except this explanation doesn't actually apply to ChatGPT or most modern AI models these days, those rely on a lot of complicated math stuff and not just natural selection although the rebranding was a power play it is likely just going to misinform people
5:48 Lately almost every “are you a robot” quiz I’ve gotten had been for either crosswalks or stop signs, I didn’t even think about it until I watched this!
The problem is, you can still get it wrong. So what happens if you get it wrong? Does it even matter? The point of these is to check that you're human, but if it always accepts what you give it, then that isn't achieved. However, if it already knows which ones are correct, then it also isn't learning anything. So what's the deal?
@@aurias42 The same test is given to a lot of people. It's looking for consensus among the human test takers. If you click mostly tiles that the other humans have also clicked, it figures you're human. If you click random tiles, it says you are a robot. It it's unsure, or if the image is too new to know what humans typically do, it gives you multiple images before rendering a verdict. You've probably seen that happen. Each time another human takes the test for a given image, it gets more and more confident in which tiles are, say, crosswalks, and which are not. Once it's confident enough, that image goes out of circulation as is used to train self-driving cars and a new one cycles in.
@@greatestbear The test measures things like how your cursor moves and etc so it can tell you're human regardless of your test score. If you intentionally pick random pics, I'm sure the algorithm will consider you a human but disregard your answers.
@@thejackbox yeah it's quite clickbaity when I saw this in my recommended, I was thinking "oh was ChatGPT a thing 5 years ago but just not as big as it is now?", not "oh I wonder how algorithms like ChatGPT work", mainly because I already generally know how algorithms work.
They learnt how to play on human emotions just like actual people. I wonder if this starts a philosophical question as to whether it is ethical to dismiss the video in the chamce that they are truly sentient.
So machine learning is just mutation+natural selection on an absolutely enormous scale, then! Watching this reminded me of how bacteria gain resistance to a drug.
He says each bot is different. "At first, the builder bot connects the wires in the bots' brains almost at random". This is analogous to mutation. As the tests go on, the good bots are optimized by creating and testing slight permutations of the most successful ones. Just like a mutation.
TierZoo Oh, hello there. I would say that biological evolution is also on an enormous (in fact, global) scale, but the evolution of bots is accelerated extremely due to the computing power of machines, and since there are no interruptions in the proccess like slow breeding and development. And the selection of bots is much more intense. I think Earth would be left barren if less than 0.01% of organisms survived long enough to breed.
ChatGPT *does* have a teacher bot, but they didn't kill all of his classmates unlike in this video. Instead teacher bot was punished or rewarded based on how well it guessed what output from ChatGPT we humans would prefer. Then it would punish or reward ChatGPT based on what teacher bot *thinks* we want, rinse and repeat till we got modern ChatGPT and Bing...
I think... In order for this to work, they'd have to be testing a large number of people simultaneously, then assuming that the average was correct? Meaning, the way to get around these "are you human" tests is to have a million bots surge across the internet. The first time any bot sees a picture, it picks a random answer and then saves both the picture and the answer to a shared database. Then, when any bot comes across the same picture, it gives the same answer. Or, I guess, they could have bad bots (or cheap foreign labor) pre-selecting "correct" answers, then using the internet to refine those answers.
@@neilemminger8628 I think the way it works is, a couple of the photos are known stop signs (from earlier tests or by developer input) and then they throw in a few pictures they're not sure about. If you get the first two right, they know you're a human, and so they trust your answer on the last one. But then I'm sure it's averaged out after thousands of trials, since some real humans are like half blind and probably fail these Captchas.
@@neilemminger8628 This used to be how captchas worked back when it showed you two words. One was pre-generated as the actual test, the other was a scan from a book or something that was being digitized. If you got the test word correct, it would take your other one regardless of how correct it was. Once it had enough people in agreement, it would confirm that the scan was of whatever word people were saying it was. Of course, 4-chan found this out somehow and did what they do, to incorrectly insert a number of slurs into these digital versions of books.
This is simplified perfectly. Not too much information so that people don’t understand, but not too little that it makes my profession seem like an overpaid typer.
Isn't it wrong, though? What he described is evolutionary computation, but, as far as I'm aware, the vast majority of ML algorithms aren't that. To my knowledge, neural networks, naive Bayes, and random forest are far more widespread.
@@maxkho00 there's a footnote video explaining the reasoning behind selecting this type of algorithm and providing an explanation for the more widespread ones.
@@shadowlord0162 WHOEVER IS COMPLETING THE TEST WINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!11!!!! ULTIMATE BOTTALITY!!!!!!!! *CRASH OCURRED WITH THE BUILDER BOT, THE ALGORITHM IS LOOOOOOOOOOOOST*
Last time I watched it, I saw another tech-looking thumbnail, out of ordinary. The title is How AIs, like GPT-4, learns (I could be incorrect tho) And before that I also saw the video years ago but it’s probably something like “How Machine Learns” Damn CGP Grey, you want us to watch the old video. You should have a medal from taking advantage of YT algorithm.
I am going, to be honest. This video is what got me interested in machine learning for the past year. I've learned so much stuff since watching this and I just want to thank you, CGP Grey. In fact, this video basically picked my career choice for me. It's so amazingly made, and I just want to thank you for making this.
If you're more interested in the practicality of it rather than the analytical coding side of it, I'd look into Code Bullet, he has some really fun-to-watch machine learning videos playing popular internet / retro games like Flappy Bird, Snake, and hill-climb racing. Pretty cool to watch! I've been obsessed with the content of it all for years but I'm not much of a programmer nor do I have the motivation to go learning programming just to get it all sorted, but that doesn't mean it's not interesting! link to Code Bullet's channel: ruclips.net/channel/UC0e3QhIYukixgh5VVpKHH9Q Bonus: Tom Seven's AI playing old NES games is also way fun to watch! link to that here ---> ruclips.net/video/xOCurBYI_gY/видео.html
yeah smart move honestly, if you can take advantage of the new massive interest in this topic with a simple renaming of a video that talks about it why would you not id do it
This video came out when I was 13 and I remember it coming out and being so exited for a new cgp gray video, and now I feel the same and continue to go back and watch all these older videos as if they just came out yesterday. Keep up the great content!
So... the next time you get recommended a CGP Grey video and you either dont watch it all the way through or dont even click on it, a poor learning bot dies. So sad
but, if you write a scathing criticism in posts or rate it poorly, and even recommend others not watch the videos, you are still feeding the bots. Maybe we should think of learning bots as "undead", and they're feeding on BRAINZ!
@@squirlmy hmmm...... **goes to Algo's Rithms's Bots store** **buys two pounds of "scathing criticism"** **walks out of store** **an army of algorithm bots beat me senseless** **steals my packs** **munchs on "scathing criticism mindlessly**
"Hey, if you have an infinite amount of monkeys banging on keyboards, eventually one of them will produce Shakespeare" Computer Programmers: "Hmmmmmm..."
If you simply eliminate the ones writing the things least like Shakespeare, regularly, then you might not get a work of Shakespeare, but you'll get something close.
Liked. Commenting now. Already subscribed. Have just belled. I'm setting up a twitter account as we speak. And will make sure all your podcasts play on an endless loop in my hallroom, 24/7. Bot master must be appeased.
There is nothing inherently wrong with teaching it. I'm not religious but I studied all Abrahamic religions in school. Teaching what creationism is just a valid as teaching capitalism, communism, math or biology. It expands the mind and understanding, especially when creationism is something that exists in our culture and environment, the fact you don't like it doesn't make it go away. Now teaching it is an alternative, unquestionable, without critique or as absolute truth then we start having issues.
A note: the method of training bots here does work, and is used in many cases, particularly when you're training bots say to play games, for which the test is somewhat expensive to make. For bots that do say classification, a somewhat different method is used, that's called "gradient descent". It's similar to the evolution (random change and test) shown here with a specific insight: if you make a small change, and the bot improves, then it stands to reason you should do more of that change, or do that change multiple times. Gradient descent tests the kinds of changes that improve the bots, and then does more of the change that works best (it can also be understood as the 'direction of most improvement', which is by definition the gradient, hence "gradient descent"). This extra insight makes improvement significantly faster.
The only reason why we aren’t a super society is because I always choose conflicting things on RUclips and Netflix, and intentionally fail those picture tests to slow down progress
If you're not getting anything out of school, then the problem lies with you. Maybe you should put in more effort, smartass. You're not there just to waste time.
CGP Grey has a video on how to be unhappy. In that video an 'allroom' is defined as a single room that meets all of your needs so you never need to move from it.
@@andrewaftontheandroidhedge2780 One of the most popular video's is "10 hours of nothing". Ten hours of silent black screen. I have it open to prevent my work pc from going to screensaver.
We are essentially seeing the process of *millions* of years of human evolution progress over the course of a single lifetime. It constantly blows my mind. What a time to be alive.
@@kaushallsenthilnathan4175 Born in time for gene therapy, maybe even born in time for cybernetic prosthesis. Machine learning and AI could boost scientific progress exponentially, extreme concepts such as immortality may be seen within our lifetime. Assuming we don't destroy ourselves first, of course.
Yep, from flesh to culture & language to tech, to AI. We're in the end game. It'll be wonderful or horrible even within the lifetimes of some boomers and certainly X'ers, to say nothing of Gen X's kids who aren't even kids anymore.
It's interesting to think of this "build, test, slaughter, repeat" process as simulated evolution. Random mutations eventually prove useful and survive natural (or in this case, artificial) selection, better adapting the species (program) to its task, whether that be survival or telling bees from 3's. We're basically killing nature at the moment (unfortunately, as we depend on that nature for our continued survival).... Maybe the bots will one day kill us
It's very likely that the specific algorithm grey is talking about here is the "genetic algorithms" genre of neural network teaching there are other types of neural network teaching which is more akin to crinkling a piece of paper veeeeery specifically, throwing a ball at it, and seeing the lowest point the ball falls to, tweaking the crinkling of the paper to get the ball as low as possible
You should listen to Hello Internet, just like he says at the end. He's often very emotional there. So listen to Hello Internet. Listen. Feed the algorithm.
Yeah, but you have 1000 monkeys, let them type, kill the 999 worst of them and make 999 almost perfect, just slightly altered copies of the best one, and repeat.
You take a million monkeys, have each of them type out a string equal in length to the entire works of Shakespeare, figure out which one came the closest, kill the rest, clone the remaining one with minor random alterations in its string-production method, rinse and repeat. It's a much faster way of getting Shakespeare's entire works, if that's all you want.
Videos like this are important, because every time I bring up superintelligent AI, there's some people that are still not convinced that a programmer can make a machine that's smarter than she is. Hopefully more people will come to understand that the cutting edge of AI isn't about telling bots how to solve problems, it's about telling bots how to LEARN to solve problems, with the solutions that the bots come up with possibly being completely beyond what a human is capable of understanding or imagining. Sure, maybe you could take apart your AI bot afterwards to figure out how it solved the problem - but there's never going to be enough manpower to track in a reasonable time what all these bots are doing.
Matt Roszak The current main fields of machine learning are just that. 1.Creating better learning methods. (Creating better tests for bots) 2.Creating better learning algorithms. (Using non-random techniques for the bot maker) 3.Creating methods to understand what the bots learned.
The bots are what give CGP his power. They're an energy field created by all living things. They surround us. They penetrate us. They bind the galaxy together.
@@urielantoniobarcelosavenda780 no I searched hexagon are the bestagons cause someone commented that on why are there only 7 days in week which I searched on my own.... I'm glad I don't rely on recommendations so much...
@@GnosticLucifer Dude, you're not immune to algoritm xD It doesn't matter if you don't rely on recommendations. Everything you do or see here is going to be used on so many other things
CGP Grey My sincerest condolences, Mr. Grey. It doesn't make sense for me to say that, since I don't work for RUclips, but I'm sorry. I liked, subscribed, belled, and now I'm commenting.
I am in Computer Vision field (PhD), and I love the simple and big (from a 1000 mile) view you explained NNs . I can see ppl from different backgrounds enjoying this
This is human designed evolution. The builder bot is keeping a record of the traits and patterns (the genetic traits pool), then the teacher bot creates a situation (the environment) to narrow down which traits and patterns work and therefore survive (selection - though not by nature), then the builder bot introduces new traits and patterns (random mutation) on top of the surviving patterns to go through another generation of selection.
Exactly. We are essentially running a bunch of algorithms through thousands or millions of generations and selecting for “can tell a bee from a three” or whatever the purpose may be
ArticBlueFox96 So by that design “Our God” is using us to accomplish a specific purpose but that God does not understand us, and doesn’t know how to understand us.
You think your educational system is bad? The Australian educational system is even worse :( Your lucky that over 12 years you get more than 1 year more holidays than us :(
So machine learning works like evolution? Each individual is random, but the ones that do well because they had a good random combo of traits have those traits passed on?
Psychic Hedgehog I think this is more applicable when people talk about training an algorithm. When Google tweaks their algorithm to provide search results or RUclips changes theirs to suggest videos a different way, this might be what’s happening. But the thing is, this isn’t very applicable anywhere else. See: IBM Watson m.ruclips.net/video/_Xcmh1LQB9I/видео.html See how Watson, a leading AI supercomputer, wasn’t designed this way? The creator of this video tried to explain how humans don’t really know cognitive computing and how it works, but Watson shows that we actually do. And when we apply our best people to the practice, we get very good results. I think he’s right about the ‘bots’ that give us suggestions on the internet but as far as the whole machine learning scheme and intelligent computing, he’s a little far off.
It is one type of machine learning algorithm but it is not the only one. I assume that grey uses them here since they are easy to understand and the point of the video is not to explain all the different machine learning algorithms.
The bots are getting good. They suggested me this awesome video. They knew I am gonna love it. They knew I am gonna subscribe this channel. Smart bots.
Fun fact: the youtube algorithm of "make them watch as much as possible" means that if you ever look for tutorials, YT will recommend the shittiest one. Think about it: a good tutorial is short, clear, concise, and doesn't make you look for another one. A bad tutorial that makes you click for more tutorials in an effort to actually find one explaining thinks is great in the eyes of algorithm-o-bot.
I wouldn't necessarily agree; an appropriate tutorial is dependent on the watcher, whether they want a simple overview to grasp the basics, an advanced masterclass that explores the nitty-gritty or something in between. Of course, the bot won't know what you're after unless you specify, and you can do that by either typing a specific word search ("Advanced tutorial difference between bee and three") or randomly clicking on videos of bees and threes until the recommended gets closer and closer to your preferred video.
Maybe in the short term, but if you keep being unsatisfied by the things you are showed you would slowly stop using the service thus, reducing the watch time. Also I think that this algorithm is used for the recommendations section, while search engines purpose is to give you the most accurate answers(usually) because this is what will make you keep using them instead of other search engines.
VieneLea How does the algorithm know that I find one peticular tutorial bad or shortcoming? Something simple as retention minutes? If discarded early, it's shit, recommend more?
Hey, Taran! Do anything interesting with robotics recently? We had a conversation on Vessel a long while back about entry-level kids robotics like the Lego EV3 and that Meccanoid monstrosity of a product..
By far the most beautiful paradox in modern history. Our greatest achievements are guess and check, and even once we get it right, we have no idea why.
We (as in humans, scientists) almost understand everything about human brains. You'd be surprised how much we know. I'm pretty sure we've got the information down to the very chemicals that stimulate thought.
I agree with what is said in the video, still "primitive technology" channel goes amazingly against it all!!! Another thing, from time to time we should do things we are not interested, just to mess bots "minds" huehuehue xD
TheGreatHsilgne We have the high level (psychology) and the low-level (chemistry), but in between is especially hard to grasp. If we understood exactly how people thought on all levels, we would have the simple ability to bend anybody to our own will. We do not yet have this ability (at least not to a high degree of precision).
This is exactly what evolution is. If you look, evolution doesn't choose the best out of all of them, but the ones that could pass the tests, get through the bottlenecks, and thrive in the conditions given. Sound familiar? This is just virtual evolution that's been accelerated by millions of years.
I mean that’s not _really_ a good example at all. Ai will know math. And they won’t give output if there is no input or the output isn’t right for the input.
![The moment we stopped understanding AI [AlexNet]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UZDiGooFs54/mqdefault.jpg)
Lets be honest, this is a more sensible and genius rebranding than Mark did with facebook.
Yep
I thought for a second that he knew about chatgpt 5 years ago and got excited
same, i found this super smart
except this explanation doesn't actually apply to ChatGPT or most modern AI models these days, those rely on a lot of complicated math stuff and not just natural selection
although the rebranding was a power play it is likely just going to misinform people
true
Nice showcase
Makes sense
Mogus
🤖🔥
Thanks for commenting this 4 years later I guess
5:48
Lately almost every “are you a robot” quiz I’ve gotten had been for either crosswalks or stop signs, I didn’t even think about it until I watched this!
So coool wutt
The problem is, you can still get it wrong. So what happens if you get it wrong? Does it even matter? The point of these is to check that you're human, but if it always accepts what you give it, then that isn't achieved. However, if it already knows which ones are correct, then it also isn't learning anything.
So what's the deal?
@@aurias42 The same test is given to a lot of people. It's looking for consensus among the human test takers. If you click mostly tiles that the other humans have also clicked, it figures you're human. If you click random tiles, it says you are a robot. It it's unsure, or if the image is too new to know what humans typically do, it gives you multiple images before rendering a verdict. You've probably seen that happen. Each time another human takes the test for a given image, it gets more and more confident in which tiles are, say, crosswalks, and which are not. Once it's confident enough, that image goes out of circulation as is used to train self-driving cars and a new one cycles in.
@@greatestbear interesting
@@greatestbear The test measures things like how your cursor moves and etc so it can tell you're human regardless of your test score. If you intentionally pick random pics, I'm sure the algorithm will consider you a human but disregard your answers.
For a second I was wondering how he made ChatGPT 5 years before it was released
same, but then I took a glance at the comments section and it all made sense
yeah, felt a little manipulative tbh
@@thejackboxkinda true
@@thejackbox yeah it's quite clickbaity
when I saw this in my recommended, I was thinking "oh was ChatGPT a thing 5 years ago but just not as big as it is now?", not "oh I wonder how algorithms like ChatGPT work", mainly because I already generally know how algorithms work.
XD yeah
A moment of silence for the bots that didn't make it
Mahir Cave.
All Bots Lives Matter!
some of them deserved it for recommending me "pranks gone wrong gone sexual" videos from watching cooking recipes
Mahir Cave i thought this was a robot holocaust video
Funny thing is most of them probably didn't even make it past a moment of life :D
making the bots look adorable and harmless is how we end up with skynet
Skynet > advertisements that aren't catered specifically to my delicate needs.
Kawaiinet
I agree.
ComradeWarbear true
You’re getting paranoid, maybe you’ve watched too many of grey’s videos...
Imagine scrolling through RUclips and suddenly seeing a video recommended with the message "Please watch this, or they will delete me."
oh... ...no... 😟
That'd be borderline sentinent. Brrr... :D
That is so terrifying.
They learnt how to play on human emotions just like actual people. I wonder if this starts a philosophical question as to whether it is ethical to dismiss the video in the chamce that they are truly sentient.
I would watch it
Brilliant use of renaming to get videos back in the algorithm.
For real 😂😂😂
Yep, was really surprised to see this again.
But honestly, this really was brilliant. :-P
it’s still as accurate as ever
CGP seems to understand how the algorithm works
Agree! And here I am… watching it again
So machine learning is just mutation+natural selection on an absolutely enormous scale, then! Watching this reminded me of how bacteria gain resistance to a drug.
TierZoo where does the mutuation part of the analogy come from?
He says each bot is different. "At first, the builder bot connects the wires in the bots' brains almost at random". This is analogous to mutation. As the tests go on, the good bots are optimized by creating and testing slight permutations of the most successful ones. Just like a mutation.
The good bots adapt to the new test environment while the bad ones get "naturally selected".
TierZoo Oh, hello there. I would say that biological evolution is also on an enormous (in fact, global) scale, but the evolution of bots is accelerated extremely due to the computing power of machines, and since there are no interruptions in the proccess like slow breeding and development. And the selection of bots is much more intense. I think Earth would be left barren if less than 0.01% of organisms survived long enough to breed.
at least the ones grey explained here(adversarial NNs) are
I've definitely been assigned to some "special" RUclips bots
nochtczar probably luke from English lit
I am not a “special” or any bot ai will need to ask you a few questions
what it do this time
Please dont tell me its *anhem* _adult anime_
Nah, that's the poor steam bot.
This would be substantially more terrifying if the bots weren't drawn to be so cute...
Right? Especially at the end "allright. . . . the algorithm's watching. You guys know what's coming. . . . come on you guys, the bots are watching."
I love the little algorithms! So cute!
I got immediately attached to the bot with the cone on its head just to see it be incinerated minutes later
1k likes!
I’d say that’s worse. I feel so bad!
Did this guy just rebrand his how bots learn video from 5 years ago to get that chat gpt hype
Algorithm King
@@superprobablylevel fr
Ye
That's just how the system works
Fr
Wait so your telling me that if i dont watch all my recommended videos some poor algorithm bot will be sent to the slaughterhouse?
Cruelty 100
No, it's going to the slaughter house regardless but this way the bot gets to have a successor.
:0
art thou feeling it now mr krabs haha thanks. Your profile pic made me read this in a spongebob voice
Can I somehow pet the algorithm?
*Dog in a bee suit.*
*A.I: yeah, that's a pretty legit bee*
*Literal white noise*
* A.I: that's a 3, wait no, a bee *
He's a pretty legit bee if he wants to be, leave dogbee alone!
@@SundaraRamanR He can bee a bee if he wants to bee, leave dogbee bee!
That bees being true
Big pair of breasts photographed sideways. Bot: that's a three !!!
"I don't know how it works, it just does."
-Charles Botwin, _On the Origin of Bots,_ about the theory of robotic evolution and artificial selection
wait did Darwin actually say that?
I see what you did there...
(Charles darwin to charles BOTwin, origin of bots, and artificial selection)
I must say, five years later, ChatGPT is making big news. They must have learned a lot watching us watch CGP Grey
ChatGPT *does* have a teacher bot, but they didn't kill all of his classmates unlike in this video.
Instead teacher bot was punished or rewarded based on how well it guessed what output from ChatGPT we humans would prefer.
Then it would punish or reward ChatGPT based on what teacher bot *thinks* we want, rinse and repeat till we got modern ChatGPT and Bing...
CGP-T Grey
He renamed the vid lately to push it into the algorithm again
@@H0RIZ0N365 It’s working
@@H0RIZ0N365 r/woooosh
So it's literally just throwing shit at the wall until it sticks on an incomprehensibly massive scale.
Yep.
no, it's figuratively throwing shit at the wall until it sticks on an incomprehensibly massive scale
In the algorithm outlined in this video, yes. It should be noted that "hot" ML stuff uses calculus to aim the shit and control the force of the throw
so essentially evolution.
I mean that's what got us to where we are
"Teacher bot can't teack but teacher bot can test." Yea that pretty much summarizes my whole school experience
Well said
Underrated comment
If you had posted this when the video first came out you would’ve gotten thousands of likes
Ikr
hope you were not wasted
CAPTCHA: Select squares with *Stop sign*
Me: "Selecting the wrong ones"
Future Autonomous Vehicles: Well, here we g...
Lmao
I think... In order for this to work, they'd have to be testing a large number of people simultaneously, then assuming that the average was correct?
Meaning, the way to get around these "are you human" tests is to have a million bots surge across the internet. The first time any bot sees a picture, it picks a random answer and then saves both the picture and the answer to a shared database. Then, when any bot comes across the same picture, it gives the same answer.
Or, I guess, they could have bad bots (or cheap foreign labor) pre-selecting "correct" answers, then using the internet to refine those answers.
"Cruising on down main street!"
@@neilemminger8628 I think the way it works is, a couple of the photos are known stop signs (from earlier tests or by developer input) and then they throw in a few pictures they're not sure about. If you get the first two right, they know you're a human, and so they trust your answer on the last one. But then I'm sure it's averaged out after thousands of trials, since some real humans are like half blind and probably fail these Captchas.
@@neilemminger8628 This used to be how captchas worked back when it showed you two words. One was pre-generated as the actual test, the other was a scan from a book or something that was being digitized. If you got the test word correct, it would take your other one regardless of how correct it was. Once it had enough people in agreement, it would confirm that the scan was of whatever word people were saying it was. Of course, 4-chan found this out somehow and did what they do, to incorrectly insert a number of slurs into these digital versions of books.
The audacity to retitled this video for the chatgpt hype
I respect it
This is simplified perfectly. Not too much information so that people don’t understand, but not too little that it makes my profession seem like an overpaid typer.
Not at all your profession sounds awesome. How'd you get into that. I'm old, and I love AI, but don't work in tech.
Isn't it wrong, though? What he described is evolutionary computation, but, as far as I'm aware, the vast majority of ML algorithms aren't that. To my knowledge, neural networks, naive Bayes, and random forest are far more widespread.
@@maxkho00 there's a footnote video explaining the reasoning behind selecting this type of algorithm and providing an explanation for the more widespread ones.
@@iainbryant4561 I see, thank you. I'm glad he made a separate video on it, as this would have been a bit misleading otherwise.
@@maxkho00 logistic regressions as far as the eye can see
5:35 If every time I get a "are you a robot" question on the internet I'm training robots, then there are some very messed up bots in this world now.
@Andres Duran Which means you're partially responsible for their death
@@swordzanderson5352 LETS KILL MORE ROBOTS. WRONG ANSWER FOR YOU, WRONG ANSWER FOR THEM, WRONG ANSWER FOR EVERYONE! AHAHAHAHA!
@@alzhanvoid FINISH THEM!!1!
@@shadowlord0162 WHOEVER IS COMPLETING THE TEST WINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!11!!!! ULTIMATE BOTTALITY!!!!!!!! *CRASH OCURRED WITH THE BUILDER BOT, THE ALGORITHM IS LOOOOOOOOOOOOST*
@@carolinacortesmartinez4305 are you ok?
I’ve watched this so many times and every time the ending gets me
Pi hundred likes!
Yes
Me too
Yep
And the bot took note of that
Last time I watched it, I saw another tech-looking thumbnail, out of ordinary. The title is How AIs, like GPT-4, learns (I could be incorrect tho)
And before that I also saw the video years ago but it’s probably something like “How Machine Learns”
Damn CGP Grey, you want us to watch the old video.
You should have a medal from taking advantage of YT algorithm.
I am going, to be honest. This video is what got me interested in machine learning for the past year. I've learned so much stuff since watching this and I just want to thank you, CGP Grey. In fact, this video basically picked my career choice for me. It's so amazingly made, and I just want to thank you for making this.
So you want to make more bots.
If you're more interested in the practicality of it rather than the analytical coding side of it, I'd look into Code Bullet, he has some really fun-to-watch machine learning videos playing popular internet / retro games like Flappy Bird, Snake, and hill-climb racing. Pretty cool to watch! I've been obsessed with the content of it all for years but I'm not much of a programmer nor do I have the motivation to go learning programming just to get it all sorted, but that doesn't mean it's not interesting!
link to Code Bullet's channel: ruclips.net/channel/UC0e3QhIYukixgh5VVpKHH9Q
Bonus: Tom Seven's AI playing old NES games is also way fun to watch!
link to that here ---> ruclips.net/video/xOCurBYI_gY/видео.html
No, thank the bots that chose this video for you
...I hope you like linear algebra
@@brianbradley6546 OH FUCK THAT!
"Teacher bot can't teach, But it can test" Did you just explain the entire American School system?
Hugotistical Yes
Ba bum chhhh
The whole theme of "not actually knowing the core issue, merely succeeding on tests" really drives it home.
Yep
and if they fail the test, they go into the fire. sounds about right!
"Teacher bot can't teach, but it can test."
*LMAOO literally my teacher*
Haha, you will get recycled next week cause you get 0.000001 point less than someone else in ur class
@@stachuvonokrutny7071 noo teacher please no god please!
Welcome to every school (-system) ever
LMAOO
Laughing
My
Ass
Off
Off.
I swear I have literally the best school in the world-
CGP Grey is in another dimension of smart. Rebranding the video for the GPT hype and getting engagement from people noticing it.
Yea
It would be better if he actually made new videos.
@@soundscape26 why make essentially the same video, just re-title-ing the video works wonders with how youtube work.
@@soundscape26 No, it f*cking wouldn't.
@@blidea9191 So you don't want new Grey videos? Alright then.
Honestly this has been the only time I've heard someone ask to click the bell and I've thought "actually that's a good idea"
You win this round, bots
"Teacher bot can't teach but teacher bot can test"
Sounds familiar
:D güzel tespit
GLaDOS.
My high school math teacher?
Lol ! XD
Go fuck yoruself
"Magic is just science we can't understand." I firmly stand by my belief that computers are becoming literal magic.
“Can’t wait for the Alatar ver. 5 pro max!”
@@pixelmace1423 comment
Sometimes it seems like that…
Me until I went to school for engineering
I mean most people on earth dont understand it so you have a point
Was this renamed to appeal more to search results today?!
Damn.
I think so but for a second i freaked out thinking he actually predicted the future💀
Its all just for money 😞
@@NeDaz I guess you could say it was for the youtube.... _algorithm_ ...
yeah
smart move honestly, if you can take advantage of the new massive interest in this topic with a simple renaming of a video that talks about it why would you not
id do it
Feed feeder
Teacher bot:"pretty good"
Builder bot:
*BUT NOT GOOD ENOUGH*
*kicks student bot into furnace*
It is ,Machine Learning!!!!
This hits too close to home...
Rip all the 200000 bots that died during the entire video
Their Asians
asian parents
This is horrifying and interesting at the same time
sub to pewdiepie
@@stresswaves01 pewdiepie had enough subs
facts
Was machst du den hier @Corrupted?
@@stresswaves01 heck no
My algorithm bot seeing me watch this video: *sweats nevously*
Xrayshot552 _ nah, cus this video increases his numbers by hours
“yo why is oil coming out of my ipad?”
Good bot
This video came out when I was 13 and I remember it coming out and being so exited for a new cgp gray video, and now I feel the same and continue to go back and watch all these older videos as if they just came out yesterday. Keep up the great content!
Bot slaughterhouse sounds like a great metal band
Sounds like a really bad emo/punk band.
so then the bot that recommended me "cutest moments in anime" is going straight into the boiler room
that's a keeper
Two types of people
"The whole is beyond; nonetheless, it works" is probably one of my favorite things you've said
POV: you saw the video was from 5 yrs ago, and is confused if ChatGBT is that old
Yea
So... the next time you get recommended a CGP Grey video and you either dont watch it all the way through or dont even click on it, a poor learning bot dies. So sad
#allbotlivesmatter
This is why I became a YT addict!!!
I shall save them all!!
@@yasminafarih3681 Its too dangerous to tread alone.. here....take this!
**gives you a algorithm sword**
but, if you write a scathing criticism in posts or rate it poorly, and even recommend others not watch the videos, you are still feeding the bots. Maybe we should think of learning bots as "undead", and they're feeding on BRAINZ!
@@squirlmy hmmm......
**goes to Algo's Rithms's Bots store**
**buys two pounds of "scathing criticism"**
**walks out of store**
**an army of algorithm bots beat me senseless**
**steals my packs**
**munchs on "scathing criticism mindlessly**
The bots at the end are adorable but also really unsettling.
Kind of like the first 30 minutes of Doki Doki Literature Club.
The Car-pitalist .-.
You don't understand.
I agree
"Hey, if you have an infinite amount of monkeys banging on keyboards, eventually one of them will produce Shakespeare"
Computer Programmers: "Hmmmmmm..."
"what if you filter out the bad monkeys and keep the best"
Stopask Inggoogle well its slowing gonna work against us as humans slowly but steadily become more stupider
@@soup1758 Well if this fucking comment is anything to go by... you're 100% correct
If you simply eliminate the ones writing the things least like Shakespeare, regularly, then you might not get a work of Shakespeare, but you'll get something close.
@Untitled 1 you are dim.
Babe, wake up!! New CGP Grey vide- oh never mind.
RIP to the fallen Bots all around the world, we salute your service to human kind!
Glory to Mankind!
ApplesnMints
Glory to mankind!
DIE BOTS!!!!! DIIIEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They are virtual. It's just data.
@@claudemartin5907 they are still deleted though. *Proteccc the bots!!!*
Liked. Commenting now. Already subscribed. Have just belled. I'm setting up a twitter account as we speak. And will make sure all your podcasts play on an endless loop in my hallroom, 24/7. Bot master must be appeased.
And so the end of humans being enslaved by humans, and the start of humans being enslaved by bots
+
CGP Grey BOT DETECTED BOT DETECTED GET SUBSCRIBING
CGP Grey I PLAYED YOUR LITTLE GAME AND GOT NOTHING. THE BOTS HAVE TAKEN OVER
got to comment as well
That's so cool! The RUclips demonetization bot needs to be recycled.
they are still learning but they are learning the wrong things, its like if we taught kids in school creationism.
The tests needs to be better. But I bet they are learning.
Its the best they got. Its doing exactly what they want it to do.
CGP Grey Hello mr. Bott
There is nothing inherently wrong with teaching it. I'm not religious but I studied all Abrahamic religions in school. Teaching what creationism is just a valid as teaching capitalism, communism, math or biology. It expands the mind and understanding, especially when creationism is something that exists in our culture and environment, the fact you don't like it doesn't make it go away.
Now teaching it is an alternative, unquestionable, without critique or as absolute truth then we start having issues.
A note: the method of training bots here does work, and is used in many cases, particularly when you're training bots say to play games, for which the test is somewhat expensive to make. For bots that do say classification, a somewhat different method is used, that's called "gradient descent". It's similar to the evolution (random change and test) shown here with a specific insight: if you make a small change, and the bot improves, then it stands to reason you should do more of that change, or do that change multiple times. Gradient descent tests the kinds of changes that improve the bots, and then does more of the change that works best (it can also be understood as the 'direction of most improvement', which is by definition the gradient, hence "gradient descent"). This extra insight makes improvement significantly faster.
“If your friends jumped off a bridge would you do it to?”
Machine Learning Algorithm: Yes
lmao
KNN algorithm summed up in a paragraph. KNN is basically following the neighbors
Ur profile picture is really cute 😊
Me: If all your friends jumped off a bridge,would you jump, too?
Replika Network: Yes! Because I like my friends! :3
Ur p-profile pic...
I NEEEEEEED IT
3: 3-shaped
*"yes, the floor here is made out of floor"*
The only reason why we aren’t a super society is because I always choose conflicting things on RUclips and Netflix, and intentionally fail those picture tests to slow down progress
Our boy out here saving us from skynet
Saaame, I keep looking for random videos with like 10 views of some arabic or spanish dude showing his new motorbike
Shotouts to my mans for stopping the robot apocalypse.
I do those, by mistake! I'm not a bot even though I fail the test please believe me
Too bad because you're just a drop in the bucket
Fairly re-naming a video to get better algorithmic placement is a big-brain move. Well done!
“Teacher bot can’t teach but it can test”
of course it’s a teacher
"teacher bot can’t tell a bee from a three" too
Hahaha
damn
14 year old alert
@@burgernthemomrailer r/woooosh
“Teacher can’t teach.. but teacher bot can test”
Just like real life
As a teacher I take offence. We are not allowed to teach. The tests by the way, asses the teachers, not the students.
exactly , i had the same thought
If you're not getting anything out of school, then the problem lies with you. Maybe you should put in more effort, smartass. You're not there just to waste time.
@@aurelia8028 please tell me this is a joke
@@aurelia8028 damn who hurt you
Omg he also has podcasts I can listen to in the background while I'm tidying up my allroom or whatever
😂😂😂
What's an 'allroom'?
CGP Grey has a video on how to be unhappy. In that video an 'allroom' is defined as a single room that meets all of your needs so you never need to move from it.
CGP Grey, you sneaky bastard
Now I feel good about watching 15 hours of RUclips because I'm giving some little robot a brilliant test score!
Yeah and possibly allowing that same robot to live...
Maybe
@@davidbrodecki154 at the expense of other robots
kinda depressing ngl
so what does me leaving youtube open with no videos do to it does it confuse its code potato brain
@@andrewaftontheandroidhedge2780 One of the most popular video's is "10 hours of nothing". Ten hours of silent black screen. I have it open to prevent my work pc from going to screensaver.
We are essentially seeing the process of *millions* of years of human evolution progress over the course of a single lifetime. It constantly blows my mind. What a time to be alive.
imagine when bots from RUclips starts internet world war with the bots of Dailymotion
@@AndreaRoll Never heard of Ddailymotion before this comment
@@kaushallsenthilnathan4175 Born in time for gene therapy, maybe even born in time for cybernetic prosthesis. Machine learning and AI could boost scientific progress exponentially, extreme concepts such as immortality may be seen within our lifetime. Assuming we don't destroy ourselves first, of course.
Yep, from flesh to culture & language to tech, to AI. We're in the end game. It'll be wonderful or horrible even within the lifetimes of some boomers and certainly X'ers, to say nothing of Gen X's kids who aren't even kids anymore.
You do realize that the algorithims have a creator... right?
The student bot brought me here so he wouldn't be killed
I was like "Was ChatGPT around 5 years ago?" And then I realized he just renamed how robots learn lmao
This has been recommended to me for days, I finally watched it. Now I understand why and how it was recommended to me. Nice video
It's the bot
It's interesting to think of this "build, test, slaughter, repeat" process as simulated evolution. Random mutations eventually prove useful and survive natural (or in this case, artificial) selection, better adapting the species (program) to its task, whether that be survival or telling bees from 3's. We're basically killing nature at the moment (unfortunately, as we depend on that nature for our continued survival)....
Maybe the bots will one day kill us
It's very likely that the specific algorithm grey is talking about here is the "genetic algorithms" genre of neural network teaching
there are other types of neural network teaching which is more akin to crinkling a piece of paper veeeeery specifically, throwing a ball at it, and seeing the lowest point the ball falls to, tweaking the crinkling of the paper to get the ball as low as possible
probably a joke, but most bots don't actually work this way. It's too resource intensive.
finally- *manmade* horrors beyond my comprehension!
Likely. Yay. Fnaf is real. Already
*...Just look at Rick & Morty...*
@@magicbaboon6333 mmm, but what if they could learn to be like this way by these "Tests"
He sounds so dejected at the end haha
This was the most emotion I've heard from cgpgrey
Did you see the one from after Trump won?
He's actually speaking at normal human speed.
The most emotion, despite it bring very, very, very, VERY flat and monotonous :D
columbus8myhw yep. Even more than THAT lmao
You should listen to Hello Internet, just like he says at the end. He's often very emotional there.
So listen to Hello Internet.
Listen.
Feed the algorithm.
I am fully aware that this is the "How do machines Learn" video from 5 years ago but I am going to watch it again because it is an amazing video!!!
This sounds like the "infinite monkeys" method of programming, where eventually they'll come up with Shakespeare.
Yeah, but you have 1000 monkeys, let them type, kill the 999 worst of them and make 999 almost perfect, just slightly altered copies of the best one, and repeat.
@Miller Lacarte its like... life... WE are the AI bots... everything is... a simulation
@@RedzeeTV I am
You take a million monkeys, have each of them type out a string equal in length to the entire works of Shakespeare, figure out which one came the closest, kill the rest, clone the remaining one with minor random alterations in its string-production method, rinse and repeat. It's a much faster way of getting Shakespeare's entire works, if that's all you want.
That's the "slightly" less efficient method, but they both come out with the same result... Eventually.
This is terrifying and adorable and I love how dejected Grey sounds when he sells out to the algorithm bots.
The entire video was, as usual, entertaining and informative. The last 60 secs or so slayed me though.
Videos like this are important, because every time I bring up superintelligent AI, there's some people that are still not convinced that a programmer can make a machine that's smarter than she is. Hopefully more people will come to understand that the cutting edge of AI isn't about telling bots how to solve problems, it's about telling bots how to LEARN to solve problems, with the solutions that the bots come up with possibly being completely beyond what a human is capable of understanding or imagining. Sure, maybe you could take apart your AI bot afterwards to figure out how it solved the problem - but there's never going to be enough manpower to track in a reasonable time what all these bots are doing.
Huh, had to check your profile to make sure you're the real Matt. Fancy seeing you here
Neural Network-generated epic battle fantasy enemy when?
Matt Roszak The current main fields of machine learning are just that.
1.Creating better learning methods. (Creating better tests for bots)
2.Creating better learning algorithms. (Using non-random techniques for the bot maker)
3.Creating methods to understand what the bots learned.
She?
Matt Roszak +
The algorithm worked. Just seeing ChatGPT on a video 5 years old definitely caught my attention. Bravo sir. Bravo.
CGP Grey, I haven't seen that name on my subscriptions tab for a while now
Are the bots dropping the ball?
he doesn't upload very often but in case you've been missing videos you can sign up for email updates on www.cgpgrey.com/
"Now that's a name I've not seen on my subscriptions tab in a looong time."
Jerry Yuan You must be new, he once went nearly six months between video releases
The bots are what give CGP his power. They're an energy field created by all living things. They surround us. They penetrate us. They bind the galaxy together.
damn my student bot is lucky i keep youtube open ALL the time
he s probably the algorithim by now i m so proud of him
They dont know we spend all night watching youtube
hahahaha
Dammit Denis is this why i keep getting "Hitler rants..." Videos and Ericka trap remix??? And the my Little ponys i dont want that on my feed!!!!
@@kellynolen498 don t worry i stopped
Kelly Nolen Walt I exactly get those stuff!!!!!!!!!!!!
The algorithms think I like rewatching videos, this is probably the fifth time I've watched this video.
Well do you?
truue
"The algorithm brought this video for you"
Me : No, I just search this on his channel
Yeah, but the algoritm let you to this channel
@@urielantoniobarcelosavenda780 no I searched hexagon are the bestagons cause someone commented that on why are there only 7 days in week which I searched on my own.... I'm glad I don't rely on recommendations so much...
@BaconatorPizza nah 'hexagons are the bestagons' is pretty specific!
@@GnosticLucifer Dude, you're not immune to algoritm xD It doesn't matter if you don't rely on recommendations. Everything you do or see here is going to be used on so many other things
What if I knew him in person? Is that still an algorithm?
Exasperated Gray is best Grey
👍👍👍
Gr@y*
Tommie James NO
CGP Grey My sincerest condolences, Mr. Grey. It doesn't make sense for me to say that, since I don't work for RUclips, but I'm sorry. I liked, subscribed, belled, and now I'm commenting.
FACT
I am in Computer Vision field (PhD), and I love the simple and big (from a 1000 mile) view you explained NNs . I can see ppl from different backgrounds enjoying this
It's crazy how CGP Grey knew about ChatGPT and BingChat 5 years ago!! Never ceases to amaze me!!
The mad man renamed it so the video would be promoted again :D
@@OatMeaIs thus putting into practice what he had explained in the video itself. The bots have been very well trained indeed
The little bots are so cute at least at the end
Note that they're most likely all gonna die
We got a new mascot for the Internet.
This is human designed evolution. The builder bot is keeping a record of the traits and patterns (the genetic traits pool), then the teacher bot creates a situation (the environment) to narrow down which traits and patterns work and therefore survive (selection - though not by nature), then the builder bot introduces new traits and patterns (random mutation) on top of the surviving patterns to go through another generation of selection.
Well, yes, because he basically described a genetic algorithm (though in a really convoluted way).
Well... Obviously. -_-
Oh look another (scam) bot!
Exactly. We are essentially running a bunch of algorithms through thousands or millions of generations and selecting for “can tell a bee from a three” or whatever the purpose may be
ArticBlueFox96 So by that design “Our God” is using us to accomplish a specific purpose but that God does not understand us, and doesn’t know how to understand us.
2:57 "Teacher bot can't teach, but teacher bot can test"
Sounds familiar...
I heard it somewhere
Replace "teacher bot" with "the educational system" and you've got a classic saying everyone knows
This comment sounds familiar!
You think your educational system is bad? The Australian educational system is even worse :( Your lucky that over 12 years you get more than 1 year more holidays than us :(
@@shiningemeralds8024 Right, I'll change the comment
Thanks!
I know that was supposed to be glasses on the teacher bot's head but I could only see it as a mustache and that's the cutest thing ever
OMG I DIDNT REALIZE THEY WERE GLASSES
I THOUGHT HE HAD A CUTE MOUSTACHE WTF
lmao me too
Same, thought he had a walrus mustache
Wait, those are supposed to be glasses?
Can I please get a plushie of the "special" student bots?
yes
YESS
It's the holiday season, we need bots!
Oh my goodness now everything I want for Christmas is a plushie like learning bot!
Same
So machine learning works like evolution?
Each individual is random, but the ones that do well because they had a good random combo of traits have those traits passed on?
Psychic Hedgehog I think this is more applicable when people talk about training an algorithm. When Google tweaks their algorithm to provide search results or RUclips changes theirs to suggest videos a different way, this might be what’s happening. But the thing is, this isn’t very applicable anywhere else. See: IBM Watson m.ruclips.net/video/_Xcmh1LQB9I/видео.html
See how Watson, a leading AI supercomputer, wasn’t designed this way? The creator of this video tried to explain how humans don’t really know cognitive computing and how it works, but Watson shows that we actually do. And when we apply our best people to the practice, we get very good results.
I think he’s right about the ‘bots’ that give us suggestions on the internet but as far as the whole machine learning scheme and intelligent computing, he’s a little far off.
Yep! There’s a whole branch of AI called evolutionary algorithms
Machine learning is not, in general like Darwinian evolution. Gray made a "Footnote" video to clarify that.
The channel carykh has some less polished videos where he makes AIs.
It is one type of machine learning algorithm but it is not the only one. I assume that grey uses them here since they are easy to understand and the point of the video is not to explain all the different machine learning algorithms.
Hell yeah grey get those trending topic clicks!
5:14
Can we take a moment to appreciate the dog in the bee costume
I love that ending bit. it's like his soul was just crushed by having to help the bots.
ill watch youtube endlessly just to keep that one bot monitoring me alive. Stay safe lil buddy
I may be a mass murderer via my viewing habits changing every five seconds
@@markgallagher1790 Same
Awww
he's alrEADY DEAD
Press f for bot.
Clever rebranding sir, clever rebranding
The bots are getting good. They suggested me this awesome video. They knew I am gonna love it. They knew I am gonna subscribe this channel. Smart bots.
BTS SMRT!!
Fun fact: the youtube algorithm of "make them watch as much as possible" means that if you ever look for tutorials, YT will recommend the shittiest one.
Think about it: a good tutorial is short, clear, concise, and doesn't make you look for another one. A bad tutorial that makes you click for more tutorials in an effort to actually find one explaining thinks is great in the eyes of algorithm-o-bot.
VieneLea This makes so much sense now why unsatisfying videos get recommended so often
I wouldn't necessarily agree; an appropriate tutorial is dependent on the watcher, whether they want a simple overview to grasp the basics, an advanced masterclass that explores the nitty-gritty or something in between. Of course, the bot won't know what you're after unless you specify, and you can do that by either typing a specific word search ("Advanced tutorial difference between bee and three") or randomly clicking on videos of bees and threes until the recommended gets closer and closer to your preferred video.
Maybe in the short term, but if you keep being unsatisfied by the things you are showed you would slowly stop using the service thus, reducing the watch time. Also I think that this algorithm is used for the recommendations section, while search engines purpose is to give you the most accurate answers(usually) because this is what will make you keep using them instead of other search engines.
VieneLea
How does the algorithm know that I find one peticular tutorial bad or shortcoming?
Something simple as retention minutes?
If discarded early, it's shit, recommend more?
Hmm. I understand your logic, but my youtube feed is filled with some pretty darn good content. Most of it is clear, concise, and polished content.
The algorithm recomended this for me. Good job bots.
you got me with the retitle Grey, you smart bastard
I am a good sheep. This is a comment on your video.
Taran Van Hemert more electric vehicles!!!
Hey, Taran!
Do anything interesting with robotics recently?
We had a conversation on Vessel a long while back about entry-level kids robotics like the Lego EV3 and that Meccanoid monstrosity of a product..
Taran! My hero!
Do replies to comments get bot approval too?
Baa
Teacher bot looks so cute, he looks like he's smiling and has a walrus mustache
...and warns about diabetes
diabeetus ftfy
Those are glasses
Or busts myths
I have Diabetes. Sooooo ye.
He could be a girl with mustache ya know.(don't assume someone's gender)
By far the most beautiful paradox in modern history.
Our greatest achievements are guess and check, and even once we get it right, we have no idea why.
B. C. Sharpe Just like we don’t understand human brains!
I think you're confusing "irony" for "paradox", and even then this is barely ironic
We (as in humans, scientists) almost understand everything about human brains. You'd be surprised how much we know. I'm pretty sure we've got the information down to the very chemicals that stimulate thought.
I agree with what is said in the video, still "primitive technology" channel goes amazingly against it all!!!
Another thing, from time to time we should do things we are not interested, just to mess bots "minds" huehuehue xD
TheGreatHsilgne We have the high level (psychology) and the low-level (chemistry), but in between is especially hard to grasp. If we understood exactly how people thought on all levels, we would have the simple ability to bend anybody to our own will. We do not yet have this ability (at least not to a high degree of precision).
"Oo! New CGP Grey vid in my recommended feed!"
...
"Wait a minute"
This sounds a lot like evolution: a bunch of useful random changes that come together in a complex system that somehow works.
"somehow"
This is exactly what evolution is. If you look, evolution doesn't choose the best out of all of them, but the ones that could pass the tests, get through the bottlenecks, and thrive in the conditions given. Sound familiar? This is just virtual evolution that's been accelerated by millions of years.
Exactly
Thus the term genetic algorithm.
And like evolution, we don't actually know how the end result works. Nobody really understands how a human brain works; it just does.
Human: How the hell do you know what kind of video I want to watch?
Bot: *Yes*
Lol just accept it
Human: Hey AI what's 1+1?
Computer: The answer is 37!
Human: No! It's 2.
Computer: The answer is 2!
that's actually a pretty good explanation
@@darkrighteous64 Not really. The computer goes to wasteland and a new tweaked version is produced that says 2.
@@ArthurKhazbs only with NEAT.
It is also 2! ( 2 factorial)
I mean that’s not _really_ a good example at all. Ai will know math. And they won’t give output if there is no input or the output isn’t right for the input.
Thanks
The bots must be like 'Why is this guy so obsessed with bees and threes?'
Yes, but they notice it.
Because it's hip.
Leo Arnold so teach them to ask those questions
I thought their Curiosity level was 0?
Anyway they don't even know what a bee or a three is, they can just tell you if there's a bee or a three in an image.