May Allah the almighty bless, guide and protect Sh.Abdurahama Hassan and grant him long life with good health full of blessings, and increase him in taqwa and knowledge and give children who will be more Allah _fearing and more knowledgeable than him and safeguard him from all his enemies and their evil plots.
lol according to you then the companions should have never compiled the Quran, since the prophet never did it. And abu bakr was wrong to let umar convince him to do it. This is your fitting reply 😂😂😂
Both of your statements are bereft of knowledge and understanding of Islam. Firstly You posed the doubt of Abū bakr رضي الله عنه compiling the Qurʾān ignoring the prophet صلى الله عله وسلم told us to follow the sunnah of the khalafā Ar-Rashidun. عن العرباض بن سارية رضي الله عنه قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : فَعَلَيْكُمْ بِسُنَّتِي وَسُنَّةِ الْخُلَفَاءِ الْمَهْدِيِّينَ الرَّاشِدِينَ تَمَسَّكُوا بِهَا وَعَضُّوا عَلَيْهَا بِالنَّوَاجِذِ وَإِيَّاكُمْ وَمُحْدَثَاتِ الأُمُورِ فَإِنَّ كُلَّ مُحْدَثَةٍ بِدْعَةٌ وَكُلَّ بِدْعَةٍ ضَلاَلَةٌ " . “You must then follow my sunnah and that of the rightly-guided caliphs. Hold to it and stick fast to it. Avoid newly invented matter, for every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is an error.” Sunan Abi Dāwūd 4607 Also the Qurʾān was already compiled before Abū bakr رضي الله عنه in the hearts of the Ṣaḥāba and some had them written in parchments by the command of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم . All Abū bakr رضي الله عنه did was compile that into a single book for there was a need for it that didn’t exist at the time of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم . Also all the Ṣaḥāba were pleased with it and accepted it and didn’t forbid this action at the end. This can’t be compared to the mawlid where you are doing something no one for amongst the Ṣaḥāba their successor and their successor after them ever did rather it was innovation taken from the Christians by the rafidah Shia. Also the statement the other commenter said about needing proof for the prohibition is incorrect in principle. ‘Ibādah( acts of worship) is tawfiqi( evidence based ie Qurʾān and sunnah). You must bring proof something is allowed to be acted not the other way around. For example if a person come and said I will pray 10 rakhat for Asr salah you would ask him where did he get it from. You wouldn’t view it to be reasonable that he just says “I can do it becomes prayer is good show me where in the Qurʾān it says I can’t do that”. ACTS OF WORSHIP REQUIRE EVIDENCES!!! Also it was prohibited in the Qurʾān and sunnah as I shall list below. Allāh عز وجل says in the Qurʾān: وَمَآ ءَاتَىٰكُمُ ٱلرَّسُولُ فَخُذُوهُ وَمَا نَهَىٰكُمْ عَنْهُ فَٱنتَهُوا۟ ۚ وَٱتَّقُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ ۖ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ شَدِيدُ ٱلْعِقَابِ And whatsoever the Messenger (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) gives you, take it, and whatsoever he forbids you, abstain (from it). And fear Allah, verily, Allah is Severe in punishment. Did the prophet tell use to celebrate his mawlid? NO! Rather he commanded us to not do any innovations as aforementioned before. “ وَإِيَّاكُمْ وَمُحْدَثَاتِ الأُمُورِ فَإِنَّ كُلَّ مُحْدَثَةٍ بِدْعَةٌ وَكُلَّ بِدْعَةٍ ضَلاَلَةٌ” “And avoid newly invented matter, for every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is an error.” Sunan Abi Dāwūd 4607 Also عن عائشة رضي الله عنها قالت قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : مَنْ أَحْدَثَ فِي أَمْرِنَا هَذَا مَا لَيْسَ مِنْهُ فَهُوَ رَدٌّ ʿĀʾisha رضي الله عنها said that the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم said: “He who innovates something in this matter of ours (i.e., Islam) that is not of it will have it rejected (by Allah).” Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 2697 This Ḥadīth shows you won’t be rewarded for your innovation so why continue to do it. If you truly love the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم then follow his sunnah. And remember the statement of ibn ʿUmar رضي الله عنه “كل بدعة ضلالة، وإن رآها الناسُ حسنَ” Every innovation is misguidance even if the people see it as good. Its chain is Ṣaḥīḥ . May Allāh guide us to the straight path and make us from his righteous obedient slaves. امين
@@حمزة_97 You said: Also the Qurʾān was already compiled before Abū bakr رضي الله عنه in the hearts of the Ṣaḥāba and some had them written in parchments by the command of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم . All Abū bakr رضي الله عنه did was compile that into a single book for there was a need for it that didn’t exist at the time of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم . Also all the Ṣaḥāba were pleased with it and accepted it and didn’t forbid this action at the end. Response: Did Abu Bakr not know this? Why would he respond negatively to something that was already being done? Yes all the Sahabah were pleased, because as Umar said to Abu Bakr, it was a good thing. In the response of Umar, he didn't use your daleel that Abu Bakr was given a green light to do whatever he wants just because he is the caliph. Rather, they referred the matter back to the Qur'an and Sunnah, and determined that compiling the Qur'an in one book was a good thing, since it did not contradict anything from the Qur'an or Sunnah. On the other hand, when Umar tried to set a limit to the dowry, a woman brought his attention that it was not his right to do so, and he agreed, as she was upon the Qur'an and Sunnah. He did not respond to her that he was among the righteous caliphs and it was necessary to follow him in the matter. Again, they made decisions based on compliance with Qur'an and Sunnah. You said: This can’t be compared to the mawlid where you are doing something no one for amongst the Ṣaḥāba their successor and their successor after them ever did rather it was innovation taken from the Christians by the rafidah Shia. Response: The mawlid was praised by Dhahabi, Ibn Taymiyyah, and ibn Katheer among the poeple who you hold in high esteem. They also mention that the King of Irbil al Mudhaffar did this and praised him highly. Tell me if you find in their books any statements that deem him as a sinful innovator for that. You said: Also the statement the other commenter said about needing proof for the prohibition is incorrect in principle. ‘Ibādah( acts of worship) is tawfiqi( evidence based ie Qurʾān and sunnah). You must bring proof something is allowed to be acted not the other way around. For example if a person come and said I will pray 10 rakhat for Asr salah you would ask him where did he get it from. You wouldn’t view it to be reasonable that he just says “I can do it becomes prayer is good show me where in the Qurʾān it says I can’t do that”. ACTS OF WORSHIP REQUIRE EVIDENCES!!! Response: There is enough evidence that reciting Qur'an, praising the Prophet peace be upon him, distributing food are all praiseworthy actions in the religion. You said: Also it was prohibited in the Qurʾān and sunnah as I shall list below. Allāh عز وجل says in the Qurʾān: وَمَآ ءَاتَىٰكُمُ ٱلرَّسُولُ فَخُذُوهُ وَمَا نَهَىٰكُمْ عَنْهُ فَٱنتَهُوا۟ ۚ وَٱتَّقُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ ۖ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ شَدِيدُ ٱلْعِقَابِ And whatsoever the Messenger (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) gives you, take it, and whatsoever he forbids you, abstain (from it). And fear Allah, verily, Allah is Severe in punishment. The Prophet did n Did the prophet tell use to celebrate his mawlid? NO! Rather he commanded us to not do any innovations as aforementioned before. Response: The Prophet did not command us to commemorate nor forbade us. He enjoined us to be charitable, read Qur'an, and make dhikr. So yeah we are following him in that. You on the other hand are making up rules, stating forbidden that something the Prophet did not deem forbidden. You said “ وَإِيَّاكُمْ وَمُحْدَثَاتِ الأُمُورِ فَإِنَّ كُلَّ مُحْدَثَةٍ بِدْعَةٌ وَكُلَّ بِدْعَةٍ ضَلاَلَةٌ” “And avoid newly invented matter, for every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is an error.” Sunan Abi Dāwūd 4607 Response: I'll refer you to Imam Al-Shafi^iys distinction of innovation in two categories You need to view this hadith in contexts of other hadiths where innovation is mentioned, as per the hadith you posted below. But reflect on the hadith of Bayhaqi where the Prophet says: Kul ^ayn Zaniyah, which literally means that every single eye is an adulterer (does the haraam look) Yet surely you know that the Prophets, babies, blind people, insane people don't commit haraam with their eyes, right? And thus you understand that "Kul" in this case does not mean all, but most. Based on the hadith you mention now, and other proofs, we also understand that not all, but rather most innovations are misguidance. You said Also عن عائشة رضي الله عنها قالت قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : مَنْ أَحْدَثَ فِي أَمْرِنَا هَذَا مَا لَيْسَ مِنْهُ فَهُوَ رَدٌّ ʿĀʾisha رضي الله عنها said that the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم said: “He who innovates something in this matter of ours (i.e., Islam) that is not of it will have it rejected (by Allah).” Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 2697 Response: Yup, and from what is understood from the hadith is that what is not of this matter of ours is rejected, and so what is from this matter of ours is accepted. Certainly glorifying the Messenger, charity, Qur'an recitation, dhikr are all from what is part of this matter of ours, and is thus accepted. if this distinction is not clear, then why would the prophet add "that is not of it"? He would have simply mentioned whoever innovates in this matter of ours will have it rejected, without mentioning the condition of "that is not of it" You said: This Ḥadīth shows you won’t be rewarded for your innovation so why continue to do it. Response: Not according to your Ibn Taymiyyah, nor according to the vast majority of the scholars You said: If you truly love the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم then follow his sunnah. Response: Thank you, I am. You said: And remember the statement of ibn ʿUmar رضي الله عنه “كل بدعة ضلالة، وإن رآها الناسُ حسنَ” Every innovation is misguidance even if the people see it as good. Its chain is Ṣaḥīḥ . Response: do you know in what context he had said it? He was being asked about the second adhan that the caliph Uthman innovated on the day of Friday, and mentioned his view on it. He viewed that this innovation was wrong. The other companions didn't. this also goes against your statement that what the righteous caliphs do should be followed. Was Ibn Umar contradicting the explicit statement of the Messenger according to you? of course not. He gave his opinion, yet the innovation of Uthman is the one that lasted and persists until today :) You said: May Allāh guide us to the straight path and make us from his righteous obedient slaves. امين Response: Aameen. thank you so much for taking the time to read and reflect on my response
What a stupid video Sectarian wahhabism is so old news Let’s move on and unite on matters wherein there is consensus from the scholars that it’s haram/disliked. On matters of legitimate difference of opinion, move on!
It’s Stupid because it doesn’t go with your desire right? Wallahi I fear for this people who when evidence brought to them they wanna dodge a clear cut evidence. It’s Bid’ah point blank period!!! Allah Says in surah An’am “ ونقلب أفئدتهم وأبصارهم كما لم يؤمنوا به أول مرة ونذرهم في طغيانهم يعمهون Keep denying! Every time you deny the sunnah or Do a bid’ah action keep this verse of the Quran in your mind tho.
The Prophet Muhammad salallahu alayhi wasalam never celebrated his birthday. Nor did the first 3 generations. Imagine he was alive today, all these Muslims celebrating his birthday and he is not celebrating it. May Allah Azzawajal guide us and keep us upon the Haqq. Ameen.
Wahabi and pseudo salafis obsessed and fixated on matters of mubaha. Ppl who celebrate maulid do out of love for the prophet saw. Move on. It is something good. It is the intention amd Allah who will determine based on what the person intended. Not you and your narrov takfiri views. Tjere are much serios problems facing the ummah then is fixating on such trivial differences
@@focus_on_deen4050no need in arguing with these people whatever proof you bring them they will never accept to follow the sunnah over cultural tradition
I don’t believe it’s a matter of ikhtilaf but let’s say for arguments sake it’s a doubtful matter. What the righteous salaf would do (not salafi) is that whenever something is doubtful in matters of religion they would apply something called wara3 it translates into having high level of taqwa and leaving doubtful matters and it is praiseworthy if you do this. Hasan ibn Ali reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Leave what makes you doubt for what does not make you doubt. Verily, truth brings peace of mind and falsehood sows doubt.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2518 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
May Allah the almighty bless, guide and protect Sh.Abdurahama Hassan and grant him long life with good health full of blessings, and increase him in taqwa and knowledge and give children who will be more Allah _fearing and more knowledgeable than him and safeguard him from all his enemies and their evil plots.
AMEEN ,🤲🤲🤲🤲
Ameen
Amin
جزاكم الله خيرا وبارك الله فيكم
وأنت فجزاك الله خيراً
A'udhubillah.
Alhamudulillah
i checked the part is not there in bukhari where he says you have a good example in the prophet but it is there in musnad ahmad
جزاك الله خيراً
@@authenticislamreminders surah Ahzab ayah 21
Don’t worry Satan couldn’t prostrate to Adam AS although he prayed millions of Salah
lol according to you then the companions should have never compiled the Quran, since the prophet never did it. And abu bakr was wrong to let umar convince him to do it. This is your fitting reply 😂😂😂
Did the sahabah celebrate this Bidah
Trust me. Their logic is bewildering. Find in the qura’an where it categorically states milaad is impermissible. I’m still waiting.
Both of your statements are bereft of knowledge and understanding of Islam. Firstly You posed the doubt of Abū bakr رضي الله عنه compiling the Qurʾān ignoring the prophet صلى الله عله وسلم told us to follow the sunnah of the khalafā Ar-Rashidun.
عن العرباض بن سارية رضي الله عنه قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : فَعَلَيْكُمْ بِسُنَّتِي وَسُنَّةِ الْخُلَفَاءِ الْمَهْدِيِّينَ الرَّاشِدِينَ تَمَسَّكُوا بِهَا وَعَضُّوا عَلَيْهَا بِالنَّوَاجِذِ وَإِيَّاكُمْ وَمُحْدَثَاتِ الأُمُورِ فَإِنَّ كُلَّ مُحْدَثَةٍ بِدْعَةٌ وَكُلَّ بِدْعَةٍ ضَلاَلَةٌ " .
“You must then follow my sunnah and that of the rightly-guided caliphs. Hold to it and stick fast to it. Avoid newly invented matter, for every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is an error.”
Sunan Abi Dāwūd 4607
Also the Qurʾān was already compiled before Abū bakr رضي الله عنه in the hearts of the Ṣaḥāba and some had them written in parchments by the command of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم . All Abū bakr رضي الله عنه did was compile that into a single book for there was a need for it that didn’t exist at the time of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم . Also all the Ṣaḥāba were pleased with it and accepted it and didn’t forbid this action at the end.
This can’t be compared to the mawlid where you are doing something no one for amongst the Ṣaḥāba their successor and their successor after them ever did rather it was innovation taken from the Christians by the rafidah Shia.
Also the statement the other commenter said about needing proof for the prohibition is incorrect in principle. ‘Ibādah( acts of worship) is tawfiqi( evidence based ie Qurʾān and sunnah). You must bring proof something is allowed to be acted not the other way around. For example if a person come and said I will pray 10 rakhat for Asr salah you would ask him where did he get it from. You wouldn’t view it to be reasonable that he just says “I can do it becomes prayer is good show me where in the Qurʾān it says I can’t do that”. ACTS OF WORSHIP REQUIRE EVIDENCES!!!
Also it was prohibited in the Qurʾān and sunnah as I shall list below.
Allāh عز وجل says in the Qurʾān:
وَمَآ ءَاتَىٰكُمُ ٱلرَّسُولُ فَخُذُوهُ وَمَا نَهَىٰكُمْ عَنْهُ فَٱنتَهُوا۟ ۚ وَٱتَّقُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ ۖ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ شَدِيدُ ٱلْعِقَابِ
And whatsoever the Messenger (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) gives you, take it, and whatsoever he forbids you, abstain (from it). And fear Allah, verily, Allah is Severe in punishment.
Did the prophet tell use to celebrate his mawlid? NO! Rather he commanded us to not do any innovations as aforementioned before.
“ وَإِيَّاكُمْ وَمُحْدَثَاتِ الأُمُورِ فَإِنَّ كُلَّ مُحْدَثَةٍ بِدْعَةٌ وَكُلَّ بِدْعَةٍ ضَلاَلَةٌ”
“And avoid newly invented matter, for every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is an error.”
Sunan Abi Dāwūd 4607
Also
عن عائشة رضي الله عنها قالت قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : مَنْ أَحْدَثَ فِي أَمْرِنَا هَذَا مَا لَيْسَ مِنْهُ فَهُوَ رَدٌّ
ʿĀʾisha رضي الله عنها said that the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم said: “He who innovates something in this matter of ours (i.e., Islam) that is not of it will have it rejected (by Allah).”
Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 2697
This Ḥadīth shows you won’t be rewarded for your innovation so why continue to do it. If you truly love the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم then follow his sunnah. And remember the statement of ibn ʿUmar رضي الله عنه
“كل بدعة ضلالة، وإن رآها الناسُ حسنَ”
Every innovation is misguidance even if the people see it as good.
Its chain is Ṣaḥīḥ .
May Allāh guide us to the straight path and make us from his righteous obedient slaves. امين
@@حمزة_97
You said:
Also the Qurʾān was already compiled before Abū bakr رضي الله عنه in the hearts of the Ṣaḥāba and some had them written in parchments by the command of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم . All Abū bakr رضي الله عنه did was compile that into a single book for there was a need for it that didn’t exist at the time of the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم . Also all the Ṣaḥāba were pleased with it and accepted it and didn’t forbid this action at the end.
Response:
Did Abu Bakr not know this? Why would he respond negatively to something that was already being done? Yes all the Sahabah were pleased, because as Umar said to Abu Bakr, it was a good thing. In the response of Umar, he didn't use your daleel that Abu Bakr was given a green light to do whatever he wants just because he is the caliph. Rather, they referred the matter back to the Qur'an and Sunnah, and determined that compiling the Qur'an in one book was a good thing, since it did not contradict anything from the Qur'an or Sunnah. On the other hand, when Umar tried to set a limit to the dowry, a woman brought his attention that it was not his right to do so, and he agreed, as she was upon the Qur'an and Sunnah. He did not respond to her that he was among the righteous caliphs and it was necessary to follow him in the matter. Again, they made decisions based on compliance with Qur'an and Sunnah.
You said:
This can’t be compared to the mawlid where you are doing something no one for amongst the Ṣaḥāba their successor and their successor after them ever did rather it was innovation taken from the Christians by the rafidah Shia.
Response:
The mawlid was praised by Dhahabi, Ibn Taymiyyah, and ibn Katheer among the poeple who you hold in high esteem. They also mention that the King of Irbil al Mudhaffar did this and praised him highly. Tell me if you find in their books any statements that deem him as a sinful innovator for that.
You said:
Also the statement the other commenter said about needing proof for the prohibition is incorrect in principle. ‘Ibādah( acts of worship) is tawfiqi( evidence based ie Qurʾān and sunnah). You must bring proof something is allowed to be acted not the other way around. For example if a person come and said I will pray 10 rakhat for Asr salah you would ask him where did he get it from. You wouldn’t view it to be reasonable that he just says “I can do it becomes prayer is good show me where in the Qurʾān it says I can’t do that”. ACTS OF WORSHIP REQUIRE EVIDENCES!!!
Response:
There is enough evidence that reciting Qur'an, praising the Prophet peace be upon him, distributing food are all praiseworthy actions in the religion.
You said:
Also it was prohibited in the Qurʾān and sunnah as I shall list below.
Allāh عز وجل says in the Qurʾān:
وَمَآ ءَاتَىٰكُمُ ٱلرَّسُولُ فَخُذُوهُ وَمَا نَهَىٰكُمْ عَنْهُ فَٱنتَهُوا۟ ۚ وَٱتَّقُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ ۖ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ شَدِيدُ ٱلْعِقَابِ
And whatsoever the Messenger (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) gives you, take it, and whatsoever he forbids you, abstain (from it). And fear Allah, verily, Allah is Severe in punishment.
The Prophet did n
Did the prophet tell use to celebrate his mawlid? NO! Rather he commanded us to not do any innovations as aforementioned before.
Response:
The Prophet did not command us to commemorate nor forbade us. He enjoined us to be charitable, read Qur'an, and make dhikr. So yeah we are following him in that. You on the other hand are making up rules, stating forbidden that something the Prophet did not deem forbidden.
You said
“ وَإِيَّاكُمْ وَمُحْدَثَاتِ الأُمُورِ فَإِنَّ كُلَّ مُحْدَثَةٍ بِدْعَةٌ وَكُلَّ بِدْعَةٍ ضَلاَلَةٌ”
“And avoid newly invented matter, for every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is an error.”
Sunan Abi Dāwūd 4607
Response:
I'll refer you to Imam Al-Shafi^iys distinction of innovation in two categories
You need to view this hadith in contexts of other hadiths where innovation is mentioned, as per the hadith you posted below. But reflect on the hadith of Bayhaqi where the Prophet says: Kul ^ayn Zaniyah, which literally means that every single eye is an adulterer (does the haraam look) Yet surely you know that the Prophets, babies, blind people, insane people don't commit haraam with their eyes, right? And thus you understand that "Kul" in this case does not mean all, but most. Based on the hadith you mention now, and other proofs, we also understand that not all, but rather most innovations are misguidance.
You said
Also
عن عائشة رضي الله عنها قالت قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : مَنْ أَحْدَثَ فِي أَمْرِنَا هَذَا مَا لَيْسَ مِنْهُ فَهُوَ رَدٌّ
ʿĀʾisha رضي الله عنها said that the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم said: “He who innovates something in this matter of ours (i.e., Islam) that is not of it will have it rejected (by Allah).”
Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 2697
Response:
Yup, and from what is understood from the hadith is that what is not of this matter of ours is rejected, and so what is from this matter of ours is accepted. Certainly glorifying the Messenger, charity, Qur'an recitation, dhikr are all from what is part of this matter of ours, and is thus accepted. if this distinction is not clear, then why would the prophet add "that is not of it"? He would have simply mentioned whoever innovates in this matter of ours will have it rejected, without mentioning the condition of "that is not of it"
You said:
This Ḥadīth shows you won’t be rewarded for your innovation so why continue to do it.
Response:
Not according to your Ibn Taymiyyah, nor according to the vast majority of the scholars
You said:
If you truly love the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم
then follow his sunnah.
Response:
Thank you, I am.
You said:
And remember the statement of ibn ʿUmar رضي الله عنه
“كل بدعة ضلالة، وإن رآها الناسُ حسنَ”
Every innovation is misguidance even if the people see it as good.
Its chain is Ṣaḥīḥ .
Response:
do you know in what context he had said it? He was being asked about the second adhan that the caliph Uthman innovated on the day of Friday, and mentioned his view on it. He viewed that this innovation was wrong. The other companions didn't. this also goes against your statement that what the righteous caliphs do should be followed. Was Ibn Umar contradicting the explicit statement of the Messenger according to you? of course not. He gave his opinion, yet the innovation of Uthman is the one that lasted and persists until today :)
You said:
May Allāh guide us to the straight path and make us from his righteous obedient slaves. امين
Response:
Aameen. thank you so much for taking the time to read and reflect on my response
What a stupid video
Sectarian wahhabism is so old news
Let’s move on and unite on matters wherein there is consensus from the scholars that it’s haram/disliked. On matters of legitimate difference of opinion, move on!
It’s Stupid because it doesn’t go with your desire right? Wallahi I fear for this people who when evidence brought to them they wanna dodge a clear cut evidence. It’s Bid’ah point blank period!!!
Allah Says in surah An’am “ ونقلب أفئدتهم وأبصارهم كما لم يؤمنوا به أول مرة ونذرهم في طغيانهم يعمهون
Keep denying! Every time you deny the sunnah or Do a bid’ah action keep this verse of the Quran in your mind tho.
The Prophet Muhammad salallahu alayhi wasalam never celebrated his birthday. Nor did the first 3 generations. Imagine he was alive today, all these Muslims celebrating his birthday and he is not celebrating it.
May Allah Azzawajal guide us and keep us upon the Haqq. Ameen.
Anyone that quotes quran and sunnah is suddenly a a wahhabi? Try explain what a wahaabi means 😂
Wahabi and pseudo salafis obsessed and fixated on matters of mubaha. Ppl who celebrate maulid do out of love for the prophet saw. Move on. It is something good. It is the intention amd Allah who will determine based on what the person intended. Not you and your narrov takfiri views. Tjere are much serios problems facing the ummah then is fixating on such trivial differences
look into the origins of the birthday, and yet alone the origins of the mawlid. if you still perist, i feel bad. allah yahdeena
@@focus_on_deen4050no need in arguing with these people whatever proof you bring them they will never accept to follow the sunnah over cultural tradition
Celebrating birthdays is a pagan tradition is not ? Allah knows best
I don’t believe it’s a matter of ikhtilaf but let’s say for arguments sake it’s a doubtful matter. What the righteous salaf would do (not salafi) is that whenever something is doubtful in matters of religion they would apply something called wara3 it translates into having high level of taqwa and leaving doubtful matters and it is praiseworthy if you do this.
Hasan ibn Ali reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Leave what makes you doubt for what does not make you doubt. Verily, truth brings peace of mind and falsehood sows doubt.”
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2518
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
Your probablyy a sufi or shia crying and always shotuing "wahhabi" "SALAFI"
And he became Satan