Hello, I have never tried it so far. But what you can do is use a series of interconnected RGibbs (maybe 5 or 6 block) and enter feed into reactor 1 and another feed enter at reactor 5 (or six). Maybe this link help. Hope I answer your question books.google.com.my/books?id=WDVldP9YUPkC&pg=PA254&lpg=PA254&dq=counter+current+reactor+aspen&source=bl&ots=zd3Y55KuLR&sig=ACfU3U0qFIxXSPDtjH48BVut5Uhi8SBCXg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjmicHW64PqAhV1muYKHRsbDJYQ6AEwCXoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=counter%20current%20reactor%20aspen&f=false
@@jabatankejuruteraankimiada4612 Thank you for your response. Basically, I was asking this due to that reference and I cannot change it to a counter-current reactor.
@@LeakIrengNow that I think about it, you might be right..ok then, how about you put component separator in between the RGIBBS to separate the species (output of RGIBBS) prior entering the next block..?
@@MohamadReziAbdulHamid Nope, it doesn't work. I tried it and the RGIBBS can only receive input as cocurrent (1 side only). [It seems that I misinterpreting the reference. In a series of RGIBBS, output from the next reactor can be used as input for previous reactor. That, will make it as countercurrent.]
Hi, Can you share all the PDFs used in the video? It would be extremely helpful for me.
You may use this link to download the books (www.pdfdrive.com/)
For reference/journal use may use sci-hub website
Hi, do you understand how to set up RGIBBS reactor as counter-current reactor?
Hello, I have never tried it so far. But what you can do is use a series of interconnected RGibbs (maybe 5 or 6 block) and enter feed into reactor 1 and another feed enter at reactor 5 (or six). Maybe this link help. Hope I answer your question
books.google.com.my/books?id=WDVldP9YUPkC&pg=PA254&lpg=PA254&dq=counter+current+reactor+aspen&source=bl&ots=zd3Y55KuLR&sig=ACfU3U0qFIxXSPDtjH48BVut5Uhi8SBCXg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjmicHW64PqAhV1muYKHRsbDJYQ6AEwCXoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=counter%20current%20reactor%20aspen&f=false
@@jabatankejuruteraankimiada4612 Thank you for your response. Basically, I was asking this due to that reference and I cannot change it to a counter-current reactor.
@@LeakIrengNow that I think about it, you might be right..ok then, how about you put component separator in between the RGIBBS to separate the species (output of RGIBBS) prior entering the next block..?
@@MohamadReziAbdulHamid Nope, it doesn't work. I tried it and the RGIBBS can only receive input as cocurrent (1 side only).
[It seems that I misinterpreting the reference. In a series of RGIBBS, output from the next reactor can be used as input for previous reactor. That, will make it as countercurrent.]