@@1marcelfilms How do you know that? You have not tried it. It is built by the same company that does most of the disposables so how is it worse? I don't mind honest criticism but this is just vitriol for no reason.
It takes twice as many photos because each frame is half the size of a standard 35mm picture. The downside is that image quality is not quite as good especially if you make big enlargements. To answer your question the rewind time is the same.
![Kodak H35 Half Frame 35mm Film Camera - Review/Shooting with Strangers in Brooklyn [Instant Review]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ge5KS4vkkhM/mqdefault.jpg)
"Are we really only halfway through" is how I feel everytime I shoot half frame hahaha but I love the video
Try our new UltraPan 18 and avoid that feeling
Any relation to Agfaphoto Half Frame? 👀
No
No its even shittier. Dont buy. Also dont buy the agfa.
they are both worse built than a disposable camera.
@@1marcelfilms How do you know that? You have not tried it. It is built by the same company that does most of the disposables so how is it worse? I don't mind honest criticism but this is just vitriol for no reason.
@@davemarshall9302 Actually I had both. And sent them both back. Its junk.
So if it takes twice as many photos, does it take twice as long to rewind? 😆
It takes twice as many photos because each frame is half the size of a standard 35mm picture. The downside is that image quality is not quite as good especially if you make big enlargements. To answer your question the rewind time is the same.
@@olp1e -- I guess you missed my smiley-face emoji, I was joking with my question -- I do understand how half-frame cameras work....