I don't understand what's wrong with someone blackening their face to portray a black persona or character. Except I have heard someone say something about making fun of black people, but no one wears it for that purpose, and it's really dumb and shitty that anyone would say that. They put it on to pretend to be a black character, what's the BFD? The Wayans Brothers put on whiteface to play White Chicks, and no one freaked out but it's okay for anyone else to do it, right? And Yes, it IS okay for ANYONE to do it. All this hysteria over stupid crap like that needs to stop.
Jesse acknowledged that slaves had to get married in secret using a secret ritual. I feel like it was a missed opportunity to completely dismantle his argument for slavery.
Lol i would get myself canceled if i went on that show. I already have a bit of a problem having the sense of humor of an edgy 12 year old. This guy would take me over the top though.
Such low level commentary. So because Trudeau is overall bad which nobody can deny that means he does nothing good which can be defended?? Basically if you take a stance defending him no matter the sibject your wrong because hes bad?? Tell me WHY the argument is bad not its bad because the guy he is defending is bad.
10:24 - But the NAACP wasn't founded by black people . . . founded by a white woman 10:31 - That's not true 10:38 - W.E.B. DuBois was not a white woman 12:00 - Guy with headphones is a poor listener
Hey, I really enjoyed your content. After your debate with Destiny, I am going to unsubscribe. What an incredibly bad faith discussion. Jesus, dude. WTF Regards, years long subscriber
Peterson is dead wrong about borders. Borders function as political interventions against the free market imprisoning capital, goods, labour, and production. Abolishing borders - making the movement of capital, goods, labour and production 'frictionless', would double world GDP increasing it by around $ 100,000,000,000,000.00, one hundred trillion dollars according to the work of theoretical economists. In the case of Haiti removing barriers to the movement of labour allows skilled Haitian workers to increase their income by 100X. Freeing the market from the depredations of political intervention whether that intervention is of a democratic, socialist, communist, or libertarian stripe, is the surest way to prosperity for all. Oh and BTW no borders = no states = no wars. What's not to like ?
Please explain how... any law works without borders. How does tax work? How does homosexual marriage work? Literally any law that the world doesn't universally agree upon. Thx in advance
@@chunksloth Sure. Law, like language, belongs to a class of institutions termed 'emergent', meaning they form not by individual human intention but rather by way of unintentional, dispersed, complex, collective processes. Such processes occur much faster than biological evolution but much slower than individual intentional design. Such law is sometimes termed 'natural' law, law without an author. Political authority can be said to have colonized this natural law, transforming law into a strategy of domination, sometimes termed 'positivist' law. Now think of language. There is no centralized, monopoly political authority producing and enforcing language yet language, the most critical of all institutions, continuously and spontaneously evolves, adapts, forming new words, new phrases, new idioms so on and so on. It is the same with natural law the difference being that natural law functions to prevent and when necessary peacefully resolves disputes. Interestingly you mention homosexual marriage. Now it is precisely under political / positivist law that homosexual relations were criminalized, that the state incarcerated homosexuals for the positivist 'crime' of misgendering themselves. Now of course political law is always contested, always up for grabs, the subjugated always maneuvering to arrogate political power to themselves in order to rework the positivist law deployed against them. And thus today positivist law still criminalizes misgendering but reworked to now flip the scripts.
@@jeremylewis9819 That's all well and good however it would be helpful if you would reply by way of a more reasoned - and more detailed - counter argument👨🎓
This almost comes off as a parody. If you didn't know the guy, you would think that this is some sort of comedy skit.
off
@@ZER0-- Do you feel better now? Will you sleep tonight ffs?
This is fucking awesome.
Ben is still upset that JLP made him look like a fool a few years ago.
15:09 “it’s kinda stupid to analyze what he’s saying.” Is essentially the headline.
People can’t believe how the truth hurts so all they can do is laugh. It’s clear from there facial expressions
07:20 - Canadian ?
07:25 - Black faces walking around Canada ?
08:20 - Personally
08:29 - What if a black POTUS wore white face ?
I don’t think that it’s a bit. Pretty sure JLP was kicked in the head by a horse.
It’s only a bit in the sense that jlp is totally cynical.
He plays the dumb black guy that spews white supremacy & his white audience loves it
at least link the original content...wtf
09:29 - The NAACP is no good . . .
09:38 - I'm going to have to reject that
09:42 - Why ? I'm black
09:45 - NAACP was founded by W.E.B. DuBois
WEB was a communist…..Booker T was right.
This panel is super beta
Shut up JLP booty boy band 😅
Baydah males!!! 😂
I don't understand what's wrong with someone blackening their face to portray a black persona or character. Except I have heard someone say something about making fun of black people, but no one wears it for that purpose, and it's really dumb and shitty that anyone would say that. They put it on to pretend to be a black character, what's the BFD?
The Wayans Brothers put on whiteface to play White Chicks, and no one freaked out but it's okay for anyone else to do it, right?
And Yes, it IS okay for ANYONE to do it. All this hysteria over stupid crap like that needs to stop.
Peterson is a certified clown.
Yes. He is.
Bayduh! How anyone takes JLP seriously is astounding. Funny guy though.
Amazin
What does he say that’s not true?
@Return2Father Pretty much everything? lol. In this video - Canada and US have similar levels of gun violence, WEB DuBois is evil, communism is evil..
As hard as you guys are laughing now, is how hard I laughed when Jesse had Ben as a guest. ruclips.net/video/FRDQsG43-TY/видео.html
JLP is disrespectful Af
I’m thinking he had no clue who Jesse Lee Peterson was
Neither did Ben when he went on JLP's show
They had no clue that JLP had no clue
Jeet is the man!
Fk me, it's Uncle Ruckus
100%
REM sucks, dude.
@@ArnulfoChalmers Someone's lost, dude.
@@mattgilbert7347 OK but REM still blows... Michael Stipe is pretentious and lame
@@ArnulfoChalmers This is "Give Them an Argument" with Ben Burgis RUclips channel. I don't know why you are talking about REM and Michael Stipe.
Can l get the link to the full video please
It’s Freakin’ Jesse Lee Peterson. Bonkers is the only kind of interview he’s capable of. Remember “where does logic come from?”
Jesse gets his logic from satan
Sure sounds like it.
Jesse acknowledged that slaves had to get married in secret using a secret ritual. I feel like it was a missed opportunity to completely dismantle his argument for slavery.
JLP trolled y'all & you didnt even know it...Amazin'!
Man Jeet should have just come out as a Christian too
Is their a link to the original jlp video?
I thought this guy went away when he was outed as one of them gays
Jesse should just come out the closet
Jesse is a deplorable individual
How so
@@1Eashawty he thinks women who have orgasms want to be men, he butcher's scripture, he believes blacks are here to destroy, etc
@1Eashawty he hates everything except white so called straight Christian men
@@1Eashawty he hates everything and everyone except white so called straight Christian men
Jesse bashes many people, butcher's scripture and purposely tries to trigger people @@1Eashawty
Lol i would get myself canceled if i went on that show. I already have a bit of a problem having the sense of humor of an edgy 12 year old. This guy would take me over the top though.
Ive never been able to tell if this is just a a character he plays.
No. He’s truly this amazin.
AMAZIN
Such low level commentary. So because Trudeau is overall bad which nobody can deny that means he does nothing good which can be defended?? Basically if you take a stance defending him no matter the sibject your wrong because hes bad?? Tell me WHY the argument is bad not its bad because the guy he is defending is bad.
BETA!
10:24 - But the NAACP wasn't founded by black people . . . founded by a white woman
10:31 - That's not true
10:38 - W.E.B. DuBois was not a white woman
12:00 - Guy with headphones is a poor listener
Hey, I really enjoyed your content. After your debate with Destiny, I am going to unsubscribe. What an incredibly bad faith discussion. Jesus, dude. WTF
Regards, years long subscriber
Peterson is dead wrong about borders. Borders function as political interventions against the free market imprisoning capital, goods, labour, and production. Abolishing borders - making the movement of capital, goods, labour and production 'frictionless', would double world GDP increasing it by around $ 100,000,000,000,000.00, one hundred trillion dollars according to the work of theoretical economists. In the case of Haiti removing barriers to the movement of labour allows skilled Haitian workers to increase their income by 100X. Freeing the market from the depredations of political intervention whether that intervention is of a democratic, socialist, communist, or libertarian stripe, is the surest way to prosperity for all.
Oh and BTW no borders = no states = no wars. What's not to like ?
Please explain how... any law works without borders.
How does tax work?
How does homosexual marriage work?
Literally any law that the world doesn't universally agree upon.
Thx in advance
@@chunksloth Sure. Law, like language, belongs to a class of institutions termed 'emergent', meaning they form not by individual human intention but rather by way of unintentional, dispersed, complex, collective processes. Such processes occur much faster than biological evolution but much slower than individual intentional design. Such law is sometimes termed 'natural' law, law without an author. Political authority can be said to have colonized this natural law, transforming law into a strategy of domination, sometimes termed 'positivist' law. Now think of language. There is no centralized, monopoly political authority producing and enforcing language yet language, the most critical of all institutions, continuously and spontaneously evolves, adapts, forming new words, new phrases, new idioms so on and so on. It is the same with natural law the difference being that natural law functions to prevent and when necessary peacefully resolves disputes. Interestingly you mention homosexual marriage. Now it is precisely under political / positivist law that homosexual relations were criminalized, that the state incarcerated homosexuals for the positivist 'crime' of misgendering themselves. Now of course political law is always contested, always up for grabs, the subjugated always maneuvering to arrogate political power to themselves in order to rework the positivist law deployed against them. And thus today positivist law still criminalizes misgendering but reworked to now flip the scripts.
Thats the most moronic thing I've ever heard😂
@@jeremylewis9819 That's all well and good however it would be helpful if you would reply by way of a more reasoned - and more detailed - counter argument👨🎓
@robertcarpenter8077 To believe no boarders no states would prevent war among mankind is absolutely moronic.
Jesse is the man!
Jesse is telling the Truth
Only some of the time. On other issues he is painfully ignorant. He doesn't act like a Christian
‘Mazing
Some Bull-Jeet
that was hilarious
Jesse is super ignorant.
Its a right of passage for all leftists to be privileged with an interview from jlp
you guys will get way more views on this if you cut your commentary and just let the video play i had to stop watching after 3 minutes
AMAZIN'!