He didn’t care. To him it was “how much money would you spend to save a friendship.” But forreal, I think they were all thinking “no one knows if it was the son, but there’s a pretty good chance…”
@Bishop545454 While at work, someone wanted to show me pictures of a wedding. I didn't know that it wasn't her ipad, and she dropped it on the floor and wanted to just put it back. I felt bad and paid for a new one...
I agree. I am a single woman living alone. This is a grown woman with a grown husband living with another family. The money you spending on furniture should be for deposit on an apartment.
I'll say this, IF i did not take anything, i would NOT offer to pay for anything! PERIOD! That very response to take accountability for something you claim you had no parts of seems EXTREMELY suspicious!
No I totally understand and I agree with you but also, she could have been a loving friend that wanted to make sure her friend was compensated for a huge loss but I also wouldn’t do it after being accused lol so I’m with you on that one lol
That's called promissory estoppel and the plaintiff needs to prove that reasonable reliance on that promise was detrimental to her. If the plaintiff went into debt and spent $3000 on replacement earrings because she relied on the defendant's promise, there's a case to be made. If the defendant promised $1M and the plaintiff went into debt on a shopping spree, there would be no case since that kind of promise would hardly be deemed reasonable.
Yes she has when it was a loan. Theft is different. When you have a loan and both parties agree up front. You then have a contract. The husband agreed to pay but never agreed that either of them stole something.
I believe the plaintiff too. The wife on the defendant side has all the excuses and reasons for why the plaintiff lost them or whatever. Sounds like the real friendship was with the husband.
Facts, the real friendship is only with the husband!!! Long time co-workers often become like family over the years, I genuinely believe that but the friendship with his Wife was fake, husband say they still cool and speak at work ect but his sticky hands wife talking about the FRIENDSHIP IS OVER!!!😤😡🙄😂😂😂😂
If you allow someone to live in your home and your items come up missing, who else but them? I believe the plaintiff, the defendant knew exactly where the jewelry was. The husband just wants to keep the peace. I hope he is able to still keep his friendship with the plaintiff.
The fact that the wife showed up to court looking dusty and busted tells me she stole them earrings. She is jealous of that lady and the friendship she has with her husband
Sounds like defendant stole it and is blaming her son and trying to twist it around to blame the plaintiff. The plaintiff sounds honest and sincere to me that she never accused the defendant's son.
The husband wants peace and the drama to stop. Their boss is involved for heaven-sake. They are arguing every day about this. Just pay the girl and let it be. Thats how he sees it.
In other cases JM has made her judgment based on admittance of an agreement but this one is somehow different? Highly disappointed. Poor lady. Hope karma bites the defendant in the rear.
Admittance of agreement on a loan or buying something is different; there's a clearly defined relationship between the parties in those instances. Here it's not so much. At the end of the day, the plaintiff doesn't know who took the earrings. There were two theories and neither was provable by the preponderance of the evidence. If the defendant [or their son] had taken them and pawned them, then the plaintiff would have had proof of the theft. There's just no proof. I think the defendant offered to pay for part of the earrings because the plaintiff had done them a favor, they felt bad, and wanted to preserve the relationship. The sad thing is that the relationship is likely beyond repair.
@@langstonwalker1618Plaintiff gave all kind of credible evidence! They were the ONLY ONES in her home, she had the Wife go to her room to get her a bracelet from her jewelry bag when she was out of town so the defendant is the only one who knew exactly where the jewelry was located. Son was probably in on it too because why come home being disrespectful and arguing with the plaintiff if you’re sooo innocent!🤔😬
I had to pause the video the moment she said that and come to the comment section. That is a ridiculous thing to be doing, and it makes perfect sense why she'd have money issues.
The female defendant stole those earrings and gave the earring to the son to sell or pawn. If I were the Platiff, I would check the neighborhood pawn shops. This case deserve a follow-up 😊.
You're so right. Half the time he doesn't ask for proof. He just goes off of who he believes, which is part of his job to listen to testimony but he's wild sometimes.
@@drlove8049 Right ‼️ It used to be funny. Now it's just played out. I was just catching up on episodes and he called someone an addict and told them off before they could say 2 words. I understand he likes to educate the audience on his show but he's just out of control. Also, not everybody wants to rant about their recovery. It doesn't always mean someone's using it, they might just be embarrassed. I'm all for it when he calls someone out when it's necessary. His new show is just hard to watch. Smh.
If i knew i didn’t take jewelry i sure as hell wouldn’t be offering up to “replace” them. Look for them sure, but that’s as good as admitting you took them in my book.
Imagine not having your own home, and still thinking it’s fine to change your furniture every year, and THEN actually stand in court giggling about it, because you’re too dense to know any better. 🤦🏽♀️ I’m thinking she may be renting furniture from one of those places like Rent-a-Center. Either way, it’s stupid, and I was second-handedly embarrassed FOR her.
If you have a roommate, or if you allow someone to live with you, make sure you valuable are locked up and you have a functional lock on the room where your valuable are located.
If my earrings were there the whole time and CONCEALED in a closet drawer, I believe the everybody that moved in is responsible for my property missing, even the son!
My best friend and I have been friends since kindergarten. We're 41 now. 36 years!!!! I'm not offering to pay for her stolen $3000 earrings if I didn't steal them. This lady is a bold faced liar!!! Smh...
I believe in avoiding problems at ALL TIMES. Get your own phone. Don't lend money. Don't borrow money. EVERYBODY should have their own house. These are my basic rules of life and living.
She took them damn earrings, but I have to disagree with the judge on the ruling, by them giving her the furniture is a form of admittance, contract or not, she should have won.
You got your car repossessed, you don’t have your own place, and apparently have financial issues BUT you can afford new furniture every year? Something’s not adding up sis
In the 90's I moved in with my friend at her parent's house (rented spare bedroom) and later found out she was going into my room while I was at work and stealing my stuff. Only lived with them for 2 months. Listen to this...she had the nerve to wear my stolen watch months later. I saw it on her at a club that we both ended up at and realized it was her stealing my stuff. She did it because that's who she is ...a thief...she didn't do it because she's poor..she lives in a nice ranch house with plenty of land. She did it because she could. I hate thieves with every fiber of my being!
Who offers to pay for something they have no involvement in the disappearance of? And why are you buying new furniture each year if you can't afford to keep a car from being repossessed?
The defendants did do it, but the plaintiff just didn't have enough evidence for the judge to make them pay. I can tell it broke the plaintiff's heart her earrings were gone. Lesson is: Be careful who you be friends. People can know you for years and still betray you.
Am I the only one who is baffled that the defendant had her car repossessed yet she changes her furniture every year? These are the same kind of people who can’t figure out why they’re broke 🤷🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
A contract is a promise typically proved by having it in writing or on record. A promise isnt a contract because no one really writes down or records what someone promises.
Energy don’t lie, & the defendant has a guilty conscience which is why she agreed to pay for her wrongdoings which is also why she lied & told her son that she “thinks” she stole them knowing that was going to send her over grown unstable son into a frenzy, hoping it would get out of hand & intimidate her. But karma will have the last laugh 💕🧿
I had roommates who stole my cash, and it was obvious that it was them but I lost the case because I had no proof of the cash existing. It was a horrible situation. I couldn't kick them out without 30 days notice so they lived in my home and did nasty things to torture me on a daily basis. From that day forward (back in 2014) - never again! I live by myself. I had a relationship with John from 2015-2019. He lived at his house and I lived at mine, and even going inside each other's houses was extremely rare. He built a pool hall in his backyard and we hung out there. ❤RIP 12/12/19❤
@deanwinchestersgirl8767 that's awesome!.....it was some serious cash in my case - $1500.....and sadly, not the only time someone stole from me, with no retribution 😡
@@ideletemycomments yep.....I had one in my vehicle when I traveled in the 1990s. It was bolted in under a seat that had to be removed.....but when you live by yourself, and no one is allowed into my apartment, it's not necessary..... it's just sad, because if I trusted someone enough to live in my home.....now I trust no one - no family members, no friends, no one. The politics of this country proves my point. 70 million people voted for him, and they are still supporting him! How can anyone trust a convicted rapist? (Because they are all ones themselves, but they didn't get caught.....) Millions of these people.... like the convicted pedophiles - for every one on the registry, there are ten more who haven't gotten caught.....Trust no one.
Three thousand for those? I’m skeptical. And why would the woman who lives with you steal those earrings when she could never ever wear them in your presence. Add to the mix the supervisor pressured the husband to pay? Abuse of power smh
They usually talk about a preponderance of the evidence… I don't know, there was a combination of them being in financial need, them being in her home, and the defendant knowing exactly where her jewelry was.
IMO, JM simply didn’t want to rule for the D. She put words in her mouth, then when the P pointed out that she had only spoken with the D and not her son, she didn’t even bother to cross examine that part of testimony.
@@shaydaslays its a job in there for a check I don't care about people like that nor am I dependent on them… that's why y'all be in do much mess at eork
@@dance4life1208I agree with you 💯 I clock in, do my job which includes interacting with my colleagues, clock out and go home. No need to know me or see me outside of work until I clock back in 👍🏼
Even though the plaintiff did not have sufficient evidence to prove her claim, I think it's highly probable that the mother of the son took those earrings The missing piece here is that we don't know how many people actually were in her house during the time that the earrings came up missing. The plaintiff mentioned that she had to spend time at her deceased grandmother's funeral so it's very possible that some friends of the defendant or the defendant's son stole the earrings. A 17 year relationship gone down the drain and this is very very sad.
Right from the start it was obvious the plaintiff would lose because being away from the home meant she had no way of proving who and when the earrings were stolen. That said, someone in the defendants' family stole the earrings. The husband tried to be honorable but his no-good mean wife wanted the drama.
A picture is worth a thousand words & the picturesque look on the defendant's face from the minute she stood behind the podium was screaming "I'm AS GUILTY AS THE DAY IS LONG."
A thief is a thief.yes friends will steal from friends but they are not friends. Thieves. I have had so called friends steal from me. I am no longer friends. $3,000 00 earrings should be on your Why would the defendant agree to pay for earrings she or he son didn't take. Why did the defendant tell about buying new furniture every year. This cas is ridiculous. This
She stole them earrings and she knows it and so does her husband. I had what I thought was a good friend, who went into the place that I kept 3 rings that were very important to me, and she stole them. Even her daughters said she took them. But she denied it. The lady who was kind enough to let these thieves live with her is well rid of them, and I wouldn’t even speak to the husband at work because he knows his wife stole the earrings which makes him a thief too. What comes around goes around.
By the look on the defendants face when the verdict was read as well as her look out in the hallway I think she took it or knows who did. She was hoping the judge awarded the plaintiff the money for the earring to finally end this. When it didn’t happen you can see in her face she felt something. Not sure what it was either she felt bad or just like I just lost a friend but by not being excited or vocal about being accused and winning kinda shows maybe she feels guilty about something and hope it would end. Maybe if they had to pay it would be a way of ending the situation without having to admit she took it. I think knowing your friend took it might be worst than being told you have to pay.
Honestly, people who say oh I have this and that and it cost this etc. unless you can find someone who values jewlery or other items like you do and will pay your asking price. Pawn shops and even jewlery places aren't gonna give you even close to the price you paid. One of them took the earrings and thought because she was traveling and is forgetful, she would chalk it up to oh I ost them. It's really sad after how long they've veen friends.
Also what kind of hostile workplace is going on here? Why did the Plaintiff bring a supervisor from the place they all work at to a court case involving another employee. There's something off with that.
I think the defendant told her son where to look and he took them. The plaintiff was friends with the defendants husband first and i think there may be a little jealousy there based off of 1:49 when she said "she was like my sister in law" and the defendant rolled her eyes.
If I could afford or bought $3,000.00 earrings, they would be the only earrings I would own. I would wear them everyday. I think the defendant took the earrings.
Getting new furniture every year is why they have to live with someone else now lol! And if they've been friends all these years, why would she wait this long to steal from her
The defendant took the earrings and probably sold them. I don't understand why the defendant and her husband would agree to pay for the earrings. That doesn't make sense , unless they sold them. Now it is possible the son took them, especially if he knew where the PLANTIF kept her jewelry. Lock your room when you leave. The defendant looks so guilty. Maybe her husband took them.
I really hope she finds her earrings and the friends didn't steal them.. Sad to see friendships over a decade to broken 💔 . If she does find them I cant imagine that they would be able to mend the relationship after taking them to court under the assumption that they stole her earrings in the 1st place ..
The plaintiff should’ve had substantial proof. The defendant makes a good point that the plaintiff loses stuff all the time. Unfortunately the friendship is over. Maybe she should’ve put her valuables in a safe.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
I would never agree to pay for something I didn't have a hand in doing.
He didn’t care. To him it was “how much money would you spend to save a friendship.” But forreal, I think they were all thinking “no one knows if it was the son, but there’s a pretty good chance…”
I have before.😢
@alisha4635 Can you give details please? That is, If you're comfortable talking about it.
@Bishop545454 While at work, someone wanted to show me pictures of a wedding. I didn't know that it wasn't her ipad, and she dropped it on the floor and wanted to just put it back. I felt bad and paid for a new one...
@alisha4635 That was nice of you but you weren't under any obligation to do so.
Buying new furniture every year is not the flex you think it is. It’s a waste of money.
that's why she needed the earrings, to pay for the stuff
It's not "buying" furniture when you gotta return it back to rent-a-center after the lease is over 😁
It's just like people being on welfare and buying expensive items or fancy rims for their clunker to feel like their living big.
Changing out furniture every year has to be the dumbest shyt I’ve heard in a long time. 😂😂
Total waste
U change furniture every year but u stay with someone? Make it make sense and your car was repossessed!!
Ghetto-broke-fabulous 💅🏼🥴
I agree. I am a single woman living alone. This is a grown woman with a grown husband living with another family. The money you spending on furniture should be for deposit on an apartment.
They should save to buy a house.
Who says the furniture was not pd for illegally. My sister’s identity was stolen and that b$tch went on a shopping spree!
Idiots
I'll say this, IF i did not take anything, i would NOT offer to pay for anything! PERIOD! That very response to take accountability for something you claim you had no parts of seems EXTREMELY suspicious!
Not really. They needed a place to stay so the offer isn't farfetched
If I felt really bad about what happened then I might offer to give them a little bit of money. That doesn't mean that I'm guilty.
No I totally understand and I agree with you but also, she could have been a loving friend that wanted to make sure her friend was compensated for a huge loss but I also wouldn’t do it after being accused lol so I’m with you on that one lol
I absolutely agree I would say absolutely not I did not do it therefore I’m not responsible sorry
i think the son should have been investigated
Instead of changing furniture every year get your own place !!!
That was a lie. If it were true, they would have their own place.
That part!
And her car got repossessed but she's buying new furniture each year??
@@lukerinderknecht2982 Right. Her and the husband laughed; proud of such a poor investment and waste of money.
Maybe rich lady should invest in some insurance too. For her stuff that she has all this money to buy
Body language and actions speaks volumes. That lady took those earrings
💯
Nasty disposition before the case even starts 🎯
She did!
😂😂😂😂😂
I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one that thinks she took them!
I’ve seen Judge Milan rule in favor on a “promise “ to pay.
She contradicts her own judgements and statements often SMH
She has said that if 2 sides agree then it is a contract.
That's called promissory estoppel and the plaintiff needs to prove that reasonable reliance on that promise was detrimental to her. If the plaintiff went into debt and spent $3000 on replacement earrings because she relied on the defendant's promise, there's a case to be made. If the defendant promised $1M and the plaintiff went into debt on a shopping spree, there would be no case since that kind of promise would hardly be deemed reasonable.
But not for a stolen item
Yes she has when it was a loan. Theft is different. When you have a loan and both parties agree up front. You then have a contract. The husband agreed to pay but never agreed that either of them stole something.
The defendant's demeanor and body language tell me she took the earrings or knows who did.
Yessssss!!! I think the same thing!!
But how could she ever wear them?? Her friend would see them and so would all their friends… it’s like driving a stolen car like, people will SEE you
@@sweet2sunshine wear them? Not hardly. Those earrings have been sold or pawned.
@@sweet2sunshineI think she stole them and sold them.
@@sweet2sunshine Her car was being repossessed. Maybe she needed the 3,000$ (earrings worth) for a car note.
And yes I do believe that the defendant stole those earrings, absolutely she did!
Agree... she looked very guilty when in the hallway... she was gazing off like she was shocked she actually got away with it.
I agree... But I think it was the defendant's idea and she had her son do it 💯
@@destineemq571 What does looking guilty mean?
@@jennross6466 looking guilty means looking culpable of or responsible for a specified wrongdoing
plus 50% offered to defendant is fishy
Changes her furniture but her car gets repossessed ? She strays off topic. Look over here, not at the missing earrings.
And laughing like it’s cute
Julius her husband did it, he looked away at key statement moments...
B O D Y
L A N G U A G E
Noone agrees to pay for something they didn't steal. Both sides say there WAS a verbal agreement of $1500, so why isn't it enforceable?
Because the plaintiff wouldn't accept it.
I would’ve took him Judge Mathis cause he would’ve said the same thing
What happened to “if not you then who?” Lmaoooo of course she stole them
The defendants laughing about changing furniture once a year. Meanwhile the audience is looking like “You’re both a couple of nuts”😂
I believe the plaintiff too. The wife on the defendant side has all the excuses and reasons for why the plaintiff lost them or whatever. Sounds like the real friendship was with the husband.
Facts, the real friendship is only with the husband!!! Long time co-workers often become like family over the years, I genuinely believe that but the friendship with his Wife was fake, husband say they still cool and speak at work ect but his sticky hands wife talking about the FRIENDSHIP IS OVER!!!😤😡🙄😂😂😂😂
Car repo'd but you change furniture every year is crazy
If you allow someone to live in your home and your items come up missing, who else but them? I believe the plaintiff, the defendant knew exactly where the jewelry was. The husband just wants to keep the peace. I hope he is able to still keep his friendship with the plaintiff.
I agree with everything you said up until the last sentence. If I were the plaintiff, I wouldn't have anything to do with any of them.
@@rockobill7637this!! Same here. I'd run! No way his wife stole something and sold it without his knowledge
Guests of the defendant for one. Assuming they did it is ridiculous. She could’ve also lost her stuff
@@elvickRULES and if you hear hooves it's not horses, but zebras, right?
Keep the friendship for what? I'd be done with EVERYBODY. It's not possible to be friends after such betrayal.
The fact that the wife showed up to court looking dusty and busted tells me she stole them earrings. She is jealous of that lady and the friendship she has with her husband
💯
ON POINT 💯💯💯
Hunh. How get jealousy out of that.
hahaha 😂
Sounds like defendant stole it and is blaming her son and trying to twist it around to blame the plaintiff. The plaintiff sounds honest and sincere to me that she never accused the defendant's son.
Dude, looks like Charles Barkley
@@34stzooI agree, Twinning!😁
Living with someone, car repossessed. . . . . math ain't mathin'.
Even if she paid. If she thinks she’s a thief they won’t be friends again. That would be ridiculous.
She took those earrings. You can tell by that face at the end.
Don't let people stay with you in your home. 💯
If the husband offered to pay, he probably knows or suspects that his wife stole the earrings.. especially if he is still friends with the plaintiff
Maybe the husband was trying to protect the son.
Trying to protect his wife
@@streetsofgold4310
The husband wants peace and the drama to stop. Their boss is involved for heaven-sake. They are arguing every day about this. Just pay the girl and let it be. Thats how he sees it.
Idk why JM thinks people would keep proof of purchase from EIGHTEEN YEARS AGO.
Sadly its still understandable why courts require that. Can't claim oh yea this that and xyz your honor I have no proof.
A receipt or a recent appraisal would’ve worked
Actually, if it’s expensive jewelry, you keep receipts for insurance purposes.
In other cases JM has made her judgment based on admittance of an agreement but this one is somehow different? Highly disappointed. Poor lady. Hope karma bites the defendant in the rear.
Admittance of agreement on a loan or buying something is different; there's a clearly defined relationship between the parties in those instances. Here it's not so much. At the end of the day, the plaintiff doesn't know who took the earrings. There were two theories and neither was provable by the preponderance of the evidence.
If the defendant [or their son] had taken them and pawned them, then the plaintiff would have had proof of the theft. There's just no proof.
I think the defendant offered to pay for part of the earrings because the plaintiff had done them a favor, they felt bad, and wanted to preserve the relationship.
The sad thing is that the relationship is likely beyond repair.
@@langstonwalker1618 you’re so right . Sad case though 😭
@@langstonwalker1618Plaintiff gave all kind of credible evidence! They were the ONLY ONES in her home, she had the Wife go to her room to get her a bracelet from her jewelry bag when she was out of town so the defendant is the only one who knew exactly where the jewelry was located. Son was probably in on it too because why come home being disrespectful and arguing with the plaintiff if you’re sooo innocent!🤔😬
Change furniture every January and laughing and proud of it but her car repo’d lol
And she was homeless smh
Sounds like renting furniture and being ghetto fabulous
I had to pause the video the moment she said that and come to the comment section. That is a ridiculous thing to be doing, and it makes perfect sense why she'd have money issues.
She changes her furniture every year, yet her car gets repossessed?
STUPID
STUPID
STUPID
Make it make sense lol
You can buy cheap furniture sets for less than $1000 versus making $350 per month.
The female defendant stole those earrings and gave the earring to the son to sell or pawn. If I were the Platiff, I would check the neighborhood pawn shops. This case deserve a follow-up 😊.
Judge Mathis would have given the plaintiff the $2,400 without proof of the cost of the earrings.
You're so right. Half the time he doesn't ask for proof. He just goes off of who he believes, which is part of his job to listen to testimony but he's wild sometimes.
And woulda asked the defendant was she a crackhead 😂😂😂which got old🥺
Yah definitely don’t watch judge Mathis then smh… it’s mandatory to have proof of cost smh
@@drlove8049 Right ‼️ It used to be funny. Now it's just played out. I was just catching up on episodes and he called someone an addict and told them off before they could say 2 words. I understand he likes to educate the audience on his show but he's just out of control. Also, not everybody wants to rant about their recovery. It doesn't always mean someone's using it, they might just be embarrassed. I'm all for it when he calls someone out when it's necessary. His new show is just hard to watch. Smh.
Mathis is unwatchable!
legend has it that the plaintiff found her earrings two years later next to the new set of lost keys🤷🏽♀️🤣
If i knew i didn’t take jewelry i sure as hell wouldn’t be offering up to “replace” them. Look for them sure, but that’s as good as admitting you took them in my book.
Exactly ! It sounds like an admission of guilt
Exactly!!!!!
Unless she knew her son had something to do with it, and was trying to protect her son.
Imagine not having your own home, and still thinking it’s fine to change your furniture every year, and THEN actually stand in court giggling about it, because you’re too dense to know any better. 🤦🏽♀️ I’m thinking she may be renting furniture from one of those places like Rent-a-Center. Either way, it’s stupid, and I was second-handedly embarrassed FOR her.
Same idea as leasing a car. Always have new furniture. Don't have to pay it all at once.
If you have a roommate, or if you allow someone to live with you, make sure you valuable are locked up and you have a functional lock on the room where your valuable are located.
I would no longer be her friend. I just couldn't do it.
Her and the husband guilty. My cousin stole from my neighbor we had him on camera he still say he didn’t do it but paid for it a week later. 😂😂
Lol
😮😮😮😮 on camera but still deny!
She took those earrings.
@kats5866 Yep. And probably got 1500 for them from a pawn shop.
"Did I just bully you?"...."yes".... that was funny...lol.
They try to rinag on the deal. I'm dead I guess they're not allowed to say renege? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
If my earrings were there the whole time and CONCEALED in a closet drawer, I believe the everybody that moved in is responsible for my property missing, even the son!
My best friend and I have been friends since kindergarten. We're 41 now. 36 years!!!! I'm not offering to pay for her stolen $3000 earrings if I didn't steal them. This lady is a bold faced liar!!! Smh...
I believe in avoiding problems at ALL TIMES. Get your own phone. Don't lend money. Don't borrow money. EVERYBODY should have their own house. These are my basic rules of life and living.
If you have a mortgage or loan, you're borrowing money.
I second this
@@sdays59 I agree!
I had a roomate that took jewelry that I can never replace! And I can never get over it.😭 I believe she took them.
She took them damn earrings, but I have to disagree with the judge on the ruling, by them giving her the furniture is a form of admittance, contract or not, she should have won.
You got your car repossessed, you don’t have your own place, and apparently have financial issues BUT you can afford new furniture every year? Something’s not adding up sis
You can see she a liar and dumb as hell
In the 90's I moved in with my friend at her parent's house (rented spare bedroom) and later found out she was going into my room while I was at work and stealing my stuff. Only lived with them for 2 months. Listen to this...she had the nerve to wear my stolen watch months later. I saw it on her at a club that we both ended up at and realized it was her stealing my stuff. She did it because that's who she is ...a thief...she didn't do it because she's poor..she lives in a nice ranch house with plenty of land. She did it because she could. I hate thieves with every fiber of my being!
Who offers to pay for something they have no involvement in the disappearance of? And why are you buying new furniture each year if you can't afford to keep a car from being repossessed?
The "education" example was NOT applicable here.
Milian gets in my nerves sometimes 🙄
She get on my nerves too at times, but I keep watching
Innocent people don't offer to replace stolen goods
She got her car repossessed but changing furniture every year 🤯
The defendants did do it, but the plaintiff just didn't have enough evidence for the judge to make them pay. I can tell it broke the plaintiff's heart her earrings were gone. Lesson is: Be careful who you be friends. People can know you for years and still betray you.
Facts!!!!💯🎯🎯🎯🎯👏🏾👏🏾
Am I the only one who is baffled that the defendant had her car repossessed yet she changes her furniture every year? These are the same kind of people who can’t figure out why they’re broke 🤷🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
The son did it, maybe that's why he was so angry and defensive
If they were in financial need how did the defendant buy new furniture every year. Well I guess maybe that’s why they were in financial need
Store credit
Tax season
So a contract is a promise, but a promise isn’t a contract. Like a square is a rectangle, but a rectangle is not a square lol 🤯
A square isn't a rectangle. It's a square. Bad analogy
@@TopherGrant A square is a rectangle. Bad education smh 🤦♂️
A contract is a promise typically proved by having it in writing or on record. A promise isnt a contract because no one really writes down or records what someone promises.
@@mrjay1268 idk maybe I’m overthinking
@@mrjay1268 or maybe it’s only applicable in a quid pro quo scenario
Energy don’t lie, & the defendant has a guilty conscience which is why she agreed to pay for her wrongdoings which is also why she lied & told her son that she “thinks” she stole them knowing that was going to send her over grown unstable son into a frenzy, hoping it would get out of hand & intimidate her. But karma will have the last laugh 💕🧿
Facts!!!!
I had roommates who stole my cash, and it was obvious that it was them but I lost the case because I had no proof of the cash existing. It was a horrible situation. I couldn't kick them out without 30 days notice so they lived in my home and did nasty things to torture me on a daily basis. From that day forward (back in 2014) - never again! I live by myself. I had a relationship with John from 2015-2019. He lived at his house and I lived at mine, and even going inside each other's houses was extremely rare. He built a pool hall in his backyard and we hung out there. ❤RIP 12/12/19❤
@deanwinchestersgirl8767 that's awesome!.....it was some serious cash in my case - $1500.....and sadly, not the only time someone stole from me, with no retribution 😡
@deanwinchestersgirl8767 you think this threat will work on my kids 😂😂😂
Idk why you guys don't store valuables in a secure area like those lockboxes you can buy at Walmart . A good one cost about 50 bucks.
@@ideletemycomments back when I couldn't afford to live on my own, even 50 bucks wasn't easy to come by
@@ideletemycomments yep.....I had one in my vehicle when I traveled in the 1990s. It was bolted in under a seat that had to be removed.....but when you live by yourself, and no one is allowed into my apartment, it's not necessary..... it's just sad, because if I trusted someone enough to live in my home.....now I trust no one - no family members, no friends, no one. The politics of this country proves my point. 70 million people voted for him, and they are still supporting him! How can anyone trust a convicted rapist? (Because they are all ones themselves, but they didn't get caught.....) Millions of these people.... like the convicted pedophiles - for every one on the registry, there are ten more who haven't gotten caught.....Trust no one.
The Judge is dead wrong in ruling they said the would pay and the bedroom was a down payment for the earing. That was wrong all around
Try taking a shot every time you hear "friends for 17 years" in this case. You'll be blackout drunk
Three thousand for those? I’m skeptical. And why would the woman who lives with you steal those earrings when she could never ever wear them in your presence. Add to the mix the supervisor pressured the husband to pay? Abuse of power smh
Why is all these grown people living together? 3 able bodied people should be able to pay rent. Change furniture and you homeless? Make it make sense!
Change furniture every year but you and your family living with some one else
The "helping me look for it" lets me know ol girl stole it 5:57
They usually talk about a preponderance of the evidence… I don't know, there was a combination of them being in financial need, them being in her home, and the defendant knowing exactly where her jewelry was.
IMO, JM simply didn’t want to rule for the D. She put words in her mouth, then when the P pointed out that she had only spoken with the D and not her son, she didn’t even bother to cross examine that part of testimony.
Whenever somebody used the excuse “I have my own XXXX” as to why they didn’t steal something you can almost guarantee they did steal it.
Why get that close to people you work with
Umm working hrs a day, several days a week with a person. What do you act like they don't exist or..?
@@shaydaslays its a job in there for a check I don't care about people like that nor am I dependent on them… that's why y'all be in do much mess at eork
@@dance4life1208I agree with you 💯 I clock in, do my job which includes interacting with my colleagues, clock out and go home. No need to know me or see me outside of work until I clock back in 👍🏼
I do. I do. I do. Great explanation
Plaintiff/Defendant : I need time off for court
Supervisor : I don’t believe you. I’m coming to court to check for myself .
😂😂😂😂
She stole them and then tried to put the blame on her own son, to take the heat off herself.
Karma always comes
Even though the plaintiff did not have sufficient evidence to prove her claim, I think it's highly probable that the mother of the son took those earrings
The missing piece here is that we don't know how many people actually were in her house during the time that the earrings came up missing.
The plaintiff mentioned that she had to spend time at her deceased grandmother's funeral so it's very possible that some friends of the defendant or the defendant's son stole the earrings.
A 17 year relationship gone down the drain and this is very very sad.
Right from the start it was obvious the plaintiff would lose because being away from the home meant she had no way of proving who and when the earrings were stolen. That said, someone in the defendants' family stole the earrings. The husband tried to be honorable but his no-good mean wife wanted the drama.
She wanted that drama cuz she is jealous of that relationship of her husband and the plaintiff
@@S_Walk1 Good point.
A picture is worth a thousand words & the picturesque look on the defendant's face from the minute she stood behind the podium was screaming "I'm AS GUILTY AS THE DAY IS LONG."
The supervisor is definitely a Liberian 😭💀
Defendant knew what happened to the earrings they're lying
Seriously, that "I don't know" after Dough asked where the earrings made it obvious she was lying
A thief is a thief.yes friends will steal from friends but they are not friends. Thieves.
I have had so called friends steal from me. I am no longer friends.
$3,000
00 earrings should be on your
Why would the defendant agree to pay for earrings she or he son didn't take.
Why did the defendant tell about buying new furniture every year. This cas is ridiculous.
This
Don’t surround yourself with bums‼️
She stole them earrings and she knows it and so does her husband.
I had what I thought was a good friend, who went into the place that I kept 3 rings that were very important to me, and she stole them.
Even her daughters said she took them. But she denied it.
The lady who was kind enough to let these thieves live with her is well rid of them, and I wouldn’t even speak to the husband at work because he knows his wife stole the earrings which makes him a thief too.
What comes around goes around.
That husband would be paying me every payday, because I would have taken the 1500 then sued
Defendant changes her furniture every year because I can imagine the condition of it by that time.
She’s probably buying trash pieces of furniture that’s why she’s buying it every year
By the look on the defendants face when the verdict was read as well as her look out in the hallway I think she took it or knows who did. She was hoping the judge awarded the plaintiff the money for the earring to finally end this. When it didn’t happen you can see in her face she felt something. Not sure what it was either she felt bad or just like I just lost a friend but by not being excited or vocal about being accused and winning kinda shows maybe she feels guilty about something and hope it would end. Maybe if they had to pay it would be a way of ending the situation without having to admit she took it. I think knowing your friend took it might be worst than being told you have to pay.
Changing furniture every year but getting your car repossessed is insane money management
She dumb
Them agreeing to pay is not a contract? 🤣🤣🤣
How is an agreement to pay someone for something not a verbal contract?? I don’t get it
both parties have to give up something in return OR there has to be detrimental reliance
Honestly, people who say oh I have this and that and it cost this etc. unless you can find someone who values jewlery or other items like you do and will pay your asking price. Pawn shops and even jewlery places aren't gonna give you even close to the price you paid. One of them took the earrings and thought because she was traveling and is forgetful, she would chalk it up to oh I ost them. It's really sad after how long they've veen friends.
The face of the defendant husband looks constantly surprised😂
Changing furniture every year…sounds like a poor person’s problems.
Wow the defendant didn't have to go all out just because she's going to be on TV. 🤣
Also what kind of hostile workplace is going on here? Why did the Plaintiff bring a supervisor from the place they all work at to a court case involving another employee. There's something off with that.
Circumstantial evidence point towards her,and she agrees to pay half,why agree to pay for something you didn't stole
I think the defendant told her son where to look and he took them. The plaintiff was friends with the defendants husband first and i think there may be a little jealousy there based off of 1:49 when she said "she was like my sister in law" and the defendant rolled her eyes.
If I could afford or bought $3,000.00 earrings, they would be the only earrings I would own. I would wear them everyday.
I think the defendant took the earrings.
She can’t keep a place to stay because she keeps buying furniture! Tf?😂😂
It's too bad she was keeping her valuables in a "draw" instead of a secure location 😂
You caught that too 😭
🤭😆😆
Finally the comment that would have prevented this ugly mess and saved the 20 year friendship. I see jewelry safes online for $80
🤣😂😂😂
Drawer.
Getting new furniture every year is why they have to live with someone else now lol!
And if they've been friends all these years, why would she wait this long to steal from her
The defendant took the earrings and probably sold them.
I don't understand why the defendant and her husband would agree to pay for the earrings. That doesn't make sense , unless they sold them.
Now it is possible the son took them, especially if he knew where the PLANTIF kept her jewelry.
Lock your room when you leave.
The defendant looks so guilty.
Maybe her husband took them.
I wouldn’t dare pay $3k for some earrings. I’ve had a problem with $50! lol 😂
Shes a thief!
Judge missed the mark. Her earrings weren’t thrown around. Only the defendant knew way deep in her closet? N that lady broke?
I really hope she finds her earrings and the friends didn't steal them.. Sad to see friendships over a decade to broken 💔 . If she does find them I cant imagine that they would be able to mend the relationship after taking them to court under the assumption that they stole her earrings in the 1st place ..
It's so hilarious to me how they prefer their last name not be called, but their faces are on national television😄😃😀! LOL
No last name does make it harder to search them up though.
The plaintiff should’ve had substantial proof. The defendant makes a good point that the plaintiff loses stuff all the time. Unfortunately the friendship is over. Maybe she should’ve put her valuables in a safe.
Wish she had a secret surveillance camera in her room! 🎥