Why the need to “attack” the evangelical model? This is Adventisms problem. Its identity is always formed by arguing with another group, over and against their position. Just demonstrate a Biblical theology of the covenants there is no need to attack evangelicals in an attempt to demonstrate you are correct. 😂 Perhaps you are. But your reasons for doing what you are doing are wrong. Belittle and demean another Christian group. But…then again you have been doing this since 1844. 😢
Sooooo true! It’s really frustrating watching him try to fit Adventism into the Bible. OF COURSE there are elements of the Gospel, and New Covenant promises contained in the Law! How else could it be a Schoolmaster to lead us TO CHRIST?? But that doesn’t mean we are still under that Law, covenantally. Paul makes that abundantly clear.
Paul's theologies are little bit hard to interpret.
Only if you try to squeeze Adventism into his writings. Once you quit doing that; his writings become a breeze to interpret.
Why the need to “attack” the evangelical model? This is Adventisms problem. Its identity is always formed by arguing with another group, over and against their position.
Just demonstrate a Biblical theology of the covenants there is no need to attack evangelicals in an attempt to demonstrate you are correct. 😂 Perhaps you are. But your reasons for doing what you are doing are wrong. Belittle and demean another Christian group.
But…then again you have been doing this since 1844. 😢
Sooooo true! It’s really frustrating watching him try to fit Adventism into the Bible. OF COURSE there are elements of the Gospel, and New Covenant promises contained in the Law! How else could it be a Schoolmaster to lead us TO CHRIST?? But that doesn’t mean we are still under that Law, covenantally. Paul makes that abundantly clear.