@@KittyCat-qg4vdOMG , the Ford Carrier is obsolete…. Only the superior Chinese knock off carriers are the true masters of the seas …. 😂😂😂 they can’t even get the catapults to work , and sea trails will probably last until it’s sunk by a US fighter during the up coming thrashing the PLA and PLANavy will receive at the hands of the US , Japanese , Taiwanese , Australian, British navies and Airforces 😂😂😂
This video gave me an idea you might to cover: I always wondered how russia deals with customers of their military gear when they call back saying that their products aren't performing as advertised. EDIT: 15:51 Also, what the hell is a Tu-190? A plane _even_ more stealthy than the PAK-DA?
Yo the Russians are going to display US M1 Abrams, the so called "invincible tank" in their exposition of defeated NATO equipment and the best part is this: Apparently the leader of NATO begged to Putin to cancel the display of M1 Abrams because this will look like Russia defeated NATO and he made it worst by claiming NATO hasn't done anything in the war. He is making a indirect claim that NATO didn't send any help to Ukraine and all those billions of dolars and millions shells, munitions and war machines sent by NATO countries is a thing of our imagination. That NATO really is stuck in his own little bubble world. I can't wait to see the exposition, this will help destroying the American arrogance and finally make peace possible. Both Ukraine and Russia wants peace but Ukraine is a US puppet country and only reason all peace attempts failed is because of the US who keeps making unreasonable demands as if Ukraine had already won.
Sakazam a gde je vas b2 sto je pao u hrvatsku da li su vam to rekli i 2 f 117 za jedan znate imao je tehnicki kvar o neva drugi pao u hrvatsku eto koliko su vam dobri vasi avioni izvinite nismo znali da je.nevidljiv😊
@@KD-wl3fk da prvi f 117 je pao u srbiji drugi je pogodjen itesko sleteo u hrvatsku a b2 pogodjen i pao u hrvatsku i 7 dana su delove odvozili kamionima u velikoj tajnosti da se nesazna za sve vreme rata sa nato izgubljena su samo 13 vozila i oko 900 vojnika a vasi gubici 495 vojnika i pilota 19 helikoptera apac i nekoliko hiljada albanskih terorista imas puno toga na internetu druze.moj kad bi kod vas imalo demokratije znali bi ste svaku istinu nadam se da ce gospodin Tramp pobediti pozdrav
I mean - i think they should focus on making the SU-57's stealth better than an F/A-18 super hornets or hell - even PRODUCING the damn thing, but hey, that's just me
Nah, wrong. If you were like Russia it would look like: "So many plans, so much cash, nothing works, it all fault of the rotten West!" while packing your pockets with stolen money.
There is absolutely no way the B21 only has a range of 2500 miles. The B2 has a range of 6000 miles, The B52 has a range of 8800 miles, and the B1 has a range of 7500 miles. They are not replacing the B1 and B2 with a "long range bomber" that only has 1/3 of their range. A simple google search shows Popular Mechanics estimates that the B21 has a range of 6500 miles which is probably fairly accurate given the range of the other long range bombers currently in use by the USA. A range of 2500 miles would barely be enough to fly from New York to LA or from LA to Hawaii.
@@Grim_Reaper_from_Hell I’m not a military expert, but the range is 6500 miles. The United States will not develop a plane that has less range. It makes no sense.
@@larrybelton5489 the original source, I believe, was some sort of Australian purchase agreement so it may be the range of the export version of the bomer. Who knows
The whole "only air force to operate a stealth bomber" does exist in the context of only 3 countries still operating bombers at all, stealth or otherwise.
That’s probably exactly what they want America is going broke, their growth in national debt is unsustainable Growing by a trillion dollars approx every 100 days How long til that house of cards falls? Well you could accelerate it by baiting them into spending hundreds of billions on aircraft development to counter a threat that doesn’t even exist
actually they claim its the same weight at the b-2 bomber with a similar max take off weight of 112 tons and a payload still larger than the b-2 at 30 tons. but thats just one russian source its not like the Russian military is saying any of this. it looks likely this will never get built but who knows!
@CubeInspector haha no they're not. The Soviets were good at rocket engines, but jet engines have always been shit. Chris is giving the Russians way too much credit. They lie everytime about their capabilities, including their jet engines. Remember the Foxbat? They claimed it could do Mach 3.2+ and claimed it was made mostly of titanium. But we eventually got our hands on one and figured out quickly that it was a heavy slow bird. First, it would yard sale itself if pushed much pass 90% throttle and it was made of nickel steel, not titanium. That's how we made the best fighter jet ever made; the F-15
55 seconds into the video: I've created my own stealth bomber, the "F U" bomber, which has a range of 10,000 miles, in service and operated by the UK military😤🇬🇧
I find it hard to believe the stated range estimates of Russian/Chinese equipment when it's said they lag behind in engine technology and are getting heavy "influence" from US made equivalent aircraft. When you put it into that perspective, the only way they're getting that range is if they're replacing the payload with extra fuel capacity and a magic carpet.
Russian military aircraft have excellent range. The SU-35 fighter escorted Putin all the way from Moscow to the UAE without re-fueling or drop tanks, something no western fighter could do.. The TU-160 has a range of over 7500 miles and the wings of the PAK-DA have room for some huge fuel tanks. It is foolish to let biases cloud reality.
@@ramrod9556also a few of western aircraft have longer ranges like f16, f15, Rafale but others are not far behind and why should they if Europe is smaller than russia distance wise
B-21 only has 2500 NM? Very obvious mistake here. This means it has less range than a B-25 from WW2 era. B-21 is estimated to have a range equal or further than the B-2 (I.e. >8000NM)
In fact, Kazan is the 5th biggest city in Russia, with 3,3 millions (1,3 millions residents and 2 millions more in the metropolitan area...) But hey, Geography was never the strength of US Education System :p
Yea no doubt. I quickly looked and some site said it was 8th with 1.2+M, but still. It's definitely not just some small city in Russia . Compared to other large cities around the world or say in the US, sure. - Obviously not even then. As stated below, it wouldn't even be small compared to average US cities.
@@wanderer10k A metropolitan area population of almost 2 million people is not particularly big. That's about the same as the Fresno metropolitan population.
@@SirSayakaMikiThe3rd That doesn't change the fact that it is still a large city. And the Fresnoetropolitan area has a population of 1.171 million. Fresno City has a population of 542,107.
There is no need to worry, the PAK DA has not disappeared anywhere, it is being developed together with the MiG-41. The time will come and they will show you everything.
This engine air intake design would put the engine at higher risk of FOD due to the intake's area length and high suction pressure possibly sucking surrounding intake panels and screws if proper maintenance is not consistent.
@@alexanderbelov6892 Поверь! Русские придумают какой-нибудь гаджет для этого. В инструкции будет написано-"доработать напильником если не подойдёт". И установят пару десятков мировых рекордов))😜
With in-flight refueling? Or are you saying without fueling? And yes, I realize theoretically (not technically) with in-flight refueling the distance is determined by other components other than fuel.
that mistake slipped through the cracks I apologize for missing that. I try to double check all the numbers but sometimes I miss errors. honest mistake I thought it sounded weird as I was saying it. im a dummy : / I feel pretty bad about that slip up
This vid is littered with stupid mistakes, Kazan is only one of them. Talks about the TU-2 - shows model of Tu-22, What is this new Tu-190 aircraft? The model was the Tu-160 and plenty more elementary or just careless howlers. This guy has ZERO credibility - click bait crap
@@beibotanov you should feel blessed, Rusky. Imagine what toys the US would have if the M.I.C. wasn't charging the government 90k for a bag of bushings.
Plenty of material on that. The Philipino dictators want all that sea to themselves for their broke country. (turns out remaining feudal in 2024 doesn't work, who knew?) So they illegally stranded a navy ship in Chinese territory, manned it and now claim to have a military base there and claim 200 miles in every direction as theirs. China doesn't like people threatening its lifeline trade and wouldn't mind finding some oil or gas so they don't 100% rely on imports, so they claim the maximum and some more besides. China also doesn't like Moscow's obedient servants in Ho Chi Minh city This could be taken care of in five minutes if they made a deal to never tax or threaten Chinese shipping and agree to sell whatever they find in the sea without blockade or boycot, but hey, dictators be dictators and if Duterte Junior goes against the feudal elite to fix the underlying issues, he'd 'accidentally fall out of a window' in mere days. So it'll continue for a while.
The 3D model that is described as Tu-160 (at 1:42 and 5:06) is in fact the one of an early Tu-22M (the later ones have inlets similar to F-15). Tu-160 has underwing air inlets.
It isn't as stupid as it sounds. Russia has 3 branches of aviation: Long-Range, Front-Line and Naval. So the development program is ПАК (Prospective Aviation Complex) and the sub programmes are for each department. ДА is of course the Long-Range Aviation branch, ФА is Front-line Aviation (Su-57) and as far as I am aware there is no current Naval programme in progress because their aircraft carrier spends 95% of its time in dock anyway.
I've been working on a new stealth bomber, too. I estimate a range of 128,000 km. I've just got to wirk out how the engines attach to the paper fuselage.
@@basila33 Although the Tu-22M Backfire probably should have been called a Tu-23 or some other number, since it was such a different aircraft from the original Tu-22 Blinder.
That plane is the stealthiest plane ever built, because even the pilots couldn't find it. No, even better: The plane is so stealthy that even the plans for it were written with invisible ink. They simply can't build it.
Yeah, they're out of ammo, fighting with shovels and ww2 tanks, bla bla bla, everyone in the country is either deceased or rebelling, they're broke, cant make ammo or missiles and definitely can't sell oil anymore. Right? Right?
@@radustana Many types of planes exist. That does not mean they are what they claim to be. Most likely B2 is obsolete by now and can be detected by low-band and targeting radars. Why use it then instead of something cheaper?
If you believe that Ukrainian claim, you are delusional. a Tu-22M that fell out of the sky over Stavropol Krai is too far from the frontlines for it to be a Ukrainian kill, let alone with an outdated S-200 system.
Hi mate, always enjoy your vids so imagine my surprise when below your pic the vid title was shown as " transparent try on haul"!!!!! Hilarious 😁😁😁. I do TRULY hope its a youtube glitch!!!!
I think you mean a telescopic sight. or a Scope. A telescopic sight, commonly called a scope informally, is an optical sighting device based on a refracting telescope.[1] It is equipped with some form of a referencing pattern - known as a reticle - mounted in a focally appropriate position in its optical system to provide an accurate point of aim. Telescopic sights are used with all types of systems that require magnification in addition to reliable visual aiming, as opposed to non-magnifying iron sights, reflector (reflex) sights, holographic sights or laser sights, and are most commonly found on long-barrel firearms, particularly rifles, usually via a scope mount. Similar devices are also found on other platforms such as artillery, tanks and even aircraft.[2][3] The optical components may be combined with optoelectronics to add night vision or smart device features.
and We shouldn't Doubt, you should look into this. Technical intelligence (TECHINT) is the process of collecting, processing, and sharing information about the weapons and equipment used by other countries' armed forces. TECHINT also includes information about foreign science, technology, and weapon systems. The goal of TECHINT is to: Prevent technological surprises, Assess foreign scientific and technical capabilities, and Develop countermeasures to neutralize an adversary's technological advantages.
@@michaels5210 nah, everyone who really needs an optic in their everyday job has one. Bought by themselves, it's what their wages are for basically. Imperfect, yet works
@@beibotanov that’s not what any media release says. Media releases by both Ukraine and Russia. Even press releases by the Russian government about the shiny new AK12 show soldiers with AK12’s lacking sights, lasers, lights, or anything.
Easily targeting ? Russian bombers use long range cruise missiles and ballistic missiles The kh22/32 range 2000km The kh101/102 range is 4500km Kh69 range is 400km Etc No air defense system have the range of even 300km imagine 4500km Also every bomber can carry 12 to 16 missile and thats is enough to destroy any system in the world
Imo it is quite interesting to see differences between patent drawings and animation, there seem to be few changes making it more efficient subsonic aircraft with less compromised aerodynamics by stealth (winglets and intakes mainly).
And now the experts to tell us how it will never be a reality or how supposedly it will be in low numbers. May I ask what happend to that 750 f22 jets and ended up with 190 or something. I mean the plan for the b21 which isnt even out yet is tohave 200 units produced but lets wait and see if that doesnt become something like 70.
production of modern equipment is hard and takes time. The T-14 is 10 years old yet suffers the same problems your describing, its taken 2 years into Ukraine for Russian industry to kick into second gear and sustained their tank fleet in some limited capacity in this prolonged war. Take into account Tanks have a much lower bar to entry than a stealth fighter, so the fact that the US can produce 190 is impressive, even if it should probably be outputting closer to 750. Russia should be glad America is this inefficient, even now the American air force would wipe the floor, imagine if America gets into a modern war and we learn how to produce at peak efficiency like we did during world war 2?
@@corneliusmcmuffin3256 ,,production of modern equipment is hard and takes time" Dang I wish most of you guys realised that when the Armata and su57 came out. Though I think you will get it when the russians start to laugh about the 10 pathers, 5 chally 3 and the 20 at best new gen abrams are all that western armies can muster. It has taken 2 years nope less than a year to start mass producing stuff and start going back to the soviet capabilities. Though if in an all out war, the russians can in a matter of months do that, build back the factories and machines, get the personal and soldier. You know why ? Because they are in full control of their MIC, the west isnt. In russia its a matter of national security, in the west its a business, thats that major difference The armat wss presented 10 years ago just like the germans presented their new panther which will come into existence in about 10 years from now IF everything goes smoothly, IF ! The armata finished its trials in late 2022, since then there have been rumors for its mass production but nothing concrete, the russians would probably hide the real numbers built for a reason. They posted 190 over the course of 15 years if the full plan for production was to be realised it would have taken more than 2 trillion dollars and up to 2030 yo 2040 to complete the 750 units. America would not be able to do anything because the only way for them to utilise most if their airforce is via the bases in europe and their carriers, since the cold war countermeasures for both have been created, from the high tech subs to the carrier killers to the tactical nukes carrier by supersonic missiles.
I remember that being disproven. there was a whole lot of fake shit circulating around the first two weeks or so of the war. Remember when the invasion first started and people were uploading Arma III footage and saying its from ukraine? remember the girls that would livestream a video of air defense on loop from across the globe claiming to be ukrainian for money? im glad all that shit stopped. Anyway my point is anything from those first 15~ days of the war is probably not very factual.
The flying wing design is not as much about the drag deduction as it is about payload to weight ratio. The high payload may be used to carry more weapons or more fuel.
Based on Russia's history of exaggerating the abilities of their weapons (and/or America overestimating them), I'd divide all of these estimates by two. Heck, that wooden mock-up might turn out to be the actual prototype!
Won't come, as long as the existing Soviet era designs can do the job, too. And when it comes, it always has the risk of being already obsolete and based on a economy that no longer exists.
The SU-57 wonder weapons is in production and it has already been used in Ukraine very successfully. Your biases and lack of knowledge are clogging your reasoning.
@@Angl0sax0nknight That's what we are told, reality is different. Just like we were told the Russians were using shovels to fight in this war, demoralized, using old chips from washing machines for their weapons, or that Russia was going to run out of missiles withing six months after the war started. Take what you here on our propagandist US/western media with a grain of salt, probably half of the stuff we are told its BS and fake news.
@6:20 you quote a common misconception of lift that is absolutely absurd: air doesn't magically move faster over the top of the wing to create some sort of vacuum/low pressure effect and that's not how lift works.
Non western aircraft not being stealthy acording to "experts" is basically a meme at this point. The hoops they will jump thru to reach those conclusions can be quite entertaining.
This comment has way less upvotes than it deserves. Russian way of doing things is "good enough works" instead of "world-class-wunderwaffen". Western "experts" have been proven wrong time and again since the beginning of the SMO, and they still continue producing bullshit copium. Well, seeing the type of comments and how many upvotes they have, they have their audience, I guess.
To all the people who wanna make the "Too stealthy that it disappeared" joke on this marvelous aircraft, remember that the Su-57 became the ("first 5th gen fighter jet to have a kill") in ukraine almost 2 years ago 😏
The first prototype of the PAK DA is almost assembled. But there are problems with electronics and the lack of engines for the bomber. But this is not scary, since the first two prototypes are static and are intended for strength testing. Only when the static prototypes pass this test will assembly of the flight prototypes begin.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Save 20% on your system and your first month is free when you sign up for Fast Protect Monitoring at simplisafe.com/task
How do you know it's a she and not a he?
@@KittyCat-qg4vdOMG , the Ford Carrier is obsolete…. Only the superior Chinese knock off carriers are the true masters of the seas …. 😂😂😂 they can’t even get the catapults to work , and sea trails will probably last until it’s sunk by a US fighter during the up coming thrashing the PLA and PLANavy will receive at the hands of the US , Japanese , Taiwanese , Australian, British navies and Airforces 😂😂😂
@@KittyCat-qg4vdnice but the rassian yeah that thing is sexy
This video gave me an idea you might to cover: I always wondered how russia deals with customers of their military gear when they call back saying that their products aren't performing as advertised.
EDIT: 15:51 Also, what the hell is a Tu-190? A plane _even_ more stealthy than the PAK-DA?
Yo the Russians are going to display US M1 Abrams, the so called "invincible tank" in their exposition of defeated NATO equipment and the best part is this: Apparently the leader of NATO begged to Putin to cancel the display of M1 Abrams because this will look like Russia defeated NATO and he made it worst by claiming NATO hasn't done anything in the war. He is making a indirect claim that NATO didn't send any help to Ukraine and all those billions of dolars and millions shells, munitions and war machines sent by NATO countries is a thing of our imagination. That NATO really is stuck in his own little bubble world. I can't wait to see the exposition, this will help destroying the American arrogance and finally make peace possible. Both Ukraine and Russia wants peace but Ukraine is a US puppet country and only reason all peace attempts failed is because of the US who keeps making unreasonable demands as if Ukraine had already won.
Military leaks that were not on the War Thunder forum, usually means there’s probably no plan to add said vehicle into the game.
Needs to be BUILT for WarThunder to add it. No WOT paper/made up tanks hahaha
Meh add it
😂😂that says a lot.
I believe in Aurora!
@@xxxlonewolf49 paper tanks exist in war thunder...
Sometimes you just know when the comment section is going to be 80% of people saying the same joke.
Which joke? I haven't seen it.
@@highdefinist9697 That's a shame
@@Omni0404the joke is stealthy.
@@rizkyadiyanto7922 as if us projects
@@highdefinist9697 Thats because we're so good at stealth you never even noticed our humour
It obviously disappeared because it’s invisible and that good at stealth
Just like the Su-57 and the T-14 Armata, the world's first stealth tank.
😅😅😅😅😅
Along with the uninterceptable Iscander.
To be fair, balsa wood and paper is *very* difficult to detect with radar
Exactly my thought when I saw the title. 😄
I heard this bomber is actually a Transformer in disguise: it transforms into a Russian general's newest Bentley.
It will probably transform itself into a pile of rubble on it's test flights.
Before 2021 I would have said you're right. Now? Not anymore.
Sakazam a gde je vas b2 sto je pao u hrvatsku da li su vam to rekli i 2 f 117 za jedan znate imao je tehnicki kvar o neva drugi pao u hrvatsku eto koliko su vam dobri vasi avioni izvinite nismo znali da je.nevidljiv😊
@@KD-wl3fk da prvi f 117 je pao u srbiji drugi je pogodjen itesko sleteo u hrvatsku a b2 pogodjen i pao u hrvatsku i 7 dana su delove odvozili kamionima u velikoj tajnosti da se nesazna za sve vreme rata sa nato izgubljena su samo 13 vozila i oko 900 vojnika a vasi gubici 495 vojnika i pilota 19 helikoptera apac i nekoliko hiljada albanskih terorista imas puno toga na internetu druze.moj kad bi kod vas imalo demokratije znali bi ste svaku istinu nadam se da ce gospodin Tramp pobediti pozdrav
@@KD-wl3fk Good story bro 👍🏻😆🤣
The Tu-160 doesn't get the credit it deserves - an intercontinental supersonic bomber that's bigger than a B52!
Marvel of engineering
Tu-160 won’t go within 50 miles of Ukraine border. Hardly a sign of marvellous tech.
" Russian firms buy $4 billion worth of India-made arms, pay in Indian rupee "
@@Dave5843-d9mIf it performs its task from the distance of 50 miles what is the reason to enter the Ukrainian airspace?
@@manichaean1888exactly, why risk it? To prove something to some geniuses on the RUclips comments section 😂
What Happened to Russia's New Stealth Bomber?
Russia: Yes.
I mean - i think they should focus on making the SU-57's stealth better than an F/A-18 super hornets or hell - even PRODUCING the damn thing, but hey, that's just me
They are upgrading the tu160m rn
Also their factories are focusing on su35 su34 ka52 cause they are the most useful in ukraine atm
@@RazorsharpLT It was always Alice chasing the Skunk!
The same thing that happened to US new corvettes and coast guard ships )
@@RazorsharpLT They should focus on getting out of Ukraine.
Man, I can relate to Russia...
So many plans, so little cash, all my own fault.
Nah, wrong. If you were like Russia it would look like: "So many plans, so much cash, nothing works, it all fault of the rotten West!" while packing your pockets with stolen money.
Then why yhey coming up with new weapons in ukraine?
🏆😂😂Except unlike russia, you have self-awareness.
@alexnderrrthewoke4479 the blyat mobile is truly revolutionary
@@alexnderrrthewoke4479when do you get your lunch break at the troll farm 🥱
So stealthy, it hasn't been spotted on the drawing board either
Nice 😎
Russia is easily capable of Designing a stealth bomber with a radar signature only slightly bigger than the Pentagon. How dare you insult them!
Its literally being developed
@@apathyguy8338 and patriot still cant detect it 😅
@@Castragroup yeah sure whatever your delusions tell you vatnik
There is absolutely no way the B21 only has a range of 2500 miles. The B2 has a range of 6000 miles, The B52 has a range of 8800 miles, and the B1 has a range of 7500 miles. They are not replacing the B1 and B2 with a "long range bomber" that only has 1/3 of their range. A simple google search shows Popular Mechanics estimates that the B21 has a range of 6500 miles which is probably fairly accurate given the range of the other long range bombers currently in use by the USA.
A range of 2500 miles would barely be enough to fly from New York to LA or from LA to Hawaii.
🎯🎯💯
I don’t know where this man gets his facts , 2500 mile range on the b21
It's all over the internet. B-21 can fly without refueling 2,500 miles
@@Grim_Reaper_from_Hell I’m not a military expert, but the range is 6500 miles. The United States will not develop a plane that has less range. It makes no sense.
@@larrybelton5489 the original source, I believe, was some sort of Australian purchase agreement so it may be the range of the export version of the bomer. Who knows
The whole "only air force to operate a stealth bomber" does exist in the context of only 3 countries still operating bombers at all, stealth or otherwise.
Do they want another F15 situation? Because lying about specs is how you get another F15.
That’s probably exactly what they want
America is going broke, their growth in national debt is unsustainable
Growing by a trillion dollars approx every 100 days
How long til that house of cards falls? Well you could accelerate it by baiting them into spending hundreds of billions on aircraft development to counter a threat that doesn’t even exist
The most gangster fighter of all time?
@@jeremyjackson8196they overhyped the foxbat, so we built the f-15 to counter that only to find out the foxbat was a lemon.
Even worse another way to get an F22 situation.
It's already too late, they just haven't told us yet. 😂
So you're telling me this thing is the size of a B-21 but carries twice as much load? How is that possible?
Soviet magic obviously
actually they claim its the same weight at the b-2 bomber with a similar max take off weight of 112 tons and a payload still larger than the b-2 at 30 tons. but thats just one russian source its not like the Russian military is saying any of this. it looks likely this will never get built but who knows!
The power of will
@CubeInspector haha no they're not. The Soviets were good at rocket engines, but jet engines have always been shit. Chris is giving the Russians way too much credit. They lie everytime about their capabilities, including their jet engines. Remember the Foxbat? They claimed it could do Mach 3.2+ and claimed it was made mostly of titanium. But we eventually got our hands on one and figured out quickly that it was a heavy slow bird. First, it would yard sale itself if pushed much pass 90% throttle and it was made of nickel steel, not titanium. That's how we made the best fighter jet ever made; the F-15
The user's manual is in Russian. 😂
55 seconds into the video: I've created my own stealth bomber, the "F U" bomber, which has a range of 10,000 miles, in service and operated by the UK military😤🇬🇧
The only thing unbelievable about that is that the UK is operating something new.
@@boejiden7093 Brutal, but true. 🤣
Hey, wiseguy, you forgot to mention that you design can carry 80 12,000 pound bombs or a dozen Czar Bombas...
Britannia rules the air 😂😂
@boejiden7093 sick burn!! Take that Prince Charles... oops, King Charles
I find it hard to believe the stated range estimates of Russian/Chinese equipment when it's said they lag behind in engine technology and are getting heavy "influence" from US made equivalent aircraft. When you put it into that perspective, the only way they're getting that range is if they're replacing the payload with extra fuel capacity and a magic carpet.
You will eat your words, the Russians are working with the Persians on the rug propulsion system. It will be on the war thunder forums soon.
Russian military aircraft have excellent range. The SU-35 fighter escorted Putin all the way from Moscow to the UAE without re-fueling or drop tanks, something no western fighter could do.. The TU-160 has a range of over 7500 miles and the wings of the PAK-DA have room for some huge fuel tanks. It is foolish to let biases cloud reality.
@@ramrod9556well russian fighters are big and carry alot more fuel... But are also alot heavier
@@ramrod9556also a few of western aircraft have longer ranges like f16, f15, Rafale but others are not far behind and why should they if Europe is smaller than russia distance wise
B-21 only has 2500 NM?
Very obvious mistake here.
This means it has less range than a B-25 from WW2 era.
B-21 is estimated to have a range equal or further than the B-2 (I.e. >8000NM)
Kazan a small city with almost 1,500,000 people?
its small compared to moscow and st petersburg
small russian Great Tatar
In fact, Kazan is the 5th biggest city in Russia, with 3,3 millions (1,3 millions residents and 2 millions more in the metropolitan area...) But hey, Geography was never the strength of US Education System :p
@@python3215 - 5th biggest city in Russia - as opposite to "small" - it has more population than the Baltic Countries :p
"Small russian city of Kazan" is 5th largest city in Russia, with population about 1.5 million.
Yea no doubt. I quickly looked and some site said it was 8th with 1.2+M, but still. It's definitely not just some small city in Russia . Compared to other large cities around the world or say in the US, sure.
- Obviously not even then. As stated below, it wouldn't even be small compared to average US cities.
That's small by US standards. Or used to be small by Russian standards.
@@RazorsharpLT It would be in the top 7 US cities.
@@wanderer10k
A metropolitan area population of almost 2 million people is not particularly big. That's about the same as the Fresno metropolitan population.
@@SirSayakaMikiThe3rd That doesn't change the fact that it is still a large city. And the Fresnoetropolitan area has a population of 1.171 million. Fresno City has a population of 542,107.
It is so stealthy , we never saw it in action
Yeah, probably never will either
All PLL that say this don't even know what is bomber and how it's work and doesn't even know how fighter plane made
@menzbercedes8962 fortunately, without Ukranian engineers - Russia doesn't know how fighter planes are made either.
Must be flying in space…
Duh...it hasn't been built yet🤡🤡
Are you dense?
There is no need to worry, the PAK DA has not disappeared anywhere, it is being developed together with the MiG-41. The time will come and they will show you everything.
This engine air intake design would put the engine at higher risk of FOD due to the intake's area length and high suction pressure possibly sucking surrounding intake panels and screws if proper maintenance is not consistent.
"intake panels"? What is this in XXI century?
@@alexanderbelov6892 Поверь! Русские придумают какой-нибудь гаджет для этого. В инструкции будет написано-"доработать напильником если не подойдёт". И установят пару десятков мировых рекордов))😜
2500 miles for the B-21? More like 6-8000 miles.
With in-flight refueling? Or are you saying without fueling? And yes, I realize theoretically (not technically) with in-flight refueling the distance is determined by other components other than fuel.
I mean it's smaller than the B2.
The B-21 is supposed to have greater range without refueling than the B-2.
he mightve thought it was 6-8000 KM, and converted it to miles. Idk. im reaching, but the eye math checks out.
that mistake slipped through the cracks I apologize for missing that. I try to double check all the numbers but sometimes I miss errors. honest mistake I thought it sounded weird as I was saying it. im a dummy : / I feel pretty bad about that slip up
Brilliant breakdown. Been looking forward to this episode. Thanks for making it, loads of great details that are hard to find elsewhere.
So stealthy, we didn't even detect it leaving the designer's notebook.
@@aniksamiurrahman6365 nice kursk ya got ther- oh.
How are those fighting with shovels and "running out of ammo soon" going?
The video editing is great in this one.
What a coincidence I was just researching this exact topic yesterday.
"Small Russian sity Kazan" deserves to be listed in the treasury of golden quotes
This vid is littered with stupid mistakes, Kazan is only one of them. Talks about the TU-2 - shows model of Tu-22, What is this new Tu-190 aircraft? The model was the Tu-160 and plenty more elementary or just careless howlers.
This guy has ZERO credibility - click bait crap
Tankie cope is the funniest cope
@@apollobouncer Конечно, конечно. Это просто опять "недружелюбная погода", верно?
@@nolongerblocked6210 guys who see tankie in everyone is even more funny. Pitiful.
@@worldoftancraft cry
What will arrive first? The production model or the yacht purchased by the oligarch who stole the R&D money? My money is on the yacht
- "Where is money you spend on stealth bomber?"
- "I thought you said spend money on 'Bomb Svetlana'."
extremely funny joke in light of 90k bushings bag
@@beibotanov you should feel blessed, Rusky. Imagine what toys the US would have if the M.I.C. wasn't charging the government 90k for a bag of bushings.
@@zachhoefs9543 yea but that also apply to what russia would be like if they didnt have people spending all the money on yacht
@@zachhoefs9543 this post feels like a butthurt
Hey have you thought about doing a video about what’s goin on between Philippines and China right now? Thanks for great content big fan!
Plenty of material on that. The Philipino dictators want all that sea to themselves for their broke country. (turns out remaining feudal in 2024 doesn't work, who knew?)
So they illegally stranded a navy ship in Chinese territory, manned it and now claim to have a military base there and claim 200 miles in every direction as theirs.
China doesn't like people threatening its lifeline trade and wouldn't mind finding some oil or gas so they don't 100% rely on imports, so they claim the maximum and some more besides.
China also doesn't like Moscow's obedient servants in Ho Chi Minh city
This could be taken care of in five minutes if they made a deal to never tax or threaten Chinese shipping and agree to sell whatever they find in the sea without blockade or boycot, but hey, dictators be dictators and if Duterte Junior goes against the feudal elite to fix the underlying issues, he'd 'accidentally fall out of a window' in mere days. So it'll continue for a while.
Excellent Analysis
The 3D model that is described as Tu-160 (at 1:42 and 5:06) is in fact the one of an early Tu-22M (the later ones have inlets similar to F-15). Tu-160 has underwing air inlets.
Вы правы👍
Это не Ту-160, и точно не Ту-22М. Больше похоже на Су-24, срез воздухозаборников у Ту-22М вниз…
@@Wlxd1519 Воздухозаборники вниз на Ту-22М3, а на предыдущих моделях - именно такие. И я об этом писал в предыдущем комментарии.
With all these cool new planes in the last 10-20 years we REALLY need another Ace Combat game! Come on Namco
I mean, if we're all having trouble looking for the new stealth bomber...
Lol, delusional.
Dude, it's so stealthy not even the Russians can find it.
IT'S STANDING BEHIND YOU RIGHT NOW
The Prospective Aviation Complex for Long-Range Aviation... brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department.
hey at least its modular
It isn't as stupid as it sounds. Russia has 3 branches of aviation: Long-Range, Front-Line and Naval. So the development program is ПАК (Prospective Aviation Complex) and the sub programmes are for each department. ДА is of course the Long-Range Aviation branch, ФА is Front-line Aviation (Su-57) and as far as I am aware there is no current Naval programme in progress because their aircraft carrier spends 95% of its time in dock anyway.
@@smalltime0 Cool, that explains why the name looks so goofy, though it does still look goofy.
Oh man, the DoRD. I laughed out loud at that. Thanks.
I've been working on a new stealth bomber, too. I estimate a range of 128,000 km. I've just got to wirk out how the engines attach to the paper fuselage.
Have been hearing about this since last 2 decades.
Tu-2 is not a thing. It was Tu-22. While saying Tu-160, it shows Tu-22m....
He was referring to the WW2 era bomber Tu-2 "Bat". He just showed the wrong aircraft in the video while talking about it
@@yomama629 Both depicted aircrafts where wrong. Both were TU-22s.. He also said TU-23M xD
@@yomama629 no, look at 12:01 - there is Tu-22M signed as Tu-23M which never exist.
@@basila33 Although the Tu-22M Backfire probably should have been called a Tu-23 or some other number, since it was such a different aircraft from the original Tu-22 Blinder.
That plane is the stealthiest plane ever built, because even the pilots couldn't find it.
No, even better: The plane is so stealthy that even the plans for it were written with invisible ink. They simply can't build it.
Yeah, they're out of ammo, fighting with shovels and ww2 tanks, bla bla bla, everyone in the country is either deceased or rebelling, they're broke, cant make ammo or missiles and definitely can't sell oil anymore.
Right?
Right?
It is so stealthty,even the aliens from area 51 cant see it 😂
B2 ... best known for its crash on the take-off
@@gdiwolverinemale4that least that plane exists,cant say the same about the pak da
@@radustana Many types of planes exist. That does not mean they are what they claim to be. Most likely B2 is obsolete by now and can be detected by low-band and targeting radars. Why use it then instead of something cheaper?
It was so stealthy they forgot where they parked it.
Darn it. The "find my plane feature isn't working." 😢
You mean the F35?
Good analysis cappy
Thanks for using my xian model. Looks like you obtain model and rendered yourself.
It’ll get shot down by an S 200 and then say it malfunctioned.
The aircraft or the S200? Oh now I get it. Both of them.
@@sawney_bean Thanks for the input, Boris. : )
@@sawney_bean Ah yes, because the F-35 got show down over America by Americans lmao
Pathetic
If you believe that Ukrainian claim, you are delusional. a Tu-22M that fell out of the sky over Stavropol Krai is too far from the frontlines for it to be a Ukrainian kill, let alone with an outdated S-200 system.
It's impossible! Show the new modification of s 200!
That Plane is so Stealthy, no one ever saw it, and never will !
I love the design of the Plane, Looks so sleek
They pushed it in the hanger with the Buran 😂
PAK DA is so stealth that we ain't going to see that plane for 15-25 years
Love your Content Bro, keep up the Grind. Stay Safe Good Sir.✌
You have the most informative and easy to understand vids on the web. Thank you
propaganda is always easy to understand
This dude talks complete nonsense and often just lies. Don't you have critical thinking?
3:30 Anyone else notice Chris' t-shirt change? 😂
The hat & gun(s) in the background moved, as well. Someone was tidying up!
I had to go back and check. I thought it was just me.
I’m sure all 3 wooden models that will be built will look formidable on the ground to the superiors.
I saw the stealth tech in the broken arrow movie and was so impressed by it.
It really sucks when you want to build a high tech, big ticket, bomber and find out you have severe corruption.
Yeah, corruption is everywhere in the global military industrial complex. No country can escape it.
extremely funny joke in light of 90k bushings bag
@@beibotanov jokes on you the American budget is so much bigger than Russia's that we could flatten Moskow in paper bills
@@corneliusmcmuffin3256 haha! True we don’t even need bombs.
Wow... Must be pretty stealthy!
Napkinwaffen.
LOL!
Except napkins exist
@@xxxlonewolf49lmfao
@@xxxlonewolf49and actually works
Best comment. 🤣👍
Hi mate, always enjoy your vids so imagine my surprise when below your pic the vid title was shown as " transparent try on haul"!!!!! Hilarious 😁😁😁. I do TRULY hope its a youtube glitch!!!!
Considering Russia can’t even give their soldiers optics I doubt their “stealth” bomber has a 30 ton payload
I think you mean a telescopic sight. or a Scope.
A telescopic sight, commonly called a scope informally, is an optical sighting device based on a refracting telescope.[1] It is equipped with some form of a referencing pattern - known as a reticle - mounted in a focally appropriate position in its optical system to provide an accurate point of aim. Telescopic sights are used with all types of systems that require magnification in addition to reliable visual aiming, as opposed to non-magnifying iron sights, reflector (reflex) sights, holographic sights or laser sights, and are most commonly found on long-barrel firearms, particularly rifles, usually via a scope mount. Similar devices are also found on other platforms such as artillery, tanks and even aircraft.[2][3] The optical components may be combined with optoelectronics to add night vision or smart device features.
and We shouldn't Doubt, you should look into this.
Technical intelligence (TECHINT) is the process of collecting, processing, and sharing information about the weapons and equipment used by other countries' armed forces. TECHINT also includes information about foreign science, technology, and weapon systems. The goal of TECHINT is to: Prevent technological surprises, Assess foreign scientific and technical capabilities, and Develop countermeasures to neutralize an adversary's technological advantages.
@@SansaStarkw I mean an optic. Any optic. Your average Russian infantryman is rocking iron sights like it’s 1990. That’s pathetic
@@michaels5210 nah, everyone who really needs an optic in their everyday job has one. Bought by themselves, it's what their wages are for basically. Imperfect, yet works
@@beibotanov that’s not what any media release says. Media releases by both Ukraine and Russia. Even press releases by the Russian government about the shiny new AK12 show soldiers with AK12’s lacking sights, lasers, lights, or anything.
Is this like the T14? Will it be built in 2000never?
You're mean. At least 7 tanks were built 😂
Too big and too expensive, so they cancelled it
@@426baronThere are at least 130 of them. But series production hasn't been started yet.
@@alexanderbelov6892 tank for the intel.
It is as real as Optimus Prime , little green men and the chinesse stealth bomber
the little green men were real, unfortunately.
Cometh preschool dropout rocket scientists 😂😂😂
Putin needed a new swimming pool so the money went there instead of planes
🧠🦟
If the Tu-160 is the Blackjack does that mean the PAK-DA is a Flapjack?
Why all the Chinese and Russian airplanes look like American clones????
потому что америка в период СССР своровала чертежи у русских сами вы не фига бы не сделали
Russia is a mystery itself, nobody knows what they have & capable of 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺❤❤❤❤
Great content. ...
Probably stated somewhere else already in the comments, but Kasan has 1.4 million inhabitants. Not exactly a small town.
I thought the b21 had up to 7000-9000
That's the first time I've heard of SEAD missions being carried out by slow-flying, highly-visible, easily-targetable, long-range non-stealth bombers.
Easily targeting ?
Russian bombers use long range cruise missiles and ballistic missiles
The kh22/32 range 2000km
The kh101/102 range is 4500km
Kh69 range is 400km
Etc
No air defense system have the range of even 300km imagine 4500km
Also every bomber can carry 12 to 16 missile and thats is enough to destroy any system in the world
@@ali-haider5788 И я полагаю, их тоже никто не видел?
@@ali-haider5788 the F22 exists
@corneliusmcmuffin3256 what the hell does the f22 have to do with what i said
The prototype is so stealthy, they have parked it somewhere, but can't find it anymore...
It's on some Russian general's dacha, in the shape of a well maintained Bentley.
Imo it is quite interesting to see differences between patent drawings and animation, there seem to be few changes making it more efficient subsonic aircraft with less compromised aerodynamics by stealth (winglets and intakes mainly).
It's stealthy that we haven't been able to detect it as it hides in the hangar, where it's permanently grounded.
And now the experts to tell us how it will never be a reality or how supposedly it will be in low numbers.
May I ask what happend to that 750 f22 jets and ended up with 190 or something. I mean the plan for the b21 which isnt even out yet is tohave 200 units produced but lets wait and see if that doesnt become something like 70.
production of modern equipment is hard and takes time. The T-14 is 10 years old yet suffers the same problems your describing, its taken 2 years into Ukraine for Russian industry to kick into second gear and sustained their tank fleet in some limited capacity in this prolonged war. Take into account Tanks have a much lower bar to entry than a stealth fighter, so the fact that the US can produce 190 is impressive, even if it should probably be outputting closer to 750. Russia should be glad America is this inefficient, even now the American air force would wipe the floor, imagine if America gets into a modern war and we learn how to produce at peak efficiency like we did during world war 2?
@@corneliusmcmuffin3256 ,,production of modern equipment is hard and takes time"
Dang I wish most of you guys realised that when the Armata and su57 came out. Though I think you will get it when the russians start to laugh about the 10 pathers, 5 chally 3 and the 20 at best new gen abrams are all that western armies can muster.
It has taken 2 years nope less than a year to start mass producing stuff and start going back to the soviet capabilities. Though if in an all out war, the russians can in a matter of months do that, build back the factories and machines, get the personal and soldier. You know why ? Because they are in full control of their MIC, the west isnt. In russia its a matter of national security, in the west its a business, thats that major difference
The armat wss presented 10 years ago just like the germans presented their new panther which will come into existence in about 10 years from now IF everything goes smoothly, IF !
The armata finished its trials in late 2022, since then there have been rumors for its mass production but nothing concrete, the russians would probably hide the real numbers built for a reason.
They posted 190 over the course of 15 years if the full plan for production was to be realised it would have taken more than 2 trillion dollars and up to 2030 yo 2040 to complete the 750 units.
America would not be able to do anything because the only way for them to utilise most if their airforce is via the bases in europe and their carriers, since the cold war countermeasures for both have been created, from the high tech subs to the carrier killers to the tactical nukes carrier by supersonic missiles.
Remember the cardboard body armor😂
It was propaganda the russians armors proved to be very good now
I remember that being disproven. there was a whole lot of fake shit circulating around the first two weeks or so of the war. Remember when the invasion first started and people were uploading Arma III footage and saying its from ukraine? remember the girls that would livestream a video of air defense on loop from across the globe claiming to be ukrainian for money? im glad all that shit stopped. Anyway my point is anything from those first 15~ days of the war is probably not very factual.
"Planned life span of 12-21 years, depending on use and maintenance" Yeah good luck on maintaining a bomber when you can't even maintain a tank.
How brainwashed are you? 😂😂😂. You probably also believe Russia is waging war with showels
Sorry for the off-topic observation, but what is up with this new trend of adding unneeded "snow" on clips? 3:40
The flying wing design is not as much about the drag deduction as it is about payload to weight ratio. The high payload may be used to carry more weapons or more fuel.
Based on Russia's history of exaggerating the abilities of their weapons (and/or America overestimating them), I'd divide all of these estimates by two. Heck, that wooden mock-up might turn out to be the actual prototype!
how many wooden prototypes of T-50 turned to be actual prototypes of Su-57?
@@worldoftancraft U mean "stelth" bomber with gap in bombbay ....
@@mateuszzimon8216 imagine yourself making final conclusions based on early prototypes. The peak of internet expert thought
@@worldoftancraft as coming form post-communism country, i can tell u if that was "prototype. production is even worse than that
@@mateuszzimon8216 I honestly didn't knew that being from some former communist country is I guess valued more than a Ph.d in some area.
Won't come, as long as the existing Soviet era designs can do the job, too. And when it comes, it always has the risk of being already obsolete and based on a economy that no longer exists.
Russian wonder weapons just like the SU 57 or T-14 Armata
The SU-57 wonder weapons is in production and it has already been used in Ukraine very successfully. Your biases and lack of knowledge are clogging your reasoning.
@@loumcast so stealthy no one has seen it over Ukraine
@@Angl0sax0nknightThe Su-57 is being used in a similar role as the Mig-31. It won't be over Ukraine when it launches a missile.
@@Angl0sax0nknight That's what we are told, reality is different. Just like we were told the Russians were using shovels to fight in this war, demoralized, using old chips from washing machines for their weapons, or that Russia was going to run out of missiles withing six months after the war started. Take what you here on our propagandist US/western media with a grain of salt, probably half of the stuff we are told its BS and fake news.
@@voidtempering8700 If it can't be used over Ukraine, then its stealth sucks.
Where can I place my pre-order?
@6:20 you quote a common misconception of lift that is absolutely absurd: air doesn't magically move faster over the top of the wing to create some sort of vacuum/low pressure effect and that's not how lift works.
The Pak Da sounds like it's the Armata of the air.
Tu160 cruise missiles have a range of 2,500 miles and reach Washington. Russians don’t need an analogue of the B-2
Non western aircraft not being stealthy acording to "experts" is basically a meme at this point. The hoops they will jump thru to reach those conclusions can be quite entertaining.
This comment has way less upvotes than it deserves. Russian way of doing things is "good enough works" instead of "world-class-wunderwaffen".
Western "experts" have been proven wrong time and again since the beginning of the SMO, and they still continue producing bullshit copium. Well, seeing the type of comments and how many upvotes they have, they have their audience, I guess.
Запомните. Вы знаете ровно столько сколько вам позволяют знать!
It looks like the TU2 is mislabeled and mostly off-screen at 1:42 when it is mentioned.
Kazan has about 2 million people...not sure it should be called a " small city"
Was about to say. Kazan is one of the bigger cities in Russia
To all the people who wanna make the "Too stealthy that it disappeared" joke on this marvelous aircraft, remember that the Su-57 became the ("first 5th gen fighter jet to have a kill") in ukraine almost 2 years ago 😏
Yes, and it took down another older Russian made fighter bomber at close range.
Yes, a plane built while Russia wasn't in a war. You think they are building high tech stuff right now?
The first prototype of the PAK DA is almost assembled. But there are problems with electronics and the lack of engines for the bomber. But this is not scary, since the first two prototypes are static and are intended for strength testing. Only when the static prototypes pass this test will assembly of the flight prototypes begin.
It's stealth capabilities are so good it's been hiding the T14 armeta tanks as well.
You should cover the unmanned stealth Iranian fighter jet coming out in August.
WtF! A Pak Da just flew over my house!
>Leak, for once, is not on the War Thunder forum
I spilled my coffee when I heard that & was like... "IMPOSSIBLE" LOL
Its so stealthy that even the developers havent seen it.
You have the best background, I love the skeleton wearing the roman armor - how do I get one of those?
Russia's new stealth bomber is so invisible, even they can't find it.
Was this different than that flying drone that supposedly meant to accompany the Su57?
Love at first sight ❤❤❤
Perfect question to ask!
It's above your sky.... maybe 😂
It's so stealthy that even Tupolev
doesn't know it exists.
It's so stealthy even the production line workers have no idea where it is