Kinetic molecular theory of gases | Physical Processes | MCAT | Khan Academy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
  • Created by David SantoPietro.
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacadem...
    Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacadem...
    MCAT on Khan Academy: Go ahead and practice some passage-based questions!
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to Khan Academy’s MCAT channel: / @khanacademymcatprep
    Subscribe to Khan Academy: www.youtube.co...

Комментарии • 176

  • @alanbautista9247
    @alanbautista9247 10 лет назад +150

    You did a better gob at explaining this in 15 minutes than my professor in 3 weeks. Thank you!

    • @Vultimo
      @Vultimo 10 лет назад +3

      same here!

    • @evastatrmercer4357
      @evastatrmercer4357 5 лет назад

      Same for me !

    • @evamartini2478
      @evamartini2478 5 лет назад +1

      My teacher tried it in 15 minutes as well and that did not work out

    • @juzzgail6
      @juzzgail6 4 года назад +2

      3weeks?????? My professor kust gabe us random worksheets lmao. no discussions

    • @teenagegamers8015
      @teenagegamers8015 3 года назад +1

      My private teacher in 13.5 mins

  • @JoshuaSalazarMejia
    @JoshuaSalazarMejia 9 лет назад +25

    The best explaination that I've found over the web, thanks!
    You're an excellent teacher David!

  • @manareldredy9820
    @manareldredy9820 6 лет назад +3

    it's the perfect way to explain it
    i've been skippin phy lectures and watchin vids instead
    cuz when i watch these vids i understand the subject well and the best of all i don't fall asleep

  • @trappraizzy
    @trappraizzy 4 года назад +5

    its been 7 freaking years and this is still helpful, thanks man.

  • @dad7547
    @dad7547 4 года назад +6

    This is quite literally one the best Physics videos out there. Gave me goosebumps learning about this :)

  • @anonymous-8259
    @anonymous-8259 8 лет назад +30

    so here i am watching this khan's video instead of listening to my lecturer.
    Tbh its easier to learn here than to learn from my professor and it took me less than 15 minutes to figure out things than listening to my professor for 2 hours session.
    SO WHY AM I PAYING MY COLLEGE TUITION FEES FOR :((((((

  • @jacobvandijk6525
    @jacobvandijk6525 4 года назад +3

    @ 8:23 The only thing we get is a formula telling us how to calculate the pressure P when N particles hit ONE SIDE OF THE BOX at the same time. What about the pressure on the other walls??? @ 11:07 Only 1/3N particles are hitting that ONE WALL !!!

  • @halo4eva100
    @halo4eva100 7 лет назад +1

    Just went to a lecture and didnt understand most of this stuff, watched two Khan academy videos and everything is so clear to me now. Thanks you!!!

  • @theiigotriangularround4880
    @theiigotriangularround4880 Год назад +1

    For those who don't get why we took time interval instead of Collison time ans what it tells us . Well it gives us magnitude of force as if a force acted on particle as it went from one wall to another wall and back.

  • @hampirestoration
    @hampirestoration 9 месяцев назад +1

    Calculation of the pressure of an ideal gas...! It's in HC verma.. but this video makes it even more easy to follow! 😊

  • @rifathasan2741
    @rifathasan2741 3 года назад +1

    Oh god... I wasted more than 7 days on this topic none couldn't explain it . At last i got it. Thank you 😍

  • @emanalwan6461
    @emanalwan6461 2 года назад +3

    Something didn't make sense to me. when we talk about change in momentum isn't delta t the time spent in the collision itself why would we use the time between two different collisions?

  • @Marisa-mv4cw
    @Marisa-mv4cw 4 года назад

    i've been relying on RUclips explanations for my finals lol Khan Academy did a stellar job at explaining every single subject. propsssss.

  • @RahulYadav-ix8ky
    @RahulYadav-ix8ky 9 лет назад +17

    delta t should be the time taken for the change in velocity bw the collision on the surface of wall
    my doubt

  • @CarlosJimenez-fj4ku
    @CarlosJimenez-fj4ku 6 лет назад +9

    "It's so important I'm gonna write it again"
    -David SantoPietro, 2014

  • @rickshawty
    @rickshawty 5 месяцев назад

    thank you for the best explanation i found so far

  • @jugalshah9261
    @jugalshah9261 4 года назад +2

    Thankyou sir, you helped me understand that why aren't we taking the delta t as the time of impact,, God Bless you

  • @sickboydroid
    @sickboydroid 2 года назад +2

    OMG! That was a great explaination (especially for the last part)
    You are a life saver dude...
    Love from India ❤️

  • @xigong3009
    @xigong3009 2 года назад +1

    The mentioning of the link between macroscopic and microscopic quantities is great!

  • @geetathakur445
    @geetathakur445 4 года назад +1

    Thank you thank you thank you!👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @sunildeshpande6600
    @sunildeshpande6600 3 года назад +2

    is temperature related to the only translatory motion of the gas molecules or also to rotatory and vibratory motion? if so why do we only consider the change in the linear momentum in the discussion?

    • @sickboydroid
      @sickboydroid 2 года назад

      Yeah actually for real gases you have to consider that as well. But for ideal we neglect all intermolecular force and gravitational force so particles always move in a straight line path (called free path).
      They change directions only when they collide with other particles but after colliding they again travel in straight line path. So you don't need to calculate any other momentum other than linear momentum for ideal gases

  • @cosettegarzon5322
    @cosettegarzon5322 7 лет назад +36

    I was so distracted by the cube doing the weird optical illusion thing

  • @FangsShadow
    @FangsShadow 9 лет назад +8

    Why isn't this up on the website with the ideal gas equation series?

  • @Mrnobody-m4j
    @Mrnobody-m4j 8 лет назад +2

    Very clear for me understand

  • @lytvynenkod
    @lytvynenkod 6 лет назад +5

    This explanaition is wrong !!! You can't use the momentan force applyed on the wall like it will be with F= ∆p /∆ t , but you need the average Force applyed on ONE WALL (always the same).
    So you have to calculate the total momentum over the time (F_average=p_tot / time_tot) and to dothat , you make a sum over all the momentum diveded by the sum of all times.
    => F_average = (-2 p_x (t_contact ) + 0 (t_travel)) / (t_contact + t_travel) = (-2 p_{x} (t_contact ) / (t_contact + t_travel) , the 0 is the momentum aplied on the wall for time that particle is away from the wall (t_travel ).
    since t_travel >>>>>>> t_contact YOU GET F_average_ = (-2 p_{x} (t_contact ) / (t_travel)
    This detail is very important for the logical construction of the solution , otherwise you learn wrong concepts.

  • @percyjacks8170
    @percyjacks8170 10 лет назад +2

    Simply amazing! I understand it a lot better now, the use of colours really helped too :)

  • @正正气常存
    @正正气常存 11 месяцев назад

    this is fantastic, really love it

  • @segasaturn3215
    @segasaturn3215 9 лет назад +2

    Are you assuming that all particles are traveling in a straight line from one end of the container to the other by using 2L as the distance?

  • @aniljyotir9788
    @aniljyotir9788 4 года назад +1

    It was so much fun to learn it

  • @SkylerWhiteYoo
    @SkylerWhiteYoo 3 года назад

    Man, you are amazing! Thank you!

  • @muddyagua
    @muddyagua 6 лет назад

    thx for making understand the 1/3 in this formula which my professor just wanted me to memorize mechanically

  • @Calvin3578
    @Calvin3578 10 лет назад

    I AM GOING TO HAVE A PHYSICS EXAM IN THE COMING WEDNESDAY. THIS VIDEO IS REALLY AMAZING! THANK YOU SO MUCH BRO!

    • @sarahkaveh7739
      @sarahkaveh7739 4 года назад

      It was 5 years ago 😃i just wonder what your career is now or what you are doing

  • @chibuikeagba8591
    @chibuikeagba8591 8 лет назад

    I wish I saw this before today. Thank you very much for making me understand this.

  • @ms32chiacaixin75
    @ms32chiacaixin75 3 года назад

    Thank You !

  • @mariumali4852
    @mariumali4852 5 лет назад +4

    I still don't get the reason given at 4:15

  • @harsh8457
    @harsh8457 5 лет назад

    Superb video
    Thanks for clearing bdoubt

  • @DfitDoc
    @DfitDoc Год назад +1

    I did fifteen pushups for you

  • @johngasno4602
    @johngasno4602 4 года назад +1

    "Great explaination" it's so important I'm gonna write it again

  • @TheKing-th1en
    @TheKing-th1en 4 года назад

    Great explanation.good job 👍🔥🔥🔥

  • @samsunnahar9175
    @samsunnahar9175 4 года назад

    Thank you so much for your excellent explanation!!

  • @zabintanfa7650
    @zabintanfa7650 4 года назад

    It was really very good and helpful.

  • @랄랄라-w3p
    @랄랄라-w3p 5 лет назад

    thank you so much for your kind and sophisticated explanation !

  • @togrulnbili8703
    @togrulnbili8703 7 лет назад

    that is exactly what i was looking for.Thanks for great explanation

  • @thinhl8683
    @thinhl8683 9 лет назад +2

    Is this on Khan Academy Website?

  • @babulroy3093
    @babulroy3093 8 лет назад

    Very clear presentation.

  • @frankgetachew1833
    @frankgetachew1833 2 года назад

    You're my best

  • @saivarun656
    @saivarun656 6 лет назад +4

    It's too simple my teacher was explaining this in a quite complicated way that I just.....dozed off😴😴😴😝😝

  • @vigneshsubash
    @vigneshsubash 6 лет назад

    Thanks for your video! Seriously helped a lot.

  • @ahmedsalem4675
    @ahmedsalem4675 8 лет назад +1

    These very helpful

  • @HorizonSpeed26
    @HorizonSpeed26 5 лет назад

    Very nice and interesting presentation.

  • @jagratsingh3664
    @jagratsingh3664 4 года назад

    It will take longer then 2l as there are intermolecular collisions also increasing time

  • @jexk2985
    @jexk2985 6 лет назад +2

    I don't understand why velocity in this lesson equal to distance over time please anyone answer ? And why did the displacement equal to 2L?

  • @taromellon
    @taromellon 8 лет назад +1

    THANK YOU

  • @MohamedGamal-rv3cm
    @MohamedGamal-rv3cm 6 лет назад +1

    Question, How come we use delta P = 2 mVx , and the V here is for velocity then you used v= x/t where V here stands for speed not velocity and took its valuue to plug it in the delta P = 2 mvx . explanation please?

  • @fadelsmida7151
    @fadelsmida7151 7 месяцев назад

    I like this guy

  • @ewoigbesamuel5558
    @ewoigbesamuel5558 2 года назад

    Nice❤️.

  • @samsonodoyo8144
    @samsonodoyo8144 5 лет назад

    amazing explanation David

  • @jasonlosslow2423
    @jasonlosslow2423 7 лет назад

    good explanation as always
    Thx khan academy

  • @arcollaboration9380
    @arcollaboration9380 6 лет назад

    The explanation made me like and share he video

  • @a7mad3bbas
    @a7mad3bbas 9 лет назад

    wow !! really appreciate it ! .. such an awesome explanation!!

  • @hritikgogoi3577
    @hritikgogoi3577 6 лет назад

    I become your fan. So nice... 😇

  • @starkkyr7976
    @starkkyr7976 7 лет назад

    thank you khanacademy

  • @thaison7332
    @thaison7332 2 года назад

    ty sir

  • @violat6549
    @violat6549 8 лет назад +1

    really helpful

  • @stonebrother3751
    @stonebrother3751 7 лет назад

    Wallahi you are awesome :D

  • @muhammad.husnain6819
    @muhammad.husnain6819 6 лет назад

    u are amazing mate

  • @Mooloolah28
    @Mooloolah28 6 лет назад

    Thanks man, like always.

  • @Jaideep_Joy
    @Jaideep_Joy 9 лет назад

    Wow amazing explanation you made it look really easy....

    • @kevinpham597
      @kevinpham597 9 лет назад

      +jaideep sohal Seriously. What I love is how he says how awesome each equation is and then explains what they're supposed to mean.

    • @zayaanpandi7538
      @zayaanpandi7538 8 лет назад

      why do your pic have the MIDDLE FINGER :(

    • @technodeus1122
      @technodeus1122 8 лет назад

      There are two fingers lol... It doesn't have just middle finger

  • @eccleziassenat3262
    @eccleziassenat3262 5 лет назад

    great explanation i love it.

  • @Seishiro_Nagi_11
    @Seishiro_Nagi_11 8 лет назад +1

    Can some one answer me
    the air density is less in higher altitude that of lower altitude meanings , gas molecules due to effect of gravity have more density and form lower layer of atmosphere in more amount. It is against one of the postulates of KTOG of is the assumption wrong!?

  • @shubhanshu4889
    @shubhanshu4889 10 лет назад

    thanks a lot bro you just saved me from failing

  • @ottoomen5076
    @ottoomen5076 4 года назад

    excellent presentation. Does anyone know of any molecular theory of gases books?

  • @mahaboobbashashaik148
    @mahaboobbashashaik148 5 лет назад

    Can you please also make a video explaining the derivation in the first chapter of Max Born's Atomic Physics for same equation?

  • @iftekherahmmed4138
    @iftekherahmmed4138 2 года назад

    4:11 I clicked this video just to find that note

  • @joza-bi3iz
    @joza-bi3iz 9 лет назад

    Algebra God!!!

  • @nithishreddy1690
    @nithishreddy1690 6 лет назад

    excellent boss

  • @razialghifary9481
    @razialghifary9481 4 года назад +1

    Hi, whoever be the owner of this video, i need your permission. I wanted to translate this video to Bahasa Indonesia. And maybe i'll just send it to my lecturer, cause some of my friend can't understand english language. So, i wanted to make a translate with a "dub" in bahasa. So i need your permission, thank you in advance. Have a wonderful day!☺️✌️

  • @eshakurwa
    @eshakurwa 7 лет назад

    Sincere thanks. You made my day. Concepts cant be cleared any better :-)

  • @jazirusharifu8393
    @jazirusharifu8393 8 лет назад

    good presentation

  • @drakerocky7808
    @drakerocky7808 7 лет назад

    thanks

  • @mazenmohammed3262
    @mazenmohammed3262 6 лет назад

    Thanx

  • @Riiisuu
    @Riiisuu 7 лет назад

    What is the difference between little n and capital N? 13:52

    • @kibavaria
      @kibavaria 7 лет назад

      n denotes moles, whereas capital N denotes total number of molecules.

    • @Riiisuu
      @Riiisuu 7 лет назад

      Khaled Ismail thank you, so n (little n) is always 6.022...10^23 then?

    • @haarithio1621
      @haarithio1621 7 лет назад

      no that is Avogadro's constant which is the number of particles in a mole.

    • @Riiisuu
      @Riiisuu 7 лет назад

      haarithio 2 oh thanks, so to get N (number of particles), you do n (number of moles of a substance)*Na (Avogadro’s number)?

    • @haarithio1621
      @haarithio1621 7 лет назад

      Reece exactly

  • @prathameshnakhawa4975
    @prathameshnakhawa4975 6 лет назад

    I have a doubt if we assume that total p particles are there and then we say n number of particles collide in the right plane in x directionand say some x particles collide in the upper plane in y direction then how is the mean velocity is same ux= uy=uz

  • @mikomurray1661
    @mikomurray1661 10 лет назад

    I loved this video. You explained it so well and made me pretty excited about doing some maths in the process! Nice work :)

  • @saskiakristofedes9836
    @saskiakristofedes9836 9 лет назад

    There r 10 concepts of KMT of gases right? could u explain those individually?

  • @AnkitKumar-xr8yc
    @AnkitKumar-xr8yc 9 лет назад

    why are we adding all N molecule forces at a same time because all the molecules of gases cant hit the face at same time please answer

    • @TheLogmp
      @TheLogmp 9 лет назад

      +Ankit Kumar Great question. It's a fine point, but he adds all the particles at the same time because if you remember when he was replacing delta t, he stated that delta t was the time interval for a particle to collide with the wall, bounce off the parallel wall on the other side, and then come all the way back. That means every particle will eventually collide with the wall during that time interval.
      There are alternative derivations where you leave delta t and apply it to the number of molecules moving rightward at a given time, in which case you do divide by one half (because half are moving rightward the other half are moving leftward), which is what you were probably thinking to do. That method is also completely fine and you arrive at the same answer. I prefer that method because you don't have to arbitrarily multiply by one half to see the kinetic energy term. It's there from the beginning. :)

  • @amansinghal2431
    @amansinghal2431 8 лет назад

    just a curious question what are u using to write because it looks like handwriting but I can see the cursor?

  • @khushalsiddiq7852
    @khushalsiddiq7852 7 лет назад

    How do you work out Vx2 average.

  • @brianbycroft6090
    @brianbycroft6090 9 лет назад +1

    In the macroscopic world, if it was a ball bouncing against a wall, to calculate momentum change, and thus force, the delta(t) would be the time in contact with the wall, not total travel time. For much of the time period 2L/v, there is no momentum change. Why is this larger time period used at the microscopic level??

    • @brianbycroft6090
      @brianbycroft6090 9 лет назад

      +Brian Bycroft Makes perfect sense, after I read the notes on the video! My apologies

    • @elangz9201
      @elangz9201 8 лет назад

      Brian Bycroft can u explain it to me pleasee

    • @danehas4078
      @danehas4078 7 лет назад

      Brian Bycroft which note?

    • @justpauify
      @justpauify 7 лет назад

      Help please

  • @mihaimi9978
    @mihaimi9978 8 лет назад

    Ideal gas with:
    P=10^5Pa
    V=2 l
    What is the average kinetic energy of translational motion of the molecules of this gas?

    • @AnkitaMazumder24
      @AnkitaMazumder24 7 лет назад

      Mihai Mi Either number of molecules of gas or number of moles of gas is required to solve it.

  • @sudhapriyashrivastava6808
    @sudhapriyashrivastava6808 5 лет назад

    Please explain why Velocity in x,y,z directions are equal.

    • @abenphilip4283
      @abenphilip4283 5 лет назад

      Since the gas is isotropic...(having same proper ties in all directions)

  • @kayannahall5723
    @kayannahall5723 8 лет назад

    God bless you :)

  • @SBB628
    @SBB628 8 лет назад

    we have assumed that the walls of the container are elastic for molecular collisions. actually the walls may be inelastic. why does this makes no difference as long as the walls are at the same temperature as the gas?....answer plzzz

    • @tmb0183
      @tmb0183 7 лет назад

      The weight of the gas molecules is very, very less compared to that of the container that their collisions don't create an effect on the container. moreover due to this they get rebounded with the same velocity

    • @AnkitaMazumder24
      @AnkitaMazumder24 7 лет назад

      You may want to study the assumptions made for an ideal gas to derive these equations.

  • @mhmmdhaggag
    @mhmmdhaggag 9 лет назад

    hiiiican you tell me please what ddi you use to make this video what is that tool you use to appear on screen like a black board???

    • @RogueNiNja99138
      @RogueNiNja99138 9 лет назад

      +Mohammed haggag Sal uses SmoothDraw v2.1

    • @vintagescorpio49
      @vintagescorpio49 9 лет назад

      +manuveer singh and movtavi, and microsoft paint, and... yea

  • @Aerosmissive
    @Aerosmissive 8 лет назад

    please someone let me know the difference of Energy of Electron kT between molcule E=3/2kT

  • @edis9493
    @edis9493 4 года назад

    Why is N not divided by 2 as well?

  • @ryanmagbitang7545
    @ryanmagbitang7545 7 лет назад

    does anyone knows what app is he using here?

  • @haninazirah4715
    @haninazirah4715 7 лет назад

    Im so sleepy during physics class so im here to revise back this alien formula

  • @kay-wh8gq
    @kay-wh8gq 7 лет назад

    Man you killed the shit outta the topic.

  • @non-premiumgamers5960
    @non-premiumgamers5960 7 лет назад

    Awesome 🤣🤣🤣🤣