those are shadows of Iblis and like any shadow imitates the light and measuring them from meka I can say that it is a simple society of Muslim brotherhood in the entrance of Jemen.
I'm so confused about azhar university.. because we have qurans that come from there.. would it then be wrong to purchase those qurans or anything that comes from azhar?
..I find your reasoning at double standards and infact your knowledge of events is limited as you do not seem to be much learned in the actual facts...This is how the Saudi govt. sponsored Salafis spread their version for political reasons which recognize the monarchy as acceptable in islam by using the Hadith wrongly (which mentions not to revolt against a Ruler) ...Hassan Al banna had originally been brought up in a wrong environment of sufism , but he later changed and came to the true Fundamentals of Tawhid...So please dont twist the facts and serve your Saudi masters 1. Firstly you accusations that Muslim brotherhood is greatest Trial in this century, What can be more ignorant statement than that. It was Muslim brotherhood which at the height of Arab Nationalism opposed these Secularists who wanted to seperate Islam from Political and social life...Muslim brotherhood endured extreme forms of torture, imprisonment and hardships in places like Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Tunisia...whereas the Salafis were altogether missing and had become pawns of the Saudi Govt. 2. You echo the words of the Government purchased Scholars who call themself Salafi ...that Ikhwaan Muslimeen lead to the birth of Alqaeda , ISIS etc...I am sorry that analogy is faulty. The members who formed Alqaeda disagreed with the peaceful way of Ikhwaan Ul Muslimeen and called on to implement by Force the removal of Tyrants, secular corrupt regimes and the western agents...Just because some seperated from Ikhwaan ul muslimeen doesnt mean Muslim brotherhood created them. And why don't you speak about Salafis who have actually Generated the likes of the Khawarij of Juhayman who in 1979 which his extremist followers had caused bloodshed in the Masjid Haram ! Juhayman and many of his members were Students of Ibn Baaz. So should be accuse Ibn Baaz as the cause of these extremists? And Let me tell you one more thing- Since Ibn Taymiyyah is a Renowned Scholar and accepted by Salafis as a Mujtahid , I also Accept he was a True Scholar of Islam- Let me explain some truth- You Saudi sponsored Salafis say Talking against the Ruler and opposing him is not allowed in Islam...if that is right then let me ask you something- Didn't Ibn Taymiyyah oppose the Kings of his time and speak against their Corrupt ruling system ? He was imprisoned multiple times. So who is right your Current purchased Scholars or Ibn Taymiyyah? 3. And Regarding your current saudi Mufti Aal Sheikh, he goes on to say that Hazrat Hussain made a mistake and should have submitted to Yazid...All our Reputed Sunni Scholars from Ibn Taymiyyah and even the Sahabah at that time were clearly of the View that Yazid was wrong as their is no kingdom in Islam. Hazrat Hussein is considered Correct and so was Hazrat Zubair who fought Yazids army in Madina and Mecca. Another thing your grand Mufti says is that all Churches in Arab and Muslim countries should be destroyed. What extremism is this, this is exactly the mentality of ISIS and not Ikhwaan. If what your mutfi says is right, then what about the first 4 Caliphs of Islam when they conquered Christian Byzantine areas did not demolish any Churches- So are the Caliphs of Islam right or your grand Mufti ? And regarding Ibn Baaz- even he made blunders...Duriing the Invasions of Kuwait in 1990 - many Islamic Scholars like Salman Ouda and Safar Hawalli protested the involvement of US and non muslim troops in the holy land and affairs of Muslim nations...They protested that the Muslim countries together should evict Iraqis out of Kuwait. But Ibn Baaz due to pressure of Saudi govt. issued a fatwa that its permissible to allow Americans in Saudi and muslim countries ....Can you see now what has happened due to that- the invasion and destruction of Iraq and killing of a million Iraqis due to it and before that the 1991 sanctions killed half a million Iraqi infants due to lack of Medicine- at which time none of your Salafi rich countries did anything to prevent these deaths. When Ikhwaan Muslimeen says its allowed to participate in democracy and come to power and slowly change the Society and then Implement a complete Islamic political system- the salafis cry that Ikhwaan is misguided and astray....But after the 2011 removal of Mubarak in Egypt...the Salafist Nour party participated in Elections - And later when the people started protesting against the legally elected goverment of which the Nour party had big share in Parliament- They backstabbed the Muslim brotherhood and backed the Army for their own reasons(most likely pressured by the Saudi Salafists- because if they dont listen to them they will loose funding).... So i can clearly see the double standards, Hypocrisy and games of the Saudi sponsored Salafists. They are anything but not following the way of the Sahabah and even the teachings of Ibn Taymiyyah especially in the political part because Politics is a very essential part of Islamic system.
Ahmed Rb really good points here...I've always been confused because I have always believed that the muslim Brotherhood is based on principles of quran and sunnah...The likes of sainabul gazzali suffered so much for islam...The saudi govt is just a puppet to israel and the US
@Nazneen Ali, A puppet how? Fear Allah, you're living in the west and benefiting in the west yet you talk of the Saudis. Have you been there? Also the originator takes principles of the Salaf lightly for indeed the Most beloved of Prophets (May peace be upon Him) praised them. Now unless you have clear evidence, its best to go and learn the religion of Allah before you say such stuff. Fear Allah and seek refuge in him to be guided because in the day of judgement you might find yourself with those Americans and Israelis.
Did Ibn Taymiya went to jail for creating a movement to remove the ruler so that Ibn Taymiya can become the ruler? I don't think so. You have been brainwashed brother. May Allah show you the right way.
@@TareqKhan0 brother this is so irrelevant. Why would Ibn Taymiyyah need to form a group to become the Caliph? The problem is, you think you are making really good and articulated points that your echo Chambers reaffirm. Comparing the times of Ibn Taymiyyah to today where the khilafah has been destroyed and divided into nation states through the selling out of governments and decolonisation is such a strawman I don't really know where to start. I'm not apart of Muslim brotherhood, but I'll defend them against false allegations and misunderstandings and adhoc presuppositions, as such I will critique them in their method. IM themselves even admit that working with them specifically isn't the obligation, but to work for the reestablishment of the khilafah via the method of Rasoolallah (pbuh) is obligatory (just like any other Fard in the deen). Brothers like the one giving the talk, and Abu Khadeejah, are simply not fit to give talks on the following ; they have very little understanding of the Deen of Allah generally. They hinder the conversations of the Ummah, and are stuck in conversations that happened 1000 years ago! Schools like the Qadariyyah and Khawarij and Mu'tazilah are dead theological schools of Islam. Khawarij, as an example, rebelled against the khulafaa rashida. We havent even got a khilafah to rebel against. Yes we have people who still think like them loosely, but this shouldn't divert the vital matter
![MAF Teeski - Whole Thing (feat. VonOff1700) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SHWEj-ndz6g/mqdefault.jpg)
As Ustaad Abu Iyaad explains the da'wah of Hassan al-Banna and what he called to, it resembles the da'wah of Yasir Qadhi, there are many similarities
Allhamdulliah
those are shadows of Iblis and like any shadow imitates the light and measuring them from meka I can say that it is a simple society of Muslim brotherhood in the entrance of Jemen.
I'm so confused about azhar university.. because we have qurans that come from there.. would it then be wrong to purchase those qurans or anything that comes from azhar?
Bint Rasheed the noble Quran
No clue just don't get the English translation "the clear Quran." It has Ash'ari beliefs in it.
Stick to the Taqi Uddin Hilali Muhsin Khan version.
Who is the shiekh he keeps quoting?
Sheikh michael jackson
I khwanis shuld be declared kafir.
Learn more about the conditions of takfeer.
An other evidence for the rule: المرجئة هم الجوارج
I don't know any salafi scholar that said that. Not every biddah takes people outside of the fold of Al Islam.
That’s a Madkhali after reading two PDFs by Abu Khadeeja right?
..I find your reasoning at double standards and infact your knowledge of events is limited as you do not seem to be much learned in the actual facts...This is how the Saudi govt. sponsored Salafis spread their version for political reasons which recognize the monarchy as acceptable in islam by using the Hadith wrongly (which mentions not to revolt against a Ruler) ...Hassan Al banna had originally been brought up in a wrong environment of sufism , but he later changed and came to the true Fundamentals of Tawhid...So please dont twist the facts and serve your Saudi masters
1. Firstly you accusations that Muslim brotherhood is greatest Trial in this century, What can be more ignorant statement than that. It was Muslim brotherhood which at the height of Arab Nationalism opposed these Secularists who wanted to seperate Islam from Political and social life...Muslim brotherhood endured extreme forms of torture, imprisonment and hardships in places like Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Tunisia...whereas the Salafis were altogether missing and had become pawns of the Saudi Govt.
2. You echo the words of the Government purchased Scholars who call themself Salafi ...that Ikhwaan Muslimeen lead to the birth of Alqaeda , ISIS etc...I am sorry that analogy is faulty. The members who formed Alqaeda disagreed with the peaceful way of Ikhwaan Ul Muslimeen and called on to implement by Force the removal of Tyrants, secular corrupt regimes and the western agents...Just because some seperated from Ikhwaan ul muslimeen doesnt mean Muslim brotherhood created them. And why don't you speak about Salafis who have actually Generated the likes of the Khawarij of Juhayman who in 1979 which his extremist followers had caused bloodshed in the Masjid Haram ! Juhayman and many of his members were Students of Ibn Baaz. So should be accuse Ibn Baaz as the cause of these extremists?
And Let me tell you one more thing- Since Ibn Taymiyyah is a Renowned Scholar and accepted by Salafis as a Mujtahid , I also Accept he was a True Scholar of Islam- Let me explain some truth-
You Saudi sponsored Salafis say Talking against the Ruler and opposing him is not allowed in Islam...if that is right then let me ask you something- Didn't Ibn Taymiyyah oppose the Kings of his time and speak against their Corrupt ruling system ? He was imprisoned multiple times. So who is right your Current purchased Scholars or Ibn Taymiyyah?
3. And Regarding your current saudi Mufti Aal Sheikh, he goes on to say that Hazrat Hussain made a mistake and should have submitted to Yazid...All our Reputed Sunni Scholars from Ibn Taymiyyah and even the Sahabah at that time were clearly of the View that Yazid was wrong as their is no kingdom in Islam. Hazrat Hussein is considered Correct and so was Hazrat Zubair who fought Yazids army in Madina and Mecca.
Another thing your grand Mufti says is that all Churches in Arab and Muslim countries should be destroyed. What extremism is this, this is exactly the mentality of ISIS and not Ikhwaan. If what your mutfi says is right, then what about the first 4 Caliphs of Islam when they conquered Christian Byzantine areas did not demolish any Churches- So are the Caliphs of Islam right or your grand Mufti ?
And regarding Ibn Baaz- even he made blunders...Duriing the Invasions of Kuwait in 1990 - many Islamic Scholars like Salman Ouda and Safar Hawalli protested the involvement of US and non muslim troops in the holy land and affairs of Muslim nations...They protested that the Muslim countries together should evict Iraqis out of Kuwait. But Ibn Baaz due to pressure of Saudi govt. issued a fatwa that its permissible to allow Americans in Saudi and muslim countries ....Can you see now what has happened due to that- the invasion and destruction of Iraq and killing of a million Iraqis due to it and before that the 1991 sanctions killed half a million Iraqi infants due to lack of Medicine- at which time none of your Salafi rich countries did anything to prevent these deaths.
When Ikhwaan Muslimeen says its allowed to participate in democracy and come to power and slowly change the Society and then Implement a complete Islamic political system- the salafis cry that Ikhwaan is misguided and astray....But after the 2011 removal of Mubarak in Egypt...the Salafist Nour party participated in Elections - And later when the people started protesting against the legally elected goverment of which the Nour party had big share in Parliament- They backstabbed the Muslim brotherhood and backed the Army for their own reasons(most likely pressured by the Saudi Salafists- because if they dont listen to them they will loose funding)....
So i can clearly see the double standards, Hypocrisy and games of the Saudi sponsored Salafists. They are anything but not following the way of the Sahabah and even the teachings of Ibn Taymiyyah especially in the political part because Politics is a very essential part of Islamic system.
Ahmed Rb really good points here...I've always been confused because I have always believed that the muslim Brotherhood is based on principles of quran and sunnah...The likes of sainabul gazzali suffered so much for islam...The saudi govt is just a puppet to israel and the US
@Nazneen Ali, A puppet how? Fear Allah, you're living in the west and benefiting in the west yet you talk of the Saudis. Have you been there? Also the originator takes principles of the Salaf lightly for indeed the Most beloved of Prophets (May peace be upon Him) praised them. Now unless you have clear evidence, its best to go and learn the religion of Allah before you say such stuff. Fear Allah and seek refuge in him to be guided because in the day of judgement you might find yourself with those Americans and Israelis.
Ahmed Rb all your petty point have been answered, don’t ask on a RUclips video comment section, find out.
Did Ibn Taymiya went to jail for creating a movement to remove the ruler so that Ibn Taymiya can become the ruler? I don't think so. You have been brainwashed brother. May Allah show you the right way.
@@TareqKhan0 brother this is so irrelevant. Why would Ibn Taymiyyah need to form a group to become the Caliph? The problem is, you think you are making really good and articulated points that your echo Chambers reaffirm. Comparing the times of Ibn Taymiyyah to today where the khilafah has been destroyed and divided into nation states through the selling out of governments and decolonisation is such a strawman I don't really know where to start.
I'm not apart of Muslim brotherhood, but I'll defend them against false allegations and misunderstandings and adhoc presuppositions, as such I will critique them in their method. IM themselves even admit that working with them specifically isn't the obligation, but to work for the reestablishment of the khilafah via the method of Rasoolallah (pbuh) is obligatory (just like any other Fard in the deen). Brothers like the one giving the talk, and Abu Khadeejah, are simply not fit to give talks on the following ; they have very little understanding of the Deen of Allah generally. They hinder the conversations of the Ummah, and are stuck in conversations that happened 1000 years ago! Schools like the Qadariyyah and Khawarij and Mu'tazilah are dead theological schools of Islam. Khawarij, as an example, rebelled against the khulafaa rashida. We havent even got a khilafah to rebel against. Yes we have people who still think like them loosely, but this shouldn't divert the vital matter