +7

    Considering this was made in the analog era, all these (failsafe) sensors working together is the hallmark of UNFATHOMABLE COMPLEX engineering. I am IMPRESSED!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +2

      Yes agreed 👍

  • @ttrestle
    @ttrestle 9 месяцев назад +1

    There’s a few things wrong with this video. For example, Seth came up with the idea. The British dude was the one who came up with the shape charge idea to improve upon the initial concept as up to that point they couldn’t get it to work.

  • @kingqbert6819
    @kingqbert6819 9 месяцев назад

    Mind boggling how this was developed!! Harnessing the power of stars in the universe - wow!

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 9 месяцев назад

      Fusion is the power of stars, not fission. Think H-bomb versus A-bomb.

  • @Thebiggestdingus
    @Thebiggestdingus 9 месяцев назад +1

    My friend: ‘it’s just a prank’! The prank:

  • @marcusorillius6971
    @marcusorillius6971 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you for saying “NUMBER” before each number, I would have been confused otherwise thinking they were letters.

  • @Phil-D83
    @Phil-D83 10 месяцев назад +1

    Do one on the castle bravo fusion weapon, and the subsequent salted bomb variants

  • @NickyGi
    @NickyGi 5 месяцев назад

    I wish they explained more of how the bomb was built in the movie.

  • @lsudx479
    @lsudx479 9 месяцев назад

    Oppenheimer was awarded the men's butts discount when he traveled to England.

  • @EpicThe112
    @EpicThe112 10 месяцев назад

    Same process as the Little Boy which both weapons require the bombardier/gunner to actually remove the pin. Today's version the Bunker Buster B61-12 strategic B83 uses an arming panel to arm and detonate. Maybe do a Tsar Bomba or the British operation Hurricane nuke bomb. The operation Hurricane bomb works like the Mk90 present day Russian 90R Nuke depth bomb

  • @roquefortfiles
    @roquefortfiles 2 месяца назад

    Material the size of your morning grapefruit demolishes a city.

  • @tandemcompound2
    @tandemcompound2 9 месяцев назад +2

    excellent animation. one tip. slow down. take your time between steps, constructs. let the view had time to adjust and understand. ie make the video 10 minutes long

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  9 месяцев назад

      Ok understood 🙏👍

  • @TheLinuxYes
    @TheLinuxYes 10 месяцев назад +1

    weapons grade uranium/plutonium in the morning smells like victory course, we know how that war turned out.

  • @robertfousch2703
    @robertfousch2703 3 месяца назад

    You show uranium undergoing fission in your final animation sequence but this is a plutonium bomb.

  • @mynameisyasser
    @mynameisyasser 8 месяцев назад

    Good stuff

  • @noyfub
    @noyfub 9 месяцев назад

    Good Job.

  • @Aitelly
    @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад +5

    Please Subs
    We love you Guys!
    even our Haters too!

  • @housevil2
    @housevil2 9 месяцев назад +1

    Common knowledge to us now, but imagine sending this video back in time to 1941.

  • @ARKHAMxMaverick
    @ARKHAMxMaverick 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you, I walked away feeling I almost understood this.

  • @chadtopia
    @chadtopia 9 месяцев назад

    great video

  • @jasonl_
    @jasonl_ 5 месяцев назад

    Great video with a very accurate explanation. I'm not sure the high explosives were actually comprised of two layers, rather, the slow HX fitted inside the fast HX at the bottom of the lens, but that's a minor detail. Also, Jon Von Neumann is pronounced Noyman but again, a minor quibble in an otherwise excellent video.

  • @seanmarkovich7563
    @seanmarkovich7563 10 месяцев назад +1

    I thought they removed green plugs and placed in red ones? Or did they just pull three two red on green as shown?

  • @chadx8269
    @chadx8269 10 месяцев назад

    Nice animation. @5:25 should be one neutron hits a plutonium 239 atom results...

  • @darthcheeseburger
    @darthcheeseburger 10 месяцев назад

    Amazing video. I wish they had taken some time to explain the inner workings of the bomb in the film. It would've been helpful to better understand it.

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 9 месяцев назад +1

      They would have lost 90% of the audience, which has the attention span of butterflies.