I dont like breadtube but you dont know what praxis means because its literally the opposite of what you are saying. Practice is literally putting the ideas and theories you have into action.
Sadly. RUclips presence should never be a judgment/measuring stick- butbit does enable (discerning) people to see whether someone knows their $#!+. Those are not, of course, the people that usually get popular. Audiences tend to lean more sycophantic (towards people who make them feel smart) vs. Those who want to challange and be challenged (and most creators, even subconsciously, lean into audiences the feed their egos) Seeing exceptions on either side is refreshing.
Oh, they are like clouds of locusts in some parts of London. During lock down when people had nothing better to do the only newspapers you'd see left on the newsstand by midday was the Guardian, so in touch with the beating heart of society you would struggle to give that chattering class rag away.
@WhatifAltHist yeah but historians are important especially those who can explain it in a way that normies like us can understand. I'm a child of african immigrants and the cultural differences between American and African cultures like Africans having higher respect for elders, higher aggressiveness, tonal languages, fear and shame based culture, clan family culture are stuff I subconsciously knew but whatifalthist when explained it to me in family structure vid, emotions that society vid I recognized these consciencely improving my relations with my parents
Who ends up being in the Chattering Classes? -I noticed since the 1980s, from time to time a survey would come out, saying 80% of people in media were liberal. -I noticed that the college educated are now the only ones that end up in the Chattering Class -I noticed that Jordan Peterson once said that when he taught at Harvard, almost all his students had parents in the economic top 1% -I noticed that most of the people who go to college are from the upper classes -I noticed that Victor Davis Hanson said in his last interview with Megyn Kelly, that people are voting on class lines now, with the upper class college educated mostly identifying as Democrat -I noticed that Charles Murray wrote a book, Coming Apart, on how the classes were separating, coming apart, were now marrying mostly within their class -I noticed that Anderson Cooper's mom was Gloria Vanderbilt, of old American money -I noticed that 90% of people at Ivy League Schools identify as liberal -I noticed that people from the Ivy Leagues form a large part of the chattering class -I noticed that much of the elite in the Kennedy era, they had working class roots, but now our elite does not -I noticed that parents try to do the best for their children, give them a leg up in life, will often do things that give their children advantage -I noticed that colleges now teach a version of reality that is based on feminism, demonizing white straight Christians, especially men -I noticed that women now vastly outnumber men at college -I noticed that everyone's perception of life is based on their own personal life experience -I noticed that life is best understood, not by theories, which can largely be manipulated, but by personal experience So...who are in our chattering classes? The upper class. Rich entitled spoiled people, many of them women now. Who grow up in privilege. Are often liberal or progressive. Who have every advantage in life. Who come from stable, well off, two parent families in the upper class. Who have no life experience with the lives of most Americans. Who are naïve and entitled. Who are gullible, will believe all sorts of nonsense....with little life experience, by which they can check, what I call....their Delusion Privilege. Who have a profound sense of self-importance. Often highly compassionate, they are not able to think through why the things they propose, such as DEI, are highly racist, offensive, misandrist. All their natural Upper Class White Privilige blinds them to things, outside their bubble of Privilege. How they are mostly unaware of the cruel, racist, classist implications of what they believe in. Who are often arrogant Karens...well intentioned, but think they know more about your reality, than you do...and intend to manage your reality, for your benefit. The Chattering Classes are aligned with the Managerial Class, as Vivek Ramaswamy has pointed out. Washington DC and the MSM are great money making and privilege machines, manipulating the economy and public perception, in order to further the status and economic interests of the most privilege Americans. They think they are America, they don't have a clue of the lives or opinions of the average American. They have a superiority complex that their children inherit. This election in some ways is an attempt at answering the question: does America have a permanent set of a ruling class? ...Who mostly run America, get all the money, bend public policy for their own prestige and economic interests? Do ordinary voters still count? Are we allowed to vote for someone to promote our interests, the interests of ordinary people? Or do the people at the top have a permanent advantage, are we becoming a class based feudal society....much like India with it's Caste System?...with lower class white males being the equivalent of the Untouchable in India?
Yes, but condescension is available for ppl of any kind of background. I suppose it’s merely an issue of severity and whether or not they participate in the search for resolutions…etc… or are essentially useless.
I remember hearing years ago that a theory ceases being a theory if you ignore the data that opposes it. Holding onto a theory irrespective of facts and data that defeats it is mere ideology. A lot of people in the chattering class love their ideology because there's no obligation for it to be logically congruent with reality, it only needs to be logically congruent with itself.
The best part is only they can pass laws to control or limit themselves, so they never will. The point of being in the legislature is to partake in insider trading and make connections. Policy is tertiary
Some people don’t take control of their lives and dont develop virtues. They often use conversation to judge or assess other people, since they don’t have the ability to have the ability to talk about ideas.
But apparently nature selected for them, over billions of years, so what use must they offer to the species? It should be assumed therefore that for the survival of the existence of the baboon's species, the chattering classes offers an evolutionary advantage. What evolutionary advantage does the chattering classes offer for the species's survival?
In other words: people who are decoupled from the consequences of their opinions and choices. Btw, this group is growing in size, and by design. Grown-ups in the West are being infantilized, artificially held in a state of permanent childhood. The idea is, that an eternal juvenile will seek shelter with an adult figure (personified by the ever growing nanny state). That’s why we have increasing push for censorship (God forbid grown-ups would be exposed to ideas that might seduce them), push for centralizing everything, push for sheltering grown-ups from the consequences of their life’s choices. The powers-that-be desire a population consisting of immature, pliable, scared, isolated individuals, who are unable to think autonomously and critically, who are unable to organize, who are unable to argue constructively. And they’re getting it.
It's a concept called "luxury beliefs," and it's the only "moral" thing that the rich can do now to display said wealth since the 2008 recession. This is a shift from the luxury goods that ruled the West for centuries. The thinking used to be "I have so much time and money that I can wait for products from the other side of the world with little to no consequences" to "I have so much time and money that I can believe whatever I want with little to no consequences." These "luxury beliefs" are beliefs that, if applied to the mainstream, would have widespread, devastating consequences, such as transgenderism and the new "Green Deal."
One of the defining things for when I realized the news media was mostly BS was when I started to notice that news outlets would report on something from the previous weekend's SNL as if it were actual news.
I once dated a social worker who introduced me to that term. The context was on a date where she first aired her superior political views. We talked about a few headline issues and she was all this side are cretins, my side are unassailable. Later, we went back to my place and she got undressed. She was wearing very fancy Agent Provocateur lingerie. Look it up. It’s the trashiest most stereotyped aesthetic on earth. So that’s what I think of people who use that term. Check their underwear. The lengths people will go to impress. That was the third date. There was no fourth date.
I follow Peter Zeihan regularly, and he seems more insightful than most members of the chattering class. But his tone is so blasé (e.g., when speculating about famine in China) that I can't shake off the perception that he is still part of the chattering class.
The problem with this view is that YOU are a part of the chattering classes. And you too, and you too. The chatter has moved into the internet. I do get the criticism, and agree with it, but I think this is a part of the human condition.
![[Special Clip] ATEEZ(에이티즈) 홍중 'Why Do You Love'](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/I6XYXQKN_pY/mqdefault.jpg)
Mao didn't get much right but his policy of sending the chattering class to the rice paddies was spot on
...except that it's what gave us "Xi Xinping Thought."
@@normanclatcher I think that you think you're making a point...
Welp off to the rice paddies for us. You.
@@Nightdiver20 ...learn your history~
@@normanclatcher oooh. That's deep.
Essentially Breadtube. There's a reason their obsessed with praxis.
They also circle jerk Lenin
I dont like breadtube but you dont know what praxis means because its literally the opposite of what you are saying. Practice is literally putting the ideas and theories you have into action.
A high price on the whispers of fools.
A full-time history RUclipsr is surely the definition of a chatterer though.
Yes
Nice ur honest @@WhatifAltHist
@@WhatifAltHistI Nigerian and I have to say that trump getting full immunity sounds like something that would happen here
@@femiade1000every president has always had immunity, otherwise Obama would be in prison for ending American kids.
Sadly. RUclips presence should never be a judgment/measuring stick- butbit does enable (discerning) people to see whether someone knows their $#!+. Those are not, of course, the people that usually get popular. Audiences tend to lean more sycophantic (towards people who make them feel smart) vs. Those who want to challange and be challenged (and most creators, even subconsciously, lean into audiences the feed their egos) Seeing exceptions on either side is refreshing.
Youre one of the modern chattering classes
Genuinely, you put that quite well. Good job from Ireland 🇮🇪👍
Oh, they are like clouds of locusts in some parts of London. During lock down when people had nothing better to do the only newspapers you'd see left on the newsstand by midday was the Guardian, so in touch with the beating heart of society you would struggle to give that chattering class rag away.
Politics in a nutshell.
And it's always the same people ending up there.
You're part of the chattering class too Rudy
yes
@@WhatifAltHistI like the honesty
@WhatifAltHist yeah but historians are important especially those who can explain it in a way that normies like us can understand. I'm a child of african immigrants and the cultural differences between American and African cultures like Africans having higher respect for elders, higher aggressiveness, tonal languages, fear and shame based culture, clan family culture are stuff I subconsciously knew but whatifalthist when explained it to me in family structure vid, emotions that society vid I recognized these consciencely improving my relations with my parents
i can talk to the Earth and y'all are screwed
I felt like a crazy person he didn't mention this himself
What ever happened to the guy who commented “get in the gym Rudyard on every short?” Missing you bud, wherever you are.
Chattering: CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, Democrats, Biden, Disney.
Who ends up being in the Chattering Classes?
-I noticed since the 1980s, from time to time a survey would come out, saying 80% of people in media were liberal.
-I noticed that the college educated are now the only ones that end up in the Chattering Class
-I noticed that Jordan Peterson once said that when he taught at Harvard, almost all his students had parents in the economic top 1%
-I noticed that most of the people who go to college are from the upper classes
-I noticed that Victor Davis Hanson said in his last interview with Megyn Kelly, that people are voting on class lines now, with the upper class college educated mostly identifying as Democrat
-I noticed that Charles Murray wrote a book, Coming Apart, on how the classes were separating, coming apart, were now marrying mostly within their class
-I noticed that Anderson Cooper's mom was Gloria Vanderbilt, of old American money
-I noticed that 90% of people at Ivy League Schools identify as liberal
-I noticed that people from the Ivy Leagues form a large part of the chattering class
-I noticed that much of the elite in the Kennedy era, they had working class roots, but now our elite does not
-I noticed that parents try to do the best for their children, give them a leg up in life, will often do things that give their children advantage
-I noticed that colleges now teach a version of reality that is based on feminism, demonizing white straight Christians, especially men
-I noticed that women now vastly outnumber men at college
-I noticed that everyone's perception of life is based on their own personal life experience
-I noticed that life is best understood, not by theories, which can largely be manipulated, but by personal experience
So...who are in our chattering classes? The upper class. Rich entitled spoiled people, many of them women now. Who grow up in privilege. Are often liberal or progressive. Who have every advantage in life. Who come from stable, well off, two parent families in the upper class. Who have no life experience with the lives of most Americans. Who are naïve and entitled. Who are gullible, will believe all sorts of nonsense....with little life experience, by which they can check, what I call....their Delusion Privilege. Who have a profound sense of self-importance. Often highly compassionate, they are not able to think through why the things they propose, such as DEI, are highly racist, offensive, misandrist. All their natural Upper Class White Privilige blinds them to things, outside their bubble of Privilege. How they are mostly unaware of the cruel, racist, classist implications of what they believe in. Who are often arrogant Karens...well intentioned, but think they know more about your reality, than you do...and intend to manage your reality, for your benefit.
The Chattering Classes are aligned with the Managerial Class, as Vivek Ramaswamy has pointed out. Washington DC and the MSM are great money making and privilege machines, manipulating the economy and public perception, in order to further the status and economic interests of the most privilege Americans.
They think they are America, they don't have a clue of the lives or opinions of the average American. They have a superiority complex that their children inherit. This election in some ways is an attempt at answering the question: does America have a permanent set of a ruling class? ...Who mostly run America, get all the money, bend public policy for their own prestige and economic interests? Do ordinary voters still count? Are we allowed to vote for someone to promote our interests, the interests of ordinary people? Or do the people at the top have a permanent advantage, are we becoming a class based feudal society....much like India with it's Caste System?...with lower class white males being the equivalent of the Untouchable in India?
Yes, but condescension is available for ppl of any kind of background. I suppose it’s merely an issue of severity and whether or not they participate in the search for resolutions…etc… or are essentially useless.
@@TheWorldBelow360 We must never demonize the well off. There are good people in every class, every background, both genders. Absolutely.
The yapping classes
Thats a beautiful analogy hut i would put us in the sense making class.
We think more than we talk with the aim at finding the better argument.
I think this sums up most of the American citizenry under the age of 40
I remember hearing years ago that a theory ceases being a theory if you ignore the data that opposes it. Holding onto a theory irrespective of facts and data that defeats it is mere ideology.
A lot of people in the chattering class love their ideology because there's no obligation for it to be logically congruent with reality, it only needs to be logically congruent with itself.
Most states/provinces are heavily influenced by the chattering classes
The best part is only they can pass laws to control or limit themselves, so they never will. The point of being in the legislature is to partake in insider trading and make connections. Policy is tertiary
You are describing makers and takers. Takers always come out on top as makers are too busy being useful.
Some people don’t take control of their lives and dont develop virtues. They often use conversation to judge or assess other people, since they don’t have the ability to have the ability to talk about ideas.
“The media is less a window on reality, than a stage on which officials and journalists perform self-scripted, self-serving fictions.”-Thomas Sowell
But apparently nature selected for them, over billions of years, so what use must they offer to the species? It should be assumed therefore that for the survival of the existence of the baboon's species, the chattering classes offers an evolutionary advantage.
What evolutionary advantage does the chattering classes offer for the species's survival?
In other words: people who are decoupled from the consequences of their opinions and choices.
Btw, this group is growing in size, and by design. Grown-ups in the West are being infantilized, artificially held in a state of permanent childhood. The idea is, that an eternal juvenile will seek shelter with an adult figure (personified by the ever growing nanny state).
That’s why we have increasing push for censorship (God forbid grown-ups would be exposed to ideas that might seduce them), push for centralizing everything, push for sheltering grown-ups from the consequences of their life’s choices.
The powers-that-be desire a population consisting of immature, pliable, scared, isolated individuals, who are unable to think autonomously and critically, who are unable to organize, who are unable to argue constructively.
And they’re getting it.
It's a concept called "luxury beliefs," and it's the only "moral" thing that the rich can do now to display said wealth since the 2008 recession. This is a shift from the luxury goods that ruled the West for centuries. The thinking used to be "I have so much time and money that I can wait for products from the other side of the world with little to no consequences" to "I have so much time and money that I can believe whatever I want with little to no consequences." These "luxury beliefs" are beliefs that, if applied to the mainstream, would have widespread, devastating consequences, such as transgenderism and the new "Green Deal."
CHATTERING is often VIRTUE SIGNALING.
Tolkien called them Hobbits.
SNL and the guardian😂😂 what
You have broken the Supreme Court secret cipher!
One of the defining things for when I realized the news media was mostly BS was when I started to notice that news outlets would report on something from the previous weekend's SNL as if it were actual news.
It sounds like fellow Baby Boomers. I may be like that too,
I like this one too.
Rudyard brings reality daily.
The name of this class is Talking Heads
Sounds a lot like the media today... Sad...
I once dated a social worker who introduced me to that term. The context was on a date where she first aired her superior political views. We talked about a few headline issues and she was all this side are cretins, my side are unassailable. Later, we went back to my place and she got undressed. She was wearing very fancy Agent Provocateur lingerie. Look it up. It’s the trashiest most stereotyped aesthetic on earth. So that’s what I think of people who use that term. Check their underwear. The lengths people will go to impress. That was the third date. There was no fourth date.
I Don’t really see the problem with the lingerie. I mean it was the third date. She wanted to look sexy. She does sound cringe and annoying though.
AP used to be the nicest lingerie 15yrs ago. Now it’s shit.
I think those are one kind the other are shitposters, RUclipsrs, that sort of thing.
Does 4chan count as well?
Class war now
Been in two fully taken over chattering neighborhoods. Not pretty and the kids or weak are the first to suffer.
Even the chattering classes have a purpose. That’s why they exist.
☕️
oh it's you
The yap class
The View?
😂imagine the US goes to shit and other nations are try to keep us out
I follow Peter Zeihan regularly, and he seems more insightful than most members of the chattering class.
But his tone is so blasé (e.g., when speculating about famine in China) that I can't shake off the perception that he is still part of the chattering class.
Make a video about this
Women ☕
The problem with this view is that YOU are a part of the chattering classes. And you too, and you too. The chatter has moved into the internet. I do get the criticism, and agree with it, but I think this is a part of the human condition.
I like how every video you end up listing things on your hand in the dumbest possible way
integrating lists and setting expectations is an essential part of structuring short form content and speeches
I imagine the dumbest way possible to be randomly selecting fingers and toes to count on. I was disappointed when he didn't do this.
He is a thinker a visionary he doesn't depends on older terms for his reaserach and content he has his own@@inheritedwheel2900
Dude, stop making these shorts. They are way too addicting.
I dated her
Thr. UN & Nato.. Useless. Waste of. Money .!.!
So, you are talking about yourself again.
This guy has zero self awareness.
Not one of your best takes. Comes off as arrogant and dismissive.
Or just true.
Look in the mirror dude.
Go to gym
Just like you tube