Karen Read jury says they're deadlocked, judge sends them back to continue deliberating
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- The jury sent a note to the judge saying they can't come to a unanimous decision. WBZ-TV's Cheryl Fiandaca offers her insight into the case and what this situation entails.
I have not followed this case but how does a police officer die in mysterious circumstances while hanging around his police officer friends and that same police department leads the investigation? And then the jury must decide while living under the jurisdiction of this same police department? Perhaps they fear blowback from police who then investigate themselves
They didn't . Went to the state police ... And the lead investigator was friends with the home owner.
That's just the start of this mess.
@Channel99-1No, they did not.
@Channel99-1 If I were seeking truth and justice? Yes.
Karen found John immediately, under a foot of snow, raging blizzard, zero visibility right where she hit him. What a coincidence
Yannetti pleaded it was an accident. Then Jackson was called and made up the conspiracy
@maureen interesting!
All o know is I hope the real truth comes out. The defense has done one hell of a job if that’s the case!
I figured this might happen after day 2 and no verdict. So shocking that others saw something else during the trial then I did. I saw NO evidence against her.
Agreed
Absolutely agree 🤦@@koreyfournier1380
I saw no evidence that the victim was struck by a motor vehicle..
Also agree. I don’t think the CW met their burden at all- not even in the ball park. If the state retries KR, she’ll have to essentially pay for another trial. Crazy.
Did not meet the burden of proof , not even close!
The jury needs to be reminded of what reasonable doubt is.
If the cops can get away this easy folks, we are in big trouble as “free” citizens. This is about as corrupt as you get. Can’t believe this wait, can’t wait to hear what’s going on.
There’s got to be a McAlbert plant on that jury
I absolutely agree!!
I believe it
This is a solid deadlock. One wants guilty: the rest are for not guilty.
I'll never understand why ppl feel the need to assert and believe things they couldn't possibly know.
@@drewc771 Agreed 1000%
@@drewc771it’s everywhere and I drives me crazy
I think the prosecution didn't prove without reasonable doubt but still how can you possibly claim to know this haha why comment this? So dumb
No one noes if just one person is saying gulity and the rest is saying not gulity so stop already unless your in the same room with him u can't no how many are saying gulity and how many are saying not gulity.
Judge is only going to make the jury mad
Well that happened a long time ago.
That’s what I just said. If you aren’t letting me go home, I’m sticking to a NOT GUILTY verdict. The judge knows these people on the prosecution’s side. She should have recused herself.
@@deannabennett2589 jury .take your time.make her sweat
This judge is so biased. Worst judge ever
She knows the players personally, she should have excused herself.
Wrong, she just doesn’t make every ruling in favor of your position, is all.
Don’t blame the judge it’s not her fault she doing her job. She’s not saying that she’s guilty and She’s not saying that she’s is guilty. She does not make that call. That is the juries responsibility. She wants them to come to a conclusion Whether it be guilty or not guilty. I don’t blame her because of all the time they spent on this case it was 32 days of countless Exhibits, People coming in and testifying, Lawyers getting paid a lot of money, Jury sitting for 32 days, and the Judge Who has other court cases that she has to attend to Besides this one. On the other hand, do you understand that if they remain deadlocked, they will have to go back through this whole entire process with a new jury which means more time more money and more Wasting peoples time to come back to make the same testimonies. So I don’t blame her, she’s right they need to come to a conclusion whether it be guilty or not guilty
@@TBrl8 No, she is corrupt and biased. She should have recused herself immediately.
Facts!!!!!!
So the judge basically said don't come back until you have a guilty verdict.
Exactly right .. the entire bunch of them are crooked!
No the judge has said that the jury can’t possibly have had time to review all the evidence in the time given at this point and should continue deliberating. And I agree with her. I also believe there’s no way this can possibly be a guilty verdict.
Yeah, if you watch court trials you should know that this happens, the judge isn’t corrupt! It’s the process
Just another great example of how stupid our society has become.
They found Casey Anthony not guilty of murdering her daughter. Anything can happen when incompetence is in charge.
I wouldn’t say everyone is stupid as much information as they had to go over without having an incredible amount of conversation with others as well as the internet to rely upon. I think before I watched the trial I thought she was probably responsible for his death and although I don’t think they were all in on it that most likely a couple of dirty cops were behind it and everyone else just chose to stand behind their own.
@@KristiMcReynolds I would imagine its down to one person who isnt willing to budge
@@wo1463 The Ex cop!
@@KristiMcReynoldsshe? Karen? Responsible in what way? The plow operator would have seen his body and the lack of injury to show he was hit by a car say a not guilty verdict should have been reached in a few minutes, if not a few hours…..
This crooked JUDGE needs to allow the jury to make their decision not to make the jury go back in ! This is crazy its like the Judge is saying she is Guilty
Evidently you have not been watching the trial from the beginning or you would know that the judge is biased and would say she's guilty along with the prosecution
Oh I see now you did say she would be guilty my bad
If there is a Juror who thinks that Karen Read is Guilty, how will they ever come to a conclusion?
At some point they will call a hung jury and re-try her.
The ex cop on the jury undoubtedly is the hold up
I hope the federal investigation gets these officials. This is terrible
@@CZMuzic2714 why doesnt he want to stand up for the murdered cop?
@@Fatedcauze she is in jail correct?
We've investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing
The jury is tainted and needs to be investigated also
Cut it out. This is as a ridiculous assertion as the cult ideas being shared.
Omg everyone but Karen is guilty! You people are ridiculous!
That one actually made me laugh, because of the absurdity of the comment.
The jury doesn't know what we know...
I agree!
Yes they do you’re mentally ill get help.
Not Guilty what are they doing
Probably one hold out.
Purely, jury abuse!
Is this what a America as come to
Something is VERY wrong here.
Yes....she is so guilty 😔.
Well, I don’t blame the judge that’s a lot of time that’s a lot of money. I mean that was a very long case that was 32 days and now this is the fourth day that they’re waiting for a verdict. Not to mention the family that lost this man and the friends that lost his man. If They decide not to make a judgment and stay deadlocked and they will have to have Another case Another trial Meaning, More money and more time I don’t blame her for wanting to get Justice for their family so they can have closure. They need to come to a conclusion based What Think is fair and right.
She (corrupt judge) does not want justice! She wants Guilty.
Only about 10% of cases are hung
And it is normal for a judge to have them keep deliberating
Some judges have sent them back several times
Juries need to be made anonymous. I bet any money they're scared of cop retaliation. It was even said "This could happen to you".
What a mess. Get it together people.
I think there's one hold out for "guilty," most likely planted by the judge and/or mcalberts. They all have very far reaching connections.
This judge is unbelievable
Makes a person wonder with all of the irregularities & shenanigans going on with this case & trial, has a juror been compromised too?
The judge did recently dismiss one juror.
Absolutely!
Something SMELLS bad The CommonWealth of MASaChew sets .
Guilty
This judge won’t be satisfied until there is a guilty verdict! 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
I knew when those thugs should up in court
Yeah, I thought that was inappropriate
I smell more conspiracy.
Ok, give me Jury a Monopoly game board and some pillows for a Nap and check back in the morning.
Massachusetts is one hell of a state lol clowns
Well you had to figure we would have an idiot on the jury
The judge just continues to show a complete lack of professionalism. She should be removed from the bench and investigated immediately
Those jurers sat through testifying, experts, etc. for weeks. They already made up their minds before they started to deliberating. Surely the jurers were not asleep through the trial.
I can’t even imagine. OJ Guilty and was free. Karen Read, not guilty and goes to prison. What a world we live in. I’m praying it doesn’t turn out that way but it just might with tired Bev in control. But God is ultimately in CONTROL. We shall see what He says.
Couldnt they find the "not guilty" checkbox on the verdict slip?
This entire story stinks. Smells like everyone is scared of the Albert's.
This world is so full of hatred
Karen was expecting a “get old jail free” sentence……she killed the guy but lacks proof….love how everyone with out a life defends her like they know what happen……groupthink!
She's being framed by those police officers and their buddies.
Have you ever had a teacher/manager/boss that just doesn’t like you and you can feel how much they don’t like you in all your interactions? That’s how I feel about the judge/karen dynamic
The experts said he wasn’t hit by a car…what is going on
She said “I hit him, I hit him”.
But the experts proved she didn't@@TBrl8
@@TBrl8 You cannot argue the physics
@@TBrl8you mean the person who has been caught lying about multiple things said she said that she hit him then blatantly lied about her search history.
@@TBrl8 Exactly!!
I don’t know how anyone could be holding out for guilty given the evidence presented. Really unbelievable!
Omg you have to either be corrupt or it's A real STUPID PERSON/PERSONS!!!!!
Well, there is idiots out there
Truly unimaginable in this case! Wonder what ties it could be to the “dark” side? It makes you wonder … money talks & this town is SO crooked …
The lack of evidence you mean? Lol
She’s guilty as can be
This is absolutely ridiculous. There's a mountain of reasonable doubt. It is scary they don't seem to understand she does not have to be proven innocent (if this is even why they're deadlocked). Either way, what a disgrace.
Yes!! There’s a mountain of extreme doubt!
How can the Scientific evidence just be ignored?
Jury intimidation hmm I wonder who yes we know who.
Funny cop shows up dead at atf agents house and atf agent has fractured wrist,both victim and defendant phones scrubbed,yet police arrested girlfriend.
Government could frame you next,wake up America.
Corruption corruption corruption
The prosecution’s plant (most likely the appointed ex-cop foreman) can’t budge the others.
Can't believe he is on this njury
Conspiracy BS.
@@TBrl8how else? There’s no evidence?? Stop being ridiculous
OH PLEASE, THERE IS NO PLANT ON THE JURY!
@@Lildarlin1 never said there was a plant; I’m saying conflict of interest with defense going after police in this case; specifically this cadd
I knew this was coming. You think corruption doesn’t make it to the jury pool?
Hard to believe that anyone can't see the mountains of reasonable doubt.
Obviously there are two camps here. Believe the flashy conspiracy, or believe the evidence.
Absolutely ridiculous this should have been done already with not guilty
I wonder how many have been intimidated by the Albert, McCabe, Police
Brian A, Jenn, and Collin did see the jury. Bet they were scared if them.
@@cristipratt2844Zero zilch nada. You are living in the twilight zone if you think these people are intimidating. What kind of boring life are you all living that you fall for this complete set of made-up conspiracy theories by the Defense. How can the rational people get through to you all. It is just mind boggling what you will fall for. You do realize this is their goal and you have fallen prey to them.
QUESTIONS THAT NEED ANSWERS!!
I wonder how many have been intimidated by all the pink shirts outside?
But @ least the Snowplow Driver wasn't ...
Ex cop on jury is the problem guaranteed
That or a patsy
It wouldn't surprise me
X cop should have been disqualified
I just made that comment. @@sierravista9013
ABSOLUTELY or the fact that those SHADY McAlberts sat in that room to intimidate the jurors and I believe they have
how can they not be unanimous not guilty yet? Two reconstruction experts, hugely credentialed independent of the defense or the prosecution, say that "it is impossible that JO was hit by Karen's car" if her car didn't hit JO then none of the rest of it is possible. The end, period, end of discussion.
the ex-cop who the judge chose to be the jury foreman is probably a paid plant.
My guess is that the Jury foreman in charge has been chosen by the Judge and is bias and adamant that Karen Reed is guilty and the rest of the Jury are not going budge on their decision. We will probably find out the odd duck is a police officer.
We all understood the Judge was bias and didn’t even want to put a place for Not Guilty On the ballot for the jurors.
Because they are going by pictures. Pictures lie. They should have gone to scene.
Impossible to believe they have any doubt that she is NOT Guilty????
The judge chose the Foreman? Wow.
He's an ex-cop and most likely the paid plant.
@@lindafinch1520I do not doubt it one bit. This stuff happens!!!
@@lindafinch1520He's an x cop? I didn't know that. There seems to be something fishy going. After the FBI experts testified, there is no way they can say she hit him and caused him to die. Was Mr Albert in the courtroom to intimidate someone?
How is it not clear that there is reasonable doubt here???
Where is the ring footage or cctv from 34 fairview
Justice for John , free Karen
Exactly my belief.
The Karen Read fans can care less for John O’Keefe it’s all about free Killer Karen and harassing the O’Keefe family. Shameful shameful
@@judyberends7021justice for John find karen read guilty
Justice for Officer John O’keefe, JAIL Karen Read
@@barbaradodge1442 thank you sad not to many people care about his family.
I guess only some of the jurors have allowed themselves to be intimidated and coerced. Honestly, where is the Federal government?
As my Grandfather always said “They’re all in on it!”
There's no way a reasonable juror can listen to experts state categorically J.O was almost certainly not hit by a vehicle and not agree there's reasonable doubt as to the prosecution's claims
Agreed!
@@niahoward1920..How did he get his injuries
@@sarahmurphy8030 He has animal bites on his right arm. He has injuries to his face, the back of his head consistent with a fight and possible fall onto concrete. Also his phone recorded 60 steps after K.R dropped him off at the Alberts. The evidence is overwhelming. It's unbelievable the trial was even brought let alone there's a reasonable juror who thinks she's been proved guilty
@@Arthur_King_of_the_Britons agreed …100%
@@sarahmurphy8030
Did you not watch the trial?
This Is going in history of court cases.
For sure
Not at all...
@@THORR-mh9px really, you don't think so???
Not guilty by so much reasonable doubt
Very guilty....
So guilty....
This lady is absolutely not guilty! And if anyone thinks she is. I can only hope that they Never ever get picked for a trial. A person has be convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. There is tons of reasonable doubt in this case!
Doesn’t matter what side your on there simply is NOT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE. There is a difference between guilty and evidence to prove guilty.
Judge wants her guilyu
This judge wants a guilty verdict! They must be putting money in her pocket
Absolutely!!
Some people actually believe she’s guilty.
BIAS. I would NOT want to be a juror on this case. Not guilty should be their verdict
@@deannabennett2589 I wouldn’t either!
Oh boy, the conspiracy keeps growing..
Six men and six women jury. I wouldn't be surprised if they're stuck right down the middle. I don't see a verdict coming here.
Allegedly there is an ex cop on the jury. I wouldn’t be shocked if things were divided more on those lines. I’ve seen plenty of men saying they think she’s innocent
There’s so much reasonable doubt makes me wonder if they got to one of the jurors
She’s clearly not guilty.
Nope.GUILTY
Than why not verdict.
Obviously not
She is clearly SO Guilty....
Guilty 😔...
This is disgusting.
If they can do this to a person like Karen Read, a profesional, highly educated lady and citizen, with the means to hire a totally capable defense team, imagine what they would do to less fortunate citizens.
This is absurd and criminal.
What does a professional and highly educated lady and citizen have to do with it. Anyone can take part in an accidental, or deliberate act towards their significant other under the influence, coupled with anger. It happens more than we would like it to. And, it will happen again and again.
@@doloressosa4351 Just because she is educated and her family has deep pockets is a ridiculous reason to find her not guilty. John O'Keefe deserves justice. He is DEAD because of her actions. Ted Bundy was highly educated also.
@@doloressosa4351 If you've been watching from the beggining you would know she's being framed.
It’s a coverup.
Nice day.
People makes mistakes!! Every walk of life
@@Lildarlin1 Agree.
Not in this case.
The judge Can't make them find something That's Not there .💯 Not guilty !!!!!!
It’s there with the witnesses in the very beginning. They all heard her say she hit something, she said she hit him. That’s it. Only people that want to believe otherwise won’t see it.
All the crooked witnesses involved in a coverup, those witnesses have no credibility.
She also can't allow them to declare being deadlocked after such a short time in deliberations. Deadlocked means there is disagreement within the jurors, somewhere. So, while YOU might think they "can't find something that's not there", some members of the jury ARE finding something. The judge sending the jury back is so that they can further deliberate and try to work the issues out. Judges routinely do that. No one knows the split in a jury. It could be one holdout for guilty. It could be one holdout for not guilty. If a mistrial is declared, it means that this will have to be tried all over again, with a new jury. She won't be set free.....she will have to sit in prison until the process is repeated. I've seen people be retried, 3 and 4 times. So, cool your jets....it's best for everyone that the jury continues deliberations.
That's why the form was set~up the way it was, b4 Jackson called them out on it...
Exhausted jury is done ! To force any exhausted jurors to stay until decision is forcing a jury to say anything they possibly can just to get home and sleep !
It’s sad because the life of a woman is in their hands.
So which juror is being paid off by the prosecutors ?? Lmao
Told you! Deadlocked!!! Not at all surprised. And this case WILL NOT be retried.
It MUST BE RETRIED under the DUE PROCESS, which is allowed for EVERYONE under the CONSTITUTION. For the JUDGE to just send them back without declaring a MISTRIAL IS ILLEGAL AS HELL.
Yep
@@ayasreviewsandtoycolection7148 why do you feel the need to use caps. You’re either an emotional liberal or a narcissist assuming his/her audience are stupid.
A mistrial from deadlock is not a dismissal with prejudice, the Prosecution can retry the case given if it does not violate Read's due process right (speedy trial right) unless Read waived her right.
It's the same as the trial never happened, which mean the Prosecution have 6 months to retry Read. If they had not refiled the case in 6 months, then the speedy trial right of Read will be violated, and she cannot be retired again.
Get a f life.
Seriously? How could anyone on the jury convict her? The trial showed us all what a crock of an investigation it was.
I expected a verdict same day .. this is wild
Is Trouper Proctor in there with them?
This goes to show that there are some jurors who are not buying the prosecutions bull.
And some jurors are not buying Jackson’s story either, you seem to fail to understand.
I would guess its 80% of them that think she is innocent. It only takes 1 person to hold up all the others, and it only takes one McAlbert pocket jury member to hold them up.
She's a DIRTY Judge!!!
No, just your undergarments
You have no way of knowing that, it's a slanderous claim.
@@patricias5122 yep
@@freddyjisp6452 yeah ok
@@freddyjisp6452 how funny.
The Judge wants a Guilty Verdict, how insane
The case was flawed. There was only one cause of death explored and that cause was not proven beyond doubt.
The jury deliberated 2 hours on Tuesday,
Went home early on Wednesday,
Went home early on Thursday,
And on Friday, only 3 hours before they told the judge they are deadlocked!
Karen Read’s life is in their hands, but they don’t seem to care.
Alan Jackson presented all the evidence, forensic told them that Boston police Officer John O'Keefe injuries weren’t from her SUV.
One of the final witnesses was a retired forensic pathologist who testified Monday that some of O'Keefe's injuries were inconsistent with being struck by the Lexus SUV.
Clear as water, and this jurors can’t see it.
Of course the judge would say this !
Yes she is so biased
She’s that teacher no one wanted.
She is the one that said I hit him
Jury is probably considering that
Angry Jackson. Not a slam dunk after all
I cannot stand her smirk and smiles.
TIME WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE! Just great to see that there are Jury members … THAT CHOICE NOT TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY!!!
I served on a jury in Massachusetts and we deliberated for 3 days and we were sent back twice But we did come to a unanimous verdict in the end
I'm in MA too. Been called up 2x but not picked for jury. Would like to serve in a criminal case.
What was the breakdown of guilty vs not guilty votes when you were initially deadlocked?
So is the judge holding the jury hostage until they come back with a guilty verdict WTH
I will bet anything its onle ONE JUROR who is holding out on "not guilty." We will later find out they are a friend of ones of the families.
How about talking about the family who lost their son and a brother. How about talking about how good man he was to take the responsibility of his sister children. How about a man that was present when his sister was dying of cancer. It is sad all you talk is about Karen and nothing about the poor man that was killed! The judge is doing her job. All I hope is for the truth of what happened to this young man. Karen is a very intelligent and clever woman. I have questions about her. She is the only one that know the truth.
Makes you wonder what goes on in the mind of a scoypath
Corrupt cops and corrupt prosecutors
She is so guilty....
Yanetti is right but there goes BIAS BEV!!!!
LISTEN TO THE VERB-AGE USED BY THE JURY!!!!
THEY NEED TO POLL THE JURY PRIVATELY OR BEFORE THE COURT.
YES!!!
They will.
Hopefully jury will take more days .KR is SOOOO GUILTY
@@49ersfan62 nah she's not
@@americanbeauty4015 yeah she is.i have a right to my opinion
Deadlocked! Did they vet that jury? It is blatantly obvious this woman is innocent. 🤬
Why do they find the most idiotic jurors for high profile cases! Don’t get me started on the judge
If the Jury said, "they exhausted all efforts & CAN'T come to an agreement". That's an automatic mis-trial. This Judge making them go back & deliberate is a blatantly disregard to the Jurors decision!!!
Not it's not. I was on a jury and the same thing happened. Got sent back.
Exactly the judge is looking for a guilty verdict
They usually do that once or twice.
No....calm down. You're a friend of the defendant. That is very typical for a hung jury. You are making a fool of yourself.
@@tinafelicianoedwards8398 Good grief, the level of ignorance about the judicial system among these RUclipsrs is appalling.
They can’t have access to that report. AND they don’t have the transcripts.
8 weeks of long days and they’re expected to go off of their notes? Of which the judge had specified instructions on.
All with the extra long instructions and the change of that verdict slip, it is in fact too much to handle sitting in a closed room with 11 strangers all day with the clock ticking knowing that the world is waiting.
This controversial case shouldn’t have been accepted in the first place. This is jury abuse!
Not jury abuse that's their job and if they didn't want it they should have said so from get Go
@@dianesweat6015 Would you have known what you’re getting into from the get go? Over 8 weeks of testimony, over 650 exhibits, no transcripts to go back to, and then, all the crippling instructions. I couldn’t do this by myself over several hours, let alone getting pushed to sort all that with 11 others to convince.
Never ever have i seen a judge try so hard to have someone convicted. She has lied and claimed karen was smearking hoping to change the mind of people watching she has spoke so rude and uneducated. She should be dis bared
Karen WAS smirking throughout the trial, which struck me as an odd demeanor, as well. And I'm sure the jury took notice of that, too. A person's behaviors, appearance, mannerisms are all carefully watched by a jury, and can leave a lasting impression with them. The judge is there to keep the court in order, make sure the law is followed, and to assist in any issues that come up between lawyers. She must ethically remain unbiased, but that doesn't mean she won't scold lawyers or anyone else if she feels they are behaving unprofessionally. She isn't there to be the social welcoming staff. She is there to rule over the case.
Can’t even trust a jury of your peers these days.. our system is over
Dirty judge. Disbarment
You have proof, correct
Karen the terrible...