Hi, thank you for watching & asking. Due to the number of questions & enquiries I get now, I only respond to subscribers. It is only fair for my time and costs you nothing to subscribe. Sorry, hope you understand. Regards, Bill.
@Bill M - RC Hello Bill and Thank you very much for this great video. I found it very useful. I am a beginner of FPV and drones and I was wondering if in your opinion is better to buy a 40-50 euros FPV Goggles pair (I found the EMAX On gearbest for 45 euros) or buy the ROTG02 with a normal VR. As I could understand FPV Goggles may reach a greater range but ROTG02 with a normal VR could have a better resolution, but I am not sure. Your opinion would be very appreciated ... :) Thank you, Silvio
Wow this is the first one video where is possible see the real range without bullshit! Thanks! So about 300 meters with stock anternna. I just bought same receiver with mushroom antenna but i haven't tested yed. By the way great video.
Hi, thanks for watching & commenting, much appreciated :-) I am pleased you find this helpful and it will be interesting to see how this performs with a mushroom antenna too :-)
Bill M - RC. I have an update, i've tried fpv with mushroom antenna , tried walking on the road not on drone. Well with stock about 200meters , with mushroom about 10 meters more, so no big difference.
Dear Bill M, thanks for the video. one comment regarding your verbal conclusion that the reception of the ROTG02 is worse. During the side by side footage @14:48 it seems that you flew further with the ROTG02 compared to the side by side video of the ROTG01 @15:27; Thus the break up of the ROTG02 cannot be honestly compared with the ROTG01 as you flew a shorter distance with the ROTG01. Thanks for the video anyway, it was interesting to see the reception difference between the two devices.
Hi Niels, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) Perhaps a bit shorter but the focus was on reliability within the distance rather than a few meters more.
Apparently there little difference between the 1 and the 2. Probably because the 2 doesn't use different antennas like a patch and an omni to be true diversity. Still impressive range considering your antennas are positioned all wrong.
Yeah, exactly what I predicted, as like you said, what does the diversity even have to do when in open spaces, a straight line, no turns, etc. The diversity is being testicled in no way whatsoever.
There is a target video where the ROTG01 was used ground-to-ground and it showed good reception at just over 4000 yards. He had to stop because "he was next to his neighbor's property line". The 01 is now slouch.
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, much appreciated :-) Yes, I am using a car controller but only to hold the phone in its mount and the radio controller is for the Bugs 2 quadcopter used.
heh. ok now it makes sense. CJ youngblood flys his stingray with a custom build car controller that looks pretty cool. I was wondering if you had done something similar.
Nice test. I have a question. I understand that android app records and 30fps. Thats ok. But what fps we get in our vr box googles? 30 fps or more? I mean, just for watching, not recording.
Hi Lucas, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) Sorry, but I do not understand what this could possibly achieve that the ROTG02 does not do already.
The thing is that i have rotg01, the antenna it comes with another exactly the same. But, as this kind of antennas send the Frequency only to the sides of it, so when i go up in the sky with my plane, i lose signal, and if i change the orientation of the antenna, i Will lose signal when i fly on my sides. The question si: can i put two antennas in the same port, as if it was rotg02?
@@lucascaviezel8899 Ok, I understand better now, I would suggest that you try and use a pagoda antenna with this then, as I doubt you can add an additional antenna to the single receiver on the ROTG01.
Ok... forgive me for pointing out the obvious, BUT, if I'm not mistaken something was wonky with the Transmitter on the quadcopter NOT the receiver....I say this because the video on the DVR went out at the same time as the video on the 02 receiver, which IF the DVR has a totally independent receiver from that of the 02, would mean that the TRANSMITTER not the receiver was the fault of the weak signal in the 02 test....if it was the 02 receivers fault, then the DVR should have kept a picture when after the 02 failed. I believe SOMETHING in your test rig failed and skewed the results!
Hi, thank you for watching, commenting & subbing, always much appreciated :-) Yes, there are a couple of simultaneous signal losses for whatever reason which also happend in the ROTG 01 test.
@@BillMRC yes but when the 02 test dropped out completely, it also dropped out on the DVR rig, which has a completely different receiver, so if both of them are losing the signal at the same time then the problem is a weak transmitter or interference, and not the fault of the receiver module! I'm not talking about the temporary dropouts, I'm talking about at the point where you say you lost video and deduced that the 01 did better then the 02.
Hi Gabriel, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) Better antennas will not make a big difference but a stronger vtx output will.
Hi Ferdy, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) ,the ROTG01 is best within 300 meters and the ROTG02 best beyond 300 meters.
Hi Sol, thank you for watching & commenting :-) Yes, the ROTG01 performed well overall and I would say that the ROTG02 is better within 300 metres. I have not tried these with different antennas but as you can see on the DVR, the Aomway & Patch antennas did not particularly make much of a difference.
Hi, thanks for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) This works with 5.8ghz output signals, this should help you understand this: ruclips.net/video/15v2I93sMQs/видео.html
@@BillMRC On the face of it, two is always better than one, right, Nope. It's still only got one receiver. I can see where two antennas"might" interferre and might cause other problems and add in the extra cost, the single antenna is just better IMO. :o)
Hi Kurniawan, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-),the ROTG01 is best within 300 meters and the ROTG02 best beyond 300 meters.
Благодаря этому куску китайского овна потерял квадрик. Запись сглючила, фал битый, восстановить ничем не смог. Сервис у них похоже не работает. Жрет электричество немеряно. 4000 mah смартфона хватит всего на часа полтора. Завести внешнее питание не смог.
Hi, thank you for watching & asking. Due to the number of questions & enquiries I get now, I only respond to subscribers. It is only fair for my time and costs you nothing to subscribe. Sorry, hope you understand. Regards, Bill.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Hi, thank you for watching & asking. Due to the number of questions & enquiries I get now, I only respond to subscribers. It is only fair for my time and costs you nothing to subscribe. Sorry, hope you understand. Regards, Bill.
@Bill M - RC Hello Bill and Thank you very much for this great video. I found it very useful. I am a beginner of FPV and drones and I was wondering if in your opinion is better to buy a 40-50 euros FPV Goggles pair (I found the EMAX On gearbest for 45 euros) or buy the ROTG02 with a normal VR. As I could understand FPV Goggles may reach a greater range but ROTG02 with a normal VR could have a better resolution, but I am not sure. Your opinion would be very appreciated ... :) Thank you, Silvio
Wow this is the first one video where is possible see the real range without bullshit! Thanks! So about 300 meters with stock anternna. I just bought same receiver with mushroom antenna but i haven't tested yed. By the way great video.
Hi, thanks for watching & commenting, much appreciated :-) I am pleased you find this helpful and it will be interesting to see how this performs with a mushroom antenna too :-)
Bill M - RC. I have an update, i've tried fpv with mushroom antenna , tried walking on the road not on drone. Well with stock about 200meters , with mushroom about 10 meters more, so no big difference.
Hi, thanks for this update, this is good to know :-)
@@kebotto Do you refer to ROTG01 or ROTG02?
i think the rotg02 works better with obstables in their way. Thats where this one shines.
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) Good point, thank you for sharing :-)
Thanks for running these tests! Very interesting that the cheaper model had better reception. And I love your New Zealand accent.
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
thank you sir! this video cleared my thoughts about this two receivers!
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
Brilliant honest review👍
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
Best review ever . Without any nonsense. Thank you bro.
Hi Mufid, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
@@BillMRC Bro plzz test eachine rotgo 1 and rotgo 2 with eachine tx01 .
@@boogydream6552 I unfortunately do not have an eachine tx01
It would be great to see this same test with a txo3 at 200 mw!!
Hi Jonathan, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) I unfortunately do not have a tx03 to test this.
Really fantastic Video and great test flight.....thumbs up Bill 👍👍
Hi Thorsten, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated my friend :-)
Thanks for review!
Dear Bill M, thanks for the video. one comment regarding your verbal conclusion that the reception of the ROTG02 is worse. During the side by side footage @14:48 it seems that you flew further with the ROTG02 compared to the side by side video of the ROTG01 @15:27; Thus the break up of the ROTG02 cannot be honestly compared with the ROTG01 as you flew a shorter distance with the ROTG01.
Thanks for the video anyway, it was interesting to see the reception difference between the two devices.
Hi Niels, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) Perhaps a bit shorter but the focus was on reliability within the distance rather than a few meters more.
To get better signal with the Eachine ROTG02 receiver, the antennas should be upright just like on the Eachine ROTG01.
Hopefully that helps. :)
Hi Attila, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) I actually find it better like this, thank you.
Magyarok! :)
Wow. Just goes to show you, newer is not always better. Glad I have the ROTG01. Thanks!
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
Hi, is it possible to start scanning video transmissions via software instead of pressing the button on the device ?
Apparently there little difference between the 1 and the 2. Probably because the 2 doesn't use different antennas like a patch and an omni to be true diversity. Still impressive range considering your antennas are positioned all wrong.
Yeah, exactly what I predicted, as like you said, what does the diversity even have to do when in open spaces, a straight line, no turns, etc. The diversity is being testicled in no way whatsoever.
Very interesting....Helps a lot..Thanks
There is a target video where the ROTG01 was used ground-to-ground and it showed good reception at just over 4000 yards. He had to stop because "he was next to his neighbor's property line". The 01 is now slouch.
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) I trust that this has improved in over two years.
@@BillMRC how about now? do you think rotg improved?
My rotg02 ranging 800-1km using 600mW. I think it can pass 1km because my quad range is only 1km
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) It will, I stopped at 1.2km in this test.
Will this receiver work with TBS video transmitter like TBS Unify VTX?
Great video, you got to the point no bs. Thank you I will buy a ROTGO1
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) I am pleased you found this helpful :-)
Hi, Bill.
Could you tell me what two DVDr models are you using here? I am new, sorry.
Hi mate, Can you pair the MJX Bugs 2 transmitter with any other recievers? Thanks
Nice test Bill!
Hi Angelo, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
Thanks for the information
Hi, thanks for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
nice comparison. whats up with the car controller?
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, much appreciated :-) Yes, I am using a car controller but only to hold the phone in its mount and the radio controller is for the Bugs 2 quadcopter used.
heh. ok now it makes sense. CJ youngblood flys his stingray with a custom build car controller that looks pretty cool. I was wondering if you had done something similar.
Does it work with 16:9 cams??
Thank you sir for info
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
Nice test. I have a question. I understand that android app records and 30fps. Thats ok. But what fps we get in our vr box googles? 30 fps or more? I mean, just for watching, not recording.
your rotg02 antennas must stay straight to get better range.
Rotg01 upgrade antena, this ia good idea ?
Hi Ferdy, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) The antenna work fine, so no point.
Hi Bill, Youve got way to much interference going on at base and incorrect antennas that are not optimal.
Can i make an adapter to put two antennas un one port?
Hi Lucas, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) Sorry, but I do not understand what this could possibly achieve that the ROTG02 does not do already.
The thing is that i have rotg01, the antenna it comes with another exactly the same. But, as this kind of antennas send the Frequency only to the sides of it, so when i go up in the sky with my plane, i lose signal, and if i change the orientation of the antenna, i Will lose signal when i fly on my sides.
The question si: can i put two antennas in the same port, as if it was rotg02?
@@lucascaviezel8899 Ok, I understand better now, I would suggest that you try and use a pagoda antenna with this then, as I doubt you can add an additional antenna to the single receiver on the ROTG01.
Grate, thank you
Which is the best one
Hi Sethu, thank you for watching, both are good but I would say the ROTG01 is best within 300 meters and the ROTG02 best beyond 300 meters.
Tq bro
Very useful video
Awesome video
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
How about the latency???
Hi, thank you for watching :-) The latency is not bad, but I would not recommend using this for racing or freestyle.
Bill M - RC is there is any 5.8g otg receiver for fpv racing???
can he work on drone apps android?
I can´t download app from google drive link.
Hi, Bil m rc, thank you, nice revieuw and i buy one now :)
Hi Mohammed, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
Ok... forgive me for pointing out the obvious, BUT, if I'm not mistaken something was wonky with the Transmitter on the quadcopter NOT the receiver....I say this because the video on the DVR went out at the same time as the video on the 02 receiver, which IF the DVR has a totally independent receiver from that of the 02, would mean that the TRANSMITTER not the receiver was the fault of the weak signal in the 02 test....if it was the 02 receivers fault, then the DVR should have kept a picture when after the 02 failed. I believe SOMETHING in your test rig failed and skewed the results!
Hi, thank you for watching, commenting & subbing, always much appreciated :-) Yes, there are a couple of simultaneous signal losses for whatever reason which also happend in the ROTG 01 test.
@@BillMRC yes but when the 02 test dropped out completely, it also dropped out on the DVR rig, which has a completely different receiver, so if both of them are losing the signal at the same time then the problem is a weak transmitter or interference, and not the fault of the receiver module! I'm not talking about the temporary dropouts, I'm talking about at the point where you say you lost video and deduced that the 01 did better then the 02.
can i uae it in 5g wifi fpv camera.?,
Hi Dennis, thank you for watching and asking. No, this is not wifi compatible, only for 5.8ghz frequency.
@@BillMRC ..thankz a lot sir for the info.,👍..,
Thanks for information, like
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
If I put a better antenna will the range and image get better?
Hi Gabriel, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) Better antennas will not make a big difference but a stronger vtx output will.
@@BillMRC ok, thx
Who is better bro ? Rotg01 ?
Hi Ferdy, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) ,the ROTG01 is best within 300 meters and the ROTG02 best beyond 300 meters.
@@BillMRC thanks for the information :)
Great Video. In this test, the ROTG01 won. Did you try and use better antennas to see if the result will change? Thanks
Hi Sol, thank you for watching & commenting :-) Yes, the ROTG01 performed well overall and I would say that the ROTG02 is better within 300 metres. I have not tried these with different antennas but as you can see on the DVR, the Aomway & Patch antennas did not particularly make much of a difference.
nice video.. what is best rotg01 or rotg02?
Hi Yoshi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-),the ROTG01 is best within 300 meters and the ROTG02 best beyond 300 meters.
@@BillMRC ok.. thank you
i wonder if its gonna work on bugs 5w camera?
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) I do not think this will work as this is 2.4ghz & Bugs 5W is 5g wifi .
@@BillMRC do you have any idea on how to extend my fpv signal on bugs 5w cam?
Did the DVR have a Patch and an Aomway?
Hi, thanks for watching :-) Yes, the DVR had a patch and Aomway antennas.
Was the transmitter 600mw???
Hi Lucas, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) The transmitter used was 25mw, as mentioned in the description above.
Thanks
Which one is the good product
Hi Mazman, thank you for watching, both are good but I would say the ROTG01 is best within 300 meters and the ROTG02 best beyond 300 meters.
@@BillMRC thanks for the information
am i bad at hearing or is did someone call you on discord at 4:14
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) Not sure what it was but I did not have discord installed.
can be used to reception WiFi flycam 5g is not?
Rotgo2 does it need a WiFi or phone signal to work?
Hi, thanks for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-) This works with 5.8ghz output signals, this should help you understand this: ruclips.net/video/15v2I93sMQs/видео.html
Which airfield is this?
Hi Dan, thanks for watching :-) It is the disused Wisley Airfield near Ripley.
Very nice video like friend
Hi Leo, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated, my friend :-)
ROTG01 is the clear winner.
Hi Mitch, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
@@BillMRC On the face of it, two is always better than one, right, Nope. It's still only got one receiver. I can see where two antennas"might" interferre and might cause other problems and add in the extra cost, the single antenna is just better IMO. :o)
Nice
Hi, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-)
Who the best?
Hi Kurniawan, thank you for watching & commenting, always much appreciated :-),the ROTG01 is best within 300 meters and the ROTG02 best beyond 300 meters.
+1👍 thanks found video on banggood
la prueba tiene que ser con las mismas antenas,asi no vale....fail video
Благодаря этому куску китайского овна потерял квадрик. Запись сглючила, фал битый, восстановить ничем не смог. Сервис у них похоже не работает. Жрет электричество немеряно. 4000 mah смартфона хватит всего на часа полтора. Завести внешнее питание не смог.
Hi, thank you for watching & asking. Due to the number of questions & enquiries I get now, I only respond to subscribers. It is only fair for my time and costs you nothing to subscribe. Sorry, hope you understand. Regards, Bill.