Giving My Guest a Science Lesson
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 фев 2025
- MERCH!!! planetpeterson...
Buy my book here! store.bookbaby...
Support me on Patreon / planetpeterson
Science Videos for Teachers and Students: www.teacherspa...
Join Discord: / discord
Check out my podcast rss.com/podcas... or open.spotify.c...
Support me on Venmo: account.venmo....
Be sure to follow me on social media!
Instagram: / planetpeterson
TikTok: @planet_peterson
Want to send me something? PO Box 212 Visalia CA, 93279 (if using FedEx or UPS send to 111 W Acequia Ave, #212 Visalia CA, 93291)
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Animals have gestures and react with specific noises to specific situations. So it's reasonable to speculate that language evolved pretty early in the human lineage.
I was completely with you. Totally confused when this guy started claiming most people thought the Earth was flat.
Biblical literalists require evolution to be false and the world to be flat according to their beliefs.
This guys just saying “well science can’t explain literally everything, so it’s magic”
That's always been Christianity in a nutshell
. 🧐 ? Is it tho?
How?
Was it not the belief that nature operated according to design that 1st led Europeans to research and investigate nature in order to learn the mechanisms and operations of that design?
Was that not what motivated the church to invest so heavily in the development of scientific research and discovery?
The evidence really speaks for itsrlf, in how historicaly we see christendom consistently was typically decades, if not centuries ahead of their contemporaries around the globe in terms of scientific advancement and technological progress.
What evidence “speaks for itself”?
@@biekgiek historical.
@biekgiek huh, it seems the comment that my original comment was responding to has apoearantly been taken down.
Weird. I can't imagine why. But it was to the effect of christianity being a hindrance to scientific progress.
But...
Historically we consistently see christendom was typically decades, if not centuries ahead of their contemporaries around the globe in terms of scientific advancement and technological progress, so the evidence actualy demonstrates the opposite to be true. 🤷
I don't understand why everyone says "common descent" when it's actually about common ANCESTRY. The term "common descent" is nonsensical. I'm a 30+ year genealogist AND an experienced fossil hunter.
Good point! 👌
It IS common descent... From a shared ancestor.
"common descent" (it even has a wikipedia article) is just a different way of looking at the tree. Common ancestry essentially looks at the current species and looking back in time to find the common ancestor. Common descent is looking at a past species and how it spread and split into multiple descendant species. The same thing in the end.
We are descended from our ancestors. This isn't tricky.
"For me, it was Tuesday."
Gawd is less than useless as any answer because it prevents us from finding the real answer.
Not historically it hasnt.
The evidence for that speaks for itsrlf in how christendom consistently was typically decades, if not centuries ahead of their contemporaries around the globe in terms of scientific advancement and technological development.
Good talk until the Flat Earth was brought up. Came out of nowhere.
If evolution is not true, please explain to me why all monkeys go to hell.
Wholesome. :)
Howdy
Who or what created god then, if everything is/was created?
Special Pleading ;)
First😎
Like, has a platypus ever gave birth to a human?
Thanks for springing the trap.
The cheese was great!
I think you're wrong about there being something that would be classified as a monkey in our evolutionary lineage. I can't find anything saying that online. It was only ever apes and before that not apes or monkeys or primates.
Monkeys evolved first. So we're monkeys.
Google primate evolution. Monkeys and apes share a common primate ancestor probably about 25 million years ago.
Aron Ra did a video a couple of years ago that suggested we did have "monkeys" in our ancestry
@@cygnustsp Because we are monkeys. Apes evolved from monkeys. Not sure why my other comment is hidden from me.
Humans didn't evolve into existence.
So, you didn’t come from your parents, because you aren’t an exact clone of them?
Or are you saying you think the species homo habilis (or whatever undiscovered species was our most recent common ancestor with them) popped into existence 2.8 million years ago, and we are one of the surviving lineages from them?
One of the most complete Homo habilis fossils found is KNM-ER 1813. It has a cranial capacity of only 510 cubic centimeters, well below the 600 cubic centimeter cutoff that had been in place since the creation of the Homo habilis species name.
So it seems that this is just some kind of extinct ape. It is not a human ancestor.
No, we're magic mudmen, of course!🤡
It was magic but it probably wasn't mud.
@@vesuvandoppelganger ohhh you’re a troll. Cool.