I've been following this channel for a while now and I'm continually impressed by the quality of content, especially when it comes to understanding the intricacies of muscle growth. Your emphasis on time under tension as the key driver for hypertrophy really resonates with me. It's fascinating how this method is aimed at exhausting the fast-twitch fibers to tap into and grow the more fatigue-resistant Type 2 fibers. Your explanation on going to failure shed a new light on the subject for me. It's not just about the pump; it's about recruiting maximum motor units for force production. When we push to failure, especially with a 2-3 second isometric contraction, we're not just working hard; we're working smart by ensuring every muscle fiber recruited contributes to growth, thanks to the all or none principle. This depth of knowledge is what keeps me coming back for more. Keep up the great work!
This is fascinating and seems very wise/smart. As someone who wants to pursue calisthenics for health, but is NOT an athlete and does NOT seek to become an "Expert" (capital 'E') on the topic, RDP videos are proving very helpful and interesting to me.
Muscles are attached to Bones via tendons and ligaments through Origins and insertions... and stabilizer muscles and synergistically and other muscles come into play.
So, what this leaves out is the skill component? Almost any calisthenics or strength move requires some degree of coordination and learning to perform the move efficiently. Sounds like a reasonable plan is to use isometrics to improve strength leaving calisthenics work to be structured as less fatiguing practice, learning how to do the move confidently with good form (and no doubt including some reps/sets to gain move specific strength)?
True, there's always some degree of skill in any form of training, and the skill is always specific to the disicpline you're practicing, but yes, isometrics is relatively low-skill which makes it much easier to work the muscles for both time and tension
Off topic, new here and looking for a starting point . How to get started with a workout . I am over 60 yo . Doing a balance workouts of walks , stretching, resistance training thur body weight exercise . Love your approach of work smarter not harder . I am working out for 5 plus hours a week as I described. Looking for a starting point of getting the most the easiest way. Been walking and doing IF fasting for years , stretching a few months and just restarted weight training a month. I am disabled (hip replacement)/ on disability/ retired so have free time. Ok Matt I am looking for a program or one of your books to start with please advise .
@@titolino73i mean, yes. But i have done them and in some cases it can help better than dynamic excercises. Obviously, i also had a better experiencie doing dynamic stuff, but i think isos are kinda underrated and i still implement this in my training and i have got great results and i encourage you to try them as well, they are worth it.
Progress is practically automatic. It's primarily driven by how much tension you generate, and how well you maintain it along with the coordinate of other muscles. Again, it's almost something that you don't need to regulate as it's largely on auto-pilot
Are you still using the Iso Max? I purchased the stand alone bar but debating keeping it as I'm concerned about the longevity of the electronics unlike the Bullworkers I own that with that withstood time.
So studies suggest (or proof, can't remember) that overcoming isometrics contribute to strength for around a few degrees of range of motion. What's your take on it? The Bioneer, for instance, says you should use more than one position, for example for the biceps, something like 30, 60, 90 and 120 to maximise on strength within the whole range of motion.
Have you seen this video on it? He mentions some of the stuff I read in the book 'The Ultimate Isometrics Manual: Building Maximum Strength and Conditioning with Static Training by Paul Wade (Author), Dan John (Foreword).' highly recommended book even if it does advertise the Isochain quite a bit. ruclips.net/video/UuMtiFhwo58/видео.html
I like some things about his channel, but I can guess without having to watch a Bioneer vid that his answer to any question will probably be "Do MORE!!"
If you work from your weakest angle you add strenght to the entire range of motion of that joint, plus strenghtening the tendons and adding mobility and flexibility. It's a "win-win"!
The argumentation makes no sense. The stimulus of dynamic training comes from the time you have all your muscle fibers near to exhaustion. You need to get your movement close to failur to ensure that all fibers are used and exhausted. At least that is as far as i know the current understanding of it. Just bringing all your fibers to produce their maximal force via isometric does not immediately exhaust them. Also, the time spent near exhaustion is, if you just do it for a moment, much shorter. Your argumention ignores all that. Based on the current understanding on how muscle grow via dynamic training one should hold the maximal force in isometric training as long as the forceprudction starts to significantly decrease. That would be the equivalent to failure and exhaustion. Assuming that you have the disciplin to always push as hard as you can, i would assume that te time to exhaustion remains more or less constant, but i don't know that. I have no real experience with iso. In my small experience with iso doing that is the most difficult part is why dynamic movement is for me so far the by far better and more reliable way. It is just hard to keep the force maximal and to be sure about it. Moving a wait simplifies that: you can see if you are moving it or not. Anyway, your argumentation makes no sense to me due to the reasons i explained. Looking forward to some answers or clarifications. Maybe i misnderstood you.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
This is one of the most important fitness videos on RUclips
I've been following this channel for a while now and I'm continually impressed by the quality of content, especially when it comes to understanding the intricacies of muscle growth. Your emphasis on time under tension as the key driver for hypertrophy really resonates with me. It's fascinating how this method is aimed at exhausting the fast-twitch fibers to tap into and grow the more fatigue-resistant Type 2 fibers. Your explanation on going to failure shed a new light on the subject for me. It's not just about the pump; it's about recruiting maximum motor units for force production. When we push to failure, especially with a 2-3 second isometric contraction, we're not just working hard; we're working smart by ensuring every muscle fiber recruited contributes to growth, thanks to the all or none principle. This depth of knowledge is what keeps me coming back for more. Keep up the great work!
Thank You for clarifying the relationship between programming to isometrics. You've brought liberation once again to our workouts.
My pleasure Terry, happy training!
This is fascinating and seems very wise/smart. As someone who wants to pursue calisthenics for health, but is NOT an athlete and does NOT seek to become an "Expert" (capital 'E') on the topic, RDP videos are proving very helpful and interesting to me.
Muscles are attached to Bones via tendons and ligaments through Origins and insertions... and stabilizer muscles and synergistically and other muscles come into play.
Isometrics and tendon stiffness. Its a beautiful bond.
I remember the Bullworker ads from 40 years ago. Just looked it up. It costs 2.5 X more than I thought it would.
Your content is top notch bro
Always a delight to watch your videos and read your books
Matthas been coaching me on this and it is great! I have seen some good progress in a little amount of time. It is crazy, but it works!
Wonderful to hear Bill! Keep up the good work
Bill, can you describe your training method/details?
So, what this leaves out is the skill component? Almost any calisthenics or strength move requires some degree of coordination and learning to perform the move efficiently. Sounds like a reasonable plan is to use isometrics to improve strength leaving calisthenics work to be structured as less fatiguing practice, learning how to do the move confidently with good form (and no doubt including some reps/sets to gain move specific strength)?
True, there's always some degree of skill in any form of training, and the skill is always specific to the disicpline you're practicing, but yes, isometrics is relatively low-skill which makes it much easier to work the muscles for both time and tension
Off topic, new here and looking for a starting point . How to get started with a workout . I am over 60 yo . Doing a balance workouts of walks , stretching, resistance training thur body weight exercise . Love your approach of work smarter not harder . I am working out for 5 plus hours a week as I described. Looking for a starting point of getting the most the easiest way. Been walking and doing IF fasting for years , stretching a few months and just restarted weight training a month. I am disabled (hip replacement)/ on disability/ retired so have free time.
Ok Matt I am looking for a program or one of your books to start with please advise .
Thank you! The finer details are just what I needed.
Thanks for the video mate - that was quick!!
I got a world fit iso trainer last week best thing I've even got
Did you see his interview with the 63 year old guy who does isometrics? His muscles are pretty impressive.
I love isometric because it reduces systematic fatigue, which helps maximize muscular fatigue.
Will never be like at the gym if you want to grow your muscles
@@titolino73i mean, yes. But i have done them and in some cases it can help better than dynamic excercises. Obviously, i also had a better experiencie doing dynamic stuff, but i think isos are kinda underrated and i still implement this in my training and i have got great results and i encourage you to try them as well, they are worth it.
You might like ARX, as it invokes the same aspects you mention, but w/movement.
third variable is position re isometric exercise
You have the best information, very logical
how does isometrics effect the volume you should do in resistance training
what about metabolic fatigue and muscle damage factors
Well explained! Your book also is really good :-)
How do you progress in isometrics, anyway? Just add time?
Progress is practically automatic. It's primarily driven by how much tension you generate, and how well you maintain it along with the coordinate of other muscles. Again, it's almost something that you don't need to regulate as it's largely on auto-pilot
@matt, could you see the value in using overcoming isometrics to train for a one arm pullup?
Yes. Overcoming Isos were key to my getting one arm pullups.
What about muscle growth? Especially for legs
Are you still using the Iso Max? I purchased the stand alone bar but debating keeping it as I'm concerned about the longevity of the electronics unlike the Bullworkers I own that with that withstood time.
Good information sir
@Matt
Could I use isometrics to build up to a one arm pushup?
It can certainly help, especially if you practice pressing one arm at a time isometrical to help build the stability in the shoulder.
Love you Matt
So studies suggest (or proof, can't remember) that overcoming isometrics contribute to strength for around a few degrees of range of motion. What's your take on it? The Bioneer, for instance, says you should use more than one position, for example for the biceps, something like 30, 60, 90 and 120 to maximise on strength within the whole range of motion.
Have you seen this video on it? He mentions some of the stuff I read in the book 'The Ultimate Isometrics Manual: Building Maximum Strength and Conditioning with Static Training by Paul Wade (Author), Dan John (Foreword).' highly recommended book even if it does advertise the Isochain quite a bit.
ruclips.net/video/UuMtiFhwo58/видео.html
I think its a myth. IF you do isometrics you should gain strength within a wider range of motion then they suggest. Test it out for yourself.
I like some things about his channel, but I can guess without having to watch a Bioneer vid that his answer to any question will probably be "Do MORE!!"
If you work from your weakest angle you add strenght to the entire range of motion of that joint, plus strenghtening the tendons and adding mobility and flexibility. It's a "win-win"!
Think isometric exercise through out the body or rather the biomechanical body chain.
Gooood 🔥🔥🔥
Deep
You would get hernias everywhere of u went hard on isometrics. Clearly the tension is not the same
Algo
Can’t work without gravitized load. And you know this
The argumentation makes no sense. The stimulus of dynamic training comes from the time you have all your muscle fibers near to exhaustion. You need to get your movement close to failur to ensure that all fibers are used and exhausted. At least that is as far as i know the current understanding of it.
Just bringing all your fibers to produce their maximal force via isometric does not immediately exhaust them. Also, the time spent near exhaustion is, if you just do it for a moment, much shorter.
Your argumention ignores all that. Based on the current understanding on how muscle grow via dynamic training one should hold the maximal force in isometric training as long as the forceprudction starts to significantly decrease. That would be the equivalent to failure and exhaustion.
Assuming that you have the disciplin to always push as hard as you can, i would assume that te time to exhaustion remains more or less constant, but i don't know that. I have no real experience with iso. In my small experience with iso doing that is the most difficult part is why dynamic movement is for me so far the by far better and more reliable way. It is just hard to keep the force maximal and to be sure about it. Moving a wait simplifies that: you can see if you are moving it or not.
Anyway, your argumentation makes no sense to me due to the reasons i explained. Looking forward to some answers or clarifications. Maybe i misnderstood you.
funny intro
Talking alone doesn't work for me. I don't know why.
fIRST
Isometric or static hold is not hypertrophy training... that means you will not build bigger muscles.
m.ruclips.net/video/RlDnLqD4Rgc/видео.html
Haha try telling that to arm wrestlers 💪 I got my arms to 18.5 inches with only isometrics but maybe that's not big to you