@@holstonmatt Musicians aren't authors. It's very easy to disassociate music from the musicians because most songs are 3-4 minutes long and have many other talented people involved. It's very difficult to remove an author from a book, let alone a series of books. I'm not sure how anyone can read those books and take away that this author is this incredibly hateful person. The entire HP series is, when it boils down to it, about how love always wins. You don't get that sort of book series from a hateful person.
@@deathswitch2404 well have you read her tweets ? also there a lot of stuff wrong with Harry potter like the antisemitic goblins or how that one person try to save slaves and pretty much get shame for it, also you can't separate the context of society from a text for example the og invasion of the body snatchers was called anti communist by some and anti mccarthyism by others and both criticisms where valid because of the time the movie was made and release in, edit: it took me about 6 hours to realize that i said male instead of made 😆🙃
I’m beginning to feel like I woke up in a parallel universe ! Women having to clarify what they are and men demanding to be referred to as women…. What the FK is a SIS ?? I think I want to get off this ride 😔
But why has JK Rowling been harping on about trans people and trying to make it anti-women or say it's an insult to women if there are males who identify as female? This idea about trans people as predators is just prejudiced garbage. I wonder why she thinks it's okay to make her own very personal issues a problem for other people.
Of course it’s not fair all the back lash she’s getting. I think people just like having a go at her, maybe they are jealous or simply they are small minded & nasty.
"An individual's, deluded subjective "reality" does NOT trump actual, objective reality..": All you've done by saying "deluded" is inject your personal bias based on ignorance against Trans people.
Lets be clear for a moment: It isnt. 1. Its not an ideology. Its just people wanting to be themsevles. 2. How much have you had to debate your right to exist the way that you are? Why should anyone? 3. Your views arent new. The same was said about homosexuality. Eventually you lost.
@@thetransphobe. I identify as a person that isnt giving in to base predujices that we fought against from 1930-1945. I wonder if you lived back then what side you would have ended up on without the benefit of hindsight?
Jk is not anti trans. Not in the slightest. It’s a minority of those people who are so low in self esteem that they cannot find their own way of describing themselves. Those who rant about this and try to destroy real women are actually men - of the loudest sort and who try to intimidate women because they want to grab what we are. They are not what we are - they are something different entirely No one cares what people do with their private lives if they are not hurting anyone else. These people are demeaning women and trying to stamp them out to be replaced by themselves.
"These people are demeaning women and trying to stamp them out to be replaced by themselves.": This is just bizarre; even Rowling might be embarrassed to be supported by you...but sigh...maybe not.
*So this ''Nicole'' person says she should stick with writing about things that aren't real, but looool, is that not what she already does when she talks about the trans illusions and the nonsense that the Trans people believe is real? So, looool, in fact she does talk about that are not real, sooo why is this person complaining when she does write about things that are not real, why? It is really funny to say that. Contradictive girl.*
@@EdgarRavenTransmedTranssexual They are delusional, did not say they do not exist bcz they are people, but whatever. That person is a Boy and not a female, male only, so he should not have a female name.
This is the mess our society gets into when we have govt who do not think clearly and follow feelings instead of science and biological facts. To facilitate a trans person to be able to legally have documents altered to align with their feelings is naive and problematic.
@@peanutbutterbruv Totally irrelevant. George Orwell changed his name for professional purposes as a writer just as David Bowie changed his name as a musician from David Jones. A name change is totally different from a sec change. You have various Christian names that could be male or female like Kim, Alex or an actress called Leslie Ash ( should have strictly been Lesley)
Them: She has not said anything transphobic. Also them: I believe she's *really transphobic* and that is because of where she *MAY* be getting her education on the matter.
l think its rather amusing that J k Rowling only called herself J k Rowling because her publisher thought her books would sell better if people thought she was a man writing the books.
Whether you agree with him or disagree with him, Piers Morgan is awful, he comes across as so arrogant and conceited, all he seems to want to do is hear the sound of his own voice.
Well said J.k speaking the TRUTH
JK wrote Harry Potter
2nd most popular book in history
I’m on her side
And Wagner wrote some terrific music. That doesn't mean he was a "good" person". You can separate a person from what they produce or create.
yeah like how Kanye make really good music but he still antisemitic, just because someone make a famous thing don't mean they are a good person
Next to the Bible.
@@holstonmatt Musicians aren't authors. It's very easy to disassociate music from the musicians because most songs are 3-4 minutes long and have many other talented people involved. It's very difficult to remove an author from a book, let alone a series of books. I'm not sure how anyone can read those books and take away that this author is this incredibly hateful person. The entire HP series is, when it boils down to it, about how love always wins. You don't get that sort of book series from a hateful person.
@@deathswitch2404 well have you read her tweets ? also there a lot of stuff wrong with Harry potter like the antisemitic goblins or how that one person try to save slaves and pretty much get shame for it, also you can't separate the context of society from a text for example the og invasion of the body snatchers was called anti communist by some and anti mccarthyism by others and both criticisms where valid because of the time the movie was made and release in, edit: it took me about 6 hours to realize that i said male instead of made 😆🙃
I’m beginning to feel like I woke up in a parallel universe ! Women having to clarify what they are and men demanding to be referred to as women…. What the FK is a SIS ?? I think I want to get off this ride 😔
I guess you wouldn't mind if women demand to be referred to as men?
@@peterfraser9070 actually, I would mind. You can put on a facade but you can’t insist other people believe join you in your “make believe” world.
@@peterfraser9070They don't, their lives get threatened online just for being feminist.
@@unowen-nh9ov who's making death threats just because someone is a feminist?
But why has JK Rowling been harping on about trans people and trying to make it anti-women or say it's an insult to women if there are males who identify as female? This idea about trans people as predators is just prejudiced garbage. I wonder why she thinks it's okay to make her own very personal issues a problem for other people.
Of course it’s not fair all the back lash she’s getting. I think people just like having a go at her, maybe they are jealous or simply they are small minded & nasty.
Her podcast calling it a 🧙♀️ hunt is totally accurate.
An individual's, deluded subjective "reality" does NOT trump actual, objective reality..
"An individual's, deluded subjective "reality" does NOT trump actual, objective reality..": All you've done by saying "deluded" is inject your personal bias based on ignorance against Trans people.
@@peterfraser9070 It's not "personal bias", it's a perfectly apt descriptor. Deluded simply means 'to hold a false belief'. It just is what it is..
Of course it's not fair.
This video was 3 years ago, the tide is now starting to turn on this mad ideology at last.
Lets be clear for a moment: It isnt. 1. Its not an ideology. Its just people wanting to be themsevles. 2. How much have you had to debate your right to exist the way that you are? Why should anyone? 3. Your views arent new. The same was said about homosexuality. Eventually you lost.
@@TwistedHorizonI20bully
@@sharlenemckenzie9688 thats rich
@@TwistedHorizonI20what do u identify as delusional person?
@@thetransphobe. I identify as a person that isnt giving in to base predujices that we fought against from 1930-1945. I wonder if you lived back then what side you would have ended up on without the benefit of hindsight?
Jk and Kathleen Stock two Strong Women .
Kathleen Stock. What a woman 🙌
She's a person. Don't say woman. We are people.
@@johnmulligan455 collectively we are people, she wasn't referring to a collective, she was referring to an individual that is female..
@@StuartGrant-fm6ti male
She speaks for a lot of women.
Rowling speaks for the non-dysphoric population.
She speaks of us common sense people who refuse to bow to the trans activist cancel culture.
Jk is not anti trans. Not in the slightest. It’s a minority of those people who are so low in self esteem that they cannot find their own way of describing themselves. Those who rant about this and try to destroy real women are actually men - of the loudest sort and who try to intimidate women because they want to grab what we are. They are not what we are - they are something different entirely No one cares what people do with their private lives if they are not hurting anyone else. These people are demeaning women and trying to stamp them out to be replaced by themselves.
Yes she is and so are you.
She is. That doesn’t mean she should be cancelled, but your take on this is deluded.
What is bad about being Anti trans?
Trans is a bad thing by all means.
So being against it would be moral.
"These people are demeaning women and trying to stamp them out to be replaced by themselves.": This is just bizarre; even Rowling might be embarrassed to be supported by you...but sigh...maybe not.
@@nealeduncan5197 No she isn't but you are anti common sense.
JK Rowling is smart and talented.
*So this ''Nicole'' person says she should stick with writing about things that aren't real, but looool, is that not what she already does when she talks about the trans illusions and the nonsense that the Trans people believe is real? So, looool, in fact she does talk about that are not real, sooo why is this person complaining when she does write about things that are not real, why? It is really funny to say that. Contradictive girl.*
Nicole is a transwoman
Trans ppl do exist.
@@EdgarRavenTransmedTranssexual
They are delusional, did not say they do not exist bcz they are people, but whatever.
That person is a Boy and not a female, male only, so he should not have a female name.
Where did Nicole say that? That isn’t in this video.
This is the mess our society gets into when we have govt who do not think clearly and follow feelings instead of science and biological facts. To facilitate a trans person to be able to legally have documents altered to align with their feelings is naive and problematic.
These debates are basically about people who prefer unnatural sex
Fairly reasonable debate but who in hell knows what the term “clownfish” (?) means which India says?
It's jonothan not India
@@CJRJ73 Its India not Johnathan
People can't change sex but can change their names. Do you call George Orwell Eric Blair?
@@peanutbutterbruv Totally irrelevant. George Orwell changed his name for professional purposes as a writer just as David Bowie changed his name as a musician from David Jones. A name change is totally different from a sec change. You have various Christian names that could be male or female like Kim, Alex or an actress called Leslie Ash ( should have strictly been Lesley)
If all transgender people were as honest and sensible as Nicole Gibson, the world would be the better for it.
Yes. The days where people transitioned and paid no mind to anything, needs to come back.
Yes we wouldn't be talking about it at all if they were like her. A breath of fresh air. I bet she has never complained about pronouns.
Piers: "Let me make this about me getting criticized for my political views and feeling butthurt about it."
Them: She has not said anything transphobic.
Also them: I believe she's *really transphobic* and that is because of where she *MAY* be getting her education on the matter.
We all know JK Rowling is right
the bachlash is fair they pushed this WAY too hard now its coming back to haunt them . go poltergiests
Shhhh Johnathon, stop with the mansplaining mate. Geez.
l think its rather amusing that J k Rowling only called herself J k Rowling because her publisher thought her books would sell better if people thought she was a man writing the books.
Whether you agree with him or disagree with him, Piers Morgan is awful, he comes across as so arrogant and conceited, all he seems to want to do is hear the sound of his own voice.
And who is forcing you to watch him????????
JK write in make-believe . She lives in Reality !
Some good points made here reasonably discussing absurdity. Piers Morgan, half man-half tabloid, though.
Clown fish that sounds right
Yes
And India has now said about JK Rowling - "I'm more of a woman than jk Rowling will ever be"...🚩
Fair
What about ppl who M but identify as a man?
What backlash? All sane people agree with her.
You compare yourself to Clownfish, ridiculous
Calling Jk Rowling transohonic by a Misogynistic man is a paradox....😊
Jk has my vote everytime.
Me back JK all the way
I suddenly have more respect for Rowling, she is a hero speaking out against the sick people and the fascist govt that supports their nonsense.
Im with JK, she tells the truth.🥰
Mister Will nobody get a life MAN