He got pissee off at being wrong I think and flung out his arms to attack all he could see. He's an independent with strong TDS so another republican may have suited him. Although his take on Vance here is wrong.
@@janitorizampedHe said exactly that in multiple posts and interviews. He would smugly tell anyone that mathematically, It was impossible for Trump to win because he would not carry the independent vote. He left no wiggle room on this prediction.
@@Michael-cb5nm no, he never said that, you "people" have been spreading this lie for months now and not one of you has been able to point to where he said that. "I think it happened in a video that maybe someone else who I don't remember posted"
Right after he explains that "famine" capable of starving "more than 500 million worldwide" that he predicted happening, oh, 2 years ago? LOL Turns out, Ukraine Tie Boy doesn't know squat.
His long term economic predictions are probably going to be spot on as he bases them on nearly unchangeable facts (Eg. geography, population aging, etc.). His thoughts on on how wars are fought is pretty abysmal and very amateurish. That is where he is probably the worst as he is always trying to tell people what other countries 'intend to do' (and involves a lot of personal bias) rather than just basing his estimates on what they are capable of doing.
Unfortunately, the same models he uses on the past and present are the ones he uses to describe the future, so I don't think you should have much faith in any of them. I still like his channel, and get SOMETHING from it, but a coherent model of change in the world is not one of those things.
It was very hard to imagine for educated people that people seriously considered voting for Trump, even if the polls suggested that it was entirely in the realm of possibilities. It's just a (morbidly) fascinating case of collective irrationality.
@@DiamondLil It's a funny simile, but it's less true than you think. There is a positive correlation between intelligence and levels of education. There is actually somewhat of a negative correlation with morality and religiousness. There are studies on the latter by Jonathan Haidt, Will Gervais, Ara Norenzayan, and Phil Zuckerman. I'm being a little hyperbolic here (hence the "somewhat"), and you shouldn't interpret the above as "religion makes people immoral". The conclusions generally are that "religion is by no means a requirement for morality", and "religions emphasis on authority and obedience _introduces risk_ of immoral behavior and empirically has done so many times in the past".
Doesn’t matter. We all know trump wont follow through with 1/4 of his campaign promises. Even when the senate and house are red. For example, more billions are going to Ukraine no matter who won
I'm trying to find the video from a few months ago where PZ, in his usual uber-confident know-it-all style, stated that Trump would only take 12 states. 😂😂😂😂
Not empty I think. Has rational and emotional drivers and is truthful about the rational side he can see at least. But he is over confident in how much he knows and also how little he thinks his emotions affect him.
I still remember his take on my native Norway with incredulity. But that doesnt mean he doesnt see some clear main trends/points that are worth listening too.
@@hinkelstein69 Not likely. Nor am I. He is an aging hippy and this has warped his judgement. He believes in Global Warming. The evidence came in in 1996 that GW is a hoax. Cores drilled into the ice in Antartica give us a two+ million year record of CO2 and Earth's average temperature. The Environmentalists got it ass backwards. When the temperature rises so will the CO2 level. What is happening is the CO2 gases out of the oceans. His assessment of Biden and his cohorts is absurd. Biden controls nothing. His character and competence assessment of Trump and Vance is preposterous. He keeps making me sprinkle his opinions with more and more salt.
This is not one of those instances where there is such an understanding. We're not comparing apples and apples; with one outcome after today, we can probably predict certain foreign policy trajectories in the future. With the other, we can't predict what will happen at all. Two entirely different universes.
Agreed 100%. Sad that the days where that could be a reasonable expectation of our elected govt. are well and truly dead. It's no longer in their best interest to give two figs about the people who elected them. They follow the money.
lol, cmon now. You do realize the biggest funders to the Harris campaign are Cheney and blackeock, right? Thats who they will ultimately be loyal to, whether any of them know it or not.
This is me exactly. He is very articulate and seemingly well informed, but his conclusions have become increasing uncredible and many (if not most) have failed spectacularly. That doesn't seem to bother him - he just keeps on cranking them out...
I more or less agreed with the version of Peter Zeihan circa 2018-19. The post-COVID, 2021-present Peter is blind, eternally butt-hurt and possesses zero understanding of what is happening in front of his very own face, inside his very own country. Until he can come to grips with pretty obvious phenomenon like this year's US election results, there is just no point in taking him seriously as a commentator anymore.
He claimed, with utter surety, that Trump has no chance at all because the independent voters would decide this election, and they would vote against Trump. WRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGG!!!
He did, but there hadnt been two assassination attempts or the platforming and support of Trump on so many very large podcast platforms. I think, at the time, Peters analysis was a reasonable one, but so much changed at the last that we got a Trump win. if only he could stop bloviating and be a little magnanimous he *might* be able to be a uniting figure rather than a divisive one, but I doubt he will. Harris was dreadful though. Truly dreadful.
I waited an hour in line last night in southern Minnesota to vote. I always love to vote on the actual election day, but I'm afraid the lines are going to be pretty amazing. Get out and vote and wear comfortable shoes.
Yo! Zeihan, bro I gotta give it to you--you are a hell of a a song-and-dance-man. You're as glib, self-assured & entertaining when when you're dead wrong as when you're almost right.
This is the first time ive heard someone dis both candidates… and exactly how I feel too. Finally honest opinion without blind hatred to either or both. Just factual … thank you you are my hero!
We know Trump through and through, at least with Harris there's a possibility it will be better than that. Not much to hang your hat on, but these are the options on offer. You can only order what's on the menu.
He was wrong on that one bc Elon is literally so stupid that any decision making process cannot be intersepted by ideological arguments. So no, Musk is not a Nazi, he is just stupid.
Wow, congratulations on your impressive nvestment success! Your discipline and focus on delayed gratification is truly inspiring. I'm curious, what are some of the key factors that you consider when making :nvestment decisions? Do you have any tips for those of us who are just starting to dip our toes into the world of :nvesting? Thanks for sharing your story!
The U.S. economy relies on ongoing credit and debt generation for sustenance. The Federal Reserve is expected to increase the money supply, leading to further debt accumulation for the average American. This situation raises concerns about who will ultimately bear the consequences of these economic dynamics.
Since the debt crisis could unleash carnage on the stock market leading to economic downturns. We need to be prepared for potential market volatility. how can I secure my $600K stock portfolio against declining?
Concentrate on two main objectives. First, keep yourself safe by knowing when to sell stocks in order to limit losses and maximize gains. Second, get ready to benefit from market changes. I advise consulting a coach or other professional for advice.
I talk a lot about how important it is to have an advisor.This kept me afloat and increased my $450,000 portfolio by 48% in just 4 months.They have strategies that are tailored to your long-term goals and your desired financial situation.
Trump was not suppose to win this election, he printed 3 trillion dollars in 2020 and caused inflation, he had a crazy failed peace deal with Kim Jung Un that was a massive failure, Trump is the FIRST President since Bill Clinton to ban guns, but people have short memory, after getting shot at he will probably come after gun owners now pretty hard in the coming years, Trump failed to punish China which easily found loop holes like TEMU sending packages tariff free with air cargo that Trump tariffs forgot was an option, oops. And the US trade deficit to China has never been larger too. And if Trump tries to fight with China, they will cut off trade = inflation so massive, the shortages will be so catastrophic in the USA that we will probably have civil war. Imagine every store has nothing for sale, and what is on stock costs 100x more then today, not going to end well. China holds all the keys, Trump can act like we do, but he's just living still in TV world, like the actor he plays up that he is. Trump is a TV actor, who is playing a President. Good luck.
Donald Trump has no experience in the real world????? After having been successful in the construction biz in New York City???? After having been POTUS already, with glowing results???? After having suffered absolutely THE WORST political persecution in this country's history??? C'mon, Pete, you've forced me to to doubt you on that one.
Peter reminds me of this smart kid I knew in high school. He had a great memory of what was done in lectures. Phenomenal in being focused on the present task and knowing the assignments to be handed in. Ever wanted to know what the teacher had said about two weeks back. He was your go-to guy. Wanted to know exactly what was meant on Problem 3, part b. Well, he was the guy you called or went to do a group study session. But then he would tell you, and most convincingly, what would be on the upcoming exam and how best to prepare, what strategy you should have to be sure you were fully prepared, and how best to spend your time studying. And so, you listened and followed what he said. I mean after all, he had this great stellar track record of knowing what was and is, so why doubt now what will be too? So when he said "Ms. Jenkins is gonna pull a sneaky move on us on this midterm. Remember the Wednesday of the first of last month," he would begin. No! No, I don't remember. None of us but you remember. I don't even remember what color socks I have on right now, but go on... "Well," he would continue with a relaxed confidence that just won you over, "she had said 'pay close attention, as this approach pops up at unexpected times.' And that approach was using that seemingly aside technique of partial fractions in the Taylor's series to solve for sine of x. Only she's going to have us do it for tangent of x. Because you remember when she said "but this is just a tangential subject but you should know it for your own good, so pay attention?" Hint, hint. Eh? See? Well, I was paying attention. So most of the exam will be solving tangent of x broken as a Taylor expansion for sine and cosine of x." So we all believed he was right about this. Why wouldn't we? I mean, he was always right. I mean just right after annoyingly, freaking right... Up to the present that is. Come the exam and nothing on it had anything to do with partial fractions or Mr. Taylor or sine or cosine or tangent! In fact, it had everything to do with the homework problems, which of course the rest of us never reviewed since we were solving Taylor series and completely forget except our friend, the picture memory freak that aced the exam nonetheless. "Gee, was I off about what was gonna be on the exam, eh?" he said. So... we decided to never listen to his predictions but just his knowledge of the past and present. Not gonna lie. For a few us, our first thoughts was to Tony Soprano him but he was a likable guy. Smart or not, he was worthless about a microsecond into the future though. And nah, we did kill him.
@@volnick Not really, Donald trump is unique in the way of he really hasn't even had full support of his party or anything close to it, a lot of the career republican politicians have been watching from the side lines for the last 8 years and just observering.
It has come to this because people like to live in a fairytale, the adults in the room used to be the old GOP (and even old Dems), now that both parties turned populists there are no adults anymore and the people are too dumb to realize that they are headed to a cliff.
Republicans only care about fiscal responsibility when not in power. Democrats care more but are unwilling to make social spending cuts or large tax increases so their options are limited. Will it lead to budgetary problems? If you view the debt as something the US will someday have to pay back in full then yes. If you view the debt as a smoke screen so it doesn't look like the US is filling in budget shortfalls by effectively printing money then no.
I remember Peter smugly declaring that trump would lose in a landalide, not to kamala but to Biden!! 😂😂😂😂😂 If you are going to claim you know exactly what's going to happen, then you better be right! I.assume.he will make a video addressing why he was so wrong!
*America After the Election: Foreign Policy - Key Takeaways* * *0:00** Introduction and Context:* Peter Zeihan addresses a viewer question about the future of US foreign policy post-election, emphasizing the current state of flux and uncertainty. * *0:26** The End of Bipartisan Consensus:* Zeihan argues that the long-standing bipartisan agreement on foreign policy (containment of Soviet Union/Communism and promotion of global free trade) has eroded over the past 16 years, particularly under Obama, Trump, and Biden. * *1:53** Party Realignment:* The Republican party, traditionally the architect of US foreign policy, is undergoing internal shifts, with factions aligning on certain issues with adversaries like Russia and China. * *2:17** US in a State of Flux:* The US faces a period of significant internal and external change, impacting its national security and economic policies. * *3:05** Kamala Harris's Inexperience:* Zeihan critiques Kamala Harris's lack of experience and suggests her potential presidency would be unpredictable, relying on advisors who may not be personally loyal to her. * *4:27** Donald Trump's Decline:* Zeihan expresses concerns about Donald Trump's mental state and capacity for the presidency, suggesting his running mate, JD Vance, would effectively be in charge. * *5:09** Uncertainty and Inexperience:* Both potential presidents (Harris and Vance) are described as economically populist with limited real-world and government experience, making their policy priorities difficult to predict. * *6:13** NAFTA as a Constant:* Zeihan highlights NAFTA (renegotiated as NAFTA 2 under Trump) as a rare example of foreign policy solidified by Congress, making it likely to endure regardless of the election outcome. * *7:13** Importance of NAFTA:* Zeihan praises the updated NAFTA agreement, particularly its focus on strengthening the US-Mexico trade relationship, viewing it as crucial for the future of the US economy. * *7:58** Conclusion:* Zeihan emphasizes the overall instability and unpredictability of the current situation, but suggests NAFTA's endurance is a positive development in preparation for future global challenges. I used gemini-1.5-pro-exp-0827 on rocketrecap dot com to summarize the transcript. Cost (if I didn't use the free tier): $0.02 Input tokens: 16672 Output tokens: 462
ChatGPT didn't render anything close. Your Gemini did a better job of summarizing Peter's video. Chat brought in elements and suppositions that Peter never mentioned.
When you state that neither have experience in the real world, I'd like to understand how you define the real world. Is "Making it" in NYC not the real world? An honest question.
Peter is with the establishment and status quo h that got him his consulting business succeed and made him rich! He’s a neocon and American exceptionalist. He’s for the US empire tying to rule the world. He’s also for your jobs getting shipped abroad with those trade partnerships. Just know who he is.
As an American, I agree with this but I think the key thing to understand is that he is both a deep state actor and a globalist. His interest is in American State power - not in the American people.
If you are so negative on Peter, why the heck are you still watching? Your job? Because that rant sure feels like it came from a list of disconnected talking points.
“I can tell you that in terms of the general election this is going to be at best a Goldwater style blowout.” - Peter Zeihan, predicting an embarrassing defeat for Trump in Feb 29th 2024, “Power Hungry Podcast” with Robert Bryce, time stamp 38:06.
engaged with Australia I think that is a safe bet all things considered, time and resources invested and I think both the American public and the US government just like Australia. with the rest of the world beyond some light theatrics probably not with admittedly a decent list of exceptions, especially if we are serious about domestic issues on the North American continent.
"hope The USA stays engaged" I'm afraid the way US stays engaged also matters. To the point in which a bad US engagement is worse than none. Like US engaging Russia/China on friendly terms and ditching NATO/AUKUS Cheers, mate, have a good night
@@mikewolf-x6t The USA practically invented Global Trade at Bretton Woods after WW2. US Hegemony has probably prevented more Wars than it has started. There would be a lot more Ukraine's without US engagement. Hell, in the Ukraine we have Putin must be regretting ever starting that cluster f***.
Wishful thinking. She speaks just fine. The trouble is you don't listing to word of it and instead subsitute your own ignorance and assumptions. @@thomasv9258
He's dead nuts on. Neither Duopoly establishment politics party represents the best interest of the US voter anymore. Yes, they are equally shitty and two sides of the same coin. The problem is MUCH deeper than a left/right political facade.
Maybe a good oppty for people to see Zeihan is not offering a neutral non-partisan perspective which in fact blinds him to critically important realities.
Who the heck has been running the Country???? It would be very interesting to know who you recognize as 'competent' and capable of directing our foreign policy.
By and large it's been the instutions that we've set up and the advisors to the past two Presidents. Our Democracy is set up in such a way that even if we elect a baboon to lead us the bureaucracy will carry on.
@@Eggster68 I could possibly buy into that thought...although I wonder what is her 'thinking' v the Cheney/neocon perceptions? I would like to hear her contemporary insights.
I’m struggling to remember a time when Peter predicted something right. China, Russia/Ukraine, the election. The opposite has happened for all these outcomes, and he wants you to pay for his “analysis” 😂😂😂😂
No, it's truly a choice between candidates. The personal qualities of the president are of overshadowing importance, and Trump is wildly unfit for office. The choice between party platforms is in the elections for congress.
@stevebriggs9399 he ran the Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen wars, assassinated an Iranian general and quadrupled drone strikes. And then he mishandled a pandemic, lost the election and launched a coup attempt to stay in power.
I actually had the privilege of talking to Peter one-on-one for over an hour in the Mexico City Airport in 2023. (Got so engrossed I missed my flight. LOL) Peter told me that day that 2024 would be the last election for the Republican party, and that Rs would lose so badly they'd have to totally rebuild, or start a new party. At the time it felt very wrong, and it didn't age well, either.
Peter claimed that there was no way Trump could beat any Democrat because he would not carry independents. He had been saying this for over a year…confidently predicting a Democratic victory, specifically a Biden victory. So Kamala I guess was such a historically bad candidate that this calculus was destroyed? Blame Kamala? Would like to see a bit more humility from Peter on this issue…he does not seem to want to admit that his model of US politics is flawed.
Kamala probably played the role she was given, but yes, she was a historically bad candidate for anyone who wasn't completely satisfied with the status quo or voting entirely on race/sex.
@@Michael-cb5nm if he doesn't understand USA politics (his own country and language) than how can he be such an expert on all these other nations he has never been to or speaks the language of. Ex: Russia, China, Ukraine, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Korea (N & S), & the rest...
@@here_for_the Because he's developed the communication elements of a grifter, talk quickly and speak as if you're an expert and cant be wrong. Those are manipulation techniques, and they work well on a large portion of the population that has personal doubts about being correct ("speak as if you're an expert and cant be wrong") themselves and cant think quickly ("talk quickly" aka talk above the average persons scrutiny ability). So those people become overwhelmed with what's being sold : That guys right and spits facts like a machine.
One correction. Saying that Harris' only experience was being a prosecutor ignores the fact that she was in the Senate for longer than Obama and certainly longer than Vance. That is all. JFC give it a rest. She's living rent free with you. I was just pointing out a factual error in his statement.
Considering how inelegantly and ineloquently she speaks I am shocked she was ever an attorney. Just looked it up, she went to a terrible law school. That makes a lot of sense. It's about the only place that would have let her practice law.
Let’s really be honest about this Peter You have been wrong about the outcome of this election for 3 years straight And not just a little bit wrong, you literally guaranteed the opposite of the actual result Will you admit your error? If not please don’t ever pretend to make any future predictions 5:45
Not 2 cents Utter full throated certainty with derision intimated in every syllable, for 3 years He has to address his embarrassing failure or nothing he says holds any weight in the future
So Trump's degradation was "on full display," yet I don't once recall Peter commenting on any mental degradation from Biden even once it became painfully obvious. And this is why I am forced to take Peter with a big grain of salt, because he allows his personal politics to dramatically bias his analysis.
@@agustintarzian9450 - Oh, forgive me then, if he did call it out only once it became painfully obvious to everyone. That clearly obviates my entire argument. Good job!
@@dhunter1133 fun fact yes what i have written obviates your entire argument. you say that peter never commented on biden's degeneration even when this was obvious and that this proved his bias. And what you say is a lie, because Peter did comment on Biden's degeneration, and he has a video about it. And i can give you the link to the video if you don't want to believe me.
@@dhunter1133 fun fact yes what i have written obviates your entire argument. you say that peter never commented on biden's degeneration even when this was obvious and that this proved his bias. And what you say is a lie, because Peter did comment on Biden's degeneration, and he has a video about it. I can give you a link to the video if you don't want to believe me. This is the factual and verifiable reality and if you don't like it or it bothers you, well, joke's on you pal
@dhunter1133 fun fact yes what i have written obviates your entire argument. you say that peter never commented on biden's degeneration even when this was obvious and that this proved his bias. But Peter did comment on Biden's degeneration, and he has a video about it. I can give you a link to the video if you don't want to believe me.
I'd like to see a video about how you got the election result so wrong. A year ago you were saying Trump would lose in a landslide.
Peter had...disadvantages when it came to predicting the 2024 election. Specifically, his TDS.
It was actually more like two weeks ago
2nd worse loss in us history he said
Just unsubscribed. Stop listening to people that were wrong.
@@JohnSmith-np9qu are you always right?🤔
I remember you saying that Trump had zero chance of winning.
No you don't lmao
Peter said that Biden would win.
He got pissee off at being wrong I think and flung out his arms to attack all he could see. He's an independent with strong TDS so another republican may have suited him. Although his take on Vance here is wrong.
@@janitorizampedHe said exactly that in multiple posts and interviews. He would smugly tell anyone that mathematically, It was impossible for Trump to win because he would not carry the independent vote. He left no wiggle room on this prediction.
@@Michael-cb5nm no, he never said that, you "people" have been spreading this lie for months now and not one of you has been able to point to where he said that. "I think it happened in a video that maybe someone else who I don't remember posted"
"by the time you see this, I'm already out of the country" lmao!
Lmao facts
And stay out!!
That means he thinks Trump will win.
@@joeschmoe8965 no, that means Trump loses and starts a shitstorm
Basically saying "F you. Bye!" 🤣
Sounds like you NEED to address your incorrect, drastically wrong, election prediction?
Right after he explains that "famine" capable of starving "more than 500 million worldwide" that he predicted happening, oh, 2 years ago? LOL Turns out, Ukraine Tie Boy doesn't know squat.
@@junkscience6397 This . The dude is a joke
It’s as accurate as his China predictions. At least he is consistent. He gets his financial advice from Cramer, so he has built a network
Cosmo Cramer?
@@junkscience6397 He did not predicted that, he said that if China did X at the time, a famine that would kill 500 million chinese would happen.
Remember when he predicted that Trump had no chance?
“No one is going to vote for a convicted felon hahaha!”
Aged like fine milk. 😂
because he actualy couldnt believe that people are able to do that.
@@unbekannterinterpret Which makes him lousy at making political predictions:)
@@a.brekkan4965 makes him a human with ethics and moral
I would like to see a reflection of him why he was wrong. Is his world view too far of?
Peter is great at describing the past, good at describing the present and... a lot less good at describing the future. Consistently.
His long term economic predictions are probably going to be spot on as he bases them on nearly unchangeable facts (Eg. geography, population aging, etc.). His thoughts on on how wars are fought is pretty abysmal and very amateurish. That is where he is probably the worst as he is always trying to tell people what other countries 'intend to do' (and involves a lot of personal bias) rather than just basing his estimates on what they are capable of doing.
Most of us kind of are..
his war predictions were very early and spot on. his inflation prediction is playing out. spray and pray
@@andersbjrnsen7203 Most of us don't do it for a living though. No disrespect to Peter.
Unfortunately, the same models he uses on the past and present are the ones he uses to describe the future, so I don't think you should have much faith in any of them. I still like his channel, and get SOMETHING from it, but a coherent model of change in the world is not one of those things.
This man came through, shitted on everyone and then left.😂
Absolute legend
A dose of reality for the partisans on both sides!
And made the snow yellow.
As he should.
AS
HE
SHOULD.
Based and Zeihan-pilled.
'Trump has no shot' x 50 = Peter Zeihan
It was very hard to imagine for educated people that people seriously considered voting for Trump, even if the polls suggested that it was entirely in the realm of possibilities. It's just a (morbidly) fascinating case of collective irrationality.
@@mr-boo this can be said both ways so a pretty irrelevant thing to say at all
@@mr-boo equating "educated" with intelligence is like equating "goes to church" with goodness.
@@DiamondLil It's a funny simile, but it's less true than you think. There is a positive correlation between intelligence and levels of education. There is actually somewhat of a negative correlation with morality and religiousness. There are studies on the latter by Jonathan Haidt, Will Gervais, Ara Norenzayan, and Phil Zuckerman. I'm being a little hyperbolic here (hence the "somewhat"), and you shouldn't interpret the above as "religion makes people immoral". The conclusions generally are that "religion is by no means a requirement for morality", and "religions emphasis on authority and obedience _introduces risk_ of immoral behavior and empirically has done so many times in the past".
@@VGDomination No
Hope Peter made it out of the Red Dead 2 tutorial safely
Now he's in Tahiti
LENNY, WHERE ARE YOU?!
He just needs MORE MONEH!
Congrats! This made me laugh really hard!
Oh my god are you Biaz, first of the Magi? If so I should run very, very far away.
Where's Zeihan now? Bit cock sure on Trump losing, what happened to your crystal ball?
Doesn’t matter. We all know trump wont follow through with 1/4 of his campaign promises. Even when the senate and house are red. For example, more billions are going to Ukraine no matter who won
Didn't expect GenZ to start voting red. Voting against their own interest is crazy work. 😊
The thing about Peter is is so convincing until he talks about something that you know a lot about. Then you realise the HE is the empty vessel
Very empty
I'm trying to find the video from a few months ago where PZ, in his usual uber-confident know-it-all style, stated that Trump would only take 12 states. 😂😂😂😂
@@raddimusmcchoyber3362 Haha. I went looking for that too
Not empty I think. Has rational and emotional drivers and is truthful about the rational side he can see at least. But he is over confident in how much he knows and also how little he thinks his emotions affect him.
I still remember his take on my native Norway with incredulity.
But that doesnt mean he doesnt see some clear main trends/points that are worth listening too.
I love how Peter Zion tells me that I am blind while ignoring the plank in his own eye, lol
are you a Zeihanist?
@@hinkelstein69 Not likely. Nor am I. He is an aging hippy and this has warped his judgement.
He believes in Global Warming. The evidence came in in 1996 that GW is a hoax. Cores drilled into the ice in Antartica give us a two+ million year record of CO2 and Earth's average temperature. The Environmentalists got it ass backwards. When the temperature rises so will the CO2 level. What is happening is the CO2 gases out of the oceans.
His assessment of Biden and his cohorts is absurd. Biden controls nothing. His character and competence assessment of Trump and Vance is preposterous. He keeps making me sprinkle his opinions with more and more salt.
@@hinkelstein69 NO I cannot support the deepstate establishment that he licks the boots of
What happened to the Harris landslide Peter promised?
No comment lol
I don't think he promised or said that.
@@campfireeverything He promised that Trump would lose by a landslide.
Under estimated how stupid the average American is. Unfortunately there are so many fools in this country.
@@campfireeverythingHe did say she would win… he was wrong too…
Good job, Peter! You pissed off everybody 😆
If this is another PZ video that infuriated you, watch the Tucker Carlson interview of MIKE BENZ.
Yep
?? Only if you are in the USA. :)
Xi and the whole CCP agreed with this idiot 100%
Lol
You really nailed that election prediction.
I thought he was going to tell us Trump had a 0% chance again. LMAO.
I gave you a thumbs up because yes that was funny!
I'm not laughing - and everyone who isn't a billionaire won't be laughing soon, either.
@@joymattson8549 enjoy your sense of impending doom then 👋
many years ago my dad told me that anyone who can piss off both sides in a conversation is probably the one who really understands the issues.
This is not one of those instances where there is such an understanding. We're not comparing apples and apples; with one outcome after today, we can probably predict certain foreign policy trajectories in the future. With the other, we can't predict what will happen at all. Two entirely different universes.
Trumpovich is going to jail 😂
being a centrist doesn't make someone correct. centrism is just another perspective.
Splitting everything down the middle just means you don't know. Nothing is 50/50.
Trump still plays golf though
I don’t want them to be loyal to her. I want them to be loyal to me and the rest of the public. That’s the problem with TFG.
Too ideal. Police won't be done that way.
Agreed 100%. Sad that the days where that could be a reasonable expectation of our elected govt. are well and truly dead. It's no longer in their best interest to give two figs about the people who elected them. They follow the money.
It should be the case, but we all know it won't be
Very true! But we have met the enemy and it is us for continuing to not demand better.
lol, cmon now. You do realize the biggest funders to the Harris campaign are Cheney and blackeock, right? Thats who they will ultimately be loyal to, whether any of them know it or not.
There was a time when I'd give credence to Zeihan but those days are past, count me out listening to him going forward
I agree, wholeheartedly
There’s always at least 50 comments saying this under all of his posts, and yet they just continue to watch him. Dramatic grown man
This is me exactly. He is very articulate and seemingly well informed, but his conclusions have become increasing uncredible and many (if not most) have failed spectacularly. That doesn't seem to bother him - he just keeps on cranking them out...
This ain't an airport.
I more or less agreed with the version of Peter Zeihan circa 2018-19. The post-COVID, 2021-present Peter is blind, eternally butt-hurt and possesses zero understanding of what is happening in front of his very own face, inside his very own country. Until he can come to grips with pretty obvious phenomenon like this year's US election results, there is just no point in taking him seriously as a commentator anymore.
I'm old enough to remember when Peter predicted Trump couldn't possibly win.
He claimed, with utter surety, that Trump has no chance at all because the independent voters would decide this election, and they would vote against Trump.
WRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGG!!!
America deserves what it votes for.
He did, but there hadnt been two assassination attempts or the platforming and support of Trump on so many very large podcast platforms. I think, at the time, Peters analysis was a reasonable one, but so much changed at the last that we got a Trump win. if only he could stop bloviating and be a little magnanimous he *might* be able to be a uniting figure rather than a divisive one, but I doubt he will. Harris was dreadful though. Truly dreadful.
@@bluerisk Exactly
BASED
Maybe Peter expected the steal again . Hard to do with no virus.
I waited an hour in line last night in southern Minnesota to vote. I always love to vote on the actual election day, but I'm afraid the lines are going to be pretty amazing. Get out and vote and wear comfortable shoes.
For Donnie?
If voting mattered it would be illegal. Mark Twain.
@Withnail1969. Does that mean you didn't vote?
I'm voting for Tim Walz
@@slimjimnyc270 I don't think I'm allowed to interfere in the American election.
Zeihan: " No matter who wins the election I'm leaving " lol.
He won't
Fun fact. Outside US we all want to leave even further away
Peter knows it'll be worse outside the US
@@george2113 lol this is such an American comment
America is the most powerful country on earth, not the nicest to live in.
Bye!
Yo! Zeihan, bro I gotta give it to you--you are a hell of a a song-and-dance-man.
You're as glib, self-assured & entertaining when when you're dead wrong as when you're almost right.
"Now that I've annoyed you I want you to know that I'm far away so don't bother trying to find me" 😂
Why are people shocked he was wrong? Hes wrong more than he's right.
NOW you admit Kami is an empty suit? You’ve been saying she’s a shoe in for months. Credibility bubee.
Saying JD Vance is more of an empty suit than Kamala almost makes anything you after completly irrelevant
You can tell this guy watches CNN.
This is the first time ive heard someone dis both candidates… and exactly how I feel too. Finally honest opinion without blind hatred to either or both. Just factual … thank you you are my hero!
Same here, I'm voting Libertarian primarily out of protest.
I could not agree more.
Same here, we exist... we are just silent and tough to find online.
No there are others who are saying both candidates equally suck....The Handsome liberal and Sabby Sabs are two Ive heardof on this platform.
We know Trump through and through, at least with Harris there's a possibility it will be better than that. Not much to hang your hat on, but these are the options on offer. You can only order what's on the menu.
I remember when Peter said Elon is basically a nazi because he comes from South Africa and his father had emerald mine.
Bleh.
But on this one he's actually right
He was wrong on that one bc Elon is literally so stupid that any decision making process cannot be intersepted by ideological arguments.
So no, Musk is not a Nazi, he is just stupid.
Thank you for recommending Sarah Jennine Davis on one of your videos. I reached out to her and investing with her has been amazing.
Wow, congratulations on your impressive nvestment success! Your discipline and focus on delayed gratification is truly inspiring. I'm curious, what are some of the key factors that you consider when making :nvestment decisions? Do you have any tips for those of us who are just starting to dip our toes into the world of :nvesting? Thanks for sharing your story!
Do you mind sharing info on the adviser who
assisted you? I'm 39 now and would love to
grow my portfolio and plan my retirement
@@FreyaFreya3 Sarah Jennine Davis is highly recommended
You most likely should get her basic info when you search her on your browser.
@@mayor-o1wHow do I access her ? I really need this
+156
the last 2 sentences had me cracking up, dammit Peter stop fleeing!
The U.S. economy relies on ongoing credit and debt generation for sustenance. The Federal Reserve is expected to increase the money supply, leading to further debt accumulation for the average American. This situation raises concerns about who will ultimately bear the consequences of these economic dynamics.
Since the debt crisis could unleash carnage on the stock market leading to economic downturns. We need to be prepared for potential market volatility. how can I secure my $600K stock portfolio against declining?
Concentrate on two main objectives. First, keep yourself safe by knowing when to sell stocks in order to limit losses and maximize gains. Second, get ready to benefit from market changes. I advise consulting a coach or other professional for advice.
I talk a lot about how important it is to have an advisor.This kept me afloat and increased my $450,000 portfolio by 48% in just 4 months.They have strategies that are tailored to your long-term goals and your desired financial situation.
@@ThomasChai05Mind if I ask you to recommend how to reach this particular coach you using their service?
Izella Annette Anderson is the licensed advisor I use. Just search the name. You’d find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment.
Peter never shied from making predictions about this election.
Never once gave Trump a chance.
But Peter sometimes gets things right, though.
@@mitchellhawkes22 When Peter gets things about the future right, it is by sheer roll of the dice.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
like when?
Except the things he gets right are usually just from reading other's work. His own guesses are always way off.
Trump was not suppose to win this election, he printed 3 trillion dollars in 2020 and caused inflation, he had a crazy failed peace deal with Kim Jung Un that was a massive failure, Trump is the FIRST President since Bill Clinton to ban guns, but people have short memory, after getting shot at he will probably come after gun owners now pretty hard in the coming years, Trump failed to punish China which easily found loop holes like TEMU sending packages tariff free with air cargo that Trump tariffs forgot was an option, oops. And the US trade deficit to China has never been larger too. And if Trump tries to fight with China, they will cut off trade = inflation so massive, the shortages will be so catastrophic in the USA that we will probably have civil war. Imagine every store has nothing for sale, and what is on stock costs 100x more then today, not going to end well. China holds all the keys, Trump can act like we do, but he's just living still in TV world, like the actor he plays up that he is. Trump is a TV actor, who is playing a President. Good luck.
Donald Trump has no experience in the real world????? After having been successful in the construction biz in New York City???? After having been POTUS already, with glowing results???? After having suffered absolutely THE WORST political persecution in this country's history??? C'mon, Pete, you've forced me to to doubt you on that one.
Australian here; Whelp, let's see if we can still buy our submarines this time tomorrow...
oh right, you guys are buying a nuclear submarine... why are you doing that ?
I hope so... but, you might want to keep the French on speed dial, just in case.
@@masterchinese28 they might want full payment up front this time
@@lowermichigan4437 You may be right about that.
Make AUKUS great again.
Peter reminds me of this smart kid I knew in high school. He had a great memory of what was done in lectures. Phenomenal in being focused on the present task and knowing the assignments to be handed in. Ever wanted to know what the teacher had said about two weeks back. He was your go-to guy. Wanted to know exactly what was meant on Problem 3, part b. Well, he was the guy you called or went to do a group study session. But then he would tell you, and most convincingly, what would be on the upcoming exam and how best to prepare, what strategy you should have to be sure you were fully prepared, and how best to spend your time studying.
And so, you listened and followed what he said. I mean after all, he had this great stellar track record of knowing what was and is, so why doubt now what will be too? So when he said "Ms. Jenkins is gonna pull a sneaky move on us on this midterm. Remember the Wednesday of the first of last month," he would begin. No! No, I don't remember. None of us but you remember. I don't even remember what color socks I have on right now, but go on... "Well," he would continue with a relaxed confidence that just won you over, "she had said 'pay close attention, as this approach pops up at unexpected times.' And that approach was using that seemingly aside technique of partial fractions in the Taylor's series to solve for sine of x. Only she's going to have us do it for tangent of x. Because you remember when she said "but this is just a tangential subject but you should know it for your own good, so pay attention?" Hint, hint. Eh? See? Well, I was paying attention. So most of the exam will be solving tangent of x broken as a Taylor expansion for sine and cosine of x."
So we all believed he was right about this. Why wouldn't we? I mean, he was always right. I mean just right after annoyingly, freaking right... Up to the present that is. Come the exam and nothing on it had anything to do with partial fractions or Mr. Taylor or sine or cosine or tangent! In fact, it had everything to do with the homework problems, which of course the rest of us never reviewed since we were solving Taylor series and completely forget except our friend, the picture memory freak that aced the exam nonetheless. "Gee, was I off about what was gonna be on the exam, eh?" he said. So... we decided to never listen to his predictions but just his knowledge of the past and present. Not gonna lie. For a few us, our first thoughts was to Tony Soprano him but he was a likable guy. Smart or not, he was worthless about a microsecond into the future though.
And nah, we did kill him.
I’m freezing just looking at Peter…and I’m wearing a sweatshirt and relaxing in LA.
It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas!
In a new episode of “ another hot air from Zeihan”.
"By the time you see this, you should know I'm already out of the country. " 😂🤣😂🤣
This is problem.
His a 🪱 and anyway he goes with his passport, his rotting the environment...
The accidental superpower. The absent superpower. Next??? The bipolar Superpower ...
Bro we've been that since we hit superpowerdom
Steve Briggs is right. It’s not a contest between two presidents. It’s a contest between two parties.
It's a contest between good and evil.
@@volnick Not really, Donald trump is unique in the way of he really hasn't even had full support of his party or anything close to it, a lot of the career republican politicians have been watching from the side lines for the last 8 years and just observering.
Trump changed the complexity of the Republican Party
@@michaelpoteet4171 How can you say the democrat party hasn't become evil?
@@volnick a good portion of the politicians in the democratic party are absolutely evil and selfish.
So, this is me stating that THE GREAT PETER ZEIHAN was completely wrong about the US presidential election!
The real issue is that congress threw fiscal responsibility out of the window. At this pace, by 2028 the US will have very serious budgetary problems.
It has come to this because people like to live in a fairytale, the adults in the room used to be the old GOP (and even old Dems), now that both parties turned populists there are no adults anymore and the people are too dumb to realize that they are headed to a cliff.
Republicans only care about fiscal responsibility when not in power. Democrats care more but are unwilling to make social spending cuts or large tax increases so their options are limited. Will it lead to budgetary problems? If you view the debt as something the US will someday have to pay back in full then yes. If you view the debt as a smoke screen so it doesn't look like the US is filling in budget shortfalls by effectively printing money then no.
Very.
I remember Peter smugly declaring that trump would lose in a landalide, not to kamala but to Biden!! 😂😂😂😂😂
If you are going to claim you know exactly what's going to happen, then you better be right!
I.assume.he will make a video addressing why he was so wrong!
*America After the Election: Foreign Policy - Key Takeaways*
* *0:00** Introduction and Context:* Peter Zeihan addresses a viewer question about the future of US foreign policy post-election, emphasizing the current state of flux and uncertainty.
* *0:26** The End of Bipartisan Consensus:* Zeihan argues that the long-standing bipartisan agreement on foreign policy (containment of Soviet Union/Communism and promotion of global free trade) has eroded over the past 16 years, particularly under Obama, Trump, and Biden.
* *1:53** Party Realignment:* The Republican party, traditionally the architect of US foreign policy, is undergoing internal shifts, with factions aligning on certain issues with adversaries like Russia and China.
* *2:17** US in a State of Flux:* The US faces a period of significant internal and external change, impacting its national security and economic policies.
* *3:05** Kamala Harris's Inexperience:* Zeihan critiques Kamala Harris's lack of experience and suggests her potential presidency would be unpredictable, relying on advisors who may not be personally loyal to her.
* *4:27** Donald Trump's Decline:* Zeihan expresses concerns about Donald Trump's mental state and capacity for the presidency, suggesting his running mate, JD Vance, would effectively be in charge.
* *5:09** Uncertainty and Inexperience:* Both potential presidents (Harris and Vance) are described as economically populist with limited real-world and government experience, making their policy priorities difficult to predict.
* *6:13** NAFTA as a Constant:* Zeihan highlights NAFTA (renegotiated as NAFTA 2 under Trump) as a rare example of foreign policy solidified by Congress, making it likely to endure regardless of the election outcome.
* *7:13** Importance of NAFTA:* Zeihan praises the updated NAFTA agreement, particularly its focus on strengthening the US-Mexico trade relationship, viewing it as crucial for the future of the US economy.
* *7:58** Conclusion:* Zeihan emphasizes the overall instability and unpredictability of the current situation, but suggests NAFTA's endurance is a positive development in preparation for future global challenges.
I used gemini-1.5-pro-exp-0827 on rocketrecap dot com to summarize the transcript.
Cost (if I didn't use the free tier): $0.02
Input tokens: 16672
Output tokens: 462
Cool. I'm going to do the same thing with ChatGPT and see how they differ.
ChatGPT didn't render anything close. Your Gemini did a better job of summarizing Peter's video. Chat brought in elements and suppositions that Peter never mentioned.
I watch Peter often to get exposure to different perspectives but never forget he is ultimately a soothsayer to the powers that be…
Aren't you a ray of sunshine this morning 😂
Hilarious
Same problem as in Germany. Structural decline of Quality of Personal in our political parties.
A general decline in human capital will result in an even more pronounced decline in human capital that is elected.
Personnel.
In case of Maga the political party quality has increased tremendously. Peter completely ignores all the others that come with Trump.
Don't eat the yellow snow behind you.
I ate yellow snow and I'm fine.
But that's the best part 😭
Where the huskies go
I think if the yellow stuff is behind him he should see a physician. That stuff should be rather darker.
This guy is clearly of the "consultant class" which will not be needed going forward. Good luck finding a new job
LOL. He already has so much money, he can donate away ALL his books' proceeds to charity. Come on, bro. Get real.
When you state that neither have experience in the real world, I'd like to understand how you define the real world. Is "Making it" in NYC not the real world? An honest question.
Peter is with the establishment and status quo h that got him his consulting business succeed and made him rich!
He’s a neocon and American exceptionalist. He’s for the US empire tying to rule the world. He’s also for your jobs getting shipped abroad with those trade partnerships.
Just know who he is.
I like him a lot better then you!
@@michaelshannon3019 Especially for saying that Trump would lose by a landslide:)
Ok
As an American, I agree with this but I think the key thing to understand is that he is both a deep state actor and a globalist. His interest is in American State power - not in the American people.
If you are so negative on Peter, why the heck are you still watching? Your job? Because that rant sure feels like it came from a list of disconnected talking points.
The seminal work of Renaissance Italy is called "The Agony and the Ecstasy.". For us, it will be called "The Weak and the Dumb."
-appears
-shits on everyone
-flees the country
-refuses to elaborate
zeihan is the perfect example of double think
Trump indicated he would place tariffs on Mexico imports. How is that for NAFTA and giving Trump credit.
Rational and humorous with a perfect exit 🎉
The only thing I take with a block of salt is Peter's predicitions
3:43 but you said she was going to win?! Haha
'By the time you see this, I'm probably out of the country'. The ultimate post-and-ghost!
“I can tell you that in terms of the general election this is going to be at best a Goldwater style blowout.”
- Peter Zeihan, predicting an embarrassing defeat for Trump in Feb 29th 2024, “Power Hungry Podcast” with Robert Bryce, time stamp 38:06.
You need a video explaining how you got the election so wrong.
Hey Pete, hope The USA stays engaged.
Good luck and have a safe and happy election
Day. To all side, from Australia.
engaged with Australia I think that is a safe bet all things considered, time and resources invested and I think both the American public and the US government just like Australia. with the rest of the world beyond some light theatrics probably not with admittedly a decent list of exceptions, especially if we are serious about domestic issues on the North American continent.
"hope The USA stays engaged" I'm afraid the way US stays engaged also matters. To the point in which a bad US engagement is worse than none. Like US engaging Russia/China on friendly terms and ditching NATO/AUKUS
Cheers, mate, have a good night
Engaged??? Like another endless war???
@@mikewolf-x6t The USA practically invented Global Trade at Bretton Woods after WW2. US Hegemony has probably prevented more Wars than it has started. There would be a lot more Ukraine's without US engagement. Hell, in the Ukraine we have Putin must be regretting ever starting that cluster f***.
Put some prawns on the barbie and have a good one, mate.
You forgot Harris was a senator.
Did you forget she’s incapable of defending her stances, or even just talking?
@@thomasv9258she wouldn’t even say how she voted yesterday, she’s flakeier than a Cadburys Flake.
He's long on bullshit and short on facts
She never successfully passed any legislation. None!!
Wishful thinking. She speaks just fine. The trouble is you don't listing to word of it and instead subsitute your own ignorance and assumptions. @@thomasv9258
Just listening to Zeihan here, one could think both sides were about equally shitty. Absurd.
He's dead nuts on. Neither Duopoly establishment politics party represents the best interest of the US voter anymore. Yes, they are equally shitty and two sides of the same coin. The problem is MUCH deeper than a left/right political facade.
Maybe a good oppty for people to see Zeihan is not offering a neutral non-partisan perspective which in fact blinds him to critically important realities.
Told you that you were wrong about Trump.
This from the guy who said Joe Biden was a shoo in?
🎉Trump 2024 you were wrong
I have to admit a measure of satisfaction that Peter’s prediction of Trump losing was dead wrong. Aged like milk.
Boy you were wrong! You thought Giggles was a sure thing! I lost on $400 bet on her. What a poor candidate!
I’m Canadian so this video didn’t piss me off…. Lol
Count your blessings
Trump thumped Kamala way harder than SF mayor Willie Brown
I went from thinking he was pretty insightful a few years ago to knowing he is an eloquent liberal.
Peter had no view on Biden’s declining faculties when it mattered but he definitely is unbiased in terms of Trump’s cognitive abilities…
Rubbish, he talked about Biden's declining faculties at length.
They both are shitting themselves daily. This is a non argument. You’re braindead bud. Go get your brown shirt out.
Untrue. He did a video on the mental accuity of both candidates. It was appropriately depressing.
At least you’re accountable…not!
Who the heck has been running the Country???? It would be very interesting to know who you recognize as 'competent' and capable of directing our foreign policy.
Biden. Just because you don't see him on TV every minute of every day doesn't mean he's not working hard every day (instead of playing golf).
By and large it's been the instutions that we've set up and the advisors to the past two Presidents. Our Democracy is set up in such a way that even if we elect a baboon to lead us the bureaucracy will carry on.
Condi Rice
@@Eggster68 I could possibly buy into that thought...although I wonder what is her 'thinking' v the Cheney/neocon perceptions? I would like to hear her contemporary insights.
Money
I’m struggling to remember a time when Peter predicted something right. China, Russia/Ukraine, the election. The opposite has happened for all these outcomes, and he wants you to pay for his “analysis” 😂😂😂😂
It's not a choice between candidates. It's a choice between party platforms.
Choice between trump and democrat party
No, it's truly a choice between candidates. The personal qualities of the president are of overshadowing importance, and Trump is wildly unfit for office. The choice between party platforms is in the elections for congress.
@jesan733 Trump has already had the office. No wars. NAFTA II, Abraham Accords. He's quite qualified for the office.
@stevebriggs9399 he ran the Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen wars, assassinated an Iranian general and quadrupled drone strikes. And then he mishandled a pandemic, lost the election and launched a coup attempt to stay in power.
@@stevebriggs9399 he ran multiple wars and launched a coup attempt.
You were wrong about the election 😂
NAFTA NATION:
• Every Tuesday is Taco Tuesday.
• Maple Syrup Milk Tea Sold Everywhere.
• Unlimited Corn, Elote 4 All.
Now gobble till you wobble!
I actually had the privilege of talking to Peter one-on-one for over an hour in the Mexico City Airport in 2023. (Got so engrossed I missed my flight. LOL) Peter told me that day that 2024 would be the last election for the Republican party, and that Rs would lose so badly they'd have to totally rebuild, or start a new party. At the time it felt very wrong, and it didn't age well, either.
Peter claimed that there was no way Trump could beat any Democrat because he would not carry independents. He had been saying this for over a year…confidently predicting a Democratic victory, specifically a Biden victory.
So Kamala I guess was such a historically bad candidate that this calculus was destroyed? Blame Kamala?
Would like to see a bit more humility from Peter on this issue…he does not seem to want to admit that his model of US politics is flawed.
Kamala probably played the role she was given, but yes, she was a historically bad candidate for anyone who wasn't completely satisfied with the status quo or voting entirely on race/sex.
@@Michael-cb5nm if he doesn't understand USA politics (his own country and language) than how can he be such an expert on all these other nations he has never been to or speaks the language of.
Ex: Russia, China, Ukraine, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Korea (N & S), & the rest...
@@here_for_the
Because he's developed the communication elements of a grifter, talk quickly and speak as if you're an expert and cant be wrong.
Those are manipulation techniques, and they work well on a large portion of the population that has personal doubts about being correct ("speak as if you're an expert and cant be wrong") themselves and cant think quickly ("talk quickly" aka talk above the average persons scrutiny ability).
So those people become overwhelmed with what's being sold : That guys right and spits facts like a machine.
One correction. Saying that Harris' only experience was being a prosecutor ignores the fact that she was in the Senate for longer than Obama and certainly longer than Vance. That is all.
JFC give it a rest. She's living rent free with you. I was just pointing out a factual error in his statement.
Considering how inelegantly and ineloquently she speaks I am shocked she was ever an attorney. Just looked it up, she went to a terrible law school. That makes a lot of sense. It's about the only place that would have let her practice law.
@@flightevolution8132 And you have to wonder if she was a DEI admission student or if she willie brown'ed her way in.
@@marcushoward6560 “She put her head down and got to work!” - Tim Walz
Let’s really be honest about this Peter
You have been wrong about the outcome of this election for 3 years straight
And not just a little bit wrong, you literally guaranteed the opposite of the actual result
Will you admit your error?
If not please don’t ever pretend to make any future predictions 5:45
Who. Cares. It's not his job to be accurate, its his job to give his professional opinion. He gave his 2 cents, take away what you will from it.
Not 2 cents
Utter full throated certainty with derision intimated in every syllable, for 3 years
He has to address his embarrassing failure or nothing he says holds any weight in the future
@@skywalkergreen9012 100%. His entire job is to make accurate predictions and he failed completely when it came to this election.
@@Decibel00288 Don't interact, it's a bot account.
@@skywalkergreen9012 Then go get your information from somewhere else. Christ, the entitlement is insane.
I remember the video from March/April 2024 when Peter said "Trump will not win because he CANNOT win and here's why...."
Inaccurate to say a former President has no experience with policy.
Everything he said about Trump and Vance was very inaccurate. Which is in shocking contrast with what he says about foreign countries.
Blah blah blah. Close the goddam border.
I thought trump was losing
Peety said Trump couldn't win. When emotion outweighs logic, you get Peter Zeihan.
So Trump's degradation was "on full display," yet I don't once recall Peter commenting on any mental degradation from Biden even once it became painfully obvious.
And this is why I am forced to take Peter with a big grain of salt, because he allows his personal politics to dramatically bias his analysis.
Just because you don't remember it doesn't mean Peter didn't say it. Because he actually said it in a video he made after the Trump-Biden debate.
@@agustintarzian9450 - Oh, forgive me then, if he did call it out only once it became painfully obvious to everyone. That clearly obviates my entire argument. Good job!
@@dhunter1133 fun fact yes what i have written obviates your entire argument. you say that peter never commented on biden's degeneration even when this was obvious and that this proved his bias.
And what you say is a lie, because Peter did comment on Biden's degeneration, and he has a video about it. And i can give you the link to the video if you don't want to believe me.
@@dhunter1133 fun fact yes what i have written obviates your entire argument. you say that peter never commented on biden's degeneration even when this was obvious and that this proved his bias. And what you say is a lie, because Peter did comment on Biden's degeneration, and he has a video about it. I can give you a link to the video if you don't want to believe me.
This is the factual and verifiable reality and if you don't like it or it bothers you, well, joke's on you pal
@dhunter1133 fun fact yes what i have written obviates your entire argument. you say that peter never commented on biden's degeneration even when this was obvious and that this proved his bias. But Peter did comment on Biden's degeneration, and he has a video about it. I can give you a link to the video if you don't want to believe me.
Zeihan's TDS undercuts any serious analysis he could give about the fellow. Zeihan stated Trump would be absolutely lose the 2024 election.
The TDS is strong in this one.
I love that Peter was wrong about the election. He was so absolutely sure that Trump would lose.
U said Trump wouldn’t win
The country will be led by the worst…God help the US
😂 that’s how you do it, man. Piss everyone off. Always appreciate your insights. Looking forward to it after the election.
I know. I love seeing both sides seethe
Remember when Peter told us Kamala would route the Republicans.