Honestly him copying her was not an act of inappropriateness. He saw that the rule 'you can sit like this and put your shoes on the couch' was already established and he wanted to adjust to it in order to feel more comfortable. Yes, he did not ask for permission but thats how introspective behaviour works. Why should he be excluded from this sitting position if she can? There is no reason, so there was no reason to ask. Believe me, he definitely thought about it beforehand and probably wouldn't have done it, if he felt it was inappropriate. Give INFPs minds some credit. There is a lot going on without having to express it all the time. Vocal communication isn't the only form of communication. Also what about his speech was awkward?? He is passionate and friendly at the same time. Thats amazing and wish more people were like that.
As INFPs, we take things more personally than others (we might consider what was said as criticism) so I can see how fellow INFPs could be overreacting
On the contrary for us, INFJs, we tand to take things impersonally as a criticism that everyone is succeptible to receive, thus we generally have measured reactions.
My crush is an INFP and i realized they dont really take criticism really well and usually lead to outburst of emotional conviction. Me an INFJ didnt even see it initially as bad but admired the pure passionate expression that is true to her self identity. This happened when i told her after getting comfortable conversing with her what i observed about her in the past which i said was a misjudgement since i have heard more from her perspective. No matter how many times i told her that i was wrong in that, that was before i have come to know her now, somehow she was stuck on her emotional conviction and was unyielding until she was satisfied. I just smiled and kept silent not because i made her angry but because i was happy i saw a raw honesty of emotion that cannot be faked. I know it is weird but INFJ enjoys witnessing truth in whatever form it may take, kinda weird tho but i know i responded appopriately because after she noticed my silence she really wanted to see a reaction out of me but i couldnt tell her what was on my mind she probably thought i was judging her negatively, lol.
That was really interesting. I have taken the 16 personalities test a few times and fluctuated between INFJ and INFP. I always wondered what that meant.
Perhaps find another person that knows you very well to help you take the test? I thought I was an INFP for the longest time until I took into account how I act at work and around my friends. Thats how I became solid in INFJ
Omg, I'm an INFP and I'm annoyed seeing all these INFPs oversensitive comments. We need to learn to take critism. Please. Or else we won't really learn much. This video really showcase Fi and Fe well. And if you studied what Fi and Fe is, you would know that this is in fact correct representation of it.
As an INFP, I can't help but feel frustration towards Mulligan due to the possibility that she wasn't sincere with her reassurance. 1) I'm not implying that she was trying to take advantage of Garfield, but this shows how those who are able to be fake can take advantage of others can get more ahead in the world by doing so. 2) It makes us INFPs feel inferior since we can be naive. What we say is usually honest and considered 'real'. We want to feel that others have that same sincerity but it's simply not true. I believe she was being sincere, but Mulligan could have told Garfield that she didn't think he talked for too long because she is on camera and wants to improve or maintain her reputation. We don't play the game that these people play for the sake of our self-interest. Unfortunately, that isn't always a good thing.
You're partially right but it's way less perverse than how much you think it is, so as a INFJ, I'm going to explain her intentions in this video. 1) She didn't seem to have reasons to take advantage of Garfield. It's totally true that we can fake and that we could take advantage of others by doing so. However, the way INFJ uses this ability is always centered around the objective of helping people before himself, because we think globaly first and foremost. One major problem we usually have is being too kind and forgetting ourselves. What you describe fits more the INTJ personality. So please don't fear us. 2) I personally don't think being naive is always a weakness because on the contrary, we are unable to be naive. We're always aware of everything that could happen and it tends to make us suspicious all the time and even lonelier sometimes. We can't trust easily. This is a value we appreciate. We have the philosophy that happiness is more important than sincerity. Here is why sometimes we use white lies because we love people and want them to progress, rather than lying for our sake. 3) Maybe she wasn't sincere but you have to ask yourself, is it really important at the end of the day? You're right, she could have said that by self-interest but as I said, knowing that the person is ok is her priority before her career. However, if he had asked to her to be honest with him about if she thinks he talked for too long, she would have told him sincerely because she would have understood that this was what he really wanted from her. There is almost never bad intentions involved behind that. So I wanted to clarify the fact that we don't play this game for the sake of our self-interest either, but for your interest. And I'm also agree that this isn't always a good thing to do so, because we should do it for us more often actually.
As an INFP with an Infj (possibly Enfj) mother and another Infj close friend I’ve realized that even if they aren’t always 100 % honest they are usually well meaning. It’s possible that she didn’t want to look bad on camera by saying that she thought he talked too long, but it’s just as likely that she didn’t want HIM to look bad or be embarrassed if she agreed with him. So it’s possible she wasn’t being sincere when she said he didn’t talk too long, but the desire to not hurt someone’s feelings and save them embarrassment was sincere. Or maybe she really meant it. Who knows.
I’m an INFP too, and I agree, I also feel like she missed the point when she reassured him by rephrasing what he said. I don’t like it when I explain things and people act like they get it, but they clearly don’t
If you don't mind some constructive feedback... I think the biggest problem with this video is that it has a lot of meaningful voice-over, but the visuals only rarely compliment it. Perhaps if it were condensed and more time was spent making connections between specific moments in the interviews, it might be more helpful to people? Very useful content though, and nice vocals. Most videos just talk about theory and never point to it in real life, which I believe is a key source of the misinformation and confusion out there; something I am trying to fight as well on my channel. Good work!
This video has an Fe bias: I disagree with Fe being universal and 'caring more for the feelings around them'. and Fi being only personal and 'only about their own feelings'. Fi is essentially more universal, as it doesnt change for situational circumstances. For example, Fi sees the equal worth of all human beings alike, and thus will treat a homeless person with the same level of respect as the Queen. All Fi types are bound by these base principles. Fi defines people not by their external persona or objective social status or group membership.. but by their common humanity underneath. Thus when they speak they are appealing to this common humanity in the people around them also. This is proven by correlating Fe and Fi with Te and Ti.. Ti is like mathematics. Its universal in everything that exists in the world. Mathematics explains most of the phenomenology that happens in the world from base principles and formulas. For example, Ti will study the structure of an engine and then apply all the principles of how that engine is constructed to every other kind of engine, big or small. In a toy car or a truck. Its a universal system of logic that is referenced across the board. Theres a formula there. This is the same as Fi. Fi doesnt keep a track of situational differences of appropriate behaviour, but references the human emotional experience as a whole... as if it were a universal story we all experience. Thus Garfields story is speaking to the part of every human being listening to him that feels the pain of being treated unjustly and being treated with less importance than someone else. He needs to express deeply in order to reach deeply into those listening to him in those same emotions.
Fe is social appropriateness, meaning if the social value is killing people, it is socially appropriate to also kill. Fi is internal authenticity and personal values, meaning if it is socially appropriate to kill but personally wrong, Fi will not kill.
@@SJ-ej3vj I guess that example is a little more on the extreme side. I'm not sure Fe goes THAT far in making others feel better, when it results in others being no longer around, but this example helped me understand Fe Fi differences though :) thanks
S J that’s a real weak analogy. You’re obviously implying that fi is better because of superior morals coming from one’s self, when the disconnect from social expectations gets to strong, fi can go of the rails pretty quickly.
@@molinj.710 You're right, though since the video had an Fe bias it's nice to see that there are people standing up for each side ^^ though I wish this wouldn't feel like a "which is better" debate and more like a "both are pretty cool" discussion... this out of the way I need to sing now (grabs mic Shrek 2 music starts playing) "Where have all good comments gone and where are all the gods? Where's the unbiased hercules to write against the odds?..."
"Are Mary Sue videos Mary-Sue Themselves?.." "Is Mary Sueing Mary Sues Mary Sue-ish?" "Mary Sue; Mary Sue. (by Mary Sue)" "Breaking: Mary A. Sue Sues Mary Sue Whistleblowers at IDRlabs" "What if Deep Down, We're All Mary Sues?" "Top 10 Reasons Mary Sues Aren't All Bad." Finally: "Mary Sues, the Characters We Need in the Face of Too Much Depth."
You could also say she is people pleasing and potential codependent and even could be narcissist if she wants people to see her in a great way.... and he is his own Man, has healthy Boundaries, knows what is good for himself, he is in tune with himself in a healthy way. Even though he is introverted he helps others simply by his Insights and Authenticity.
Me as an male INFP coming from the original video older. Noting that you actually changed the whole video. Which makes me think this works better as a narrated version. And i feel like an important part of the previous video got dumped. I do like this one. But feels rather a Narrated not remastered. Just my honest and maybe peculiar approach.
I feel like this video (and the one before it) paints INFPs/Garfield in a negative light l, while INFJs/Mulligan are being made to seem somewhat saintly. It just didn't feel as objective as I would expect from something like this.
Well I think Fi makes for the better ideas and inspiration/feelings whilest Fe mostly aims to comfort their surroundings. Both are equally good and needed.
I disagree that this video portrays INFPs badly and INFJs positively. I think that is in perception, not intention. I think society sees INFJs as saintly, but INFJs themselves know they struggle and have negative qualities. But we want to get along so they don't show. That's not always good.
ikr? like i feel like if andrew was the first one to put his feet up on the couch they would've changed the narration and said that if carey put her feet up that she was being insensitive. idk it just feels very skewed
This is ironic, considering that I once spoke of strengthening both the artistic and scientific departments at my school - stating that can work together and be harnessed for the future.
In general, Internal feeling doesn’t mean to ignore external aspects. Infp wants to live in their own Idea world they fit to their own value and idea but infp is very responsible of in the realistic aspects to make things better unless conflicting with their own value. Infp is very empathetic ,which mean they consider other people feelings and understand what it is. I want to say “ escape the harsh reality time to time for recharge! Infp is not naive in the reality but want to live on their own value and stick to it without hurting anyone but even at own sacrifice. Integrity and Dignity is the priority. I don’t agree into this video! Also, we can not overlook astrologic sides at the same time. I feel most people think on one dimension based on what is seen or heard. Evidence or proof whatever but sometimes we can not clearly explain but our intuition tells more than in words. That’s why Our whole system easily brainwash people. Scanning things as whole and integrating all pieces info to think in multi dynamic and complex dimension. Only I can tell is human being is a continuum of the body, mind and soul as an unique being. Always take care of inner world as much as outside of look. In other word, taking care of own self physically emotionally spiritually and mentally! I just wanted to express myself on this video! Being so good at chopping off to each piece in detail b/c it’s easy to prove but everything interacts while forming complex and dynamic. We can consider this MITB as psychologic metrics but it’s a small portion of as whole of our own self exploration. How to think vs what to think This is a big question on everything taught or known of!!!! Another question is “humans are “being” OR “become” this kind of stuff can be reference not representation of one subject for self exploration.
lol it was the moment he realized the rant he went on possibly was a bad idea and his panic to find validation for his ideas caused him to quickly turn to the most likely person in the room to validate him and least likely to criticize him. he was probably having a small panic attack, poor thing.
Im not a Party favor. Party's are overwhelming unless ive had a lot of practice with the people around me. Family members, friends etc. Meeting new people at a party is a nightmare. Self consciousness overload. Meeting new people ordinarily is ok not if im under pressure to be comfortable makes me uncomfortable, and self conscious.
You should learn cognitive functions, because INFP and INFJ are really different; they have no common functions at all. These type may look same (with only one letter difference) , but they aren't.
@Tryfon Sot. You cannot be two personality types. It might be hard to differentiate since I relate to Andrew as well (although I’m an INFJ) so I understand where you’re coming from. You should look into it more if you’re still confused.
yeah man every time I take the test, I get either INFP or INFJ, usually INFP, but the test tells me that I'm like 55/45 (or something like that) between Judging and Prospecting while every other part is pretty much set in stone at 70% or more.
I think he sat like that because her sitting like that after getting permission was pretty much the ok for everyone to sit like that. On another note, as an Fi, it really rubs me the wrong way that she "soothed" Andrew by supposedly lying about her own feelings lol That feels so much worse that someone just saying "haha, that was a little long-winded"
Hey, look he updated and it is still the same horse shit it as though he has been hurt deeply by an INFP and resents us. I get the feeling some person this guy crushed on chose an INFP over him.
Andrew Garfield is not an introvert and he doesn't even use fi. He's an fe dom. Infps are one of the most reserved types and one of the hardest to actually find in the celebrity sphere, especially male infps.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Honestly him copying her was not an act of inappropriateness.
He saw that the rule 'you can sit like this and put your shoes on the couch' was already established and he wanted to adjust to it in order to feel more comfortable. Yes, he did not ask for permission but thats how introspective behaviour works. Why should he be excluded from this sitting position if she can? There is no reason, so there was no reason to ask. Believe me, he definitely thought about it beforehand and probably wouldn't have done it, if he felt it was inappropriate. Give INFPs minds some credit. There is a lot going on without having to express it all the time.
Vocal communication isn't the only form of communication.
Also what about his speech was awkward?? He is passionate and friendly at the same time. Thats amazing and wish more people were like that.
@theinquirer13 They can't help it, or probably even understand what you're saying. ”Fi sees judgment as oppositional."
@@amarti53 INFP and i agree we do see it as oppositional unfortunately
@@xXDopamineInbalanceXx Love you for your honesty
@@xXDopamineInbalanceXx INFP and sometimes we even take it too far
If we see that she is given the right to sit like than then there is no Te rules that he can't. Because Mulligan already is permitted to do so.
As INFPs, we take things more personally than others (we might consider what was said as criticism) so I can see how fellow INFPs could be overreacting
I'm a bit mad tho, a bit overreacting probably.
On the contrary for us, INFJs, we tand to take things impersonally as a criticism that everyone is succeptible to receive, thus we generally have measured reactions.
My crush is an INFP and i realized they dont really take criticism really well and usually lead to outburst of emotional conviction. Me an INFJ didnt even see it initially as bad but admired the pure passionate expression that is true to her self identity. This happened when i told her after getting comfortable conversing with her what i observed about her in the past which i said was a misjudgement since i have heard more from her perspective. No matter how many times i told her that i was wrong in that, that was before i have come to know her now, somehow she was stuck on her emotional conviction and was unyielding until she was satisfied. I just smiled and kept silent not because i made her angry but because i was happy i saw a raw honesty of emotion that cannot be faked. I know it is weird but INFJ enjoys witnessing truth in whatever form it may take, kinda weird tho but i know i responded appopriately because after she noticed my silence she really wanted to see a reaction out of me but i couldnt tell her what was on my mind she probably thought i was judging her negatively, lol.
@@marcjanverdelantar9605 as you said, "infj enjoys witnessing truth" and infp's really want to know what the truth is
@@marcjanverdelantar9605 and if you can make an infp say something you know that's he's deep feeling about that subject
I don’t think he’s being rude about INFPs. As an INFP myself I agree with most of what he’s saying and I can relate to Garfield in this sense
That was really interesting. I have taken the 16 personalities test a few times and fluctuated between INFJ and INFP. I always wondered what that meant.
BrownStainz same, its honestly really frustrating...
Me too, I just cant tell which one I am because I recognise myself in both types.
Perhaps find another person that knows you very well to help you take the test? I thought I was an INFP for the longest time until I took into account how I act at work and around my friends. Thats how I became solid in INFJ
Look up the cognitive functions :)
@@bunknee1220 i second this
Omg, I'm an INFP and I'm annoyed seeing all these INFPs oversensitive comments. We need to learn to take critism. Please. Or else we won't really learn much. This video really showcase Fi and Fe well. And if you studied what Fi and Fe is, you would know that this is in fact correct representation of it.
i agreee these comments show how sensitive infps can be
I’m an INFP and I’m just glad to be in this comment section full of INFPs
As an INFP, I can't help but feel frustration towards Mulligan due to the possibility that she wasn't sincere with her reassurance.
1) I'm not implying that she was trying to take advantage of Garfield, but this shows how those who are able to be fake can take advantage of others can get more ahead in the world by doing so.
2) It makes us INFPs feel inferior since we can be naive. What we say is usually honest and considered 'real'. We want to feel that others have that same sincerity but it's simply not true.
I believe she was being sincere, but Mulligan could have told Garfield that she didn't think he talked for too long because she is on camera and wants to improve or maintain her reputation. We don't play the game that these people play for the sake of our self-interest. Unfortunately, that isn't always a good thing.
You're partially right but it's way less perverse than how much you think it is, so as a INFJ, I'm going to explain her intentions in this video.
1) She didn't seem to have reasons to take advantage of Garfield. It's totally true that we can fake and that we could take advantage of others by doing so. However, the way INFJ uses this ability is always centered around the objective of helping people before himself, because we think globaly first and foremost. One major problem we usually have is being too kind and forgetting ourselves. What you describe fits more the INTJ personality.
So please don't fear us.
2) I personally don't think being naive is always a weakness because on the contrary, we are unable to be naive. We're always aware of everything that could happen and it tends to make us suspicious all the time and even lonelier sometimes. We can't trust easily. This is a value we appreciate. We have the philosophy that happiness is more important than sincerity. Here is why sometimes we use white lies because we love people and want them to progress, rather than lying for our sake.
3) Maybe she wasn't sincere but you have to ask yourself, is it really important at the end of the day? You're right, she could have said that by self-interest but as I said, knowing that the person is ok is her priority before her career. However, if he had asked to her to be honest with him about if she thinks he talked for too long, she would have told him sincerely because she would have understood that this was what he really wanted from her. There is almost never bad intentions involved behind that. So I wanted to clarify the fact that we don't play this game for the sake of our self-interest either, but for your interest. And I'm also agree that this isn't always a good thing to do so, because we should do it for us more often actually.
Absolutely agreed. It's frustrating on a certain level. INFP here.
As an INFP with an Infj (possibly Enfj) mother and another Infj close friend I’ve realized that even if they aren’t always 100 % honest they are usually well meaning. It’s possible that she didn’t want to look bad on camera by saying that she thought he talked too long, but it’s just as likely that she didn’t want HIM to look bad or be embarrassed if she agreed with him. So it’s possible she wasn’t being sincere when she said he didn’t talk too long, but the desire to not hurt someone’s feelings and save them embarrassment was sincere. Or maybe she really meant it. Who knows.
I’m an INFP too, and I agree, I also feel like she missed the point when she reassured him by rephrasing what he said. I don’t like it when I explain things and people act like they get it, but they clearly don’t
@@EmanuelGene INJS get it, it's just that sometimes we think that the best for that situation is not saying everything
I would love to see more of this content! Give us more!
If you don't mind some constructive feedback...
I think the biggest problem with this video is that it has a lot of meaningful voice-over, but the visuals only rarely compliment it. Perhaps if it were condensed and more time was spent making connections between specific moments in the interviews, it might be more helpful to people?
Very useful content though, and nice vocals. Most videos just talk about theory and never point to it in real life, which I believe is a key source of the misinformation and confusion out there; something I am trying to fight as well on my channel.
Good work!
This video has an Fe bias:
I disagree with Fe being universal and 'caring more for the feelings around them'. and Fi being only personal and 'only about their own feelings'. Fi is essentially more universal, as it doesnt change for situational circumstances. For example, Fi sees the equal worth of all human beings alike, and thus will treat a homeless person with the same level of respect as the Queen. All Fi types are bound by these base principles. Fi defines people not by their external persona or objective social status or group membership.. but by their common humanity underneath. Thus when they speak they are appealing to this common humanity in the people around them also. This is proven by correlating Fe and Fi with Te and Ti.. Ti is like mathematics. Its universal in everything that exists in the world. Mathematics explains most of the phenomenology that happens in the world from base principles and formulas. For example, Ti will study the structure of an engine and then apply all the principles of how that engine is constructed to every other kind of engine, big or small. In a toy car or a truck. Its a universal system of logic that is referenced across the board. Theres a formula there. This is the same as Fi.
Fi doesnt keep a track of situational differences of appropriate behaviour, but references the human emotional experience as a whole... as if it were a universal story we all experience. Thus Garfields story is speaking to the part of every human being listening to him that feels the pain of being treated unjustly and being treated with less importance than someone else. He needs to express deeply in order to reach deeply into those listening to him in those same emotions.
Fe is social appropriateness, meaning if the social value is killing people, it is socially appropriate to also kill. Fi is internal authenticity and personal values, meaning if it is socially appropriate to kill but personally wrong, Fi will not kill.
@@SJ-ej3vj I guess that example is a little more on the extreme side. I'm not sure Fe goes THAT far in making others feel better, when it results in others being no longer around, but this example helped me understand Fe Fi differences though :) thanks
S J that’s a real weak analogy. You’re obviously implying that fi is better because of superior morals coming from one’s self, when the disconnect from social expectations gets to strong, fi can go of the rails pretty quickly.
C This comment has an fi bias
@@molinj.710 You're right, though since the video had an Fe bias it's nice to see that there are people standing up for each side ^^ though I wish this wouldn't feel like a "which is better" debate and more like a "both are pretty cool" discussion... this out of the way I need to sing now (grabs mic Shrek 2 music starts playing) "Where have all good comments gone and where are all the gods? Where's the unbiased hercules to write against the odds?..."
I'm an infp and I relate so fucking much with what he said
Took your quiz, answered honestly and got INFJ.
The video points out in a clear elegant way the differences between the two types, i see no criticism involved as some comments claim
What? No "Is Andrew Garfield a Mary Sue?"
"Are Mary Sue videos Mary-Sue Themselves?.."
"Is Mary Sueing Mary Sues Mary Sue-ish?"
"Mary Sue; Mary Sue. (by Mary Sue)"
"Breaking: Mary A. Sue Sues Mary Sue Whistleblowers at IDRlabs"
"What if Deep Down, We're All Mary Sues?"
"Top 10 Reasons Mary Sues Aren't All Bad."
Finally: "Mary Sues, the Characters We Need in the Face of Too Much Depth."
You could also say she is people pleasing and potential codependent and even could be narcissist if she wants people to see her in a great way.... and he is his own Man, has healthy Boundaries, knows what is good for himself, he is in tune with himself in a healthy way. Even though he is introverted he helps others simply by his Insights and Authenticity.
Me as an male INFP coming from the original video older. Noting that you actually changed the whole video. Which makes me think this works better as a narrated version. And i feel like an important part of the previous video got dumped. I do like this one. But feels rather a Narrated not remastered. Just my honest and maybe peculiar approach.
I feel like INFJ is just INFP who got a bit more jaded and cynical due to bad break up LOL
I feel like this video (and the one before it) paints INFPs/Garfield in a negative light l, while INFJs/Mulligan are being made to seem somewhat saintly. It just didn't feel as objective as I would expect from something like this.
Well I think Fi makes for the better ideas and inspiration/feelings whilest Fe mostly aims to comfort their surroundings. Both are equally good and needed.
I disagree that this video portrays INFPs badly and INFJs positively. I think that is in perception, not intention. I think society sees INFJs as saintly, but INFJs themselves know they struggle and have negative qualities. But we want to get along so they don't show. That's not always good.
ikr? like i feel like if andrew was the first one to put his feet up on the couch they would've changed the narration and said that if carey put her feet up that she was being insensitive. idk it just feels very skewed
So he got dinged for wearing shoes on the couch lol.😂 They're both wearing shoes. So INFP and INFJ both don't give a damn about feet on couches 😂
This is ironic, considering that I once spoke of strengthening both the artistic and scientific departments at my school - stating that can work together and be harnessed for the future.
This is awesome, would love to see more of these
Carrey sit informally at first sight, me as infj
: YOU ARE PASSSSSSS!
In general, Internal feeling doesn’t mean to ignore external aspects. Infp wants to live in their own Idea world they fit to their own value and idea but infp is very responsible of in the realistic aspects to make things better unless conflicting with their own value. Infp is very empathetic ,which mean they consider other people feelings and understand what it is. I want to say “ escape the harsh reality time to time for recharge! Infp is not naive in the reality but want to live on their own value and stick to it without hurting anyone but even at own sacrifice. Integrity and Dignity is the priority. I don’t agree into this video! Also, we can not overlook astrologic sides at the same time. I feel most people think on one dimension based on what is seen or heard. Evidence or proof whatever but sometimes we can not clearly explain but our intuition tells more than in words. That’s why Our whole system easily brainwash people. Scanning things as whole and integrating all pieces info to think in multi dynamic and complex dimension. Only I can tell is human being is a continuum of the body, mind and soul as an unique being. Always take care of inner world as much as outside of look. In other word, taking care of own self physically emotionally spiritually and mentally! I just wanted to express myself on this video!
Being so good at chopping off to each piece in detail b/c it’s easy to prove but everything interacts while forming complex and dynamic. We can consider this MITB as psychologic metrics but it’s a small portion of as whole of our own self exploration.
How to think vs what to think
This is a big question on everything taught or known of!!!!
Another question is “humans are “being” OR “become” this kind of stuff can be reference not representation of one subject for self exploration.
John Lennon’s ‘bed in’ was a classic example of INFP not following social norms via Fe. It was about what he wanted to do, Fi.
The way he turned his head in 6:30 creeps me out
6:28
lol it was the moment he realized the rant he went on possibly was a bad idea and his panic to find validation for his ideas caused him to quickly turn to the most likely person in the room to validate him and least likely to criticize him. he was probably having a small panic attack, poor thing.
Dont worry it’s just his spider sense 6:28
Im not a Party favor. Party's are overwhelming unless ive had a lot of practice with the people around me. Family members, friends etc. Meeting new people at a party is a nightmare. Self consciousness overload. Meeting new people ordinarily is ok not if im under pressure to be comfortable makes me uncomfortable, and self conscious.
I think there are more things added than the previous video. turns out to be another form of the previous video
Remaster (also remastering) refers to enhancing the quality of previously created recordings. =)
IDRlabs thanks for the explanation! however I want more videos on the mbti observation like this
SHOUT OUT TO THAT KOTOR THEME MUSIC
I think I'm INFP and INFJ at the same time. Can this be possible?
same
You should learn cognitive functions, because INFP and INFJ are really different; they have no common functions at all. These type may look same (with only one letter difference) , but they aren't.
@Tryfon Sot.
You cannot be two personality types. It might be hard to differentiate since I relate to Andrew as well (although I’m an INFJ) so I understand where you’re coming from. You should look into it more if you’re still confused.
yeah man every time I take the test, I get either INFP or INFJ, usually INFP, but the test tells me that I'm like 55/45 (or something like that) between Judging and Prospecting while every other part is pretty much set in stone at 70% or more.
Look at CS Joseph's channel, his way is way more accurate (not 100% true just more accurate like 90% more accurate than any mbti test or strategy)
I think he sat like that because her sitting like that after getting permission was pretty much the ok for everyone to sit like that. On another note, as an Fi, it really rubs me the wrong way that she "soothed" Andrew by supposedly lying about her own feelings lol That feels so much worse that someone just saying "haha, that was a little long-winded"
Thanks
This is very interesting
What is this? We want more Mary Sue videos.
But are INTPs mary sue ?
Hmm, I wonder how their types were determined. I do not see an INFP and an INFJ. I see an ENFP (him) and an INFP (her).
Nice!
Now, may you please discuss the rest of their functional stacks?
Thanks 😀
Hey, look he updated and it is still the same horse shit it as though he has been hurt deeply by an INFP and resents us. I get the feeling some person this guy crushed on chose an INFP over him.
Why did this pop up as a RUclips notification? I'm not even subscribed.
More MBTI, less Mary Sue/Star Wars bullshit
What do you want to see concerning typology?
Andrew Garfield is not an introvert and he doesn't even use fi. He's an fe dom. Infps are one of the most reserved types and one of the hardest to actually find in the celebrity sphere, especially male infps.
Let's all pray for the intolerable suffering of all the suppressed Ballerinas in the world.
U think u being funny? U got no clue of their harsh Reality.
Is Poggle the Lesser a Mary Sue?
WAT?
so ince