Hearts Broken, Wallets Empty
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- The plaintiff used to date the defendant after she separated from her husband. In total, the plaintiff says he gave the defendant over 80 different loans for personal expenses like gas and cigarettes. Unfortunately, the defendant has not yet paid back the loans, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant admits she accepted the money, but some of the loans were gifts, and she didn’t agree to pay back everything.
Not JM quoting the late great Malcolm X “you’ve been tricked, you’ve been had, you’ve been bamboozled” 😂😂😂
I fell out of bed😂😂😂😂
She used this young man and clearly she is on drugs. The way she talks she is a smooth slick hustler. She knows how to work this lil boys 😂😂😂
3 min in and you can tell this Woman is manipulative
Yep! Clear as day!
And high
@@MsBizzyRaein what way she manipulate
And he was as well...if that was his friend
All three of them nasty
He got played and the husband was in on it. They knew he had the money, so the husband stepped back and let the wife reel him in. Once they got what they needed out of him, the husband stepped back in the picture. The only reason they had him around was to shake him down.
Yup. That’s the game
I agree! She is slime and took advantage of him! Smh
They are both slime to do this
So in my opinion, I believe the husband was in on it Or they're both full of c*** Because why would she need to borrow money from him $2000, if she was making that much money in a month saying that he cost her more than what the car was worth. Goodbye😂😂😂😂
I can't believe judge didn't ask her was she high..she's very high
Or mentally challenged: I just said the same thing. You can see it on her body language and her eyes.
He didn’t even get the 🐱 “you don’t have to sleep with someone to cheat”as Fred would say “YOU BIG DUMMY”😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yoooooo I’m crying becuz I’m at that part and I said the same thing 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂 mannnn they hustled his a$$ 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Oh please they were definitely sleeping together doing it!
@@klovefamous7077ughhhh maybe sexual services were given but o don’t think they actually had sexual intercourse. He said “you don’t have to sleep with someone to cheat on them” meaning they didn’t sleep together.
@shannaholmes833 No, he's slow, he probably thinks that actually means "sleeping" together aka living together. He ensuated several times they were having intercourse.
😂😂😂😂
The plaintiff would make an excellent bookkeeper.
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂⚰️
I hate when the judge makes judgments like this. She owed him money and didn’t even pay for the car!
He claims to have been a friend of her husband, but at the same time he lusted for his wife. So he got what he deserved, schooled.
LOL she played his little thirsty self LOL.
How much time do you have on your hands to be a Judge Mathis hater but still watch his show 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
“He got what he wanted and gave you the bill“ 😂😂 I needed that laugh this morning.
Doyle’s head was on a swivel😭😭😭😭
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 yes
A friendship ruined by a trifling woman and a naive friend. How in the world do you separate from your partner for financial reasons only, and she also said they were separated temporarily😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Drugs was definitely involved
She’s built different 😂
The friend is just a snake
He didn’t recognize game and he got played like a joystick.
Period…
I disagree with this judgment. She owed him much more than that.
The defendant played them both. 😂😂
JM was mean to him for playing his friend 😢😮 11:42 so sad she manipulated him. SO SAD!! But his disloyalty cost him. 😢
But he was cool with it… what goes around comes around. Most ppl won’t date their friends wife or ex wife, but especially during a “separation”.
Judge Mathis was 100% wrong here. First how can she claim to only owe 700 and claim the other 4300 is just gifts and accept that as fact. Second he kept asking the plaintiff to prove everything yet not ask for one piece of proof on how she lost 4000 from a part time job because she didn't have a car.
It’s on him to prove his case tho
@@kimberlysimon7927 I get a feeling he did. He gave all the transactions that added up to the amount. But JM only focused on the $3 and $1
@kimberlysimon7927 she didn't prove her case, Mathis just took her word. Also the lady is suppose to mitigate her damages by taking an Uber or bus to get the work. Not having a car is not an excuse for not working
She’s a big user, but he was wrong for nickel and dimming every little thing
Right!!!
No he wasn’t & IM would be wrong not to give him nothing
This dude was played like a bad game of Monopoly.
The defendant looks mentally disturbed or addicted. The way she holds her head, her eyes.. she off!
Just Mathis really don’t rule on Law. WTF
She is lying about everything😂
The plaintiff unfortunately comes off as a chump. Allegedly...he was mad af and petty he didn't hit
First she already said she was away from her husband for financial reasons & she was being a cougar acting like she was gone throw him some cat an played him the whole time smh😂 it's so clear but hey he'll learn (Hopefully)😂😂
💯💯
Those sores on her arm definitely says she’s on some form of drug…
Judge Mathis that older woman used that young man.
Crazy how easy it is to see her lies
Having two men and still no money is embarrassing
Judge Mathis make judgments in his feelings tighten up judge😂😂😂
Why did she walk in like that 😂
A weird trio…
Drug addicts
The defendant and her husband are addicts. I think the judgment was fair. The plaintiff has the burden of proof. He didn’t prove his case. He was in love/ lust, she never paid him back and he allowed her to rake up 86 loans in total. She played with him but he was playing a dangerous game by getting involved with his friends wife. The comment ab her being on meth was all true 😂😂
Hahaha when she shook her head no to using meth lol
Judge messed up on this , ughhhh
86 loans???😮😮😮
She’s high as a kite
😂😂😂 I’m screaming he hurt asl 🤣salty then a bih
Judge Mathis gets on my nerves. I’ve realised how to win a case with him Be a woman then sell him a story about how you were vulnerable and taken advantage of… It’s an automatic win.
Or be from LGBTQ community
Facts
He’s annoying as shit
You must be confused, the fact that he fall in love with someone's wife and want her out of her marriage is not on your nerves? What a silly world we dwell.
@@bryanjohnson8982Your part of destruction and I give it to you.what goes around comes around. Strong man
She ran game on judge just like she did those two suckers in the courtroom 😂😂
Oh. She’s an actress.
That’s right why lend money to a cheater😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I love this judgement, you betrayed your friend
I really believe Judge has dealt with a deceitful friend either trying to get his wife or been with his wife. He always go from 0 to 80 when that is mentioned. He starts off joking then brings the hammer. He always shows his personal dealings in cases throughout the years.
Judge wasn’t playing lmfao
Yeah she’s high or something but she knew what she was doing… and the husband… well, he knows what’s going on as well. Whew. Mess
Her hair is beautiful
🤣😂🤣Woman controls everything 😂🤣😂…
He so unfair on the plaintiff i feel for him she cold hearted 🙄
There's something really methed up sbout this case !!
They are all weird ‼️
Very!
The defendant and her husband are addicts.
Smh this was annoying
I KNEW it-this woman is def on something…JM shld see this plain as day!
Why did the judge give a loser a reward ????
"Overly nice" pfft...please
😂😂😂😂😂at the end of the case he still talking about proof,they been together and she got almost 10k outta him total
Hello Judge Mathis. Let's see how petty this case is going to get 😅. Please let this be a learning lesson for these two. He is too petty and heart broken. He got played.
These people clearly give me the impression that they are " recreational" users with heavy on the "recreation😊🙏".
They all on that stuff😂
The defendant said she and her husband separated for financial reasons. Umh!
He was in on this game.
Judge Mathis was on one today with this case
The judge was sweet on this junkie😅 Grocery shopping at three o'clock in the morning what the absolute fuck😅
THIS WOMEN IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED WHAT A TOXIC MARRIAGE I WOULD NOT BE SURPRISE IF THEY HAD A 3SOME❤😊
She knew what she was doing now her husband will get her back
The husband looks like Adam Sanders
This is how people .. murder lovers etc. Playing with needy people
She said that she was BORROWING his car starting in March. He agreed to sell her the car with the first payment being made on August 31st. August 30th is when he took the car back. The agreement hadn't yet been made. No, she wasn't late, but he was still the rightful owner of the car and can repossess it, as the agreement was not in effect until the payment was made the next day.
She 100000% slept with him lol gave him all he wanted for the money. The husband is a goofy and knows it
So your car got legally repoed and you didn't call the cops? That tells me that you knew you weren't supposed to legally have it. I'm not saying she didn't have permission to borrow it,but if you're suing for something that you claim is yours,and you didn't do anything then that tells me you knew that it wasn't legally yours.
I need them cigarettes 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
It was the dollar loans for me 😂😂 I mean poor kid but damn I feel bad but he gotta wisen up if you wanna deal with older women 💯
I just started the case and now im at work pissed because why is she able to to tell her background story without interruptions, judgement, questions about her character, she's 15yrs older, she came on to him, she was that man wife not lil friend or girlfriend, and then she talking about she was having issues with her husband but talked to his younger. Unmarried friend about it. She should never even. E left alone in same room as that man. Even her eyes look like she tired of the game she runs child
Angel knows she was with him she’ll reap back her dirt
I hope she started some kind of business with all those loans
He was mad in love showering her with money and gifts. Cruel world but he’s only suing because she got back with the husband. Don’t be stupid next time that’s all!
Hate how he treated plaintiff it drives me mad if a women said what the plaintiff said he be sympathetic or all nicey nice 😡🤦🙄
He shouldn’t have given any of them a penny.
He loved a woman but was expecting his money back from loaning $1 & $3? Lol lord
How did this man end up for a car that she never made a payment for?
Judge you use to be an instigator when you was young 😅😊😂
BABY…86 loans for a friend?
She seems high
Just heard the announcement.. 86 unpaid loans!! How Gucci say it “well damn!” 😂😂
And Judge Mathis wrong. Your so-called friends are the very ones to "borrow" $1 here, $5 there, and then big money to pay their bills. I believe the guy. Can anybody on here say nobody has ever borrowed one dollar or five dollars from them and not paid it back? My own family and so-called friends did stuff like this to me all the time--until I put a stop to it.
Norman Bates, where's your mother???
jM you was wrong & the BAR Association needs to step in & investigate you
😂😂😂 that’s a stretch
Bia judgment from judge Mathis
Lord have mercy
And dont forget Judge " Plymouth Rock landed on his ass too" Happy Black History Month ✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿🖤💚❤️
how she standing there speaking don't take advantage if you have all these jobs why you asking him money ?? maam you have been taking advantage of him
Plaintiff learned a hard lesson.
As Judge Joe Brown used to say:
"You pay to play
and things don't go your way
Now ya' wanna weep n' moan
and call it a loan"
My thing is why didn't the judge ask who had the car title? Yes he's vindictive and spiteful,but if he had the title then it's legally his not hers so he had a right to repo it. Not saying she didn't have the title but how does the judge know who has it? I would of definitely asked
Karma will get the lady. And that was his car in his name. I don't know how in 1 month the lady couldn't have taken the so-called $2,000 she claims to already have in her possession to pay for the vehicle and went to a car dealership to get one on a down payment. Judge Mathis got this one wrong. He should've said the lady had plenty of time to get another vehicle. Neither had anything in writing about the car.
You can’t repo the vehicle if he admitted in court he sold her the vehicle and admitted that he ONLY took it back because he saw her with her husband at Walmart and alleged drug usage on her end. Without proof of drug usage in the car or a damaged vehicle (by showing pictures) so he messed up his own case and then knit-picking through the funds he gave her. Showing $100 or more loans on his bank history would’ve been more believable. But come on now $5 for cigarettes and $1 for juice $1 for gas $3 for gas. That’s a gift not a loan💯🤷🏾♀️😒🙄😂
@@shanellwyche4668 SHE HAD THE MONEY. THE LADY COULD'VE GONE TO A DEALERSHIP AND PUT A DOWN PAYMENT ON ONE. SHE ACTED LIKE THERE WAS NO OTHER WAY FOR HER TO GET TO WORK. WHICH WILL ALWAYS BE A LIE. I WALKED 6 MILES IN MASSACHUSETTS TO GET TO WORK FROM THE COLLEGE I ATTENDED. Until I got a job closer to campus within 1 mile and I walked it, even in the snow. THERE IS ALWAYS ANOTHER WAY TO GET TO WORK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@christinejones7902 true but why didn't she call the police if it was stolen or illegaly repoed? Why didn't he ask to see a police report or something to confirm her story? If she didn't that tells me that she didn't care enough about the car until she got sued. Or that she had those needles in her car and she didn't want the police to know. I'm sorry but something about the car story didnt pass the sniff test for me.
@@shanellwyche4668 My thing is she never paid anything on the car. She was borrowing it with the intention to buy it. The sale didn't even begin without the first payment.
He also said the loans added up to 5000. Which means there had to be several high value loans. JM just didn't acknowledge it or even gave him an opportunity to mention it. He was only focused on the $1 loan he saw.
I'm here My Beloved Favorite Judge ***ASHAY ***
Get the money from your husband
Judge was looking for a way to rule against plaintiff when he said defendant husband was his friend and he cheated with his friends wife but didn’t take in to account defendant didn’t have her kids but husband was living with her which means the state or family has her kids and then drugs judge know if she would’ve got pulled under influence or with drugs in car then a repo would’ve taken place
This court is not rooted in morality she is clearly manipulative but the fact remains he couldn’t prove those were loans and he performed an illegal car repo. She is smarter than both her husband and his friend and she had the winning case 😢
I don't like her attitude
People like the defendant who constantly say “OK” at the end of every sentence is to confirm you believe the lie so she can continue to the next lie. The plaintiff is slow.