I'd say it would be like this: Germany declares war on poland Poland: Wtf dude we're allies! Germany: Oh fuck you're right *Germany and Poland have signed white peace* A more realistic one: Nothing happens
Two nato countries declaring war on eachother would make nato declare war or they would kick out both members or just the aggressor but the most realistic option is they would try to negotiate them to peace
Yeah. But if Germany was to declare war on more countries, NATO would either ignore that thing and just do article 5, since a potential 3rd World War would want to be avoided at all cost.
Its always germany because its always been.the world is actually germany.water is beer.everyone speaks differently but theyre actually german.history is a lie and germany is the first and the last.
erm, technically, Poland could make a very harsh resistance, and considering Poland and Germany have similar military, there would be chance that Poland would win in 1v1
@@Lurchis_watchGermany still has the capability of making a strong army, considering Germany has a gdp of 4T compared to Poland’s 700B and a population of 85M compared to Poland’s 35M Plus Poland has to use some of it’s military on defense along its border with Kaliningrad grad and Belarus Not saying that they would win, just that it’s certainly a possibility
Article 5 wouldn't be used unless Germany leaves NATO first. All that would happen would be that Germany and Poland would lose their aid until they're done
Article 5 says that an attack on one is an attack on all. It doesn't specify that the attack has to be from a non NATO country, so if any country attacks - they're doomed. NATO doesn't serve to protect aggression amongst the members
this war would probably be a stalemate because the military power of both nations are almost equal and any occupied territory would receive harsh resistance from the populus
Well made video, but this relies on an assumption that NATO will join the war if 2 NATO members fight or declare war on each other then NATO only kicks the aggressor out of NATO and places sanctions. Don't say that Germany left NATO either, that's completely nonsensical considering that they would get the benefit of not having direct war with NATO if they just kept the plan secret and didn't leave.
Realistically poland Is not winning and they wouldn’t push the article 5 button immediately they would try to settle the conflict with diplomacy and if that fails they don’t send stuff to either side
This simply isn’t true. Article 5 would only be enabled if a country outside of NATO did that. Germany and Poland are both in NATO, so nothing would happen.
No, article 4 is a provision that allows member countries to bring any issue of concern, particularly related to security, to the table for consultation among all member states. It's the beginning of article 5 in a nutshell.
Mapping:"Poland is defeated by germany."
Reality: "A R T I C L E 5"
Objection article 4
@@williambailey8340ye
"Keep the Americans in, keep the Russians out, and keep the Germans down" -some guy describing the reason for founding NATO
WHY IS THIS VIDEO ACTUALLY POPULAR BRO
Or well, since Germany is also part of NATO, what NATO would do is send troops to stop the war between two countries in the same alliance
I'd say it would be like this:
Germany declares war on poland
Poland: Wtf dude we're allies!
Germany: Oh fuck you're right
*Germany and Poland have signed white peace*
A more realistic one: Nothing happens
country declaring war on its ally accidentally seems too believable
Two nato countries declaring war on eachother would make nato declare war or they would kick out both members or just the aggressor but the most realistic option is they would try to negotiate them to peace
@@BananappleboyI mean, wasn’t there an incident where Poland accidentally invaded a Czech town
Actually if two nato members fight, they will try to stop it but not join the war.
Yea your right
I was gonna say this lol 😂
Yeah. But if Germany was to declare war on more countries, NATO would either ignore that thing and just do article 5, since a potential 3rd World War would want to be avoided at all cost.
Nothing about that in the nato treaty. If a nato member country is attacked it can activate article 5. Even if that other country is also part of nato
@9_9876 if the attacking country attacks more countries, then they can use article 5
even if no one would interfere, I doubt poland would lose this time. they have a huge military.
I agree with this…(kinda)
im making a flipaclip video that will be called when you cant afford hoi4
good luck
@@aboutdash i still working on it :,)
Nice video
Thanks
That’s why in mapping you have assumptions.
Mapping at Ger💲:ye, I'd win
Reality:A R T I C L E F I V E
Article 5 only applies to non nato countries
Yoo ur mongolian im mongolian too
As A Geologic Russian, I Can Agree that In Reality, Germany could Get Krakow BUT, No Country has to Interfere or Aid Poland for That.
WHY ITS ALWAYS POLAND
Cuz yes
It's always Germany bruh
fr
Its always germany because its always been.the world is actually germany.water is beer.everyone speaks differently but theyre actually german.history is a lie and germany is the first and the last.
I prefer unrealistic scenarios better than realise scenarios.
NATO would not declare war on Germany unless the invade fully
ARTICLE NUMERO SINCO
why does germany also take over Belarus ?
i accidently added belarus on the war
erm, technically, Poland could make a very harsh resistance, and considering Poland and Germany have similar military, there would be chance that Poland would win in 1v1
yea but the chances of germany winning is far more
As a German i need to disagree, the German Army can barely get socks to all their troops
@@Lurchis_watchGermany still has the capability of making a strong army, considering Germany has a gdp of 4T compared to Poland’s 700B and a population of 85M compared to Poland’s 35M
Plus Poland has to use some of it’s military on defense along its border with Kaliningrad grad and Belarus
Not saying that they would win, just that it’s certainly a possibility
@@BogaBoga True but bureacracy be crazy, still nice vid though
germany has a much larger economy and can easily ramp up their military
Article 5 wouldn't be used unless Germany leaves NATO first. All that would happen would be that Germany and Poland would lose their aid until they're done
Article 5 says that an attack on one is an attack on all. It doesn't specify that the attack has to be from a non NATO country, so if any country attacks - they're doomed. NATO doesn't serve to protect aggression amongst the members
in this video germany did leave to attack poland ofc
this is not how NATO works.
@@lmao.3661 that's literally what happened when Greece and turkey fought. Their aid was cut off
this war would probably be a stalemate because the military power of both nations are almost equal and any occupied territory would receive harsh resistance from the populus
So true
Fr
Well made video, but this relies on an assumption that NATO will join the war if 2 NATO members fight or declare war on each other then NATO only kicks the aggressor out of NATO and places sanctions.
Don't say that Germany left NATO either, that's completely nonsensical considering that they would get the benefit of not having direct war with NATO if they just kept the plan secret and didn't leave.
Realistically poland Is not winning and they wouldn’t push the article 5 button immediately they would try to settle the conflict with diplomacy and if that fails they don’t send stuff to either side
poland today is militarily stronger than germany and is continuing to arm.
@@lmao.3661 ah yes a barely stronger nation can take out one of the richest countries on earth
Art8cal 4 is reason why article 5 wouldn't work
mapping and countryballs fell off in years later
later?
@@OrangeMan7 so it fell off already?
@@sorelighttN O N e v e F e L L L i L k i d 😂
@@Tailsfromsonic-f3o what?
@@Tailsfromsonic-f3o what do you mean?
This simply isn’t true. Article 5 would only be enabled if a country outside of NATO did that. Germany and Poland are both in NATO, so nothing would happen.
Such invasion of NATO member and NATO members happened before
😂
he’s wrong article 5 will not happen because Germany is also NATO
And article 4 says if 2ccountries in nato became war nato will not fight but try to lower hostiles
wtf borders
? whats wrong with the borders
@@aboutdash they look off and random compared to the original map
???
@@EHMMikr
@@aboutdashhe means the new borders of Germany and Poland
bro uses the worst font on flipaclip
i dont use it anymore
@@aboutdash Thats good
Heres my problem with the mapping community, they arent original and make the same content, they are toxic and they are kids.
I know
Someone hated me on like me 3rd video
His mapping is bad by the way
The reality is, even without nato Poland woud win.
article 4.
when its nato country vs nato country, its article 4, not 5.
you showed a lie, not the reality.
wait no in this vid germany left the nato to attack poland
No, article 4 is a provision that allows member countries to bring any issue of concern, particularly related to security, to the table for consultation among all member states. It's the beginning of article 5 in a nutshell.
Why do people even use flipaclip? Phones are trash PC is always better at everything.
Dude i dont kbow how or what app i should abimate on pc
And im on a vacation to italy so i cant upload on pc
Blud thinks he's AGL
???
What's a agl
@@aboutdash AGL Productions
@@Jdudeo1 still dont know who that is im gonna search who he is