The buzzing is caused by the ship's radar as it sweeps past the camcorder's location. The lower pitched buzz is from Fletcher and the higher pitched are from the Japanese ships.
japanese navy ship good one torpedo to sunk. japan new ship operation dangerouse act again their imortal enemy now.japan now creat more idial like support ally sqad.
@KentuckyGiant That's the surface search radar you hear hitting the camera. Watch it rotate and when it swings around and is pointing at the the camera, the buzz appears. If you're standing on an upper deck and against a bulkhead, you can actually feel the energy each time one of those swings around, that is, as long as the ship is in close proximity. And, for those who don't know, each of those weapons systems aboard the Japanese destroyers are made in the good old USA.
Those noises are caused by the various radar systems on the ships interfering with the camcorder as the beam sweeps past. The higher pitched noises come from the Japanese destroyers and the lower pitched noises from the American destroyer.
@CharlieDoan That's because most modern warships use much longer-range sophisticated weapons to engage targets. For example, cruise missiles, anti-ship missiles, sea to air missiles, etc. Also, it might be just one gun, but it is extremely accurate and lethal. A modern ship with one of these guns would probably win a battle against a WW2 battleship with enough range. That being said, you're right, battleships and other ships with lots of guns do provoke much awe and a sense of power. ;)
Am I the only one who thinks is absolutely amazaing that 4 japanese destroyers were in Hawaii ca 60 years after their initial attack on the island... And now its like the US and Japanare best friends... I think its very very nice how mankind develops sometimes...
@OnlyLifeMatters Also, Helicopter Destroyers are not "Carriers". The latest Hyuga Class i will in fact admit is a "Light Carrier" (In much the same way as the Brit Invincible class is), none of their other ships, such as the Haruna, shown in this video, is a Carrier. they are just destroyers with a higher than normal Helicopter Compliment (Haruna carries 3 SH-60s, as does Shirane, Arleigh Burke Flight II has full accommodations for 2). Hyuga Carries up to 11 (Standard is 4).
anyone know what this tight formation help in combat ? is it a way to trick enemy radar thinking it one big ship and maybe too big for a destroyer and they may think it a huge cargo boat or huge car carrier ?
Your missing the point, different ships for different roles. The Japanese Navy isn't geared up to fight a Submarine blockade or to clear mines. It's designed to support US Carrier Battle Groups and provide air defence of the Japanese mainland. If it came down to it the RNs Subs would rape the arse off the Japanese fleet, surface and subsurface.
Yes, they're destroyers. Fletcher herself had two helicopters on board. Today's more modern Arleigh Burke class destroyers don't have them, maybe that is what you're thinking of.
@yoleez8 China's Surface Fleet (Well, 57 of the 80 Major Combatants they have) are vintage 1950s designs for the most part. Russia's Pacific Fleet numbers just 5 Surface Ships (Which are for the most part probably not upkept the best or out of date) and just 3 Nuclear Attack Submarines. The Korean Navy, the Japanese Navy, the American Pacific Fleet have them all soundly beaten.
Continue However, the rule about the name of vessel(Ex. Asakaze) is adopted the rule used by the Imperial Japanese NAVY. For instance: The name of DDH uses as the old name of Japanese regions(Ex. "Hyuga" is the name of Miyazaki Pref. - located at the southern Kyushu. There is the birthplace of Japanese Naval Force in ancient time) The name of DD is uses as the name of meteorological phenomina such as "Inazuma(the lightning)".
@OnlyLifeMatters We can only speculate what kind of role the Hyuga would have, but I am leaning towards to a sea-control/ASW for her for now. I can see her having a major refit with a heat-resistant deck and a ski jump if the China-Japan tension escalates. As for the 22DDH, that is definitely a light aircraft carrier.
@OnlyLifeMatters Since when had Amphibious Assault Transports and Helicopter Destroyers (What the Hyuga and 19000t class are, not aircraft carriers, though they can easily been called such) Furthermore, Invincible (22,000 tonnes) is a light carrier, while vessels such as Charles de Gaulle (37,000-42,000) and Giuseppe Garibaldi (27,000-30,000) are medium carriers. 19,000 tonnes is even smaller than a Invincible, and furthermore, the Japanese Ships are completely prevented from carrying fixed
@nitestryker7 yup!but that doesnt mean that they cant raise a powerful navy agian... they actually have the kongo class DDG`s which is a copy of the u.s. navy`s arleigh burke class of destroyers. i also heard that they are building an aircraft carrier again. which is right there to the right>>>its called 16ddh hyuga
You may ask why JMSDF ship uses number? The rule of classification about the JMSDF vessel uses as the same one using in U.S.N.. Because the JMSDF has historically re-built up by giving the reminder PFs & LSSLs from U.S.N. after the re-independence from Allied Nations in the mid of 1950s. Then, the rule of vessel's classifications has been "transplanted" from U.S.N..
Cont (Again) The ROCN by itself can probably take half the PLAN Surface fleet with it, considering the massive technological difference between the Two (Over half of the PLANs surface ships are 1950s vintage, or 60s-70s. The oldest ROCN ships are Upgraded Knox Class ships from the late 60s-Early 70s, and their most powerful are their La Fayette mods and the Kidds, which are much more recent and much more powerful/advanced). Also, the ROKN is much larger than the JMSDF on a ship basis (170-110)
Pretty much. China knows this isn't Hideki Tojo's Japan they are dealing with. If you recall that fishing boat incident last year, even though the Chinese vessel was clearly at fault by entering Japan's EEZ and tried to escape by ramming a JCG patrol craft. Government prosecutors bowed to China's constant demand to release the chinese boat captain.
The buzz was not audible while shooting the footage but it embedded itself on the audio track so it was audible later. Sometimes an AM radio will pick this up too and you can hear it live. In this video, watch the Japanese radars and you'll notice as they are facing me, the higher pitched buzz is audible.
Cont (Again again) but has ~3x less displacement, because of a greater focus for Littoral Ships like Missile Boats and Offshore Patrol Ships given their coastal borders with the DPRK. Their major combat vessels are every bit as capable as any of the JMSDF (Mainly because they both work off of the same systems as USN Burke Class and Ticonderoga class ships) and in one case, more powerful (King Sejong The Great Class / KDX-III, more armament than a Ticonderoga Class Cruiser)
japans navy may be small but is every bit as good as the american navy, their Kongos and Atagos are every bit as good as the american Arleigh Burkes, they may not have carriers, but their frigate navy is very good, America, Japan, and Australia, the 3 most powerful Pacific navies
Why does the big ship and only 1 or 2 Big guns. Instead shoot back to enemies when 2 ships shoot each others. Do they got any personal fire arms so the solders can shoot. I can't stand when I saw only 1 big gun in a big ship????
I'm sure we would have a similar type of surface fleet if we lived next door to China. All through the Cold War the Royal Navy was designed primarily for one of Anti Soviet Submarine operations and mine clearance. Different situations dictate the type of fleet you build. So its not really fair to say Japan has a better surface fleet.
Tiger Cruises were pretty common starting in the 1990s. I served in the late 60s on destroyers and in 1967 we once took a handful of dependents on a short cruise out of Pearl Harbor; that's the only time it happened although we did allow visitors on board for a handful of special events while in port.
I was in the Marines and spent a lot of time with the U S Navy being transported on APA's; AKA's; LST's; LSD's; LPH's; in the Atlantic and the Pacific. Also spent some time at Gitmo Bay and Subic Bay. The good old days.
@OnlyLifeMatters Hardly big compared to the USN, and PLAN. I will admit however, that when i made that comment, i was rather ignorant, it being 2 years ago. As evidenced a lot by the fact i completely forgot about the ROKN and the ROCN. I would myself lable the JMSDF as a "Medium Sized" Force, not as small as navies such as the Australian Navy, but not nearly as big as the PLAN, USN, and if i recall my numbers correctly, Russian Navy.
Didnt we give them those ships? I thought we gave the japanese some of our ships. Cause those japanese ships looks like they should have been decommissioned 20-30 years ago.
RN's SSN's are far superior to the Japanese Diesel Electrics and they arn't handicapped by having to snorkel to recharge batteries. The UK has invested far more time and resources in hunting Subs the Nimrod is the best maritime patrol aircraft in the world and unlike the US Orion is undetectable to Subs. The Type 23 Frigate with it's towed array is arguably the best Sub hunter in the world. Even the Invincible class carriers were designed with ASW roles in mind.
Conclusion quite obvious* 1)the victory of local war is valueless as long as mainland is within the target of enemy missiles.2)each nations' humanity whether to launch missiles (with or without NUKE).4)tiny local invasion should be retaliated by receiving long-range missiles. Our beloved Japan, get hurried up to change the Constitution, article 9, then prepare long-range fatal missiles, then ships, subs, bombers will be unnecessary. Cheap and efficient self-defence concept.
(cont) wing assets, because of their post war agreement with the victories powers. Furthermore, none of its neighbors will allow it. The memories of Japanese Atrocities in world War II linger, and none of them will allow a Japanese Ship with fixed wing complement, ala a Aircraft Carrier. Hyuga and 19000t, while capable of being a light carrier, will never be more than a Helicopter Carrier in Japanese Service. Furthermore, one does not need a lot of ships to be highly capable.
@OnlyLifeMatters Japan is pretty weak in the game of diplomacy. All China has to do is to bring up the WW2 card to keep Japan in check. It is working so far in China's favor.
They're diligent and meticulous in their work, I'll give them that. But they are held back by America. Surely you realise that America's military base is not there just to 'protect' them.
@Sitti2300 Old japanese politicians may be retiring, but that doesn't mean Chinese people will forget events in WWII. As much as we have an issue with our own government, believe me when I say that we will give Japan what they deserve for what they did in WWII. I just hope mother nature doesn't get to have all the fun :)
Doesn't matter, as this is an eternal hatred. Japan's current generation may not be involved but they will pay for their ancestors actions. It's only a matter of time.
![[4K]海上自衛隊護衛艦あさぎり 関門東航 DD-151 JS ASAGIRI - JMSDF Asagiri-class destroyer - 2020](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KC7_scJ-pyc/mqdefault.jpg)
![[4K]海上自衛隊護衛艦あさぎり 関門東航 DD-151 JS ASAGIRI - JMSDF Asagiri-class destroyer - 2020](/img/tr.png)
日本海軍船は美しい。
I think so too
2004年。2015年の今よりずっと世界が平穏だった頃の映像だね。
当時の主力艦、はるな、あさかぜが日本を遠く離れてサンディエゴに行く余裕があった頃・・・
現在では105いなづま以外は退役した懐かしいあの日の思い出だなぁ。
今は海賊退治に自国・周辺諸国の地震津波等災害援助、近海の領域警戒など任務が多すぎて
主力艦がこんなに優雅に米西海岸に出向けるような余裕もなさそうだ・・・
平和な世界が戻ってきたらいいのにね
2021年からコンニチハ
The buzzing is caused by the ship's radar as it sweeps past the camcorder's location. The lower pitched buzz is from Fletcher and the higher pitched are from the Japanese ships.
Love the formation. They are very close each other that is awesome work.
Too close each other is bad idea all the way!
japanese navy ship good one torpedo to sunk. japan new ship operation dangerouse act again their imortal enemy now.japan now creat more idial like support ally sqad.
@UminoNuko Yes, it's sad to see them go. They were beautiful ships.
You can hear the microwaves emitted from 154 (in the form of interference with the video camera's electronics). Really great capture.
@KentuckyGiant That's the surface search radar you hear hitting the camera. Watch it rotate and when it swings around and is pointing at the the camera, the buzz appears. If you're standing on an upper deck and against a bulkhead, you can actually feel the energy each time one of those swings around, that is, as long as the ship is in close proximity.
And, for those who don't know, each of those weapons systems aboard the Japanese destroyers are made in the good old USA.
cool formation.
I served on the first USS Fletcher DD-445 and was allowed by the CO of the DD-992 to make this tiger cruise.
Japan. So pleased they accepted us as allies.
I stand corrected, the Arleigh Burke class has the ability to embark a single SH-60 Sea Hawk helicopter on board.
Those noises are caused by the various radar systems on the ships interfering with the camcorder as the beam sweeps past. The higher pitched noises come from the Japanese destroyers and the lower pitched noises from the American destroyer.
I was on the O'Kane, damn good memories out there, thanks for the vid.
IMPRESSIVE..!!
Cool, Japanese destroyers were at Pearl Harbor, crazy world. :)
A courtesy visit much the same as what the US Navy does in foreign ports. Perfectly normal and routine.
Japan needs to change Article 9 of the Constitution.
Yep
@CharlieDoan That's because most modern warships use much longer-range sophisticated weapons to engage targets. For example, cruise missiles, anti-ship missiles, sea to air missiles, etc. Also, it might be just one gun, but it is extremely accurate and lethal. A modern ship with one of these guns would probably win a battle against a WW2 battleship with enough range.
That being said, you're right, battleships and other ships with lots of guns do provoke much awe and a sense of power. ;)
A precious video that I saw for the first time. friendship with the United States.
great ships operation!
@OnlyLifeMatters Osumi class can't be considered as a "carrier". I think the Hyuga was more of the test platform for a true aircraft carrier.
Am I the only one who thinks is absolutely amazaing that 4 japanese destroyers were in Hawaii ca 60 years after their initial attack on the island... And now its like the US and Japanare best friends... I think its very very nice how mankind develops sometimes...
Hahaha
Yes
Those are some old boats, excellent navigation though.
ボイラー艦とガスタービン艦に艦の前後左右も狭く引き波も有り、それでも速度の乱れもなく走行するのは機関室も大変だったと思う。操艦技術のたまものですね。船乗りなら納得です!!
@OnlyLifeMatters
Also, Helicopter Destroyers are not "Carriers". The latest Hyuga Class i will in fact admit is a "Light Carrier" (In much the same way as the Brit Invincible class is), none of their other ships, such as the Haruna, shown in this video, is a Carrier. they are just destroyers with a higher than normal Helicopter Compliment (Haruna carries 3 SH-60s, as does Shirane, Arleigh Burke Flight II has full accommodations for 2).
Hyuga Carries up to 11 (Standard is 4).
@UminoNuko Does some country buy them up or are they sent to be dismantled?
great video... were you with the Fletcher long?
anyone know what this tight formation help in combat ? is it a way to trick enemy radar thinking it one big ship and maybe too big for a destroyer and they may think it a huge cargo boat or huge car carrier ?
Your missing the point, different ships for different roles. The Japanese Navy isn't geared up to fight a Submarine blockade or to clear mines. It's designed to support US Carrier Battle Groups and provide air defence of the Japanese mainland. If it came down to it the RNs Subs would rape the arse off the Japanese fleet, surface and subsurface.
Yes, they're destroyers. Fletcher herself had two helicopters on board. Today's more modern Arleigh Burke class destroyers don't have them, maybe that is what you're thinking of.
@yoleez8
China's Surface Fleet (Well, 57 of the 80 Major Combatants they have) are vintage 1950s designs for the most part. Russia's Pacific Fleet numbers just 5 Surface Ships (Which are for the most part probably not upkept the best or out of date) and just 3 Nuclear Attack Submarines.
The Korean Navy, the Japanese Navy, the American Pacific Fleet have them all soundly beaten.
Continue
However, the rule about the name of vessel(Ex. Asakaze) is adopted the rule used by the Imperial Japanese NAVY.
For instance:
The name of DDH uses as the old name of Japanese regions(Ex. "Hyuga" is the name of Miyazaki Pref. - located at the southern Kyushu. There is the birthplace of Japanese Naval Force in ancient time)
The name of DD is uses as the name of meteorological phenomina such as "Inazuma(the lightning)".
@OnlyLifeMatters We can only speculate what kind of role the Hyuga would have, but I am leaning towards to a sea-control/ASW for her for now. I can see her having a major refit with a heat-resistant deck and a ski jump if the China-Japan tension escalates. As for the 22DDH, that is definitely a light aircraft carrier.
かっこいい！Beautiful
@OnlyLifeMatters
Since when had Amphibious Assault Transports and Helicopter Destroyers (What the Hyuga and 19000t class are, not aircraft carriers, though they can easily been called such)
Furthermore, Invincible (22,000 tonnes) is a light carrier, while vessels such as Charles de Gaulle (37,000-42,000) and Giuseppe Garibaldi (27,000-30,000) are medium carriers. 19,000 tonnes is even smaller than a Invincible, and furthermore, the Japanese Ships are completely prevented from carrying fixed
@nitestryker7 yup!but that doesnt mean that they cant raise a powerful navy agian...
they actually have the kongo class DDG`s which is a copy of the u.s. navy`s arleigh burke class of destroyers. i also heard that they are building an aircraft carrier again. which is right there to the right>>>its called 16ddh hyuga
You may ask why JMSDF ship uses number?
The rule of classification about the JMSDF vessel uses as the same one using in U.S.N..
Because the JMSDF has historically re-built up by giving the reminder PFs & LSSLs from U.S.N. after the re-independence from Allied Nations in the mid of 1950s. Then, the rule of vessel's classifications has been "transplanted" from U.S.N..
Cont (Again)
The ROCN by itself can probably take half the PLAN Surface fleet with it, considering the massive technological difference between the Two (Over half of the PLANs surface ships are 1950s vintage, or 60s-70s. The oldest ROCN ships are Upgraded Knox Class ships from the late 60s-Early 70s, and their most powerful are their La Fayette mods and the Kidds, which are much more recent and much more powerful/advanced).
Also, the ROKN is much larger than the JMSDF on a ship basis (170-110)
Pretty much. China knows this isn't Hideki Tojo's Japan they are dealing with. If you recall that fishing boat incident last year, even though the Chinese vessel was clearly at fault by entering Japan's EEZ and tried to escape by ramming a JCG patrol craft. Government prosecutors bowed to China's constant demand to release the chinese boat captain.
The buzz was not audible while shooting the footage but it embedded itself on the audio track so it was audible later. Sometimes an AM radio will pick this up too and you can hear it live. In this video, watch the Japanese radars and you'll notice as they are facing me, the higher pitched buzz is audible.
mystery tackle box commercial is probally one of the first youtube commercials where i watched the whole thing.......weird.
Cont (Again again)
but has ~3x less displacement, because of a greater focus for Littoral Ships like Missile Boats and Offshore Patrol Ships given their coastal borders with the DPRK.
Their major combat vessels are every bit as capable as any of the JMSDF (Mainly because they both work off of the same systems as USN Burke Class and Ticonderoga class ships) and in one case, more powerful (King Sejong The Great Class / KDX-III, more armament than a Ticonderoga Class Cruiser)
odd i regard helicopters as an extremly important part of a ship arsenal and defence . .
Technically they're Arabic numerals that the Japanese, the USN and other navies use because they are widely recognized and understood.
japans navy may be small but is every bit as good as the american navy, their Kongos and Atagos are every bit as good as the american Arleigh Burkes, they may not have carriers, but their frigate navy is very good, America, Japan, and Australia, the 3 most powerful Pacific navies
Why does the big ship and only 1 or 2 Big guns. Instead shoot back to enemies when 2 ships shoot each others. Do they got any personal fire arms so the solders can shoot. I can't stand when I saw only 1 big gun in a big ship????
I'm sure we would have a similar type of surface fleet if we lived next door to China. All through the Cold War the Royal Navy was designed primarily for one of Anti Soviet Submarine operations and mine clearance. Different situations dictate the type of fleet you build. So its not really fair to say Japan has a better surface fleet.
Civilians on a US Navy Ship ??? Never seen this back in the 1960's !!!
Tiger Cruises were pretty common starting in the 1990s. I served in the late 60s on destroyers and in 1967 we once took a handful of dependents on a short cruise out of Pearl Harbor; that's the only time it happened although we did allow visitors on board for a handful of special events while in port.
I was in the Marines and spent a lot of time with the U S Navy being transported on APA's; AKA's; LST's; LSD's; LPH's; in the Atlantic and the Pacific. Also spent some time at Gitmo Bay and Subic Bay. The good old days.
@OnlyLifeMatters
Hardly big compared to the USN, and PLAN.
I will admit however, that when i made that comment, i was rather ignorant, it being 2 years ago. As evidenced a lot by the fact i completely forgot about the ROKN and the ROCN.
I would myself lable the JMSDF as a "Medium Sized" Force, not as small as navies such as the Australian Navy, but not nearly as big as the PLAN, USN, and if i recall my numbers correctly, Russian Navy.
how so?
japan has a better surface fleet then UK, seriously.
PEACE germany
S. Korea is glad to have an Allie Japan.
むらさめ型はいちばんイケメンな艦艇です。とおもったらここにはいなかった。
DD means most likliy destroyer guided missle
Is that a japanese sea hawk??
SH 60K ??
Yes.
" Im literally replying to to my self "
what about EVAs? :P
@nitestryker7 haha!wer u been for the past decades?
Okay, that I can't answer. Maybe someone else will read this and help us out.
@OnlyLifeMatters PLA's actions say otherwise. It is time for Japan to seriously rethink the Article 9.
Didnt we give them those ships? I thought we gave the japanese some of our ships. Cause those japanese ships looks like they should have been decommissioned 20-30 years ago.
They make they own ships,,,go to google earth and type "sasebo" japanese shipyard,,you can see there how they capture building a ship
im sure they got gundams and mobile suits hidden that SHIPS...lol
I thought they could only have defensive military and the US filled in the gaps.
RN's SSN's are far superior to the Japanese Diesel Electrics and they arn't handicapped by having to snorkel to recharge batteries. The UK has invested far more time and resources in hunting Subs the Nimrod is the best maritime patrol aircraft in the world and unlike the US Orion is undetectable to Subs. The Type 23 Frigate with it's towed array is arguably the best Sub hunter in the world. Even the Invincible class carriers were designed with ASW roles in mind.
Avance technology N1 Japan
Conclusion quite obvious* 1)the victory of local war is valueless as long as mainland is within the target of enemy missiles.2)each nations' humanity whether to launch missiles (with or without NUKE).4)tiny local invasion should be retaliated by receiving long-range missiles.
Our beloved Japan, get hurried up to change the Constitution, article 9, then prepare long-range fatal missiles, then ships, subs, bombers will be unnecessary. Cheap and efficient self-defence concept.
さすがですね伝統は継承されています。
ある意味で抑止効果です。
Didnt know Japanese were allowed to have destroyers.
lol i like how the top comment says : hericopter XD
Japanese destroyer feet is the second largest the world
banzai
its not fair but its a fact.
haahhah the evas xDddd!
well te japanese ships are very good against submarines. yes they cannot clear mines very well.
18 conventional vs 12 nuclear?
I wouldnt be to sure...
コンニチハ
(cont)
wing assets, because of their post war agreement with the victories powers. Furthermore, none of its neighbors will allow it. The memories of Japanese Atrocities in world War II linger, and none of them will allow a Japanese Ship with fixed wing complement, ala a Aircraft Carrier. Hyuga and 19000t, while capable of being a light carrier, will never be more than a Helicopter Carrier in Japanese Service.
Furthermore, one does not need a lot of ships to be highly capable.
@OnlyLifeMatters Japan is pretty weak in the game of diplomacy. All China has to do is to bring up the WW2 card to keep Japan in check. It is working so far in China's favor.
They're diligent and meticulous in their work, I'll give them that. But they are held back by America. Surely you realise that America's military base is not there just to 'protect' them.
@Sitti2300 Old japanese politicians may be retiring, but that doesn't mean Chinese people will forget events in WWII. As much as we have an issue with our own government, believe me when I say that we will give Japan what they deserve for what they did in WWII. I just hope mother nature doesn't get to have all the fun :)
アジアのひとりぽっち日本人 ww
Japenis army is not army
just 自衛隊 ww
Even if your country's military is so weak and small, don't envy other countries.
Doesn't matter, as this is an eternal hatred. Japan's current generation may not be involved but they will pay for their ancestors actions. It's only a matter of time.