I have an utmost admiration for his deep understanding of Sanatan Dharma... He is so articulate n we'll spoken.... Thnku sir for enlightening us... 🙏🙏🙏
There is difference between religion and dharma . Dharma is one and eternal sanatana . Righteousness is dharma . Religion may have fraction of dharma . Religion has goals .
My dear friends there is a family in India who's GOD family which includes every messenger of all religions. In this family includes Lord KRISHNA, GOD kalki . It's very true mind it - kalki avatar
Dear David..Vamadeva please let the world know about the old testament the direction given by some god to not spare the enemy ,stoning people to death, to exterminate races
No,Its mis-understanding by you,,In Heaven it was for SPIRITS PHYSICALITY not as on Earth..Flesh has some desires But SPIRIT which qualified to be in heaven by salvation Filled with GODLY Entities where GOD IS SPIRIT and we must worship him with TRUTH&SPIRIT...
I feel very sad for Hinduism because they wanna debate religion inspite Hinduism is not a religion We can not debate with the Abrahamic religions about religion because Hinduism is simply not a religion but more a writing of stories and philosophy The Abrahamic religions therefore don't see it as necessary to debate with hindoes about religion.
Gautam budha is not in the 10 avatara of Vishnu. Pls stop the wrong information being spread . All the 10 avatara believe in god and god realisation, whereas Gautam budha only believed in self realisation and did not believe in concept of god !!!!
Vamadeva Shastri aka David Frawley, didn't read Shankaracharya nor Kumarila Bhatt; no wonder he denies the existence of "dogma" in what he calls Sanatana Dharma. Such pathetic attempts at re-defining Hindu-religion(s) showcases the desperation of neo-Hindus to make their religion(s) palatable to the modern-society. If only Vamdeva can define (and quote) "dharma" as was defined by Kumarila Bhatt, Shankaracharya et al. we would see the compounded lies in the words of Frawley. Well, so much on this can be said but nevertheless some other time. Also, the representation of "Abrahamic faith" was in-accurate for example Islam doesn't claim to be an "Abhrahimic faith" rather "Adamic faith". Similarly, Christianity is much more than the "Bible" - ex. Roman Catholics and the papacy. Same with the Jews, who are divided into several cults and sects. It seems that these courses by "Centre for Indic Studies" are merely un-academic propaganda material lacking essential facts. A civilised, real and critical study of different faiths with objectivity is required not "propaganda" against other faiths. This will only weaken the stature of the propagandist, nothing more.
@Vidya , Abraham is a prophet in Islam just like Jesus, Jacob, Noah and Adam. So, would you call Islam Jesuit-faith, Jacobite-faith or Noahmite-faith? Jesus is an extremely important figure in Islam, who is prophesied to return to the world at the end of times according to Islamic eschatology. So, why not Jesuit-faith? Its erroneous to claim Islam is an "Abrahamic faith", to put it into a nutshell. This myth of "Abrahamic faith" being intolerant than pagan-faiths like Hindu-religion(s) is an old-saga without any strong basis in history.
@@avartan5843 , I think you should read history in reference to Rigveda. How did the early vedic "aryas" spread their religion? Read Rigveda and you'll find the answers from the works of the colleagues of Vamadeva Shastri. Note, I'm not referring to the AIT or OIT theory specifically. Rigveda, itself is a huge repository of violence committed by Hindu-Aryas against non-Hindu an-aryas, just in the name of religion. By the way, if you referring to the supposed "forceful conversion" of Indians by Muslims then non-historical as stated by almost almost modern historians - not just "marxists" as Vamadeva and his colleagues allege. This is the reason a critical attitudes towards such subjects needs to be adopted to see India in the light of data available.
@Vidya , Well, even Vivekananda claims to be follower of the only "true religion" - and his conception of "God" (as propounded in Vedanta) to be truest. So did Shankaracharya, Kumarila Bhatta, Abhinava Gupta and all others held their "conception" of God to be true. I don't see Hindu-religion(s) different from Islam, Christianity and Judaism, in this aspect. That is, in claiming to be holding on to the right "conception" of God and the "true religion". This Neo-Hinduism or new-age Hinduism which several Hindu-fundamentalists have been propounding in the face of 'modernity' and challenges from rival religions like Islam, Christianity and Judaism can fool a gora who hasn't read basic works on Vedanta, Mimamsa and Shaiva Siddhanta. Not anyone who has himself/herself read the works of Hindu-philosophers mentioned above.
Lol. Your insecurity is showing. You can't change the fact that Sanatan Dharma is the only true path. It doesn't command you to kill or convert non believers
Mr. Devdutt himself is one of the greatest misinterpreters of Sanatana Dharma. He makes various mistakes by oversimplifying Sanskrit terms and Dharmic ideology.
![Lethal Company Music Video 🎵 "Follow The Orders" [VERSION A]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QeooZB4Z7RA/mqdefault.jpg)
One should study as much as possible but only dive inside to know the truth 🙏🙏🙏
Very true
Huge Repect to You Sir.
David sums it precisely🙏
Not David, Neel Ram Das.
ruclips.net/video/3jt0qigDEbI/видео.html
Avatar
I have an utmost admiration for his deep understanding of Sanatan Dharma... He is so articulate n we'll spoken.... Thnku sir for enlightening us... 🙏🙏🙏
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 Simple and strongly defined between Abramic religion and Darmic religion (Bharhamic religion) thank you very much Sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏
A wise Soul...thank you Sir
Salute sir !! Thank you for hardwork !!!
This is Amazing... David Ji is Great!!
Dr Frawley on fire! 🔥 🙌🏼
Please bring more and more on this topic. It is heling the burning wounds.
A nuanced explanation. Thank you.🦢🦢🦢🙏🙏
Amazing explanation peaceful thought 👌🏻👌🏻Jai Shree Krishna🙏🏻💐😇
He nicely explained what we as Hindus can't say bcz we don't say harsh truths
In love with this Channel the great.
Arun Rathore
ruclips.net/video/3jt0qigDEbI/видео.html
Avatar
plz keep up the good work
सत्य की खोज
ruclips.net/video/3jt0qigDEbI/видео.html
Avatar
Love u sir .
My salutation to the Great man great.vedantist great scholar
Enlightning
Vishal Pradhan
ruclips.net/video/3jt0qigDEbI/видео.html
Avatar
Great you are vaman shashtriji. Great DAVid Frawley sir
There is difference between religion and dharma . Dharma is one and eternal sanatana . Righteousness is dharma . Religion may have fraction of dharma . Religion has goals .
'Mess'iahs are responsible for the mess...
Yes .so true
Well Said !! ☺😊👌👌
Likewise Shiva banged mohini with lust ....
@Cutting edgeI am christian , go and fuck paravti ....
@@subhajitmakhal7307 what about your sins?
Very beautifully explained and clearly differentiated
Well said Dr, Frawley Sir !
सॉरी सर मोहम्मद एज नॉट इवन ए ह्यूमन बीइंग
So nice to see you Pranaam
❤❤❤ Beautiful explanation. Inner knowing is the best knowing, but we don't know how to have inner knowing as we are more outward bound.
Pranaam dhanyavaad Namahaste
Truly wonderfully explained & insightful
Very well explained. Very informative.
Beautiful.. respect sir 🙏
🙏 Namste.
excellent
Welcome in truth of soul of hinduism
Eating dinner and listening
Pranam guruji
Shree Vamadeva Shasthri🙏
Jai Shree Ram
Namaskar
AUM ❤🙏
So true
Well explained
Hindus are inclusive but do the abrahamic religions want to be included or will they include us without conversion.
🙏
Your Smile says Sanatan is great,old and real.
🚩
In Hinduism we believe we all are Gods son and everyone can direct got message from God by devotion or meditation and can realise God
Nope. We are the divine, TAT TVAM ASI, you are THAT, Aham Brahmasmi, I am THAT Brahman!
The abrahamic doctrines some of which are simply cruel
My dear friends there is a family in India who's GOD family which includes every messenger of all religions. In this family includes Lord KRISHNA, GOD kalki . It's very true mind it - kalki avatar
A savior is not an Avatar. A guru is not required to have realization. A rishi will has realization. Guru is not a messenger/savior/prophet.
A guru is a guide a teacher
Har har mahadev
🙏🙏🙏
True hindu
When did the name hindu come into the texts of Sanatan REGARDS ereshva
Dear David..Vamadeva please let the world know about the old testament the direction given by some god to not spare the enemy ,stoning people to death, to exterminate races
Nice
Materialistic people become non-Hindu and people who are non materialistic become Hindu
Prophet = Messiah = ऋषि (Rushi) !
Totally wrong
In abramik God have propet..,,be A masengger ..,buat in santhsn ..God be Avatar .,like Sun with light....,light is a energi of sun ..
RUclips पर "एक व्यक्ति जिसने हिन्दू राष्ट्र को नष्ट किया। भाग-2 A MAN WHO DESTROYED THE HINDU NATION." देखें
ruclips.net/video/2ZT2P18MI5Q/видео.html
Salvation by proxy... That is so true... very funny too
Didn't know that Israel is in the West! How can you say that Christianity, Judaism & Muslim faiths are western?
West to india
No,Its mis-understanding by you,,In Heaven it was for SPIRITS PHYSICALITY not as on Earth..Flesh has some desires But SPIRIT which qualified to be in heaven by salvation Filled with GODLY Entities where GOD IS SPIRIT and we must worship him with TRUTH&SPIRIT...
I feel very sad for Hinduism because they wanna debate religion inspite Hinduism is not a religion
We can not debate with the Abrahamic religions about religion because Hinduism is simply not a religion but more a writing of stories and philosophy
The Abrahamic religions therefore don't see it as necessary to debate with hindoes about religion.
One book one prophet religions are unscientific, inhuman and barbaric.
Gautam budha is not in the 10 avatara of Vishnu. Pls stop the wrong information being spread . All the 10 avatara believe in god and god realisation, whereas Gautam budha only believed in self realisation and did not believe in concept of god !!!!
in some traditions it is the Vishnu Avatara- bodhisatva
Sowmiya Dinesh - Correct and totally agree with you
Pragya T. Gupta - Unfortunately those traditions are incorrect.
@@RK-dj4xb may be..But they do have..There is no fixed way of seeing things. That's what Dr. David is saying.
do you know more than puranas...Bhagavatha clearly says Lord Bhudda was an avatar of the Lord Vishnu.
You are full of beliefs not real knowledge
What is real knowledge, Christianity? Isn't it just your belief
Vamadeva Shastri aka David Frawley, didn't read Shankaracharya nor Kumarila Bhatt; no wonder he denies the existence of "dogma" in what he calls Sanatana Dharma. Such pathetic attempts at re-defining Hindu-religion(s) showcases the desperation of neo-Hindus to make their religion(s) palatable to the modern-society.
If only Vamdeva can define (and quote) "dharma" as was defined by Kumarila Bhatt, Shankaracharya et al. we would see the compounded lies in the words of Frawley. Well, so much on this can be said but nevertheless some other time.
Also, the representation of "Abrahamic faith" was in-accurate for example Islam doesn't claim to be an "Abhrahimic faith" rather "Adamic faith". Similarly, Christianity is much more than the "Bible" - ex. Roman Catholics and the papacy. Same with the Jews, who are divided into several cults and sects.
It seems that these courses by "Centre for Indic Studies" are merely un-academic propaganda material lacking essential facts. A civilised, real and critical study of different faiths with objectivity is required not "propaganda" against other faiths. This will only weaken the stature of the propagandist, nothing more.
At least dharmic don't convert peoples forcefully
@Vidya , Abraham is a prophet in Islam just like Jesus, Jacob, Noah and Adam. So, would you call Islam Jesuit-faith, Jacobite-faith or Noahmite-faith? Jesus is an extremely important figure in Islam, who is prophesied to return to the world at the end of times according to Islamic eschatology. So, why not Jesuit-faith? Its erroneous to claim Islam is an "Abrahamic faith", to put it into a nutshell.
This myth of "Abrahamic faith" being intolerant than pagan-faiths like Hindu-religion(s) is an old-saga without any strong basis in history.
@@avartan5843 ,
I think you should read history in reference to Rigveda. How did the early vedic "aryas" spread their religion? Read Rigveda and you'll find the answers from the works of the colleagues of Vamadeva Shastri. Note, I'm not referring to the AIT or OIT theory specifically. Rigveda, itself is a huge repository of violence committed by Hindu-Aryas against non-Hindu an-aryas, just in the name of religion.
By the way, if you referring to the supposed "forceful conversion" of Indians by Muslims then non-historical as stated by almost almost modern historians - not just "marxists" as Vamadeva and his colleagues allege. This is the reason a critical attitudes towards such subjects needs to be adopted to see India in the light of data available.
@Vidya ,
Well, even Vivekananda claims to be follower of the only "true religion" - and his conception of "God" (as propounded in Vedanta) to be truest. So did Shankaracharya, Kumarila Bhatta, Abhinava Gupta and all others held their "conception" of God to be true.
I don't see Hindu-religion(s) different from Islam, Christianity and Judaism, in this aspect. That is, in claiming to be holding on to the right "conception" of God and the "true religion".
This Neo-Hinduism or new-age Hinduism which several Hindu-fundamentalists have been propounding in the face of 'modernity' and challenges from rival religions like Islam, Christianity and Judaism can fool a gora who hasn't read basic works on Vedanta, Mimamsa and Shaiva Siddhanta. Not anyone who has himself/herself read the works of Hindu-philosophers mentioned above.
Lol. Your insecurity is showing. You can't change the fact that Sanatan Dharma is the only true path. It doesn't command you to kill or convert non believers
Read Devdutt Pattanaik. He have better explanation about it.
Devdutt Pattanaik is the nd the crypto christain ND the communist ND islamic supporter.
@@ajaysharma6348 😂😂😂 hey ram!
Mr. Devdutt himself is one of the greatest misinterpreters of Sanatana Dharma. He makes various mistakes by oversimplifying Sanskrit terms and Dharmic ideology.
@@eternalbliss3573 Stupid people cannot get him... So chill!
🙏
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏