A well-done ad for RR aviation industries. Yes, the narration is probably a robot, but very naturalistic in tone and timbre. The script is not AI as it was educational, interesting and non-repetitive, and explained complex technology well beyond the ability of some robot. Clearly scripted by a RR Team of human engineers.
It’s more than the voice. The script appears A.I. generated. I can’t prove it, but I’m noticing many scripts on videos contain small repetitions of ideas, as if this section of the script isn’t aware the setup for the next phrase was made a paragraph earlier. Here it overuses “uses innovation” when that setup point had already been made. I’d love some feedback on this idea. It could be confirmation bias because I’m never told if the script is A.I.
Because it' AI, and it learned about the wheel once again while writing this. It's new to them every time. They do not seem to have a continual stream of consciousness, even if accessed on a device where they can go over the transcript of everything previously discussed. The Forgetful Friend.
Its an advance in technology but still nothing new. Its still a turbine. When a totally new concept comes along that is truly innovative that is quiet, offers much greater thrust with a new clean energy source let me know.
@@JongJande So many RUclips videos add unnecessary music. Sometimes a very light background sound seems OK, maybe added to keep the video from sounding like a lecture. But so often it is intrusive.
1:20 - It is NOT the turbine that is "high bypass" it is the FAN. High bypass ratio is how much more air goes past the core of the engine as opposed to through the core of the engine. Dumb mistake. Clearly should not be talking about plane engines.
Let’s be realistic. The new or future engines will still consume enormous quantities of fossil fuel and produce very much noise. For example, half of the noise is only a 3 dB reduction, not noticeable for many people. All types of combustion engines are by nature very inefficient. Most of what they produce is heat that cannot be used.
A lot of promesses, but we are still waiting for real results. And nothing new. As stated, RR is catching up to their competitors who are already in service. As usual the title is simply a lie.
Hello . I'd been watching a video in which CFM is developing a open blade design ,much like the old Turbo Props . Has RR been sinking money into the wrong product ?
I will not bet a single dollar on this Rolls engine. There is nothing new in terms of technology. Adding a gearbox behind the fan generates more problems than it provides efficiency. The main one being reliability. It’s interesting to see that Rolls Royce was part of the IAE consortium which provided the V2500 engine and that they stopped this partnership when Pratt came with the GTF as a successor of the V2500. And now they put their money in a geared engine 😳. The main concern of a geared engine is to have all the thrust to be transmitted to the fan through a metal to metal contact in a gearbox. Even with the best efficiency of a gearbox, a quick estimate gives you the amount of heat generated and the cooling concerns it brings with it. This is not a new concept and if it was so efficient it would be widely used in the industry. In the video it is stated that Rolls Royce came to the 3 shafts design to have all modules rotating at their optimum speed. This is a false statement because the fan is still driven by the Low Pressure Turbine like in any 2 spools engine. As stated in another comment, the CFM RISE engine which is an open rotor engine is the only potential game changer today. Time will tell.
@@sundar999 yes, it was true at that time. But the main reason for the decline in interest for the project was the price of the oil which went back down. In the presentation made by CFM for the RISE project, they say that the engine is as quiet as the actual engines in service. I don’t know if this is true but anyway this type of engine requires a new type of aircraft so maybe the combination is gonna be as quiet as the actuals A320s or B737s.
@ When you fly in a turboprop aircraft such as the ATR and you are seated close to the engines, you realize how noisy it is when the pilot shuts it down. But as this technology brings the ticket price down, you fly it anyway. If this open rotor technology can do the same, people will fly it. Most of the people don’t care about the aircraft or engine type they fly. The only element they look for is the ticket price.
Are you familiar with GE’s new 9X? It’s produces +30% more power than what presently exists by any RR engine as well as the engines on the A350-1000. GE is thus leading presently. I would not sell short Boeings eventual ruin around on the 777X.
Within the aircraft engine industry, GE leads the market with a 55% share, followed by Pratt & Whitney at 26% and Rolls-Royce at 18%! Rolls-Royce is just playing catch up to Pratt & Whitney, which is designing its own geared turbo fan engine.
I see one future path could be one or more small, constant rpm jet engines within the fuselage (ie super-apus) driving electric generators feeding big bypass fans driven by electric motors. Place batteries in the loop as their power/weight ratio improves.
No! Think about this for a moment. The UltraFan's gear is rated at 64MW. Care to explain how to fit 64MW electric generators, batteries, and motors on a plane?
Can you get your bs AI voiceover to say things correctly. It's the RB two-eleven and the Lockheed L ten-eleven or Tri-star. The development of the RB 211 bankrupted Rolls Royce which had to be bailed out by the UK government. The aero engine division based in Derby (pronounced Darby) was split off from the car maker based in Crewe.
A geared fan engine architeture is now new nor is it revolutionary technology. Piston, turboprop and bypass jet engines have been using it for many years.
Greate step by RR. Avoiding the three-spool architecture by using a planetary gearbox enabling to set the optimum rotational speeds of both the LP-turbine and the fan independent. The gear ration seems to be around 4 estimated from the pic of the gearbox.
Geared turbofans are still not in commercial use and won't be until ~2030. The biggest issue will be long-term reliability. The Rolls-Royce gearbox is rated at up to 64MW! The P&W gearbox is about 22MW. GE focuses on an open fan design instead (CFM RISE engine).
@@hakantorstensson8053 To my understanding, the CFM RISE will not use a gear. Feel free to provide any publicly available information on that if you found any. The engine market has until about 2030 to develop the next-generation that is significantly more fuel efficient. This will require a number of technological advancements, including better fan blade design. However, the main driver for fuel efficiency for P&W is the gear and for CFM the open fan design. Doing both at the same time would be too expensive and too risky for CFM. The open fan design is already pretty risky. RR is a distant third in the engine market, only playing catch up.
Potentially really interesting video. Can’t help noticing how you managed to select a piece of background music that annoys 90% of viewers. Irrelevant. Irritating. Annoying. Pointless!
This could have been so much better without the stupid AI narration!! The rhythm and expression of the human voice can make these things so much more interesting- instead, the cold clinical voice that keeps coming at you without the natural pauses between ideas etc is so boring and annoying. I hate to think that too many people are just getting used to this crap.
The future of commercial aviation is AIRBUS, BOEING, GENERAL ELECTRIC and PRATT & WHITNEY. Rolls Royce engines are too expensive to manufacture and maintain. RR Trent 1000 engines were a failure on the Boeing 787 and for this reason, Air NZ; Al Nippon, LATAM, Thai Airways, Ethiopian Airlines, British Airways and Air Tanzania have rejected substandard RR engines and chosen to power their future Boeing 787 airliners with GEnx engines. More than likely other airlines will follow this trend. The Trent engines have poor on-wing time on the A380 and the A350 1000 and for this reason Emirates Airlines rejected the A350-1000, favoring the Boeing 777-8 and 777-9 with GE engines for their future widebody airliners.
GE and Pratt & Whitney corner most of the engine market. Both are US companies. Rolls-Royce is British and has only a small fraction of the market. Ignorance is bliss and nonsensical politics plays no role at any of these companies.
No human would say "A 3 hundred and 80", just A3 80. But still an interesting video.
A well-done ad for RR aviation industries. Yes, the narration is probably a robot, but very naturalistic in tone and timbre. The script is not AI as it was educational, interesting and non-repetitive, and explained complex technology well beyond the ability of some robot. Clearly scripted by a RR Team of human engineers.
Hat off to Rolls Royce in landing a $2.6billion order to re-engine the entire 82 strong US B-52 fleet with their R-130 engines.
It’s more than the voice. The script appears A.I. generated. I can’t prove it, but I’m noticing many scripts on videos contain small repetitions of ideas, as if this section of the script isn’t aware the setup for the next phrase was made a paragraph earlier. Here it overuses “uses innovation” when that setup point had already been made. I’d love some feedback on this idea. It could be confirmation bias because I’m never told if the script is A.I.
I think this comment is AI generated.
@@CelticMagic yours or mine? 🤔
@@pbinnj3250 mine
Hats off the brilliant engineers at RR who come up with these concepts and then have the ability to actually build them!
You know what sucks about this video? The AI voice and the lack of proper editing after the voice screws something up.
Educational 🏆👑🙏🏿
The improvements in large jet engine design are impressive. I wonder what is happening with smaller jet engines.
Maybe a different robot voice so this won't tend to be boring??
But this a commercial.
@@devroombagchus7460 The voices are getting much better. This one's pretty good...but I still hear the robot and I hate it.
Why do we have to go all the way back to the stone age every time there’s a tech report?! Just speak and show what the big news is FFS
Americans. So entitled they can’t even scroll forward.
Because they need to stretch the vids in order to place more ads.
Because it' AI, and it learned about the wheel once again while writing this. It's new to them every time. They do not seem to have a continual stream of consciousness, even if accessed on a device where they can go over the transcript of everything previously discussed.
The Forgetful Friend.
Its an advance in technology but still nothing new. Its still a turbine. When a totally new concept comes along that is truly innovative that is quiet, offers much greater thrust with a new clean energy source let me know.
Yeah
What is the added value of the annoying musak?
Huh. I never even noticed -'till you _mentioned_ :>)
@@JongJande So many RUclips videos add unnecessary music. Sometimes a very light background sound seems OK, maybe added to keep the video from sounding like a lecture. But so often it is intrusive.
Get rid of the background music.
RB “Two Hundred Eleven.” Airbus “A-three hundred thirty.” Ditch the computer voice and just read the script! Your work will be better for it.
I didn't know any of this Thank you for the video.
You have a typo in the headline.
Actually, two: New Rolls Royce Engine iS coming and will RevoluTionary the Entire Aviation Industry
We apologize
@@insane.US-A revolutionize
@@halamish1 Revolutionise is spelt with an 's' in England where English comes from and is spoken properly and without an accent, sparsely.
1:20 - It is NOT the turbine that is "high bypass" it is the FAN. High bypass ratio is how much more air goes past the core of the engine as opposed to through the core of the engine. Dumb mistake. Clearly should not be talking about plane engines.
Let’s be realistic. The new or future engines will still consume enormous quantities of fossil fuel and produce very much noise. For example, half of the noise is only a 3 dB reduction, not noticeable for many people. All types of combustion engines are by nature very inefficient. Most of what they produce is heat that cannot be used.
Don't fly
True, but whats the alternative
But they do a really good job. Each day millions of people fly across the world in airliners powered by high-bypass turbofan engines.
A lot of promesses, but we are still waiting for real results.
And nothing new. As stated, RR is catching up to their competitors who are already in service.
As usual the title is simply a lie.
Yeah
Hello . I'd been watching a video in which CFM is developing a open blade design ,much like the old Turbo Props . Has RR been sinking money into the wrong product ?
The money is in the right place, but using CFM gear technology as well as Pratt and Whitney
I will not bet a single dollar on this Rolls engine. There is nothing new in terms of technology. Adding a gearbox behind the fan generates more problems than it provides efficiency. The main one being reliability.
It’s interesting to see that Rolls Royce was part of the IAE consortium which provided the V2500 engine and that they stopped this partnership when Pratt came with the GTF as a successor of the V2500. And now they put their money in a geared engine 😳. The main concern of a geared engine is to have all the thrust to be transmitted to the fan through a metal to metal contact in a gearbox. Even with the best efficiency of a gearbox, a quick estimate gives you the amount of heat generated and the cooling concerns it brings with it. This is not a new concept and if it was so efficient it would be widely used in the industry.
In the video it is stated that Rolls Royce came to the 3 shafts design to have all modules rotating at their optimum speed. This is a false statement because the fan is still driven by the Low Pressure Turbine like in any 2 spools engine.
As stated in another comment, the CFM RISE engine which is an open rotor engine is the only potential game changer today. Time will tell.
The open blade types so far tested were too noisy to be worthwile a continued development I've heard
@@sundar999 yes, it was true at that time. But the main reason for the decline in interest for the project was the price of the oil which went back down. In the presentation made by CFM for the RISE project, they say that the engine is as quiet as the actual engines in service. I don’t know if this is true but anyway this type of engine requires a new type of aircraft so maybe the combination is gonna be as quiet as the actuals A320s or B737s.
@ When you fly in a turboprop aircraft such as the ATR and you are seated close to the engines, you realize how noisy it is when the pilot shuts it down. But as this technology brings the ticket price down, you fly it anyway. If this open rotor technology can do the same, people will fly it. Most of the people don’t care about the aircraft or engine type they fly. The only element they look for is the ticket price.
Who would've thought to combine power and efficiency.
The future of commercial aviation is AIRBUS and ROLLS ROYCE.
It's a good partnership
Are you familiar with GE’s new 9X? It’s produces +30% more power than what presently exists by any RR engine as well as the engines on the A350-1000. GE is thus leading presently. I would not sell short Boeings eventual ruin around on the 777X.
Within the aircraft engine industry, GE leads the market with a 55% share, followed by Pratt & Whitney at 26% and Rolls-Royce at 18%! Rolls-Royce is just playing catch up to Pratt & Whitney, which is designing its own geared turbo fan engine.
I see one future path could be one or more small, constant rpm jet engines within the fuselage (ie super-apus) driving electric generators feeding big bypass fans driven by electric motors. Place batteries in the loop as their power/weight ratio improves.
No! Think about this for a moment. The UltraFan's gear is rated at 64MW. Care to explain how to fit 64MW electric generators, batteries, and motors on a plane?
how is it going to revolutionize anything if it is a competitor .... meaning the same as already existing engine?
Can you get your bs AI voiceover to say things correctly.
It's the RB two-eleven and the Lockheed L ten-eleven or Tri-star.
The development of the RB 211 bankrupted Rolls Royce which had to be bailed out by the UK government. The aero engine division based in Derby (pronounced Darby) was split off from the car maker based in Crewe.
YEAH
A geared fan engine architeture is now new nor is it revolutionary technology.
Piston, turboprop and bypass jet engines have been using it for many years.
But, that's just a detail
Geared turbofans are still not in commercial use and won't be until ~2030! There are significant technical challenges, like long-term reliability.
If the grammar and spelling of the title is any guide, this will not be an entirely credible video.
We apologize and have already made the correction.
Greate step by RR. Avoiding the three-spool architecture by using a planetary gearbox enabling to set the optimum rotational speeds of both the LP-turbine and the fan independent. The gear ration seems to be around 4 estimated from the pic of the gearbox.
good observation
Geared turbofans are still not in commercial use and won't be until ~2030. The biggest issue will be long-term reliability. The Rolls-Royce gearbox is rated at up to 64MW! The P&W gearbox is about 22MW. GE focuses on an open fan design instead (CFM RISE engine).
@@charliefoxtrot5001 The CFM RISE includes a gearbox as well as I understand.
@@hakantorstensson8053 To my understanding, the CFM RISE will not use a gear. Feel free to provide any publicly available information on that if you found any.
The engine market has until about 2030 to develop the next-generation that is significantly more fuel efficient. This will require a number of technological advancements, including better fan blade design.
However, the main driver for fuel efficiency for P&W is the gear and for CFM the open fan design. Doing both at the same time would be too expensive and too risky for CFM. The open fan design is already pretty risky.
RR is a distant third in the engine market, only playing catch up.
Too repetitive, needs editing.
3D printed parts are not more reliable.
They can be. Think outside the box. You can 3D print a structure that you can not manufacture otherwise.
Horribly boring Robo voice. I only lasted a couple of minutes.
Sweet engine
The RR tempest engine is far more interesting
Potentially really interesting video. Can’t help noticing how you managed to select a piece of background music that annoys 90% of viewers. Irrelevant. Irritating. Annoying. Pointless!
This could have been so much better without the stupid AI narration!!
The rhythm and expression of the human voice can make these things so much more interesting- instead, the cold clinical voice that keeps coming at you without the natural pauses between ideas etc is so boring and annoying.
I hate to think that too many people are just getting used to this crap.
The future of commercial aviation is AIRBUS, BOEING, GENERAL ELECTRIC and PRATT & WHITNEY.
Rolls Royce engines are too expensive to manufacture and maintain.
RR Trent 1000 engines were a failure on the Boeing 787 and for this reason, Air NZ; Al Nippon, LATAM, Thai Airways, Ethiopian Airlines, British Airways and Air Tanzania have rejected substandard RR engines and chosen to power their future Boeing 787 airliners with GEnx engines. More than likely other airlines will follow this trend.
The Trent engines have poor on-wing time on the A380 and the A350 1000 and for this reason Emirates Airlines rejected the A350-1000, favoring the Boeing 777-8 and 777-9 with GE engines for their future widebody airliners.
Yeah
GE and P&W own the market, for good reasons.
@@charliefoxtrot5001 Yeah
A glorified turboprop
Boring boring boring just get to the point 😂😂😂 switched it off
6:50 yw!
#botvid
You need to have someone check your spelling and grammar.
We apologize and have already made the correction.
Still using zeds tho it’s revolutionise and apologise. No Z’s
SUPRIYA KULKARNI 1984
USA puts men in woman's bathroom
Europe makes the best jet engine in the world.
nice lie
GE and Pratt & Whitney corner most of the engine market. Both are US companies. Rolls-Royce is British and has only a small fraction of the market.
Ignorance is bliss and nonsensical politics plays no role at any of these companies.