4090 VS M2 Max: DaVinci Resolve Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 июл 2024
- Let's drag race a 4090 PC Monster Build against my Apple Silicon M2 Max Macbook Pro by running tests in DaVinci Resolve. 3, 2, 1... GO!!!!
Want exclusive course content and in depth tutorials? Join as a Member!
/ @jakefelzien
(This also supports the channel, thank you)
Hire me: ytjobs.co/talent/profile/1356...
Music/sfx I use: www.epidemicsound.com/referra...
(one month free, and it helps me out a bit)
instagram: @jakefelzienfilm for updates and video pictures
#4090 #macbookpro #videoediting
Main Camera: Panasonic S5
Main cinematic camera: Black Magic Pocket Cinema 4k (amzn.to/2XvWWgR)
Drone: DJI Spark (amzn.to/2xGnZeJ)
Action Camera: GoPro Hero 7 (amzn.to/2XzzBep)
Music I use: www.hooksounds.com/ref/jakefe...
Disclaimer: I get some kickback (at no additional cost to you) if you purchase through these links, so this is a great way to support the channel! 
Кино
I'm sure you won't feel any difference with a weaker device. But if you want to really see RTX 4090 power you should check out 3d rendering. The RTX will eat your m2 Mac just like an apple😅.
So you choose 100 soldier of ants over 100 humans soldier because they are stronger in relationship of their body size😂.
Don’t do 3D right now and don’t care about it. Just resolve and Final Cut.
My cousin games. Which is why he built the machine. I just wanted to compare editing since I was curious.
His machine would obviously wreck mine in both gaming and 3D
@@jakefelzien But you said it like Mac and RTX are in the same level. You would win a racing match vs Bugatti if the path is just 10 meters, but if you make the path 1km Bugatti would win really easy.
@@stoychotrenchev4443 Only in a fantasy world ants can carry weapons and are smarter than humans and that's true for your Mac as well only in a fantasy world it would win vs RTX . Why it's so hard for you to comprehend this?, oh wait I get it now because you are a Mac user.
@@stoychotrenchev4443 when I say Mac I mean all the labtop that apple created. Intel plus Nvidia is just like a movie with two super stars while apple is the movie with one super star, which one is better? And if you ask the majority of people they would say Bugatti is better than Ferrari.
Really cool video! I'm about to update my editing rig and am of course struggling with the age old Mac vs. PC question. Just one note: Apparently your cousins PC is rocking a AMD CPU? I'm pointing this out because I believe Intel is the only CPU brand capable of decoding H.264 and H.265 in the background, like Apple Silicon also does. This makes video editing much smoother and is the reason why I'm looking to update my setup.
That makes a ton of sense 🤔
Wish we got some H265 rendering comparisons. S5ii 6k clips in H265 really break editing flows up harsher than BRAW by a lot for obvious reasons. Good tests all around.
We could definitely do this 🤘
Same here! My main device is also an M2 Max MBP that I bought officially refurbished. Just couldn't justify paying full price for it. And for the 1 year or so that I've daily driven it's absolutely fantastic when it comes to editing on resolve and general web browsing. And the biggest advantage I think the MBP trumps anything else is obviously the efficiency. However, the 32G ram sometimes do run out and can be very annoying and I couldn't play games on it. I mean, with playcover and whiskey you could play SOME games SOME of the time, but it's been really unreliable and the raw horsepower of M2 Max still isn't enough to handle higher graphic settings.
So I bought a PC, not with a 4090 but a 4080. But I do think this will be better off for me on both ends. Still keeping the MBP tho, for traveling.
Having both would be awesome!!! 😎
@@jakefelzien for sure man, but I reckon my MBP is gonna be gathering dust in the corner for quite a while now😂
How much memory is on your MacBook and is it a major factor for those test you did ?
32 GB. If you’re doing 4K video, photo editing, and either Final Cut or DaVinci I would recommend 32 at least.
In DaVinci you can get away with less (did a 16GB Mac mini for a long time)
But it isn’t ideal for longer lifetime usage.
@@jakefelzien yes I’m using DaVinci resolve on my 2021 MacBook Pro ( 16gb ) so I have to be very selective with the effects I use .
I'd be interessted what the price difference is between the two systems.
Or did I miss that?
Within a few hundred bucks. Both were around the 4K mark
@@jakefelzien Means you can get upgradable performance for half the price of the mac?
yes@@salat and no, the MAcbook pro has keyboard/mouse/screen which isn't the same with a desktop obvs. It might be more of a comparison to do $4k v $4k, desktop to desktop. And I use both by the way, including an M1 macstudio so see the benefits of both.
Was there lots of 10bit 422 footage used in the tests? AMD cpus have no ASIC/s media engines, and both nvidia and amd gpus do not accelerate 10bit 422, only intel cpus do. So generally intel is the pick for video editors.
I wonder if that was the equalizer 🤔 did use 422 for tests if I remember correctly
whats the specs on you MacBook?
M2 Max, 32gigs of unified
You are getting your creative work done on only 32gb? I had the m3 pro base spec and it only has 18gb of ram, which is like student laptop from 7 years ago grade. I Couldn't bget my video or photo work done on it and I constantly felt the slow down from the ram starvation. I was wondering if the 36gb max would be enough but I kinda doubted it. But if you're saying you're getting simmilar performacne to a good desktop pc with only 32gb then maybe it would work for me.
How much ram did the pc have?@@jakefelzien
my guy, check m.2 speed, like dividing files between 2 also, and fyi AMD is faster at braw and fusion stuff. good test tho
Might have to make a round 2 it sounds like 🤘
No doubt Resolve is more optimized for macs. BM def has bias for apple and even they've released Resolve for macos first decades ago but Fusion on the other hand was first developed on DOS and then ported to windows and has been a windows exclusive until BM bought them and then ported it to macos and linux so if you were using Fusion studio, you would've noticed some huge differences.
But other than that, apple silicons have media engine inside to boost/accelerate certain workflows with encoding and decoding which is why it's being praised by video editors so much but for any pro 3d work it's an absolute dodo water. So if you get a PC, the intel ones have ipgu in it which helps with intel quick sync and that helps with video encoding and decoding. And make sure you get Nvidia GPU. DO NO GET AMD GPU for any creative work, NVIDIA with its studio drivers has optimized most creator-related programs and will fly with most GPU accelerated programs.
Yeah this is good to know for sure 👍
I am a 4090 editor. Things it does at about 2xs the speed of apple. Noise reduction, magic mask, and depth mapping. Also, others, but this is off the top of my head. If those are common things you use, consider a 4090.
We bought pre built dell Xps with 4090s for around $3400. That's not a horrible price imo.
Also, you didn't say what CPU you used. If you're doing video editing, you want an Intel cpu. One with the integrated gpu. Intel offer their chips with and without the gpu. You want there gpu for like 20 extra bucks. This gives you more hardware decoders. If you are editing h.265 10bit 4.2.2 footage without the intel gpu, you don't have hardware decoders, and it tanks performance.
This is good to know, he was rocking an AMD CPU which could have been a big reason for what we were seeing.
But yeah, like you said there are definitely wins for a 4090 build.
But my point and story was if you like apple, you can go Apple Silicon these days and not feel like you are missing out on much at all in terms of video editing :)
(obviously 3d and gaming aren't part of this video for a reason)
@jakefelzien yes both are great machines to work with. Keep grinding with either if it's what you've got!
May I ask what is your fps when Magic Masking? I just got the 4090 and I can't see any different upgrading from my 2080. I get 1.3 seconds for a single frame. Got the studio version. i9-9900K with 64GB RAM 3200mhz.
@ranyalbegwein7470 I normally get as fast or faster than real-time. So yes, something is wrong, or you're using a weird codec.
@@jessecumberledge4530 Thanks you for the quick response! I see now that I was using Magic Mask from the Fusion page not the color page. I guess there's a big difference, since now I actually see that from the Color page Magic Mask runs very fast. Is Fusion more CPU dependent and my i9-9900K is simply slow for it?
Now do AV1 encoding! 8k Video? Or try to upgrade anything in the Mac, or maybe get it stolen from your backpack - Comparing Apples to PC :)
Sounds like all good tests for an episode two maybe 🤔
Kyle. Chase me.
Ok now Kyle, hold your PC and I’ll chase you
comparison sucks.
How so?
Thumbs down.
👎👎👎👎
You Can't steal Marques Brownlee's style of movements. Unacceptable. The video does not make sense. Just because you use Nvidia 4090 doesn't make a PC Clone a beast.
Marques didnt invent digital zoom and almost certainly doesnt even edit his own videos.@@SwiftSystems1