Prehistoric Liners' old Titanic breakup theory (underwater view)

[@prehistoricliners6717]

Wow this is awesome thanks crunch

[@YT_DogePlayzOfficial]

Yea

[@Wolfric_Rogers]

I just realised that I placed the port and starboard propellers too far forward...
I'll have to fix that.

[@LevelRevels]

Beginning review: Heh, That theory doesn't look bad at all, It looks-
Split review: *WHAT DA KEEL DOIN?! WHAT DA AFT DOIN?! WHAT DA FALLING DOWN DOIN?!*

[@mikedev69]

It’s alot accurate to what the passengers described.

[@Wolfric_Rogers]

Thanks!

[@yiman7370]

Hmm hard to believe because if it was the case then the stern wouldn't have sank after the breakup because the ester level then is under E deck so the compartments would have stayed dried

[@IloveCruiseShips1912]

@@yiman7370 The reason the stern went vertical was due to the weight of the engines when water entered the room where the turning engines were. If the forward end of the watertight bulkheads was under, the stern would have gone vertical 30 seconds after break but many witnesses said it was horizontal for a minute before it began to rise.

[@Emperor_Creeper]

Wonderful animation, and a good theory!

[@Glitchtroll]

I like how one funnel spewed out water

[@Wolfric_Rogers]

That was coal dust being thrown from the uptake as it came apart, not water.

[@ELRONDGASAL]

Epic

[@sebbasttardo_]

Epic good job 💪😎

[@Ever_2008_ARG]

I'm really loving this side view of your model, it makes it look 2D

[@czechpendolino2160]

nice

[@rafiqstarline]

Nice!

[@titanicandothershipstudies4202]

That’s looking good

[@TRealAragornTTE]

Realistic theory

[@quited318]

Not 1910 remember

[@ANTlQUA]

This is a great theory but i have a question.
What is the reason for the bow plunging so fast to the bottom

[@Wolfric_Rogers]

It just doesn't recover from the cant. All of the water rushing in makes it sink like a stone.

[@ANTlQUA]

@@Wolfric_Rogers that makes sense
Thanks for the extra knowledge

[@BryanGeisler]

hmm.. interesting...

[@1stofficer_sonicexe]

hi

[@Wolfric_Rogers]

Hi.

[@Skylers_Animations_Editz]

What animation software did you use!

[@40308FGD]

Прямо как моя версия

[@40308FGD]

*old*
Старая

[@MB-us2rs]

Question, how does the stern settle back like that?

[@Wolfric_Rogers]

Like what?

[@MB-us2rs]

@@Wolfric_Rogers 0:07

[@Wolfric_Rogers]

@@MB-us2rs, because it's not being pulled anymore.

[@MB-us2rs]

@@Wolfric_Rogers wouldn’t the water keep it vertical tho?

[@Wolfric_Rogers]

No, there isn't that much water in it.

[@LynnTrumble]

Titanic sank in 1912 tho

[@TDadoRBX]

Its the channel name of the guy who made the theory

[@LynnTrumble]

@@TDadoRBX oh

[@prehistoricliners6717]

@@TDadoRBX Correct

[@ItsFerdiNah]

Uh.
The lights?

[@Wolfric_Rogers]

Read the description.

[@ItsFerdiNah]

@@Wolfric_Rogers Yeah but you could've also set a lighting like the James Cameron movie after the breakup, cause the timing when the lights go out is also part of the theory.

[@Wolfric_Rogers]

The lights don't go out in this animation. I wanted everything to be visible to show off the theory.

[@hannahleah756]

Realistic fairy be like

[@1stofficer_sonicexe]

First?

[@rafiqstarline]

Yes you are!