I think the Sub is more for those looking for more space while Mazda is for those who want to feel special because of the more upscale interior, and to have a thrilling driving experience.
If you want luxury you go mazda. If you want capability you go subaru. The mazda absolutely hands down has the superior more refined interior. However there is soemthing to say about subarus interior. Its basic. Its easy to use. And most importantly its easy to clean and keep clean. You dont care as much about getting it dirty because you know you can wipe it off. Which is a real plus for someone who cares more about practicality .
no kidding, unless you are actually trying to take people in the back, or do some light offroading from time to time. CX-30 sucks, rather have a CX-5 for a little more money
4:41 Do we use that spinner control with the included Atari games? Night Driver, Breakout, Pong? Their website strangely left out any mention of Atari arcade games.
I had a CX30, now I have a Crosstrek Sport, yes the cx30 has a nicer interior, but I like the CT more. More legroom, ground clearance, and more capable off road. I think the 24’s look better also.
I drive a CX-30 sport atm but am looking at higher trim options and have always had my eye on the Crosstrek. Do you find the back more accommodating for passengers and items (when the seats are down)? Do you miss the infotainment/interior of the CX-30? Looking at long-term ownership options and while I like my CX-30, I'm interested in a bigger gas tank and might need that bit more of [overall] backseat + cargo room the Crosstrek offers
@@pri5044 I had a “loaded” CX30, I miss the auto tailgate, and heads up display was cool. I never really liked the infotainment system. I don’t really miss the nicer interior. The CT feels bigger, and the AWD system is great.
what kind of a review is this? its like you review Apples vs Oranges and in the end you say: They are almost identical, taste them and choose for yourself...
My opinion. Mazda looks ugly on the outside. Subaru just feels right when you get inside. Familiar buttons and everything is so easy to get used to. Easy to drive. Just more practical. I like the outside look much better than Mazda. Subaru is an easy pick for me.
The mazda is considerably more premium feeling, Subaru feels really cheap inside but hey if you prefer safety over style and functionality then go Subaru.
I think the Sub is more for those looking for more space while Mazda is for those who want to feel special because of the more upscale interior, and to have a thrilling driving experience.
Which one drives smoother? I've heard the Mazda drives a bit rougher over bumps and road hazards.
If you want luxury you go mazda. If you want capability you go subaru. The mazda absolutely hands down has the superior more refined interior. However there is soemthing to say about subarus interior. Its basic. Its easy to use. And most importantly its easy to clean and keep clean. You dont care as much about getting it dirty because you know you can wipe it off. Which is a real plus for someone who cares more about practicality .
The seats in the Crosstrek are real leather, not Startex.
Other than that the interior is considerably cheaper feeling on the subaru especially the plastics.
The cx30 woudve looked better with less cladding 😅
The Mazda CX-30 is so much better it’s actually funny
yep...cx 30 doesnt come with a future headgasket replacement lol......or transmission issues..lol old school is always better
@@getrbentracinnewbeginnings4291 new subarus don’t have terrible head gaskets anymore but the subaru just sucks in general
no kidding, unless you are actually trying to take people in the back, or do some light offroading from time to time. CX-30 sucks, rather have a CX-5 for a little more money
@@TheCarHornMasterWhy are they so popular, a lot of people like them.
Limited has leather seats in USA
4:41
Do we use that spinner control with the included Atari games? Night Driver, Breakout, Pong?
Their website strangely left out any mention of Atari arcade games.
I had a CX30, now I have a Crosstrek Sport, yes the cx30 has a nicer interior, but I like the CT more. More legroom, ground clearance, and more capable off road. I think the 24’s look better also.
I drive a CX-30 sport atm but am looking at higher trim options and have always had my eye on the Crosstrek. Do you find the back more accommodating for passengers and items (when the seats are down)? Do you miss the infotainment/interior of the CX-30?
Looking at long-term ownership options and while I like my CX-30, I'm interested in a bigger gas tank and might need that bit more of [overall] backseat + cargo room the Crosstrek offers
@@pri5044 I had a “loaded” CX30, I miss the auto tailgate, and heads up display was cool. I never really liked the infotainment system. I don’t really miss the nicer interior. The CT feels bigger, and the AWD system is great.
what kind of a review is this? its like you review Apples vs Oranges and in the end you say: They are almost identical, taste them and choose for yourself...
CX-30 has 25% more HP than the 😽Crosstrek
lol, it’s not even fair. The CX30 is closer to a BMW fighter and the Subaru looks like something a grandma would drive.
The CX-30 is closer to the Acura RDX than the Subaru Crosstrek lmao.
My opinion. Mazda looks ugly on the outside. Subaru just feels right when you get inside. Familiar buttons and everything is so easy to get used to. Easy to drive. Just more practical. I like the outside look much better than Mazda. Subaru is an easy pick for me.
The mazda is considerably more premium feeling, Subaru feels really cheap inside but hey if you prefer safety over style and functionality then go Subaru.
Mazda has no cvt that a good thing
That Subaru looks 10 years old just sitting on the lot
Moore Mark Brown Karen Jones James
Jackson Nancy Lee Donald Garcia Sarah
Both are cheap, disposable junk, like all other new cars.