Sigma 17mm F4 DG DN Review w/ Panasonic S9 [ L-mount ]

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 31

  • @TheHybridShooter
    @TheHybridShooter  4 месяца назад +2

    Big thanks to sigma-foto.cz for lending me the review unit for this video.
    Panasonic S9 Review - Good Decisions [ Lumix S9 ] - ruclips.net/video/jYmM3yidfZg/видео.html

  • @walrusgumboot
    @walrusgumboot 4 месяца назад +7

    The 17mm f4 has been tempting for me, but I think I’ll wait to see the 18-40mm that’s coming.

  • @bitronicc1887
    @bitronicc1887 4 месяца назад +9

    Great review, as always. Thanks, William!

  • @chcomes
    @chcomes 4 месяца назад +3

    if i had not the 18 1.8, this would be a great option. We need those samyang flat primes stat!

  • @AndreiDimaReviews
    @AndreiDimaReviews 4 месяца назад +1

    I want this for my Nikon ZF😎

  •  4 месяца назад +2

    Hello, when can we expect a review of the GH7 ? did Panasonic provide you a review unit ? love your videos 👌

    • @TheHybridShooter
      @TheHybridShooter  4 месяца назад +1

      Thank you! Unfortunately, I don’t have a review unit, so the review is currently not on the schedule.

  • @albedo0point39
    @albedo0point39 4 месяца назад +1

    Do you find yourself using the handheld pixel shift mode much with this?

    • @TheHybridShooter
      @TheHybridShooter  4 месяца назад +1

      I use pixel-shift more for less than 1% of pictures.

  • @chcomes
    @chcomes 4 месяца назад

    I am funny enough liking to grab the s9 without the grip better than with it! at least with the 1.8 primes.

  • @balboa0621
    @balboa0621 4 месяца назад +2

    Are you sure its fullly westher sealed? Im inder the impression that this entire line only has a gasket at the mount but none through the barrel.

    • @Cthames123
      @Cthames123 4 месяца назад

      That's what I thought as well. Does this one, 17mm, break from the design?

  • @bijosn
    @bijosn 4 месяца назад

    Wish they made this for fuji...it could be a good alternative to the fuji 18mm f2

    • @sandradee4331
      @sandradee4331 4 месяца назад

      This is full frame lens, it will never be released for Fuji APS-C.

    • @DavidMBanes
      @DavidMBanes 4 месяца назад

      fuji 18mm f2 is in fact 27mm equiv.

    • @bijosn
      @bijosn 4 месяца назад

      @@sandradee4331 yes i am aware this is a full frame lens, on an apsc it would be a 26mm equivalent.
      But i guess it doesn't make much sense for Sigma to do that

  • @sclogse1
    @sclogse1 4 месяца назад +1

    What did Sinatra say...... "I'm broke, that's ok."

  • @JoATTech
    @JoATTech 4 месяца назад +8

    Waiting for Samyang 24mm F2.8 and 35mm F2.8 to hit L-mount. Then maybe S9 will make sense.

    • @TheHybridShooter
      @TheHybridShooter  4 месяца назад +17

      It already does.

    • @aronaldharper543
      @aronaldharper543 4 месяца назад +3

      The 35 Sigma contemporary is more than doable, as is the 45mm, which is perfect

    • @TheHybridShooter
      @TheHybridShooter  4 месяца назад +4

      @@aronaldharper543Yes, the whole "no small lenses" argument is greatly exaggerated, even Panasonic's F1.8 primes or 20-60 kit lens are completely fine on the S9.

    • @aronaldharper543
      @aronaldharper543 4 месяца назад

      People don't talk enough about the seamless communication between app and camera. It's a game changer. Also, the crop zoom is bonkers. 40mm prime can zoom in to 140mm. You don't see a horribly degraded image. With a high megapixel camera it's just a wow factor. My 70-200 is getting *gulp* 70-620. Why aren't we talking about this?

    • @TheHybridShooter
      @TheHybridShooter  4 месяца назад

      @@aronaldharper543 There is a lot of videos about the app.
      Crop zoom is basically the same thing as clear image zoom which has been available on Sony since 2016, so I don't find it particularly interesting in 2024.
      IQ degradation is directly proportional to the crop factor.

  • @aleksandr8809
    @aleksandr8809 4 месяца назад

    0:58 f-number has exactly same low light performance on full frame, crop, m4/3 and every other sensor

    • @TheHybridShooter
      @TheHybridShooter  4 месяца назад +3

      @@aleksandr8809 Obviously not.

    • @aleksandr8809
      @aleksandr8809 4 месяца назад

      @@TheHybridShooter yes, same f-number will allow same quantity of light no matter what sensor is behind it

    • @TheHybridShooter
      @TheHybridShooter  4 месяца назад +4

      @@aleksandr8809 only per area, total amount of light that gets to the sensor is completely different. That is what matters.

    • @TheHybridShooter
      @TheHybridShooter  4 месяца назад +1

      @aleksandr8809 How can the light gathering be the same if the light of same intensity is being captured on much larger area? M43 would have to capture 4 times as much light per area to match the total light gathering of the full frame, which is defintiely not the case.