General : Finally. I can go full military in this scenario! Tank Commander : Insurgents too strong? And no remote areas? I have a solution for that. TANKS! MORE TANKS!!
Played this game on my phone, damn it's so addictive haha and it's not repetitive with the scenario. Sometimes you win, sometimes you messed up the plan
This kinds of reminds me of the 1996-2001 Afghan Civil War instead of WW1, with the Taliban controlling most of Afghanistan while the Northern Alliance is bottled up in the northwestern part of the country and on its last legs.
Problem with these type of custom scenarios is, that the game is not really prepared, and the extreme reputation makes it easy. The ONLY way to lose a game like this is, if you lose your HQ, and the game does not throw enough insurgent to get through your soldiers in a defensive position. And even if it were the game itself is not really a war game. You have very little options on commanding your troops. Making the game either very easy, or impossible. The solution would be reducing the starting reputation to a level, that you actually have to work hard, and move fast enough. So that there is an actual urgency, and some tactical decision.
And about 20 years later, someone at the other side of the globe, says "Nah, I don't wanna play anymore" as he returns the country to the red dots, plus some of the green dots' supplies. A week later, 20 years worth of money & assets go down the drain.
Corruption was not an issue AT ALL until the proletariat started to revolt. That only became mainstream after the success of the Russian revolution, at the end of WW1. To think any country, even democratic or with a republic, would think of stopping giving power to the rich, is a rather laughable idea.
You know rebel inc and this escalation is reason why i know little about corruption and handling some political issue but you know what is problem of this game is that. 1.RNG luck victory 2.Each reply in brutal or mega brutal insurgent they become furious and they suddenly surprise attack your capital 3.Last is capicity of using advisor like you know from Green advisor i could just use advisir that extend longer deploy of coliation and increase strength of National soldier.
Now that's what I call a full scale war
Its not civil war, its just *WAR*
General : Finally. I can go full military in this scenario!
Tank Commander : Insurgents too strong? And no remote areas? I have a solution for that. TANKS! MORE TANKS!!
Warlord: Now i can procure funds for me… I mean for the stability of the re… the good of the world.
I read this in General Kwai's voice from Generals Zero Hour
@@zeitghastactive Generals, Zero Hour and fanmade mods are certified Ws.
@@zeitghastactive Ah. Can you feel the thundering song of approaching armour General?
Nice base there. Care to surrender it? AHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHA
@@parkertitle1923lol
Who of you guys turned my "Rebel Inc." into "Hearts of Iron IV"!?
rebel inc is the poor man's hoi4
😂😂😂@@cnm7558
4:40 Wait a second, the year is 1917... The Great War is still raging on at this time!
Yes
And where the soldier get m14 and modern weapons?
@@lev8071 exatamente cabo
@@lev8071 time travelling merchants
@@perlasandoval7883 the library wasn’t burnt
Played this game on my phone, damn it's so addictive haha and it's not repetitive with the scenario. Sometimes you win, sometimes you messed up the plan
This kinds of reminds me of the 1996-2001 Afghan Civil War instead of WW1, with the Taliban controlling most of Afghanistan while the Northern Alliance is bottled up in the northwestern part of the country and on its last legs.
Problem with these type of custom scenarios is, that the game is not really prepared, and the extreme reputation makes it easy. The ONLY way to lose a game like this is, if you lose your HQ, and the game does not throw enough insurgent to get through your soldiers in a defensive position. And even if it were the game itself is not really a war game. You have very little options on commanding your troops. Making the game either very easy, or impossible.
The solution would be reducing the starting reputation to a level, that you actually have to work hard, and move fast enough. So that there is an actual urgency, and some tactical decision.
Literally rebel inc if it was a Full scale war game
Hopefully Pravus finds this scenario eventually.
Great video!
Glad you enjoyed it!
that was so funny when you did an airstrike on yourself :D 14:20
Yeah I let go too early.
Nahhh there is some insurgent hideout there
What's the big deal?
It's just that the US is attacking the civilian population of Afghanistan
@@Randomandbeyknd " calma meu povo! Os mísseis que eu joguei E vocês foram necessários👉👁👁👉 tá ok!? "
Estranhamente soa Como o governo brasileiro
Holy shit your underrated
I mean, I’m alright.
12:12 why would you send the soldier home? You basically have infinite reputation?and that also boosted the insurgents morale?
It was either a mistake or I wanted more of a challenge.
@@killswitchmitch5634 oh alright
And about 20 years later, someone at the other side of the globe, says "Nah, I don't wanna play anymore" as he returns the country to the red dots, plus some of the green dots' supplies. A week later, 20 years worth of money & assets go down the drain.
Wow this is a great map however I tried looking for it but couldn't find it.
never mind found it
Proud of you 👏
Bruh why did he send the coalition soilder home
Yeah lol idk why I did especially with infinite reputation. Coalition soldiers antagonize locals and maybe I did it to make it more of a challenge.
0:32 So this takes place in World War 1? What?
Rather looks like a war against Lybia but yea, its a bit weird to have modern options like jets or anticorruption in 1914
@@sinnombre__ corruption don't exist back in ww1?
Corruption was not an issue AT ALL until the proletariat started to revolt. That only became mainstream after the success of the Russian revolution, at the end of WW1. To think any country, even democratic or with a republic, would think of stopping giving power to the rich, is a rather laughable idea.
@@G.A.C_Preserve It was a simpler time back then..
@@G.A.C_Preserve it did exist but it wqs rarer compared to mldern day
No, at this point you are the rebel 😂😂
Pretty interesting how the scenario takes place in 1914, when the Great War began.
看起来玩的不错
90% всех конфликтов в котором участвовала США выглядят вот так.
Yes, Afghanistan was a perfect example.
There's something wrong with the game when the insurgency has 35 countries supporting them
о помню эту игру. играл года 2 назад
Get back into it!
хорошая идея. надобудет скачать и вспомнить
holy-
Me struggling with 4 bases lmao
To be honest you have a lot more situational awareness than Pravus.
Lol thank you, I also don’t commentate my actions and I’m either around half or a third his age.
rebel inc(x)
war inc(√)
actually, it looks like you play for rebels...
Imagine america play rebel inc in afghanistan and lose the game😂😂😂
When your online friend says he lives in Iraq:
Как называется игра?
First two words of the title.
@@killswitchmitch5634 thx👍
Of course.
You know rebel inc and this escalation is reason why i know little about corruption and handling some political issue but you know what is problem of this game is that.
1.RNG luck victory
2.Each reply in brutal or mega brutal insurgent they become furious and they suddenly surprise attack your capital
3.Last is capicity of using advisor like you know from Green advisor i could just use advisir that extend longer deploy of coliation and increase strength of National soldier.
This looks like you are just playing rebels
🆙
Bad game 👎
The scenario, or the entire game is not your liking?
Критикуешь, предлогай, ждём на твоём канале лучшей игры чем на данном видео
Bro you are bad