I'm always enjoying your "down to earth" approach on so called "must haves" (4K etc.) on camcorders nowadays...facing reality and today's standards, great. Keep going!
I tried to buy this in Montreal where I live. To my surprise, I was told to wait for the NX-80. I explained to the retailer my inexperience and he immediately informed me the AF was extremely sluggish on this Cam. He quipped that based on my lack of experience would demand that AF should be a priority until I mastered the camera. I appreciated his input, as I did yours. You are clearly an expert that probably never uses AF. Who knows, maybe a NX-200 is on the way in the not too distant future. I've never experienced a salesman practically begging me not to buy a product. He was a pro and owned one himself and like you, had nothing but praise for it otherwise.
I have heard that the autofocus on the new NX80 is substantially better than these older models, yes, though I have not been able to test it. As a beginner, it may well be that you like to use AF but at the same time, I have always found autofocuses to not be 100% reliable - after all, they can only guess which bit of the image you want to be in focus. The NX80 is certainly more modern but it doesn't have such an extensive set of manual controls so whether it's right for you depends on what you want to do . I agree, an NX200 with the features of the NX80 in the NX100 body would be great.
nice review i ended up buying a pxw-x70 sony i got 4k upgraded, but the bad things is it wont display image at the HDMI port at the same time i record 4k it does live monitoring but just in 1080p do you know any camera in 4k that can do that?? for less 2000$ us dollar?
Offhand, at that price, I can't think of any. You've got the JVCHM170/200 which I wasn't a huge fan of, there's a Panasonic (not the DVX200, another one whose model number escapes me) and the Sony. Unfortunately I've no idea if they permit 4K monitoring. I presume they tend not to because it requires processor power to create the signal and in the low cost camcorders, the processor is busy doing the encoding and not much else!!
Excellent review. 22 minutes of densely packed, extremely valuable and practical information. What is more: delivered to camera logically, faultlessly without a “hum or errrr”, pause or fluff, gee whiz or hiccup. How do you do it? You do not seem to have any idiot prompt cards. Congratulations on a very accomplished and useful piece of work. (your valuable comments on 4K storage and processing requirements are well taken by the way) Many thanks.
+UKAirscape "um err jee whiz that is just awesome err " Once more many thanks for your excellent reviews (and growing library) and as the ancient sage from Yorkshire says " long may your despatches from the long boat on the cut continue" (-:
I have to say after watching your review of this camera a few weeks ago, I decided to go to B&H photo to research what other options and features, prices and so on that were out there. That being said, I can't find anything that measures up to this for price, picture quality and such. I asked other buyers on RUclips on their thoughts as well and they all seemed very satisfied. I know, that's exactly what you said in essence in your review. Finally, I believe Sony will sell quite a few of these and have you to thank for it.
Hi, I have finally purchased the HXR NX 100 and I must say: fantastic camera! Thanky ou very much for your review, which helped me a lot to go for it. Two Informations: 1) I have purchased at Sony service the lens-hood for the 4k model PXW-Z150. This hood has the built in mechanic with two lids which close the hood with a pleasant "click" and protect the lens. It fits perfectly to the HXR NX 100, and even an 62mm UV filter attached onto the Lens is not a problem. 2) I do not observe the rainbow efect in the EVF, which you've reported about. Maybe they have fixed it. The picture in the evf is quite small, but ok. The three rings on the objective work perfektly smooth and responsive. I really like the camera. Best regards from Austria!
+Nik Zuhause That tip about the lens hood is excellent! Great idea. As for point 2, I've had several people since say that their camera viewfinders are fine so it must have been a fault or early issue on the test model I was sent (either that or there's something wrong with my eyes, which is also possible!)
Many thanks for this and all your videos from this and your other channels. Nice to have someone actually have a non-bias "REVIEW" of something, rather than just say "it's crap don't buy it" or "if you don't buy this you're an idiot". Also, no distracting music, effects or the new "alternate angle" shot of seeing the host talking to the camera. I'm sorry, but if someone is talking to me I want to see their face, not the back of their head. If someone is going to spend any money on anything, they need as much info that they can get. No distractions. These videos have "no BS" and to the point with no "faffing about". Sorry for the mini-rant, but there you go. We purchased an HXR-MC88 (yes, not 4K) for our church webcasts primarily for use on an bescor MP101 remote head. If it is still available when we can afford another camera, I think the NX100 would be a great fit for handheld or tripod use to match along with. We picked the MC88 over the consumer 4K's cams for the full-size HDMI and the prosumer features and firmware. Only thing I don't like about this one is the BNC not being HD-SDI. I guess it was easier to use that instead of having a stereo mini jack for it. Just a lot of wasted space for most people, although there seems to still be a market for SD somewhere.
For the price, that is a lot of rather good camera. I am still very happy with my FDR-AXP33 and I don't film yet at 4K. I set my camcorder to record 1080 at 50 and it is a stunning picture. 4K is the future and of course there will be even more impressive standards after that but 1080 is good enough for most people right now. I really enjoyed your review (as I always do enjoy your videos). Thanks for introducing me to a new model on the marketplace. All the best.
+Aaron's allotment I too am still using the AXP33 - indeed this review was filmed on it, in 4K mode so as to get those cropped in cutaway shots - and find it a very useful point-and--shoot. I quite fancy getting the just-announced updated version, the AX53 though, for a better sensor, longer zoom and 100fps slowmo (120 on NTSC country cameras)
Hi, could you please spend some words about: 1) The quality of the image stabiliser of this camera? 2) The zoom speed? Can it make creeping zoom? Does ist start and stop the zoom smoothly? 3) Could you please compare the camera regarding the points above against the PXW 70? 4) Would you recommend it rather the PXW 70 for somebody, who does not need 4K? 5) The view finder is obviously poor, but still: can it be used outside, or would you categorise it as unusable? 6) Is the weight of the camera not too high, when filming without a tripod? 7) what is the "feeling" regarding the body- dose it feel too plasticky, or rather solid? 8) do the buttons have a solid switching point? Thank you very much in advance! Nikola
+Nik Zuhause 1. Image stabilisation has two modes, standard and active. Standard is like a basic camcorder. Active is much better but crops the image a fraction. Neither mode is as good as the BOSS system used on Sony's consumer cams, and nothing like a motorised gimbal. 2. You can do a creeping zoom, best if you use a remote LANC controller though. 3. I can't compare against the X70 as I don't have one (I merely borrowed one for review at the time) 4. Can't say. They're different types of unit. The X70 is smaller and easy to take around, it also has things like HD-SDI output as I recall. But it's more expensive. So it depends what you want and what you need. 5. I talked about that in the video. 6. Weight is fine 7. A bit plasticky but not as bad as a JVC GY-HM170 8. Not really
Well said. This is the best, most practical review I have heard of any camera in a long. Glad you saw past the 4K silliness. 99% of the time you could make money with the cam it seems to me.
Excellent review - very useful - I'm very much an entry level amateur and based on your thoughts bought one of these for a project that involving a lot of "unfolding event" field shooting as well as office interviews. Very happy with it.
An Amazon review mentioned there was an internal menu where you could get 1080 from the BNC output; is that true in a firmware update or such since your review was posted, or (as usual) do Amazon reviews tend to not be accurate?
Fantastic review! I have this camera for about three weeks now and I'm rather satisfied with it. I totally agree with you about the 4K debate, although I would like to have an upgrade soon. Another annoying thing is that I cannot access the menu when I'm looking through the viewfinder.
Love your reviews. The reason why I have a low light obsession!! Is 99% of my filming is fireworks. So I would like reviewers to add more low light reviews :) I use this camera and the FDR-AX100 for the 4K.
+SpawnAgainFireworks Ah but it's not really low is it, becuase the fireworks themselves are bright! So if you turn the exposure to be correct for the fireworks, the dark areas should be so dim that the noise is masked anyway, surely?
+UKAirscape Thanks for the reply, unfortunately I am an amateur in filming so I have to rely on the camera to do all of the work! And with fireworks you only get one chance to get it right! And I think that the two cameras that I have really do a good job of focusing and colours, on firework mode!
do you like this better than a canon XA 50? Does this offer live streaming? I know there is no sdi, but many are complaining about the HDMI output, any idea what the complaints are about?
The 'G' in Sony's 'G lenses' stands for 'Gold Standard'. I gleaned that piece of information from one of Sony's lens catalogues here in Japan. I agree with your views on this NX100 and it is a very valid camera as it is. If you have a radio mic stuck on top of that camera and want to close the monitor to use the viewfinder - good luck. Sony would do well to take a leaf out of Panasonic's book and have a monitor that slides in without having to remove any accessory you may have in the shoe. A small gripe that I have about the MI Shoe is that the travel is far too short (rails too short) and I have found that accessories such as lights and wireless receivers tend to pop out in real life situations so you have to clamp them down much harder than usual. I understand that on cameras like the A7 series for example, that there is simply not enough space, but on my FS7 there is ample space and the secondary accessory shoe at the rear is longer!! Please Sony, make the rails a little longer to accommodate non-MI accessories (these lock into place and are no issue).
Crumbs, I hadn't even considered the MI accessories getting in the way of the screen shutting; good point! Do the MI accessories not screw onto the shoe to hold them tight, like a normal shoe accessory would? I've never actually tried any.
The MI accessories are designed to slot in and fit in properly, They are not the issue. The issue arises (and occasionally arises I might add) when you use non-MI accessories which have a square foot that prevents them from being fully inserted. This means that a small portion hangs out at the end. This seems to be enough for the accessory to work loose and suddenly pop out in use. Obviously, tripod use is not an issue, but when running and gunning, it does happen. In my latest news item on 'Shopping in Japan' my Sony wireless (not the latest MI compatible version) came loose and was hanging freely in the crowd as I progressed down the street. In these conditions it is both dangerous to passers by as well as an inconvenience.
The only downside I see to it is that it doesn't record 4:2:2 subsampling (do you know if it outputs uncompressed 4:2:2 via HDMI?) and has a shortish optical zoom and the clear image zoom doesn't always look as good as optical does (Would you be able to show a sample of the clear image zoom?). Also from what you said about the viewfinder, that isn't so good, but it does look like a good prosumer camcorder. From your videos from the camcorder, they look just slightly on the dull side (not bright enough), but not bad quality though. The low light gain looks very good, and defiantly as you said, much better than the XF200. Your right about 4K, especially if your shooting for television as its not necessary yet since many stations still broadcast in SD. I know its good to have 4K on a camera, but its not always necessary to use it. I am getting a Panasonic GH4 soon, which can record up to 4K resolution and although the 4K does look very good, I am going to record in 1920x1080 for now since I have an Atomos Ninja 2 recorder and will be better off using it and getting the 4:2:2 10-bit from HDMI rather than internal 4:2:0 8-bit. Even if the internal 4K would have more pixels than the Ninja 2 video, the Ninja 2 would be better to use as it will give me a better codec, more subsampling, 10-bit color and unrestricted record time, not limited to 29 minutes per video.
I did show the Clear Image Zoom, you weren't paying attention!! ;-) Go and watch again! Not sure about the HDMI out, sorry. Best to check the manual maybe which can be found online. I'll drop a note to Sony's PR firm who lent me the cam as well and ask them to find out.
I'd just like to add my thanks for the great review. All the sorts of geeky but none-the-less important questions covered. I was saving for the AX53 which does look like a lovely grab and go camcorder. But I just know that I'm going to want manual control. Since I've been thinking more seriously about video production, I can see just how often focusing is used to move the viewer's eye from the front of the scene and back. or just to blur one or the other in order provide a backdrop or foreground frame for the subject. It's used ALL the time! So built in NDs, manual iris and focus control are really important. I'm on a tight budget and this seems to hit the spot. If you know of anything else coming up in the next few months in the £1300ish range which is worth waiting for, let me know! Again, thank you for taking the time to research, film, edit and share your expertise.
The AX53 does have manual focus. It's the exposure that's a bit of a pain. No ND, alas. Do you need 4K or will HD suffice? If shallow DoF is critical to you, a large-sensor DSLR may be more appropriate than a camcorder.
Hi. Shallow DOF is important to me but so's the autofocus performance when that's required. I have a 7D but shooting video on the run is a dreadful experience. 4K isn't a necessity. The AX53 has manual but not at the same time as IRIS. The BOS looks amazing and that's a tempting feature on it's own but the lack of manual control over IRIS and Focus at the same time is a problem. I've got a few months before taking the plunge so will stay tuned to your channel for anything else coming up early in the New Year. Thanks again for the reviews :D
Agreed, almost no small consumer cams have separate controls for focus and exposure although Canon's HF-G40 does (the iris being via a small dial on the side). In fact, this cam would be the compact run-and-gun you need. If you need XLR audio, there's the XA30 which is exactly the same unit but with an audio handle. Neither will do you shallow DoF without a great deal of effort - they've got tiny sensors - but that's what makes them good for ENG style shooting. Stabilisation is decent but not as good as Sony's BOSS (nothing is!)
I enjoyed the review very much. One thing I would add as a side comment... is that in the comparison shot with the canon... there was A LOT more detail in the canon camera... so there is a lot of processing being done in the sony's camera to omit the noise. That being said... I'm a fan of this camera too and I just ordered it.
Your jacket looks 'ironed' on the sony side... you could see the wrinkles on the canon side... also some of the wood pattern is more visible on the canon side. Take a look... or is it a youtube compression thing?
I really enjoyed your review of this camera. I was wondering what the catches were and I have them. I live in Canada, our dollar is collapsing, this camcorder is going up in price 20 U.S. fucking dollars everyday! Thank you. How is the build quality BTW?
Excellent review. I've been looking into an HD camcorder at the pro entry level after owning a Sony VX2100 Mini-DV camcorder which was great in its time. This camcorder is very similar in its design. I did order mine today and will have it in just 2 days. I do have two extra batteries from the previous Sony camcorder so the backup power supply is all ready to go. Thanks again for the great review!!
Many thanks for this review. Much appreciated. I hope Sony is listening to your feedback, esp. wrt improving the EVF, which I think is essential for RnG.
I'm not actually sure that it's the exact same sensor but certainly very similar I think. I haven't done a side by side comparison of all three simultaneously so can't really answer the question. If you're not shooting 4K then the AX100 *is* the same as the CX900 though, I believe there's no other difference as I recall.
UKAirscape I do social events, I think people might consider the CX900 as amateur work. Im 90% leaning towards the nx100 Your review was comprehensive.
I'm curious how this camera check when shooting weddings . Especially in the church , where it is dark. Often in the wedding hall they are turned off all the lights . Only light music band . Please say something about this. Thank you.
I would say that - for the price - it copes with dimly lit situations better than any competitor. But no camera deals very well in the dark because sensors need light to operate.
My NX100 goes abruptly between each dB step (9dB, 12dB, 15 dB, etc.). If dB is set on auto and I change the iris, the gain changes smoothly, so I think the camera is able to do that. On an older camera, the Sony Z5 for example, there is an option in the menu for smooth transition between each dB step, but I can't find that option on the NX100. Please help me: How do you smoothly transition between each dB step? Thank you!
This looks like an excellent value and a great video camera for some starting a live event shooting business. It makes me cringe when I think about the price and the quality of the cameras I used when I got started. Gerry in Calgary.
It's achievable with a bit of zoom and a bit of effort but it's not DSLR like. The lens is only f2.8 at the wide end and then it ramps as you zoom so in one sense you're decreasing DoF by zooming but contradicting that by the lens ramping! I think I had a couple of examples of focus pulling in the video which demonstrate.
Fantastic review as always. You're always so extensive with the info you give, superb. This is quite similar to the AC90 that I'm using - seems like a bit of a bargain at the price too. I'll be moving to the AG-DVX 200 very soon for 4K support, cannot wait. Do you have any plans to review this? Would love to hear your take on it.
Marvelous! I wonder..... need SLOW zoom (variable maybe?) and remote control functions (zoom, focus, etc) can it handle? Wonderful review....thank you!!!
The zoom is variable. I did all mine on a Manfrotto LANC controller. Not sure about remote focus, I've never liked trying to focus on a handle control.
I talked about the auto white balance in the review but additionally, ever single sample shot was on auto WB. I've always found this level of Sony camcorder does it superbly (my Z5 was great too) though the PMW200 oddly wasn't as good. Didn't try autofocus, I try never to use it.
Hi, regarding the zoom rocker, I believe, it has been said, that it has several speeds? Does the speed vary in dependancy of the pressure force on the rocker (which I would expect)? Is the speed in that case changing gradually in an "analog way" if you increase the pressure or rather abruptly switching between few speeds? If abruptly: how many speeds are provided? What I would prefer, is that you can make a gentle transition from zero to some moderate speed, not like stop-and -go .
I didn't test the rocker to that degree of accuracy! As I recall, it was pressure sensitive. I prefer to use a remote controller on the tripod bar and that had the usual degree of sensitivity according to pressure, you could do a creeping zoom or a fast(ish) one.
Thank you for your video, great insight. I have been thinking of event coverage on my videos and I was wondering if such camcorder would be good? Or should I stick with my DSLR with a lens of low f-stop? Would be nice to get some opinions on the comments. Thank you!
Covering events with a DSLR can be a nightmare because with people moving around (including yourself), trying to get quick, accurate focus can be troublesome due to the DSLR's shallow depth of field. Granted it will look "prettier" but you may have fewer useable shots. For ENG use I would always rather use a camcorder but you'll find many DSLR devotees who would disagree with me. Also, is audio important to you at the events? Any interviews? DSLR audio can be a minefield and end up loading you up with extra kit. The all-in-one nature of a camcorder makes it ultra compact for moving around at events.
Hi.I was watching carefully your review and i find it very complete, impartial, and informative.I have a Sony HDR - AX2000 (much like the NX5) and i have not found on the internet any comparation of the image quality between the NX100 and the AX2000 or the NX5.How do you compare the image quality of a single 1" sensor with the older 3x1/3 sensors?can you get a comparation between the NX100 and the AX2000 or NX5?Thanks.
Very good review, I want that camera but the eye piece is very important for me outside. It looks very tiny 0.24? The one I have on my standard def. Vx2100 is 0.44 and is pretty good..
I just purchased this camera and so far I am loving it. Defiantly a image quality and operational step up in most aspects from my old sony hvr-zu1. For the price you cant beat this camera. All the options are there but you might have to dig for some of them. I also purchased a shoulder rig and I am looking for a good lanc remote for a decent price. Any suggestions that will work with the NX100?
So I almost have my money saved up and hope to be getting my first pro-level camcorder to go with my Canon 5d Mk 3 with prime lens set up. This is the second time watching this review. What is a step up from this but still close to it in price? And do you think Sony will announce a NX200 anytime soon ? Thanks again great job
They only just released this one so I doubt it. Next step maybe Panasonic's new HC-X1 but it's not even out yet so I can't say for sure. Specs look good though.
Hello, nice review! One question are the active stabilization lets say a 5 axis stabilization? Because at most cameras with active stabilizer the up and down movement its ok but left and right seems that dont stabilize at all. I used yesterday a pxw-x70 and it seemed to stabilize very well left and right movements.
Hi, comparing the fresh stabilisation tests fo the NX100 with those of the X70 you have done some time before, I have the impression, like if the X70 stabilisation were slightly better. Can you confirm it? Thanks, Nikola from Austria
I watched a review of the Sony HXR-NX30. It was highlighted that the camera had a facial recognition ability and that the camera would stay focused on that face. The review also showed how the camera auto corrected very smoothly transitioning from a shadowy setting to a lighted setting. Can this camera do either of those?
+Sean Fliehman I don't recall if it has facial recognition, you're best to read the manual. Transitions from dark to light and vice versa are better done manually if possible.
I just ordered this camera as my first entry into a pro style camera. Between your review and others I have seen a lot of features and demos that answered my questions. One thing I am still wondering about, as I can not find the full user manual on Sony's website - does this camera feature night shot to record in total darkness? The phone rep at B&H said no, the online rep under the awnsered questions part said yes, but another use said no. Do you know anything about this feature being on the camera? I have paranormal groups who are interested in it. Thanks for any replies!
+UKAirscapeThanks for the reply. I saw in another review video what looked like night shot type of function, but it was presented in Japanese, and I couldn't understand it. But this part of the video shows what looks like night shot using the Low Lux button?
Ah, I can see how that could be used. The low lux mode, if I recall correctly, puts the camera largely into auto and cranks up the gain astronomically so as to give a picture in terrible light. It's not the same as "nightshot" mode which uses infra red but you might end up with similar results I suppose.
+UKAirscape Thanks for the replies. I'm suppose to be getting the camera tomorrow. I'll be sure to go through it well and test everything out. Thanks again! As someone new to shooting more pro style video, I enjoy your channel very much! It helped me choose this camera as my first pro level camera. Thanks again!
+UKAirscape Just received my NX100 today, and I can now conform it DOES indeed have inferred night shot on it. You put the camera into full auto mode, and then in the menus, you program the LUX button to activate the night shot mode. So it does indeed include inferred night vision.
Hi There I have a Z1 and have used it now for years with great success as a business youtube camera and presentations of products. I find the zoom, use of tapes and head cleaning a pain. Is this all eliminated and is this camera a better option for me considering the aforementioned?
Oh my goodness yes; any of the modern solid-state camcorders will not only provide a much easier and more reliable workflow than tapes but the advances in sensor and image processing technology will give you a much better and sharper image, especially in dim conditions. This particular camcorder isn't really the successor to the Z1 but is so much more advanced that it would still be a very substantial upgrade. Something like the Sony HXR-NX5 would be more akin to a modern Z1 for HD work, and a PXW-Z190 the same for 4K work. Having said all that, I'm not sure what you mean about the zoom being a pain....?
Hi and thanks for the reply. I looked at a HXR-NX3 but it does not record in PAL I am led to understand. Does the HXR-NX5 record in PAL. Secondly is this important? I'm not sure I get the whole NTSC-PAL scenario here in OZ in respect to filming, editing on the PC with Premiere Pro and putting my vids on RUclips. I have no real need to put anything I do on DVD and if I did what's the problem. cheers and I appreciate your time
I'm pretty sure there is a PAL version of the NX3, we certainly have one here in the UK as far as I recall! If your videos are solely for RUclips or other computer use then the PAL/NTSC issue is utterly irrelevant UNLESS you plan to mix footage from different sources in which case you probably want them all to match. Otherwise you end up having to re-format one set of footage to the other set's framerate. In other words, if you shoot some at 25fps (pal) and other at 29.97 (ntsc), then your final timeline will have to be rendered at one or the other and the footage shot at whichever rate you don't choose will end up being re-encoded at the chosen frame rate which can look jerky.
I don't recall whether it continually shows focus (I only had the camcorder on loan) but it keep focus throughout the zoom, as virtually all of these type of camcorders do.
I’m looking for a camcorder that gives me all the manual controls that I want, but still can be easy to use and gets good quality. All I really need is HD at 60 fps, so do you think this is worth the buy?
I'm not sure I recall this camcorder filming at 60fps, I'd check the specs if I were you. If it does, then it's a decent cam for the price (or was, when I last looked). Depends on what you're filming of course.
On the Sony website it says the NTSC model gets up to 60p and 60i...maybe you had the PAL model. I would mainly be filming trains/aircraft, so I would need the higher frame rate. Thanks for the reply!
Yes, I had the PAL model which does 50i but that is interlaced remember, so it's only equivalent to 25p / 30p. Not that same as 60p (60 complete progressive frames). If your output is to the web, then you need progressive, as you'd have to de-interlace "i" footage.
I didn’t think I would be using interlacing anyway, so that shouldn’t be a problem. This is my first time getting an actual video camera, so I want to make sure this is the right one for me. Thanks for helping me through this lol
Ah, I beg your pardon, I misread the spec!! Indeed the PAL model does do 50p in HD (and yours, as you say, does true 60p too). For its price, I liked this camcorder but it's certainly "entry level" as far as pro camcorders go. It's got the manual controls you'll want though and a decent image.
Another great, honest review, congrats! Aside from the standard outdoors and indoors scenes, I shoot a lot of theater and concerts on stages that are often poorly lit. There are often very bright spotlights together with dimly lit areas of the stage. Those lighting conditions are challenging and require a camcorder with wide dynamic range to be able to balance the exposure and get acceptable white and black levels. Right now I am looking for a camcorder able to capture a Wide Dynamic Range, preferably 4K capable for future proofing. Have you had a chance to test the NX100 for its dynamic range? I would like to compare it with the Sony X70, JVC HM170 and the Canon XA30 (G40 in its just announced prosumer version). Of those four, the X70 and HM170 are 4K capable and would be preferred, if equally capable of capturing WDR. Thanks!
I didn't really get a chance to test dynamic range other than in those shots of the boats and the sky. Certainly didn't get to do any formal testing (and I'm not expert enough for those kind of labs tests anyway). Your circumstances are of course the most difficult for any camcorder. I know the Canon G40 / XA30 has a wide dynamic range mode which might help but I've not tried it. I wonder whether you wouldn't be better looking for something that shoots one of the log profiles (and then having to colour grade in editing, which needn't be difficult if you just want to expand the contrast, essentially). That would point you towards Panasonic's DVX200 in the camcorder shape or a GH4R / Sony A7Sii in stills-type. Much more expensive than your preferred options, sadly.
+Frederic Berger I'd like to but I'm not going to fork out the cash myself and I don't have any contacts at Canon to lend me one so it may not happen. I can try emailing their press office again but it's never got me very far to date :-(
This is the 2nd review I've watched about this camcorder. The viewfinder is a concern for me, as both reviews have made mention how bad it is. Have you reviewed or aware of another comparable camcorder without that issue...and is the pricing close? I would be using it for a lot of outdoor shooting that usally turns to dusk, then nightfall (outside events with stage lighting - concerts, other performances)....I looked up the Canon XF200, and too expensive for me at the moment....The Sony PXW X70 is also a tad high - I see only 1 ring on that model...interesting ???
The other review may have also been me, on my other channel (Tubeshootermag)! Other commenters have said their units were fine so maybe mine was an early model or something. There's no comparably-priced cam that I know of though Panasonic do have a low cost camcorder but I've not tested their latest version. The XF200 has poor low light performance, a really grainy image. I like the X70 a lot but as you say, it's slightly less ergonomic due to the single ring and it's slightly older now so the NX100 probably has better electronics inside.
Haha, I like responding (with sensible commenters). Haven't done any vids lately, there's not much low-end camcordery stuff coming out these days, it's all about mobile phones :-(
UKAirscape yeah, It's all mobile stuff. Or it's all about RED cameras, or big expensive rigs now... You should review the Panasonic AG-AC30 if you haven't already done it. For me, budget stuff is great, since I'm still in school, and $2,000+ cameras like the Sony NXR-NX5R are way out of my price range. That's why I love camera like these since it looks professional enough to look like you know what you're doing and maintain professionalism while keeping a lower budget.
Unfortunately, Panasonic have never loaned me any gear so I can only review from them what I buy with my own cash (ouch!) and the AG-AC30 is quite old now so it's not one I'll get. There are lots of reviews of it though; I think mostly positive, given the price.
There is never one single "best" for anything else there'd only ever be one product on the market. Different software works well for different people. So it depends what you like, what you're used to and what you want to do. FCPX is very popular and not too costly. Adobe Premiere is also popular but you have to pay on a monthly subscription. Avid Media Composer would be the choice if you work in broadcast or film (and have deep pockets)
Thanks for the review, been looking at this camera for a while now, am going into professional music video production and want to use camcorders and not dlsr, do you think this camera will do a decent music video job or you prefer another one for 2000 euro or less, if you think dlsr is better for music video, which will u advice, thanks
Depends entirely on what you're shooting in the music video. You can't simply say any device is suitable "for music videos" as there are so many things that could encompass. Camcorders are good for ease of use and grabbing shots on the fly; DSLRs are good at making "pretty" shots when you have the time to set them up. It's horses for courses.
I've not tested the Panasonic but I did really like the Sony especially at the price. It may depend simply on your personal experience and preference - are you a Sony fan or a Panasonic fan? What use do you intend to put it to?
Two stability modes: standard (not brilliant but OK for holding a wide-angle shot a bit firmer) and active which was much better but crops slightly in on the image. It's not a glidecam or gimbal quality, it's more like a normal camcorder stabiliser.
yes useful thanks, "send us a SD dvd," yup... Now if i remember correctly the old Sony VX2000 used to be lcd or viewfinder, but if you turn the LCD to face forwards the viewfinder would come on, does this lcd turn enough to face forwards? and if so does the viewfinder come on? we used to do that a l ot instead of opening and closing the lcd! Cheers great breakdown!
HI, Great review! I do have a Sony HDR-CX900. I've been very happy with it. According to the Sony website, the NX100 and the CX900 basically have the same censor, and pixel resolution. Is it really worth an upgrade as far as video resolution? Thank you.
+Joe Cifaldi With apologies, I don't understand your question. Since you've confirmed they're the same sensor, there will be no "upgrade as far as video resolution" by buying the NX100. What you're gaining is better physical controls.
Sorry, what I ment was would it be worth getting the NX100 if I already have the CX900, if there would be much of a difference in video quality. It does seem like the NX100 does have more bells and whistles.
+Joe Cifaldi I doubt there would be an appreciable improvement in video quality. What you gain is much better manual physical controls and the XLR audio inputs of course. The CX900's advantages are its inconspicuous and portable size.
+UKAirscape Ok thanks, 1. Thank you for responding, escpecially so quickly, and 2. Im planning on using it for short films, some stOhage performances and maybe a few other jobs. Being small and stealthy isnt a nessasity, but it would definitly be ok.
Hmm, well now I'm starting to get paranoid that I've remembered incorrectly... do double check with the vendor before buying, just in case I'm being an idiot!
I have used a sony NX5U for years. I am looking at adding a second camera for some of my work. Would the video this captures be as good or noticeably worse than the NX5U. I know the Nx5U is discontinued and sony recommends the PXW, but I'm looking to add a second camera for a lot less cost.
+Ryan S Hi. I haven't done a direct comparison of the two but the NX100 has decent images in my opinion and since your criteria is "second camera for a lot less cost", I doubt you'll do any better than the NX100.
More about settings. If you were shooting perhaps a dog competition for a wealthy dog owner that would view the video on a large computer monitor and send out links to friends; what settings would you use? Would you use a tripod or monopod? What type of microphone?
+Ralph Bullis With apologies, those are all far too vast questions to be answered in a RUclips comment. And, I don't mean this nastily, but if you're unsure of whether to use a tripod or not or what kind of mic to use, are you sure you have the expertise to be shooting video for wealthy clients? I'll try briefly to answer though: shoot in XAVC-S at 50Mbps. If you're in the arena following the dog around from 2-3 feet away, you'll do it handheld. If you're on the sidelines, then heavens yes you must use a tripod and a hefty, sturdy, professional one at that with a decent fluid head, because you're going to have to use a lot of zoom and be tracking the dog as it moves round. Mic - depends whether you just want to capture the atmosphere of the arena (in which case the inbuilt one will do) or actually do any interviews in which case the answer requires more paragraphs than I've time to put here, really, and more detail about what you want to do.
My best guess to what he was saying that the skin tones were somehow shifting, like the skin would go to orange or something. so in that case, he probably meant he was having white balance issues.
I'd like to buy a shotgun external mic setup for this camera. Any suggestions for a good sounding one for indoor or outdoor use at an affordable price? RUclips videos and such. Wireless options also. Thanks.
+UKAirscape Sorry to be vague, I'm a bit of a novice at the sound aspect. I would like to conduct interviews indoors for RUclips and outside NG documentary style footage. My budget is $500 U.S. Movie reviews, my friend and I talking on camera and occasional product reviews solo. Not camcorders, you're the clear expert at that. Thanks.
+SuperRtrtrtr With apologies I don't know what "NG documentaries" means (National Geographic??). Indoors interviews I'd generally use a lavalier (tie clip) mic if there's time to attach it. Wireless ones save you the bother of trailing cords (and the interviewee walking off when still attached, only to yank the camera over!). Something like the RodeLink Wireless system could be good, I use one and like it. Hard to plug two of them in though if you want two channels. For a shotgun, I'd look at something like a Rode NTG2 or maybe an Audio Technica AT875R. Make sure you buy a decent windjammer with it, something from Rycote. They're expensive but do a proper job. Cheap ones can be rubbish. They muffle the wind but muffle the sound as well! If you're trying to capture sound from two of you, one mic isn't optimal though you can get away with it if you're careful with placement. Don't just rely on the mic being on top of the camera unless you're right in front of it; mics need to be close to work properly.
UKAirscape i will use it to shoot events and my daughter performance in martial arts .in this moment i own a canon ,but in low light its not so good. i tried to shoot with a reflex but its to much a problem setting focus and al that stuff. that being said what do you think? nx100 or ux90.best regards
People talk about BBC hd broadcast standards being 50mbps and 4.2.2 colour. This does 4.2.0. Do you think that matters...if you were to shoot a great looking documentary with brilliant content, would it still pass their standards?
I think if you were commissioned to produce a doc for the BBC they'd want it done on a rather more expensive camera than this, say a PXW-X180 or similar. I recall that its predecessor, the PMW-180 was the first and lowest cost (at £5k ish) camcorder to meet the broadcast spec. That said, were you to present some footage of a "must see" event eg in a news capacity filmed on this camcorder then the rules would go straight out of the window and they'd snap it up. Let's face it, mobile phone footage is OK for news use! Oddly, the whole 50Mbps thing really is a red herring because of the advances in codecs. When it was specified, camcorders were using MPEG-2, and now H.264 achieves comparable results in half the but rate so a 50Mbps XAVC-S recording should easily exceed a 50Mbps MPEG-2 file :-)
Not used but I'd seriously doubt it's better. It's a much older model, with much smaller sensors, albeit three small versus the Sony's one large one. No doubt Panasonic fans would rage at me for saying so though.
The AG-AC30 is a year newer than the SONY NX100 and what I read in reviews the Sony NX100 is terrible in auto focus so it would be no good for shooting sports.
The XA is much more compact. The X70 is also more compact and can do 4K (with an upgrade) as well as 4:2:2 colour I think. This is a cheap but good HD ENG cam.
Bravo ... i think one of the best review of a camcorder (either good or bad camcorder), you speak very logicaly about everything (specialy for the 4k). We shoot with dslrs (without 4k) and the clients are very happy with the results... I have thoughts to buy this camera for events (school and sports events) but also for weddings.... What is your opinion ... ??? Thank you.
Thank you. I think that provided you know what you're doing and therefore what it is you're buying (and what it is not eg massively shallow depth of field) then it would be fine. You might still want your DSLR for wedding "beauty shots" but this would make a fine rolling record of "as it happens" stuff. One potential downside I suppose would be that as the lens is purely servo driven (no manual option as with higher priced camcorders) you can't crash zoom in and out to reframe which can sometimes be useful in live event videography.
Thanks for the quick reply .. I think for the privileges of a pure camcorder camera (and for this price)I will have to sustain the downside of it (hardly any shallow depth of field, fixed lens and more ..). thanks again.
Please help me! I just recorded video for the first time using this video camera and for the life of me, I simply cannot get the footage off of the video camera. - First I attempted to connect the camera directly to my iMac. But everything in the instruction manual shows only how to (view) the footage on my computer screen. (which is useless to me if I can't get it off/out of the video camera. - Then I purchased a flash card reader and sure enough I can see all the folders on the card - and everyone of them display on my computer as ("empty"). I was shocked and began sweating and stressing out! Had I screwed up and not really recorded anything???? - I took the SD card out of the flash card reader, put it back into the video camera, pressed "Thumbnails" and presto!... There is all of the footage I shot. - I can clearly see it on the camera, but I can't get it out of there! - I've done a ton of Google searches and NOBODY explains how to get the stupid footage off of this camera. - There are multiple videos on RUclips explaining the basic operation of this camera and so-called "QuickStart" methods - And still, nobody tells you how to get the stupid footage off of this camera! I've tried calling Sony Tech Support and was transferred 4 times because they kept telling me "we're sorry, that's professional equipment so we have to transfer you to a different department. Once I finally got to the right department, they told me to leave a message and someone would get back to me in 24. hours. That never happened and I'm still here now nearly a week after these incredibly important and time sensitive videos, still trying to get the stupid footage off of this camera. PLEASE, PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!
For only an additional $300 why would someone buy this over the X70? Personally I was hoping Sony would put the X70 Specs in this form factor. Shrug. Looks Like I am buy the X70... Thanks for the detailed overview! Cheers, Greg
+Greg Allen There's not much elaboration to be made. The X70 is more compact, 4K-upgradeable and has HD-SDI. The NX100 is cheaper and has more extensive manual controls. Whichever is right for you will depend on your needs and circumstances.
UKAirscape Which is why I went out of my way to get it now - Originally didn't plan to get it until next month so I had to borrow some money to buy it now, heh. Did you play around with the picture profiles at all?
Nice review. I thought Jordan's 3rd worst camera assessment failed to judge it on its merits. Jordan is using an FS7 using gimbals and color grading log files. Probably more that 90% of us need or wish to bother with.
I'm so glad YOU did this review as you always manage to give us such comprehensive information without muddling about. I did watch another review which compared the HXR-NX100 to the HDR-CX900 ruclips.net/video/M5ER6cC7c_M/видео.html and by golly you really cant pick the picture difference on You Tube. The NX100 is AU$600 more and you get 3 manual lens rings, more manual control, dual card slots, Pro Audio, so I suppose it's a pretty good deal. But the PXW-X70 is only another AU$250 more, it has less controls like the CX900 but I assume it has much better pictures. Ah the dilemma of trying to choose which camera next. :-)
+Mervyn Jack Thank you! I don't think the picture's particularly better on the X70, they're all much of a muchness. The X70 brings you a much more ergonomic and sensibly thought out camcorder than the CX900, plus pro audio. It also has the 4K (paid) option. The NX100 offers those manual controls. Your needs and experience should make the choice for you ;-) Good luck.
I'm always enjoying your "down to earth" approach on so called "must haves" (4K etc.) on camcorders nowadays...facing reality and today's standards, great.
Keep going!
+Markus Falkenstein Thank you!
I tried to buy this in Montreal where I live. To my surprise, I was told to wait for the NX-80. I explained to the retailer my inexperience and he immediately informed me the AF was extremely sluggish on this Cam. He quipped that based on my lack of experience would demand that AF should be a priority until I mastered the camera. I appreciated his input, as I did yours. You are clearly an expert that probably never uses AF. Who knows, maybe a NX-200 is on the way in the not too distant future. I've never experienced a salesman practically begging me not to buy a product. He was a pro and owned one himself and like you, had nothing but praise for it otherwise.
I have heard that the autofocus on the new NX80 is substantially better than these older models, yes, though I have not been able to test it. As a beginner, it may well be that you like to use AF but at the same time, I have always found autofocuses to not be 100% reliable - after all, they can only guess which bit of the image you want to be in focus. The NX80 is certainly more modern but it doesn't have such an extensive set of manual controls so whether it's right for you depends on what you want to do . I agree, an NX200 with the features of the NX80 in the NX100 body would be great.
nice review
i ended up buying a pxw-x70 sony
i got 4k upgraded, but the bad things is it wont display image at the HDMI port at the same time i record 4k
it does live monitoring but just in 1080p
do you know any camera in 4k that can do that?? for less 2000$ us dollar?
Offhand, at that price, I can't think of any. You've got the JVCHM170/200 which I wasn't a huge fan of, there's a Panasonic (not the DVX200, another one whose model number escapes me) and the Sony. Unfortunately I've no idea if they permit 4K monitoring. I presume they tend not to because it requires processor power to create the signal and in the low cost camcorders, the processor is busy doing the encoding and not much else!!
UKAirscape
almost buy JVC but sensor is small and it is easier to sell a SONY than a JVC later on the road. Lens surely sony is better as well
Excellent review. 22 minutes of densely packed, extremely valuable and practical information. What is more: delivered to camera logically, faultlessly without a “hum or errrr”, pause or fluff, gee whiz or hiccup. How do you do it? You do not seem to have any idiot prompt cards. Congratulations on a very accomplished and useful piece of work. (your valuable comments on 4K storage and processing requirements are well taken by the way) Many thanks.
Thank you! No, no prompt cards just "off the cuff" and a single take as well ;-)
+UKAirscape
"um err jee whiz that is just awesome err "
Once more many thanks for your excellent reviews (and growing library) and as the ancient sage from Yorkshire says " long may your despatches from the long boat on the cut continue" (-:
Brilliant review, as always. As a passionate amateur I love receiving these reviews. Keep up the good work!
+Astraeus Video Very kind of you to say, thank you :-)
I have to say after watching your review of this camera a few weeks ago, I decided to go to B&H photo to research what other options and features, prices and so on that were out there. That being said, I can't find anything that measures up to this for price, picture quality and such. I asked other buyers on RUclips on their thoughts as well and they all seemed very satisfied. I know, that's exactly what you said in essence in your review. Finally, I believe Sony will sell quite a few of these and have you to thank for it.
Cheers :-)
Hi, I have finally purchased the HXR NX 100 and I must say: fantastic camera! Thanky ou very much for your review, which helped me a lot to go for it. Two Informations:
1) I have purchased at Sony service the lens-hood for the 4k model PXW-Z150. This hood has the built in mechanic with two lids which close the hood with a pleasant "click" and protect the lens. It fits perfectly to the HXR NX 100, and even an 62mm UV filter attached onto the Lens is not a problem.
2) I do not observe the rainbow efect in the EVF, which you've reported about. Maybe they have fixed it. The picture in the evf is quite small, but ok. The three rings on the objective work perfektly smooth and responsive. I really like the camera.
Best regards from Austria!
+Nik Zuhause That tip about the lens hood is excellent! Great idea.
As for point 2, I've had several people since say that their camera viewfinders are fine so it must have been a fault or early issue on the test model I was sent (either that or there's something wrong with my eyes, which is also possible!)
Hey, whats the reference of the Lenshood of the PXW-Z150. I am searching with google but I can't find the spare part reference. Thaks.
Don't normally comment on stuff but this is an outstanding and informative review, thanks so much.
Thank you very much!
Many thanks for this and all your videos from this and your other channels. Nice to have someone actually have a non-bias "REVIEW" of something, rather than just say "it's crap don't buy it" or "if you don't buy this you're an idiot". Also, no distracting music, effects or the new "alternate angle" shot of seeing the host talking to the camera. I'm sorry, but if someone is talking to me I want to see their face, not the back of their head. If someone is going to spend any money on anything, they need as much info that they can get. No distractions. These videos have "no BS" and to the point with no "faffing about". Sorry for the mini-rant, but there you go.
We purchased an HXR-MC88 (yes, not 4K) for our church webcasts primarily for use on an bescor MP101 remote head. If it is still available when we can afford another camera, I think the NX100 would be a great fit for handheld or tripod use to match along with. We picked the MC88 over the consumer 4K's cams for the full-size HDMI and the prosumer features and firmware.
Only thing I don't like about this one is the BNC not being HD-SDI. I guess it was easier to use that instead of having a stereo mini jack for it. Just a lot of wasted space for most people, although there seems to still be a market for SD somewhere.
Thank you 😀
For the price, that is a lot of rather good camera. I am still very happy with my FDR-AXP33 and I don't film yet at 4K. I set my camcorder to record 1080 at 50 and it is a stunning picture. 4K is the future and of course there will be even more impressive standards after that but 1080 is good enough for most people right now. I really enjoyed your review (as I always do enjoy your videos). Thanks for introducing me to a new model on the marketplace. All the best.
+Aaron's allotment I too am still using the AXP33 - indeed this review was filmed on it, in 4K mode so as to get those cropped in cutaway shots - and find it a very useful point-and--shoot. I quite fancy getting the just-announced updated version, the AX53 though, for a better sensor, longer zoom and 100fps slowmo (120 on NTSC country cameras)
Hi,
could you please spend some words about:
1) The quality of the image stabiliser of this camera?
2) The zoom speed? Can it make creeping zoom? Does ist start and stop the zoom smoothly?
3) Could you please compare the camera regarding the points above against the PXW 70?
4) Would you recommend it rather the PXW 70 for somebody, who does not need 4K?
5) The view finder is obviously poor, but still: can it be used outside, or would you categorise it as unusable?
6) Is the weight of the camera not too high, when filming without a tripod?
7) what is the "feeling" regarding the body- dose it feel too plasticky, or rather solid?
8) do the buttons have a solid switching point?
Thank you very much in advance!
Nikola
+Nik Zuhause 1. Image stabilisation has two modes, standard and active. Standard is like a basic camcorder. Active is much better but crops the image a fraction. Neither mode is as good as the BOSS system used on Sony's consumer cams, and nothing like a motorised gimbal.
2. You can do a creeping zoom, best if you use a remote LANC controller though.
3. I can't compare against the X70 as I don't have one (I merely borrowed one for review at the time)
4. Can't say. They're different types of unit. The X70 is smaller and easy to take around, it also has things like HD-SDI output as I recall. But it's more expensive. So it depends what you want and what you need.
5. I talked about that in the video.
6. Weight is fine
7. A bit plasticky but not as bad as a JVC GY-HM170
8. Not really
+UKAirscape Thank you very much!. Really great review! I love the way you do it!
Well said. This is the best, most practical review I have heard of any camera in a long. Glad you saw past the 4K silliness. 99% of the time you could make money with the cam it seems to me.
Thank you. I think this cam is a little gem.
Excellent review - very useful - I'm very much an entry level amateur and based on your thoughts bought one of these for a project that involving a lot of "unfolding event" field shooting as well as office interviews. Very happy with it.
Terrific. I am really pleased. Comments like that make doing the reviews very worthwhile! Cheers.
Great review. I have decided to get it. All I want is 1080p and I am very semi pro
Thanks. Enjoy the camera :-)
An Amazon review mentioned there was an internal menu where you could get 1080 from the BNC output; is that true in a firmware update or such since your review was posted, or (as usual) do Amazon reviews tend to not be accurate?
Unfortunately I have no idea; sorry.
Fantastic review!
I have this camera for about three weeks now and I'm rather satisfied with it.
I totally agree with you about the 4K debate, although I would like to have an upgrade soon.
Another annoying thing is that I cannot access the menu when I'm looking through the viewfinder.
Thanks! I didn't notice that the menu didn't come up in the viewfinder; useful info!
Love your reviews. The reason why I have a low light obsession!! Is 99% of my filming is fireworks. So I would like reviewers to add more low light reviews :) I use this camera and the FDR-AX100 for the 4K.
+SpawnAgainFireworks Ah but it's not really low is it, becuase the fireworks themselves are bright! So if you turn the exposure to be correct for the fireworks, the dark areas should be so dim that the noise is masked anyway, surely?
+UKAirscape Thanks for the reply, unfortunately I am an amateur in filming so I have to rely on the camera to do all of the work! And with fireworks you only get one chance to get it right! And I think that the two cameras that I have really do a good job of focusing and colours, on firework mode!
do you like this better than a canon XA 50?
Does this offer live streaming? I know there is no sdi, but many are complaining about the HDMI output, any idea what the complaints are about?
I have not tested the Canon so can't really comment, unfortunately.
The 'G' in Sony's 'G lenses' stands for 'Gold Standard'. I gleaned that piece of information from one of Sony's lens catalogues here in Japan.
I agree with your views on this NX100 and it is a very valid camera as it is. If you have a radio mic stuck on top of that camera and want to close the monitor to use the viewfinder - good luck. Sony would do well to take a leaf out of Panasonic's book and have a monitor that slides in without having to remove any accessory you may have in the shoe.
A small gripe that I have about the MI Shoe is that the travel is far too short (rails too short) and I have found that accessories such as lights and wireless receivers tend to pop out in real life situations so you have to clamp them down much harder than usual. I understand that on cameras like the A7 series for example, that there is simply not enough space, but on my FS7 there is ample space and the secondary accessory shoe at the rear is longer!! Please Sony, make the rails a little longer to accommodate non-MI accessories (these lock into place and are no issue).
Crumbs, I hadn't even considered the MI accessories getting in the way of the screen shutting; good point!
Do the MI accessories not screw onto the shoe to hold them tight, like a normal shoe accessory would? I've never actually tried any.
The MI accessories are designed to slot in and fit in properly, They are not the issue. The issue arises (and occasionally arises I might add) when you use non-MI accessories which have a square foot that prevents them from being fully inserted. This means that a small portion hangs out at the end. This seems to be enough for the accessory to work loose and suddenly pop out in use. Obviously, tripod use is not an issue, but when running and gunning, it does happen. In my latest news item on 'Shopping in Japan' my Sony wireless (not the latest MI compatible version) came loose and was hanging freely in the crowd as I progressed down the street. In these conditions it is both dangerous to passers by as well as an inconvenience.
+Andrew Jones Productions Ah, I beg your pardon, I hadn't understood. It makes perfect sense now. Yes, not good at all.
Thanks for this great review, very helpful and presented very well!
The only downside I see to it is that it doesn't record 4:2:2 subsampling (do you know if it outputs uncompressed 4:2:2 via HDMI?) and has a shortish optical zoom and the clear image zoom doesn't always look as good as optical does (Would you be able to show a sample of the clear image zoom?). Also from what you said about the viewfinder, that isn't so good, but it does look like a good prosumer camcorder.
From your videos from the camcorder, they look just slightly on the dull side (not bright enough), but not bad quality though. The low light gain looks very good, and defiantly as you said, much better than the XF200.
Your right about 4K, especially if your shooting for television as its not necessary yet since many stations still broadcast in SD. I know its good to have 4K on a camera, but its not always necessary to use it.
I am getting a Panasonic GH4 soon, which can record up to 4K resolution and although the 4K does look very good, I am going to record in 1920x1080 for now since I have an Atomos Ninja 2 recorder and will be better off using it and getting the 4:2:2 10-bit from HDMI rather than internal 4:2:0 8-bit. Even if the internal 4K would have more pixels than the Ninja 2 video, the Ninja 2 would be better to use as it will give me a better codec, more subsampling, 10-bit color and unrestricted record time, not limited to 29 minutes per video.
I did show the Clear Image Zoom, you weren't paying attention!! ;-) Go and watch again!
Not sure about the HDMI out, sorry. Best to check the manual maybe which can be found online. I'll drop a note to Sony's PR firm who lent me the cam as well and ask them to find out.
I'd just like to add my thanks for the great review. All the sorts of geeky but none-the-less important questions covered. I was saving for the AX53 which does look like a lovely grab and go camcorder. But I just know that I'm going to want manual control. Since I've been thinking more seriously about video production, I can see just how often focusing is used to move the viewer's eye from the front of the scene and back. or just to blur one or the other in order provide a backdrop or foreground frame for the subject. It's used ALL the time!
So built in NDs, manual iris and focus control are really important. I'm on a tight budget and this seems to hit the spot.
If you know of anything else coming up in the next few months in the £1300ish range which is worth waiting for, let me know!
Again, thank you for taking the time to research, film, edit and share your expertise.
The AX53 does have manual focus. It's the exposure that's a bit of a pain. No ND, alas. Do you need 4K or will HD suffice? If shallow DoF is critical to you, a large-sensor DSLR may be more appropriate than a camcorder.
Hi. Shallow DOF is important to me but so's the autofocus performance when that's required. I have a 7D but shooting video on the run is a dreadful experience.
4K isn't a necessity.
The AX53 has manual but not at the same time as IRIS. The BOS looks amazing and that's a tempting feature on it's own but the lack of manual control over IRIS and Focus at the same time is a problem.
I've got a few months before taking the plunge so will stay tuned to your channel for anything else coming up early in the New Year.
Thanks again for the reviews :D
Agreed, almost no small consumer cams have separate controls for focus and exposure although Canon's HF-G40 does (the iris being via a small dial on the side). In fact, this cam would be the compact run-and-gun you need. If you need XLR audio, there's the XA30 which is exactly the same unit but with an audio handle. Neither will do you shallow DoF without a great deal of effort - they've got tiny sensors - but that's what makes them good for ENG style shooting. Stabilisation is decent but not as good as Sony's BOSS (nothing is!)
I enjoyed the review very much. One thing I would add as a side comment... is that in the comparison shot with the canon... there was A LOT more detail in the canon camera... so there is a lot of processing being done in the sony's camera to omit the noise. That being said... I'm a fan of this camera too and I just ordered it.
I don't think I could agree that there's "a lot more detail" in the Canon
Your jacket looks 'ironed' on the sony side... you could see the wrinkles on the canon side... also some of the wood pattern is more visible on the canon side. Take a look... or is it a youtube compression thing?
I really enjoyed your review of this camera. I was wondering what the catches were and I have them. I live in Canada, our dollar is collapsing, this camcorder is going up in price 20 U.S. fucking dollars everyday! Thank you. How is the build quality BTW?
It's a bit plasticky but not horrific, especially for the price.
Excellent review. I've been looking into an HD camcorder at the pro entry level after owning a Sony VX2100 Mini-DV camcorder which was great in its time. This camcorder is very similar in its design. I did order mine today and will have it in just 2 days. I do have two extra batteries from the previous Sony camcorder so the backup power supply is all ready to go.
Thanks again for the great review!!
Hope you enjoy the camcorder. Cheers!
PS did you remember to order some fast SDXC cards too? ;-)
Yes. Received two 64gb SanDisk class 10 chips. They work perfectly.
4k is totally NOT needed unless you're shooting a Nat Geo documentary or something. People get very caught up in the 4k race.
+S Bre Totally agree with you about this matter.
People tend to go after things without having any knowledge what's it all about.
What a great review, thanks a lot!
Hello,
Thank you for the excellent review.
How is the HXR-NX100 image stabilization comparing to the PXW-X70?
+Raz Kasher I haven't compared them directly so I can't honestly give you a sensible answer, sorry.
Many thanks for this review. Much appreciated. I hope Sony is listening to your feedback, esp. wrt improving the EVF, which I think is essential for RnG.
I'm going to point them to the review (since they loaned me the camera!) and suggest that they read the comments as well ;-)
2 years later the NX100 is still best seller :D
do they share the same sensor? WHich one has better low-light performance in HD out of these 3 cameras?
nx100
cx900
ax100 ( i won't shoot 4K)
I'm not actually sure that it's the exact same sensor but certainly very similar I think. I haven't done a side by side comparison of all three simultaneously so can't really answer the question.
If you're not shooting 4K then the AX100 *is* the same as the CX900 though, I believe there's no other difference as I recall.
UKAirscape
I do social events, I think people might consider the CX900 as amateur work. Im 90% leaning towards the nx100
Your review was comprehensive.
Thank you. The NX give a more "pro" appearance for sure.
I'm curious how this camera check when shooting weddings . Especially in the church , where it is dark. Often in the wedding hall they are turned off all the lights . Only light music band . Please say something about this. Thank you.
I would say that - for the price - it copes with dimly lit situations better than any competitor. But no camera deals very well in the dark because sensors need light to operate.
+UKAirscape Thank you very much!
My NX100 goes abruptly between each dB step (9dB, 12dB, 15 dB, etc.). If dB is set on auto and I change the iris, the gain changes smoothly, so I think the camera is able to do that. On an older camera, the Sony Z5 for example, there is an option in the menu for smooth transition between each dB step, but I can't find that option on the NX100. Please help me: How do you smoothly transition between each dB step? Thank you!
I don't know, sorry.
i am getting noise sound after 5 in the nobs any thought ?
Noise will inevitably increase as you increase the gain.
This looks like an excellent value and a great video camera for some starting a live event shooting business. It makes me cringe when I think about the price and the quality of the cameras I used when I got started. Gerry in Calgary.
Haha, i know. It's incredible how far the technology has come in the last fe years!
Can this be used for live streaming
Also what's the shallow depth of field like with the large sensor?
It's achievable with a bit of zoom and a bit of effort but it's not DSLR like. The lens is only f2.8 at the wide end and then it ramps as you zoom so in one sense you're decreasing DoF by zooming but contradicting that by the lens ramping! I think I had a couple of examples of focus pulling in the video which demonstrate.
Fantastic review as always. You're always so extensive with the info you give, superb. This is quite similar to the AC90 that I'm using - seems like a bit of a bargain at the price too. I'll be moving to the AG-DVX 200 very soon for 4K support, cannot wait. Do you have any plans to review this? Would love to hear your take on it.
Hi. Thanks. I did a "preview" a couple of months back at a press event, it's on my other channel at ruclips.net/video/AMkjE9HkWGM/видео.html
I watched that already, thanks. Well, I decided to go ahed and get the DVX200 4K - what an amazing piece of kit. Simply stunning!!
Marvelous! I wonder..... need SLOW zoom (variable maybe?) and remote control functions (zoom, focus, etc) can it handle? Wonderful review....thank you!!!
The zoom is variable. I did all mine on a Manfrotto LANC controller. Not sure about remote focus, I've never liked trying to focus on a handle control.
Is the autofocus able to lock onto a designated subject in the frame, other than just facial recognition? Is the auto white balance pretty accurate?
I talked about the auto white balance in the review but additionally, ever single sample shot was on auto WB. I've always found this level of Sony camcorder does it superbly (my Z5 was great too) though the PMW200 oddly wasn't as good.
Didn't try autofocus, I try never to use it.
Hi,
regarding the zoom rocker, I believe, it has been said, that it has several speeds?
Does the speed vary in dependancy of the pressure force on the rocker (which I would expect)? Is the speed in that case changing gradually in an "analog way" if you increase the pressure or rather abruptly switching between few speeds? If abruptly: how many speeds are provided?
What I would prefer, is that you can make a gentle transition from zero to some moderate speed, not like stop-and -go .
I didn't test the rocker to that degree of accuracy! As I recall, it was pressure sensitive. I prefer to use a remote controller on the tripod bar and that had the usual degree of sensitivity according to pressure, you could do a creeping zoom or a fast(ish) one.
Thank you for your video, great insight.
I have been thinking of event coverage on my videos and I was wondering if such camcorder would be good? Or should I stick with my DSLR with a lens of low f-stop? Would be nice to get some opinions on the comments. Thank you!
Covering events with a DSLR can be a nightmare because with people moving around (including yourself), trying to get quick, accurate focus can be troublesome due to the DSLR's shallow depth of field. Granted it will look "prettier" but you may have fewer useable shots. For ENG use I would always rather use a camcorder but you'll find many DSLR devotees who would disagree with me.
Also, is audio important to you at the events? Any interviews? DSLR audio can be a minefield and end up loading you up with extra kit. The all-in-one nature of a camcorder makes it ultra compact for moving around at events.
Hi.I was watching carefully your review and i find it very complete, impartial, and informative.I have a Sony HDR - AX2000 (much like the NX5) and i have not found on the internet any comparation of the image quality between the NX100 and the AX2000 or the NX5.How do you compare the image quality of a single 1" sensor with the older 3x1/3 sensors?can you get a comparation between the NX100 and the AX2000 or NX5?Thanks.
Hi. I have no access to an AX2000 or NX5 so can't make a comparison, sorry.
Very good review, I want that camera but the eye piece is very important for me outside.
It looks very tiny 0.24?
The one I have on my standard def. Vx2100 is 0.44 and is pretty good..
I just purchased this camera and so far I am loving it. Defiantly a image quality and operational step up in most aspects from my old sony hvr-zu1. For the price you cant beat this camera. All the options are there but you might have to dig for some of them. I also purchased a shoulder rig and I am looking for a good lanc remote for a decent price. Any suggestions that will work with the NX100?
I don't have any suggestions, sorry. I bought my Manfrotto 521 (i think it is) several years ago and it's still going strong!
So I almost have my money saved up and hope to be getting my first pro-level camcorder to go with my Canon 5d Mk 3 with prime lens set up. This is the second time watching this review. What is a step up from this but still close to it in price? And do you think Sony will announce a NX200 anytime soon ? Thanks again great job
They only just released this one so I doubt it. Next step maybe Panasonic's new HC-X1 but it's not even out yet so I can't say for sure. Specs look good though.
Hello, nice review!
One question are the active stabilization lets say a 5 axis stabilization? Because at most cameras with active stabilizer the up and down movement its ok but left and right seems that dont stabilize at all. I used yesterday a pxw-x70 and it seemed to stabilize very well left and right movements.
Hi, thanks. Sorry, can't remember the specifics. Suggest you look at the camera's page on the Sony website which should tell you. Cheers.
Hi,
comparing the fresh stabilisation tests fo the NX100 with those of the X70 you have done some time before, I have the impression, like if the X70 stabilisation were slightly better. Can you confirm it?
Thanks,
Nikola from Austria
Hi. Unfortunately it was a long time ago that I tested the X70 so I can't really make an informed comparison, sorry.
I watched a review of the Sony HXR-NX30. It was highlighted that the camera had a facial recognition ability and that the camera would stay focused on that face. The review also showed how the camera auto corrected very smoothly transitioning from a shadowy setting to a lighted setting. Can this camera do either of those?
+Sean Fliehman I don't recall if it has facial recognition, you're best to read the manual. Transitions from dark to light and vice versa are better done manually if possible.
Thanks for the review it was great help.
I was going for the xf200 but this camera seems to have a better lens.
I just ordered this camera as my first entry into a pro style camera. Between your review and others I have seen a lot of features and demos that answered my questions. One thing I am still wondering about, as I can not find the full user manual on Sony's website - does this camera feature night shot to record in total darkness? The phone rep at B&H said no, the online rep under the awnsered questions part said yes, but another use said no.
Do you know anything about this feature being on the camera? I have paranormal groups who are interested in it. Thanks for any replies!
+John Lockwood I don't believe it has, sorry.
+UKAirscapeThanks for the reply. I saw in another review video what
looked like night shot type of function, but it was presented in
Japanese, and I couldn't understand it. But this part of the video shows
what looks like night shot using the Low Lux button?
Ah, I can see how that could be used. The low lux mode, if I recall correctly, puts the camera largely into auto and cranks up the gain astronomically so as to give a picture in terrible light. It's not the same as "nightshot" mode which uses infra red but you might end up with similar results I suppose.
+UKAirscape Thanks for the replies. I'm suppose to be getting the camera
tomorrow. I'll be sure to go through it well and test everything out.
Thanks again! As someone new to shooting more pro style video, I enjoy
your channel very much! It helped me choose this camera as my first pro
level camera. Thanks again!
+UKAirscape Just received my NX100 today, and I can now conform it DOES indeed have inferred night shot on it. You put the camera into full auto mode, and then in the menus, you program the LUX button to activate the night shot mode. So it does indeed include inferred night vision.
Pleas I need more information about sony HXR- NX100
Hi There
I have a Z1 and have used it now for years with great success as a business youtube camera and presentations of products. I find the zoom, use of tapes and head cleaning a pain. Is this all eliminated and is this camera a better option for me considering the aforementioned?
Oh my goodness yes; any of the modern solid-state camcorders will not only provide a much easier and more reliable workflow than tapes but the advances in sensor and image processing technology will give you a much better and sharper image, especially in dim conditions. This particular camcorder isn't really the successor to the Z1 but is so much more advanced that it would still be a very substantial upgrade. Something like the Sony HXR-NX5 would be more akin to a modern Z1 for HD work, and a PXW-Z190 the same for 4K work.
Having said all that, I'm not sure what you mean about the zoom being a pain....?
Hi and thanks for the reply. I looked at a HXR-NX3 but it does not record in PAL I am led to understand. Does the HXR-NX5 record in PAL. Secondly is this important? I'm not sure I get the whole NTSC-PAL scenario here in OZ in respect to filming, editing on the PC with Premiere Pro and putting my vids on RUclips. I have no real need to put anything I do on DVD and if I did what's the problem. cheers and I appreciate your time
I'm pretty sure there is a PAL version of the NX3, we certainly have one here in the UK as far as I recall! If your videos are solely for RUclips or other computer use then the PAL/NTSC issue is utterly irrelevant UNLESS you plan to mix footage from different sources in which case you probably want them all to match. Otherwise you end up having to re-format one set of footage to the other set's framerate. In other words, if you shoot some at 25fps (pal) and other at 29.97 (ntsc), then your final timeline will have to be rendered at one or the other and the footage shot at whichever rate you don't choose will end up being re-encoded at the chosen frame rate which can look jerky.
Does it show the focus distance while recording at all time? Also if focus is set to manual, will it keep focus while zooming IN/OUT?
I don't recall whether it continually shows focus (I only had the camcorder on loan) but it keep focus throughout the zoom, as virtually all of these type of camcorders do.
hello, How is its Dynamic Range in sunny bright daylight ?
I didn't specifically measure it with any instruments. Seem to recall some of the test footage was shot in sunshine though, wasn't it?
I’m looking for a camcorder that gives me all the manual controls that I want, but still can be easy to use and gets good quality. All I really need is HD at 60 fps, so do you think this is worth the buy?
I'm not sure I recall this camcorder filming at 60fps, I'd check the specs if I were you. If it does, then it's a decent cam for the price (or was, when I last looked). Depends on what you're filming of course.
On the Sony website it says the NTSC model gets up to 60p and 60i...maybe you had the PAL model. I would mainly be filming trains/aircraft, so I would need the higher frame rate. Thanks for the reply!
Yes, I had the PAL model which does 50i but that is interlaced remember, so it's only equivalent to 25p / 30p. Not that same as 60p (60 complete progressive frames). If your output is to the web, then you need progressive, as you'd have to de-interlace "i" footage.
I didn’t think I would be using interlacing anyway, so that shouldn’t be a problem. This is my first time getting an actual video camera, so I want to make sure this is the right one for me. Thanks for helping me through this lol
Ah, I beg your pardon, I misread the spec!! Indeed the PAL model does do 50p in HD (and yours, as you say, does true 60p too). For its price, I liked this camcorder but it's certainly "entry level" as far as pro camcorders go. It's got the manual controls you'll want though and a decent image.
Another great, honest review, congrats!
Aside from the standard outdoors and indoors scenes, I shoot a lot of theater and concerts on stages that are often poorly lit. There are often very bright spotlights together with dimly lit areas of the stage. Those lighting conditions are challenging and require a camcorder with wide dynamic range to be able to balance the exposure and get acceptable white and black levels. Right now I am looking for a camcorder able to capture a Wide Dynamic Range, preferably 4K capable for future proofing. Have you had a chance to test the NX100 for its dynamic range? I would like to compare it with the Sony X70, JVC HM170 and the Canon XA30 (G40 in its just announced prosumer version). Of those four, the X70 and HM170 are 4K capable and would be preferred, if equally capable of capturing WDR. Thanks!
I didn't really get a chance to test dynamic range other than in those shots of the boats and the sky. Certainly didn't get to do any formal testing (and I'm not expert enough for those kind of labs tests anyway).
Your circumstances are of course the most difficult for any camcorder. I know the Canon G40 / XA30 has a wide dynamic range mode which might help but I've not tried it.
I wonder whether you wouldn't be better looking for something that shoots one of the log profiles (and then having to colour grade in editing, which needn't be difficult if you just want to expand the contrast, essentially). That would point you towards Panasonic's DVX200 in the camcorder shape or a GH4R / Sony A7Sii in stills-type. Much more expensive than your preferred options, sadly.
Do you have plans to review the Canon G40/xa30 soon?
+Frederic Berger I'd like to but I'm not going to fork out the cash myself and I don't have any contacts at Canon to lend me one so it may not happen. I can try emailing their press office again but it's never got me very far to date :-(
The NX3 has the same problem with the LCD screen/viewfinder. Drives me nuts.
People have been telling me it's solved on the production versions of the NX100 though I've not seen that myself.
This is the 2nd review I've watched about this camcorder. The viewfinder is a concern for me, as both reviews have made mention how bad it is. Have you reviewed or aware of another comparable camcorder without that issue...and is the pricing close? I would be using it for a lot of outdoor shooting that usally turns to dusk, then nightfall (outside events with stage lighting - concerts, other performances)....I looked up the Canon XF200, and too expensive for me at the moment....The Sony PXW X70 is also a tad high - I see only 1 ring on that model...interesting ???
The other review may have also been me, on my other channel (Tubeshootermag)! Other commenters have said their units were fine so maybe mine was an early model or something.
There's no comparably-priced cam that I know of though Panasonic do have a low cost camcorder but I've not tested their latest version.
The XF200 has poor low light performance, a really grainy image. I like the X70 a lot but as you say, it's slightly less ergonomic due to the single ring and it's slightly older now so the NX100 probably has better electronics inside.
The view finder issue can be solved by having a hand on flip out screen just before you go outside, so you can quickly flip it open.
More a workaround than a solve; it's not ideal!
UKAirscape that's true. Keep up the good work on your videos! And you're one of the few who still respond after the video is uploaded, keep it up!
Haha, I like responding (with sensible commenters). Haven't done any vids lately, there's not much low-end camcordery stuff coming out these days, it's all about mobile phones :-(
UKAirscape yeah, It's all mobile stuff. Or it's all about RED cameras, or big expensive rigs now... You should review the Panasonic AG-AC30 if you haven't already done it. For me, budget stuff is great, since I'm still in school, and $2,000+ cameras like the Sony NXR-NX5R are way out of my price range. That's why I love camera like these since it looks professional enough to look like you know what you're doing and maintain professionalism while keeping a lower budget.
Unfortunately, Panasonic have never loaned me any gear so I can only review from them what I buy with my own cash (ouch!) and the AG-AC30 is quite old now so it's not one I'll get. There are lots of reviews of it though; I think mostly positive, given the price.
Thank you … answered all my questions …
Sorry to bother you again, I need some advice. What's the best editing software for AVCHD and XAVCS for Mac. Thanks.
There is never one single "best" for anything else there'd only ever be one product on the market. Different software works well for different people. So it depends what you like, what you're used to and what you want to do. FCPX is very popular and not too costly. Adobe Premiere is also popular but you have to pay on a monthly subscription. Avid Media Composer would be the choice if you work in broadcast or film (and have deep pockets)
Thanks for the review, been looking at this camera for a while now, am going into professional music video production and want to use camcorders and not dlsr, do you think this camera will do a decent music video job or you prefer another one for 2000 euro or less, if you think dlsr is better for music video, which will u advice, thanks
Depends entirely on what you're shooting in the music video. You can't simply say any device is suitable "for music videos" as there are so many things that could encompass. Camcorders are good for ease of use and grabbing shots on the fly; DSLRs are good at making "pretty" shots when you have the time to set them up. It's horses for courses.
Good morning sir sorry for the delay
Great review as always. Thanks.
The G stands for Grace, Gather and Gratify which has to do with the underlying concept of its design.
Does it really??
UKAirscape Here's a link: www.sony-mea.com/microsite/dslr/09/gLens/
+Anton Zandt Interesting, cheers!
I'm torn between this and Panasonics AG AC30, whats your opinion?
I've not tested the Panasonic but I did really like the Sony especially at the price. It may depend simply on your personal experience and preference - are you a Sony fan or a Panasonic fan? What use do you intend to put it to?
what is the best option in your opinion the JVC GY-HM170 or the SONY HXR-NX100 ?
If you need 4K then you have to have the JVC (unless you increase the budget). If you only need HD then my preference would be the Sony.
Can I ask you which is the stability, steadiness, of this camera when not using the tripod?
Two stability modes: standard (not brilliant but OK for holding a wide-angle shot a bit firmer) and active which was much better but crops slightly in on the image. It's not a glidecam or gimbal quality, it's more like a normal camcorder stabiliser.
+UKAirscape Many thanks!!
+needcorrection Also, see now my new video of stabilisation tests: ruclips.net/video/SCvoZqvMqC0/видео.html
yes useful thanks, "send us a SD dvd," yup... Now if i remember correctly the old Sony VX2000 used to be lcd or viewfinder, but if you turn the LCD to face forwards the viewfinder would come on, does this lcd turn enough to face forwards? and if so does the viewfinder come on? we used to do that a l ot instead of opening and closing the lcd! Cheers great breakdown!
If you turn the LCD forwards, the image remains on the LCD so you can self-shoot a piece to camera.
yeah both would go on when you faced that one front
Fantastic and informative. Thank you for your time
Glad it was useful.
HI, Great review! I do have a Sony HDR-CX900. I've been very happy with it. According to the Sony website, the NX100 and the CX900 basically have the same censor, and pixel resolution. Is it really worth an upgrade as far as video resolution? Thank you.
+Joe Cifaldi With apologies, I don't understand your question. Since you've confirmed they're the same sensor, there will be no "upgrade as far as video resolution" by buying the NX100. What you're gaining is better physical controls.
Sorry, what I ment was would it be worth getting the NX100 if I already have the CX900, if there would be much of a difference in video quality. It does seem like the NX100 does have more bells and whistles.
+Joe Cifaldi I doubt there would be an appreciable improvement in video quality. What you gain is much better manual physical controls and the XLR audio inputs of course. The CX900's advantages are its inconspicuous and portable size.
Great, thanks for your help. I also do prefer the Zeiss lens over the G lens.
is there a interval rec mode ?
I don't recall, sorry. You'd better check the manual online.
So, would you recomend this or the Pxw-x70?
Depends what you need. The X70 is more compact, a great stealth camera. If you want a large unit, try this maybe.
+UKAirscape Ok thanks, 1. Thank you for responding, escpecially so quickly, and 2. Im planning on using it for short films, some stOhage performances and maybe a few other jobs. Being small and stealthy isnt a nessasity, but it would definitly be ok.
can the lens hood be removed from the camera? If i purchase this, I think I would replace the lens hood with a hood that has a flip cover.
I seem to recall it was packaged separately but whether you'd find another that would fit exactly I don't know.
+UKAirscape Thanks for the reply. I watched an unboxing video of this camera and the hood was already attached. I was hoping it would be removable.
Hmm, well now I'm starting to get paranoid that I've remembered incorrectly... do double check with the vendor before buying, just in case I'm being an idiot!
I have used a sony NX5U for years. I am looking at adding a second camera for some of my work. Would the video this captures be as good or noticeably worse than the NX5U. I know the Nx5U is discontinued and sony recommends the PXW, but I'm looking to add a second camera for a lot less cost.
+Ryan S Hi. I haven't done a direct comparison of the two but the NX100 has decent images in my opinion and since your criteria is "second camera for a lot less cost", I doubt you'll do any better than the NX100.
:-)
If you put the zoom to manual, is it a electronic servo zoom or real manual?
Servo; entirely typical for this type (and cost) of camcorder I'm afraid.
More about settings. If you were shooting perhaps a dog competition for a wealthy dog owner that would view the video on a large computer monitor and send out links to friends; what settings would you use? Would you use a tripod or monopod? What type of microphone?
+Ralph Bullis With apologies, those are all far too vast questions to be answered in a RUclips comment. And, I don't mean this nastily, but if you're unsure of whether to use a tripod or not or what kind of mic to use, are you sure you have the expertise to be shooting video for wealthy clients?
I'll try briefly to answer though: shoot in XAVC-S at 50Mbps. If you're in the arena following the dog around from 2-3 feet away, you'll do it handheld. If you're on the sidelines, then heavens yes you must use a tripod and a hefty, sturdy, professional one at that with a decent fluid head, because you're going to have to use a lot of zoom and be tracking the dog as it moves round.
Mic - depends whether you just want to capture the atmosphere of the arena (in which case the inbuilt one will do) or actually do any interviews in which case the answer requires more paragraphs than I've time to put here, really, and more detail about what you want to do.
+Ralph Bullis Oh, and shoot 50p too for smoother motion.
+Ralph Bullis Oh, and shoot 50p too for smoother motion.
this camera IS GOOD BUT in auto mode the camera skin tone is NOT stable is there are any correction IN SETTINGS PLEASE ?
I don't know what you mean by "not stable"' so unfortunately I don't know of any settings to correct what you're seeing.
My best guess to what he was saying that the skin tones were somehow shifting, like the skin would go to orange or something. so in that case, he probably meant he was having white balance issues.
Perfect review :)
Thank you.
I'd like to buy a shotgun external mic setup for this camera. Any suggestions for a good sounding one for indoor or outdoor use at an affordable price? RUclips videos and such. Wireless options also. Thanks.
I have no idea what your definition of "affordable" is unless you tell me.
Oh, and "RUclips videos" could mean anything. Please be specific else I can't help.
+UKAirscape Sorry to be vague, I'm a bit of a novice at the sound aspect. I would like to conduct interviews indoors for RUclips and outside NG documentary style footage. My budget is $500 U.S. Movie reviews, my friend and I talking on camera and occasional product reviews solo. Not camcorders, you're the clear expert at that. Thanks.
+SuperRtrtrtr With apologies I don't know what "NG documentaries" means (National Geographic??).
Indoors interviews I'd generally use a lavalier (tie clip) mic if there's time to attach it. Wireless ones save you the bother of trailing cords (and the interviewee walking off when still attached, only to yank the camera over!). Something like the RodeLink Wireless system could be good, I use one and like it. Hard to plug two of them in though if you want two channels.
For a shotgun, I'd look at something like a Rode NTG2 or maybe an Audio Technica AT875R. Make sure you buy a decent windjammer with it, something from Rycote. They're expensive but do a proper job. Cheap ones can be rubbish. They muffle the wind but muffle the sound as well!
If you're trying to capture sound from two of you, one mic isn't optimal though you can get away with it if you're careful with placement. Don't just rely on the mic being on top of the camera unless you're right in front of it; mics need to be close to work properly.
+UKAirscape I meant News Gathering. Sorry. I appreciate your help and patience.
hy.what do you choose between sony nx100 and panasonic ag ux90? i do not need to shoot 4k.i see you review both. i need an honest opinion.
It would depend on what you want to shoot and your budget and personal preference.
UKAirscape i will use it to shoot events and my daughter performance in martial arts .in this moment i own a canon ,but in low light its not so good. i tried to shoot with a reflex but its to much a problem setting focus and al that stuff. that being said what do you think? nx100 or ux90.best regards
I'd suggest the NX100 is better in low light because it has cleaner gain (in my opinion)
What model of Manfrotto Lanc controller is compatible with this Camera?
No idea. I presume any standard LANC controller would do it but perhaps best to email Manfrotto directly.
No idea. I presume any standard LANC controller would do it but perhaps best to email Manfrotto directly.
People talk about BBC hd broadcast standards being 50mbps and 4.2.2 colour. This does 4.2.0. Do you think that matters...if you were to shoot a great looking documentary with brilliant content, would it still pass their standards?
I think if you were commissioned to produce a doc for the BBC they'd want it done on a rather more expensive camera than this, say a PXW-X180 or similar. I recall that its predecessor, the PMW-180 was the first and lowest cost (at £5k ish) camcorder to meet the broadcast spec.
That said, were you to present some footage of a "must see" event eg in a news capacity filmed on this camcorder then the rules would go straight out of the window and they'd snap it up. Let's face it, mobile phone footage is OK for news use!
Oddly, the whole 50Mbps thing really is a red herring because of the advances in codecs. When it was specified, camcorders were using MPEG-2, and now H.264 achieves comparable results in half the but rate so a 50Mbps XAVC-S recording should easily exceed a 50Mbps MPEG-2 file :-)
Have you ever used the Panasonic AG-AC30? I hear it is better than the Sony NX100.
Not used but I'd seriously doubt it's better. It's a much older model, with much smaller sensors, albeit three small versus the Sony's one large one. No doubt Panasonic fans would rage at me for saying so though.
The AG-AC30 is a year newer than the SONY NX100 and what I read in reviews the Sony NX100 is terrible in auto focus so it would be no good for shooting sports.
I beg your pardon, I was thinking of the AG-AC90! My mistake. Either way, I have not had a chance to compare the two, unfortunately :-(
How did you find the auto focus on the Sony NX100?
It was a long time ago that I had it on loan so I don't recall, sorry. I tend to shoot manual focus generally.
nice review . is the camcorder has a touch focus technology? where you touch the subject it will focus automatically to the subject?
No, it does not have a touchscreen.
how does it compare with the canon xa 30 and the sony pxw-70?
The XA is much more compact. The X70 is also more compact and can do 4K (with an upgrade) as well as 4:2:2 colour I think. This is a cheap but good HD ENG cam.
thanks for answering . I just wonder which one is better in Image quality, low light performance and more versatile? is it the nx100 or the x70? :)
Bravo ... i think one of the best review of a camcorder (either good or bad camcorder), you speak very logicaly about everything (specialy for the 4k). We shoot with dslrs (without 4k) and the clients are very happy with the results... I have thoughts to buy this camera for events (school and sports events) but also for weddings.... What is your opinion ... ??? Thank you.
Thank you. I think that provided you know what you're doing and therefore what it is you're buying (and what it is not eg massively shallow depth of field) then it would be fine. You might still want your DSLR for wedding "beauty shots" but this would make a fine rolling record of "as it happens" stuff.
One potential downside I suppose would be that as the lens is purely servo driven (no manual option as with higher priced camcorders) you can't crash zoom in and out to reframe which can sometimes be useful in live event videography.
Thanks for the quick reply .. I think for the privileges of a pure camcorder camera (and for this price)I will have to sustain the downside of it (hardly any shallow depth of field, fixed lens and more ..). thanks again.
Thank you! great video
Great review thanks :)
:-)
Please help me! I just recorded video for the first time using this video camera and for the life of me, I simply cannot get the footage off of the video camera.
- First I attempted to connect the camera directly to my iMac. But everything in the instruction manual shows only how to (view) the footage on my computer screen. (which is useless to me if I can't get it off/out of the video camera.
- Then I purchased a flash card reader and sure enough I can see all the folders on the card - and everyone of them display on my computer as ("empty"). I was shocked and began sweating and stressing out! Had I screwed up and not really recorded anything????
- I took the SD card out of the flash card reader, put it back into the video camera, pressed "Thumbnails" and presto!... There is all of the footage I shot.
- I can clearly see it on the camera, but I can't get it out of there!
- I've done a ton of Google searches and NOBODY explains how to get the stupid footage off of this camera.
- There are multiple videos on RUclips explaining the basic operation of this camera and so-called "QuickStart" methods - And still, nobody tells you how to get the stupid footage off of this camera!
I've tried calling Sony Tech Support and was transferred 4 times because they kept telling me "we're sorry, that's professional equipment so we have to transfer you to a different department. Once I finally got to the right department, they told me to leave a message and someone would get back to me in 24. hours. That never happened and I'm still here now nearly a week after these incredibly important and time sensitive videos, still trying to get the stupid footage off of this camera.
PLEASE, PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!
What video format did you shoot in? (It makes a difference to how the files are stored on the cards).
Sony's new HXR-NX5R is coming out soon. Is Sony going to loan you one for review?
Don't know. I might drop them an email.
For only an additional $300 why would someone buy this over the X70? Personally I was hoping Sony would put the X70 Specs in this form factor. Shrug. Looks Like I am buy the X70...
Thanks for the detailed overview!
Cheers,
Greg
UKAirscape I was sort of hoping you would elaborate on that a bit since you have reviewed both...
+Greg Allen There's not much elaboration to be made. The X70 is more compact, 4K-upgradeable and has HD-SDI. The NX100 is cheaper and has more extensive manual controls. Whichever is right for you will depend on your needs and circumstances.
Got this for 1260GBP new from ebay, including shipping. Hope I made the right choice, can't wait till it's here.
That's an absolute steal!
UKAirscape Which is why I went out of my way to get it now - Originally didn't plan to get it until next month so I had to borrow some money to buy it now, heh. Did you play around with the picture profiles at all?
Didn't have much time to, really. I had a look and it seemed similar to the PXW-X70 which has a fair degree of customisation.
Nice review. I thought Jordan's 3rd worst camera assessment failed to judge it on its merits. Jordan is using an FS7 using gimbals and color grading log files. Probably more that 90% of us need or wish to bother with.
Nice toys but as you say, not necessarily what many folk are using. Thanks.
I want indoor settings......
Thanks!
I'm so glad YOU did this review as you always manage to give us such comprehensive information without muddling about.
I did watch another review which compared the HXR-NX100 to the HDR-CX900 ruclips.net/video/M5ER6cC7c_M/видео.html and by golly you really cant pick the picture difference on You Tube. The NX100 is AU$600 more and you get 3 manual lens rings, more manual control, dual card slots, Pro Audio, so I suppose it's a pretty good deal. But the PXW-X70 is only another AU$250 more, it has less controls like the CX900 but I assume it has much better pictures. Ah the dilemma of trying to choose which camera next. :-)
+Mervyn Jack Thank you! I don't think the picture's particularly better on the X70, they're all much of a muchness. The X70 brings you a much more ergonomic and sensibly thought out camcorder than the CX900, plus pro audio. It also has the 4K (paid) option. The NX100 offers those manual controls. Your needs and experience should make the choice for you ;-) Good luck.
Nice review. For starting up on Video :) thanx
How to update nx100
Good job
Panasonic, as you probably know, has a new HD cam, AG-AC30. If Panasonic doesn't loan you one to review, I'll assume it's junk.
Sadly, Panasonic have never loaned me any gear for review, despite emailed requests. Indeed, they've never even acknowledged me :-(