The Embraer NEW C-390 Will Change The Aviation Industry and Destroy C-130J! Here's Why

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 июл 2024
  • The Embraer NEW C-390 Will Change The Aviation Industry and Destroy C-130J! Here's Why
    ===
    #fligavia #boeing #airbus #embraer #aviations
    ===
    Intro: 00:00 - 00:42
    C390’s journey: 00:42 - 02:43
    C390’s design: 02:43 - 05:54
    Not the first challenger: 05:54 - 08:01
    Comparison: 08:01 - 11:08
    What the future holds: 11:08 - 13:26
    ===
    The Embraer NEW C-390 Will Change The Aviation Industry and Destroy C-130J! Here's Why
    The C1 30 J Super Hercules, renowned for its unparalleled versatility and reliability, has been a cornerstone of military transport for decades, offering enhanced performance with state-of-the-art technology, faster climb and cruise speeds, and the ability to operate in diverse and austere environments worldwide. But, as tempting as it sounds, in this video, we are not going to talk about it but another aircraft that is going to dethrone it, the Embraer C3 90. Find out in this episode of Flig Avia: why C3 90 is going to change the industry? How it will destroy C 1 30 J?
    But before we start, to help us improve our channel, please hit the like button and subscribe if you haven’t yet, so that we can build the channel together. Thank you so much. Now, let’s dive in!
    The Embraer NEW C-390 Will Change The Aviation Industry and Destroy C-130J! Here's Why
    First up, To grasp the significance of the C3 nineties popularity, it's essential to revisit Embraer's history with military jets. Embraer, a prominent Brazilian company known for manufacturing a variety of aircraft, pivoted in 19 69 to concentrate on military aircraft for the Brazilian Air Force. In April 2007, Embraer announced its intention to develop a midsize twinjet military aircraft, with the goal of replacing aging cargo planes with a modern, technologically advanced alternative. The inspiration for this new aircraft was drawn heavily from their Embraer 1 90. Originally designated as the C 3 90, the aircraft was subsequently renamed to KC 3 90 to reflect its capability to perform air-to-air refueling operations for other planes.
    The Embraer NEW C-390 Will Change The Aviation Industry and Destroy C-130J! Here's Why
    By May 2008, the Brazilian government had invested over 460 million dollars in its development. Come April 2009, Embraer secured a 1.5 billion dollar contract to construct two prototypes, initiating production with the backing of the Brazilian Air Force. Following rigorous testing of the prototypes, the aircraft, dubbed the C390 Millennium, was unveiled in 20 19. It was strategically designed to contend with, and potentially supplant, Lockheed Martin's C1 30 Super Hercules cargo jets-a significant feat considering the C1 thirties longstanding prominence in the aviation market. Embraer's jet had to prove its mettle as a viable primary option for military cargo transportation, and with the C3 90 Millennium, Embraer has done just that.

Комментарии • 602

  • @lotus1238
    @lotus1238 22 дня назад +147

    Embraer is breaking paradigms with its aircraft. Before, no one, other than Americans and Europeans, entered the very closed market of the aeronautical industry. The KC-390 was designed in the 21st century and was born under the patronage of modernity. The brave C-130 Hercules has become a legendary and consolidated machine, but it falls short of what is required of an average freighter today. Embraer's biggest challenge in offering the KC-390s to the world will be overcoming the very powerful American lobby in the defense industry.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  21 день назад +11

      yeah thanks for your sharing

    • @frederickdouglass7140
      @frederickdouglass7140 20 дней назад +3

      😂😂😂 Airbus c400 is the best, kc390 is for poor countries

    • @lotus1238
      @lotus1238 20 дней назад +36

      @@frederickdouglass7140 Is the C-17 Globemaster III superior to the Air Bus C-400? It depends on the application. The C-400 is another category of aircraft. The time is for more rational, economical aircraft, without unnecessary excesses. The era of megalomania for flying colossi is long gone. In practice, the KC-390 does everything an A-400 does, however, with extremely lower acquisition and maintenance costs. The choice for the KC-390 is not passionate, it is rational.

    • @lotus1238
      @lotus1238 20 дней назад +19

      @@frederickdouglass7140 In fact, I must emphasize: what a comment, but devoid of arguments, yours. Stupid, I would say. Debate with solid and intelligent arguments and not with prejudices and fallacies. Your comment really is an X-ray of your intellect, of your inability to interact at a high level.

    • @eduardomeller6926
      @eduardomeller6926 19 дней назад +9

      @@frederickdouglass7140 The A400M from Airbus, you mean. The German air force did not even accept delivery at first given the bad quality product it is.

  • @vilson.batista
    @vilson.batista 21 день назад +28

    I watched a video where this Embraer is used to put out forest fires by releasing a large amount of water. Impressive versatility.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  21 день назад +2

      Yeah thanks for your feedback ✈️

  • @armyranger9346
    @armyranger9346 22 часа назад +6

    The C-130 isn't going anywhere. One of the strongest points about the C-130 is its speed. Its ability to fly slow is the very reason it's used for so many different types of missions. I've been on a C-130 that made a night landing on a dried up lake bed with the pilots using night vision goggles. If they're after speed, fly a C-141. If they're after payload, fly a C-5M Super Galaxy or a C-17 Globemaster.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  19 часов назад

      Thanks for sharing your experience. Amazing

  • @dattatrayjadhav4186
    @dattatrayjadhav4186 День назад +5

    It’s impressive how Embraer has developed the C-390 to meet modern military needs.

  • @unknown98777
    @unknown98777 День назад +4

    Embraer’s history in military aviation has clearly prepared them well for developing the C-390.

  • @newconcept8144
    @newconcept8144 21 день назад +13

    This militar aircraft has worked hard since the beginning! By the way, Embraer can configure it for civil option!
    It moved a giant helicopter disassembled from USA to Portugal, supported people in state of Brazil after rain storm moving a lot of things like foods, clothes, people, tools, etc..
    This is why it must exist!
    Thanks for all information!
    Congratulations.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  21 день назад +1

      Thanks for your support ✈️✈️✈️ have a nice day

    • @rocket870
      @rocket870 7 дней назад

      @newconcept8144 Mate, have you seen what the C-130J, G-5 Galaxy, and C-17 have all carried.
      The RNZAF C-130H is an aircraft in service for over 60-63 years.
      The RNZAF C-130H carried out missions carrying troops, refugees, supplies, weapons, food, medical supplies, vehicles, and a lot more all the way across the world from a small nation that is not even shown on most maps.
      The RNZAF C-130H flew consistently 13,554 kilometers with close to 10-19 tons of cargo. The NZDF is receiving 5 new C-130-J-30 super Hercules, and that will make us have much more reach to help other nations when in need.

  • @kevinferrin5695
    @kevinferrin5695 День назад +9

    The narration repeats itself annoyingly. It never did a thorough comparison with the C-130. It uses terms like "more effective" without giving actual data. This is bogus.

    • @marcom2248
      @marcom2248 День назад +2

      That's an ai generated text.

  • @cookieheadjekins6344
    @cookieheadjekins6344 День назад +4

    C130..rolling down the strip..airborne daddy..gonna take a trip..❤AIRBORNE!

  • @AndreDelai
    @AndreDelai 7 часов назад +2

    Both will fly together for a long time. That´s the beauty of the aviation.

  • @thomasstoewer2681
    @thomasstoewer2681 2 дня назад +7

    Apparently, they missed the reason why the C130 is still being used. Prop driven aircraft are inherently safer to operate on unimproved airfields. Less chance to damage the engines. We use C17s for heavier loads from improved fields. Why add another airframe?

    • @C0lon0
      @C0lon0 2 дня назад +3

      US will never buy an foreign freighter due to US laws, but others countries will.

  • @sk_gaming_95
    @sk_gaming_95 День назад +2

    The C-390’s performance in rigorous testing is a testament to its reliability and capability.

  • @dozen6556
    @dozen6556 6 дней назад +17

    🇧🇷♥️ E tudo isso começou com o grande brasileiro Santos Dumont o inventor do Avião 🇧🇷♥️

    • @glennoropeza3545
      @glennoropeza3545 6 дней назад +1

      The inventor of the airplane came from the United States! Two brothers-Orville & Wilbur Wright! Do your research!

    • @bernardoo3686
      @bernardoo3686 6 дней назад +8

      ​@@glennoropeza3545 catapult doesn't count. Do your research.

    • @GabrielVitor-kq6uj
      @GabrielVitor-kq6uj 6 дней назад +6

      @@glennoropeza3545 catapult launched... no reliable proofing, no public exibition.. only some old logs with some dates written on them... Dumont actually showed it publicly in Paris, while the brothers said they flwon it in said date...
      Do your research.

  • @m2hmghb
    @m2hmghb 9 часов назад +5

    The biggest problem is it's a jet which means it'll eat FOD. That's why the 130 has turboprops and hasn't been replaced thus far.

    • @johnhagemeyer8578
      @johnhagemeyer8578 6 часов назад +1

      Can it back up like a C130?
      I would like to see it land at Sila Creek, at Yakama Fireing Range DZ

    • @proberts34
      @proberts34 4 часа назад +1

      @@johnhagemeyer8578 Here's your gigantic dust and FOD cloud. Keep breathing!

  • @premchandchauhan8309
    @premchandchauhan8309 День назад +2

    The Embraer C-390 looks like a serious competitor to the C-130J. Can’t wait to see it in action!

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  19 часов назад

      thanks for comment

  • @nixer8984
    @nixer8984 2 дня назад +5

    Gotta love the ten positive comments in a row, all lgged in at almost the same time.😂

  • @MarjorieJ.Taggart
    @MarjorieJ.Taggart 5 дней назад +7

    The detailed comparison between the C-390 and C-130J in this episode was eye-opening. Embraer has done an outstanding job.

  • @ChetanRegar-zh7nt
    @ChetanRegar-zh7nt День назад +2

    The air-to-air refueling capability of the C-390 gives it a significant edge.

  • @aceyashashree
    @aceyashashree 7 дней назад +7

    Embraer’s focus on modern, technologically advanced alternatives is commendable.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  7 дней назад +2

      yep you're right

    • @Lonewolfmike
      @Lonewolfmike 6 дней назад +1

      The C-130 and AC-130 have had plenty of tech upgrades themselves over the last number of years.

    • @lucasmarques864
      @lucasmarques864 6 дней назад +1

      @@Lonewolfmike But even so, they remain outdated compared to the KC-390.

  • @proberts34
    @proberts34 4 часа назад +2

    The C-130 has been fulfilling missions for about 60 years, with many variations and many generations, and it has proven itself time and time again. Let's give the C-390 about 10 years of evaluation time and real world missions (both peacetime and wartime) to determine if it will "dethrone" the C-130. As I recall, Airbus tried to assume that role with the A-400M, starting about 10 years ago. I'm not sure that's on track for Airbus.
    I'm all for replacing old and obsolete equipment, but those replacements need to be better, not just different. The C-390 speed (max: 988 km/h, cruise: 870 km/h) is a nice improvement. Certainly better than the C-130 speed (max: 590 km/h, cruise: 540 km/h). And the additional 7 tons of cargo capacity (26,000 kg vs. 19,000kg) is always welcomed. For the C-390, I'd like to see the results of STOL testing and the ability to do a LAPES drop. I'd also be interested in how those engines perform after sucking up a cloud of dust and sand during a short landing on a semi-improved dirt or sand runway.
    Oh, and Loadmasters do more than just lower the tailgate, so I seriously doubt that the C-390 has rendered the role of Loadmaster unnecessary. That is like saying, "the pilot can turn a bolt, thereby rendering a maintenance ground crew unnecessary". Those Loadmasters and ground crews do SO much more. Interestingly, about 40 seconds after making that statement about making Loadmasters unnecessary because the pilot can lower the tailgate, you indicate that the aircraft is manned by a 3-person crew: a pilot, co-pilot, and Loadmaster. So. . .which is it?

  • @gilsantos3021
    @gilsantos3021 18 дней назад +11

    Tomara que os EUA não invente algo para arruinar o sucesso do KC 390

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  17 дней назад +2

      thanks for your comment

  • @MisakoNan
    @MisakoNan 5 дней назад +5

    Embraer stepping up their game with the C-390. This aircraft has the potential to revolutionize military transport.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  5 дней назад

      thanks for comment

    • @ReaderStuff-yy3dq
      @ReaderStuff-yy3dq 5 дней назад

      It is a box with things. Not much to revolutionize. That being said, it looks like a pretty impressive box with wings.

  • @EddyDard
    @EddyDard 5 дней назад +6

    The versatility and advanced design of the C-390 make it a formidable competitor. Exciting times ahead for aviation!

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  5 дней назад

      thanks for comment

  • @pietrodagostini9922
    @pietrodagostini9922 2 дня назад +6

    the owner of the video kicked a nest of American patriots

  • @samuelchurch9892
    @samuelchurch9892 День назад +4

    The C-130 was a stop gap in 1956 to fill the need until the C-133 and new C-141A came on line. So, almost 70 years-old and still in production with more jobs that Carter has liver pills. It's not going off line anytime soon.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  19 часов назад

      Thanks for your sharing

    • @Bellboy40
      @Bellboy40 6 часов назад

      The aviation industry seems to adhere to the same philosophy as mechanics.... It's only a temporary fix unless it works, then it's permanent. 😂

  • @jonashermelindooliveira2823
    @jonashermelindooliveira2823 21 час назад +5

    Embraer, Brasil ❤❤❤

  • @RavalKanubhai-uw3pm
    @RavalKanubhai-uw3pm 9 дней назад +5

    Embraer’s history with military jets shows in the C-390. This aircraft is built for the future.

  • @sonnymagalhaes9203
    @sonnymagalhaes9203 11 дней назад +7

    Amazing and beautiful aircraft. The best in this category. 👍

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  10 дней назад +1

      ✈️✈️✈️

  • @AKFF594
    @AKFF594 День назад +3

    Investing over $460 million in the C-390 shows how committed Brazil is to advancing its aviation industry.

    • @jb6027
      @jb6027 38 минут назад

      That's about the price of 2 airplanes. Not a big deal. More like a jobs project.

  • @WillWoods-qg5pu
    @WillWoods-qg5pu День назад +4

    What the C-130 will still do: double as a weapons platform for Harvest Hawk and Rapid Dragon. The C-130J has a range of 3300 km while the loaded C390 max range is 2100 km. The 130 will have a standoff capability to launch multiple cruise missiles at any Pacific adversary. It is a practical, cost-effective platform for the next 20 years. After that, the C-390 will be viable competitor.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  19 часов назад

      Thanks for your comment. Useful knowledge.

  • @MaryannT.Leggett
    @MaryannT.Leggett День назад

    The unveiling of the C-390 Millennium in 2019 marked a pivotal moment in military aviation. Embraer's dedication to innovation is evident in this state-of-the-art aircraft.

  • @eduardofarias5397
    @eduardofarias5397 2 дня назад +3

    Austria and the Netherlands have just signed the purchase of 9 units to be operated jointly between the two countries.

  • @LindaTancy
    @LindaTancy День назад

    Embraer's history with military jets is impressive, and the C-390 Millennium is a testament to their expertise and innovation. This aircraft is set to revolutionize military transport.

  • @davidfreeman2522
    @davidfreeman2522 4 часа назад +3

    They act like the c130 can't be air refueled.

  • @dennisswartz4937
    @dennisswartz4937 23 часа назад +6

    Ok, look, the C130 IS THE KING...PERIOD!
    C130s have been flying since 1955. Yes, at some time or another, they will be stood down and replaced by something. But before you start rah-rahing to much, put your plane in service and let's see where we are in a couple decades.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  19 часов назад

      Thanks for your comment

  • @bluebayou187
    @bluebayou187 2 дня назад +3

    We already tested a C-27 Spartan. It didn't pass the smell test...Lol!

  • @MaimiOosaki
    @MaimiOosaki День назад

    The comparison between the C-390 and the C-130J is fascinating. It's amazing how Embraer has managed to create such a versatile and powerful aircraft. The future of military aviation looks promising.

  • @Damiannhu
    @Damiannhu 7 дней назад +6

    The Embraer C-390 looks like it could be a real game-changer for military transport!

  • @AbelaPirozzi
    @AbelaPirozzi 9 дней назад +2

    The history of Embraer’s military jets is fascinating. They've come a long way!

  • @Partha_Das123
    @Partha_Das123 День назад +2

    The C-390 Millennium’s advanced technology could definitely shake up the military transport market.

  • @PirajiSolnkar
    @PirajiSolnkar День назад +1

    Looking forward to seeing how the C-390 will be integrated into various military fleets around the world.

  • @antonioaugustoribeirodossa8138
    @antonioaugustoribeirodossa8138 21 день назад +7

    This is a fantastic plane.

  • @coloradomountainman8659
    @coloradomountainman8659 2 дня назад +6

    Sounds like you read it right out of a sales manual. No place for that here on RUclips.

  • @paulofreitas2142
    @paulofreitas2142 10 дней назад +11

    Some Americans in the comments just felt the hit... Relax, you are still number one and will be for a long time. Despite all the issues and problems here, we Brazilians still have things to be proud of. A third-world country like ours, competing in technology with the most powerful nation in the world, is something we all should applaud, even you guys. A lot of the knowledge we have, we learned from you. And remember, Brazilians are your allies, not enemies.

    • @cyberbeefpv2810
      @cyberbeefpv2810 10 дней назад +1

      i agree

    • @toniastral
      @toniastral 10 дней назад +1

      🐶

    • @davidgiles9751
      @davidgiles9751 7 дней назад +4

      Hey my friend, I thought you'd be interested in my take on this. I flew C-130Es in the USAF for almost 9 years. I'm a fan of the J model, but never flew it. Having said that, I find the C-390 to be a potentially outstanding machine! You see, the basic C-130 design has realized it's full potential with the J model. Don't get me wrong, it's still an excellent design that will be flying for many years to come. However, when the USAF decides to start replacing the J model, I'm hoping that it will be a completely different design. I'm not sure when that will be, as the J models rolling off the assembly line have decades of service life ahead of them. I honestly loved flying the Herc (even the old E model), but there are other excellent designs out there that are potentially better. The C-390 is one of those. It will take time to prove itself though, as the C-130 has clearly demonstrated it's capabilities for nearly 70 years. To close, I applaud Brazil and Embraer on producing an excellent and beautiful design, and wish it success.
      Cheers

    • @PodofGold
      @PodofGold 5 дней назад

      I think everyone just wants to hear some facts and to be allowed to make a decision based on the facts, not some sales pitch and "its better and I'm not giving any facts to show it is better".
      Let the people decide based on some facts. C-130 is old but there's a reason it's still flying and has a fanbase.
      Would love to see a breakdown of turbofan vs turboprop and why one is better than the other in this situation. "faster" isn't really what people are looking for. If we wanted a C130 with turbofans, they'd have built one. There's a reason why it has turboprops. What is the reasoning for turbofan on the KC390?
      more data! more info! :)

  • @petere4540
    @petere4540 15 дней назад +5

    This aircraft is amazing, Portuguese air Force got the first one in service and you can see it shutting back and forth between Lisbon cam and Madeira

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  15 дней назад +1

      yep that's a great aircraft

  • @AuliPallasmaa
    @AuliPallasmaa 9 дней назад +2

    The C-390’s design and features are impressive. This could be a real contender.

  • @VictoriaA.Rodriguez
    @VictoriaA.Rodriguez День назад

    The Embraer C-390 Millennium is truly a game-changer! Its advanced technology and capabilities make it a strong contender to replace the legendary C-130J. Can't wait to see how it performs in various missions.

  • @chrislj2890
    @chrislj2890 2 дня назад +5

    The pilot can control the cargo bay therefore they don't need a loadmaster? I thought a loadmaster did more than just flip a switch. This seems more like a promotional video for Embraer. The first flight of the C-130 was 70 years ago, can the C-390 achieve that?

    • @C0lon0
      @C0lon0 2 дня назад +1

      Embraer built an jet trainer in the 60s that was so cheap and reliable that it only was retired from the Brazilian Air Force due to the Grippen NG program, but others countries still use it, and remember, Embraer is the third largest aircraft manufacturer in the world.

    • @chrislj2890
      @chrislj2890 2 дня назад +1

      @@C0lon0
      I'm not trying to trash on them as it looks pretty cool, but this is almost like comparing apples to oranges.

  • @RandyStalding
    @RandyStalding 22 часа назад +4

    OK. I've listened to your video on the specifications of the hot selling C390.
    I have a problem, what is the shortest unimproved landing strip that it can land on. In comparing the C130 to the C390 you failed to mention that. To be useful it would have to be shorter than a C130 landing strip. You put a lot of emphasis on how much the C390 haul in terms of cargo and people. If that were the requirement, we would use something more like a C17.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  19 часов назад

      I will keep this question in mind. Thank you.

  • @KotoyaKamuta
    @KotoyaKamuta День назад

    With the Brazilian government's substantial investment and the rigorous testing of the C-390 prototypes, it's clear that this aircraft is built to excel. Looking forward to seeing it in action.

  • @Kiarikaami
    @Kiarikaami 9 дней назад +3

    The comparison between the C-390 and the C-130J is very insightful.

  • @harrisqwvq
    @harrisqwvq 7 дней назад +3

    Fascinating to see how Embraer’s history with military jets has led to the C-390.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  7 дней назад

      thanks for your comment

  • @abigaillewis23
    @abigaillewis23 2 дня назад +2

    Fascinating to see Embraer taking on the legendary C-130J with such a capable aircraft.

  • @tommypaget2294
    @tommypaget2294 День назад +2

    ***well-sized aircraft for military use……reliable…..and most importantly, a reasonable price-tag!!!…..Embraer C-390 is more economical than C-130J!!! 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷👍👍👍🇧🇷🇧🇷****

  • @PDLM1221
    @PDLM1221 5 дней назад +10

    This is a nice new cargo military or special operation jet hauler I think it could fit in where a C130 or C400 can’t. It shows that it probably has a chance to fit in the whole plan . Good luck with it Embraer.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  4 дня назад

      thanks for comment

  • @AtomicSquirrelHunter
    @AtomicSquirrelHunter 2 дня назад +4

    Can it do a loop?
    Can it land on an Aircraft Carrier? Does it fly through hurricanes?
    I'm not saying the C390 isn't a great plane, just don't be so dismissive of Hercs.

  • @TusharTushar-tl5zt
    @TusharTushar-tl5zt День назад +1

    It’s great to see more competition in the military transport aircraft sector.

  • @brenojunior5303
    @brenojunior5303 8 дней назад +5

    Com certeza e o melhor avião da sua categoria, o verdadeiro faz tudo, e com excelência! Parabéns a Embraer , e ao Brasil, o país de santos Dumon o inventor do avião ✈️🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷👏👏👏

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  8 дней назад

      thanks for your feedback

  • @edsonedi4942
    @edsonedi4942 9 дней назад +9

    Made in Brazil

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  8 дней назад

      yep thanks for your comment

  • @Piia-NooraHagman
    @Piia-NooraHagman 9 дней назад +2

    It’s interesting to see how Embraer is challenging the dominance of the C-130J.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  9 дней назад

      thanks so much for your comment

  • @RajibSksk-uh6un
    @RajibSksk-uh6un День назад +1

    The C-390’s design and features make it a strong contender to replace older cargo planes.

  • @MaikaKohara
    @MaikaKohara День назад

    It's exciting to see Embraer challenging the dominance of the C-130J with the C-390 Millennium. The competition will likely drive further advancements in military aircraft technology.

  • @KinumiEndou
    @KinumiEndou 9 дней назад +2

    The investment and development behind the C-390 show Embraer’s commitment to innovation.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  9 дней назад

      thanks so much for your feedback

  • @citylimits8927
    @citylimits8927 20 дней назад +3

    There may be some applications where there is no substitute for 4 engines, but otherwise, the Embraer is a truly impressive aircraft!

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  20 дней назад

      thanks for feedback

    • @EDurval
      @EDurval 20 дней назад +1

      A questão de 4 motores é devido a baixa confiabilidade dos antigos motores. Na época que o C130 foi projetado, os aviões militares e civis que precisavam efetuar missões longas, tinham 4 motores.
      Hoje isso não é mais necessário, devido a confiabilidade dos motores.

  • @TajCrotty
    @TajCrotty День назад +1

    The journey of the C-390, from its initial announcement to its production, highlights Embraer's commitment to delivering top-notch military aircraft. This is just the beginning for the C-390.

  • @owenkinnan9925
    @owenkinnan9925 День назад +3

    Not so fast. Don't see that happening for quite a while. Reasons are too many to list here.

  • @ArcherHarriet
    @ArcherHarriet День назад

    The C-390's design, inspired by the Embraer 190, showcases the blend of commercial and military aviation expertise. This hybrid approach could set new standards in the industry.

  • @bonasperry8747
    @bonasperry8747 2 дня назад +2

    Já viajei em aviões da embraer e são muito boms,cresci em Massachusetts, 65 anos aqui e tenho orgulho da embraer 🇺🇸🇧🇷cidadão desde 16 anos de idade,tenho 79 agora

  • @octaviovaladaoferreirinhad2689
    @octaviovaladaoferreirinhad2689 11 часов назад +5

    Whoever had the idea of a name for this jet is a PR master: KC meaning from the very start that it's not only a cargo plane, 390 is 3 X 130 and finally the Millennium, meaning the project not only belongs to the 21st century but also reminds of the most badass of the fictional ships, the Millennium Falcon.

  • @CharlesFawziya
    @CharlesFawziya 7 дней назад +5

    The rigorous testing and development of the C-390 Millennium have clearly paid off.

  • @celsotorgozanardi9091
    @celsotorgozanardi9091 21 день назад +10

    Why USA don't buy it, only for made outside we country? We pay tax for maintain Security, way pay more money to make Rich's more rich?????

    • @lordlemmy5108
      @lordlemmy5108 20 дней назад +7

      Embraer can produce in USA, problem is Lockheed lobby.

    • @EDurval
      @EDurval 20 дней назад +3

      A lei americana não permite aquisição de vetores militares se não forem construídos no país.

    • @patriot-wf1er
      @patriot-wf1er 4 дня назад

      Military industrial complex

  • @thiagoctelles1
    @thiagoctelles1 3 дня назад +3

    Sou brasileiro. Um dos poucos orgulhos que estamos tendo em nosso país hoje é a Embraer.

  • @WillReims-s2s
    @WillReims-s2s 4 дня назад +3

    I certainly prefer the Airbus A400M as it is a Turbo-prop aircraft for which the engine maintenance cost is way lower than any jet engine, it also cost a lot less in fuel and has a better range under same MTOW than the C-390. It lands in and take off from shorter runways which enable it to almost land and take off from about any land strip. Its payload is way better under any configuration. It has a better range under any weight (10, 20, 30 tons). The price of a C-390 is definitely way higher as it is a jet.

  • @TimSerras
    @TimSerras 11 дней назад +16

    I know how competent the Portuguese Air Force are delivering military transport, praised frequently by its NATO allies. If they chose Embraer C-390 to replace their C-130 Hercules, then it must be a great aircraft.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  10 дней назад +2

      fact

    • @user-vc2cp8yd9n
      @user-vc2cp8yd9n 8 дней назад

      De Portugal só o idioma força aérea Brasileira não Portuguesa 😂😂😂😂

    • @TimSerras
      @TimSerras 7 дней назад +2

      @@user-vc2cp8yd9n Típica resposta de um terceiro mundista despistado. A Força Aérea Portuguesa escolheu o C-390 para substituir os C-130 actuais. Que tem isso a ver com a língua e com a força aérea brasileira?

  • @DavidJ.Cevallos
    @DavidJ.Cevallos 5 дней назад +3

    The Embraer C-390 is truly impressive! Can't wait to see how it stacks up against the C-130J in real-world operations.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  5 дней назад

      yep

    • @wallacemjr
      @wallacemjr 4 дня назад

      The Brazilian Air Force has already proven this to other military forces and the Portuguese Air Force is also doing this. In Brazil, its performance and savings in maintenance were so great that they accelerated the retirement of the C130 and ended up reducing the order for the 390 as it is so capable that fewer aircraft will be needed. There are nations begging to receive theirs as soon as possible due to the difficulty in operating their C130s. So much so that the first prototype that today flies as a laboratory in the Brazilian Air Force must be loaned until the customer starts receiving their 390.

    • @BlackIc0
      @BlackIc0 3 дня назад

      It has already happened, both the Brazilian and Portuguese air forces use the C130 and C390, the comparison has always occurred.

  • @kirkmanning6232
    @kirkmanning6232 8 часов назад +1

    Lockheed doesn’t have anything to worry about.

  • @paulojr.5910
    @paulojr.5910 5 дней назад +4

    The best C-390

  • @EduardoGomes-fd1jf
    @EduardoGomes-fd1jf 21 день назад +7

    Kc390 fantastic

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  21 день назад

      Thanks for your comment❤

  • @KiahAston
    @KiahAston День назад +1

    The future of military transport aircraft looks bright with the introduction of the C-390 Millennium. Its potential to replace the C-130J signifies a new era in aviation technology.

  • @libertyman3729
    @libertyman3729 7 часов назад +1

    How are our politicians and general's going to get there cut if it's made in Brazil ? 🤔

  • @usngh05
    @usngh05 3 дня назад +3

    You should do a side by side comparison of C-390 and C130J. Speed, capacity - weight and volume , minimum runway needed, ability to land on unpaved landing strips and high altitude landing strips.

    • @RandyStalding
      @RandyStalding 3 дня назад +3

      Emphasis should be made on "the minimum runway needed and the ability to land on unpaved landing strips". For anything else the US already has the C17.

  • @Russinh0
    @Russinh0 3 дня назад +3

    Embraer is the future, already leader of the Regional market, with Boeing Failing with The 737 Max problems and leading to Airbus sink in Orders and cant building that Much A320s at little time, some companies ask embraer if they can build a Narrow body with 150+ Seats to compete with 737 and A320 but they said "only the future will say"

  • @setts3
    @setts3 20 дней назад +1

    As a combat veteran Paratrooper I'm fully acquainted with the earlier C130 versions have trained extensively and jumped many combat missions. She's a wonderful Paratrooper aircraft whether exiting at 600ft port and starboard on static line operations, or freefall HALO tailgating although it gets somewhat chili in the back climbing through 15,000 ft to whatever altitude the mission demanded.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  19 дней назад

      thanks for your sharing

  • @roupa131
    @roupa131 День назад +5

    A sales pitch, nothing else. It might be a good craft but dethroning the other guy? Really?

    • @rav3727
      @rav3727 День назад +1

      Only reason it hasn't dethroned it yet is because the north Americans are so butthurt that they're doing everything in their power to force other countries to keep using their old ass C-130s

  • @byzmack1334
    @byzmack1334 День назад +2

    Did they mention internal space? Weight isn't everything. Something can be right but bulky. The 390 looks tiny.
    You also have to take into consideration the amount of spare parts there are for the c130 out there vs the 390 which is brand new.

  • @KyokoKaai
    @KyokoKaai 9 дней назад +2

    The versatility of the C-390 is going to make a big impact in military transport.

  • @grupogurps1813
    @grupogurps1813 2 дня назад +3

    Por que o c390 não vai substituir o c130? Para começar, a embraer não tem envergadura para produção em larga escala. Não mais. Depois, é um produto com concorrentes fortes. Veja aviões de igual envergadura e nicho, em especial o francês e o japonês. E por último, nunca será aceito nos EUA devido a não ter autonomia de fabricacao, com peças de vários países, o que impede sua implementação. E o fato de que contratos militares dos eua preferirem fabricantes locais, confiáveis em caso de guerra.

  • @classicjetsims
    @classicjetsims 21 час назад +5

    The USAF will never buy it so how good it is doesn't really matter. Maybe other air forces might buy a few.

    • @mauroleira9945
      @mauroleira9945 12 часов назад +2

      Yes, because of your way of doing things. It is a superior, better aircraft. And the good part is that the other nations are realizing it and not paying attention to Washington's "political advantage"! This means a new configuration of power: nations wants the best, not what pleases The USA. Any comments on that?

    • @classicjetsims
      @classicjetsims 12 часов назад +1

      @@mauroleira9945 my way? lol. I'm not American. They never buy non-U.S aircraft though. In some cases like for the Hawk or Harrier, they'll maybe build it under license if they have no decent local alternative.

    • @williamfaulkner7005
      @williamfaulkner7005 10 часов назад +1

      We will not buy it. BRICS. FAFO

    • @jrsceneries7456
      @jrsceneries7456 Час назад

      The hypocritical American protectionism will not allow it.

  • @jhill4874
    @jhill4874 23 часа назад

    This is the same thing that is said about the Airbus A400M. At least the A400M has a slightly higher capacity than the C-130.

  • @eudesgoncalves9346
    @eudesgoncalves9346 3 дня назад +4

    Excelente documentário sobre o KC 390 !!. Parabéns .... !!!!.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  3 дня назад

      many thanks for your support

    • @frederickdouglass7140
      @frederickdouglass7140 3 дня назад

      Isto nao é documentary, is just propaganda.😂😂😂 Like Tesla truck fanboys

  • @BennyCFD
    @BennyCFD 18 дней назад +2

    I agree it looks better than the C-130J. However with that much interest from international buyers Does Embraer have the manufacturing capacity to produce these fast enough to meet deliveries.

    • @alessandropenteado
      @alessandropenteado 17 дней назад +3

      Embraer has a second manufacturing unit solely for military aircraft. This unit can manufacture up to 16 KC390 aircraft per year and the Gripen fighters and the Super Tucano light attack aircraft are also built.

    • @user-sn1cg5zp6d
      @user-sn1cg5zp6d 15 дней назад +3

      @@alessandropenteado It's located in Gaviao Peixoto town and there is an airport builded by Embraer.

  • @จิรานุวัฒน์อินทิพย์

    I'm amazed by Embraer's innovation. The C-390 could indeed set new standards in the industry.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  5 дней назад

      thanks for comment

  • @SaaraLindberg
    @SaaraLindberg 9 дней назад +1

    The C-390’s ability to perform air-to-air refueling is a major advantage.

  • @andrewmccarthy4144
    @andrewmccarthy4144 3 часа назад +3

    You gave us all these spec's, but didn't compare them to the C-130 is is supposed to dethrone. How useful is that? Also, some of the things you bragged about, as in only 2 engines, can be a detriment. If the C-390 loses an engine, it has lost 50% of it's power and capability. What about ability to take-off and land on rough terrain? I believe the C-130 has larger and wider tires.

    • @jerlewis4291
      @jerlewis4291 3 часа назад +1

      He said that it can operate from dirt or grass runways even ones that are not smooth, it can roll over 15" holes.

  • @hellmalm
    @hellmalm 5 дней назад +3

    There’s already jet’s that have similar performance. This is a misunderstanding why you actually want a slower prop plane in the auster conditions.

    • @ReaderStuff-yy3dq
      @ReaderStuff-yy3dq 5 дней назад +1

      Multiple possible reasons. Speed isn't everything.

    • @michelcandidodasilva4701
      @michelcandidodasilva4701 5 дней назад

      O KC 390 foi projetado para ser melhor em tudo em relação ao C 130, é um projeto da Embraer com especificações da Força Aérea Brasileira.

  • @yashashreeg8pl
    @yashashreeg8pl 7 дней назад +3

    Looking forward to seeing how the C-390 Millennium performs compared to the C-130J!

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  7 дней назад

      thank for your feedback

    • @lucasmarques864
      @lucasmarques864 6 дней назад

      Any version of the C-390(Embraer) is superior to the C-130J in all aspects.

    • @wallacemjr
      @wallacemjr 4 дня назад

      Several nations have already verified this and asked for their 390.

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 2 дня назад

      @@lucasmarques864 Not in SHORT field performance, that the C390 flat out DOES NOT HAVE.
      And the C-130J is ALREADY being replaced by current C-130S models anyway.

  • @user-xq8mk5qu8n
    @user-xq8mk5qu8n 19 дней назад +4

    The C--13-0 is a turboprop, not a jet. Such mistakes like this compels me to regard your channel as foolish.

  • @nogvideosaleatorios2722
    @nogvideosaleatorios2722 7 дней назад +7

    🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

  • @AdrianoSilva-ds9vb
    @AdrianoSilva-ds9vb 21 день назад +3

    KC-390 Millennium.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  20 дней назад

      yep that's great aircraft

  • @CRAZYHORSE19682003
    @CRAZYHORSE19682003 День назад

    Time for Boeing to modernize and bring back the YC-14 to eliminate the potential threat of this aircraft in future sales.

    • @rav3727
      @rav3727 День назад +1

      Too bad for you Yankee fellas that Boeing is all in on investing on their hitman instead of even maintaining their shit
      Eventually, not even the north America will be able to stop the C-390's advance in replacing the old ass c-130s worldwide

    • @nadjasunflower1387
      @nadjasunflower1387 23 часа назад

      @@rav3727 c-390 is stiff inferior...they still have a couple of decades before this plane takes over for a c-130. lol as someone else said...for too many reasons to list here. but hey, keep your hopes up. 😁

  • @crispyglove
    @crispyglove 21 час назад +8

    I know this video title is just rage bait to get people to comment, but I have to add that besides all the different capabilities the C-130 has that the KC390 does not, the C-130J is also about half the price of the KC390. The C-130 isn't going anywhere.

    • @rexbentley8332
      @rexbentley8332 20 часов назад

      Not going anywhere, at least until some politician gets in the way. It's what happened to the P3, Boeing had better lobbyists.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  20 часов назад +1

      Each one has its own advantages.