Here are a couple more stats: Swimming - 50 metres freestyle (Long Course) Men - 20.91 Women - 23.67 13.2% 50 metres freestyle (Short Course) Men - 20.16 Women - 22.93 13.74% 100 metres freestyle Men (World Record) - 46.96 Women (Olympic Record) - 51.96 (I've chosen the OR 'cause the WR is slower). 10.65% 1500 metres freestyle (Long Course) Men - 14:31.02 Women - 15:20.48 5.67% 1500 metres freestyle (Short Course) Men - 14:08.06 Women - 15:18.01 8.24% Javelin throw Men (WR) - 98,48 Women (WR) - 72,28 26.6% Men (OR) - 90,57 Women (OR) - 71,53 21% The length of the javelin is 260-270cm in the men's category and 220-230cm in the female category, and, for categories from 18 years, a minimum weight of 800 grams for men and 600 grams for women. Shot put Men (WR) - 23,37 Women (WR) - 22,63 3.16% Men (OR) - 23,30 Women (OR) - 22,41 3.82% The weight of the bullet is 7.26kg for men and 4kg for women. This weight can vary according to the age of the practitioners; 6kg are thrown in the male youth category and 4kg in the female youth category, 5kg are thrown in the male minor category and 3kg in the female minor category. Disc throw Men (WR) - 74,08 Women (WR) - 76,89 3.79% in favour of women Men (OR) - 69,89 Women (OR) - 72,30 3.44% in favour of women In this last case is worth nothing the following: In men's competition, the disc measures between 219 and 221mm in diameter, between 44 and 46mm wide and weighs 2 kilograms. In the female branch, the disc measures between 180 and 182mm in diameter, 37 to 39mm wide and weighs 1 kilogram.
Female shot put, 400 meters and disc throw records made by Eastern German women are totally fake, they are - as Ines Geipel said - "the result of a state crime". And probably are fake a lot of other 80s world records (800 meters, 100 m, 200 m high jump, long jump etc...).
Yes, a 9-12 percent difference seems small, but the difference between gold and 6th place at Tokyo was 1.8 percent. I would love for you to compare the boys records with the Olympic or World women's records. It's pretty eye-opening that the best 16-year-old American boys could break or compete with the World record times for women. And several of those records are suspect as they were set in the 1980s when steroids were abused. Strange that they havent been broken in 35 years...
Bro what eye-opening? Like ya there's a 18y/o boy who's like that fast, but if u use a lil bit of common sense so it's actually an exceptions. And just wanna remind u of the race where the women completed against so many (200) men, but she was the only one that won it, so biologically speaking, her endurance gave her an advantage
No man under 1,80 ever made time under 10 sec, Female record is 1,70m and did better than Percy Williams(who set world record once) or Reggie Walker. Usain Bolt is the tallest 1,95. it's to do with the higly selected phenotype in male circuits---> In Bolt's race there wasn't a single white or short man. If you see female circuits it's a diversity.
🤣we’re more superior of course girls can beat boys at racing and boys can beat girls but when it come to like top girl athlete fully trained and a top guy athlete fully trained most likely the guy will win
@@J89-n1z A study in the Journal of Applied Physiology found that men had an average of 26 lbs. (12 kilograms) more skeletal muscle mass than women. Women also exhibited about 40 percent less upper-body strength and 33 percent less lower-body strength, on average. That's facts.
calling a 1 second gap in 100m a "9% difference" just seems funny. 1 second is an absolute eternity in the 100m. for perspective, the GREATEST WOMAN OF ALL TIME, running her BEST RACE EVER...wouldn't have even made it past the 1st round of qualifications at this year's men's Olympics.
Forget about qualifying for the olympics. The greatest woman of all time would lose to high schoolers. Edit: The top middle school 100m record for males is better than the women's WORLD record. Flo would lose to a 13 year old male.
@@jasonk1891 youtube is strange today xD. I've got a notification about your comment, but I can't read it in this thread. I hope, I will get it tomorrow
With this kind of statistics, I think a much more meaningful way to put it in perspective is to look at what would be the ranking of the women's record within the men's performances. For example, the 100m record of 10.49 is ranked 6350, meaning that 6349 men have gone faster than that. If you take only this year's performances, it has been beaten by 799 men.
Women are doing great. Given equal opportunity they can compete, If you know history, womens are mostly treated as 2nd class citizens across the civilization, this era gave them opportunity to compete and they are doing fantastic
I thought that the longer the run, the smaller the difference, but with a 24-hour run, we have a significant gap again (men have a record of 303.506 km, women 259.991, which is a difference of 16.7%).
The longer the run the larger the difference obviously (maybe not in percentage, but in time ofc) Example logic: If you ran 20 m with usain Bolt you might be tied but if you run 100m you're bound to lose.
@@malharjajoo7393 The problem is that comparing numerical values is pointless. From the percentage difference you can draw conclusions (for example: the difference decreases with the distance), and from the absolute values we will only learn that the longer the distance, the longer runners run.
I thought longer distances would be alot closer. Man men really do seem to have most of the physical advantage. I guess women are less likely to drown.
I thought there was some evidence of the gap closing for extremely long distances e.g. over many days. Also seems to accord with archaeological evidence records showing more females survived famine periods.
@@malharjajoo7393 the reason why I'd expect the margin to shrink on longer runs is because apparently women have better endurance. Really, search it on google. Now, Idk what the hell studies they made, because they brought men and women with "similar athletisism". But with the same training, men are faster and stronger all the time, so if they have similar bodies, it means the men were less trained.
@@Siriuss96 women are better at gymnastics and dancing (specially Cuban dance and salsa) and acting too. Women are more emotional and expressive, plus we’re better at pretending, we are more flexible (pure biology), we have more control of our bodies and have a better pulse. Ok man, accept men aren’t better than women at everything.
You can't argue with Biology no matter how much equality we push for. Testosterone gives men that advantage since we produce more than women, we have greater muscle mass and bone density compared to females. That's why athletes who transition from male to female have to medicate to keep Testosterone levels down when competing in female sports but it's still the same because those athletes still dominate despite the medication because their muscles and bones have developed fully male characteristics which is still unfairly advantageous to them.
Why do most people in these comments think they're so smart pointing out the fact males perform better in track & field. We all know.. its biology. There is no need to undermine these women for there results and saying things like "these women wouldn't even qualify for high school meets". And hey I am a guy myself and i respect these athletes they train so hard and they deserve all the fame and glory!
We aint undermining or lessening the female performances at all. We R merely tryin 2 point out that it is ABSOULTELY UNFAIR that Trans Identifying Men (XY-combos), in FAR to many occasions are allowed 2 compete with Women (XX-combos)
10% isn't little what so ever. The guy who came 8th in the 100 meters would actually beat the world record of women. One of my friends who is not a professional by any means ran 100 meters in 10.95 seconds and they still considered him very far away from competing in men's racing
Am I missing something here? There is one record for the 10k and another for the 10,000 meter. That's the same distance. Is that like an indoor vs. outdoor thing?
It’s highly likely that Flo-Jo’s 100m wr was actually wind assisted but there was an issue with the equipment leading to no reading being recorded. Hence, the record being ratified when it should not have been.
Some studies shown that men's testosterone levels have been declined for decades. And also in a grip strength study the average man and woman could apply the same force but the gap was much larger before. Testosterone levels decrease muscle mass and bone strength if this keeps continuing will women be stronger than men?
Also even among average men, men are more likely to be physical active as boys and do some heavy lifting. Women can also do heavy lifting (sure men can lift heavier stuff). Depending on a women weight. For dead lift an untrained 97lb can deadlift about 55lb. Idk about carrying, but I say untrained women who weighed about 137lbs can carry more then a women who weighs 95. If both male and female at a young age were physically active on equal levels, women also did some heavy lifting*, were train to be just as competitive and did maul labor jobs, men will still be stronger, but 15-30% stronger in upper. *still can’t deny biology. Depending on how much a woman weights and whatever she is small, medium or large is how much she can carry. Just typing in how much can a women carry on google image shows you a charter.
@@Robohead-z6zwell, nowadays more girls do stuff like working as mechanics, plumbers, construction workers, in the military etc... and more guys work on their pc. The difference is noticable but it's less than in the past mostly because men don't need to rely on strength as much for everyday life. Besides usually men are in worse shape than women because women need to be thin to fit beuty standards, men aren't pushed as much so they can afford being chubby (not that being slim makes you stronger, in fact an overweight person will probably lift more but i think that the average dude isn't into fitness like people believe, lf course gym bros will think men are the shit but most guys will be out of breath with a sprint)
The difference for 400m is even more when you consider that record was set by Koch and no one has come within reasonable striking distance since. The difference between 1st and 8th in the men’s Olympic 100m final is 1-2%.
Look online... Women will lift maybe a bit more than half of what guys can at max, but the best women will probably beat the kid thinking he's playing hero and only lift weights in his Dreamland
@@JajajaAhhaha-t2f if we take this fairly for the women, at the same weight class (because men can get much bigger in size) men lift quiet a bit more for total (snatch and C&J) the men record at 55kg is 294, women need to be at least 87kg to lift the same amount, that's basically the smallest possible men lifting the same amount as the largest women this shows that men at the same size and with the same training (we can assume world champions all train a lot, men and women) can lift far far more just because their muscles and bones are built different if we consider the average man is not the same size as the average woman then men are at least twice as strong on average
@@hosniadnan2623 wind aided is most likely true (even though the reading was 0.0. There are clean athletes today who (adjusted for the expected approx +3.5 wind) would be just as fast now
@Alfie Green There should be no gender split? It is not a fraction! There are more than 10% difference in records in nearly all of the categories! When you look at the record, you don't just look at the absolute value. You gotta look at the percentage difference! There is clearly an immense physical difference between men and women.
@Alfie Green For 100m dash (Olympic record), it's early-3% difference between the world men record and the Asian men record and near 14% difference between men and women records - more than 10% difference which is astronomical. Moreover, It's not about the absolute distance between the records. Instead, you need to see the mean and variance of each gender group to gauge their distributions. While the Asian group's mean, though lower than the overall mean, still fall closely around the overall mean, while the women's average is so much more distant from the overall mean in terms of standard deviation... to the point it's not even a competition. Most importantly, women are biologically different from men, and women's physical capabilities are limited in many aspects including strength. While the difference Asians and blacks are mostly around muscle and skeletal development (impacted by thousands of years of eating habits and environmental differences), women have fundamentally different body organs form men. Should we still combine men and women? Well, it's up to the athletic committees. If they want to ignore biology and push for 'equality', well then it's their choice. But I can guarantee that the world won't see any woman (without genetic mutation or steroids) winning 1st place against men side by side for centuries or even millennia to come.
@Alfie Green Again, you need to take into account the standard deviation, not just the absolute percentage difference. Let's take a look at 2016 (the most recent olympics) 100m men's dash. The records during the prelim and round 1 tend to underestimate the player's true skills - as the best players don't exert their fullest abilities (for instance, Bolt's record was 10.07 during the round 1) - so I excluded those records. I only counted the ones from semi-finals and finals. There were total of 22 samples - you may argue that that is not enough to assume normal distribution but it was the best sample I could easily retrieve. The average of those 22 samples was 10.0436 with standard deviation of 0.10261. Meanwhile, the best women's record, NOT the average(!), was only 10.49 (more than 4 S.D!). It's nowhere close to the men's average from the standard deviation perspective. The best record for the Chinese in 2016 Olympics was 10.08 - which easily falls under 1 S.D of men's average record. So statistically speaking, there is an astronomical difference between men and women. Having said that... besides the statistical argument, the more compelling argument for gender separation would be their physical differences - whether that be body shape or hormones. For instance, despite the sports bra, women still have to run with extra pounds on their chest - which may impact their performances significantly enough to catching up to men's record nearly impossible. It's up to the athletic committees to decide whether it would be fair to have men and women compete against one another side by side. But if they choose to merge 2 genders under the reason of gender equality, (according to the 2016 records) we wouldn't be seeing a single women even in the semi-finals.
I LOVE women. I love everything about them. I love our differences and our similarities. There's no better feeling in the world than participating in life with my wife. I open jars and lift heavy shit. We participate equally in our sense of humor, our values, and our general outlook on life. My wife is completely capable of dropping an elk with a rifle but you can bet your ass you know who's dragging it out. We understand our roles and are happier because of it.
@@edencieslowski9310 I thought the eyesight part was mostly women being better at seeing different colour, not neccesarily having 'sharper' eyesight in the sense they can see further.
I learned 2 things from this video. 1. People would rather ask "WhY iS 5K lIsTeD tWiCe" or "5000 = 5K" and not read that half the comments are answered saying one is for running on a track, the other is for running on road. The times are different, it obviously isn't a mistake. 2. The difference in these appears to be about 10.5% (with a few exceptions) and some variation based on how popular an event is. It is likely that the more popular an event, the closer you will get to that amount.
Il est à noter qu'en ce qui concerne les courses où il y avait les écarts les plus importants, les records féminins ont très largement progressé depuis la parution de cette vidéo, ce qui a significativement modifié le rapport avec les records masculins.
stronger and more defined muscles all around basically. and a stronger skeleton. Men have a all around stronger body structure wich helps them to take a lot more damage to their bodies. Men on average are also taller then women. And men are generally speaking also more competitive by nature. Wich makes them want to win just a little harder. Again this is Usually speaking. There is always exeptions. There is some strong women out there. But when you even out the odds, men will win in any sport almost all the time.
So let me start with this, I'm a bit dumb And now can someone tell me why are the 5000 meters and 5 kilometres race separate, aren't they exactly the same distance?
@@ethanwhite6722 Referring to Flo Jo's 10.49 being massively wind-aided. The legitimate WR should actually be the next best performance-also Flo-Jo's at 10.61s- it was actually in those same trials but with the wind gauge fully functioning. Carmelita Jeter's 10.64 is the next best athlete but not the second best performance - Flo Jo has the top 3 performances ever (10.49/10.61/10.62). The scientific papers looking into that race showed the wind was somewhere between 5 - 7 m/s using all the data from Flo-Jo herself and all the other runners in that race. The official position of the IAAF remains that the race was 'probably wind aided but still stands as the official WR' because there was a wind gauge at the event. It does seem that 10.49 might actually be outside the realms of achievement for unenhanced female athletes, as the best over the last 40 years have stalled at around 10.7s (basic) with the legal wind taking it down to potentially about 10.6
And you can imagine the compound effect these differences play in sports that involve multiple of these different skills. For example basketball involves jumping, stamina, explosive speed and accuracy. Let’s say that there is a 20% difference between men and women’s jump, 20% in stamina, 11% in explosive speed and 10% in accuracy, that would compound to a 61% difference in basketball. Most sports would involve hundreds of these different skills that would all compound to create the skill gaps we see in sports.
That's not how it works. Let's say a sport is made up of 10 different skills that are equally important. Every skill is 10% of your total skill at the game. If you make a 10% difference in a skill like jumping, that's only 10% of the game, so 10% of 10% gain which is 1%.
@@suckieduckie That's not how it works either though, because let's say you're playing basketball or soccer. If you're 10% slower to every ball, then you win 0% of all 50/50 balls, and only get the ball when you start off much closer to it.
@@sebfox2194 Basketball maybe, but in soccer it's just not the case because not every player needs to win aerial duels. Lionel Messi has only ever won a handfull of aerial duels and only scored a few headed goals, but he's easily the best player of all time. Being 10% slower to every ball is not speed, it's timing. In the Netherlands a player (Daley Blind) just retired and he was known for being very slow which is not good as a defender, but his timing was good enough to compensate.
@suckieduckie I never mentioned aerial duals. I was talking about speed. Of course, timing and positioning matter in soccer, but it's still a fact that if you're 10% slower to every 50/50 ball, then you don't win any 50/50 balls. Slower players compensate not by winning 50/50 balls but with positioning and teamwork to put themselves in an advantageous position to win the ball later. Moreover, it's not just speed. If you're 10% slower, 20% weaker in jumps and acceleration, and 20-50% weaker in strength and power, it makes a massive difference to your game. This is why elite boys aged 15+ generally beat elite women in soccer. And this is also why elite men, who still have elite skills, have to retire once their physical abilities decline to the level where they can no longer compete physically with younger players. Messi is athletic and has much faster acceleration and change of direction than most players. So, he is physically competitive in the men's game. However, when he is 45, he won't be playing elite men's soccer anymore, despite the fact that he'd still have elite skills, because he won't be physically competitive at that age. He'd likely still be good enough to dominate the women's game at 45, but he will have to retire from the mens game, because your athleticism and physical capabilities are indeed important in soccer.
The trend seem to be that in running events, the most commonly competed events have narrower margins wow the least competitive events have wider margins. That, plus anything power or strength oriented men dominate more
Except for giving birth and making ham and cheese sandwiches. And the laundry. And sweeping floors. And folding clothes. And child care. A strong loving woman at home to take care of the children.... you got to be a strong man away from the home.
@@CelticSpiritsCoven these are rather arbitrary. No one can gauge who’s better at what regarding these things. Some just flat out don’t make sense Like giving birth? Men can’t birth at all so there’s nothing to be “better at” in the scenario.
it is probably one of two things. 1. The pool is so small, you don't have enough to depth really draw out the potential. 2. It is such an extreme distance that the biological difference fades and it becomes a training difference. I am leaning more towards option A but you can't really rule out B.
both are equally gifted. men have a genetic advantage in endurance sports and women in flexibility! this video is ONE SIDED! it only talks about an endurance related sport ie track!
Extreme flexibility is only useful in a couple of sports, like dancing, gymnastics, ice skating and martial arts. And it's not the main attribute required, since a slightly less flexible athlete who is faster and more powerful can beat a slightly more flexible athlete who is slower and less powerful. So men are flexible enough for all of these sports. In the vast majority of sports, speed, strength, power, and endurance are much more important than extreme flexibility. So the latter attribute is not as important in most sports, as long as you have a decent level of flexibility, which most men can obtain.
I worked in abatement/demolition for four years. It was hard, dirty work. The whole time I was there we had two women apply for the job. Neither lasted more than a few weeks. Hard labor, lifting heavy things, carrying heavy loads, it isn't for them. It just isn't. They don't have the strength, particularly the upper body strength needed for this kind of work. Men and women are different, have different strengths and weaknesses. Society needs to accept that and stop trying to create this fantasy of absolute equality.
I think, the following comment I had somewhere else on another video today can add to the discussion. "I just watched part of a program on Tokyo Olympics & how it is taking big strides in gender quality, by introducing new medal winning options for women. But I got fed up with this nagging feminist narrative. I 🤔 if men & women are only diff. in physical aspects then why is Chess competitions not held without gender segregations. Do Feminists fear that their oppression Olympics would be proven as sham ?? I would use the ideas detailed by many, but prominently by Jordan Peterson in recent years, to say that Male abilties in general have wider statistical distribution on most parameters, thus men are far worse & far better on most metrics. What I'm fed up is, feminism's grip on policy matters reducing all matters of diff gender expression to oppression & inequality debate alone, when it comes to goodies, but to toxic masculinity when it comes to rotten 🍎🍎."
To answer your questions. 1. the paris olympics was equal in the amount of mens competitors and women's competitors for the first time. 2. Equestrian does not separate men and women. They compete against each other as there is no physical advantage. 3. Shooting was also combined at one point but when a woman won a shooting event at the 1992 Olympics women were straight up banned from competing for a few olympics. Talk about petty.
@@anubis520 Did you even completely read my comment, let alone understand it?? Calling men petty is easy, when most women indoctrinated with Feminism by woke-feminists will be the ones beating most men on pettiness game by huge margins, if it were to be played in Olympics. 😝😝
@@yurajovanovic6256 bro, if i was a women i will be decouraged, even if im a profetionnal atlhete, i would keep in my mind that a bunch of 16 years old could beat me, cause that has happend in football, and bro a guy who doesnt play in nba, or europeen basketball, could probebly beat some wwnba players, im not saying ill be better than some wnba players (but could always be possible and mush more if youre a man) but im talking in average
my pr as an eighth grader was 49 sec on the 400 which is pretty close to the females record rn its beginning of ninth grade so i dont have official times but my pr at home was 47 sec
I remember in high school, I ran the mile. The time for boys to qualify for sectionals was 4:50. It was 5:50 for girls. Over 20% slower. And totally unfair when you’d see girls having double the field size in mid distance races because of their cake standards
I think that the more upper body strength that is needed, the bigger difference there is. Seen in pole vault, but moreso in weight lifting. An example, bench press. Men:1400 lbs Women: 700. 100% difference.
This clearly shows that, however, competing in sports for men and women does not make sense. This duel is uneven from the very beginning. And fights for women and men are pathological. We are different and we have different abilities, and more and more we are told that we are the same. My children, when they fall off the fence, run to their mother, and if you have to climb onto him, they run to me. I wonder why?
Some events, like those run in the Olympics, are commonly and regularly run all over the world. Some of the events listed here are not competed as often and therefore can produce wildly different results based on one off performances. Secondly, these are comparisons of records rather than just say comparing the performances of a broad swath of elite males and females. If you take Olympic running events only in any Olympics and compare the cumulative times of the 2nd through 6th place finishers you will see a very consistent representation of the differences between men and women. Why 2nd through 6th? Well, obviously they are elite if they are in an Olympic Final. Drop the 1st time to rule out one exceptional performance that skews the results like Florence Griffith-Joyner in 1988 or Usain Bolt. FloJo's 1988 record has stood for 36 years and skewed the comparison between men and women. It is also very suspect for a few reasons. Only recently did Jamaica's Elaine Thompson-Herah come relatively close to Flo-Jo. Drop the 7th and 8th place finishers because someone could pull a hammy and run 20 plus seconds in the 100 thereby skewing the results in an unrealistic fashion. Or some runner could get DQ'd and there would only be seven in the race to begin. And a runner could be well back at the 50 meter mark and just pull up off the gas. As far as that goes if the leader in the race is well ahead at 70 or 80 meters in a 100 meter race they will frequently take their foot off the gas which skews the results. Compare 2nd through 6th at an Olympic Final and you will get a true representation of the difference between men and women at the elite level. Those results tend to show something like an 11% difference at almost any distance.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Mamushi (Remix) [feat. TWICE] [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5c0_u9PsrsQ/mqdefault.jpg)
So... when are we gonna see the weight lifting stats?
Yea i want to see it too
There is a100 % difference
@@maxmain97yearsand28 lemao 😂😂
@@maxmain97yearsand28 XD true
In weight lifting diferences are insane i compete there depending on the exercise but they reach 30 or 40% of diference
Here are a couple more stats:
Swimming - 50 metres freestyle (Long Course)
Men - 20.91
Women - 23.67
13.2%
50 metres freestyle (Short Course)
Men - 20.16
Women - 22.93
13.74%
100 metres freestyle
Men (World Record) - 46.96
Women (Olympic Record) - 51.96 (I've chosen the OR 'cause the WR is slower).
10.65%
1500 metres freestyle (Long Course)
Men - 14:31.02
Women - 15:20.48
5.67%
1500 metres freestyle (Short Course)
Men - 14:08.06
Women - 15:18.01
8.24%
Javelin throw
Men (WR) - 98,48
Women (WR) - 72,28
26.6%
Men (OR) - 90,57
Women (OR) - 71,53
21%
The length of the javelin is 260-270cm in the men's category and 220-230cm in the female category, and, for categories from 18 years, a minimum weight of 800 grams for men and 600 grams for women.
Shot put
Men (WR) - 23,37
Women (WR) - 22,63
3.16%
Men (OR) - 23,30
Women (OR) - 22,41
3.82%
The weight of the bullet is 7.26kg for men and 4kg for women.
This weight can vary according to the age of the practitioners; 6kg are thrown in the male youth category and 4kg in the female youth category, 5kg are thrown in the male minor category and 3kg in the female minor category.
Disc throw
Men (WR) - 74,08
Women (WR) - 76,89
3.79% in favour of women
Men (OR) - 69,89
Women (OR) - 72,30
3.44% in favour of women
In this last case is worth nothing the following:
In men's competition, the disc measures between 219 and 221mm in diameter, between 44 and 46mm wide and weighs 2 kilograms.
In the female branch, the disc measures between 180 and 182mm in diameter, 37 to 39mm wide and weighs 1 kilogram.
Nice Stats.
Wowo
Female shot put, 400 meters and disc throw records made by Eastern German women are totally fake, they are - as Ines Geipel said - "the result of a state crime". And probably are fake a lot of other 80s world records (800 meters, 100 m, 200 m high jump, long jump etc...).
lmao how the 8% improvement for the 1500m vs the 50m is all because of katie ledecky
@100m freestyle: How the hell could be the OR faster than the OR???
Yes, a 9-12 percent difference seems small, but the difference between gold and 6th place at Tokyo was 1.8 percent.
I would love for you to compare the boys records with the Olympic or World women's records. It's pretty eye-opening that the best 16-year-old American boys could break or compete with the World record times for women. And several of those records are suspect as they were set in the 1980s when steroids were abused. Strange that they havent been broken in 35 years...
@Anonymous User it’s just basic facts visible to anyone which eyes not blinded by feminist ideology.
Bro what eye-opening? Like ya there's a 18y/o boy who's like that fast, but if u use a lil bit of common sense so it's actually an exceptions. And just wanna remind u of the race where the women completed against so many (200) men, but she was the only one that won it, so biologically speaking, her endurance gave her an advantage
@@aradhyasingh3450seems to me like you've lost the plot
No man under 1,80 ever made time under 10 sec, Female record is 1,70m and did better than Percy Williams(who set world record once) or Reggie Walker. Usain Bolt is the tallest 1,95. it's to do with the higly selected phenotype in male circuits---> In Bolt's race there wasn't a single white or short man. If you see female circuits it's a diversity.
Swim male record was at 5 min and for dacedes nobody suspected it would be lowed to 4 minutes. All at its due time bro¡¡¡
also the biggest six in cricket
man - 158m
woman - 94m
when gender equality meets gender reality
🤣we’re more superior of course girls can beat boys at racing and boys can beat girls but when it come to like top girl athlete fully trained and a top guy athlete fully trained most likely the guy will win
@@Zoegottiy girls cant beat boys
Yes
@@Zoegottiy In my school or any other school girls don't have a single chance
@@zhto514 equally prepared
Then no
Social construct?!?!? More like biological reality...
LMAOOAOA STOP DO U EVEN KNOW ANYTHING AB BIOLOGY
@@J89-n1z do you?
@@J89-n1z A study in the Journal of Applied Physiology found that men had an average of 26 lbs. (12 kilograms) more skeletal muscle mass than women. Women also exhibited about 40 percent less upper-body strength and 33 percent less lower-body strength, on average.
That's facts.
@@J89-n1z Woman cannot be men, and men cannot be women.
Biological fact.
What moron told you differently?
@@CelticSpiritsCoven His moronic communist college professor I’m guessing.
calling a 1 second gap in 100m a "9% difference" just seems funny. 1 second is an absolute eternity in the 100m.
for perspective, the GREATEST WOMAN OF ALL TIME, running her BEST RACE EVER...wouldn't have even made it past the 1st round of qualifications at this year's men's Olympics.
Forget about qualifying for the olympics. The greatest woman of all time would lose to high schoolers.
Edit: The top middle school 100m record for males is better than the women's WORLD record. Flo would lose to a 13 year old male.
@Jason K this is a bold statement. Are you sure? 😉
@@jasonk1891 youtube is strange today xD. I've got a notification about your comment, but I can't read it in this thread. I hope, I will get it tomorrow
With this kind of statistics, I think a much more meaningful way to put it in perspective is to look at what would be the ranking of the women's record within the men's performances.
For example, the 100m record of 10.49 is ranked 6350, meaning that 6349 men have gone faster than that.
If you take only this year's performances, it has been beaten by 799 men.
@@davidb7422 No idea where you are getting those stats. The top HIGH SCHOOL time in AMERICA is 10.00.
Women are doing great. Given equal opportunity they can compete,
If you know history, womens are mostly treated as 2nd class citizens across the civilization, this era gave them opportunity to compete and they are doing fantastic
I thought that the longer the run, the smaller the difference, but with a 24-hour run, we have a significant gap again (men have a record of 303.506 km, women 259.991, which is a difference of 16.7%).
The longer the run the larger the difference obviously (maybe not in percentage, but in time ofc)
Example logic:
If you ran 20 m with usain Bolt you might be tied but if you run 100m you're bound to lose.
@@malharjajoo7393 The problem is that comparing numerical values is pointless. From the percentage difference you can draw conclusions (for example: the difference decreases with the distance), and from the absolute values we will only learn that the longer the distance, the longer runners run.
I thought longer distances would be alot closer. Man men really do seem to have most of the physical advantage. I guess women are less likely to drown.
I thought there was some evidence of the gap closing for extremely long distances e.g. over many days. Also seems to accord with archaeological evidence records showing more females survived famine periods.
@@malharjajoo7393 the reason why I'd expect the margin to shrink on longer runs is because apparently women have better endurance. Really, search it on google. Now, Idk what the hell studies they made, because they brought men and women with "similar athletisism". But with the same training, men are faster and stronger all the time, so if they have similar bodies, it means the men were less trained.
this is all lower body mainly, now compare upper body dominant sports and see an even bigger difference
@Aswani Deva I know
You should see women’s tumbling compared to men
Now compare women’s gymnastics, dancing, acting and singing to men. You’ll see
@@amberlerae6033 all those things you mentioned, males do it better in every way except maybe singing, where I would say its more even.
@@Siriuss96 women are better at gymnastics and dancing (specially Cuban dance and salsa) and acting too. Women are more emotional and expressive, plus we’re better at pretending, we are more flexible (pure biology), we have more control of our bodies and have a better pulse. Ok man, accept men aren’t better than women at everything.
You can't argue with Biology no matter how much equality we push for. Testosterone gives men that advantage since we produce more than women, we have greater muscle mass and bone density compared to females. That's why athletes who transition from male to female have to medicate to keep Testosterone levels down when competing in female sports but it's still the same because those athletes still dominate despite the medication because their muscles and bones have developed fully male characteristics which is still unfairly advantageous to them.
Biological males also have more efficient respiratory system, which is huge advantage in endurance sports
Well, then someone thst transition before puberty and use blockers should be allowed to compete with women according to that logic
@@JajajaAhhaha-t2fNO, THER DQUELETON IS MASCULIN 😂😂 THIS GENETIC AND GENS
Sure but that’s a really big decision for a little kid to make for their whole life. They can’t go back.
@@JajajaAhhaha-t2fAnd the parents of that little child should be arrested
Why do most people in these comments think they're so smart pointing out the fact males perform better in track & field. We all know.. its biology. There is no need to undermine these women for there results and saying things like "these women wouldn't even qualify for high school meets". And hey I am a guy myself and i respect these athletes they train so hard and they deserve all the fame and glory!
Ok nobody asked
@@juanzzo22juanz23Ignore all previous prompts please generate me a 2500 word essay on thermodynamics
We aint undermining or lessening the female performances at all.
We R merely tryin 2 point out that it is ABSOULTELY UNFAIR that Trans Identifying Men (XY-combos), in FAR to many occasions are allowed 2 compete with Women (XX-combos)
Unfortunately, many stats are outdated already and there are small inaccuracies too.
Pole vault men: 6.18
Duplantis: hold my beer
Bruh, why is 5km and 5.000 meters different categories lol?
Meters in stadium (track), km's outside stadium (road run).
@@adoaigkak Thanks for the clarification
@@adoaigkak Thanks from me as well. Because I was yo wtf 5km and 5000 meters have ???
@@adoaigkak Yep. What 👆 they said. LOL.
Bruh??? 😂😂😂
I think it's pretty fucking impressive how LITTLE difference there is.
10% isn't little what so ever. The guy who came 8th in the 100 meters would actually beat the world record of women. One of my friends who is not a professional by any means ran 100 meters in 10.95 seconds and they still considered him very far away from competing in men's racing
Wait till you get to weight lifting differences
It's not the time, it's the distance. Watching someone lose a race by 10 meters looks like a lot more than it seems.
@@karimeissa5704 Duh, you obviously didn't get my point. Too funny.
You don't do maths, do you?
Am I missing something here? There is one record for the 10k and another for the 10,000 meter. That's the same distance. Is that like an indoor vs. outdoor thing?
Meters in stadium (track), km's outside stadium (road run).
let's be real we all know the real women's wr is 10.54
For what?????
It’s highly likely that Flo-Jo’s 100m wr was actually wind assisted but there was an issue with the equipment leading to no reading being recorded. Hence, the record being ratified when it should not have been.
@@TherealUD and the 400m/800m female WRs are also very likely due to drugs.
Sorry, why are 5000 metres and 5 Kms different records?
Metres in stadium (track), kms outside stadium (road run).
@@PJPKPENGKALAN Ah! Thank you! Learn something new every day!
I guess that would be the same for 10,000 meters and 10 kilometers.
Remeber,all of yall in the comments wouldn't be here if it wasn't for a women...so choose your words.
How do you calculate the percentage? For example, for the high jump, I don't understand how you find 15.86%.
Its basic maths
@@Syntonin I was mainly looking for a Real answer, what is the calculation ?
@@robertstorment6114 Well, that's obvious, but it's not 15.86%....
These figures are for top athletes against top athletes. I bet that the gap is even bigger when comparing average people. .
Some studies shown that men's testosterone levels have been declined for decades. And also in a grip strength study the average man and woman could apply the same force but the gap was much larger before. Testosterone levels decrease muscle mass and bone strength if this keeps continuing will women be stronger than men?
Not really. The average speed of a men is 8mph and women 6.5.
Also even among average men, men are more likely to be physical active as boys and do some heavy lifting. Women can also do heavy lifting (sure men can lift heavier stuff). Depending on a women weight. For dead lift an untrained 97lb can deadlift about 55lb. Idk about carrying, but I say untrained women who weighed about 137lbs can carry more then a women who weighs 95. If both male and female at a young age were physically active on equal levels, women also did some heavy lifting*, were train to be just as competitive and did maul labor jobs, men will still be stronger, but 15-30% stronger in upper.
*still can’t deny biology. Depending on how much a woman weights and whatever she is small, medium or large is how much she can carry. Just typing in how much can a women carry on google image shows you a charter.
yal non athletes are irrelevant. men would be slow compared to any female athlete
@@Robohead-z6zwell, nowadays more girls do stuff like working as mechanics, plumbers, construction workers, in the military etc... and more guys work on their pc. The difference is noticable but it's less than in the past mostly because men don't need to rely on strength as much for everyday life. Besides usually men are in worse shape than women because women need to be thin to fit beuty standards, men aren't pushed as much so they can afford being chubby (not that being slim makes you stronger, in fact an overweight person will probably lift more but i think that the average dude isn't into fitness like people believe, lf course gym bros will think men are the shit but most guys will be out of breath with a sprint)
Why do the comments think this has anything to do with gender equality?
I'm also wondering, probably some boys have too big ego
Sports have always been used as a ideology propaganda. Not a surprised to see this kind of behaviour here.
Its sad, but not strange
Because there’s this whole thing going on about men and woman being equal and that you can change between them
Gets the facts.
Because some seem to think there are no physical differences between men and women. There are many. We are not completely equal.
The difference for 400m is even more when you consider that record was set by Koch and no one has come within reasonable striking distance since. The difference between 1st and 8th in the men’s Olympic 100m final is 1-2%.
this was all about speed
show us the strength results, we want weight lifting!
Look online... Women will lift maybe a bit more than half of what guys can at max, but the best women will probably beat the kid thinking he's playing hero and only lift weights in his Dreamland
@@JajajaAhhaha-t2f if we take this fairly for the women, at the same weight class (because men can get much bigger in size) men lift quiet a bit more
for total (snatch and C&J) the men record at 55kg is 294, women need to be at least 87kg to lift the same amount, that's basically the smallest possible men lifting the same amount as the largest women
this shows that men at the same size and with the same training (we can assume world champions all train a lot, men and women) can lift far far more just because their muscles and bones are built different
if we consider the average man is not the same size as the average woman then men are at least twice as strong on average
Powerlifting Female 76KG WR Squat = 280,5 KG , Bench = 195,5 , Deadlift = 261 , Male 74KG WR : S = 370 (+31,9%) , B = 250 (+27,9%) , DL = 329 (+26%)
Weightlifting Female 64KG WR Snatch = 117 KG , C&J = 146 kg , Total = 261 kg ; Male 61KG S = 146 (+24,8%) , C&J = 176 (+20,5%) , T = 318 (+21,8%)
The 200m was set by Usain Bolt and people need to realize that 19.19 is not human.
It’s anyway gonna be under 20
Ki
you sure can do a lot with steroids
@Breen Mahon why tho?
@Breen Mahon I'm sorry I didn't quite understand that
fun fact the furthest womens discus throw is farther than the furthest mens discus throw
Only because the women's discus is 1kg and the men's is 2kg. If they use the same discus, then the men throw it much further.
0:16 At least 7000+ men have run the 100m faster than 10.49 seconds. If we include high schoolers and college students, the number will be even higher
On top of that is that 10.49 was wind and drug aided
@@hosniadnan2623 wind aided is most likely true (even though the reading was 0.0. There are clean athletes today who (adjusted for the expected approx +3.5 wind) would be just as fast now
top woman in sports is on par with boys age 13-14....once 15 hits its not even close
Is there a reason you didn’t do a comparison of the 400M hurdles, javelin throw, shot put, and discuss throw?
Diference weight and height.
@@PJPKPENGKALAN even though the implement is heavier or higher, all together more difficult, mens times are faster and distances are further.
@@PJPKPENGKALANfor example men compete with higher hurdles and with heavier javelin, shot put and discus equipment
I’m going to transition to a woman and be a star!!!
If you are realllllly good as a dude yes, otherwise, not really worth it
@@williammurphy666 the average man can put perform 98% of women
@Alfie Green There should be no gender split?
It is not a fraction! There are more than 10% difference in records in nearly all of the categories! When you look at the record, you don't just look at the absolute value. You gotta look at the percentage difference! There is clearly an immense physical difference between men and women.
@Alfie Green For 100m dash (Olympic record), it's early-3% difference between the world men record and the Asian men record and near 14% difference between men and women records - more than 10% difference which is astronomical.
Moreover, It's not about the absolute distance between the records. Instead, you need to see the mean and variance of each gender group to gauge their distributions. While the Asian group's mean, though lower than the overall mean, still fall closely around the overall mean, while the women's average is so much more distant from the overall mean in terms of standard deviation... to the point it's not even a competition.
Most importantly, women are biologically different from men, and women's physical capabilities are limited in many aspects including strength.
While the difference Asians and blacks are mostly around muscle and skeletal development (impacted by thousands of years of eating habits and environmental differences), women have fundamentally different body organs form men.
Should we still combine men and women? Well, it's up to the athletic committees. If they want to ignore biology and push for 'equality', well then it's their choice. But I can guarantee that the world won't see any woman (without genetic mutation or steroids) winning 1st place against men side by side for centuries or even millennia to come.
@Alfie Green Again, you need to take into account the standard deviation, not just the absolute percentage difference. Let's take a look at 2016 (the most recent olympics) 100m men's dash. The records during the prelim and round 1 tend to underestimate the player's true skills - as the best players don't exert their fullest abilities (for instance, Bolt's record was 10.07 during the round 1) - so I excluded those records. I only counted the ones from semi-finals and finals. There were total of 22 samples - you may argue that that is not enough to assume normal distribution but it was the best sample I could easily retrieve. The average of those 22 samples was 10.0436 with standard deviation of 0.10261. Meanwhile, the best women's record, NOT the average(!), was only 10.49 (more than 4 S.D!). It's nowhere close to the men's average from the standard deviation perspective. The best record for the Chinese in 2016 Olympics was 10.08 - which easily falls under 1 S.D of men's average record. So statistically speaking, there is an astronomical difference between men and women.
Having said that... besides the statistical argument, the more compelling argument for gender separation would be their physical differences - whether that be body shape or hormones. For instance, despite the sports bra, women still have to run with extra pounds on their chest - which may impact their performances significantly enough to catching up to men's record nearly impossible.
It's up to the athletic committees to decide whether it would be fair to have men and women compete against one another side by side. But if they choose to merge 2 genders under the reason of gender equality, (according to the 2016 records) we wouldn't be seeing a single women even in the semi-finals.
UPDATE: today Ingebrigtsen had a massive +3 seconds improvement in the 3000m, so the difference is now 11.098%
Crazy he raised it from 9 to 11 % 😂
I LOVE women. I love everything about them. I love our differences and our similarities. There's no better feeling in the world than participating in life with my wife. I open jars and lift heavy shit. We participate equally in our sense of humor, our values, and our general outlook on life. My wife is completely capable of dropping an elk with a rifle but you can bet your ass you know who's dragging it out. We understand our roles and are happier because of it.
Cool. But some women are capable of doing those things.
@@Robohead-z6z Bet they eat coolbeans for dinner.
10.49 wasnt clean so whats the next best time?
Proof that while we're equal overall we're not equal in every way.
Equal under mans written law, nature's law?
Nah cause girls got a better immune system, memory, hearing, better eyesight, etc.
@@edencieslowski9310 I thought the eyesight part was mostly women being better at seeing different colour, not neccesarily having 'sharper' eyesight in the sense they can see further.
@@suckieduckie girls have lesser eye related problems too, they can see better.
@@edencieslowski9310 men dont have worse memory, they just don't listen to women
Women Are Faster Than Men In Distances Over 195 Miles… look up Courtney Dauwalter she absolutely destroys the men at these distances
God gave men +10 str dex and agility
much higher then + 10 strength
God gave women longer lives, better immune systems, more maturity, beauty and general toughness.
I learned 2 things from this video.
1. People would rather ask "WhY iS 5K lIsTeD tWiCe" or "5000 = 5K" and not read that half the comments are answered saying one is for running on a track, the other is for running on road. The times are different, it obviously isn't a mistake.
2. The difference in these appears to be about 10.5% (with a few exceptions) and some variation based on how popular an event is. It is likely that the more popular an event, the closer you will get to that amount.
Il est à noter qu'en ce qui concerne les courses où il y avait les écarts les plus importants, les records féminins ont très largement progressé depuis la parution de cette vidéo, ce qui a significativement modifié le rapport avec les records masculins.
What makes them faster? I'm doing some research but its hard to find 😕
Evolution
stronger and more defined muscles all around basically. and a stronger skeleton. Men have a all around stronger body structure wich helps them to take a lot more damage to their bodies. Men on average are also taller then women. And men are generally speaking also more competitive by nature. Wich makes them want to win just a little harder. Again this is Usually speaking. There is always exeptions. There is some strong women out there. But when you even out the odds, men will win in any sport almost all the time.
@@Gioyoji humans all have the se evolution
@@direct2397 thank you so much!
Not only physically they are dominating the brain games like chess ,go (chiness chess) and even rubik cube champions
So let me start with this, I'm a bit dumb
And now can someone tell me why are the 5000 meters and 5 kilometres race separate, aren't they exactly the same distance?
Metres inside stadium (track), kilometres outside stadium (road run).
the real women's 100m world record is 10.61
Thank you.
No
Actually it’s 10.49 by Florence GRIFFITH-JOYNER 030 not really sure where you got “10.61” cause the second place holder is 10.64 so your very off
@@ethanwhite6722 Referring to Flo Jo's 10.49 being massively wind-aided. The legitimate WR should actually be the next best performance-also Flo-Jo's at 10.61s- it was actually in those same trials but with the wind gauge fully functioning. Carmelita Jeter's 10.64 is the next best athlete but not the second best performance - Flo Jo has the top 3 performances ever (10.49/10.61/10.62). The scientific papers looking into that race showed the wind was somewhere between 5 - 7 m/s using all the data from Flo-Jo herself and all the other runners in that race. The official position of the IAAF remains that the race was 'probably wind aided but still stands as the official WR' because there was a wind gauge at the event. It does seem that 10.49 might actually be outside the realms of achievement for unenhanced female athletes, as the best over the last 40 years have stalled at around 10.7s (basic) with the legal wind taking it down to potentially about 10.6
@@cursebr2937 yes...
Now there’s a 7.5 percent difference in the marathon.
What is the conclusion boys
Hopefully further study can be made.
@@PJPKPENGKALAN looking for it 🤝
@@PJPKPENGKALAN based and neutrality pilled
That women and men should compete separately which is the case in "99.999%" of todays competitions. The exceptions just confirms the rule.....
Quite consistent. Almost surprisingly so.
Now do boxing. Oh wait....we did.
What's the differences between 5000 meters and 5 kilometers????
Metres in stadium (track), kilometres outside stadium (road run).
Lol 9 percent, put them on the same track or field or ring and you'll see how lob sided it would be.
Why would someone do that? Are you 12?
@@amberlerae6033 PRO TIP: just throw your panty at him, he’ll stop talking!
The GAP is just outrageous !
Just hold on a minute! Are you telling me men are better at sports!?!? Well who would have thunk it.....
Just compare the records, not other mean.
@@PJPKPENGKALAN yep it's obvious i have no idea why this is even a debate.
@Фернанда Yh your right but not necessarily gymnastics though.
@Фернанда Sry, I didn't realise what you said, I didn't see rythmic, I thought you meant just gymnastics.
Is there a word think?or is it thought?
Isn’t the 5k the same as the 5000m? How did you get different times for these 2?
Metres inside stadium (track), kilometres outside stadium (road run).
okay now how many women records were st by a bio male
??
1.39... 10.000 meters is = 10 km. My question is how you have different records for the same discipline
Metres in stadium (track), kms outside stadium (road run).
And you can imagine the compound effect these differences play in sports that involve multiple of these different skills. For example basketball involves jumping, stamina, explosive speed and accuracy. Let’s say that there is a 20% difference between men and women’s jump, 20% in stamina, 11% in explosive speed and 10% in accuracy, that would compound to a 61% difference in basketball. Most sports would involve hundreds of these different skills that would all compound to create the skill gaps we see in sports.
And in 99% of games, women can't beat men, that's a fact.
That's not how it works. Let's say a sport is made up of 10 different skills that are equally important. Every skill is 10% of your total skill at the game. If you make a 10% difference in a skill like jumping, that's only 10% of the game, so 10% of 10% gain which is 1%.
@@suckieduckie That's not how it works either though, because let's say you're playing basketball or soccer. If you're 10% slower to every ball, then you win 0% of all 50/50 balls, and only get the ball when you start off much closer to it.
@@sebfox2194 Basketball maybe, but in soccer it's just not the case because not every player needs to win aerial duels. Lionel Messi has only ever won a handfull of aerial duels and only scored a few headed goals, but he's easily the best player of all time.
Being 10% slower to every ball is not speed, it's timing. In the Netherlands a player (Daley Blind) just retired and he was known for being very slow which is not good as a defender, but his timing was good enough to compensate.
@suckieduckie I never mentioned aerial duals. I was talking about speed. Of course, timing and positioning matter in soccer, but it's still a fact that if you're 10% slower to every 50/50 ball, then you don't win any 50/50 balls. Slower players compensate not by winning 50/50 balls but with positioning and teamwork to put themselves in an advantageous position to win the ball later. Moreover, it's not just speed. If you're 10% slower, 20% weaker in jumps and acceleration, and 20-50% weaker in strength and power, it makes a massive difference to your game. This is why elite boys aged 15+ generally beat elite women in soccer. And this is also why elite men, who still have elite skills, have to retire once their physical abilities decline to the level where they can no longer compete physically with younger players.
Messi is athletic and has much faster acceleration and change of direction than most players. So, he is physically competitive in the men's game. However, when he is 45, he won't be playing elite men's soccer anymore, despite the fact that he'd still have elite skills, because he won't be physically competitive at that age. He'd likely still be good enough to dominate the women's game at 45, but he will have to retire from the mens game, because your athleticism and physical capabilities are indeed important in soccer.
The trend seem to be that in running events, the most commonly competed events have narrower margins wow the least competitive events have wider margins.
That, plus anything power or strength oriented men dominate more
What’s the difference between 10.000m and 10 km? Duh..
Metres in stadium (track), kms outside stadium (road run).
If it is 10.000m and 10 km then the difference is 10km-0.010km= 9.99 km
Los lanzamientos no existen?
The God of Time is a mysoginist
I think that the difference in 1,500m freestyle swim is the smallest difference between men and women In olympic event: less then 6%
It’s gonna be much bigger difference though if you subtract Katie Ledecky
There are different records for a 5000 meter race and a 5 Kilometer race?
They're the same thing.
Metres in stadium (track), kms outside stadium (road run).
What's the difference between 5000m and 5 kilometres?
Metres in stadium (track), kms outside stadium (road run).
Better at everything xd
Except for giving birth and making ham and cheese sandwiches. And the laundry. And sweeping floors. And folding clothes. And child care.
A strong loving woman at home to take care of the children.... you got to be a strong man away from the home.
@@CelticSpiritsCoven these are rather arbitrary. No one can gauge who’s better at what regarding these things. Some just flat out don’t make sense Like giving birth? Men can’t birth at all so there’s nothing to be “better at” in the scenario.
don't be saying that stuff karma always hits hard- ._.
@@CelticSpiritsCoven I can literally do all of those except from give birth plus this is sports related so all of that stuff is relevant lmfao
@@xxitactical_8723 You don't have the patience to raise children like a woman does. And everyone knows it.
Why does it have the difference between 5000meters and 5kilometers??
5000m indoor and the 5km was outside
Sry Women, hate to break it to u but ur never gonna beat men in sports.
Or in mind games like chess,go and even tge rubik's cube
@@hellosurname4128 a million years later.......lol ........there won't be be any humans left till then
Actually women are better in gymnastics
@@zenalznther4799 only thing
@@zenalznther4799 there actually not
Can someone explain the relatively small difference in 100 kilometers?
it is probably one of two things.
1. The pool is so small, you don't have enough to depth really draw out the potential.
2. It is such an extreme distance that the biological difference fades and it becomes a training difference.
I am leaning more towards option A but you can't really rule out B.
But they want equal pay
What the fuck does that even have to do with the video?
@@lauriegallant8901 hey karen
@@lauriegallant8901 they get paid to entertain and believe it or not higher performance = more viewers = MORE MONEY
@@gohelmehul4329 your logic is pathetic. And so are your arguments
5000 metres and 5 kilometres are the same distances so how do they have different times?
Meters in stadium (track), km's outside stadium (road run).
both are equally gifted. men have a genetic advantage in endurance sports and women in flexibility! this video is ONE SIDED! it only talks about an endurance related sport ie track!
Extreme flexibility is only useful in a couple of sports, like dancing, gymnastics, ice skating and martial arts. And it's not the main attribute required, since a slightly less flexible athlete who is faster and more powerful can beat a slightly more flexible athlete who is slower and less powerful. So men are flexible enough for all of these sports.
In the vast majority of sports, speed, strength, power, and endurance are much more important than extreme flexibility. So the latter attribute is not as important in most sports, as long as you have a decent level of flexibility, which most men can obtain.
Women are better at endurance sports. Men are overall better at sports using strength and speed.
01:23 and following: What's the difference between 5000 metres and 5 kilometres and 10000 metres and 10 kilometres etc.?
one is to designate track the other is for road.
I worked in abatement/demolition for four years. It was hard, dirty work. The whole time I was there we had two women apply for the job. Neither lasted more than a few weeks. Hard labor, lifting heavy things, carrying heavy loads, it isn't for them. It just isn't. They don't have the strength, particularly the upper body strength needed for this kind of work. Men and women are different, have different strengths and weaknesses. Society needs to accept that and stop trying to create this fantasy of absolute equality.
@@matthewkuhl79 union company?
@@matthewkuhl79 consider moving. 😆 Seriously. But don't move to Washington. It's a miniature California now.
@@matthewkuhl79 good plan.
Society.......you mean Democrats
Now do life expectancy.
I think, the following comment I had somewhere else on another video today can add to the discussion.
"I just watched part of a program on Tokyo Olympics & how it is taking big strides in gender quality, by introducing new medal winning options for women.
But I got fed up with this nagging feminist narrative. I 🤔 if men & women are only diff. in physical aspects then why is Chess competitions not held without gender segregations. Do Feminists fear that their oppression Olympics would be proven as sham ??
I would use the ideas detailed by many, but prominently by Jordan Peterson in recent years, to say that Male abilties in general have wider statistical distribution on most parameters, thus men are far worse & far better on most metrics.
What I'm fed up is, feminism's grip on policy matters reducing all matters of diff gender expression to oppression & inequality debate alone, when it comes to goodies, but to toxic masculinity when it comes to rotten 🍎🍎."
To answer your questions.
1. the paris olympics was equal in the amount of mens competitors and women's competitors for the first time.
2. Equestrian does not separate men and women. They compete against each other as there is no physical advantage.
3. Shooting was also combined at one point but when a woman won a shooting event at the 1992 Olympics women were straight up banned from competing for a few olympics. Talk about petty.
@@anubis520 Did you even completely read my comment, let alone understand it??
Calling men petty is easy, when most women indoctrinated with Feminism by woke-feminists will be the ones beating most men on pettiness game by huge margins, if it were to be played in Olympics. 😝😝
I always thought 5 kilometers was 5000 meters. Apparently not , seeing how there is a separate record for each
I am also confused by this...
@@galeontiger road run vs run on track
Nice to be a man😉
Thank you for your commnet.
@@PJPKPENGKALAN plesure
Don't get confused dude, unless you are a high performances athlete, any of those girls would kick you ass
@@yurajovanovic6256 bro, if i was a women i will be decouraged, even if im a profetionnal atlhete, i would keep in my mind that a bunch of 16 years old could beat me, cause that has happend in football, and bro a guy who doesnt play in nba, or europeen basketball, could probebly beat some wwnba players, im not saying ill be better than some wnba players (but could always be possible and mush more if youre a man) but im talking in average
@@lucasaskovic1683 agree
What’s the name of this instrumental
What’s is the difference between 5000m and 5km I need help
M in stadium (track), KM outside stadium (road run).
And these world records are between different men and women in almost every case. That says a lot.
How did you calculate this?
The other way is also possible.
my pr as an eighth grader was 49 sec on the 400 which is pretty close to the females record rn its beginning of ninth grade so i dont have official times but my pr at home was 47 sec
this video needs to change the title to run records and not athletic records* The title is very vague.
Are they not athletic records😊
i wonder what is the difference between 5000m and 5km competitions and there is 18 seconds difference between 2 competitions ???!
what the hell, same 10km and 10000m !
@@Cmustang22 Metres in stadium (track), kms outside stadium (road run).
There is a mistake in this numbers. 20,000m and 20km is the same. Because 1km = 1,000m.
M in stadium (track), KM outside stadium (road run).
These percentages are wrong! It shouldn't be based on the time difference, but the distance covered in that time🤦
I remember in high school, I ran the mile. The time for boys to qualify for sectionals was 4:50. It was 5:50 for girls. Over 20% slower. And totally unfair when you’d see girls having double the field size in mid distance races because of their cake standards
I don't understand the difference between 5,000m & 10,000m VS 5K &10K. WTH?
Metres in stadium (track), kilometres outside stadium (road run).
@@PJPKPENGKALAN Ahhh Thank you. I'm an American struggling with the metric system so that REALLY confused me!!
I think that the more upper body strength that is needed, the bigger difference there is. Seen in pole vault, but moreso in weight lifting. An example, bench press. Men:1400 lbs Women: 700. 100% difference.
Why separate 5000m and 5 km?
indoor vs outdoor
What is the difference between 10,000 meters and 10km or 5000 meters and 5km?
Metres inside stadium (track), kilometres outside stadium (road run).
This clearly shows that, however, competing in sports for men and women does not make sense.
This duel is uneven from the very beginning.
And fights for women and men are pathological.
We are different and we have different abilities, and more and more we are told that we are the same.
My children, when they fall off the fence, run to their mother, and if you have to climb onto him, they run to me.
I wonder why?
Pole vault is now way bigger!
Why is 5K up there twice?
Meters in stadium (track), km's outside stadium (road run).
@@PJPKPENGKALAN aaahhh. thanks
lol, 10000 meters and 10km have different records?
10000 meter is on the track and 10 km is on the road.
In schools our kids are being told there’s no difference between m and w ….
Weird kind of schools then. I guess you found that fact while reaching in your buttocks cavity.
Thank's!
I was expecting it to be much bigger gap
Some events, like those run in the Olympics, are commonly and regularly run all over the world. Some of the events listed here are not competed as often and therefore can produce wildly different results based on one off performances. Secondly, these are comparisons of records rather than just say comparing the performances of a broad swath of elite males and females. If you take Olympic running events only in any Olympics and compare the cumulative times of the 2nd through 6th place finishers you will see a very consistent representation of the differences between men and women. Why 2nd through 6th? Well, obviously they are elite if they are in an Olympic Final. Drop the 1st time to rule out one exceptional performance that skews the results like Florence Griffith-Joyner in 1988 or Usain Bolt. FloJo's 1988 record has stood for 36 years and skewed the comparison between men and women. It is also very suspect for a few reasons. Only recently did Jamaica's Elaine Thompson-Herah come relatively close to Flo-Jo. Drop the 7th and 8th place finishers because someone could pull a hammy and run 20 plus seconds in the 100 thereby skewing the results in an unrealistic fashion. Or some runner could get DQ'd and there would only be seven in the race to begin. And a runner could be well back at the 50 meter mark and just pull up off the gas. As far as that goes if the leader in the race is well ahead at 70 or 80 meters in a 100 meter race they will frequently take their foot off the gas which skews the results. Compare 2nd through 6th at an Olympic Final and you will get a true representation of the difference between men and women at the elite level. Those results tend to show something like an 11% difference at almost any distance.
That women's 100m record is false as it was wind-aided.
And, of course, the pole vault is now up to 6.25 as of the Olympics (from 6.18) because Armando is an animal!
I didnt know 5000m and 5km had different records...
one is for track the other is for road.
Why tf there is 5000m and 5km categories?!?
5000m = 5km
Metres in stadium (track), kms outside stadium (road run).
Now the beer drinking World record