Eco India: Nashik's grape growers preventing chemical overuse for their share in the export market

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 дек 2024

Комментарии • 30

  • @divyanshubhushan8626
    @divyanshubhushan8626 3 года назад +11

    I lived in Nashik for 3 years. Went to grape orchard and saw them dipping each of it into chemicals. I mean it’s so sad eating chemicals and thinking about the benefits of the fruit you consumed. Hope more farmers take up organic farming.

  • @aliosman2459
    @aliosman2459 3 года назад +4

    India fruits are the best quality in the world especially mangoes very sweet and juicy thus India is known as world 1 producer of mangoes

  • @hajasm5828
    @hajasm5828 3 года назад +2

    Great Happy to see commited people for
    Quality produce from India 🇮🇳👏

  • @suyashgupta87
    @suyashgupta87 3 года назад +3

    Yet another great mini docu from scroll! Keep it up guys!

  • @rohitpandey5699
    @rohitpandey5699 3 года назад +1

    Thanks for the valuable knowledge

  • @sanketshinde413
    @sanketshinde413 3 года назад +2

    Great work .👏👏

  • @vthilton
    @vthilton 3 года назад

    Sharing, Justice and Peace for All.

  • @mukulsingh508
    @mukulsingh508 3 года назад +2

    I wait every Sunday for this bliss 😍

  • @Angurparvar
    @Angurparvar 3 месяца назад

    I need cuttings arra 33,34,32,35, 36, do you have???

  • @angelmathew
    @angelmathew 2 года назад

    What is the best time to place order ?

  • @saiteja-rc4dx
    @saiteja-rc4dx 8 месяцев назад

    How do i contact you to learn this techniques of less chemical farming

  • @everythingtechpro007
    @everythingtechpro007 3 года назад +3

    So we export all the non toxic food to foreign land and we consome and toxic overused chemical ones.

  • @jonaliali402
    @jonaliali402 3 года назад

    Outstanding

  • @arungera4041
    @arungera4041 3 года назад +1

    Thanks for sharing
    And helping farmers
    Please do share health practices

  • @rahuljamatia1279
    @rahuljamatia1279 3 года назад +1

    I felt relaxed....💐

  • @bollinamohansatyabalakrish2076
    @bollinamohansatyabalakrish2076 3 года назад +3

    This seems if the produce has lot of crap leave it to indians they will eat for other countries they should be clean and good

  • @hajasm5828
    @hajasm5828 3 года назад

    I suggest they teach the methodology to other growers also

    • @maazkalim
      @maazkalim 3 года назад

      Opportunity costs..°

  • @helpme2862
    @helpme2862 2 года назад

    It's kinda sad that we'll probably never get to eat these good quality grapes even though we live in India. All the good stuff is being exported and the rest is being left for us

  • @nafismubashir2479
    @nafismubashir2479 3 года назад

    arid?

  • @sharathahuja8919
    @sharathahuja8919 3 года назад +5

    How come grapes exported have to meet very stringent FDA standards, while the Aam Aadmi in India gets whatever is grown. Double Standards as always.

    • @sanketdawange303
      @sanketdawange303 2 года назад +1

      True. However, if the local market is willing to pay the premium price for the same grapes, we as farmers are more than happy to provide the quality produce ❤️. We are trying our best to divert our market preference locally, but the quality of our produce demands price premium.

  • @krantiohal9244
    @krantiohal9244 3 года назад

    Rubi roman yacha bij kivha roop kute bhelet

  • @RajeshD2804
    @RajeshD2804 3 года назад +1

    Wonder why they are not at Singhu border protesting Modi's farm laws??🤔

    • @mangeshchalan8786
      @mangeshchalan8786 3 года назад +1

      Because they are doing what modi made the bill for! Direct selling! To whoever you want!

    • @maazkalim
      @maazkalim 3 года назад

      Because one size doesn't fit all..
      And quite bruising to all of the non-farmers who lo-lo-love those laws, the release of this report is just-another substantiation that Scroll® is not part of any "anti-national" whatchamacallit and the Messiah's henchpeople singling-it-out alongwith few others is just-another stamping of their despotism: Obviously the ideal for World's Largest Anocracy.
      Now back to your derivative topic: As I said, "one-size-doesn't-fit-all" so unlike the farm-laws would hope to make a reality, these farmers don't have to face ever-more-unrestrained Big Corporate with their only competition being a State-administered, regulated-market - even though it's the State which paradoxically gave unmatched upper-hand to all of the Big Corporate.

    • @lolvivo8783
      @lolvivo8783 3 года назад

      @@maazkalim Your first para was a comment on political policy and not much to do with farm laws, anocracy or not, and hence was irrelevent.
      Big corporate is everywhere and nobody can be assured a 100 percent market for their goods in this globalised world including MSME or any other big industry. One has to study the market and plan. The farmers shown here too aren't guaranteed a purchase but they chose risk weighing the reward and as stats show only 12 percent do qualify.
      The government is not forever obliged to purchase grains when their storage facilities are full. The farmers should grow that which is needed in market and they will get good earnings. Though this may take some time to get trained, its the best way forward.

    • @maazkalim
      @maazkalim 3 года назад

      First of all, Thanks a ton for your civil - if not polite, reply.
      Sincerely. It's so rare, that it's always refreshing when somebody talks in this way not just in any nook-&-corner of "RUclips® comments[-section]", but across the 'pop-Interweb' multiverse, "@@lolvivo8783".
      Yes, I see your point. I heard you.
      HOWEVER.. I disagree with your fundamental proposition THAT "Big Corporate" is everywhere. Need I expand on that? Since a-gain.. That might obligate me to go places where you may find that it's a “commentary on political policy” or something, in other words: No continuation of firmly burying one's hand in the sand. *The bottom-line:* Your assertion that Big Corporate has tapped into every single industry and/or line-of-trade there is and are being born, is false.
      As for the “globalised world”: Funny YOU say that.. Because it's exactly those kind of folks who go into such poetry of “globalised world” and all over economic-affairs that they also turn-out to be believers in anti-Globalist conspiracy-theories like "the NWO", "Illuminati" and what-not. Need I spell-out the label, even? And puh-lease.. In the jurisdiction where far too many of the populace goes hungry each day and night, this is obviously an incompetence that their godowns are “full”. So yes.. I do concur with you on quite the ancient State incompetence virtually everywhere. Since as somebody not just with indirect familial-agriculture background but also the one who still manages to follow the news, the abominable storage-conditions of storage and sheer wastage of the commodities is a recurring feature of [sociopolitical ]news-stories since past few decades before the existence of APMC because the buzz. However.. Your propagation of so-called "public choice theory" that the Big Corporate must be allowed to have untied-leash, like a Wild Wild West of Free Market Capitalism is, and I assert: Only predicated to have worse ramifications for not just farmers themselves, but even consumers. You sound like if there's no pre-existing place at the table for Big Corporate when that hasn't been the case. Untrue. And yes: Your assertion that all of the protesting-farmers are somehow growing unpopular crops and lentils and that's why require _their turf_ protected based on "demand _vs_ supply" is another deplorable assumption on your part. Lemme put it this way.. All industries are just not equal. Without going academic, whether it fits in your simplistic, theoretical worldview of binaries or not - is perfectly-irrelevant. So given how pertinent agriculture is to the very survival of Human Civilization, I say why not keep the door for both of the APMCs and the Corporates open?! Market-forces, right? If the Capitalists indeed do bring a lot more value to the table, then I'm sure the sellers would prefer them over the State-run APMCs? It's the basics of how incentives work.

    • @aleenaprasannan2146
      @aleenaprasannan2146 3 года назад

      @@mangeshchalan8786 Didn't Modi say that that Bill is needed for farmers to sell to anyone they want? Then how are these folks able to sell to whoever they like even without the Bill? If they can sell before the Bill is implemented, then what exactly is this new bill for? Does this mean that Modi was lying when he said farmers can sell to anyone they like without his bill?