Anything on the internet is Freeware, according to Microsoft? Microsoft's own software is available on the internet, so by their logic, all their software is now Freeware. That's very generous of them!
That is hardly what they said. The argument was that anything publicly _accessible_ is freeware. If you need to create an account, some countries can argue that you agree to a ToS. If you buy something then the contract/receipt states exactly what you bought (which nowadays tends to be a limited license that can be unilaterally revoked at any time). But if it is a publicly available video or image, then accessing it is free, and "fair use" applies (you are allowed to view it! Even memorize it! hell, you can even trace it if you wish, or describe it to someone! Some even argue it is allowed to have it show up in a stream where you browse the net, or to include it in a video if some requirements are fulfilled!). This is also why it is legal to download pirate-copies of their software (but not to upload it so others can do so). You never agreed to a ToS regarding the use of that software (but the person who originally acquired it did, and even if they didn't, they infringe a copyright in a way not allowed under fair-use by distributing it further).
@@feha92 Your understanding of the law is terrible lol. Copyright protection laws state that you can not make a COPY of anothers intellectual property without expressed permission to do so, and downloading that software whether pirated or not without that permission is illegal. Terms of service are irrelevant when it comes to copyright law, they are completely separate things. The ONLY exception is with pirated media like music or and movies. If you download it then that is illegal since you are making a copy of it, however It isn't technically illegal to stream them because you aren't making a permanent copy of it, therefore you haven't broken any copyright.
@@TheChemizzle I think you might be talking about a different law than mine. Otherwise your understanding of it is atrocious. copyright laws are about having the right to _distributing_ copies of your work, without unauthorized competition. Not about simply _making_ said copies. It is why when you do own a copy of a work, you can privately copy it as much as you want, and use it however you want. You are only limited in its distribution, and even there there are plenty of carve-outs allowing it for "closed societies" (allowing ie. movie-nights with friends, or reading aloud to your kids, or teachers copying parts of textbooks for their students or playing a movie for the class, or libraries in general, and so on). And you can obviously always sell your copy of the work, but it is then also implied that you need to get rid of all private copies too. And you absolutely can't sell it twice. There is also the whole philosophy about how distributors are the ones enabling everything and the ones that are easiest to go after. While it is near unenforceable to target the recipients. Same reason there is no law against possession or use of drugs, but unlicensed sales are entirely illegal.
You was allowed to do it, just not on the SMS.. (iMessage is a 14 years old thing, when you was able to get the SMS messages on your wifi only iPad..) because if you don't know, iMessage is still use the same method as SMS, and have the same backup system, and sending the message on your contracted phone network if they can't send it as iMessage.. (so if the green buble is not avaliable, the blue buble tell you it sent on the backup method, but it sent..)
If I copy a few things for myself that I didn't pay for then it's called "piracy", but if Microsoft takes petabytes of content from others to regurgitate for profit we call it "fair use". Logically, the problem is I'm not stealing enough.
A company literally spent A LOT of money to create that in HOPE that they would make money on it. You on the other hand, provided it for free for no expectation of compensation
@@CakePrincessCelestiano they're saying it's better if you pirate and torrent because you're paying electricity and ISP bills to make someone else's life better but if you're Microsoft you're doing it to sell other people's stuff back to them through machine laundering
The skip ahead button usually skips the commonly skipped portions of a video, usually sponsor reads. I've had it for months and it's pretty accurate. Edit: Clarity, sorry!
It goes to the section of the video that everyone else is skipping? Seems like a design flaw... Just to clarify, you're saying it goes to the section of the video where the sponsor read is? The section that everyone skips?
@quinndirks5653 when you reach the point where an ad read starts a little pop up shows up that if you click it, you will skip to the portion of the video that other viewers skipped to.
you're absolutely right, but there's the real issue that text on green bubbles are slightly more difficult to read due to the poor contrast between the green and the white from the text. it's definitely a minor inconvenience but that can really be a bit irritating as time goes on. it's basically a quality of life feature. also, the poor contrast is not very accesible to folks with lower vision. of course that wont affect everybody but it should be taken into account by Apple (it won't, sadly)
Then you've never been the one person in the group chat that doesn't have an iPhone. All the features break and iPhone loudly announces that it was your fault. Then everyone believes it because they love Apple.
@@diamonds8014 I probably have been in group chats as the only android user, and you know what? So what? Sod them. I'm not buying an iPhone because of their tech illiteracy.
Kinda just sounds like bad friends at that point. If they get mad at you over something a company does then I question the quality of that friendship. As far as I can tell only very shallow, and self centered elitists tend to actually get mad about the blue vs green bubble thing. Not a single person I’ve ever met has cared in the slightest about it.
Honestly I live in the US and even back in high school I knew many Android users and we had multiple green bubble group chats; nobody really cared. This must be a relatively new thing
its kinda good that way. android has its identity in ios, it will always be in their head hahahh (no but seriously, kinda gotta keep up the tradition, android is green anyways, so why bother changing it)
How much is "yo ass" paying for Netflix, Spotify, Disney + and other streaming services? My ass pays Premium because I use YT more than any other streaming service and YT Music is acceptable. I know we are used to get YT for free, but It's probably the most used service of all for the most of us
Explains that tmobile commercial i heard today that specifically stated "if we raise your rates, we will pay your last month". Basically openly stating "if we are jerks, and you refuse to put up with it, go somewhere else"
So youtube made a button that everyone will use to skip the in-video content creators ad... While they're saying to everyone by premium because you're not allowed to skip our ads but then they offer you a button to skip the other guys ad... Funny how things go isn't it.
RUclips premium pays creators from the money it gets from users. They aren't affected by demonization from that payout. Which is the reason RUclipsrs take sponsorships. Yes its indeed "funny how that works"🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
That's an intelligent way of lowering their revenue, honestly speaking. A few years ago, Linus said that their merchandise and sponsorships account for more than half of their revenue. (It was a wan show many years ago, I might have gotten the details wrong).
@@luisgutierrez8047sure, yeah. Google definitely distributes all revenue to creators! Obviously they don't want to make profit and keep revenue to themselves, who would want that??
@@yensteel ok but i DESPISE getting sponsor segments when i put on a true crime or something in a queue for a car trip. for one thing; i cant really just touch my phone to skip it (because itll be mini player with maps as main display, which means i gotta tap pause on the map or itll attempt to miniplay when i swap to yt, then click big on yt, skip forward, go back to maps, press start again, the flow is a PAIN((all while driving and risking 4 demerits +$1k fine))) this is just one example but it just sucks getting entire minute long unskippable ads basically with yt premium, this IS my netflix sub, i dont sub to netflix so the least i can ask for is no long asf sponsor segments.
@@luisgutierrez8047 you have it right. youtube premium users get ads paid out at a higher rate and are a semi insignificant amount of users overall, if they skipped every sponsor segment then at WORST it would mean you could cut the value of a commission by their viewership %, not the end of the world, if it was a feature for everyone (it already is for ppl using plugins on browser lol) it could be worse but hey, i would love inbuilt support for this to premium
The thing about freedom freedomland is that I've never met a person who uses WhatsApp. Always either SMS or Facebook Messenger. The blue/green bubble thing only matters to high school girls - not trying to be sexist, it just is that way.
8:05 I have a lifetime 50% reduction on my French mobile internet plan and it'd be hard for them to walk back on it, unlike this. In France (and probably other European countries), you can't really alter the deal that easily without allowing people to opt out from the change (for free) one way or another. They could technically sunset the plan and make a new one, but they must make the new one different enough that it doesn't get challenged. They can alter it to the gain of the customer easily though, my carrier upgraded my plan 3 times since I got it (I went from 4G to 5G and have 3x the data), but the price never changed.
RUclips "Jump Ahead".... Kinda feels like "Oh, please jump ahead to avoid this sponsored section of the creator" but at the same time they had this mentality of "Be damned if you use Adblocks!!!"
Back in the day scraping people's content for your own use was known as "Plagiarism", or just flat-out theft. But nowadays all you have to do is slap the words "AI" or "Machine learning" onto the reason why you're taking it. And it's somehow totally fine and, "Making way for the future". Sigh*, Sweet Jesus.
Only works if it's done by the big corps because they have enough money for dispute in the court If the same thing is done by small individuals, it will still get DMCA'd to the ground quickly Very sad reality
It was never plagiarism to use someone else's content for your own personal use. AI is very different from scraping. Please stop being misinformed by Art Channels spreading their stupid propaganda.
You realize that arguably the earliest versions of computers like the Analytical Engine by Charles Babbage was also mechanical. So North Carolina State University has evolved it, just backwards 🤦🤦
I'm in England and I'm never early because it's uploaded around 4am But I'm currently at Glastonbury festival so I am here early for once. Good night Hi @Riley ....mmmm bixby
I'm surprised people haven't caught on yet the RUclips skipped function is literally a AI-powered ad skip. I just used it to skip the message... From your sponsor.
Be nice if RUclips focused on RUclips premium doing what it advertises it does and that’s being Ad Free and block “Sponsor Segments” otherwise known as…Ads 🙄
They've already been shit at it enough that I'll never do it. I'm not giving them money when they've already proven they're not good-faith actors, and I also have the example of Hulu and Netflix and other platforms for what "premium" means and how, soon, it'll be "premium is the entry fee and if you don't want ads it's another 20 bucks "
Picture-in-picture for Shorts were annoying when I first got it. I was so used to closing RUclips Shorts while playing a Short to get away from the brain rot. Got used to it now. I just need to pause them before closing RUclips
Mine is still breaking when switching to PIP Which it's been doing on full videos as well. Where the video has gone to PIP, but the hover window isn't selectable Have to pause the video via the media controls, then reopen the RUclips app. In some cases, I have to go to home, then reopen, twice, before the minimized bar is shown again
Apple has a near monopoly in US mobile devices: Android is about half the market, but that's split among _many_ brands; Apple has about half the market _all to itself,_ & deliberately blocks interoperability with other brands of equipment. They're even more anti-competitive than Microsoft was in the '90s.
1:50 they know where to take you because all the poor peasants, that can't afford RUclips Premium, all skip the sponsorship reads. So RUclips will skip you to the next section that most people watch, like how it shows the volume of views on the timeline, showing you the most played sections.
And... I still don't see the value in the ridiculous price RUclips is charging for ad free. "Should we charge less? Nah! Let's add features that nobody cares about!"
UGH, you could have commented about the final bit, creating a 'plastic cube' without the use of electricity is a lie. It has to use electricity, because a MAGNETIC field is, electric, a person physically pushing it, requires electricity (muscles/nerves).
" *Kirigami is a variation of origami* , the Japanese art of folding paper. In kirigami, the *paper is cut as well* as being folded, *resulting in a three-dimensional design* that stands away from the page. Kirigami typically does not use glue." So _origami remastered_ is not far away from it...
If Apple doesn't want to get rid of "green" bubbles for none iMessage, they should just darken the green bubble to be more like an emerald and leave the light green as an indicator that RCs is not working.
@@B.D.F. RCS isn't SMS it's supposed to be the replacement and if something isn't working, you should be able to tell at a glance. Again I didn't say remove it, I'm saying that it should be kept for SMS and just change the tint for RCS.
@@B.D.F. so does Android. In fact, it does both "desaturates" (this isn't the right word but I'll go with it) and a message tells you it's sending SMS. This isn't telling them to reinvent the wheel but add some redundancy. If a small message goes by and you didn't see it and now you can't send high quality images. You're going to be angry however, if both happen you can tell at a glance.
So you're going to correct the mistakes of an AI, by using an AI that is known for mistakes by it's very programming. That is some weapons grade, "Grade your classmates school work" Level BS.
The youtube skip button will learn that most people skip past the ads, so youtube will be adding a skip the sponsor segment button for in video ads while also shoving in their own ads. LTT will love it
That is a really interesting idea Microsoft had regarding content online being freeware. So by that logic, any pirate video, music, text etc which is uploaded to the internet is therefore now freeware to be used by AI. So as long as the AI doesn't train directly from the actual copyrighted source but does so via an internet pirated option that is fine. So by that logic no music company, film company etc should ever had an issue with their stuff being used in AI now then?
Don't feel bad, Google Fi users. Google Voice doesn't have RCS support either. Apparently, expecting Google to support their own products is too much for them to handle.
The thing is, it is a gray area when sites block crawlers to bypass the robots.txt file. The internet archive does this for example as many sites will block crawlers just so they don't show up in search results. It's not a simple issue you guys kinda missed the mark on that.
Except f### 'em. If you don't want it used, don't show it to the public. Information on the internet is public property whether the law recognizes it yet or not.
I don't want all this stupid garbage in my text conversations (read receipts, really?). All I want is to stop getting stupid 'reaction' messages such as: "Laughed at 'The message I just sent.'" or "Liked 'The message I just sent.'" Simply _disabling_ that stupid crap on the iPhone in SMS messages would have fixed all this years ago.
Shouldn't allowing AI to scrape your content be opt-IN, not opt-OUT? If you create content, someone should have to ask your permission to use it; you shouldn't have to tell them NOT to use it. 🤔
Um, no. If one shows content to the public, one would be a foolish ass to think one has any right to dictate what the public does with it. The law may say otherwise, but reality says that "intellectual property" is a myth.
Apple has been clowned for not having RCS but most carriers around the world doesn't even support it. So for many of us in Europe it's absolutely useless since so few carriers support it. In my case, no carriers support it. Zero.
Ah, yes. I've had plenty of conversations with apple owners who wouldn't believe apple was the problem when messaging between devices. Course, that was always the intent. Right apple?
T-mobile forced you to pay more already because their old plans don't include new technologies. I had to change from older plan couple years ago just to be able to use 5G but technically they didn't increase my rate ffs.
2:31 I can't stop myself from finding the parallel of all this AI companies ignoring the rights of others for "scientific advancement" and Josef Mengele.
1:50 as a premium user in my experience, it skip the sponsorship ads what youtubers themself put in the video. btw i have premium family, so i don't pay for it. :)
Here in the US, armed robots are only legal for use in defending the _occupant(s)_ of a property, not for protecting mere property. Otherwise, they fall under "man trap" felony laws.
The whole "be online to receive, because the network isn't caching messages for you" thing, seems ridiculous. Store-&-forward message relaying is _not_ that resource intensive, if they'd just allow mobile-to-mobile towerless mesh communication. Anything that isn't maximally monetizable, just seems to languish in this service-focused regime?
I don't get it - wouldn't Google Fi just use Google messages which forces RCS by fiat??? Don't matter, cause I'm not switching to Google Messages. I want platform RCS on android just like SMS, and if Google won't do it then why bother, I'll just use something else.
Well the AI people might have a leg to stand on, Google got sued over posting thumbnails for copyright violations, and it was determined it wasn't illegal.
Being mad that content you posted on the internet, got used, is so ridiculous; that would be like getting mad that where you went on public roads, got tracked~ _oh, wait..._
Sadly, the rest of the world is using a centralized app-specific proprietary messaging service, entirely beholden to the whims of a single corporation. Federated messaging is so poorly supported, the US is just getting it when most of the world has _given up_ on having a reasonable communication method.
Wait I had this exact issue 6:11 of bank overcharge but it was for Apple Music and I have never been refunded. It’s been like 4 years and I have evidence. How can I get help
There are no issues with companies training their AI on freely available content online. The issue of copyright has no relevance in this discussion, at least not more so than a child reading a Wikipedia page to prepare theie oral presentation on Saturn.
Yeah, watching the rest of the world _achingly slowly_ catch up to the reality that "intellectual property" is an absurdly impractical (& harmful!) concept, propped up by solipsistic sham justifications, could be satisfying, if it weren't so delayed.
Yeah, no $#¡+. Meanwhile, mesh communications are used in telecom backhaul, hardened multilayer military networks, ultra-dense cities, & 3rd world wastelands, but our always-online pocket supercomputer servers with 1 mile radio range, may only communicate across town _by subscription._ 🤡 This is what services do.
Actually, it's been quite a while since I saw Microsoft put any effort into curtailing illicit usage of their apps. Seems like they're quietly happy to let you use their spyware, instead of something less traceable.
Anything on the internet is Freeware, according to Microsoft? Microsoft's own software is available on the internet, so by their logic, all their software is now Freeware. That's very generous of them!
How dare you use their own logic against them ?
And that's how you boost 4chan's god complex right there
That is hardly what they said. The argument was that anything publicly _accessible_ is freeware.
If you need to create an account, some countries can argue that you agree to a ToS.
If you buy something then the contract/receipt states exactly what you bought (which nowadays tends to be a limited license that can be unilaterally revoked at any time).
But if it is a publicly available video or image, then accessing it is free, and "fair use" applies (you are allowed to view it! Even memorize it! hell, you can even trace it if you wish, or describe it to someone! Some even argue it is allowed to have it show up in a stream where you browse the net, or to include it in a video if some requirements are fulfilled!).
This is also why it is legal to download pirate-copies of their software (but not to upload it so others can do so). You never agreed to a ToS regarding the use of that software (but the person who originally acquired it did, and even if they didn't, they infringe a copyright in a way not allowed under fair-use by distributing it further).
@@feha92 Your understanding of the law is terrible lol. Copyright protection laws state that you can not make a COPY of anothers intellectual property without expressed permission to do so, and downloading that software whether pirated or not without that permission is illegal. Terms of service are irrelevant when it comes to copyright law, they are completely separate things. The ONLY exception is with pirated media like music or and movies. If you download it then that is illegal since you are making a copy of it, however It isn't technically illegal to stream them because you aren't making a permanent copy of it, therefore you haven't broken any copyright.
@@TheChemizzle I think you might be talking about a different law than mine. Otherwise your understanding of it is atrocious.
copyright laws are about having the right to _distributing_ copies of your work, without unauthorized competition. Not about simply _making_ said copies.
It is why when you do own a copy of a work, you can privately copy it as much as you want, and use it however you want. You are only limited in its distribution, and even there there are plenty of carve-outs allowing it for "closed societies" (allowing ie. movie-nights with friends, or reading aloud to your kids, or teachers copying parts of textbooks for their students or playing a movie for the class, or libraries in general, and so on). And you can obviously always sell your copy of the work, but it is then also implied that you need to get rid of all private copies too. And you absolutely can't sell it twice.
There is also the whole philosophy about how distributors are the ones enabling everything and the ones that are easiest to go after. While it is near unenforceable to target the recipients. Same reason there is no law against possession or use of drugs, but unlicensed sales are entirely illegal.
How very gracious of our corporate overlords to finally allow us the use of high quality images between iOS and Android devices
You was allowed to do it, just not on the SMS.. (iMessage is a 14 years old thing, when you was able to get the SMS messages on your wifi only iPad..) because if you don't know, iMessage is still use the same method as SMS, and have the same backup system, and sending the message on your contracted phone network if they can't send it as iMessage.. (so if the green buble is not avaliable, the blue buble tell you it sent on the backup method, but it sent..)
I mean, it's a problem only in US. Rest of the world uses different, platform agnostic messengers.
Yup. For example, in Poland virtually everyone uses Facebook Messenger as their main messaging app.
But is beta 😂
You already are allowed. Simply require them to get another messaging app like signal.
If I copy a few things for myself that I didn't pay for then it's called "piracy", but if Microsoft takes petabytes of content from others to regurgitate for profit we call it "fair use". Logically, the problem is I'm not stealing enough.
A company literally spent A LOT of money to create that in HOPE that they would make money on it. You on the other hand, provided it for free for no expectation of compensation
@@luisgutierrez8047 So you're saying it's fine as long as you're spending a acrapton of money on the act?
@@CakePrincessCelestiano they're saying it's better if you pirate and torrent because you're paying electricity and ISP bills to make someone else's life better but if you're Microsoft you're doing it to sell other people's stuff back to them through machine laundering
@@CakePrincessCelestiayes, ask the us army and medical insurance.
@@CakePrincessCelestia It's some dumb-ass logic that actually works for some idiots, let them be happy with their corporate rapping.
"... but I won't because I told myself no!"
Truly epic. Well done.
That was way too good
One of the cleverest jokes they've made on this show.
.
That was an *unreasonably* good joke
Kirigami is essentially the same as Origami but cutting (and gluing) the paper is allowed. The kiri in kirigami means to cut, while ori means to fold.
Helpful! 👍
Arigato Sensei
I just know it as the KDE framework lmao
a n i m e
n
i
m
e
@@KokoroKatsura whoa, what happened with you
The ONLY shorts related feature I want in the RUclips app is to completely disable them.
I feel seen.
revanced is good for android
Wow that's such a great tweet at 1:12 I bet the person who tweeted that is so cool and smart and modest
Haha what a coincidence
lol
The skip ahead button usually skips the commonly skipped portions of a video, usually sponsor reads. I've had it for months and it's pretty accurate.
Edit: Clarity, sorry!
It goes to the section of the video that everyone else is skipping? Seems like a design flaw... Just to clarify, you're saying it goes to the section of the video where the sponsor read is? The section that everyone skips?
@@quinndirks5653No, it skips past them, where most people skip to.
I think they're saying it goes to the most *replayed* section, which is generally (okay, universally) right after the ad read. @@quinndirks5653
@@quinndirks5653no, it skips it when the sponsor comes up
@quinndirks5653 when you reach the point where an ad read starts a little pop up shows up that if you click it, you will skip to the portion of the video that other viewers skipped to.
"Green bubbles, Arise!" Would've been epic
We sms at dawn!!!
Only the ppl who watched that Anime get it! And it's a great Anime by the way
@@sg1aprophis the manhwa is far greater than anime as well
arise, chicken.
You mean "Arise! Ye Green bubbles"
"It's how all the big LLMs are trained".
Don't really see how "oh they're all criminals so it's ok" is a great defense.
It's been working for the two-party political duopoly, so far
I still have no earthly idea why I'm supposed to remotely give a shit about the color of my text bubble. Much less on someone else's device.
you're absolutely right, but there's the real issue that text on green bubbles are slightly more difficult to read due to the poor contrast between the green and the white from the text. it's definitely a minor inconvenience but that can really be a bit irritating as time goes on. it's basically a quality of life feature.
also, the poor contrast is not very accesible to folks with lower vision. of course that wont affect everybody but it should be taken into account by Apple (it won't, sadly)
Then you've never been the one person in the group chat that doesn't have an iPhone.
All the features break and iPhone loudly announces that it was your fault. Then everyone believes it because they love Apple.
@@diamonds8014 I probably have been in group chats as the only android user, and you know what? So what? Sod them. I'm not buying an iPhone because of their tech illiteracy.
Kinda just sounds like bad friends at that point. If they get mad at you over something a company does then I question the quality of that friendship.
As far as I can tell only very shallow, and self centered elitists tend to actually get mad about the blue vs green bubble thing. Not a single person I’ve ever met has cared in the slightest about it.
Honestly I live in the US and even back in high school I knew many Android users and we had multiple green bubble group chats; nobody really cared. This must be a relatively new thing
why did anyone seriously expect Apple implementing RCS to end green bubbles? It's Apple's main marketing strategy.
Because if you didn't check WWDC 24, there's RCS support at the end of the IOS segment. (In the board)
What apple being lazy and terrible, and fans keep eating it up.😧
"Surprised Pikachu" 😯"well not surprised actually"😑
@@charlesdoesmore5488 RCS has NEVER meant ending green bubbles
@@Mirtual yes. They just mention RCS support.
its kinda good that way. android has its identity in ios, it will always be in their head hahahh (no but seriously, kinda gotta keep up the tradition, android is green anyways, so why bother changing it)
How cool that Technews can leave you happy and giggly after consuming it. Thank you team.
Anytime it's Riley. It’s gonna be a great tech news time💯💪
Meat riding is a thankless profession
Keep simpin’
I called this guy a dork for this comment and he reported it. 😂 🤡
Anytime it's TechLinked time, its gonna be a good TechLinked Time 😎
All I heard was: HAWK TUAH!!!
If RUclips had a 5$ CAD plan, I would pay. That’s my limit. My ass is not paying 20$ a month on goddang RUclips.
Broke 🍑
@@luisgutierrez8047 thank you for your contribution to the Internet 👍
I'm paying around $6 as a DBA student :p
@@luisgutierrez8047love that cable TV boot huh
How much is "yo ass" paying for Netflix, Spotify, Disney + and other streaming services?
My ass pays Premium because I use YT more than any other streaming service and YT Music is acceptable.
I know we are used to get YT for free, but It's probably the most used service of all for the most of us
Explains that tmobile commercial i heard today that specifically stated "if we raise your rates, we will pay your last month". Basically openly stating "if we are jerks, and you refuse to put up with it, go somewhere else"
So youtube made a button that everyone will use to skip the in-video content creators ad...
While they're saying to everyone by premium because you're not allowed to skip our ads but then they offer you a button to skip the other guys ad... Funny how things go isn't it.
RUclips premium pays creators from the money it gets from users. They aren't affected by demonization from that payout. Which is the reason RUclipsrs take sponsorships. Yes its indeed "funny how that works"🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
That's an intelligent way of lowering their revenue, honestly speaking. A few years ago, Linus said that their merchandise and sponsorships account for more than half of their revenue. (It was a wan show many years ago, I might have gotten the details wrong).
@@luisgutierrez8047sure, yeah. Google definitely distributes all revenue to creators! Obviously they don't want to make profit and keep revenue to themselves, who would want that??
@@yensteel ok but i DESPISE getting sponsor segments when i put on a true crime or something in a queue for a car trip. for one thing; i cant really just touch my phone to skip it (because itll be mini player with maps as main display, which means i gotta tap pause on the map or itll attempt to miniplay when i swap to yt, then click big on yt, skip forward, go back to maps, press start again, the flow is a PAIN((all while driving and risking 4 demerits +$1k fine))) this is just one example but it just sucks getting entire minute long unskippable ads basically with yt premium, this IS my netflix sub, i dont sub to netflix so the least i can ask for is no long asf sponsor segments.
@@luisgutierrez8047 you have it right. youtube premium users get ads paid out at a higher rate and are a semi insignificant amount of users overall, if they skipped every sponsor segment then at WORST it would mean you could cut the value of a commission by their viewership %, not the end of the world, if it was a feature for everyone (it already is for ppl using plugins on browser lol) it could be worse but hey, i would love inbuilt support for this to premium
Fun fact, copyright cases like these take, on average, over a decade to "work their way through the court system."
Meaning most of the scamming has already happened and tech/whatever industry has already moved on.
the copyright system is broken.
Only for these major companies. Ive made a personal claim through instagram that was swift and effective.
They dont want anyone stealing but them
@@averagebard I'm talking about major disputes over the interpretation of the law, not take down requests.
6:26 i wasnt expecting Riley to drop a Blade runner joke lmfao
within cells, interlinked
dreadfully distinct
I'm glad someone else recognized it. Loved it.
the green bubble is such a non issue outside of freedomland
Gotta love WhatsApp
I've never met a person who cares lmao
😂 "freedomland" for now on I'll use it.
The thing about freedom freedomland is that I've never met a person who uses WhatsApp. Always either SMS or Facebook Messenger. The blue/green bubble thing only matters to high school girls - not trying to be sexist, it just is that way.
@@rightwingsafetysquad9872 in other words, nobody gives a shit other than the US, and only the US
I love being European
8:05 I have a lifetime 50% reduction on my French mobile internet plan and it'd be hard for them to walk back on it, unlike this. In France (and probably other European countries), you can't really alter the deal that easily without allowing people to opt out from the change (for free) one way or another. They could technically sunset the plan and make a new one, but they must make the new one different enough that it doesn't get challenged.
They can alter it to the gain of the customer easily though, my carrier upgraded my plan 3 times since I got it (I went from 4G to 5G and have 3x the data), but the price never changed.
usually the skip just skips a built in sponsor ad. which is definitely an... interesting decision for youtube to make.
I mean the meat of Premium is paying to remove ads already, so this just feels like an extension of that
Can we now pirate freely by saying we are training an LLM? I think so.
"Piracy legal" "always has been" 🖥🗿👈🤖
It would be hilarious if high courts decided copyright infringement is legal if you're training an LLM, people would totally use that for piracy.
RUclips "Jump Ahead".... Kinda feels like "Oh, please jump ahead to avoid this sponsored section of the creator" but at the same time they had this mentality of "Be damned if you use Adblocks!!!"
No but, to be fair, premium users _are_ paying RUclips, so they dont actually mind if you don't see ads - cause you don't see theirs anyway.
Needs more Tim Cook impression. 😂
RUclips jump ahead section in this Techlinked was the best. Didn't stop laughing 😂
Back in the day scraping people's content for your own use was known as "Plagiarism", or just flat-out theft.
But nowadays all you have to do is slap the words "AI" or "Machine learning" onto the reason why you're taking it. And it's somehow totally fine and, "Making way for the future".
Sigh*, Sweet Jesus.
Only works if it's done by the big corps because they have enough money for dispute in the court
If the same thing is done by small individuals, it will still get DMCA'd to the ground quickly
Very sad reality
Or also "copyright infringement" in some cases.
Imagine scraping from Nintendo.
It was never plagiarism to use someone else's content for your own personal use.
AI is very different from scraping.
Please stop being misinformed by Art Channels spreading their stupid propaganda.
Also, his entire basis for it being fair use is essentially, "its on the internet so its mine too"
Learning from something is not plagiarism. This applies whether the learner is a human or a machine.
You realize that arguably the earliest versions of computers like the Analytical Engine by Charles Babbage was also mechanical. So North Carolina State University has evolved it, just backwards 🤦🤦
*A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer* has entered the chat
Ain’t no palm pilot ever had no camera dawg. You’d need a palm treo FO dat wizzard.
That T-Mobile Sidekick joke was genius
I've never thought my country, Hungary, will ever get into TechLinked lol
HUNGARY MENTIONED 🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺
I'm in England and I'm never early because it's uploaded around 4am
But I'm currently at Glastonbury festival so I am here early for once.
Good night
Hi @Riley
....mmmm bixby
are you having a lot of fun?
It's like 9:15 am here
Hoping you have a great time
@@colddogs it's ace
Mmm bixby
It's the Apple Messages app, not iMessage that's finally implementing RCS support.
I'm surprised people haven't caught on yet the RUclips skipped function is literally a AI-powered ad skip. I just used it to skip the message... From your sponsor.
Be nice if RUclips focused on RUclips premium doing what it advertises it does and that’s being Ad Free and block “Sponsor Segments” otherwise known as…Ads 🙄
They've already been shit at it enough that I'll never do it. I'm not giving them money when they've already proven they're not good-faith actors, and I also have the example of Hulu and Netflix and other platforms for what "premium" means and how, soon, it'll be "premium is the entry fee and if you don't want ads it's another 20 bucks "
that skip option what they are going to give is that, so you can skip the “Sponsor Segments” with that.
I liked the Sponsor Spot this time! You actually combined it with news.
Picture-in-picture for Shorts were annoying when I first got it. I was so used to closing RUclips Shorts while playing a Short to get away from the brain rot. Got used to it now. I just need to pause them before closing RUclips
Same
Mine is still breaking when switching to PIP
Which it's been doing on full videos as well. Where the video has gone to PIP, but the hover window isn't selectable
Have to pause the video via the media controls, then reopen the RUclips app. In some cases, I have to go to home, then reopen, twice, before the minimized bar is shown again
RUclips is buster since sometimes i get picture in picture mode for normal youtube. Bit it never happens when o wabt ot to
6:26 Within cells, interlinked
1:04 this is why I have trouble understanding why people are saying iOS is a monopoly while saying most people are using Android.
Who said iOS is a monopoly?
@@exiledfrommyself At least, I heard from both LTT and MKBHD
Apple has a near monopoly in US mobile devices: Android is about half the market, but that's split among _many_ brands; Apple has about half the market _all to itself,_ & deliberately blocks interoperability with other brands of equipment. They're even more anti-competitive than Microsoft was in the '90s.
Google Voice users on iOS: still no RCS, just regular SMS
In fairness, Google voice just doesn't support rcs at all
What fairness, is there in that, exactly?
I scrolled down specifically to make sure someone mentioned the pathetic lack of RCS support in Google Voice.
Yet Google's own Google Voice STILL does not support RCS. Thanks Google!!!!!
*10¹⁰⁰% this*
5 seconds into the Apple news, I am still trying to figure out what the discussion about the green bubbles really mean
Oh, so the internet is "free ware" good to know, good to know. Hey Google, what's your thoughts on me using adblock?
So, I can tap a button and have RUclips skip 5 seconds, or I can pay money and tap a button to have RUclips skip 10 seconds? Sounds like a great deal!
1:23 It was a first-class acting :)
1:50 they know where to take you because all the poor peasants, that can't afford RUclips Premium, all skip the sponsorship reads. So RUclips will skip you to the next section that most people watch, like how it shows the volume of views on the timeline, showing you the most played sections.
And... I still don't see the value in the ridiculous price RUclips is charging for ad free.
"Should we charge less? Nah! Let's add features that nobody cares about!"
lol, so many want the option to skip the “Sponsor Segments”, there are many addons for it too.
I'm no longer pouting, because Rileys back!
Sponsor block already has a highlight for important parts of the video, and it’s completely free! Plus all the other benefits, of course.
"There aren't nearly enough people here peeing in bottles.You need to do something about it". Yes I will be borrowing this under 'fair use'.
UGH, you could have commented about the final bit, creating a 'plastic cube' without the use of electricity is a lie. It has to use electricity, because a MAGNETIC field is, electric, a person physically pushing it, requires electricity (muscles/nerves).
" *Kirigami is a variation of origami* , the Japanese art of folding paper. In kirigami, the *paper is cut as well* as being folded, *resulting in a three-dimensional design* that stands away from the page. Kirigami typically does not use glue."
So _origami remastered_ is not far away from it...
If Apple doesn't want to get rid of "green" bubbles for none iMessage, they should just darken the green bubble to be more like an emerald and leave the light green as an indicator that RCs is not working.
They've been using that green for SMS since launch, why reinvent the wheel?
@@B.D.F. RCS isn't SMS it's supposed to be the replacement and if something isn't working, you should be able to tell at a glance. Again I didn't say remove it, I'm saying that it should be kept for SMS and just change the tint for RCS.
@@jQuse They have a text indicator when RCS is being used.
@@B.D.F. so does Android. In fact, it does both "desaturates" (this isn't the right word but I'll go with it) and a message tells you it's sending SMS.
This isn't telling them to reinvent the wheel but add some redundancy.
If a small message goes by and you didn't see it and now you can't send high quality images. You're going to be angry however, if both happen you can tell at a glance.
Yipee, hungary mentioned 🎉🎉(I thankfully didn’t get charged)
So you're going to correct the mistakes of an AI, by using an AI that is known for mistakes by it's very programming.
That is some weapons grade, "Grade your classmates school work" Level BS.
Grazie per il fantastico video! 🇨🇭
Haven’t watched the video yet but I appreciate the effort put into the messages in the thumbnail 😂
I wish RUclips would put back being able to tap on the progress bar on videos to leap ahead that was so nice and easy to use
The fact that some android phones still didn’t have RCS is hilarious people made such an issue over iPhones not having it 💀
The youtube skip button will learn that most people skip past the ads, so youtube will be adding a skip the sponsor segment button for in video ads while also shoving in their own ads. LTT will love it
RUclips _has_ *_ads?_*
So in other words they haven’t listened at all and are still making us pay extra for music when we just want no ads.
RUclips web interface
+ ad-blocking
= 0 ads
That is a really interesting idea Microsoft had regarding content online being freeware. So by that logic, any pirate video, music, text etc which is uploaded to the internet is therefore now freeware to be used by AI. So as long as the AI doesn't train directly from the actual copyrighted source but does so via an internet pirated option that is fine. So by that logic no music company, film company etc should ever had an issue with their stuff being used in AI now then?
Piece by piece, the logical fallacies foundational to "intellectual property", fall apart in practice
Tim Cook has been COOKED...
BOOM!
Don't feel bad, Google Fi users. Google Voice doesn't have RCS support either.
Apparently, expecting Google to support their own products is too much for them to handle.
Another day and an apple innovation which is just them catching up Android
It’s not innovation stop calling it that. Not even apple calls it that.
Gotta love the MSFT AI CEO making that asinine argument, like dawg we can all say the same for your stuff as well if you want to play that game 🏴☠
The thing is, it is a gray area when sites block crawlers to bypass the robots.txt file. The internet archive does this for example as many sites will block crawlers just so they don't show up in search results. It's not a simple issue you guys kinda missed the mark on that.
Except f### 'em. If you don't want it used, don't show it to the public. Information on the internet is public property whether the law recognizes it yet or not.
I don't want all this stupid garbage in my text conversations (read receipts, really?). All I want is to stop getting stupid 'reaction' messages such as: "Laughed at 'The message I just sent.'" or "Liked 'The message I just sent.'" Simply _disabling_ that stupid crap on the iPhone in SMS messages would have fixed all this years ago.
"The internet is freeware"
That's great. Just downloaded Office for free with serial. 😂
Microsoft certainly doesn't mind.
They've turned a blind eye to illicit use of their spyware, for decades. I wonder why?
I don't see many use SMS or RCS for groups lol like who would though?
Shouldn't allowing AI to scrape your content be opt-IN, not opt-OUT?
If you create content, someone should have to ask your permission to use it; you shouldn't have to tell them NOT to use it. 🤔
Um, no. If one shows content to the public, one would be a foolish ass to think one has any right to dictate what the public does with it.
The law may say otherwise, but reality says that "intellectual property" is a myth.
Apple has been clowned for not having RCS but most carriers around the world doesn't even support it. So for many of us in Europe it's absolutely useless since so few carriers support it. In my case, no carriers support it. Zero.
RUclips adding features that revanced already has
Ah, yes.
I've had plenty of conversations with apple owners who wouldn't believe apple was the problem when messaging between devices.
Course, that was always the intent. Right apple?
T-mobile forced you to pay more already because their old plans don't include new technologies. I had to change from older plan couple years ago just to be able to use 5G but technically they didn't increase my rate ffs.
1:30 the enshitification, gets more enshitificationy
I have an android because I'm not a tech rube.
2:31 I can't stop myself from finding the parallel of all this AI companies ignoring the rights of others for "scientific advancement" and Josef Mengele.
“The RUclips app also now supports viewing shorts in picture-in-picture mode for Subway Surfers fans”
💀
Lol I've been in a group chat with for 2 people for 3 years now lol they both have iPhones and I don't think we care that deep but this is welcome
Christ man, i cant believe how good this host is. 100% standup material. He would be a damn star if he committed. Incredibly funny and charming.
1:50 as a premium user in my experience, it skip the sponsorship ads what youtubers themself put in the video.
btw i have premium family, so i don't pay for it. :)
8:50 BTW, Israel is currently using quadcopters with guns, so might want to be careful about joking about robot dogs with guns.
Here in the US, armed robots are only legal for use in defending the _occupant(s)_ of a property, not for protecting mere property. Otherwise, they fall under "man trap" felony laws.
WHat a Joke, its taken this long for Apple devices to finally be able to perform simple tasks like messaging other phones
This was very entertaining, you don't need a background person speaking
I loved my Palm Pilots and Pocket PCs, the iPaq is where I got my name (Birthday present as a kid and needed a runescape username)
My Treo had truly useful features no phone has had since.
Palm was the OG "smartphone".
considering how broken RCS is, not sure if this will be a good thing. So annoying to not get messages from random people at seemingly random times.
The whole "be online to receive, because the network isn't caching messages for you" thing, seems ridiculous. Store-&-forward message relaying is _not_ that resource intensive, if they'd just allow mobile-to-mobile towerless mesh communication. Anything that isn't maximally monetizable, just seems to languish in this service-focused regime?
I don't get it - wouldn't Google Fi just use Google messages which forces RCS by fiat??? Don't matter, cause I'm not switching to Google Messages. I want platform RCS on android just like SMS, and if Google won't do it then why bother, I'll just use something else.
Indeed, I'll use RCS when its supported on Google Voice numbers. Not before.
A solution to a problem intentionally created, that didn't need to exist, that Apple shills call a feature
The jump ahead button has been super useful for me so far. I skip around a lot during videos.
Well the AI people might have a leg to stand on, Google got sued over posting thumbnails for copyright violations, and it was determined it wasn't illegal.
Being mad that content you posted on the internet, got used, is so ridiculous; that would be like getting mad that where you went on public roads, got tracked~ _oh, wait..._
The blue bubbles are for iMessages only. SMS and RCS and everything else is green.
Unfortunately RCS does not always work.
Why do the bubbles need to be the same color if they're equal in quality and function?
I still have never met a person who uses iMessage, like, this is not a thing outside USians with deficiencies is it?
Sadly, the rest of the world is using a centralized app-specific proprietary messaging service, entirely beholden to the whims of a single corporation. Federated messaging is so poorly supported, the US is just getting it when most of the world has _given up_ on having a reasonable communication method.
Wait I had this exact issue 6:11 of bank overcharge but it was for Apple Music and I have never been refunded. It’s been like 4 years and I have evidence. How can I get help
Be a corporation?
There are no issues with companies training their AI on freely available content online. The issue of copyright has no relevance in this discussion, at least not more so than a child reading a Wikipedia page to prepare theie oral presentation on Saturn.
Yeah, watching the rest of the world _achingly slowly_ catch up to the reality that "intellectual property" is an absurdly impractical (& harmful!) concept, propped up by solipsistic sham justifications, could be satisfying, if it weren't so delayed.
When its 2024 and your biggest feature drop is being able to send messages to other people with phones.
Yeah, no $#¡+.
Meanwhile, mesh communications are used in telecom backhaul, hardened multilayer military networks, ultra-dense cities, & 3rd world wastelands, but our always-online pocket supercomputer servers with 1 mile radio range, may only communicate across town _by subscription._ 🤡
This is what services do.
What shirt is he wearing?
Can we also say Windows, Microsoft Office and others are "freeware" too? Or they don't want people piraring their work while they do with others?
Actually, it's been quite a while since I saw Microsoft put any effort into curtailing illicit usage of their apps. Seems like they're quietly happy to let you use their spyware, instead of something less traceable.