Playing as BR1 vs BR3 isn't even that bad. Sure your vehicles aren't great but your infantry is still very capable. BR3 vs BR5 on the other hand... Now that's painful.
Nah. It’s entirely possible to beat br3 with br2 and br5 with br3. People just don’t like to admit that Enlisted is a skill based game and that sometimes their opponents are just better than them 🤷
@@puenboy1 not if you have a sherman 75 and the enemy a tiger II. Imho, BR I can fight against III. You will strugle but it is more playable than you in BR III against dudes at BR V.
Enlisted already has a problem with players watching the enemy's battlepass rank and quitting out; presumably deeming the game an unrecoverable loss and not wasting their time with it. Giving people a gauge of players' BR will make that worse.
They really aren't though. When you get BR3 weapons, the highest BR lobbies they put you in is BR 4. They don't even put you in BR5 until you reach at least BR4. This video lies lol
You guys should look into the AI troopers. There are some maps where the AI gets stuck in spawn. It's mainly the Normandy maps where this happens I noticed.
RIght? I've had this problem a few time in a couple different maps, sometimes it just has to do with poor rally point placement though. I selected my largest squad once and it spawned them all glitched and stuck in a wall where I couldn't see or get out so I had to suicide the whole squad lol
The situation with the BR is the vehicles, when you are in BR 3 you face a BR 5 tank and you have nothing to pierce its armor, or the BR 5 planes with their 250 kg bombs, it becomes absurd, why not divide the categories from BR 1 to B2, B2 to B3, B3 to B4 and B4 to B5? At least the gap would not be so huge for those in BR 3, leaving them at an advantage or disadvantage. Well that's what I think
You don't face any BR5 tanks when you're in BR3. My BR is 3 and it says my only possible lobbies are BR2 to BR4. It doesn't even put you in BR5 lobbies at BR3.
Nobody ever said the game was 100% historically accurate. If it were then nobody would play it because people would only be able to play against players with the exact same BR and there would be way too many restrictions on what weapons/vehicles could be used on certain maps and/or against certain opponents. All the weapons and vehicles are from different time periods throughout the war, so some things are bound to be out of place. A lot of the game is historically accurate though, more so than a lot of other war games.
@@MrSeekz-rp3su At least, they can make Enlisted more Historically based, obviously there's no way a WW2 FPS game can be made historically accurate, but at least they could try to be more historically based
BR is completely against historical accurate. In early BR testing, equipment theater based map preference matchmaking is the true way of historical accurate and somewhat BR system
There's actually no reason a KV 1 shouldn't be able to take out a Tiger IIH depending on the situation. For one, if the Tiger isn't going 1 on 1 against the KV-1, that gives some advantage to the KV. Especially if the Tiger is distracted by other enemies and doesn't see the KV coming. Secondly, the KV, while still considered a heavy tank, is much lighter than the Tiger, which makes if MUCH faster, meaning it potentially out maneuver the Tiger while returning fire. There are a lot of variables to factor in when determining if a KV-1 can take out a Tiger IIH. That been said, in a straight 1 on 1 with a skilled tanker team and no other distractions, the Tiger would definitely stomp the KV hands down.
What they really need to fix is not being able to call airstrikes in the grey zones. If they made it so radio operators could call in an artillery or air strikes in the grey zone, it would be a nice counter to all the assholes who just like to camp the greyzon with tanks the whole time every game.
That's actually reflected in real war. You will not always fight the enemy with the same calibre if not otherwise. But rest assured if the enemy is capable of using a Tiger 2, there is someone in your team capable of using IS-2, just pray that he ain't stupid as equipping his single soldiers an STG44 while having the rest of his squad use bolt-action rifle.
Could you also save soldier's weapons and equipment in presets, not just vehicles and soldiers? Kinda a bummer having to rearm them after every preset change.
@@jude842HLL is rarely fun it's a dying and camping sim you either die to the enemy that you couldn't see or kill people that couldn't see you. Death by Ninja simulator.
No. You have multiple squads of each kind of infantry and other unit types to use. Use it. Setup Assault teams for each BR level you want. Engee for each BR level you want. Tank crew, airplanes, radio, mgs, flame, mortar, anti-tank, apcs... Setup at least 3 scenarios you want to play. Best BR 2, best BR 3 and best BR 5. Is just that simple😂😂😂 took me months to.figure it out. the fact they drop this video is funny. most people will still not understand and newcomers 😂😂😂 I lead them
@@jakubgadzala7474I do have that, I keep presets for BR 2 3 and 5 as well, also another set of 2 and 5 that is just (premium event squads). I am 100% on almost everything and have all squads(except Stalingrad premium pass) before the merger so I have plenty of squads to chose from.(which is kind of a pain to be honest) Since I got everything done I just mostly play for events and game play, after I reach the Marshal rank on each battle pass these days. It's just I am just board seeing the same thing over and over again, after the merger a lot of guns and vehicles don't get any use at all... and you will see the same set of guns and vehicles that are meta for each BR. You don't see iconic vehicles and equipment that should be on certain maps at all now, especially Moscow.. that is why I am wanting to see campaign(map) and time period based load outs that are balanced by players entire squad strength. that way a squad of 5 troopers can still have one semi auto SVT 38 and rest some bolt action rifles with out having to choose between, is it fall under BR 2 or 3. I just liked the authentic feel I got, when the area and time specific equipment were a thing. Maybe that is just me. Like it was the reason I start playing this game from the start. it was the most authentic WW2 game till the merger in that regard. Still I do love this game and will play for a long time.
BR6 is necessary with how much power creep there is on BR5. AR's vs smg's and Tiger1 = Tiger2 ??? Pls no… they can't remain in the same BR... And we need a proper BR+-2 matchmaker, instead of the BR3 swing without BR2-3-4 matches and br2&4 been BR+-1. (we would then also have BR4-5-6 and BR3-4-5) This system combined with matchmaker limits to keep an equal power level between teams (~30% max BR4 players per team in a BR2-3-4 match) (narrow to BR+-1 when a BR is overcrowded) will allow for better balance while retaining equpment variety (no BR5 vs only BR5 exept when everyone and th!%$#^% is spamming BR5...).
I really like the system, but it could be better if instead of making an squad match the exact tier of the highest grade weapon, even if all the others are a lower tier, it could be more rounded, like for example, 1 tier V weapon and the remaining as tier I-II, so instead of jumping into tier V it could be a tier III army instead, so you do not discard like the golden weapons that end up in waste.
@@Warmaster_24 so why are you crying about tiers 😒 also there are tier 1 machines guns, rifles and anti tank rifles so dude just get better at the game lol.
I never understood why the Campaigns were removed... Now you have to always change the squads if you want to use a unit that fought elsewhere. I can't have Afrika Korps and Stalingrad units together, it doesn't make sense.
I'm still waiting for Italian P40 and Lewis gun for the Allies... Also give us Matilda Hedgehog premium and put basic Matilda into the free unlock tree.
@@takaslatra I play BR3 and it's fine, exept when you face the best BR"5" has to offer. Even BR4 struggles with BR"5" stuff. Like, the diff between the PPsh stick vs drum mag is not that much wider that the diff betwen it and the Fedorov… And for tanks, the situation is desperate. TigerE = Tiger II(H) ??? WTF? A T-34 85 can deal with a TigerE, but it should rarely face the Tiger II(H) (and no BR3 should ever face it)… The BR3 vs BR4 is bad only against the germans (i wish my BR3 tanks had the firepower of the Pz.IV J when i'm shooting at the Panther's turret)
1:00 so if you just made a video about how the BR system currently works, which is terrible, and the entire community hates it, does that mean you are not planning to change it in the near future? Don't get me wrong, I LOVE this game, but there is only two BRs that make sense to play, BR2 and BR5... you MUST implement +1/-1 Matchmaking otherwise this game will die... if you put new players against BR3 they will lose their taste for the game incredibly quickly... Also playing BR3 makes absolutely no sense if you want to win, you have no real chance against competent BR5 players. Please STOP this madness already
wait i think i know you 😅, aren’t you the typical players who don’t rush zones and only get 15 kills in a 30 min match also don’t destroy tanks or do anything to help in the war 😂😢😢😢 now i realize yes is true matchup is broke you should get in bots only matches so you can have fun 🤣.
Whole BR system kill this game for me. I played since game launch, but after thay add br system I tried it and oh may its sooooo bad. You cant play on cool maps with cool weapons aeverything is tied to BR. You get used to play moscow with ppsha and dp-29 not anymore go play berlin/stalingrad (I hate city maps in this game). Overall all hope for this game is lost, it was fun anyway. Its just sad seeing this update didnt changed player count but made many players leave.
It would be cool if there was a BR3 bonus to silver and experience, that might draw more people to BR3 and make it less likely to join with BR1, BR4, and BR5 players.
Excellent. This was very informative. Thank you, Darkflow and Gaijin. 🫡 It'd be really nice if BRs were added to the squad filter, and we could select combinations of squad types, as well as squad BRs. 👍 Also, I just gotta say, Enlisted's visual quality is becoming absolutely gorgeous. ❤
I have a very bad thing which happened have a mixture between rank three and rank two, which means I can be fighting rank. Two people are rank five people
No we need Rally points to be removed from Game, they are bs and ruin all matches and the gameplay. If one Team has more serious players who run around like idiots putting that shit here and there in hard to reach and find places, other team is fcked. Game should be about Warfare, killing and shooting, not building some sci-fi spawn points. I hate running around having to find some dumb rally built in attic or other hard to reach place, or when dsome dickhead puts mine on spawn, real fun gameplay. They should be restricted to be built by engineers in pre-determined places ass alternative spawns. AS in the Engineers set up a forward post like that, maybe 1-2 extra locations to be built ofr each cap as alternative spawns for match to be interesting. Unrestricted spawns being able to be built anywhere is tupid and annoying asf
Separate BR3 from BR1-2 and have them fight vs BR4 and BR3 only, Separate BR5 from all BRs since they gear is so superior to anything else in the game. BR1-BR2 BR3-BR4 BR5-BR5
They kind of already did. This video lies. When your BR is 3, it only puts you in BR2, BR3, and BR4 lobbies. It doesn't even put you BR 5 until you reach at least BR4. So BR3 is already separate from BR1 and BR5 is already separate from everything except for BR 4.
Only if WW2 are going to be separate from Cold War gear. If it's the same as WT i'm quitting the game i'm tired of overpowered Heatfs vs my Tigers in WT.
@@krle7970 Of course that's not going to happen. they wouldn't mix 2 different eras into the same battles. It is very likely Cold War will get added as a a higher br at some point. but it will only be paired with cold war stuff. so for like a Korean war, they would probably add late WW2 Shermans and Pershings into the South, and the North would get T-34-85s as well as IS-3s and they would have to give the North Mig-15s and the South would get P80 shooting stars, and late ww2 mustangs.
@@SirJohannRoyale what do you mean? The reason for the br system was to balance the battel better but if k/d isnt a factor it will never get balanced...
@@SirJohannRoyale øhh its a game we are talking about. Lol And the br system now is for match making but a big gun doesnt mean you can use it well , Why do you sound like someone with many hrs and good but not skilled enough to only play with the big dogs
@theelmogame when the Australians fought in ww2 they were battling in the same places as the Americans, so they would have been mixed in with U.S. soldiers, battles that are already represented in game. As for Canada, while they did play roles in ww2, albeit not very big ones, they mainly just fought against the French. That was technically a different war that started BEFORE ww2 and a little bit later expanded into ww2. Most of the largest, and most notable battles involved the four nations represented in game. The US, Germany, USSR, and Japan. So they actually did very well with the overall representation.
Funny to face BR III tanks while you playing with BR II and funny to face BR V tanks when you playing with BR III tank. This definitely should be reworked into 3 separate br categories: I-II, III-IV and V
Facing BR3 tanks when you play BR2 is how uptiers should work. Facing BR"5" (BR6 really) tanks when you are playing with a BR3 tank is mostly an issue of BR compression. We just need BR5 decompression into BR6 and a proper BR+-2 matchmaker for all BR's… It will stop BR3 from seeing AR's and King tigers while not forcing BR1 to fight itself exclusively (and we avoid the cod clone that BR"5" vs BR"5" spam will become if you isolate it).
No you can take a squad that unlocks with a br 4 weapon and equip them with br 1 weapons and have the squad become br 1. Basically what br the weapon is. Doesn’t work with premium squads because you are stuck with their weapon, can’t take it away
I play the game yesterday, play conquest, map Mansion(Moscow) as USSR. Play as BR 2. But I gonna ask, how the heck there is Tiger II type H in the lowest BR. I don't lie, it take most of our team to handle that behemoth. Like how on earth that BR V tank is in BR1-3 game. If player can bring BR V tank to lower BR 1-2. That's mean they exploiting the error or bugs. And I hope and wish they got ban for it. Second, this game should delayed tank and plane spawn for 4 minutes. So the player can have a full confrontation battle rather than getting kill in earlier game for no reason. Like as defender in any mods, we can't even fortify the base because knowing there is a lazy bum going to camping in greyzone. And last, separated the BR 3 from BR 1-2 and 4-5. I hope soon the update is focus more on quality gameplay update. New features can wait for while, just make the game better for players instead.
wait i think i know you 😅, aren’t you the typical players who don’t rush zones and only get 15 kills in a 30 min match also don’t destroy tanks or do anything to help in the war 😂😢😢😢 now i realize yes is true matchup is broke you should get in bots only matches so you can have fun 🤣.
@@krle7970 i know it hurt to suck at the game is ok brother soon devs will fix that mmr for you so you can have more bots lobby so you can feel like a pro 🤝☺️👍
BR 3 is the best the game can offer, you get all maps, you have a 70% chance of having equal teams or enemy ai teams which makes fun., Then there is a 30% chance of beeing out of place because your br is to low br1-2 you can be better as your enemys but your team mostly consits of ai. the normal ratio is 3 human players 7 ai br 4-5 you encounter 90% of the time only no lifers ruining the game but 10% of the time you get realy amazing battles it is sad tho that you cant get the moskau maps as br 5. would be great if this would still be possible in br 4-5 battles
Nah separate BR5 as their own BR, and put BR1 vs 2 and BR 3 vs 4 only. PS Put Moscow maps in higher BRs they don't really look like early Moscow maps anyway.
@@robawtrob8399With Steam launch they should have enough people for separating BR3 from BR1-2, for BR5 probably not. If you won't protect newbies from overpowered BR3 gear then population will never grow since they will be leaving at mass after first 10 easy initial bot matches that on the 11th it'll turn into a hell on earth that they were never prepared for.
Nah, decompress BR5 into BR6 and add a proper Br+-2 matchmaker for all BR's, then limit the top BR of a match to ~30% to not have them stomp and you will end up with a much healthier game. Decoupling/isolating BR's from eachother hurts balance and variety, because you are killing any interaction between BR's (and will make it MUCH more difficult for newbies to climb the tech tree (getting thrown into a completely different matchmaker every time you advance a tier? Nah)) The whole premise of a BR system with uptiers/downtiers is that you don't constantly face equal opponents with the same stuff, you instead face a wider range of equipment that can be superior or inferior to yours (or both). If we wanna kill that instead of fixing it to work properly then why we got it (BR system) in the first place?
Could you guys make premium tank squads able to change the camo pattern of the tank. The flame tanks are premiums but those are the only premiums you can change the camo on, what is that?
the number of things that the player must know and keep in mind is DEVASTATING. The icing on the cake is tier 2 =/= br 2, could this be made more confusing?
Just release your new br6 at steam launch. Make 2 match making brackets. A new player going against flamethrowers with bolt actions on defense is so depressing.
Maybe they will do this after the steam launch, at the moment the player count is to low. So that would either mean more bots to fill the team, or have longer waiting times. (They said his last november or december, the article is still on their website)
That's not the issue. The swingy nature of the half ass implementation of BR3's BR system that lacks BR2-3-4 matches AND the powercreep of BR5 (BR6 plz.) is the problem here. We don't even have a proper BR matchmaker and most people think that breaking it even further will fix it… We need BR5 decompression into BR6 and a proper BR+-2 matchmaker for all BR's to fix this…
Battle Rating sucks. Year of service with according maps and that's it. Their way of Rating sucks, doesn't consider what year nor what type of weapon vehicle for what role, and this with maps going anywhere is bs. historical Immersion is key and all for a WW2 Squad FPS
I'm just stuck in BRII because anything higher becomes ridiculous. So in effect I've lost half the game and maps. Get rid of the fool who thought this crap up.
Historical accuracy was ditched with the merge... Playing BR 3 with any faction other than USA is very stupid idea too, we need a rework of matchmaking ASAP!
wait i think i know you 😅, aren’t you the typical players who don’t rush zones and only get 15 kills in a 30 min match also don’t destroy tanks or do anything to help in the war 😂😢😢😢 now i realize yes is true matchup is broke you should get in bots only matches so you can have fun 🤣.
The current battle rating is cancer. BR-3 seal clubbers will either be sodomizing BR-1 players or being sodomized by BR-5. BR 1-5 should all be separate queues, we have enough players to support 5 separate battle rating queues across all campaigns and servers.
Only if they add more maps, otherwise Rank 5 will barely have any map rotation. In fact, this game needs more maps for all br's. (Other than that i do like the new system)
@@TheTryingDutchman there is already a lot of maps. The problem is the rotation that put players at the same couple maps. For example, I had a played a lot americans tier V in these days and most of the maps were bulge. Like 70/80% of the times.
Quand pourra t on choisir sa campagne !!! Ou mieux : l'ancien sisteme ! Parce que la ont frole la mediocrité, (perso j avais 2000h de jeu et j ai arreter a cause de cette mise a jour majeur comme pas mal de monde)
It really is trash. It doesn't help matchmake at all. In the 6 campaign version it was so much fun. I didn't give a damn other people had progress stuff because it only took a little playing to get some things. And you could always pickup someones 100 round tommy gun and destroy their squad. Complete skill issue. The game is totally ruined now, I tried to get friends to play and it was too confusing. Had we been able to just queue for a specific campaign it would not be a problem..and the tech tree is overcomplicated compared to the staged one which was better.
The battle rating system is ass, it should be rank based match making, 1-20 21-30 31-40 , this would prevent veteran players from exploiting mechanics and seal clubbing.
Such a broken system. It means you essentially have to stay at BR2 until you're BR 5 ready. I've completed unlocked everything up to BR4, even got some premium BR4 items from the battle pass, yet I still play BR2. When steam releases this needs to be changed. Terrible design
And then y end up in a unbalanced shit filled with screaming kids, no engineers and why should i mark a tank. The Christmastree of achieving weapons is a laughter.
The worst game no balance Germans and soviet only lasers weapons missing, Thompson is one weapon from British and Americans the give to soviet, the soviet never use one capitalism weapon even the realistic no exist, the machine gun weapons from
as a real pro player of this game all i can say is that everything is balance and good the problems here are the players brains 🤣 🤣 i don’t think devs can balance that 🤣 🤣.
Bro nobody wants to play br 5 in br3. That's just ass. Unless you have a br 5 squad then you shouldn't see higher than 3 why tf do you keep adding up tiers. Tier 1 faces tier 1 tier two faces tier one and two Tier 3 faces two and three Tier 4 faces tier 4 and five faces five. This is the balance players want
@@SirJohannRoyale I have 1300 hours in enlisted good sir. I've been playing this game for 3 years. I average over 100 kills a game. I've seen when the game was good and when it was bad. Right now it's dog shit.
That's just stale spam of everyone having the same things… A wider, proper BR+-2 with BR decompression is ehat we need. AS to what will face what in a proper BR system? Here: BR1-2 BR1-2-3 BR2-3-4 BR3-4-5 BR4-5-6 BR5-6 (and BRx-y when a BR is overcrowded)
BR 3 is Schrodinger's Cat. You are going to stomp or about to get stomped depending on the match maker.
Playing as BR1 vs BR3 isn't even that bad. Sure your vehicles aren't great but your infantry is still very capable. BR3 vs BR5 on the other hand... Now that's painful.
Nah. It’s entirely possible to beat br3 with br2 and br5 with br3. People just don’t like to admit that Enlisted is a skill based game and that sometimes their opponents are just better than them 🤷
@@puenboy1 not if you have a sherman 75 and the enemy a tiger II. Imho, BR I can fight against III. You will strugle but it is more playable than you in BR III against dudes at BR V.
@@crazyonmyblock5956Use dynamite 😅
@@jakubgadzala7474 Try do this in a greyzone tank or even a tank a bit behind enemy infantary.
Please display current match BR on the scoreboard in-game so players can know what to expect in the battle
Sadly that will lead to a bunch of weenies leaving the match when they see they're fully uptiered.
I doubt they're going to add that because it would lead to outcries about the matchmaker on reddit and the forum.
pls post that on the enlisted forums where they might actually read it.
Enlisted already has a problem with players watching the enemy's battlepass rank and quitting out; presumably deeming the game an unrecoverable loss and not wasting their time with it. Giving people a gauge of players' BR will make that worse.
Too many people would be deserting
My favorite part is how BR3 guns are somehow rated much higher when it comes to matchmaking. LOVE THAT.
They really aren't though. When you get BR3 weapons, the highest BR lobbies they put you in is BR 4. They don't even put you in BR5 until you reach at least BR4. This video lies lol
@@MrSeekz-rp3su so it just says IV-V on matchmaking but only ever puts you in IV?
You guys should look into the AI troopers. There are some maps where the AI gets stuck in spawn. It's mainly the Normandy maps where this happens I noticed.
RIght? I've had this problem a few time in a couple different maps, sometimes it just has to do with poor rally point placement though. I selected my largest squad once and it spawned them all glitched and stuck in a wall where I couldn't see or get out so I had to suicide the whole squad lol
The situation with the BR is the vehicles, when you are in BR 3 you face a BR 5 tank and you have nothing to pierce its armor, or the BR 5 planes with their 250 kg bombs, it becomes absurd, why not divide the categories from BR 1 to B2, B2 to B3, B3 to B4 and B4 to B5? At least the gap would not be so huge for those in BR 3, leaving them at an advantage or disadvantage. Well that's what I think
You don't face any BR5 tanks when you're in BR3. My BR is 3 and it says my only possible lobbies are BR2 to BR4. It doesn't even put you in BR5 lobbies at BR3.
Give us historical roundels and insignia!
Much needed video to explain BR 🔥
🔥🗿
Not really, I think anyone could gather this from in game....
1:28 soo, you mean IS-2 1944 at Battle of Stalingrad is historical accurate?
*Battle of Stalingrad is 1942-1943
If they keep throwing the phrase "historically accurate" around, then they deserve this kind of nitpicking imo
Nobody ever said the game was 100% historically accurate. If it were then nobody would play it because people would only be able to play against players with the exact same BR and there would be way too many restrictions on what weapons/vehicles could be used on certain maps and/or against certain opponents. All the weapons and vehicles are from different time periods throughout the war, so some things are bound to be out of place. A lot of the game is historically accurate though, more so than a lot of other war games.
@@MrSeekz-rp3su At least, they can make Enlisted more Historically based, obviously there's no way a WW2 FPS game can be made historically accurate, but at least they could try to be more historically based
BR is completely against historical accurate. In early BR testing, equipment theater based map preference matchmaking is the true way of historical accurate and somewhat BR system
Finland for Axis would be a game changer for this game
Right now a panzer IIc can fight against a KV 1.
That same KV1 can fight against a Tiger IIH.
Fix this shit
There's actually no reason a KV 1 shouldn't be able to take out a Tiger IIH depending on the situation. For one, if the Tiger isn't going 1 on 1 against the KV-1, that gives some advantage to the KV. Especially if the Tiger is distracted by other enemies and doesn't see the KV coming. Secondly, the KV, while still considered a heavy tank, is much lighter than the Tiger, which makes if MUCH faster, meaning it potentially out maneuver the Tiger while returning fire. There are a lot of variables to factor in when determining if a KV-1 can take out a Tiger IIH. That been said, in a straight 1 on 1 with a skilled tanker team and no other distractions, the Tiger would definitely stomp the KV hands down.
What they really need to fix is not being able to call airstrikes in the grey zones. If they made it so radio operators could call in an artillery or air strikes in the grey zone, it would be a nice counter to all the assholes who just like to camp the greyzon with tanks the whole time every game.
That's actually reflected in real war. You will not always fight the enemy with the same calibre if not otherwise. But rest assured if the enemy is capable of using a Tiger 2, there is someone in your team capable of using IS-2, just pray that he ain't stupid as equipping his single soldiers an STG44 while having the rest of his squad use bolt-action rifle.
Could you also save soldier's weapons and equipment in presets, not just vehicles and soldiers? Kinda a bummer having to rearm them after every preset change.
You actually can do that, there are presets for soldiers.
@@kubikcz7501oh i mustve missed that, thanks!
This is gonna be fun
Sadly no hell let loose
@@jude842 I mean if your looking for a hell let loose experience no you won't find it fun, two very different games
@@BabyBigSwoleCan't argue with that
@@jude842HLL is rarely fun it's a dying and camping sim you either die to the enemy that you couldn't see or kill people that couldn't see you. Death by Ninja simulator.
I think BR should be calculated by the collective strength of your soldiers and equipment.
That would make too much sense.... when you could have 1 solider on 1 squad with a M1 Garand face maxed STG-44 squads....
No. You have multiple squads of each kind of infantry and other unit types to use. Use it. Setup Assault teams for each BR level you want. Engee for each BR level you want. Tank crew, airplanes, radio, mgs, flame, mortar, anti-tank, apcs... Setup at least 3 scenarios you want to play. Best BR 2, best BR 3 and best BR 5. Is just that simple😂😂😂 took me months to.figure it out. the fact they drop this video is funny. most people will still not understand and newcomers 😂😂😂 I lead them
Damn, you can send 3 assault teams for specific BR if you feel hardcore like me 😂😂😂❤ I love this game. Understand the mechanics, learn maps.
@@jakubgadzala7474I do have that, I keep presets for BR 2 3 and 5 as well, also another set of 2 and 5 that is just (premium event squads). I am 100% on almost everything and have all squads(except Stalingrad premium pass) before the merger so I have plenty of squads to chose from.(which is kind of a pain to be honest)
Since I got everything done I just mostly play for events and game play, after I reach the Marshal rank on each battle pass these days. It's just I am just board seeing the same thing over and over again, after the merger a lot of guns and vehicles don't get any use at all... and you will see the same set of guns and vehicles that are meta for each BR. You don't see iconic vehicles and equipment that should be on certain maps at all now, especially Moscow..
that is why I am wanting to see campaign(map) and time period based load outs that are balanced by players entire squad strength. that way a squad of 5 troopers can still have one semi auto SVT 38 and rest some bolt action rifles with out having to choose between, is it fall under BR 2 or 3.
I just liked the authentic feel I got, when the area and time specific equipment were a thing. Maybe that is just me. Like it was the reason I start playing this game from the start. it was the most authentic WW2 game till the merger in that regard. Still I do love this game and will play for a long time.
Yep, putting a BR5 gold order/event weapon on your BR2 squad shouldn't catapult you into BR5 spam. But the forum guys screamed "but EXPLOITS" so no...
Question. Can we Go Back to The Choose Your Map instead of the BR rates determining the map you go on?
BR6 is necessary with how much power creep there is on BR5. AR's vs smg's and Tiger1 = Tiger2 ??? Pls no… they can't remain in the same BR...
And we need a proper BR+-2 matchmaker, instead of the BR3 swing without BR2-3-4 matches and br2&4 been BR+-1. (we would then also have BR4-5-6 and BR3-4-5)
This system combined with matchmaker limits to keep an equal power level between teams (~30% max BR4 players per team in a BR2-3-4 match) (narrow to BR+-1 when a BR is overcrowded) will allow for better balance while retaining equpment variety (no BR5 vs only BR5 exept when everyone and th!%$#^% is spamming BR5...).
I really like the system, but it could be better if instead of making an squad match the exact tier of the highest grade weapon, even if all the others are a lower tier, it could be more rounded, like for example, 1 tier V weapon and the remaining as tier I-II, so instead of jumping into tier V it could be a tier III army instead, so you do not discard like the golden weapons that end up in waste.
What? At 1:15 if I play rank 1 I almost always face rank 3 players who absoulty demolish me in battle with superior fire power 😭
imagine crying in enlisted 😂 dude learn how to play 😂😂😂
You might have a soldier with a BR II gun.
@@fotppd1475 i can destroy tier 5 with tier 1 weapons you guys are so wrong about the game stop thinking this game is a cod or battlefield lol 😂
@@SirJohannRoyale With what? An explosive pack?😂Anyone can do that
@@Warmaster_24 so why are you crying about tiers 😒 also there are tier 1 machines guns, rifles and anti tank rifles so dude just get better at the game lol.
so ridiculous.... you know what was more historically accurate for weapons/equipment time period usage???? CAMPAIGN modes...................
What if I just want to play the Moscow campaign though
I never understood why the Campaigns were removed...
Now you have to always change the squads if you want to use a unit that fought elsewhere.
I can't have Afrika Korps and Stalingrad units together, it doesn't make sense.
So when do we get more new tanks like the Cromwell V and Churchill Vii
They still waiting in files...
At least we are getting the pershing soon?
They should add a separated British tree
@@felipe7835 oh hell no that would be agony to grind
I'm still waiting for Italian P40 and Lewis gun for the Allies... Also give us Matilda Hedgehog premium and put basic Matilda into the free unlock tree.
Would have been nice if this video was released right after the merge. But I am sure it will help someone
😹😹😹🤦🤦🤦
I think Br3 should be reworked
need br6 then be fixed. br3 join br2-br3-br4
@@takaslatra Finally someone else that's talking about the necessity of BR6!
BR6 and a proper BR+-2 matchmaker is what we need.
@@ΑθανάσιοςΠαππάς-σ7ψ thats why i cant play br 3 my opponent always tiger 2 or panther or stg….
@@takaslatra I play BR3 and it's fine, exept when you face the best BR"5" has to offer. Even BR4 struggles with BR"5" stuff. Like, the diff between the PPsh stick vs drum mag is not that much wider that the diff betwen it and the Fedorov… And for tanks, the situation is desperate. TigerE = Tiger II(H) ??? WTF? A T-34 85 can deal with a TigerE, but it should rarely face the Tiger II(H) (and no BR3 should ever face it)… The BR3 vs BR4 is bad only against the germans (i wish my BR3 tanks had the firepower of the Pz.IV J when i'm shooting at the Panther's turret)
1:00 so if you just made a video about how the BR system currently works, which is terrible, and the entire community hates it, does that mean you are not planning to change it in the near future? Don't get me wrong, I LOVE this game, but there is only two BRs that make sense to play, BR2 and BR5... you MUST implement +1/-1 Matchmaking otherwise this game will die... if you put new players against BR3 they will lose their taste for the game incredibly quickly... Also playing BR3 makes absolutely no sense if you want to win, you have no real chance against competent BR5 players. Please STOP this madness already
wait i think i know you 😅, aren’t you the typical players who don’t rush zones and only get 15 kills in a 30 min match also don’t destroy tanks or do anything to help in the war 😂😢😢😢 now i realize yes is true matchup is broke you should get in bots only matches so you can have fun 🤣.
Entire community? Oh, you mean the crying babies who want the old battlefields style to return?
@@danielm.595 my boy 😎, yea tell those npc to go back to cod and let this free to play master piece to the real captains and commanders 🤝🫵🏽
yeah like... where was this when the BR merge happened 6 months ago lmao.
@@SirJohannRoyale ☝🤓
Whole BR system kill this game for me. I played since game launch, but after thay add br system I tried it and oh may its sooooo bad. You cant play on cool maps with cool weapons aeverything is tied to BR. You get used to play moscow with ppsha and dp-29 not anymore go play berlin/stalingrad (I hate city maps in this game). Overall all hope for this game is lost, it was fun anyway. Its just sad seeing this update didnt changed player count but made many players leave.
Br 3 has no fighting chance against br 5
i got into a BR 5 battle with BR 2
It would be cool if there was a BR3 bonus to silver and experience, that might draw more people to BR3 and make it less likely to join with BR1, BR4, and BR5 players.
Excellent. This was very informative. Thank you, Darkflow and Gaijin. 🫡
It'd be really nice if BRs were added to the squad filter, and we could select combinations of squad types, as well as squad BRs. 👍
Also, I just gotta say, Enlisted's visual quality is becoming absolutely gorgeous. ❤
Im enjoying the ranking system, i do think the first priority should now be to add more maps, the map options feel very, very limited at the moment.
I have a very bad thing which happened have a mixture between rank three and rank two, which means I can be fighting rank. Two people are rank five people
I know that voice that from other game war thunder I remember that voice
We need more in-game advices for new players to build more rally points pleaaaseeee, like in the loading screens (if there already in, I mean MORE)
No we need Rally points to be removed from Game, they are bs and ruin all matches and the gameplay.
If one Team has more serious players who run around like idiots putting that shit here and there in hard to reach and find places, other team is fcked.
Game should be about Warfare, killing and shooting, not building some sci-fi spawn points.
I hate running around having to find some dumb rally built in attic or other hard to reach place, or when dsome dickhead puts mine on spawn, real fun gameplay.
They should be restricted to be built by engineers in pre-determined places ass alternative spawns. AS in the Engineers set up a forward post like that, maybe 1-2 extra locations to be built ofr each cap as alternative spawns for match to be interesting.
Unrestricted spawns being able to be built anywhere is tupid and annoying asf
Separate BR3 from BR1-2 and have them fight vs BR4 and BR3 only, Separate BR5 from all BRs since they gear is so superior to anything else in the game.
BR1-BR2
BR3-BR4
BR5-BR5
Anything but BR3-5, really broken. IMO BR1-BR3 isn't that bad if you're BR1-2.
BR6 for AR's + tanks decompression and a proper +-2 br matchmaker would fix the game...
They kind of already did. This video lies. When your BR is 3, it only puts you in BR2, BR3, and BR4 lobbies. It doesn't even put you BR 5 until you reach at least BR4. So BR3 is already separate from BR1 and BR5 is already separate from everything except for BR 4.
oh man i remember the old ver of the game i played it after it release immediately..... got frustrated and quit but it was fun with its tiny features
BR 3 should not match BR 5 there worlds in between. is there a possibility that tier 5 only match tier 4 in the future?
I hope they go the route of War thunder where we get to play in the cold war era etc.
But not Cold War vs WW2
Yeahh.. Or imagine the point of the game where you go ground pounding with the A-10
Only if WW2 are going to be separate from Cold War gear. If it's the same as WT i'm quitting the game i'm tired of overpowered Heatfs vs my Tigers in WT.
@@krle7970 Of course that's not going to happen. they wouldn't mix 2 different eras into the same battles. It is very likely Cold War will get added as a a higher br at some point. but it will only be paired with cold war stuff. so for like a Korean war, they would probably add late WW2 Shermans and Pershings into the South, and the North would get T-34-85s as well as IS-3s and they would have to give the North Mig-15s and the South would get P80 shooting stars, and late ww2 mustangs.
Biggest error is to few maps if you play br5 or br1.
Also the k/d on a player should mean more..
say by a cod player 🤣
@@SirJohannRoyale what do you mean?
The reason for the br system was to balance the battel better but if k/d isnt a factor it will never get balanced...
@@icu6661 bruh imagine in the ww2 the commander asking their troops how many kills they got they can be send to the front line 🤣
They should put Moscow in mid and high BR. They are the best maps in the game besides ones of Normandy.
@@SirJohannRoyale øhh its a game we are talking about. Lol
And the br system now is for match making but a big gun doesnt mean you can use it well ,
Why do you sound like someone with many hrs and good but not skilled enough to only play with the big dogs
So zb26 is in tier three? Totally useless. fix the unacceptable tier ratings
needs better AI and make the game more immersive
Need more British representation
And Canadian
@@54321FUCKABLE what about all the Commonwealth and the British Empire, which contains Canada, Australia, and plenty more
@theelmogame when the Australians fought in ww2 they were battling in the same places as the Americans, so they would have been mixed in with U.S. soldiers, battles that are already represented in game. As for Canada, while they did play roles in ww2, albeit not very big ones, they mainly just fought against the French. That was technically a different war that started BEFORE ww2 and a little bit later expanded into ww2. Most of the largest, and most notable battles involved the four nations represented in game. The US, Germany, USSR, and Japan. So they actually did very well with the overall representation.
All this game needs is a better movement and it will be the favorite of a large player base
Funny to face BR III tanks while you playing with BR II and funny to face BR V tanks when you playing with BR III tank.
This definitely should be reworked into 3 separate br categories: I-II, III-IV and V
nah just I-III and IV-V BUT BR3 guns and vehicles should NEVER catapault you into BR IV-V matches.
all i see is cry cry cry everywhere 😂
Not III / IV. Panther and tiger are BR IV.
Facing BR3 tanks when you play BR2 is how uptiers should work. Facing BR"5" (BR6 really) tanks when you are playing with a BR3 tank is mostly an issue of BR compression.
We just need BR5 decompression into BR6 and a proper BR+-2 matchmaker for all BR's… It will stop BR3 from seeing AR's and King tigers while not forcing BR1 to fight itself exclusively (and we avoid the cod clone that BR"5" vs BR"5" spam will become if you isolate it).
I received a gold vehicle order from the daily login but it didnt save to my account
Thanks for your help enlisted developers i love your game
Do squads have their own BR? Regardless of weapons
No you can take a squad that unlocks with a br 4 weapon and equip them with br 1 weapons and have the squad become br 1. Basically what br the weapon is. Doesn’t work with premium squads because you are stuck with their weapon, can’t take it away
Nope only weapons and vehicles have BR. You can take flamethrower or mg squad with their buildables and still be able to play at BR1-2.
man does enlisted look like battlefield 5 to you guys or just me
We really need RALLY POINT
the game need a option to lock fov and other parameters to all players to be fair play
I play the game yesterday, play conquest, map Mansion(Moscow) as USSR.
Play as BR 2.
But I gonna ask, how the heck there is Tiger II type H in the lowest BR. I don't lie, it take most of our team to handle that behemoth.
Like how on earth that BR V tank is in BR1-3 game. If player can bring BR V tank to lower BR 1-2. That's mean they exploiting the error or bugs. And I hope and wish they got ban for it.
Second, this game should delayed tank and plane spawn for 4 minutes. So the player can have a full confrontation battle rather than getting kill in earlier game for no reason.
Like as defender in any mods, we can't even fortify the base because knowing there is a lazy bum going to camping in greyzone.
And last, separated the BR 3 from BR 1-2 and 4-5.
I hope soon the update is focus more on quality gameplay update. New features can wait for while, just make the game better for players instead.
I was always tilting why i lose with my boltaction to automatics.
wait i think i know you 😅, aren’t you the typical players who don’t rush zones and only get 15 kills in a 30 min match also don’t destroy tanks or do anything to help in the war 😂😢😢😢 now i realize yes is true matchup is broke you should get in bots only matches so you can have fun 🤣.
Bolts actions are good mid long rang that’s why
@@SirJohannRoyaleare you a child typing all those emotes
@@krle7970 i know it hurt to suck at the game is ok brother soon devs will fix that mmr for you so you can have more bots lobby so you can feel like a pro 🤝☺️👍
@@SirJohannRoyale ☝🤓
br1 always meet br3😢
BR 3 is the best the game can offer, you get all maps, you have a 70% chance of having equal teams or enemy ai teams which makes fun., Then there is a 30% chance of beeing out of place because your br is to low
br1-2 you can be better as your enemys but your team mostly consits of ai. the normal ratio is 3 human players 7 ai
br 4-5 you encounter 90% of the time only no lifers ruining the game
but 10% of the time you get realy amazing battles
it is sad tho that you cant get the moskau maps as br 5. would be great if this would still be possible in br 4-5 battles
plz fix the rendering distance! is unplayable!
Can we put BR3 in low tier (1,2) or high tier (4,5)? I don't care which, Just not both please
Nah separate BR5 as their own BR, and put BR1 vs 2 and BR 3 vs 4 only. PS Put Moscow maps in higher BRs they don't really look like early Moscow maps anyway.
@@Dregomz02 great idea! But I think they don't have the number of players needed to split into 3 groups, or do they?
@@robawtrob8399With Steam launch they should have enough people for separating BR3 from BR1-2, for BR5 probably not. If you won't protect newbies from overpowered BR3 gear then population will never grow since they will be leaving at mass after first 10 easy initial bot matches that on the 11th it'll turn into a hell on earth that they were never prepared for.
There is a huge difference betwen BR III and IV. BR IV and V should be toghther.
Nah, decompress BR5 into BR6 and add a proper Br+-2 matchmaker for all BR's, then limit the top BR of a match to ~30% to not have them stomp and you will end up with a much healthier game. Decoupling/isolating BR's from eachother hurts balance and variety, because you are killing any interaction between BR's (and will make it MUCH more difficult for newbies to climb the tech tree (getting thrown into a completely different matchmaker every time you advance a tier? Nah))
The whole premise of a BR system with uptiers/downtiers is that you don't constantly face equal opponents with the same stuff, you instead face a wider range of equipment that can be superior or inferior to yours (or both). If we wanna kill that instead of fixing it to work properly then why we got it (BR system) in the first place?
Well, sorry for everyone expecting Steam release, cuz they just made Enlisted, a F2P game to a P2P game for Steam...
Can we get an offline mode for this game?
Could you guys make premium tank squads able to change the camo pattern of the tank. The flame tanks are premiums but those are the only premiums you can change the camo on, what is that?
bruh you should be saying that on forums where devs will actually read it. They don't read comments on the RUclips channel
the number of things that the player must know and keep in mind is DEVASTATING. The icing on the cake is tier 2 =/= br 2, could this be made more confusing?
Britain country when (I want it to not be a branch of Merica FREEDOM COUNTRY) p.s- BREN gun stands for Barely rapid,empty now gun
NEED ENEMY COORDINATES
So the meta right now is to stick to tier, lol ?!?
Everyone i know plays tier 2 or tier 5, nothing else lol.
Just release your new br6 at steam launch. Make 2 match making brackets. A new player going against flamethrowers with bolt actions on defense is so depressing.
BR3 need a change ! a BR3 tank cannot kill a BR5 tank, never
bBR1&2 should never play with Br3. And BR3 never with BR5
then who should br iii fight against
@@rouxgreasus 4&3
Maybe they will do this after the steam launch, at the moment the player count is to low.
So that would either mean more bots to fill the team, or have longer waiting times.
(They said his last november or december, the article is still on their website)
@@rouxgreasus just 3 with higher que times, or 3&4
That's not the issue. The swingy nature of the half ass implementation of BR3's BR system that lacks BR2-3-4 matches AND the powercreep of BR5 (BR6 plz.) is the problem here. We don't even have a proper BR matchmaker and most people think that breaking it even further will fix it… We need BR5 decompression into BR6 and a proper BR+-2 matchmaker for all BR's to fix this…
One match should only have two BRs instead of three...
We need sdkfz 222 and sdkfz 234/3
Battle Rating sucks.
Year of service with according maps and that's it.
Their way of Rating sucks, doesn't consider what year nor what type of weapon vehicle for what role, and this with maps going anywhere is bs.
historical Immersion is key and all for a WW2 Squad FPS
And yet it doesnt work as BR5 i can go BR3-5 and strill cannot play tunisia or pacific fix ur game
REWORK IT SO THERE'S 3 QUES: BR 1&2, 3&4 AND 5.
I'm just stuck in BRII because anything higher becomes ridiculous. So in effect I've lost half the game and maps. Get rid of the fool who thought this crap up.
My new nazi non-premium army this week will be: Assault BR III, Engee BR III, Half-Track with 75 which is BR III and Tiger BR V 😂
Historical accuracy was ditched with the merge...
Playing BR 3 with any faction other than USA is very stupid idea too, we need a rework of matchmaking ASAP!
Historical accuracy isn't the point of the game anymore. It's slowly becoming war thunder.
wait i think i know you 😅, aren’t you the typical players who don’t rush zones and only get 15 kills in a 30 min match also don’t destroy tanks or do anything to help in the war 😂😢😢😢 now i realize yes is true matchup is broke you should get in bots only matches so you can have fun 🤣.
@@SirJohannRoyale every merge hater is a bot farmer lmao
@@rouxgreasusAnd we don't care.
@@rouxgreasus my boy 😎😎😎 i was thinking i was the only one vs all those bots 🤣
Why care about history? No one will be harmed when BR 5 players play a game in Moscow
Need br2 paratroopers Japan. Buff low BR Japan we need them fierce like in real life to counter better equipped marines
I'll "help newcomers" by leaving an honest review on Steam so they know what they're getting into.
yes tell them how trash you are at the game so they know everything 🤣
@@SirJohannRoyale The current BR system is a joke and everyone knows it.
@@SirJohannRoyale☝🤓
👍
And BR3 should only fight BR3 in my book.
yes 🤓 or you can play with bots all day baby in solo custom lobbys
@SirJohannRoyale It's Enlisted. Bots are literally in every match.
The current battle rating is cancer. BR-3 seal clubbers will either be sodomizing BR-1 players or being sodomized by BR-5. BR 1-5 should all be separate queues, we have enough players to support 5 separate battle rating queues across all campaigns and servers.
remove stalingrad from br 5
Agree on that.
Only if they add more maps, otherwise Rank 5 will barely have any map rotation.
In fact, this game needs more maps for all br's.
(Other than that i do like the new system)
@@TheTryingDutchman there is already a lot of maps. The problem is the rotation that put players at the same couple maps. For example, I had a played a lot americans tier V in these days and most of the maps were bulge. Like 70/80% of the times.
🎉🎉❤❤
Quand pourra t on choisir sa campagne !!!
Ou mieux : l'ancien sisteme !
Parce que la ont frole la mediocrité, (perso j avais 2000h de jeu et j ai arreter a cause de cette mise a jour majeur comme pas mal de monde)
This System is the dumbest shit ever and it ruined the game
It really is trash. It doesn't help matchmake at all. In the 6 campaign version it was so much fun. I didn't give a damn other people had progress stuff because it only took a little playing to get some things. And you could always pickup someones 100 round tommy gun and destroy their squad. Complete skill issue. The game is totally ruined now, I tried to get friends to play and it was too confusing. Had we been able to just queue for a specific campaign it would not be a problem..and the tech tree is overcomplicated compared to the staged one which was better.
The battle rating system is ass, it should be rank based match making, 1-20 21-30 31-40 , this would prevent veteran players from exploiting mechanics and seal clubbing.
Hi
historical accurate no one cares br 3 need balance i have t-34 first generation and the enemy tiger 2 H or panther. this game need br 6 for balance
Such a broken system. It means you essentially have to stay at BR2 until you're BR 5 ready. I've completed unlocked everything up to BR4, even got some premium BR4 items from the battle pass, yet I still play BR2. When steam releases this needs to be changed. Terrible design
im done with this Game. BR Rating is the biggest Bullshit ever!
BE it's not good
very first🤫
And then y end up in a unbalanced shit filled with screaming kids, no engineers and why should i mark a tank. The Christmastree of achieving weapons is a laughter.
The worst game no balance Germans and soviet only lasers weapons missing, Thompson is one weapon from British and Americans the give to soviet, the soviet never use one capitalism weapon even the realistic no exist, the machine gun weapons from
Maybe make functioning BR system before making a video about. The current ONE is GARBAGE
oh really 😂, yes devs pls listen to this cod player and remove BR sistem.
BR my ass matchmaking is the problem it matches you with less players, think your playing with real person? Guess again screw this game!
as a real pro player of this game all i can say is that everything is balance and good the problems here are the players brains 🤣 🤣 i don’t think devs can balance that 🤣 🤣.
Too bad you still get no bitches.
Bro nobody wants to play br 5 in br3. That's just ass. Unless you have a br 5 squad then you shouldn't see higher than 3 why tf do you keep adding up tiers.
Tier 1 faces tier 1
tier two faces tier one and two
Tier 3 faces two and three
Tier 4 faces tier 4 and five faces five. This is the balance players want
get good lol
@@SirJohannRoyale I have 1300 hours in enlisted good sir. I've been playing this game for 3 years. I average over 100 kills a game. I've seen when the game was good and when it was bad. Right now it's dog shit.
1300 hours XD XD XD jajajajajajajajaaj ok
@@Onthew4y
That's just stale spam of everyone having the same things… A wider, proper BR+-2 with BR decompression is ehat we need.
AS to what will face what in a proper BR system? Here:
BR1-2
BR1-2-3
BR2-3-4
BR3-4-5
BR4-5-6
BR5-6
(and BRx-y when a BR is overcrowded)
Garbage trash pay to win game. Monetize a game with skins not paying for weapons.
Shit game.