Yes we will celebrate the Mawlid of our Holy Prophet صلی الله عليه وآله وسلم now and always ان شاء الله We are happy with our Holy Prophet صلی الله عليه وآله وسلم and we are happy with his coming to this world. And we are thankful to Allah ta’ala for making us from his ummah. الحمدُلِلّٰه
@zohaibmaqbool masha Allah, this generation must be better than first three generations because prophet peace be upon him, he said the best of generation is my generation, then next, then next, they never celebrated prophet MUHAMMAD peace be, birthday or the 4 imams, if they have please let me know. Jazk Allah khair
The birth of our Beloved Nabee-e-Kareem s.a.w. Should be celebrated every day of our lives. Almighty ALLAAH send Nabee-e-Kareem s.a.w. as a mercy to mankind. By following the lifestyle of the greatest man that set foot on this earth.
WE LOVERS OF OUR BELOVED NABI SALLALLAHU ALAIHIWA SALLAM will and always celebrate MAULOOD until our final breath, and it will continue with our progeny... Ameen 🌹
@@AbuBakr-Siddiq You calling every scholar out there as a Mubatha'di is okay, but me calling the Najdi Shaithaan as Najdi Shaithaan is mass thakfeer?😀😀😀
First video of his Ive watched. He does not quote the hadith he mentions and tries to discredit scholars who disagree with him. And fails at proving his arguments. All he and others have to do is tell us where RasulAllah SAW gave us permission to innovate a third eid (eid milad ul nabi as it is called in Pakistan) or celebrate his birth in anyway. Did he SAW or his Sahaba do this, did the Salaf of the Ummah do this? That's all.
You wish to celebrate the mawlid, then do it like the prophet (saw) has taught us, fast on the monday of every week, throughout the year. Worship of allah and doing the mawlid the sunnah way.
@@obaidafzal818 which 3 celebrated Thanksgiving, baby showers, fathers day, mothers day..but go to any salafi community, and it's definitely going down like that...
The fact that you think the mawlid is the prophets birthday is your misconception, not those who rejoice at his birth and coming into this world as our prophet. It is not 1 day a year they rejoice, but daily, throughout their lives.
How can najdiyyah do all these thing that the Sahaba didn't do?? MADDAD AMREEKA. Siding with British to fight khilafa? Zionism? Destroying Islamic heritage? Takfir of majority of Muslims?
@n.a.1397 you didn't answer his question. Now let me ask you. Did the greatest companion Abu Bakr As Siddiq رضي الله عنهم celebrate mawlid the way the sufis do today? If so bring your reference
@@AbuBakr-Siddiq if the sahaba had done so, it would've been a sunnah. Where do we say it's sunnah? We say it's mustahab. For being mustahab the Hadith of ameere muawiya radiyallahu taala anhu is enough, that the sahaba gathered and thanked allah subhanahu wa taala for sending the best of creations sallallahu alaihi wasallam among them. Overall, you have no proof of it being impermissible. Ya may put up the Hadith of bidah al dwalalah but you will not explain what is bidah al dwalalah acc to sunnah.
Islam does not work like that. The ijma of the ummah is the burden of proof is upon the claimant. You people beleive mawlid is a sunnah so the burden of proof is upon you to prove either Muhammad ﷺ or the Khulifa ar rashideen did this@CEO786
Imaam Maalik rahimahullah said: "He who innovates an innovation in Islaam regarding it as something good, has claimed that Muhammad ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ has betrayed his trust to deliver the message as Allaah says: {This day have I perfected for you your religion}. [Surah al-Maaidah (5): 3] And whatsoever was not part of the religion then, is not part of the religion today."
Oh do you know that when anyone visited imam Malik his servant would ask if he has visited for fiqh or for listening hadith for prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam. If he said about fiqh then imam Malik would normally tell him that. If he said otherwise, then imam malik would go in, perform ghusl, wear a good jhubba and imamah, apply itr, sit on a takht, only after which he would proceed further, as reported by imam quazi ayadh in his book 'al shifa' So please don't try to misquote the imams cuz that would imply that they didn't follow their own sayings
@MotorWorld-v8y and that ayah that you mentioned you know that wasn't the last ayah revealed ? Maybe because you watches the movie "the message" you think that's the case but there was ayahs revealed to our prophet after that ayah, so if that's your belief than what do you say about the ayahs revealed after that ayah??? May Allah guide you
@@UsthazKanzulAhmedSahih al-Bukhari 46 read this hadith akhi it's about a man from najd who met the prophet ﷺ watch your tongue brother may allah guide us to the truth
Alas such a good practice was missed by Abu Bakr as siddiq, umar Bin khattab, uthman Bin affan, Ali Bin abu Talib........and so on some 1.2 lakh Sahaba May Allah be pleased with them all
So we don't know the exact date of birth of the Prophet ﷺ but know exactly when he passed away. Those celebrating, what are you exactly celebrating? His passing? Think again. May Allah Protect and Guide us all. Ameen.
The Prophet said the horn of the devil will come from najd, now tell me who else the Prophet was talking about? subhan^Allah. They say Allah resides on top of his throne, they attribute physical parts to Allah, haven't they heard the verse "He doesn't resemble any of the creation, he is the all hearing, all seeing" the Mawlid is far from their biggest problem, but the very thing that diffretuates between a beliver and a non-believer the belief that Allah does not resemble the creation and that you cannot attribute a place, and time to him, as he is the creator of time and place. Allah created everything from water. The first creation is water. The Prophet, sallallahu ^alayhi wa sallam, said: [Innallaha ta^ala khalaqa kulla shay’im minal-ma’.] Which means: “Allah created everything from water.” (Related by Ibn Hibban.) So if Allah created water first than from the water created the arsh, how can they say he resides ontop of the throne. This indicates that Allah was in a space then moved on top of the throne. Alhamdulillah for ahlul-sunnah-wal-jammah. If they had a chance they would move the Prophets grave so no one would visit him as Saudi once wanted to to. (This can be found online and many articles were written on this) But there sheikh ibn taymiahh they left his grave, and destroyed many other graves including the tomb of Prophet Daniel and the mosque and Tomb of Prophet Jonah. But when they came across their most beloved they recorded the grave and left it. Subhan^Allah, may Allah guide them and remove the black from their hearts. Ameen
@shahidhussain9176 the hadith goes as follows, "Sahih Bukhari, Muhammad asks Allah to bless the areas of Bilad al-Sham (Syria) and Yemen. When his companions said "Our Najd as well," he replied: There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the head (i.e. horns) of Satan." The companions said "our" najd so tell me, were the companions from Iraq or Iran?
@shahidhussain9176 The first three hadith you stated, the Companions said "our" najd than the Prophet said there will he earthquakes and the horn of the devil will come out from there, obviously he was talking about future events, when the mehdi than the dajjal appears, there will be earthquakes in Saudi and its said all the hypocrites from the land will run away, the Saudis have built a building on the same mountain the Prophet said the dajjal will reside on the outskirts of Mecca and madina as we know he will not be able to enter, you can see this building and the Prophet's hadith on a video on RUclips. The signs are clear, the Saudis were plotting to move the Prophet from his grave so no one could visit him, this was widely spread on the news look it up, also turning Prophet's wifes house into toilets. "British daily Independent published a report by Daniel Howden in which it revealed extent of destruction caused to Islam's diverse heritage in the holy cities of Makkah and Medinah …A car Park on the birth place of the Prophet (saw), Bulldozed and Gasoline poured on the grave of the mother of the Prophet (saw), Lavatories built on the house of Sayyedah Khadijah (sa)." This Saudi government originated from "najd" you can look that up aswell my brother and you decide who the hadith is referencing.
@shahidhussain9176 It is striking that not one of the great muhaddiths, mufassirs, grammarians, historians, or legists of Islam has emerged from the region known as Najd, despite the extraordinary and blessed profusion of such people in other Muslim lands. This essay offers to Muslims with open minds an explanation of this remarkable fact. The Hadith of Najd: a correction The land of Najd, which for two centuries has been the crucible of the Wahhabi doctrine, is the subject of a body of interesting hadiths and early narrations which repay close analysis. Among the best-known of these hadiths is the relation of Imam al-Bukhari in which Ibn Umar said: ‘The Prophet (s.w.s.) mentioned: “O Allah, give us baraka in our Syria, O Allah, give us baraka in our Yemen.” They said: “And in our Najd?” and he said: “O Allah, give us baraka in our Syria, O Allah, give us baraka in our Yemen.” They said: “And in our Najd?” and I believe that he said the third time: “In that place are earthquakes, and seditions, and in that place shall rise the devil’s horn [qarn al-shaytan].”’ This hadith is clearly unpalatable to the Najdites themselves, some of whom to this day strive to persuade Muslims from more reputable districts that the hadith does not mean what it clearly says. One device used by such apologists is to utilise a definition which includes Iraq in the frontiers of Najd. By this manoeuvre, the Najdis draw the conclusion that the part of Najd which is condemned so strongly in this hadith is in fact Iraq, and that Najd proper is excluded. Medieval Islamic geographers contest this inherently strange thesis (see for instance Ibn Khurradadhbih, al-Masalik wa’l-mamalik [Leiden, 1887], 125; Ibn Hawqal, Kitab Surat al-ard [Beirut, 1968],18); and limit the northern extent of Najd at Wadi al-Rumma, or to the deserts to the south of al-Mada’in. There is no indication that the places in which the second wave of sedition arose, such as Kufa and Basra, were associated in the mind of the first Muslims with the term ‘Najd’. On the contrary, these places are in every case identified as lying within the land of Iraq. The evasion of this early understanding of the term in order to exclude Najd, as usually understood, from the purport of the hadith of Najd, has required considerable ingenuity from pro-Najdi writers in the present day. Some apologists attempt to conflate this hadith with a group of other hadiths which associate the ‘devil’s horn’ with ‘the East’, which is supposedly a generic reference to Iraq. While it is true that some late-medieval commentaries also incline to this view, modern geographical knowledge clearly rules it out. Even the briefest glimpse at a modern atlas will show that a straight line drawn to the east of al-Madina al-Munawwara does not pass anywhere near Iraq, but passes some distance to the south of Riyadh; that is to say, through the exact centre of Najd. The hadiths which speak of ‘the East’ in this context hence support the view that Najd is indicated, not Iraq. On occasion the pro-Najdi apologists also cite the etymological sense of the Arabic word najd, which means ‘high ground’. Again, a brief consultation of an atlas resolves this matter decisively. With the exception of present-day northern Iraq, which was not considered part of Iraq by any Muslim until the present century (it was called ‘al-Jazira’), Iraq is notably flat and low-lying, much of it even today being marshland, while the remainder, up to and well to the north of Baghdad, is flat, low desert or agricultural land. Najd, by contrast, is mostly plateau, culminating in peaks such as Jabal Tayyi’ (1300 metres), in the Jabal Shammar range. It is hard to see how the Arabs could have routinely applied a topographic term meaning ‘upland’ to the flat terrain of southern Iraq (the same territory which proved so suitable for tank warfare during the 1991 ‘Gulf War’, that notorious source of dispute between Riyadh’s ‘Cavaliers’ and ‘Roundheads’). Confirmation of this identification is easily located in the hadith literature, which contains numerous references to Najd, all of which clearly denote Central Arabia. To take a few examples out of many dozens: there is the hadith narrated by Abu Daud (Salat al-Safar, 15), which runs: ‘We went out to Najd with Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) until we arrived at Dhat al-Riqa‘, where he met a group from Ghatafan [a Najdite tribe].’ In Tirmidhi (Hajj, 57), there is the record of an encounter between the Messenger (s.w.s.) and a Najdi delegation which he received at Arafa (see also Ibn Maja, Manasik, 57). In no such case does the Sunna indicate that Iraq was somehow included in the Prophetic definition of ‘Najd’. Further evidence can be cited from the cluster of hadiths which identify the miqat points for pilgrims. In a hadith narrated by Imam Nasa’i (Manasik al-Hajj, 22), ‘A’isha (r.a.) declared that ‘Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) established the miqat for the people of Madina at Dhu’l-Hulayfa, for the people of Syria and Egypt at al-Juhfa, for the people of Iraq at Dhat Irq, and for the people of Najd at Qarn, and for the Yemenis at Yalamlam.’ Imam Muslim (Hajj, 2) narrates a similar hadith: ‘for the people of Madina it is Dhu’l-Hulayfa - while on the other road it is al-Juhfa - for the people of Iraq it is Dhat Irq, for the people of Najd it is Qarn, and for the people of Yemen it is Yalamlam.’ These texts constitute unarguable proof that the Prophet (s.w.s.) distinguished between Najd and Iraq, so much so that he appointed two separate miqat points for the inhabitants of each. For him, clearly, Najd did not include Iraq.
@shahidhussain9176 There are many hadiths in which the Messenger (s.w.s.) praised particular lands. It is significant that although Najd is the closest of lands to Makka and Madina, it is not praised by any one of these hadiths. The first hadith cited above shows the Messenger’s willingness to pray for Syria and Yemen, and his insistent refusal to pray for Najd. And wherever Najd is mentioned, it is clearly seen as a problematic territory. Consider, for instance, the following noble hadith: Amr ibn Abasa said: ‘Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) was one day reviewing the horses, in the company of Uyayna ibn Hisn ibn Badr al-Fazari. [...] Uyayna remarked: “The best of men are those who bear their swords on their shoulders, and carry their lances in the woven stocks of their horses, wearing cloaks, and are the people of the Najd.” But Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) replied: “You lie! Rather, the best of men are the men of the Yemen. Faith is a Yemeni, the Yemen of [the tribes of] Lakhm and Judham and Amila. [...] Hadramawt is better than the tribe of Harith; one tribe is better than another; another is worse [...] My Lord commanded me to curse Quraysh, and I cursed them, but he then commanded me to bless them twice, and I did so [...] Aslam and Ghifar, and their associates of Juhaina, are better than Asad and Tamim and Ghatafan and Hawazin, in the sight of Allah on the Day of Rising. [...] The most numerous tribe in the Garden shall be [the Yemeni tribes of] Madhhij and Ma’kul.’ (Ahmad ibn Hanbal and al-Tabarani, by sound narrators. Cited in Ali ibn Abu Bakr al-Haythami, Majma‘ al-zawa’id wa manba‘ al-fawa’id [Cairo, 1352], X, 43). The Messenger says ‘You lie!’ to a man who praises Najd. Nowhere does he extol Najd - quite the contrary. But other hadiths in praise of other lands abound. For instance: Umm Salama narrated that Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) gave the following counsel on his deathbed: ‘By Allah, I adjure you by Him, concerning the Egyptians, for you shall be victorious over them, and they will be a support for you and helpers in Allah’s path.’ (Tabarani, classed by al-Haythami as sahih [Majma‘, X, 63].) (For more on the merit of the Egyptians see Sahih Muslim, commentary by Imam al-Nawawi [Cairo, 1347], XVI, 96-7.) Qays ibn Sa‘d narrated that Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) said: ‘Were faith to be suspended from the Pleiades, men from the sons of Faris [south-central Iran] would reach it.’ (Narrated in the Musnads of both Abu Ya‘la and al-Bazzar, classified as Sahih by al-Haythami. Majma‘, X, 64-5. See further Nawawi’s commentary to Sahih Muslim, XVI, 100.) Allah’s Messenger said: ‘Tranquillity (sakina) is in the people of the Hijaz.’ (al-Bazzar, cited in Haythami, X, 53.) On the authority of Abu’l-Darda (r.a.), the Messenger of Allah (s.w.s.) said: ‘You will find armies. An army in Syria, in Egypt, in Iraq and in the Yemen.’ (Bazzar and Tabarani, classified as sahih: al-Haythami, Majma‘, X, 58.) This constitutes praise for these lands as homes of jihad volunteers. ‘The angels of the All-Compassionate spread their wings over Syria.’ (Tabarani, classed as sahih: Majma‘, X, 60. See also Tirmidhi, commentary of Imam Muhammad ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Mubarakfuri: Tuhfat al-Ahwadhi bi-sharh Jami‘ al-Tirmidhi, X, 454; who confirms it as hasan sahih.) Abu Hurayra narrated that Allah’s Messenger (s) said: ‘The people of Yemen have come to you. They are tenderer of heart, and more delicate of soul. Faith is a Yemeni, and wisdom is a Yemeni.’ (Tirmidhi, Fi fadl al-Yaman, no.4028. Mubarakfuri, X, 435, 437: hadith hasan sahih. On page 436 Imam Mubarakfuri points out that the ancestors of the Ansar were from the Yemen.) ‘The people of the Yemen are the best people on earth’. (Abu Ya‘la and Bazzar, classified as sahih. Haythami, X, 54-5.) Allah’s Messenger (s) sent a man to one of the clans of the Arabs, but they insulted and beat him. He came to Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) and told him what had occurred. And the Messenger (s) said, ‘Had you gone to the people of Oman, they would not have insulted or beaten you.’ (Muslim, Fada’il al-Sahaba, 57. See Nawawi’s commentary, XVI, 98: ‘this indicates praise for them, and their merit.’) The above hadiths are culled from a substantial corpus of material which records the Messenger (s.w.s.) praising neighbouring regions. Again, it is striking that although Najd was closer than any other, hadiths in praise of it are completely absent. This fact is generally known, although not publicised, by Najdites themselves. It is clear that if there existed a single hadith that names and praises Najd, they would let the Umma know. In an attempt to circumvent or neutralise the explicit and implicit Prophetic condemnation of their province, some refuse to consider that the territorial hadiths might be in any way worthy of attention, and focus their comments on the tribal groupings who dwell in Najd.
@shahidhussain9176 It is well-known that the Najdi reformer, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, was a Tamimi. The violence and takfir associated with the movement which carries his name surely bears more than a coincidental resemblance to the policies and mindset of the Tamimi Kharijites of ancient Najd. Consider, for instance, the following massacre, of the Shi‘a of Karbala in April 1801, as described by a Wahhabi historian: Saud made for Karbala with his victorious army, famous pedigree horses, and all the settled people and bedouin of Najd [...] The Muslims (i.e. the Wahhabis) surrounded Karbala and took it by storm. They killed most of the people in the markets and houses. One cannot count their spoils. They stayed there for just one morning, and left after midday, taking away all the possessions. Nearly two thousand people were killed in Karbala. (Uthman ibn Bishr, Unwan al-Majd fi Tarikh Najd [Makka, 1349], 1, 121-122.) It is hard to distinguish this raid, and the brutality of its accomplishment, from the Khariji raids from Najd into the same region a thousand years earlier. Muhammad Finati, an Italian revert to Islam who served with the Caliphal army which defeated the Wahhabis, wrote a long first-hand account of the extreme barbarism of the Najdi hordes. For instance: Such among us as fell alive into the hands of these cruel fanatics, were wantonly mutilated by the cutting off of their arms and legs, and left to perish in that state, some of whom, in the course of our retreat, I myself actually saw, who had no greater favour to ask than that we would put them to death. (G. Finati, Narrative of the Life and Adventures of Giovanni Finati [London, 1830], I, 287.) It is sometimes claimed that the days when ‘all the settled people and bedouin of Najd’ would happily commit such mass murder are long gone, and that Wahhabism has become more moderate. But another, more recent example, shows otherwise. In 1924, the Wahhabi army entered the city of Ta’if, plundering it for three days. The chief qadi and the ulema were dragged from their houses and slaughtered, while several hundred other civilians lost their lives. (Ibn Hizlul, Tarikh Muluk Al Sa‘ud [Riyadh, 1961], pp.151-3.) After giving the the Sunni population of the Hijaz this terrorist lesson, ‘Ibn Saud occupied Mecca with Britain’s tacit blessing’ (Alexei Vassiliev, A History of Saudi Arabia [London, 1998], p.264). A good deal of material concerning Najd and Tamim has been preserved from the time of the Salaf. If we reject the method of some Najdi apologists, a method based on the highly selective quotation of hadiths coupled with the blind imitation of opinions expressed by late-medieval commentary writers, we may reach some reasonably settled and authoritative conclusions regarding Central Arabia and its people. The Qur’an, the sound Hadith, and the experience of the Salaf overwhelmingly concur that Central Arabia is a region of fitna. The first of all fitnas in Islam emerged from that place, notably the arrogance of Dhu’l-Khuwaysira and his like, and also the apostasy and fondness for false prophets which caused such difficulty for Abu Bakr (r.a.). Subsequently, the Kharijite heresy, overwhelmingly Najdi in its roots, cast a long shadow over the early history of Islam, dividing the Muslims, distracting their armies from the task of conquering Byzantium, and injecting rancour, suspicion, and bitterness among the very earliest generations of Muslims. Only the most determined, blinkered and irresponsible Najdi sympathiser could ignore this evidence, transmitted so reliably from the pure Salaf, and persist in the delusion that Najd and the misguided, literalistic rigorism which it recurrently produces, is somehow an area favoured by Allah. And Allah knows best. May He unite the Umma through love for the early Muslims who refused bigotry, and may He preserve us from the trap of Kharijism and those who are attracted to its mindset in our time. Ameen.
In Surah Yunus, Ayah 58, the Qur'an states: "In the bounty of Allah and in His mercy, let them rejoice; that is better than what they accumulate." This emphasizes that true joy comes from Allah's blessings and mercy, which surpass any material wealth. Similarly, in Surah Al-Anbiya, Ayah 107, the Qur'an declares: "And We have not sent you, [O Muhammad], except as a mercy to the worlds." This verse highlights that the greatest blessing from Allah to humanity is the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, who was sent as a mercy to all creation. Therefore, given that the Prophet ﷺ embodies Allah's supreme mercy and blessing, and considering that the Qur'an encourages rejoicing in Allah's bounty and mercy, it follows that celebrating the Mawlid of the Prophet ﷺ is a fitting expression of gratitude and joy for this unparalleled divine blessing. May Allah SWT guide you.
@@TheQuran732- It seems you may not have thoroughly reviewed the tafsir of the scholars you mentioned. You often seek proofs from the Quran and Hadith regarding our Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), but when scholars from Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaat present these proofs, you often dismiss them. Tafsir Ibn Kathir, for instance, highlights and emphasizes that the Prophet ﷺ is described as a mercy to the worlds, as indicated in the verse: وَمَآ أَرْسَلْنَـكَ إِلَّا رَحْمَةً لِّلْعَـلَمِينَ (And We have sent you not but as a mercy for the worlds). This verse shows that Muhammad ﷺ was sent as a mercy to all people, and those who accept and appreciate this mercy will find happiness both in this world and the Hereafter. Conversely, those who reject it and turn away will face loss in this life and the next, as emphasized in the verse: أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الَّذِينَ بَدَّلُوا نِعْمَتَ اللَّهِ كُفْرًا وَأَحَلُّوا قَوْمَهُمْ دَارَ الْبَوَارِ (Have you not seen those who have exchanged the blessings of Allah for disbelief, leading their people to the house of destruction, Hell, where they will burn-an evil place to settle in?).
Translation: Say: "In the bounty of God. And in His Mercy, in that "LET THEM REJOICE" : that is better than the (wealth) they hoard (Surah Yunus, 10:58) Imam Ibn al-Jawzi (rah) explains 10:58 in his Tafsir: أن فضل الله: العلم، ورحمته: محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم، رواه الضحاك عن ابن عباس. Translation: ad-Dhahak narrated from Ibn Abbas (ra) that Bounty mentioned in this verse means Knowledge (i.e of Qur'an and Tawhid) whereas Mercy means Muhammad (Salallaho alaihi wasalam) [Ibn Jawzi Z'ad al Maseer fi Ilm at Tafsir, (4/40)] Imam Abu Hayyan al Andalusi (Rahimuhullah) also says: الفضل العلم والرحمة محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم Translation: Bounty refers to Knowledge whereas Mercy refers to Muhammad (salallaho alaihi wasalam) [Tafsir Al-Bahr al Muheet, (5/171 Imam Jalal uddin Suyuti (Rahimuhullah) says وأخرج أبو الشيخ عن ابن عباس رضي الله عنهما في الآية قال: فضل الله العلم، ورحمته محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم، قال الله تعالى { وما أرسلناك إلا رحمة للعالمين } [الأنبياء: 107]. Abu Sheikh (rah) narrated from Ibn Abbas (RA) That Bounty of Allah means Knowledge, whereas Mercy means Muhammad (Salallaho alaihi wasalam) Allah Ta'ala said: We have sent thee not but as Mercy to Worlds (Al Anbiya: 107) [As-Suyuti in Dur al Manthur (4/330 Allama Aloosi (rah) explains that even Fadhl (i.e. bounty) refers to Prophet Muhammad (salallaho alaihi wassalam) وأخرج الخطيب وابن عساكر عنه تفسير الفضل بالنبـي عليه الصلاة والسلام Narrated by Al Khatib (rah) and Ibn Asakir (rah) that Bounty refers to An-Nabi (Alaih Salatu Wassalam) [Al-Alusi in Ruh al Ma’ani (11/141)]
These ayaat were revealed to our Prophet ﷺ yet we have no evidences of the celebrations we see today. None of the sahaaba celebrated like people do today. A person who lives near me has a flag in his garden and a nalain image on his window. This person was doing giyarvi last month. I asked him what date was our Prophet ﷺ born? He said 12 of Rabi Ul Awwal. I said why does the person for whom you do giyarvi say that our Prophet ﷺ was born on 10 Muharram? I didn’t get an answer but just a taunt that I’m a wahabi
@@TheQuran732- You’ve just acknowledged that Muhammad (SAW) is a profound mercy to mankind, the greatest blessing we could ever receive. Given this, isn’t it fitting for us to celebrate this gift with immense joy and gratitude? It’s surprising to see a lack of understanding regarding the term "mawlid," which simply means "birth." If we can celebrate personal milestones like birthdays or special days, why question the celebration of the Prophet’s birth? It seems rather misguided to question the term "mawlid" when you might not fully understand its meaning while claiming to be knowledgeable. Similarly, if you ask where the Quran mentions celebrating events like Saudi Conference Day or starting a RUclips channel, remember that the Quran doesn’t address every modern practice explicitly. Your personal milestones are celebrated without specific Quranic guidance, so why question the celebration of the Prophet’s birth when he is the biggest blessing to servants like us and we will keep rejoicing the this blessing of allah swt until the end of eternity unlike people like you who acts otherwise and echo the attitude of Iblees, who was discontent and unwilling to honor what was right.
THE MAWLID OF OUR BELOVED FINAL PROPHET & MESSENGER MUHAMMAD ﷺ IS 100% BID’AH. ALLAH ﷻ IS MY WITNESS I SPOKE OUT AGAINST SUCH A INNOVATION ☝🏼 STOP THIS AT ONCE. MAY ALLAH HELP US & GUIDE US 🤲🏼
@@grr.yh6ylu373stop the name calling. It is such a way of ignorants. When Allah advised Mosa to remind tbe Pharoah he said to do so in gentle and wise way, so he may incline to the truth. You have no sense what so ever. Antagonist and ignorant at the same time is a bad combination. So remain silent.
Prophet salalahu Aley wasalam and his swahaba and the four imams were wahabis because they didn't celebrate maulid or wahabis follow prophet and swahaba and four imamas they are wahabis.?
As salaamu alykum. MashaAllah. Celebrating the birth of our beloved Nani (S.A.W) is not a bad Biddah (innovation of the Deenof Islam). Even if we don’t know exactly which day he was born we always celebrate the coming of the light with great delight. It’s your choice how you want to show love for the Nabi S.A.W but we only worship Allah alone. We love and send salutations for the sake of Allah. If you have a problem with the Mawlid then how do you express your love for the Nabi S.A.W? I believe there are different ways according to the different cultures in different parts of the world. Just because the Nabi S.A.W or Sahaaabah didn’t do something doesn’t mean it’s forbidden. An example of a good biddah is when saydnah Umar (R.A) said praying taraweegh salaah in a group together in Ramadan is a good biddah. A bad biddah is something introduced to the Deen that has no benefit or is harmful and causes disunity which is clear to see that it will lead to the fire. A good biddah is something that promotes love for the sake of Allah and should bring people closer to Allah and Islam. It could be a good form of dawah inshaAllah. Allah says in the Quran that He and the angels sends salutations continuously on the Nabi Mohammad S.A.W - Peace be upon him, and Allah commands us in the same ayat that the believers should do the same. Allah knows best, may Allah guide us Muslims and keep us on the straight path, Aameen.
Some najdi fellas dont understand that if mawlid was directly celebrated by the sahaba, it wouldve been a sunnah. Where do we say that its sunnah? We say its mustahab. Then why are you compelled to ask for daleel for it being sunnah, like did the messenger sallallahu alaihi wasallam do it, or the sahaba do it, etc.? For being mustahab, the hadith of ameere muawiya radiyallahu taala anhu is enough, that the sahaba gathered to thank allah subhanahu wa taala for sending the best of creations sallallahu alaihi wasallam among them. Overall, they have no evidence for it being impermissible. Now some may copypaste the hadith of bidah al dwalalah but they won't explain what is bidah al dwalalah acc to sunnah. And why syeduna umar radiyallahu taala anhu said, haadha nèmatul bidàh?
Even a jahil knows the two types of bid’ah. Shar’i, and linguistic. In linguistic, yes there is good and bad bid’ah. In shar’i, no. There is only bid’ah dalalah. Every bid’ah is dalalah. You guys literally cry when i quote wat the prophet said ﷺ EVERY. BID’AH. IS. DALALAH!!!!!
Basicly he agrees that the prophet nor the sahaba did any of this stuff but he argues that you are not misguided and a innovator if you do these rituals. And then his proof is a quote in a book from a sheikh
Sir,that is a serious problem with the Arab religion.There are Molvis, Scholars,intellectuals at different times and different places saying/ writing/interpreting one issue in contrarian ways.And that creates very serious problems in monotheistic concept.
Nah. Those who say it's not permissible have zero evidence to say so. We have enough for it being permissible. Before the rise of the Wahabi sect, there was no conflict. Even if it was, it wasn't of a level that ya call your brother a polytheist
MAWLID IS BIDA'AH BIDA'AH means that you're doing something which the prophet did not do. That means you are claiming that Muhammad has left this deen incomplete, that you're doing something good which the prophet did not do or the companions. Wallahi hadha suuul amalu min ashaytan.
MAWLID IS NOT BIDA'AH, there are evidences/daleel from our Deen but you people hate the birth of Rasoolullah. And your reason is stupid, go ride a camel instead of a car bc that's also bidaa. Don't read the Quran on your phone bc that's bidaa. Don't pray in a masjid where there's a carpet, fan, telescreen or even a clock bc that's also bidaa. And if you attended a birthday gathering/ celebration for your family member, mother, wife or son you also did a bidaa. Someone involved in bidaa cannot accuse others of bida unless his imam is Abdul Wahhab Najdi. So, ask Allah for Aql before denouncing those who honour the coming of the Prophet Muhammad (Sallahu alaihi wasalam) in this world, while people like you do nothing!
Doesn't mean that we have to take your fatwa of bidah and say that imam Ibn Hajar, imam suyuti, imam Ibn Hajar makki, Shah Abdul haq muhaddith dehlawi, aal of them made mistakes
In the region of azad Kashmir our grandparents had never heard of mawlid until Very recently. People use to have "hatama nabuwat" during this month. Someone bought this new mawlid discos to our region.
Bring imam Ibn hajar al asqalani, or imam as-suyuti, or any other infront of me saying that mawlid is okay and good. I don’t care. I’d rather follow the prophet ﷺ. With all respect to the great ‘ulama, they can all sit down and be silent like good boys when they contradict the prophet ﷺ.
scholar bashing/propping and name calling is all this is. It is literally said in the video by Assuyuti that it is a 'good' biddah, not a doing of the Sahaba or any of the Salaf of the Ummah. The only disagreement is that RasulAllah SAW did not make a distinction when he said all Biddah is in hellfire, why do the scholars after him do this. The hadith this brother mentions he does not quote so the entire argument is that a scholar you quote from said it's a good biddah so it is okay to do.
It is strange he didn't read fatwa in his own language and top of that he didn't mention how it is permissible! In India, people celebrate mowlid like idol worshiper celebrate by coming on street with DJ and statues of doms. Christians celebrate their saints and Jesus birthday, and prophet ﷺ has prohibited us to follow their ways.
Stop celebrating...stop your excuses for a clear Bid'ah...nobody even knows the actual birth date of Rasul Allah saw (why do you think this knowledge was withheld from us by Allah Jallahu'ala)... think and save yourselves...good practice... Next you will say climbing on top of a coconut tree and sitting like a monkey screaming out Da'wah is good practice... wake up...we have the examples of the 3 best generations... don't add more
Why the Deobandi and Barelwi are so quiet in showing solidarity with Palestinians? Sitting on the fence or some other reason? There is a National Rally this weekend in Liverpool at the Labour Party conference. 🍉
The Wali Watches Sexual Relations of his Students is Endorsed by Ahmed Raza Khan. Please someone Refute the Explicit Story as its too much for Sufies 😊.. In "Al Malfuz Ash Sharif v 2 pg 232. Ahmad Raza Khan Said as Quotes Shaykh Ahmad Ibn Mubarak Saljamasai had two wives. His Murshid one spoke to him about this and that dialogue was as follows: Murshid:- Last Night to spent the night 🌙 with one wife while the other was awake. This is not a correct thing to do. Murid:- O Master! the other wife was asleep. Murshid:- No, she was not asleep. Murid:- Oh Master! how do you know that my second wife was not asleep. Murshid:- Do you have a spare bed in the room where your second wife sleeps. Murid:- Yes my Master. Murshid:- I Was Present on that spare bed 😅. Botched Aqeedah made in Hindustan by Barailwies. Thats why Fairy Tale Barailwisms foundations are baseless Lies and a million miles from the Actual Sunnah. May Allaah Exalted and Most High Guide us all.
@@mdkhan3928 ok so this means the prophet never forbade it, tha sahabas likewise, the 4 imams likewise, the grand maulid is introduced in the 6th century by king Mudhaffar and ulama of his time acknowledged it! Fast forward to 12th century enter the era of wahabbism, maulid now becomes the worst innovation! Bro who's fooling who!
Both of those are false misconceptions. The Fatimids celebrated the birthday of Imam Ali NOT of Prophet Muhammad. As for Salahuddin, he instituted it's celebration not banned it !
@@AbdullahAburob24 no they don't, the only thing that says otherwise is wahhabi liars who speak to people like you that don't actually read those books
No "good bidah"" Ya Allah help them. What about the Quran.. did we have books during the time of the sahabahs or our Prophet... Books in general??? Prayer rugs? They prayed on animal skins.. Nothing about birthdays, books, Prayer rugs adds to the religious aspect of Islam. Yall be out there having full blown baby showers, weddings, big halls for walimahs.. extravagance at its best..
A bidah is a bidah. There's no good bidah. Stop justifying something by calling others who do not agree with this ignominy wahabis. You are the one who is leading others astray.
@@louisdeniau8571 know how to make the distinction. Celebration of birthdays is never a good bidah even of our prophets (pnut). Why don't you celebrate Christmas???
Al_Suyuti gives you your religion? He affirms the Fatimid “parade” and you are ok with it? Something about Muslims who KNOW they are going to Paradise always rubs me the wrong way. AlSuyuti,,, not AbuBakr, not Omar, not Uthman, not Ali RAnhum? Weird…
Imām Al-Hafidh ibn Hajar 773H Imām Jalaalud Dīn As-Suyooti 849H These scholars are not the scholars of old, they are very recent. Even if they did permit this then we don't take their word. Is there a proof ? Why didn't you read it? Why didn't you read their Fatawi? This video has absolutely no benefit. Edit: I respect these scholars and look up to them, I also acknowledge that all scholars err expect our noble Messenger Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم. It is you Sufi Mubtadi'ah who do not respect the sahabah, by erroneously saying they did not love the messenger by performing this Baatil Mawlid that has no proof whatsoever.
First say 'IMAM' SUYUTI AND 'IMAM' IBN HAJAR Yeah so you have more knowledge than imam jalaluddin suyuti and Imam Hafidh ibn hajar , I know you didn't claim to knowledgeable person than them, but your words shows that you are more knowledgeable than them, not only them, but there other scholars IMAM Shawkani, IMAM Ibn Kathir are more older Great Scholars and from Salaf u saliheen !!
@@Shk.SaadAhmed Ya jahil Imam Suyuti Rahimahullah is a great scholar but he also erred in some things he is not A DALEEL. THE DALEEL is the Quran and the Sunnah and how the Salaf understood it. Name me one from the Salaf that celebrated Mawlid. You won't find any
Hasanul basari(r)is from the salaf and from first 3 generation ,is n't he?.. Do you know What he said.. he said that if he had gold equal to the Jabal Uhud ,he would have gave that completely for the mowlid... Ur problem is not evidence..... Ur problem is with rasool(s).....
The shaba were celebrating it by fasting every Monday. For those of us who are weak to fast every Monday and make gratitude on his birth, the Ulema have set us yearly memorial day.
Meelad Un Nabi 03 quran Proof No. 2 Qur'an states ذَلِكَ فَضْلُ اللَّهِ يُؤْتِيهِ مَنْ يَشَاءُ وَاللَّهُ ذُو الْفَضْلِ الْعَظِيمِ That is the bounty of Allah; which He giveth unto whom He will. Allah is of Infinite Bounty (وَاللَّهُ ذُو الْفَضْلِ الْعَظِيمِ ) (62:4) Hadrat Abdullah Ibn Abbas (Radhi Allah) explains “Allah is of infinite bounty” as: (Allah is of infinite bounty) by bestowing Islam and prophethood upon Muhammad (pbuh); and it is also said this means: by bestowing Islam upon the believers; and it is also said this means: by sending the Messenger and Scripture to His created beings. [Tanwir al Miqbas Min Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
Without Mawlid function the bareli speakers income ends. We don't see barelvi speakers hosting functions at their own costs yet they preach it's fard to do so. 😂😂😂😂😂
Fear Allah there is no such things as wahhabis, if you mean the people warning for shirk like ALL the prophets used to do then yes they are on the right path
We have major difference with your aqeeda of tawassul and istigashah of Waliullah or Rasulullah.We consider it as a major shirk.Mawlid and other biddah of your are minor issues.
Everyone is entitled to they're own opinion... good innovation and bad innovation is still innovation and we was told by the prophet him self not to inovate. Im not very clued up on these things maybe im wrong but i think if it was something we should do then surely our prophet would have made it clear for us to do this practice.. but we should not separate and segregate and try to stick together what ever your beliefs are may allah guide us all, lets all agree to to disagree and eat some halwa
@@utgdomeyou’re really comparing kaafirs to a man who quoted undeniably authentic hadith in his works? And used nothing but the Quran and verified sunnah to prove his aqeedah and manhaj? You are very lost subhanAllah. If the mawlid is a bid’ah, good or not, (even though correctly I believe all bid’aat are misguidances as stated in numerous sahih hadith), that means it was innovated after the time of The Prophet ﷺ, however none of the sahabah, or any of the salaf at all celebrated it. So am I now a wahhabi for rejecting anything that those 3 golden generations did not do?
Labelling people who refuses mawalid as wahabis is poor way to win the argument. It is like you labelling the sahabas who didn't celebrate it to as Wahhabi
Don't listen to this. IT"S BID"A 100%, PERIOD. The Sahaabas (RA) were guaranteed Jannah while still living, how can they be wrong and then you believe someone else? Don't spread lies.
Maulid basically is the life history of our prophet (saw). Why all this unnecessary hullabaloo that it shouldn't be done is the works of enemies of lslam who created the wahabbi movement to be their loudmouths! Fox in a sheepskin!
No one is from the Salaf, Khalaf's are not hujjah even in the good innovation because Abdullah ibn Umar (RA) said "Every innovation is misguidance, even if they do with the good intention"
If unsure on any ISSUE of DEEN, especially our BELOVED MAULOOD SHAREEF ... Follow the teaching and guidance of our BELOVED AWLIYA IKRAAM R. A..... THE BELOVED MAULOOD HAS ALWAYS BEEN PERMISSIBLE as it's full of sawaabs ❤❤🌹🌹🌹🤲🤲🤲
Misguiding the Muslim ummah may allah guide you mawlid is a very Pakistani thing I am British pakistani and the Pakistani people at most are very misguided by people like this mawlid is not permissible end of story.
They accept the fact its a bidah. They claim they love the prophet more than the sahaba and they claim is to tantamount to saying that they understood the life of the prophet better than the sahaba.once a bida wala always a bidah wala
Bunch of nonsensical hot air and no actual point made as usual from these people. Barellwism/Sufis/Shia will never ever be able to prove that the greatest generations who lived with and loved the Prophet salAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam more than we ever could, ever took his birth date as a day of celebration during his life or after it. They are forced to resort to fanciful arguments, twisting texts and silly analogies and the writings of those who came hundreds of years later after the Shia innovated this practice. THIS is the real disease we have to deal with, not the silly straw man in this video.
Yes we will celebrate the Mawlid of our Holy Prophet صلی الله عليه وآله وسلم
now and always ان شاء الله
We are happy with our Holy Prophet
صلی الله عليه وآله وسلم
and we are happy with his coming to this world. And we are thankful to Allah ta’ala for making us from his ummah. الحمدُلِلّٰه
Love someone means follow his commandments....
Every innovation is a misguidance and every misguidance leads to the fire
And the Sahabe weren't. Imaam Maalik Shaafi3i Abou Hanifa and Ahmed weren't?
@zohaibmaqbool masha Allah, this generation must be better than first three generations because prophet peace be upon him, he said the best of generation is my generation, then next, then next, they never celebrated prophet MUHAMMAD peace be, birthday or the 4 imams, if they have please let me know. Jazk Allah khair
MashaAllah this brothers obsession with salafis runs deep lol
The birth of our Beloved Nabee-e-Kareem s.a.w.
Should be celebrated every day of our lives. Almighty ALLAAH send Nabee-e-Kareem s.a.w. as a mercy to mankind.
By following the lifestyle of the greatest man that set foot on this earth.
WE LOVERS OF OUR BELOVED NABI SALLALLAHU ALAIHIWA SALLAM will and always celebrate MAULOOD until our final breath, and it will continue with our progeny... Ameen 🌹
Follow his lifestyle, don't celebrate his birth. All biddah is in the hellfire. Don't be like the Christians.
إِنَّ أَصْدَقَ الْحَدِيثِ كِتَابُ اللَّهِ وَأَحْسَنَ الْهَدْيِ هَدْيُ مُحَمَّدٍ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَشَرُّ الْأُمُورِ مُحْدَثَاتُهَا وَكُلُّ مُحْدَثَةٍ بِدْعَةٌ وَكُلُّ بِدْعَةٍ ضَلَالَةٌ وَكُلُّ ضَلَالَةٍ فِي النَّارِ
من سن في الاسلام سنة حسنة فله اجرها و اجر من عمل بها..
و من سن في الاسلام سنة سيئة، فله وزرها و وزر من عمل بها.😊
@@UsthazKanzulAhmedyou have completely misinterpreted that hadith
@@AbuBakr-Siddiq Those who u learnt it from,the najdi shaithaan,is the one who started misinterpreting it.
😄
You just made mass takfir may allah guide you back to islam@@UsthazKanzulAhmed
@@AbuBakr-Siddiq You calling every scholar out there as a Mubatha'di is okay, but me calling the Najdi Shaithaan as Najdi Shaithaan is mass thakfeer?😀😀😀
Mawlid Mawlid with every breath of our lives... Celebrating Mawlid. In sha Allah azzawajall
I RESPECT ASRAR RASHID A LOT.
First video of his Ive watched. He does not quote the hadith he mentions and tries to discredit scholars who disagree with him. And fails at proving his arguments. All he and others have to do is tell us where RasulAllah SAW gave us permission to innovate a third eid (eid milad ul nabi as it is called in Pakistan) or celebrate his birth in anyway. Did he SAW or his Sahaba do this, did the Salaf of the Ummah do this? That's all.
You wish to celebrate the mawlid, then do it like the prophet (saw) has taught us, fast on the monday of every week, throughout the year. Worship of allah and doing the mawlid the sunnah way.
Sabhanallah, which three generations celebrated Prophets birthday?
None , this guy is trippin Akhi
@@obaidafzal818 which 3 celebrated Thanksgiving, baby showers, fathers day, mothers day..but go to any salafi community, and it's definitely going down like that...
The fact that you think the mawlid is the prophets birthday is your misconception, not those who rejoice at his birth and coming into this world as our prophet. It is not 1 day a year they rejoice, but daily, throughout their lives.
None, so what's your point?
How can people think they know better than the sahabah?
How can najdiyyah do all these thing that the Sahaba didn't do?? MADDAD AMREEKA. Siding with British to fight khilafa? Zionism? Destroying Islamic heritage? Takfir of majority of Muslims?
@n.a.1397 you didn't answer his question. Now let me ask you. Did the greatest companion Abu Bakr As Siddiq رضي الله عنهم celebrate mawlid the way the sufis do today? If so bring your reference
@@AbuBakr-Siddiq if the sahaba had done so, it would've been a sunnah. Where do we say it's sunnah? We say it's mustahab. For being mustahab the Hadith of ameere muawiya radiyallahu taala anhu is enough, that the sahaba gathered and thanked allah subhanahu wa taala for sending the best of creations sallallahu alaihi wasallam among them.
Overall, you have no proof of it being impermissible. Ya may put up the Hadith of bidah al dwalalah but you will not explain what is bidah al dwalalah acc to sunnah.
@@AbuBakr-Siddiqbring the evidence he didn’t, bring your references.
Islam does not work like that. The ijma of the ummah is the burden of proof is upon the claimant. You people beleive mawlid is a sunnah so the burden of proof is upon you to prove either Muhammad ﷺ or the Khulifa ar rashideen did this@CEO786
Imaam Maalik rahimahullah said:
"He who innovates an innovation in Islaam regarding it as something good, has claimed that Muhammad ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ has betrayed his trust to deliver the message as Allaah says:
{This day have I perfected for you your religion}. [Surah al-Maaidah (5): 3]
And whatsoever was not part of the religion then, is not part of the religion
today."
Oh do you know that when anyone visited imam Malik his servant would ask if he has visited for fiqh or for listening hadith for prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam. If he said about fiqh then imam Malik would normally tell him that.
If he said otherwise, then imam malik would go in, perform ghusl, wear a good jhubba and imamah, apply itr, sit on a takht, only after which he would proceed further, as reported by imam quazi ayadh in his book 'al shifa'
So please don't try to misquote the imams cuz that would imply that they didn't follow their own sayings
@MotorWorld-v8y and that ayah that you mentioned you know that wasn't the last ayah revealed ? Maybe because you watches the movie "the message" you think that's the case but there was ayahs revealed to our prophet after that ayah, so if that's your belief than what do you say about the ayahs revealed after that ayah??? May Allah guide you
Give the sanad lol you won’t be able to
Imam Malik from the Imams of the salaf.
@Hashim_Naysapuri the 4 Imams are considered from the salaf
Started by the Fatimids Shia of Egypt ofcourse.🤷🏿♂️
Even your cult was started by the Najdi Shaithaan.
😂
@@UsthazKanzulAhmed Nope! Ahmed Ibn Hanbal/Malik/Shafi'i
...& btw no eid milaad un Nabi by them either.🤷🏿♂️😏
@@UsthazKanzulAhmed Relax bro it's only a discussion.🤷🏿♂️
@@UsthazKanzulAhmedSahih al-Bukhari 46 read this hadith akhi it's about a man from najd who met the prophet ﷺ watch your tongue brother may allah guide us to the truth
That's True but they don't want to hear that
Alas such a good practice was missed by Abu Bakr as siddiq, umar Bin khattab, uthman Bin affan, Ali Bin abu Talib........and so on some 1.2 lakh Sahaba May Allah be pleased with them all
So we don't know the exact date of birth of the Prophet ﷺ but know exactly when he passed away.
Those celebrating, what are you exactly celebrating? His passing? Think again.
May Allah Protect and Guide us all. Ameen.
When did he passed away ? mention the source..
The Prophet said the horn of the devil will come from najd, now tell me who else the Prophet was talking about? subhan^Allah.
They say Allah resides on top of his throne, they attribute physical parts to Allah, haven't they heard the verse "He doesn't resemble any of the creation, he is the all hearing, all seeing" the Mawlid is far from their biggest problem, but the very thing that diffretuates between a beliver and a non-believer the belief that Allah does not resemble the creation and that you cannot attribute a place, and time to him, as he is the creator of time and place. Allah created everything from water.
The first creation is water. The Prophet, sallallahu ^alayhi wa sallam, said:
[Innallaha ta^ala khalaqa kulla shay’im minal-ma’.]
Which means: “Allah created everything from water.” (Related by Ibn Hibban.)
So if Allah created water first than from the water created the arsh, how can they say he resides ontop of the throne. This indicates that Allah was in a space then moved on top of the throne. Alhamdulillah for ahlul-sunnah-wal-jammah. If they had a chance they would move the Prophets grave so no one would visit him as Saudi once wanted to to. (This can be found online and many articles were written on this)
But there sheikh ibn taymiahh they left his grave, and destroyed many other graves including the tomb of Prophet Daniel and the mosque and Tomb of Prophet Jonah. But when they came across their most beloved they recorded the grave and left it. Subhan^Allah, may Allah guide them and remove the black from their hearts. Ameen
@shahidhussain9176 the hadith goes as follows, "Sahih Bukhari, Muhammad asks Allah to bless the areas of Bilad al-Sham (Syria) and Yemen. When his companions said "Our Najd as well," he replied: There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the head (i.e. horns) of Satan."
The companions said "our" najd so tell me, were the companions from Iraq or Iran?
@shahidhussain9176
The first three hadith you stated, the Companions said "our" najd than the Prophet said there will he earthquakes and the horn of the devil will come out from there, obviously he was talking about future events, when the mehdi than the dajjal appears, there will be earthquakes in Saudi and its said all the hypocrites from the land will run away, the Saudis have built a building on the same mountain the Prophet said the dajjal will reside on the outskirts of Mecca and madina as we know he will not be able to enter, you can see this building and the Prophet's hadith on a video on RUclips. The signs are clear, the Saudis were plotting to move the Prophet from his grave so no one could visit him, this was widely spread on the news look it up, also turning Prophet's wifes house into toilets.
"British daily Independent published a report by Daniel Howden in which it revealed extent of destruction caused to Islam's diverse heritage in the holy cities of Makkah and Medinah …A car Park on the birth place of the Prophet (saw), Bulldozed and Gasoline poured on the grave of the mother of the Prophet (saw), Lavatories built on the house of Sayyedah Khadijah (sa)."
This Saudi government originated from "najd" you can look that up aswell my brother and you decide who the hadith is referencing.
@shahidhussain9176
It is striking that not one of the great muhaddiths, mufassirs, grammarians, historians, or legists of Islam has emerged from the region known as Najd, despite the extraordinary and blessed profusion of such people in other Muslim lands. This essay offers to Muslims with open minds an explanation of this remarkable fact.
The Hadith of Najd: a correction
The land of Najd, which for two centuries has been the crucible of the Wahhabi doctrine, is the subject of a body of interesting hadiths and early narrations which repay close analysis. Among the best-known of these hadiths is the relation of Imam al-Bukhari in which Ibn Umar said: ‘The Prophet (s.w.s.) mentioned: “O Allah, give us baraka in our Syria, O Allah, give us baraka in our Yemen.” They said: “And in our Najd?” and he said: “O Allah, give us baraka in our Syria, O Allah, give us baraka in our Yemen.” They said: “And in our Najd?” and I believe that he said the third time: “In that place are earthquakes, and seditions, and in that place shall rise the devil’s horn [qarn al-shaytan].”’
This hadith is clearly unpalatable to the Najdites themselves, some of whom to this day strive to persuade Muslims from more reputable districts that the hadith does not mean what it clearly says. One device used by such apologists is to utilise a definition which includes Iraq in the frontiers of Najd. By this manoeuvre, the Najdis draw the conclusion that the part of Najd which is condemned so strongly in this hadith is in fact Iraq, and that Najd proper is excluded. Medieval Islamic geographers contest this inherently strange thesis (see for instance Ibn Khurradadhbih, al-Masalik wa’l-mamalik [Leiden, 1887], 125; Ibn Hawqal, Kitab Surat al-ard [Beirut, 1968],18); and limit the northern extent of Najd at Wadi al-Rumma, or to the deserts to the south of al-Mada’in. There is no indication that the places in which the second wave of sedition arose, such as Kufa and Basra, were associated in the mind of the first Muslims with the term ‘Najd’. On the contrary, these places are in every case identified as lying within the land of Iraq.
The evasion of this early understanding of the term in order to exclude Najd, as usually understood, from the purport of the hadith of Najd, has required considerable ingenuity from pro-Najdi writers in the present day. Some apologists attempt to conflate this hadith with a group of other hadiths which associate the ‘devil’s horn’ with ‘the East’, which is supposedly a generic reference to Iraq. While it is true that some late-medieval commentaries also incline to this view, modern geographical knowledge clearly rules it out. Even the briefest glimpse at a modern atlas will show that a straight line drawn to the east of al-Madina al-Munawwara does not pass anywhere near Iraq, but passes some distance to the south of Riyadh; that is to say, through the exact centre of Najd. The hadiths which speak of ‘the East’ in this context hence support the view that Najd is indicated, not Iraq.
On occasion the pro-Najdi apologists also cite the etymological sense of the Arabic word najd, which means ‘high ground’. Again, a brief consultation of an atlas resolves this matter decisively. With the exception of present-day northern Iraq, which was not considered part of Iraq by any Muslim until the present century (it was called ‘al-Jazira’), Iraq is notably flat and low-lying, much of it even today being marshland, while the remainder, up to and well to the north of Baghdad, is flat, low desert or agricultural land. Najd, by contrast, is mostly plateau, culminating in peaks such as Jabal Tayyi’ (1300 metres), in the Jabal Shammar range. It is hard to see how the Arabs could have routinely applied a topographic term meaning ‘upland’ to the flat terrain of southern Iraq (the same territory which proved so suitable for tank warfare during the 1991 ‘Gulf War’, that notorious source of dispute between Riyadh’s ‘Cavaliers’ and ‘Roundheads’).
Confirmation of this identification is easily located in the hadith literature, which contains numerous references to Najd, all of which clearly denote Central Arabia. To take a few examples out of many dozens: there is the hadith narrated by Abu Daud (Salat al-Safar, 15), which runs: ‘We went out to Najd with Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) until we arrived at Dhat al-Riqa‘, where he met a group from Ghatafan [a Najdite tribe].’ In Tirmidhi (Hajj, 57), there is the record of an encounter between the Messenger (s.w.s.) and a Najdi delegation which he received at Arafa (see also Ibn Maja, Manasik, 57). In no such case does the Sunna indicate that Iraq was somehow included in the Prophetic definition of ‘Najd’.
Further evidence can be cited from the cluster of hadiths which identify the miqat points for pilgrims. In a hadith narrated by Imam Nasa’i (Manasik al-Hajj, 22), ‘A’isha (r.a.) declared that ‘Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) established the miqat for the people of Madina at Dhu’l-Hulayfa, for the people of Syria and Egypt at al-Juhfa, for the people of Iraq at Dhat Irq, and for the people of Najd at Qarn, and for the Yemenis at Yalamlam.’ Imam Muslim (Hajj, 2) narrates a similar hadith: ‘for the people of Madina it is Dhu’l-Hulayfa - while on the other road it is al-Juhfa - for the people of Iraq it is Dhat Irq, for the people of Najd it is Qarn, and for the people of Yemen it is Yalamlam.’
These texts constitute unarguable proof that the Prophet (s.w.s.) distinguished between Najd and Iraq, so much so that he appointed two separate miqat points for the inhabitants of each. For him, clearly, Najd did not include Iraq.
@shahidhussain9176
There are many hadiths in which the Messenger (s.w.s.) praised particular lands. It is significant that although Najd is the closest of lands to Makka and Madina, it is not praised by any one of these hadiths. The first hadith cited above shows the Messenger’s willingness to pray for Syria and Yemen, and his insistent refusal to pray for Najd. And wherever Najd is mentioned, it is clearly seen as a problematic territory. Consider, for instance, the following noble hadith:
Amr ibn Abasa said: ‘Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) was one day reviewing the horses, in the company of Uyayna ibn Hisn ibn Badr al-Fazari. [...] Uyayna remarked: “The best of men are those who bear their swords on their shoulders, and carry their lances in the woven stocks of their horses, wearing cloaks, and are the people of the Najd.” But Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) replied: “You lie! Rather, the best of men are the men of the Yemen. Faith is a Yemeni, the Yemen of [the tribes of] Lakhm and Judham and Amila. [...] Hadramawt is better than the tribe of Harith; one tribe is better than another; another is worse [...] My Lord commanded me to curse Quraysh, and I cursed them, but he then commanded me to bless them twice, and I did so [...] Aslam and Ghifar, and their associates of Juhaina, are better than Asad and Tamim and Ghatafan and Hawazin, in the sight of Allah on the Day of Rising. [...] The most numerous tribe in the Garden shall be [the Yemeni tribes of] Madhhij and Ma’kul.’ (Ahmad ibn Hanbal and al-Tabarani, by sound narrators. Cited in Ali ibn Abu Bakr al-Haythami, Majma‘ al-zawa’id wa manba‘ al-fawa’id [Cairo, 1352], X, 43).
The Messenger says ‘You lie!’ to a man who praises Najd. Nowhere does he extol Najd - quite the contrary. But other hadiths in praise of other lands abound. For instance:
Umm Salama narrated that Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) gave the following counsel on his deathbed: ‘By Allah, I adjure you by Him, concerning the Egyptians, for you shall be victorious over them, and they will be a support for you and helpers in Allah’s path.’ (Tabarani, classed by al-Haythami as sahih [Majma‘, X, 63].) (For more on the merit of the Egyptians see Sahih Muslim, commentary by Imam al-Nawawi [Cairo, 1347], XVI, 96-7.)
Qays ibn Sa‘d narrated that Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) said: ‘Were faith to be suspended from the Pleiades, men from the sons of Faris [south-central Iran] would reach it.’ (Narrated in the Musnads of both Abu Ya‘la and al-Bazzar, classified as Sahih by al-Haythami. Majma‘, X, 64-5. See further Nawawi’s commentary to Sahih Muslim, XVI, 100.)
Allah’s Messenger said: ‘Tranquillity (sakina) is in the people of the Hijaz.’ (al-Bazzar, cited in Haythami, X, 53.)
On the authority of Abu’l-Darda (r.a.), the Messenger of Allah (s.w.s.) said: ‘You will find armies. An army in Syria, in Egypt, in Iraq and in the Yemen.’ (Bazzar and Tabarani, classified as sahih: al-Haythami, Majma‘, X, 58.) This constitutes praise for these lands as homes of jihad volunteers.
‘The angels of the All-Compassionate spread their wings over Syria.’ (Tabarani, classed as sahih: Majma‘, X, 60. See also Tirmidhi, commentary of Imam Muhammad ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Mubarakfuri: Tuhfat al-Ahwadhi bi-sharh Jami‘ al-Tirmidhi, X, 454; who confirms it as hasan sahih.)
Abu Hurayra narrated that Allah’s Messenger (s) said: ‘The people of Yemen have come to you. They are tenderer of heart, and more delicate of soul. Faith is a Yemeni, and wisdom is a Yemeni.’ (Tirmidhi, Fi fadl al-Yaman, no.4028. Mubarakfuri, X, 435, 437: hadith hasan sahih. On page 436 Imam Mubarakfuri points out that the ancestors of the Ansar were from the Yemen.)
‘The people of the Yemen are the best people on earth’. (Abu Ya‘la and Bazzar, classified as sahih. Haythami, X, 54-5.)
Allah’s Messenger (s) sent a man to one of the clans of the Arabs, but they insulted and beat him. He came to Allah’s Messenger (s.w.s.) and told him what had occurred. And the Messenger (s) said, ‘Had you gone to the people of Oman, they would not have insulted or beaten you.’ (Muslim, Fada’il al-Sahaba, 57. See Nawawi’s commentary, XVI, 98: ‘this indicates praise for them, and their merit.’)
The above hadiths are culled from a substantial corpus of material which records the Messenger (s.w.s.) praising neighbouring regions. Again, it is striking that although Najd was closer than any other, hadiths in praise of it are completely absent.
This fact is generally known, although not publicised, by Najdites themselves. It is clear that if there existed a single hadith that names and praises Najd, they would let the Umma know. In an attempt to circumvent or neutralise the explicit and implicit Prophetic condemnation of their province, some refuse to consider that the territorial hadiths might be in any way worthy of attention, and focus their comments on the tribal groupings who dwell in Najd.
@shahidhussain9176
It is well-known that the Najdi reformer, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, was a Tamimi. The violence and takfir associated with the movement which carries his name surely bears more than a coincidental resemblance to the policies and mindset of the Tamimi Kharijites of ancient Najd. Consider, for instance, the following massacre, of the Shi‘a of Karbala in April 1801, as described by a Wahhabi historian:
Saud made for Karbala with his victorious army, famous pedigree horses, and all the settled people and bedouin of Najd [...] The Muslims (i.e. the Wahhabis) surrounded Karbala and took it by storm. They killed most of the people in the markets and houses. One cannot count their spoils. They stayed there for just one morning, and left after midday, taking away all the possessions. Nearly two thousand people were killed in Karbala. (Uthman ibn Bishr, Unwan al-Majd fi Tarikh Najd [Makka, 1349], 1, 121-122.)
It is hard to distinguish this raid, and the brutality of its accomplishment, from the Khariji raids from Najd into the same region a thousand years earlier.
Muhammad Finati, an Italian revert to Islam who served with the Caliphal army which defeated the Wahhabis, wrote a long first-hand account of the extreme barbarism of the Najdi hordes. For instance:
Such among us as fell alive into the hands of these cruel fanatics, were wantonly mutilated by the cutting off of their arms and legs, and left to perish in that state, some of whom, in the course of our retreat, I myself actually saw, who had no greater favour to ask than that we would put them to death. (G. Finati, Narrative of the Life and Adventures of Giovanni Finati [London, 1830], I, 287.)
It is sometimes claimed that the days when ‘all the settled people and bedouin of Najd’ would happily commit such mass murder are long gone, and that Wahhabism has become more moderate. But another, more recent example, shows otherwise. In 1924, the Wahhabi army entered the city of Ta’if, plundering it for three days. The chief qadi and the ulema were dragged from their houses and slaughtered, while several hundred other civilians lost their lives. (Ibn Hizlul, Tarikh Muluk Al Sa‘ud [Riyadh, 1961], pp.151-3.) After giving the the Sunni population of the Hijaz this terrorist lesson, ‘Ibn Saud occupied Mecca with Britain’s tacit blessing’ (Alexei Vassiliev, A History of Saudi Arabia [London, 1998], p.264).
A good deal of material concerning Najd and Tamim has been preserved from the time of the Salaf. If we reject the method of some Najdi apologists, a method based on the highly selective quotation of hadiths coupled with the blind imitation of opinions expressed by late-medieval commentary writers, we may reach some reasonably settled and authoritative conclusions regarding Central Arabia and its people. The Qur’an, the sound Hadith, and the experience of the Salaf overwhelmingly concur that Central Arabia is a region of fitna. The first of all fitnas in Islam emerged from that place, notably the arrogance of Dhu’l-Khuwaysira and his like, and also the apostasy and fondness for false prophets which caused such difficulty for Abu Bakr (r.a.). Subsequently, the Kharijite heresy, overwhelmingly Najdi in its roots, cast a long shadow over the early history of Islam, dividing the Muslims, distracting their armies from the task of conquering Byzantium, and injecting rancour, suspicion, and bitterness among the very earliest generations of Muslims. Only the most determined, blinkered and irresponsible Najdi sympathiser could ignore this evidence, transmitted so reliably from the pure Salaf, and persist in the delusion that Najd and the misguided, literalistic rigorism which it recurrently produces, is somehow an area favoured by Allah.
And Allah knows best. May He unite the Umma through love for the early Muslims who refused bigotry, and may He preserve us from the trap of Kharijism and those who are attracted to its mindset in our time. Ameen.
In Surah Yunus, Ayah 58, the Qur'an states: "In the bounty of Allah and in His mercy, let them rejoice; that is better than what they accumulate." This emphasizes that true joy comes from Allah's blessings and mercy, which surpass any material wealth.
Similarly, in Surah Al-Anbiya, Ayah 107, the Qur'an declares: "And We have not sent you, [O Muhammad], except as a mercy to the worlds." This verse highlights that the greatest blessing from Allah to humanity is the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, who was sent as a mercy to all creation.
Therefore, given that the Prophet ﷺ embodies Allah's supreme mercy and blessing, and considering that the Qur'an encourages rejoicing in Allah's bounty and mercy, it follows that celebrating the Mawlid of the Prophet ﷺ is a fitting expression of gratitude and joy for this unparalleled divine blessing. May Allah SWT guide you.
@@TheQuran732- It seems you may not have thoroughly reviewed the tafsir of the scholars you mentioned. You often seek proofs from the Quran and Hadith regarding our Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), but when scholars from Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaat present these proofs, you often dismiss them. Tafsir Ibn Kathir, for instance, highlights and emphasizes that the Prophet ﷺ is described as a mercy to the worlds, as indicated in the verse: وَمَآ أَرْسَلْنَـكَ إِلَّا رَحْمَةً لِّلْعَـلَمِينَ (And We have sent you not but as a mercy for the worlds). This verse shows that Muhammad ﷺ was sent as a mercy to all people, and those who accept and appreciate this mercy will find happiness both in this world and the Hereafter. Conversely, those who reject it and turn away will face loss in this life and the next, as emphasized in the verse: أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الَّذِينَ بَدَّلُوا نِعْمَتَ اللَّهِ كُفْرًا وَأَحَلُّوا قَوْمَهُمْ دَارَ الْبَوَارِ (Have you not seen those who have exchanged the blessings of Allah for disbelief, leading their people to the house of destruction, Hell, where they will burn-an evil place to settle in?).
@@TheQuran732- Qur'an states:
قُلْ بِفَضْلِ اللَّهِ وَبِرَحْمَتِهِ فَبِذَلِكَ فَلْيَفْرَحُوا هُوَ خَيْرٌ مِمَّا يَجْمَعُونَ
Translation: Say: "In the bounty of God. And in His Mercy, in that "LET THEM REJOICE" : that is better than the (wealth) they hoard (Surah Yunus, 10:58)
Imam Ibn al-Jawzi (rah) explains 10:58 in his Tafsir:
أن فضل الله: العلم، ورحمته: محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم، رواه الضحاك عن ابن عباس.
Translation: ad-Dhahak narrated from Ibn Abbas (ra) that Bounty mentioned in this verse means Knowledge (i.e of Qur'an and Tawhid) whereas Mercy means Muhammad (Salallaho alaihi wasalam) [Ibn Jawzi Z'ad al Maseer fi Ilm at Tafsir, (4/40)]
Imam Abu Hayyan al Andalusi (Rahimuhullah) also says:
الفضل العلم والرحمة محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم
Translation: Bounty refers to Knowledge whereas Mercy refers to Muhammad (salallaho alaihi wasalam) [Tafsir Al-Bahr al Muheet, (5/171
Imam Jalal uddin Suyuti (Rahimuhullah) says
وأخرج أبو الشيخ عن ابن عباس رضي الله عنهما في الآية قال: فضل الله العلم، ورحمته محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم، قال الله تعالى
{ وما أرسلناك إلا رحمة للعالمين }
[الأنبياء: 107].
Abu Sheikh (rah) narrated from Ibn Abbas (RA) That Bounty of Allah means Knowledge, whereas Mercy means Muhammad (Salallaho alaihi wasalam) Allah Ta'ala said: We have sent thee not but as Mercy to Worlds (Al Anbiya: 107) [As-Suyuti in Dur al Manthur (4/330
Allama Aloosi (rah) explains that even Fadhl (i.e. bounty) refers to Prophet Muhammad (salallaho alaihi wassalam)
وأخرج الخطيب وابن عساكر عنه تفسير الفضل بالنبـي عليه الصلاة والسلام
Narrated by Al Khatib (rah) and Ibn Asakir (rah) that Bounty refers to An-Nabi (Alaih Salatu Wassalam) [Al-Alusi in Ruh al Ma’ani (11/141)]
These ayaat were revealed to our Prophet ﷺ yet we have no evidences of the celebrations we see today. None of the sahaaba celebrated like people do today. A person who lives near me has a flag in his garden and a nalain image on his window. This person was doing giyarvi last month. I asked him what date was our Prophet ﷺ born? He said 12 of Rabi Ul Awwal. I said why does the person for whom you do giyarvi say that our Prophet ﷺ was born on 10 Muharram? I didn’t get an answer but just a taunt that I’m a wahabi
@@TheQuran732- You’ve just acknowledged that Muhammad (SAW) is a profound mercy to mankind, the greatest blessing we could ever receive. Given this, isn’t it fitting for us to celebrate this gift with immense joy and gratitude? It’s surprising to see a lack of understanding regarding the term "mawlid," which simply means "birth." If we can celebrate personal milestones like birthdays or special days, why question the celebration of the Prophet’s birth? It seems rather misguided to question the term "mawlid" when you might not fully understand its meaning while claiming to be knowledgeable. Similarly, if you ask where the Quran mentions celebrating events like Saudi Conference Day or starting a RUclips channel, remember that the Quran doesn’t address every modern practice explicitly. Your personal milestones are celebrated without specific Quranic guidance, so why question the celebration of the Prophet’s birth when he is the biggest blessing to servants like us and we will keep rejoicing the this blessing of allah swt until the end of eternity unlike people like you who acts otherwise and echo the attitude of Iblees, who was discontent and unwilling to honor what was right.
@@TheQuran732- Btw which sunnah does mawlid omete? I mean acc to Sheikh ibn taymiyyah that bidah ometes sunnah.....
Bhagwan ghous pak ki Jai 🕉️ Har Har Maha ghous Dev ki Jai 🕉️ Om ghous namo namaha 🕉️
THE MAWLID OF OUR BELOVED FINAL PROPHET & MESSENGER MUHAMMAD ﷺ IS 100% BID’AH. ALLAH ﷻ IS MY WITNESS I SPOKE OUT AGAINST SUCH A INNOVATION ☝🏼 STOP THIS AT ONCE. MAY ALLAH HELP US & GUIDE US 🤲🏼
Refute the fatwa ya najdi
@@grr.yh6ylu373stop the name calling. It is such a way of ignorants. When Allah advised Mosa to remind tbe Pharoah he said to do so in gentle and wise way, so he may incline to the truth.
You have no sense what so ever. Antagonist and ignorant at the same time is a bad combination. So remain silent.
Thank You
@shahidhussain9176you’ve been refuted good luck next time.
Its not bad we have evidences supporting mawlid and the sheikh shared the book
Prophet salalahu Aley wasalam and his swahaba and the four imams were wahabis because they didn't celebrate maulid or wahabis follow prophet and swahaba and four imamas they are wahabis.?
may allah subhana wa taala bless him
Answer me simple question: Did Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings upon him, celebrated his birthday?
As salaamu alykum. MashaAllah. Celebrating the birth of our beloved Nani (S.A.W) is not a bad Biddah (innovation of the Deenof Islam). Even if we don’t know exactly which day he was born we always celebrate the coming of the light with great delight. It’s your choice how you want to show love for the Nabi S.A.W but we only worship Allah alone. We love and send salutations for the sake of Allah. If you have a problem with the Mawlid then how do you express your love for the Nabi S.A.W? I believe there are different ways according to the different cultures in different parts of the world.
Just because the Nabi S.A.W or Sahaaabah didn’t do something doesn’t mean it’s forbidden. An example of a good biddah is when saydnah Umar (R.A) said praying taraweegh salaah in a group together in Ramadan is a good biddah. A bad biddah is something introduced to the Deen that has no benefit or is harmful and causes disunity which is clear to see that it will lead to the fire. A good biddah is something that promotes love for the sake of Allah and should bring people closer to Allah and Islam. It could be a good form of dawah inshaAllah.
Allah says in the Quran that He and the angels sends salutations continuously on the Nabi Mohammad S.A.W - Peace be upon him, and Allah commands us in the same ayat that the believers should do the same. Allah knows best, may Allah guide us Muslims and keep us on the straight path, Aameen.
This talk is only about Fatawa, but he doesn't state the hadith. Be open and take few minutes more to discuss about the ahadith.
You mentioned imam Bukhari did he do mawlid it was unknown to them, Ahmad, Mālik, shafi and the rest of salaf
Never celebrated this
Some najdi fellas dont understand that if mawlid was directly celebrated by the sahaba, it wouldve been a sunnah. Where do we say that its sunnah? We say its mustahab. Then why are you compelled to ask for daleel for it being sunnah, like did the messenger sallallahu alaihi wasallam do it, or the sahaba do it, etc.? For being mustahab, the hadith of ameere muawiya radiyallahu taala anhu is enough, that the sahaba gathered to thank allah subhanahu wa taala for sending the best of creations sallallahu alaihi wasallam among them.
Overall, they have no evidence for it being impermissible. Now some may copypaste the hadith of bidah al dwalalah but they won't explain what is bidah al dwalalah acc to sunnah. And why syeduna umar radiyallahu taala anhu said, haadha nèmatul bidàh?
Even a jahil knows the two types of bid’ah. Shar’i, and linguistic. In linguistic, yes there is good and bad bid’ah. In shar’i, no. There is only bid’ah dalalah. Every bid’ah is dalalah. You guys literally cry when i quote wat the prophet said ﷺ
EVERY. BID’AH. IS. DALALAH!!!!!
Basicly he agrees that the prophet nor the sahaba did any of this stuff but he argues that you are not misguided and a innovator if you do these rituals.
And then his proof is a quote in a book from a sheikh
Indeed Mawlid is proven from Qur'an and Sunnah
@@mdvizarath8853
Where's the proof
MEWULID MUBARAK EVERYONE SALLALLAHU ALYHI WASLEM 💚💚💚💚
Is the Quran and sunnah not enough for people
Are we christian to celebrate the mawlid...?
Sir,that is a serious problem with the Arab religion.There are Molvis, Scholars,intellectuals at different times and different places saying/ writing/interpreting one issue in contrarian ways.And that creates very serious problems in monotheistic concept.
Nah. Those who say it's not permissible have zero evidence to say so. We have enough for it being permissible. Before the rise of the Wahabi sect, there was no conflict. Even if it was, it wasn't of a level that ya call your brother a polytheist
MASHA ALLAH ﷻ ❤
Give us proof of the first three generations practicing the deviant sect practice.
MAWLID IS BIDA'AH
BIDA'AH means that you're doing something which the prophet did not do. That means you are claiming that Muhammad has left this deen incomplete, that you're doing something good which the prophet did not do or the companions.
Wallahi hadha suuul amalu min ashaytan.
MAWLID IS NOT BIDA'AH, there are evidences/daleel from our Deen but you people hate the birth of Rasoolullah.
And your reason is stupid, go ride a camel instead of a car bc that's also bidaa.
Don't read the Quran on your phone bc that's bidaa.
Don't pray in a masjid where there's a carpet, fan, telescreen or even a clock bc that's also bidaa.
And if you attended a birthday gathering/ celebration for your family member, mother, wife or son you also did a bidaa.
Someone involved in bidaa cannot accuse others of bida unless his imam is Abdul Wahhab Najdi.
So, ask Allah for Aql before denouncing those who honour the coming of the Prophet Muhammad (Sallahu alaihi wasalam) in this world, while people like you do nothing!
This ahlalul biddah did not follow sunnah or daleel they follow their desires
why do you have problem with christmas??
Cuz how they celebrate it
Imam As Suyuti amd Imam ibn Hajar are our great scholars but they make mistake just like everyone does.Doesnt mean wr habve to follow their mistakes
Doesn't mean that we have to take your fatwa of bidah and say that imam Ibn Hajar, imam suyuti, imam Ibn Hajar makki, Shah Abdul haq muhaddith dehlawi, aal of them made mistakes
In the region of azad Kashmir our grandparents had never heard of mawlid until Very recently. People use to have "hatama nabuwat" during this month. Someone bought this new mawlid discos to our region.
@@GHOST-r5k as were yours
How did mawlid celebrations skip the shahaaba and best 3 generations?
Bring imam Ibn hajar al asqalani, or imam as-suyuti, or any other infront of me saying that mawlid is okay and good. I don’t care. I’d rather follow the prophet ﷺ. With all respect to the great ‘ulama, they can all sit down and be silent like good boys when they contradict the prophet ﷺ.
scholar bashing/propping and name calling is all this is. It is literally said in the video by Assuyuti that it is a 'good' biddah, not a doing of the Sahaba or any of the Salaf of the Ummah. The only disagreement is that RasulAllah SAW did not make a distinction when he said all Biddah is in hellfire, why do the scholars after him do this. The hadith this brother mentions he does not quote so the entire argument is that a scholar you quote from said it's a good biddah so it is okay to do.
He did not bring 1 hadith or athar of a sahabhi that mawlid was encouraged by our beloved prophet Mohammed saw.
It is strange he didn't read fatwa in his own language and top of that he didn't mention how it is permissible! In India, people celebrate mowlid like idol worshiper celebrate by coming on street with DJ and statues of doms. Christians celebrate their saints and Jesus birthday, and prophet ﷺ has prohibited us to follow their ways.
Breanne Forks
Don't do mawlud it's bidiah
Where does it Say?
And u are animal
Stop celebrating...stop your excuses for a clear Bid'ah...nobody even knows the actual birth date of Rasul Allah saw (why do you think this knowledge was withheld from us by Allah Jallahu'ala)... think and save yourselves...good practice... Next you will say climbing on top of a coconut tree and sitting like a monkey screaming out Da'wah is good practice... wake up...we have the examples of the 3 best generations... don't add more
the sahabahs didnt do this so you ahlul bidahs think you love the prophet pbuh more than them?😂😂
Biddat
Biddat
Biddat and 100% biddat
Why the Deobandi and Barelwi are so quiet in showing solidarity with Palestinians? Sitting on the fence or some other reason?
There is a National Rally this weekend in Liverpool at the Labour Party conference. 🍉
The Wali Watches Sexual Relations of his Students is Endorsed by Ahmed Raza Khan. Please someone Refute the Explicit Story as its too much for Sufies 😊..
In "Al Malfuz Ash Sharif v 2 pg 232. Ahmad Raza Khan Said as Quotes
Shaykh Ahmad Ibn Mubarak Saljamasai had two wives. His Murshid one spoke to him about this and that dialogue was as follows:
Murshid:- Last Night to spent the night 🌙 with one wife while the other was awake. This is not a correct thing to do.
Murid:- O Master! the other wife was asleep.
Murshid:- No, she was not asleep.
Murid:- Oh Master! how do you know that my second wife was not asleep.
Murshid:- Do you have a spare bed in the room where your second wife sleeps.
Murid:- Yes my Master.
Murshid:- I Was Present on that spare bed 😅. Botched Aqeedah made in Hindustan by Barailwies.
Thats why Fairy Tale Barailwisms foundations are baseless Lies and a million miles from the Actual Sunnah. May Allaah Exalted and Most High Guide us all.
I wonder why the 4 Khulafah Rashideen & 4 Imams never did it or encouraged it.🤷🏿♂️🤔
Also wonder why they never forbade coming generations from celebrating it!
@@shariffali7780 bro they weren't fortune tellers!😈🤷🏿♂️
@@mdkhan3928 ok so this means the prophet never forbade it, tha sahabas likewise, the 4 imams likewise, the grand maulid is introduced in the 6th century by king Mudhaffar and ulama of his time acknowledged it! Fast forward to 12th century enter the era of wahabbism, maulid now becomes the worst innovation! Bro who's fooling who!
The Sahaba DID recite poetry in his, saw, praise. They did sing good words. You have nothing but petrodollars and USA to protect you.
@@n.a.1397 Any irrelevant evidence to justify your innovations.😈🤦🏿♂️🤷🏿♂️
Biggest refutation for barelvi asrar: the shiites invented it, the ashari salahudin banned it.
Both of those are false misconceptions. The Fatimids celebrated the birthday of Imam Ali NOT of Prophet Muhammad.
As for Salahuddin, he instituted it's celebration not banned it !
@@baselhakim2080 The books of history say otherwise!
@@AbdullahAburob24 no they don't, the only thing that says otherwise is wahhabi liars who speak to people like you that don't actually read those books
Does lying comes by default with wahabism?
@@AbdullahAburob24
You haven't actually read the books, you just listened to wahhabi liars and were gullibly enough to believe them
Why didn't he read the text more than he named these scholars again and again 😂
No "good bidah""
Ya Allah help them. What about the Quran.. did we have books during the time of the sahabahs or our Prophet... Books in general???
Prayer rugs? They prayed on animal skins.. Nothing about birthdays, books, Prayer rugs adds to the religious aspect of Islam. Yall be out there having full blown baby showers, weddings, big halls for walimahs.. extravagance at its best..
A bidah is a bidah. There's no good bidah. Stop justifying something by calling others who do not agree with this ignominy wahabis. You are the one who is leading others astray.
there are endless good bidahs. like using microphones in masjids. salafis use to call people kuffar for this
@@louisdeniau8571 know how to make the distinction. Celebration of birthdays is never a good bidah even of our prophets (pnut). Why don't you celebrate Christmas???
Al_Suyuti gives you your religion? He affirms the Fatimid “parade” and you are ok with it? Something about Muslims who KNOW they are going to Paradise always rubs me the wrong way. AlSuyuti,,, not AbuBakr, not Omar, not Uthman, not Ali RAnhum? Weird…
Top 10 most emotional arguments
Imām Al-Hafidh ibn Hajar 773H
Imām Jalaalud Dīn As-Suyooti 849H
These scholars are not the scholars of old, they are very recent. Even if they did permit this then we don't take their word.
Is there a proof ? Why didn't you read it?
Why didn't you read their Fatawi?
This video has absolutely no benefit.
Edit: I respect these scholars and look up to them, I also acknowledge that all scholars err expect our noble Messenger Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم.
It is you Sufi Mubtadi'ah who do not respect the sahabah, by erroneously saying they did not love the messenger by performing this Baatil Mawlid that has no proof whatsoever.
First say 'IMAM' SUYUTI AND 'IMAM' IBN HAJAR
Yeah so you have more knowledge than imam jalaluddin suyuti and Imam Hafidh ibn hajar , I know you didn't claim to knowledgeable person than them, but your words shows that you are more knowledgeable than them, not only them, but there other scholars IMAM Shawkani, IMAM Ibn Kathir are more older Great Scholars and from Salaf u saliheen !!
@@Shk.SaadAhmed Ya jahil Imam Suyuti Rahimahullah is a great scholar but he also erred in some things he is not A DALEEL. THE DALEEL is the Quran and the Sunnah and how the Salaf understood it. Name me one from the Salaf that celebrated Mawlid. You won't find any
My brother, mawlid is not fardh.
@@engineer8363 its bidah wdym fardh??
@@engineer8363 Are you saying that to me? I'm confused, what are you talking about?
Imam Suyuti is not from the Salaf first three generations. So even if he approves the Mawlid it has no value.
Hasanul basari(r)is from the salaf and from first 3 generation ,is n't he?..
Do you know What he said.. he said that if he had gold equal to the Jabal Uhud ,he would have gave that completely for the mowlid...
Ur problem is not evidence.....
Ur problem is with rasool(s).....
So what matters is only the 1st 3 gens right?
Then why u guys s up to MIAW?
Najdi, the blessed prophet, celebrated his own birthday.
The shaba were celebrating it by fasting every Monday. For those of us who are weak to fast every Monday and make gratitude on his birth, the Ulema have set us yearly memorial day.
ibn abdul wahab is not from the salad
Allah bless asrar Rashid
Even the word *Mawlid* doesn’t sound Islamic, it sounds more like a type of *barfi* from the corner mithai shop!
Meelad Un Nabi 03 quran Proof No. 2
Qur'an states
ذَلِكَ فَضْلُ اللَّهِ يُؤْتِيهِ مَنْ يَشَاءُ وَاللَّهُ ذُو الْفَضْلِ الْعَظِيمِ
That is the bounty of Allah; which He giveth unto whom He will. Allah is of Infinite Bounty (وَاللَّهُ ذُو الْفَضْلِ الْعَظِيمِ )
(62:4)
Hadrat Abdullah Ibn Abbas (Radhi Allah) explains “Allah is of infinite bounty” as:
(Allah is of infinite bounty) by bestowing Islam and prophethood upon Muhammad (pbuh); and it is also said this means: by bestowing Islam upon the believers; and it is also said this means: by sending the Messenger and Scripture to His created beings. [Tanwir al Miqbas Min Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
Without Mawlid function the bareli speakers income ends.
We don't see barelvi speakers hosting functions at their own costs yet they preach it's fard to do so.
😂😂😂😂😂
Is this dude Shia?
💯 bidah dalala
MAWLID IS BIDA’ END OF DISCUSSION!
Fear Allah there is no such things as wahhabis, if you mean the people warning for shirk like ALL the prophets used to do then yes they are on the right path
We have major difference with your aqeeda of tawassul and istigashah of Waliullah or Rasulullah.We consider it as a major shirk.Mawlid and other biddah of your are minor issues.
❤❤❤❤
Everyone is entitled to they're own opinion... good innovation and bad innovation is still innovation and we was told by the prophet him self not to inovate. Im not very clued up on these things maybe im wrong but i think if it was something we should do then surely our prophet would have made it clear for us to do this practice.. but we should not separate and segregate and try to stick together what ever your beliefs are may allah guide us all, lets all agree to to disagree and eat some halwa
Whabism is wrong that doesn't mean Brelvism and sufism is right.
@EMAMstudent-g8n astaghuallah
@EMAMstudent-g8n So why doesn't your so called Engineer Mirza sit a Debate to make people see the truth.
Fr
@@simplicity6302So why don't your so called ulema answer his questions or refute him with logic???
Some of the languages used here is disgusting as Muslims. May Allah forgive us.
Ofcourse it’s all khalaf😂
Daed 2 all wahabies
👍🏾
Anyone who who uses the term wahabi is not to be trusted because of their ignorance 🤦🏻♂️ Abdul-wahab only quoted the Qur'aan and sunnah in his book.
@@Hose-A So do Qadyanis and so do Shia. So did Khawarij, Mutazillah, Jabbariya, Qadriyya and other deviant sects.
@@utgdomeyou’re really comparing kaafirs to a man who quoted undeniably authentic hadith in his works? And used nothing but the Quran and verified sunnah to prove his aqeedah and manhaj? You are very lost subhanAllah.
If the mawlid is a bid’ah, good or not, (even though correctly I believe all bid’aat are misguidances as stated in numerous sahih hadith), that means it was innovated after the time of The Prophet ﷺ, however none of the sahabah, or any of the salaf at all celebrated it. So am I now a wahhabi for rejecting anything that those 3 golden generations did not do?
@utgdome key word, "only". You will be held responsible for misguiding the masses insha'Allah.
Labelling people who refuses mawalid as wahabis is poor way to win the argument. It is like you labelling the sahabas who didn't celebrate it to as Wahhabi
Don't listen to this. IT"S BID"A 100%, PERIOD. The Sahaabas (RA) were guaranteed Jannah while still living, how can they be wrong and then you believe someone else? Don't spread lies.
Maulid basically is the life history of our prophet (saw). Why all this unnecessary hullabaloo that it shouldn't be done is the works of enemies of lslam who created the wahabbi movement to be their loudmouths! Fox in a sheepskin!
Just too bad.. it's impossible to make them understand...
No one is from the Salaf, Khalaf's are not hujjah even in the good innovation because Abdullah ibn Umar (RA) said "Every innovation is misguidance, even if they do with the good intention"
If unsure on any ISSUE of DEEN, especially our BELOVED MAULOOD SHAREEF ... Follow the teaching and guidance of our BELOVED AWLIYA IKRAAM R. A..... THE BELOVED MAULOOD HAS ALWAYS BEEN PERMISSIBLE as it's full of sawaabs ❤❤🌹🌹🌹🤲🤲🤲
Misguiding the Muslim ummah may allah guide you mawlid is a very Pakistani thing I am British pakistani and the Pakistani people at most are very misguided by people like this mawlid is not permissible end of story.
Mubtadi
They accept the fact its a bidah.
They claim they love the prophet more than the sahaba and they claim is to tantamount to saying that they understood the life of the prophet better than the sahaba.once a bida wala always a bidah wala
😂 okay explain tala al badru alayna
Shaitan's
Who’s going to tell him 😂
Bunch of nonsensical hot air and no actual point made as usual from these people. Barellwism/Sufis/Shia will never ever be able to prove that the greatest generations who lived with and loved the Prophet salAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam more than we ever could, ever took his birth date as a day of celebration during his life or after it. They are forced to resort to fanciful arguments, twisting texts and silly analogies and the writings of those who came hundreds of years later after the Shia innovated this practice. THIS is the real disease we have to deal with, not the silly straw man in this video.
Mawlid is wrong
May Allah guide you.
@@alihyderiqbal3921 start with yourself
Any proof
Who says??? Where is you proof
@@TTS526 celebrate Christmas aswell then. Moron
Another sponger of the system.go and became a man and make jamuh kashmir azan like the pasthuns fought to make azan kashmir azad