Amtrak & MBTA Commuter Rail Morning Rush Northeast Corridor Action @ Route 128 (3/1/24)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 янв 2025

Комментарии • 30

  • @railfannerjs6308
    @railfannerjs6308 11 месяцев назад +8

    4:25
    Species: Buddus Amfleetus
    5:06
    Species: Acelus Expresus
    16:20
    Species:
    Avelius Acelus Libertus the 2nd
    Don’t feed the wild fleet. It’s against the rules!

  • @NortheastCorridorFilms
    @NortheastCorridorFilms 11 месяцев назад +7

    lets goooo mbta love when u come to mass

  • @allyreneepenny9447
    @allyreneepenny9447 10 месяцев назад +1

    Awesome ❗
    Love the ACELA ❣️

  • @MbtaVideoClips
    @MbtaVideoClips 11 месяцев назад

    Nice! 1855 just entered service, you're prob one of the first railfanners to see it.

    • @DRAILFAN13
      @DRAILFAN13 10 месяцев назад

      Is it the new Acela?

  • @Metratrainguy
    @Metratrainguy 10 месяцев назад +1

    How come the Amtrak Acela liberty expressed through the station was it out of service?

  • @jordanalexander4331
    @jordanalexander4331 4 месяца назад +1

    May I ask why does MARC and MBTA is diesel locomotives if they have electrified lines? SEPTA’s entire network is fully electrified, and are in the woods too electrified former diesel ones that were cut.

    • @pootispiker2866
      @pootispiker2866 4 месяца назад +1

      English, please.
      MBTA is not fully electrified, notably the commuter rail lines servicing the suburbs that see less heavy usage.

    • @erichking9096
      @erichking9096 2 месяца назад

      Aside from the Boston to Providence service which runs along the northeast corridor, the MBTA’s network is unnelectrified and it would thus be unprofitable to have a fleet of electric locomotives that can only be used on one line. Marc does have some electric locomotives for the Penn line which is over the nec, but similarly the rest of their network is diesel only. Septa inherited all of their lines from the reading company which electrified all of their lines

  • @slim.reacts
    @slim.reacts 11 месяцев назад +2

    10:32 why is that train so short I swear I’ve seen that pass by Forest Hills before

  • @AhmearClayIombo-dj6di
    @AhmearClayIombo-dj6di 11 месяцев назад +1

    Awesome Catches Fan Railer

  • @reallifechronicles1707
    @reallifechronicles1707 7 месяцев назад +2

    Is the other guy with you Tyler White?

  • @blakefilippi9612
    @blakefilippi9612 11 месяцев назад

    Nice! Back in Massachusetts

  • @NCRP710
    @NCRP710 11 месяцев назад +1

    Yes

  • @Metratrainguy
    @Metratrainguy 10 месяцев назад +1

    Why is there a 5 cart northeast regional

    • @FanRailer
      @FanRailer  10 месяцев назад +3

      lol, that's 66. 65/66/67 all run relatively short. Ideally, there would be a Viewliner sleeper on the rear of those trains, but logistical difficulties prevent that from happening at this time.

    • @Metratrainguy
      @Metratrainguy 10 месяцев назад

      @@FanRailer ok

  • @petercole8798
    @petercole8798 Месяц назад

    Great vid make new one please.

  • @technogodmedia
    @technogodmedia 11 месяцев назад +1

    Train go brrr

  • @SoCalHighIron
    @SoCalHighIron 10 месяцев назад +1

    I know it's a small thing, but does anyone else feel like it would be so much nicer to have an actual HUMAN voice making the station announcements? I mean, this bot isn't even saying "Amtrak" properly... Amtrak please hire a professional to record these announcements and only use the automated voice when necessary. The details always matter.

    • @FanRailer
      @FanRailer  10 месяцев назад +1

      You hit the crux of the matter with your comment, ie, “hire”. I’d rather hear an automated voice and see Amtrak put that money towards more tangible improvements in service.

    • @SoCalHighIron
      @SoCalHighIron 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@FanRailer I think a non-recurring expense to un-automate announcements which every single traveler using the station experiences is a pretty reasonable ask. What tangible service improvements would you suggest for a similar budget?

    • @FanRailer
      @FanRailer  10 месяцев назад +1

      For this single expense, probably nothing terribly noticeable. It's more about the principle behind the expenditure. They're trying to run a business. Why waste money on something only a fraction of the patronage would truly appreciate when there's a free alternative that gets the job done? If transportation companies pandered to every single piece of minutiae like this to satisfy everyone's personal opinion on something, they'd be even more in the red than they already are. Amtrak and other commuter railroads already have to fight for every dollar of funding they can get from the government, so anything deemed non-essential really isn't on the table for discussion. Just look at LIRR and their new M9 railcars; the pre-recorded announcements on those cars are now synthesized as opposed to sound recorded like they were for the M7s.

    • @SoCalHighIron
      @SoCalHighIron 10 месяцев назад +2

      @@FanRailer Like I said in my original comment, I know it's a small thing. But I feel like it's a small expense that could inject a welcome element of humanity and hospitality that passengers in the station would appreciate, even if they don't specifically notice. It's a shame that Amtrak and other passenger railroads have to fight so bitterly to get funding which is still liberally dolled out for road infrastructure. I agree that they need to prioritize allocation of spending for things that can increase ridership and hopefully provide material return on investment. Hopefully someday the little things can be better, too.

    • @pootispiker2866
      @pootispiker2866 4 месяца назад

      Nice to haves come after getting amtrak to the top. Next suggestion.

  • @Waltaere
    @Waltaere 11 месяцев назад

    Faaan 😃