I think film critics in 10 years will come back and hail it as one of the great films of all time. I just watched it for a third time and the first two times it went over my head. It's really an incredible film.
A legendary masterpiece. Sadly overlooked because just below the surface it lies an abstract and universal search for human essence meaning, as big food for thought as 2001 Space odissey... A hermetic film that needs to be watched many times, with narrative and symbolic layers, it's not a simple movie about a cult and a troubled man that admires a Master. For me the biggest and most surprising film of this century.
i remember bumping up with this movies trailer, and i couldnt stop watching it until the movie came out, than i could never stop watching the movie, every once in a while i end up watching this masterpiece, thank PTA and all the crew and cast for doing one of the best movie of all time !
Generally I trust IMDB because they seem to give everything the ratings they deserve but they can also be pretty off. I'v recently been super put off by seeing films like Deadpool or Avengers get a rating as good as 8.1, when there's masterpieces like this or The Social Network that get lower than that. And I just generally don't even bother with Rotten Tomatoes, they're just off on everything
Metacritic is the one I prefer, it's the most accurate most of the times. IMDb is what the general audience thinks, that's why this kind of movies don't get what they deserve. And rotten tomatoes is definitely the worst!, if all they top critics give the movie a 6/10 it'll get a 100%,that's why so many movies get high ratings
iCrackediTTv Well, its a more entertaining film, thats for sure, it is catchy, easy to digest and you fall in love with the characters quite quick, thats the kind of film it is, something like boogie nights.
Wow, he was a bit offended by the first question it seems. ALTHOUGH, I completely understand where Paul is coming from, he must be so sick of people thinking that this is a "Scientology" movie, that it's a "Cult" film...nonononooo...this is about a broken man after the war, a very lonely man that finds a the best love he's had since Doris, Lancaster. I really feel that this is mostly a film about a man battling himself, or at least someone that very much so reminds them of himself
When you put two giants in front of one camera the last thing I need is a plot so, yes. I'm going to watch this tonight for the first time and yes, I am going to re-watch it about 200 times until the end of the year. I will not rest until I study every single frame. And that's a promise.
in my opinion she was looking at freddie(he was drunk during the roving dance)and maybe the camera was from freddie's perspective also because they were all naked because freddie has got lust problem ah english isn't my first language so in case of error, sorry
I find PTA rolling his eyes when asked about Scientology and this movie really annoying. Anyone who's read Bare Faced Messiah cannot help but see that this is OBVIOUSLY inspired by L Ron Hubbard's life. 'Inspired' might be too loose a word, it's a direct adaptation. I get that you don't want all the garbage that Scientology will subject you to but it's a bit cowardly to make this film and then roll your eyes at people wanting to know about that.
nobody gets it,read a lot of things on this movie and nobody gets it.Joaquin is Philips subconscious.his id if you like.i've said it before,here it is again.the first time I saw it it troubled me.I slept on it and as often happens I woke with an epiphany.the characters mirror each other.a symbiosis.the script and the acting were superb and I can't say enough about pta.....
You could've shared your analysis of the film without insulting other people's intelligence by stating that "nobody gets it." I got it, without your help. So, good for you for figuring it out, but others did too, so, being humble would only do you good, I promise. Because I, personally, learn best from people who wants to share with me, not lecture me. Just a tip.
You´re not right and neither do I because a film It´s open to interpretation. We are both correct in our analysis so don´t come with that petulant attitude
I honestly think that this movie is a masterpiece.
Absolutely! This movie freaked me out.
I think film critics in 10 years will come back and hail it as one of the great films of all time. I just watched it for a third time and the first two times it went over my head. It's really an incredible film.
Youre not alone ;)
@@EricAndradeMusic they haven't. It's too experimental. Not saying it's not an intriguing movie.
@@EricAndradeMusic you are completely right :)
A legendary masterpiece. Sadly overlooked because just below the surface it lies an abstract and universal search for human essence meaning, as big food for thought as 2001 Space odissey... A hermetic film that needs to be watched many times, with narrative and symbolic layers, it's not a simple movie about a cult and a troubled man that admires a Master. For me the biggest and most surprising film of this century.
you get it :)
To be fair it was nominated for three Oscars - I'm not sure that counts as overlooked. I agree that it's one of the finest films of the century!
i remember bumping up with this movies trailer, and i couldnt stop watching it until the movie came out, than i could never stop watching the movie, every once in a while i end up watching this masterpiece, thank PTA and all the crew and cast for doing one of the best movie of all time !
this film holds a special place in my heart and soul forever timeless and beautiful art which transcends the spirit.
Reasons i stopped using imdb. they rated this movie 7.10.
guardians of the galaxy 8.10..... come on
i stopped using rotten tomatoes after they rated How to train your dragon 2 with 100% and Alien with %99
Generally I trust IMDB because they seem to give everything the ratings they deserve but they can also be pretty off. I'v recently been super put off by seeing films like Deadpool or Avengers get a rating as good as 8.1, when there's masterpieces like this or The Social Network that get lower than that.
And I just generally don't even bother with Rotten Tomatoes, they're just off on everything
Metacritic is the one I prefer, it's the most accurate most of the times.
IMDb is what the general audience thinks, that's why this kind of movies don't get what they deserve.
And rotten tomatoes is definitely the worst!, if all they top critics give the movie a 6/10 it'll get a 100%,that's why so many movies get high ratings
iCrackediTTv Well, its a more entertaining film, thats for sure, it is catchy, easy to digest and you fall in love with the characters quite quick, thats the kind of film it is, something like boogie nights.
guardians of the galaxy is a great movie btw
I can't get over how pretty Amy Adams is. I'm kicking myself now "aahh why didn't I go to TIFF in 2012!?!?"
Wow, he was a bit offended by the first question it seems. ALTHOUGH, I completely understand where Paul is coming from, he must be so sick of people thinking that this is a "Scientology" movie, that it's a "Cult" film...nonononooo...this is about a broken man after the war, a very lonely man that finds a the best love he's had since Doris, Lancaster. I really feel that this is mostly a film about a man battling himself, or at least someone that very much so reminds them of himself
When you put two giants in front of one camera the last thing I need is a plot so, yes. I'm going to watch this tonight for the first time and yes, I am going to re-watch it about 200 times until the end of the year. I will not rest until I study every single frame. And that's a promise.
Did you watch it 200 times?
are you still in brooklyn?
Can we all stop for a minute and appreciate Amy Adams' beauty? Golly, she is a real humdinger.
I don't know anybody who doesn't appreciate Amy's beauty of body, mind, and spirit.
P.T.ANDERSON--LIVING LEGEND!!!!
best movie of all time !!
Hilarious is that a nod to Das Racist at 7:35? New respect goes to this dude.
The Master is a masterpiece, as is There Will Be Blood.
does anyone remember the ROVING scene and how Peggy is glaring right at the camera, what the fuck is that?
in my opinion she was looking at freddie(he was drunk during the roving dance)and maybe the camera was from freddie's perspective
also because they were all naked because freddie has got lust problem
ah english isn't my first language so in case of error, sorry
Aiman Ennaji oh right
The Master is about socialism and capitalism having created the universe together so as to help each other survive
Thomas H Cullen “socialism and capitalism having created the universe together” lol you eat too much of ur hullshit
No... its not about that
5:15
Who's the woman with the black hair?
that's pta's producer. forgot her name, but she produced magnolia, punch drunk love, and i believe boogie nights and there will be blood as well
JoAnne Sellar
Also phantom thread, she's going to work on every movie forward she's officially part of his team
I find PTA rolling his eyes when asked about Scientology and this movie really annoying. Anyone who's read Bare Faced Messiah cannot help but see that this is OBVIOUSLY inspired by L Ron Hubbard's life. 'Inspired' might be too loose a word, it's a direct adaptation. I get that you don't want all the garbage that Scientology will subject you to but it's a bit cowardly to make this film and then roll your eyes at people wanting to know about that.
I trully fucking hate trailers... "what are you running from?" Shows him running.
" he is dangerous " shows him fighting the cops.
GTFOH
nobody gets it,read a lot of things on this movie and nobody gets it.Joaquin is Philips subconscious.his id if you like.i've said it before,here it is again.the first time I saw it it troubled me.I slept on it and as often happens I woke with an epiphany.the characters mirror each other.a symbiosis.the script and the acting were superb and I can't say enough about pta.....
+Jack Bateman I got it the first time around. I saw other "analyses" were people were differentiating the two as if they were different people.
Could you elaborate on this?
You could've shared your analysis of the film without insulting other people's intelligence by stating that "nobody gets it." I got it, without your help. So, good for you for figuring it out, but others did too, so, being humble would only do you good, I promise. Because I, personally, learn best from people who wants to share with me, not lecture me. Just a tip.
You´re not right and neither do I because a film It´s open to interpretation. We are both correct in our analysis so don´t come with that petulant attitude
Scenery chew off
I dont think you know what scenery chewing is
I didn't appreciate the female nudity. It gets old real quick.