True. Generally I don't get into "here's some tips" unless the other player asks about it. It can seem that you're rubbing it in if you say "hey, I just beat your ass, here's how you can play better". So I usually just say gg unless they start a conversation.
Edmund Burke, interesting. But the question is, what constitutes evil and what constitutes good? Should a good man kill an evil man? Is it good to murder a murderer? Logic dictates that if many can be saved by the death of a few then it should be done. But why do the needs of the many outway the needs of the few or the one? What right does any man have over another man? Its different if a man gave his life in sacrifice to others, because the choice and the life is "his" to give.
The point of the argument is to illustrate how deceived society might be on the subject of goodness. What if the good we know(i.e. law and reason) is in fact a form of evil? True goodness can be summed up in one word, Love. And true love is not quid pro quo(something for something, conditional). Because law and reason is conditional, it is not truly good. L and R may be less evil than Hitler and the Nazis, but is not lesser evil still evil?
agree with you 110%, yet, you kinda sounded to me like a great hippie philosopher preaching the word of good will towards men(and noobs) throughought this XD but yeah... getting pissed at a noob is like getting angry at a baby for crying and it really is unsportsmanly to hurtfuly insult and gloat at a nooby if you beat him. good for you for beeing the better man ;D
True. Generally I don't get into "here's some tips" unless the other player asks about it. It can seem that you're rubbing it in if you say "hey, I just beat your ass, here's how you can play better". So I usually just say gg unless they start a conversation.
Yo I just started and first game dude rocked me to death
Edmund Burke, interesting. But the question is, what constitutes evil and what constitutes good? Should a good man kill an evil man? Is it good to murder a murderer? Logic dictates that if many can be saved by the death of a few then it should be done. But why do the needs of the many outway the needs of the few or the one? What right does any man have over another man? Its different if a man gave his life in sacrifice to others, because the choice and the life is "his" to give.
The point of the argument is to illustrate how deceived society might be on the subject of goodness. What if the good we know(i.e. law and reason) is in fact a form of evil? True goodness can be summed up in one word, Love. And true love is not quid pro quo(something for something, conditional). Because law and reason is conditional, it is not truly good. L and R may be less evil than Hitler and the Nazis, but is not lesser evil still evil?
agree with you 110%, yet, you kinda sounded to me like a great hippie philosopher preaching the word of good will towards men(and noobs) throughought this XD but yeah... getting pissed at a noob is like getting angry at a baby for crying and it really is unsportsmanly to hurtfuly insult and gloat at a nooby if you beat him. good for you for beeing the better man ;D
The point I was trying to make is that if you have the option to rage at a noob, try to find a reason to hold it back
How can u zoom out that much
Google "ntw unrestricted camera".
holding back a rage isnt being nice lol, helping him with tips and saying default-armys suck and better no art on grassy that would be nice
@bh5496
"a great hippie philosopher preaching the word of good will towards noobs"
That's awesome.
why not be nice to everyone?