Not so fun fact...older versions of the same B-61 bomb could have a blast yield of 300 kilotons or more, which is about the same yield as the multiple warheads carried on the USA's Minuteman III ICBMs...and is more than 15 times the yield of that first atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Also, the B-61 is a hydrogen bomb, which is the thing that Oppenheimer did NOT want the USA to develop, and thus got him barred from all nuclear research as a result of his security clearance not being renewed.
@@bradthackston5217 Everyone always seems to assume that any nuclear exchange will lead to the full use of every nuke on the planet...and that is a possible scenario...but it is highly unlikely that all the nukes would be used. People also always assume that the nukes will all be ground bursts with maximum fallout, but that is exceedingly unlikely, since most nukes nowadays are used in air bursts where the fireball does not touch the ground...which vastly reduces the amount of radioactive material being spread around.
Don't forget about the MAKO being announced for the F-35 just a few weeks ago. It's a hypersonic missile that can have a nuke on it. Even though the time to target is about 6ish minutes, intercepting it has about a 5 second window after it has flown for 200 miles.
The point of "beast mode" is to reduce the number of airframes in a theater, drastically reducing the logistics needed to support operations. It's also a good stop-gap while waiting on more specialized platforms that can't ardive until after radar is down. 1st wave: destroy radar, 2nd wave: f35 destroy ground targets, 3rd wave could be other airframes that can do the bulk of the air to ground missions after that.
The 'weird' looking ones are cruise missiles, and we make nuclear versions of those too. Thy are stealth and fly just feet above the waves or ground for hundreds of miles at subsonic speed.
One part I did not see you react to right away... 0.3KT nuke. That is an extremely dangerous size for a nuke, because now it is very very very localized, and that makes for a higher chance of it being an option to be used. Now add that the next option is 1.5KT about 10x less power than Hiroshima and you have a couple of nuke packages that some very hawkish people might not see as too bad of an option...
Yeah when the video mentioned them shifting to lower yields is when I started getting alittle nervous because usage becomes much more likely in that case
@@lordkresnik2873 it depends upon the enemy. Russia and the US have similar nuclear doctrine. Even the use of a low yield device automatically authorizes the use of the entire arsenal. In the case of the US it is the same of any other WMD. We don’t (officially) have chemical or biological weapons, so we use nukes instead. Which makes using any of them a lifetime supply of bad ideas.
NGAD and loyal wingman are the next fighters. NGAD is a 6th gen Air Superiority Fighter and will have many new technologies. It will be accompanied by 2-3 Loyal wingman AI powered fighter drones that the NGAD pilot can control. It is gonna be pretty crazy.
All of our newer planes are stealth but they all have the capability to negate stealth for more firepower if needed and if you keep in mind that one air craft carrier has 70ish planes you could send 20 planes stealth to take out radar stations fallowed by a delayed 20 in beast mode to mop up and continue to hit ground targets still having all the capability’s of a normal fighter and leaving 30 planes on the aircraft for carrier defenses
The new "Mako" missile is also amazing full hypersonic speed and can fit in an F-35/F-22. Inboard the F-35 can now carry 6 Air to Air missiles due to block 4 upgrade.
F-16 Fighting Falcons in a few NATO countries on American bases could carry one nuke on its belly. Americas way back decades around the SALT( strategic arms limitation treaty) which could come visit American and Soviet bases ar random and count how many nuke carrying bombers each other had. Meanwhile the F-16s would sit out openly and there was nothing that let you know that this one plane could make most of an individual city go "bye-bye". Turkey was the most notorious of this. Later Turkey was given info that they had American nukes on their soil .Those "shiny" projectiles were the ones. Pilots' and mechanics' families had their, I do believe it was 30 minute drills ,may have been an hour drill. Quick pack and hop on board a flight away from the Turkish/American base because it wouldn't be there in between an hour or two after the F-16s took off. Interesting right.
And that's the plan the f35 would fly close and designate targets while the regular fighters carry and fire missiles from safety that's guided in by the f35. That's why networking is so important now.
Royal marine Please react to the (paramedic force 5 bridge creek and moore, Oklahoma tornado May 3 1999). It's the first responders response to the 1999 moore, Oklahoma F5 tornando. I currently work as an EMT with EMSA in tulsa, Oklahoma. We use this video for training new hires on mass casualty response. The camera crews riding with these ambulance crews were making a Tv show on the day and life of first responders the day moore got hit. Most people have no idea what happen in the aftermath of a tornado. This video is a great watch to understand what it takes to triage a mass casualty incident.
B1-B bomber or the B-one is unable to carry nukes due to a treaty. Something about being able to fly a bomber a supersonic speeds wtih a nuke. Yet, then we have these fighter jets capable of the same thing as the B1-B could be capable of...
Finland stated when they joined that they were interested in the NATO partner nuclear sharing program, if only to make Russia second guess starting another Winter War.
Ehh what people don’t talk about. But isn’t classified all of our nukes minus a few. Are selectable yeild, uk to 1.5 megatons. And some up to 3 Mt, as only a few convinces of hydrogen control the power. It can be vented, very easily before detonation, also very quickly, depended on need. Almmof the US’s warheads. Short of one or two. Are scalable, up to 3 Mt warheads, in the same size and weight. Short of a few ounces of hydrogen. But the most common is 1.5 Mt, which is stupid, will gut any city ever made.
They used to take the wings off an F-117 stealth fighter with a nuke inside, jam it into a cargo plane and it could land on almost any runway or road on earth! Take it out, wings back on. This terrified the Russians to no end as these "pop-up nuclear sites" would be impossible to find and stop. Imagine an F-117 taking off a small rural road in Bosnia at night headed for.....
Love watching your channel. You seem like a really good dude and I thank you for your service to both here in the US and the UK. When you serve in Militaries of our 2 countries, you're actually serving the world for the common good. That sacrifice speaks volumes about you as a human being. Thank you for that. Now keep the fuckin videos coming daily, bro. Lol.
NGAD and Loyalwingman will be about 5 years before we see them. Unless something happens politically to fast track them. US does not see a threat large enough to require them right now. We literally have a "playbook" that list which decade specific technologies need to be perfected by to keep the ALREADY planned future weapons completion dates.........for the next 50 yers.
Hey there, first time commenting on one of your videos. Dunno if it was mentioned in the video or not, but the F-35 is not yet capable of carrying actual nuclear weapons, as that is a very complex system that has to be added onto the aircraft. It can carry weapons that are the size and weight of the B61 thermonuclear gravity bomb, or a training dummy of a B61, but not a live B61 as it doesn't have the authentication and arming systems that are needed in order to be able to actually perform a nuclear strike. The decision to make it nuclear-capable has been made, that's true, and the systems I've mentioned will in fact be introduced as part of the wide range of upgrades that are getting rolled out in the upcoming Block-4 F-35's. It's possible that older Block 3 and 2 F-35's might get similar upgrades further down the line, but right now it's only planned for the Block 4. Also, it's become a bit of a personal pet peeve of mine, hearing people criticizing the F-35 program for ballooning costs, or that the aircraft was a waste, or that it doesn't work...it's a load of shite with a side of bull that's being pushed by dumb or ignorant people that want to sound smart, journalists who just have to shit out as many articles as they can to get revenue from clicks, or people with ulterior motives like the douchebag Pierre Sprey and the rest of the "Airforce Mafia". I would recommend looking up LazerPig's video on the F-35: ruclips.net/video/CH8o9DIIXqI/видео.html Thank you for your service! o7
NGAD. Next Generation Air Dominance Fighter. A 6th Gen fighter capable of both unmanned and manned combat. Estimated to cost 300 million. For example, the F-35A is 80 million. However NGAD is leagues ahead of the F-35. I believe it’s supposed to enter service around the late 2030’s. F/A-XX is the navy’s version of NGAD.
This makes a "accidental" nuke on the battlefield grow exponentially. To me it also puts a large emphasis on the shoot down of these aircraft by adversaries to gain a unexploded nuke from the wreckage before the missle can arm its nuclear payload for explosion or a hostile takeover of the air facility by hostile forces to gain the armaments themselves. They probably have contingencies for all these scenarios, but, the only winning move is not to play in the ballpark to begin with.
It's not the explosion that causes the most damage but the fires started from the thermal output that goes out so much further that blast maps tell you about
A single F35 without wing loaded bombs acts as a stealth scout ahead of the bomb trucks and directs them to targets before the enemy can detect the "trucks".
Given that F-35 can use swarms, it can just hang around and pilot extremely stealthy swarms of drones that can do pretty much anything any pilot could want it to do, also it extends F-35's eyes on the skies quite a bit.
Hey Luke, not sure if you've messed with VR yet, but if you have a headset and wanna try something fun, check out VTOL VR. I'm a former American Marine and its such a blast. Not quite a full Flight Sim but more realistic then Ace Combat (which is still a great game). You get several options of aircraft. They are all fictional because of copyright reasons but you can tell they are all based on real aircraft. These include an Osprey, F-35, F-22, Eurofighter type thing, an F-14 if it the F-14 was built with today's tech (Electronic Warfare), and for funzies an Apache Attack Helo. The later supports a buddy in the front seat operating weapons and you in the back flying. Check it out my brotha. Im a former american Marine and I approve this message.
Tea..if you ask nicely. If they are worried about radar and stealth you could just fly upside down lol. Makes me wonder why missiles are all on the underside. Put them all on the top of the wings and body and ground radar will still bounce off the smooth underside :P
Mate, If you're interested in the "next" aircraft the closest thing is TEMPEST or the F/A XX program there is also the B-21 Raider, to my knowledge though there is no 7th gen programs yet publicly known about.
You will want to check out DCS: Digital Combat Simulator. You have to buy the airframes, and download mods for things like the f22, but you can fly it there, and, as far as I know... You don't have a grind to fly what you want. Just buy and go.
nuclear warheads have come a long way from the early days where one weak bomb took up a whole plane, back in the 70s, they used to have a nuclear artillery shell, and it used to be a semiregular occurence for troops to train carrying a warhead, and parachute into "enemy" territory
You have to remember that the F-35's heavy loaded capabilities aren't necessarily aimed at the USAF. The USN and USMC have planned to heavily rely on F-35s in the future when the F/A-18s and Harriers are fully phased out, and there are a number of other nations whose only fixed wing attack aircraft are, or are planned to be only F-35, like Norway, Netherlands, Singapore, etc..
The new weapon can literally hook up to any US air craft with the correct hookups and beings that 90 percent of the US planes use those hook ups I think even the a 10 warthog has the same hookups
Not sure if it can carry the MOAB but that is one massive bomb. There are some which are so large they cannot be delivered by a traditional bomber and need to be dropped from cargo aircraft.
Well, if the F35 defeated everyone in the "war games", then of course this is the best aircraft! LOL Tell me how this super duper jet will go through a layered modern air defense system. What is he like in aerial combat with other planes? A question! Yes, this is clearly a good modern fighter jet. But don't think that this is an invincible super weapon! Something can always go wrong.
To be honest it might be able to make a cup of tea. There is an approved electric kettle for US aircraft, the question would be does it have any accessory power that kettle could access.
Could the reasoning behind using the f35 in beast mode rather than, say an f15, be that even with all the avionics, targeting, networking, etc upgrades that they are doing to the legacy aircraft, the f35 is just more advanced and capable in those areas? Over and above is stealth capabilities, it is a monstrously powerful super computer too...
I love how you note how good the US Military News channel is and then get frustrated when they completely lose focus in the middle of the video and start quoting random nonsense. Just like they do in 90% of their other videos!
Hey buddy you should check out the hypersonic missile that can be carried in the internal weapon's bay of the F-35 A and F-22's!! 😊 It's a really advanced missile by Lockeed Martin
its a nice looking plane indeed, but still the delays and the fact that 29% of their fleet is fully mission capable and the block 4 upgrade gets delayed and delayed is kinda sad
Doesn’t the F-35 have a “swarm” type feature with having one pilot aircraft and a small group of AI controlled F-35s that operate on info from the main F-35?
If you want to see another good movie about the making of the atomic bomb, go watch Fat Man & Little Boy (1989). It too had an all-star cast (Paul Newman, John Cusack, Laura Dern, Bonnie Bedelia, John C. McGinley).😉 Peace🕊
Whars exacly the point of freefall nukes ? Any enemy worth nuking would have enogh airdefence defence worth using standoff nukes agist. A glide kit for the bomb or a nuke cruise missle fiting its weapon bay would make more sense.
Finnish HX program opened this veil a bit, not much but a bit. Turns out F-35 has 47/1 KD ratio against other Western jets (F-22 not included) 😃This was in preset area, guess what it can do without restrictions.
Missile truck is what an F-15 is for.
Not so fun fact...older versions of the same B-61 bomb could have a blast yield of 300 kilotons or more, which is about the same yield as the multiple warheads carried on the USA's Minuteman III ICBMs...and is more than 15 times the yield of that first atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
Also, the B-61 is a hydrogen bomb, which is the thing that Oppenheimer did NOT want the USA to develop, and thus got him barred from all nuclear research as a result of his security clearance not being renewed.
I guess we will see what all the fuss is about with these bombs in the next couple years I don’t think it’s going to be as deadly as everybody thinks
@@bradthackston5217 Everyone always seems to assume that any nuclear exchange will lead to the full use of every nuke on the planet...and that is a possible scenario...but it is highly unlikely that all the nukes would be used. People also always assume that the nukes will all be ground bursts with maximum fallout, but that is exceedingly unlikely, since most nukes nowadays are used in air bursts where the fireball does not touch the ground...which vastly reduces the amount of radioactive material being spread around.
Appreciate the info I watched the film recently was a bit too slow and confusing but I got the gist of it.
@@iKvetch558we will be living in a FALLOUT game lol
@@riccccccardo Well...that depends on how big of a nuclear war there ends up being...but at least there is no Vault-Tec for us to worry about. 😜
No way the F35 looks better than the F22.
(Deep breath) I’d intercept me.
Ehh, agree to disagree cause the F-35 gets bonus points for VTOL capabilities
15 years ago at a place... looking it in the face. These are not the F-22's you are looking for.
@@SomeOrdinaryJanitorthat doesn’t have anything to do with looks….
@@SomeOrdinaryJanitoronly the Marines B variant has VTOL.
Lookup the NGAD program, that's the future of the Fighter program.
Don't forget about the MAKO being announced for the F-35 just a few weeks ago. It's a hypersonic missile that can have a nuke on it. Even though the time to target is about 6ish minutes, intercepting it has about a 5 second window after it has flown for 200 miles.
The point of "beast mode" is to reduce the number of airframes in a theater, drastically reducing the logistics needed to support operations. It's also a good stop-gap while waiting on more specialized platforms that can't ardive until after radar is down. 1st wave: destroy radar, 2nd wave: f35 destroy ground targets, 3rd wave could be other airframes that can do the bulk of the air to ground missions after that.
The 'weird' looking ones are cruise missiles, and we make nuclear versions of those too. Thy are stealth and fly just feet above the waves or ground for hundreds of miles at subsonic speed.
One part I did not see you react to right away... 0.3KT nuke. That is an extremely dangerous size for a nuke, because now it is very very very localized, and that makes for a higher chance of it being an option to be used. Now add that the next option is 1.5KT about 10x less power than Hiroshima and you have a couple of nuke packages that some very hawkish people might not see as too bad of an option...
Unless they’re fighting the US or Russia, because we have the same nuclear doctrine.
Yeah when the video mentioned them shifting to lower yields is when I started getting alittle nervous because usage becomes much more likely in that case
@@lordkresnik2873 it depends upon the enemy. Russia and the US have similar nuclear doctrine. Even the use of a low yield device automatically authorizes the use of the entire arsenal. In the case of the US it is the same of any other WMD. We don’t (officially) have chemical or biological weapons, so we use nukes instead. Which makes using any of them a lifetime supply of bad ideas.
We wouldn't use it for the same reason we're warning russia not to.
In the 70s and 80s there were teams of army Green berets that had backpack nukes one person could carry a nuke in a back pack
Most US fighters get certified for nukes.
NGAD and loyal wingman are the next fighters. NGAD is a 6th gen Air Superiority Fighter and will have many new technologies. It will be accompanied by 2-3 Loyal wingman AI powered fighter drones that the NGAD pilot can control. It is gonna be pretty crazy.
@2:05 " Can it make you a cup of tea ? " no...but the B2 Spirit can make a cup of coffee. 😁😎
“F*ckin’ Brits!”
- John “Soap” MacTavish
All of our newer planes are stealth but they all have the capability to negate stealth for more firepower if needed and if you keep in mind that one air craft carrier has 70ish planes you could send 20 planes stealth to take out radar stations fallowed by a delayed 20 in beast mode to mop up and continue to hit ground targets still having all the capability’s of a normal fighter and leaving 30 planes on the aircraft for carrier defenses
You should check out Habitual Line Crosser for his aircraft content.
1:52 “Fuckin’ Brit’s”
- John “Soap” MacTavish, Modern Warfare II (2022), mission: “Alone”
HAHAHAHAHAAH. OMG. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It doesn't need to make you a cup of tea. It can fly by itself while you sit inside your bunker sipping tea the grunts made you
"there is nothing the F-35 lightning can't do..." Except fly into electrical storms.
The new "Mako" missile is also amazing full hypersonic speed and can fit in an F-35/F-22. Inboard the F-35 can now carry 6 Air to Air missiles due to block 4 upgrade.
It unlikely that Mako will be accepted into service the USAF and USN most likely want to wait for the HACM and HALO.
You should react to Sandboxx. He has all kinds of military aircraft content. Awsome videos. 💪🏻👍🏻
The B2 spirit CAN make you a cup of tea
It can relive your desire for tea.
(1:55) No because it's American.
It will make you a cup of coffee though.😄
F-16 Fighting Falcons in a few NATO countries on American bases could carry one nuke on its belly. Americas way back decades around the SALT( strategic arms limitation treaty) which could come visit American and Soviet bases ar random and count how many nuke carrying bombers each other had. Meanwhile the F-16s would sit out openly and there was nothing that let you know that this one plane could make most of an individual city go "bye-bye". Turkey was the most notorious of this. Later Turkey was given info that they had American nukes on their soil .Those "shiny" projectiles were the ones. Pilots' and mechanics' families had their, I do believe it was 30 minute drills ,may have been an hour drill. Quick pack and hop on board a flight away from the Turkish/American base because it wouldn't be there in between an hour or two after the F-16s took off. Interesting right.
We just had an air show here in town and I thought of you 😂❤
“Can it make you a cup of tea?”
Probably can… sure not as an intended purpose, but I’m sure you could brew a cup of tea with an F-35
amazing video, and your SO CLOSE TO 500k hope you reach it soon man!!.
well modern warships needs an update
The tea making capability is a 2.5 billion dollar add on but it does have that feature.
Yes, it can make a cup of tea using a titanium kettle but that is a $13.7M option.
Again, I really recommend millennium 7’s videos about the f35 . Those are so good.
You lads have the f35, too. 💪
And that's the plan the f35 would fly close and designate targets while the regular fighters carry and fire missiles from safety that's guided in by the f35. That's why networking is so important now.
Royal marine Please react to the (paramedic force 5 bridge creek and moore, Oklahoma tornado May 3 1999). It's the first responders response to the 1999 moore, Oklahoma F5 tornando. I currently work as an EMT with EMSA in tulsa, Oklahoma. We use this video for training new hires on mass casualty response. The camera crews riding with these ambulance crews were making a Tv show on the day and life of first responders the day moore got hit. Most people have no idea what happen in the aftermath of a tornado. This video is a great watch to understand what it takes to triage a mass casualty incident.
B1-B bomber or the B-one is unable to carry nukes due to a treaty. Something about being able to fly a bomber a supersonic speeds wtih a nuke. Yet, then we have these fighter jets capable of the same thing as the B1-B could be capable of...
I'd be curious if they'd put a nuke on the Rapid Dragon platform as well.🤔
Yes, I have seen the new 6th generation. It’s definitely alien technology
It remains to be seen if Finland get authorisation for this too..
Finland stated when they joined that they were interested in the NATO partner nuclear sharing program, if only to make Russia second guess starting another Winter War.
we had decent relationship with russia but they effed it totally.. lets see what happens in future@@colbunkmust
Ehh what people don’t talk about. But isn’t classified all of our nukes minus a few. Are selectable yeild, uk to 1.5 megatons. And some up to 3 Mt, as only a few convinces of hydrogen control the power. It can be vented, very easily before detonation, also very quickly, depended on need. Almmof the US’s warheads. Short of one or two. Are scalable, up to 3 Mt warheads, in the same size and weight. Short of a few ounces of hydrogen. But the most common is 1.5 Mt, which is stupid, will gut any city ever made.
Ace combat 7 you can fly the F35. Also try Ace Combat: Assault Horizon
1st 😂😂
Great video , hope all good with the little one. ❤
They used to take the wings off an F-117 stealth fighter with a nuke inside, jam it into a cargo plane and it could land on almost any runway or road on earth! Take it out, wings back on. This terrified the Russians to no end as these "pop-up nuclear sites" would be impossible to find and stop. Imagine an F-117 taking off a small rural road in Bosnia at night headed for.....
Congratulations on 498k subs its gone up since I last seen soon be the big 500k
2:01 not with that attitude
I live in the Netherlands I don’t tink that the milletary has f35a’s that ar aloud to carry nuke’s
Love watching your channel. You seem like a really good dude and I thank you for your service to both here in the US and the UK. When you serve in Militaries of our 2 countries, you're actually serving the world for the common good. That sacrifice speaks volumes about you as a human being. Thank you for that. Now keep the fuckin videos coming daily, bro. Lol.
Hmmmmmmm... So Finland will be a nuclear superpower soon? I dunno if I should feel safer or less so... 😅
NGAD and Loyalwingman will be about 5 years before we see them. Unless something happens politically to fast track them. US does not see a threat large enough to require them right now. We literally have a "playbook" that list which decade specific technologies need to be perfected by to keep the ALREADY planned future weapons completion dates.........for the next 50 yers.
Hey there, first time commenting on one of your videos.
Dunno if it was mentioned in the video or not, but the F-35 is not yet capable of carrying actual nuclear weapons, as that is a very complex system that has to be added onto the aircraft.
It can carry weapons that are the size and weight of the B61 thermonuclear gravity bomb, or a training dummy of a B61, but not a live B61 as it doesn't have the authentication and arming systems that are needed in order to be able to actually perform a nuclear strike.
The decision to make it nuclear-capable has been made, that's true, and the systems I've mentioned will in fact be introduced as part of the wide range of upgrades that are getting rolled out in the upcoming Block-4 F-35's.
It's possible that older Block 3 and 2 F-35's might get similar upgrades further down the line, but right now it's only planned for the Block 4.
Also, it's become a bit of a personal pet peeve of mine, hearing people criticizing the F-35 program for ballooning costs, or that the aircraft was a waste, or that it doesn't work...it's a load of shite with a side of bull that's being pushed by dumb or ignorant people that want to sound smart, journalists who just have to shit out as many articles as they can to get revenue from clicks, or people with ulterior motives like the douchebag Pierre Sprey and the rest of the "Airforce Mafia".
I would recommend looking up LazerPig's video on the F-35: ruclips.net/video/CH8o9DIIXqI/видео.html
Thank you for your service! o7
NGAD. Next Generation Air Dominance Fighter. A 6th Gen fighter capable of both unmanned and manned combat. Estimated to cost 300 million. For example, the F-35A is 80 million. However NGAD is leagues ahead of the F-35. I believe it’s supposed to enter service around the late 2030’s. F/A-XX is the navy’s version of NGAD.
This makes a "accidental" nuke on the battlefield grow exponentially. To me it also puts a large emphasis on the shoot down of these aircraft by adversaries to gain a unexploded nuke from the wreckage before the missle can arm its nuclear payload for explosion or a hostile takeover of the air facility by hostile forces to gain the armaments themselves. They probably have contingencies for all these scenarios, but, the only winning move is not to play in the ballpark to begin with.
It's not the explosion that causes the most damage but the fires started from the thermal output that goes out so much further that blast maps tell you about
*At that point use another vehicle, another aircraft..." That's why we have the 35, it is the other aircraft. The 22 is the steath option. 13:02
A single F35 without wing loaded bombs acts as a stealth scout ahead of the bomb trucks and directs them to targets before the enemy can detect the "trucks".
Given that F-35 can use swarms, it can just hang around and pilot extremely stealthy swarms of drones that can do pretty much anything any pilot could want it to do, also it extends F-35's eyes on the skies quite a bit.
Hey Luke, not sure if you've messed with VR yet, but if you have a headset and wanna try something fun, check out VTOL VR. I'm a former American Marine and its such a blast. Not quite a full Flight Sim but more realistic then Ace Combat (which is still a great game). You get several options of aircraft. They are all fictional because of copyright reasons but you can tell they are all based on real aircraft. These include an Osprey, F-35, F-22, Eurofighter type thing, an F-14 if it the F-14 was built with today's tech (Electronic Warfare), and for funzies an Apache Attack Helo. The later supports a buddy in the front seat operating weapons and you in the back flying. Check it out my brotha. Im a former american Marine and I approve this message.
should fact check every single thing said in these military channels videos....
Tea..if you ask nicely. If they are worried about radar and stealth you could just fly upside down lol. Makes me wonder why missiles are all on the underside. Put them all on the top of the wings and body and ground radar will still bounce off the smooth underside :P
Mate, If you're interested in the "next" aircraft the closest thing is TEMPEST or the F/A XX program there is also the B-21 Raider, to my knowledge though there is no 7th gen programs yet publicly known about.
It can now do something the Panavia Tornado could do four decades ago! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
You will want to check out DCS: Digital Combat Simulator.
You have to buy the airframes, and download mods for things like the f22, but you can fly it there, and, as far as I know... You don't have a grind to fly what you want. Just buy and go.
nuclear warheads have come a long way from the early days where one weak bomb took up a whole plane, back in the 70s, they used to have a nuclear artillery shell, and it used to be a semiregular occurence for troops to train carrying a warhead, and parachute into "enemy" territory
You have to remember that the F-35's heavy loaded capabilities aren't necessarily aimed at the USAF. The USN and USMC have planned to heavily rely on F-35s in the future when the F/A-18s and Harriers are fully phased out, and there are a number of other nations whose only fixed wing attack aircraft are, or are planned to be only F-35, like Norway, Netherlands, Singapore, etc..
Tea is for women. Now if the F-35 can make COFFEE...now we're talkin.
As you say if you see it on youtube its old new stuff wont be seen until it too is old
The new weapon can literally hook up to any US air craft with the correct hookups and beings that 90 percent of the US planes use those hook ups I think even the a 10 warthog has the same hookups
Not sure if it can carry the MOAB but that is one massive bomb. There are some which are so large they cannot be delivered by a traditional bomber and need to be dropped from cargo aircraft.
As for the Lrasm look up the rapid dragon program
Well, if the F35 defeated everyone in the "war games", then of course this is the best aircraft! LOL Tell me how this super duper jet will go through a layered modern air defense system. What is he like in aerial combat with other planes? A question! Yes, this is clearly a good modern fighter jet. But don't think that this is an invincible super weapon! Something can always go wrong.
Lol this isn't Russian planes lmfso
To be honest it might be able to make a cup of tea. There is an approved electric kettle for US aircraft, the question would be does it have any accessory power that kettle could access.
We just had a successful AI F-16 fighting real pilots. It went very well.
Could the reasoning behind using the f35 in beast mode rather than, say an f15, be that even with all the avionics, targeting, networking, etc upgrades that they are doing to the legacy aircraft, the f35 is just more advanced and capable in those areas? Over and above is stealth capabilities, it is a monstrously powerful super computer too...
It’ll make you lose that cup of tea you drank earlier in the day lol
I love how you note how good the US Military News channel is and then get frustrated when they completely lose focus in the middle of the video and start quoting random nonsense. Just like they do in 90% of their other videos!
Hey buddy you should check out the hypersonic missile that can be carried in the internal weapon's bay of the F-35 A and F-22's!! 😊 It's a really advanced missile by Lockeed Martin
its a nice looking plane indeed, but still the delays and the fact that 29% of their fleet is fully mission capable and the block 4 upgrade gets delayed and delayed is kinda sad
Those are cool and all but the B-21 raider is starting to look like the real power house with some of the capabilities being eluded to.
Please react to more scp task forces🙏🙏🙏
Doesn’t the F-35 have a “swarm” type feature with having one pilot aircraft and a small group of AI controlled F-35s that operate on info from the main F-35?
It is planned upgrade to it but it is capable of using swarms.
It can make a country into a giant cup of tea.
Love these videos but look at the latest congressional hearings. Only 1/3 of F-35’s are airworthy. That’s terrifying.
It basically makes a stealth nuke until the very last moment when it would be to late to stop it
It can't make tea but it can put it in the harbor...again..
Give us some time and you might see shoulder fired nukes lol
Ace. Combat is really neat and nice you'll love it trust me
If you think that looks good, go look at the YF-23
You know if you were to put a pot of water with tea leaves on the back of the F35 shortly after it landed it probably could make a pot of tea 😅
Can't make a cup of tea, but it can now smoke more bad guys than Snoop Dogg smokes blunts now. 😂
If you want to see another good movie about the making of the atomic bomb, go watch Fat Man & Little Boy (1989). It too had an all-star cast (Paul Newman, John Cusack, Laura Dern, Bonnie Bedelia, John C. McGinley).😉 Peace🕊
Whars exacly the point of freefall nukes ? Any enemy worth nuking would have enogh airdefence defence worth using standoff nukes agist. A glide kit for the bomb or a nuke cruise missle fiting its weapon bay would make more sense.
You see…that’s where the stealth comes into play.
Air defenses cant fire on and destroy what they cant see.
my video wouldn’t load at first and it looked like OriginalHuman was looking straight into my eyes 😏😂
There used to be tactical nuclear artillery...no longer in service though.
They carry the new super sonic missiles internally too. 10 times the speed of sound?
Did you find a video of the new Turkish Fighter jet to react to?
REMEMBER: This is ONLY what we know about as far as capability, what has been released by the US military. What have they NOT told us about?
Finnish HX program opened this veil a bit, not much but a bit. Turns out F-35 has 47/1 KD ratio against other Western jets (F-22 not included) 😃This was in preset area, guess what it can do without restrictions.
If it could make tea... it would make tea while dogging missiles, and it would taste great while viewing your newly created mushroom cloud.
It can make u a cup of tea, but finnish models have a coffee maker installed in them :D
little Cesnas can carry them too😃
It may not make you a cup of tea, but with its nuclear capability it can certainly warm yours up!
If I had to guess theyre using DCS as a reference? Im not sure. Definitely not ARMA thats for sure
I'm sure it can carry the TBPS Bomb....
Tactical Peanut Butter Sandwich Bomb.
OH MY DAYS !!! 😂
It can make you INTO a cup of tea. Does that count?