1. Albert Pujols 2. Lou Gehrig 3. Jimmy Foxx 4. Hank Greenberg 5. Cap Anson 6. Frank Thomas 7. Jim Thome 8. Miguel Cabrera 9. Eddie Murray 10. Willie McCovey
Worst list I've ever seen. No one on there right mind would take Ernie Banks over Stan Musial. Makes 0 sense. By the same token if someone believes Eddie Murray, Eddie Freaking Murray is better than Albert Pujols they need their head examined. The idea now, that Eddie Murray is better than Pujols is absurd. Pujols has at least 9 seasons better than Murray's best season. Banks is a SS for crying out loud. Disgrace of a list.
Javier Mora fuck no babe, look a Albert Pujols numbers. Over 600 hr and doubles, over 2000 RBI. Look bottom line Gehrig was good and all but his number don’t even come close to Albert.
@@pablopereyra3413 Heck no. First off, Gehrig had something called ALS that cut his career short. Took about 7-8 years off his career. So you can’t look at totals, as pujols has had almost 3,000 more at bats. So while pujols has more total home runs, Gehrig homered at a better rate. Pujols homered about once every 16.5 times at bat, while Gehrig homered about once every 16.2 times. Gehrig holds the edge. Gehrig also has 4 seasons with 45+ home runs, while pujols only had 3. Same with RBI’s and doubles. Gehrig RBI’s once every 4.0 times at bat, while pujols RBI’s once every 5.2 times at bat. Not even close, Gehrig is far superior at driving in runs. Pujols never even had 1 season with 150+ RBI’s. Gehrig had 7 seasons where he had at least 150! Gehrig doubled every 15.0 times at bat, while pujols doubled every 16.2 times at bat. Yet again Gehrig holds the advantage. And you also forgot to mention triples for some reason. Pujols has 16 career triples. While Gehrig has 162. Over 10 times as many! He has 3 seasons where he had more triples in it that pujols has in his hole career! This is just the top of the iceberg. Let’s look at their efficiency. First off, batting average. Gehrig had a .340 lifetime. Pujols has a .299. Gehrig by over .40. Slugging: Gehrig at .632 (3rd best all time), pujols at .546. Gehrig has a .86 advantage, which yet again isn’t even close. On base percentage. Lou Gehrig at .447, pujols at .377. Gehrig with a .70 advantage. Yet again, Gehrig easily over pujols, demonstrating that what you said is wrong, and in fact it’s the other way around if you look at the stats correctly. Pujols’ numbers don’t come close to Gehrig’s.
1. Lou Gehrig, 2. Albert Pujols, 3. Jimmie Foxx, 4. Willie McCovey... Banks played SS over half his career, and Musial played LF most of his career
1. Albert Pujols
2. Lou Gehrig
3. Jimmy Foxx
4. Hank Greenberg
5. Cap Anson
6. Frank Thomas
7. Jim Thome
8. Miguel Cabrera
9. Eddie Murray
10. Willie McCovey
McGriff over Bagwell? Trippin
No Sisler, No Greenberg, no Helton, No Bagwell. what were you thinking?
mighy
no miggy
Grande entre los grandes del mundo ,bendiciones para todos ellos,10;23PM,11/7/2018/,Raleigh,NC.
George Sisler?
Musial is a Left Fielder and Banks is a Shortstop.
+SquirtleGamers2001 I mean "was"
TheExorcist2016 earny banks was a first baseman to
They Could Play Both
Worst list I've ever seen. No one on there right mind would take Ernie Banks over Stan Musial. Makes 0 sense. By the same token if someone believes Eddie Murray, Eddie Freaking Murray is better than Albert Pujols they need their head examined. The idea now, that Eddie Murray is better than Pujols is absurd. Pujols has at least 9 seasons better than Murray's best season.
Banks is a SS for crying out loud. Disgrace of a list.
Don mattingly?
Banks must be on the SS list not on the 1st baseman list and Stan Musial on the left fielder list. But yes Gehrig is the best all time.
Javier Mora fuck no babe, look a Albert Pujols numbers. Over 600 hr and doubles, over 2000 RBI. Look bottom line Gehrig was good and all but his number don’t even come close to Albert.
@@pablopereyra3413
Heck no. First off, Gehrig had something called ALS that cut his career short. Took about 7-8 years off his career. So you can’t look at totals, as pujols has had almost 3,000 more at bats. So while pujols has more total home runs, Gehrig homered at a better rate. Pujols homered about once every 16.5 times at bat, while Gehrig homered about once every 16.2 times. Gehrig holds the edge. Gehrig also has 4 seasons with 45+ home runs, while pujols only had 3. Same with RBI’s and doubles. Gehrig RBI’s once every 4.0 times at bat, while pujols RBI’s once every 5.2 times at bat. Not even close, Gehrig is far superior at driving in runs. Pujols never even had 1 season with 150+ RBI’s. Gehrig had 7 seasons where he had at least 150! Gehrig doubled every 15.0 times at bat, while pujols doubled every 16.2 times at bat. Yet again Gehrig holds the advantage. And you also forgot to mention triples for some reason. Pujols has 16 career triples. While Gehrig has 162. Over 10 times as many! He has 3 seasons where he had more triples in it that pujols has in his hole career! This is just the top of the iceberg. Let’s look at their efficiency. First off, batting average. Gehrig had a .340 lifetime. Pujols has a .299. Gehrig by over .40. Slugging: Gehrig at .632 (3rd best all time), pujols at .546. Gehrig has a .86 advantage, which yet again isn’t even close. On base percentage. Lou Gehrig at .447, pujols at .377. Gehrig with a .70 advantage. Yet again, Gehrig easily over pujols, demonstrating that what you said is wrong, and in fact it’s the other way around if you look at the stats correctly. Pujols’ numbers don’t come close to Gehrig’s.
allllll of cap ansons stats are wrong
It's funny because it's true