RAID 5 Video Editing | HighPoint RocketStor 6114V

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
  • In this video I talk about various hard drive RAID setups, including my RAID 5 4-drive external bay, the usb 3.1 gen 2 HighPoint RocketStor 6114V. But the question is, is it worth it to use RAID for video editing in terms of performance? I'll show you results from other RAID and non-RAID setups to try an answer this question.
    I'll also talk about various RAID setups including RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, RAID 10, and RAID 50+.
    Amazon Links:
    RocketStor 6114V: amzn.to/2HWnOnm
    MediaSonic JBOD: amzn.to/2jzt95p
    MediaSonic RAID 50+: amzn.to/2wf3NCQ
    Samsung 960 EVO: amzn.to/2KH5DQq
    NAS HDD: amzn.to/2rq9zMr
    If you want to learn more about this and other episodes, read my blog @
    www.filmin5d.com
    Or if you have a question either leave a comment below or hit me up on twitter @
    / filmin5d
    Subscribe to my channel
    bit.ly/2dYrDGy
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 24

  • @FilmIn5D
    @FilmIn5D  6 лет назад +2

    Any of you using RAID 5 for media files while video editing? If not, let me know you solution here. Thanks for watching!

  • @leadsled8961
    @leadsled8961 3 года назад +1

    You need RAID for everything.

  • @WarriorsPhoto
    @WarriorsPhoto 5 лет назад +1

    Good video. This isn't what I am looking for at this time. But, maybe down the road as a backup solution.

  • @dogman2387
    @dogman2387 5 лет назад +1

    Great overview. Note: USB-C is NOT a new protocol. It's just a new connector. From Wikipedia: "A device with a Type-C connector does not necessarily implement USB 3.1". So I suspect you're running USB 2 or USB 3.0 on your USB-C connector.

  • @jelmerd3867
    @jelmerd3867 3 года назад

    Did you try the 6124V yet? From what I read on their website it should be faster and more quiet.

    • @FilmIn5D
      @FilmIn5D  3 года назад

      Oh nice, no I haven’t. I’ve switched to QNAP NAS drives which have much more capacity and are about 3x as fast as a 4-bay raid

  • @WhoDeanyUnchained
    @WhoDeanyUnchained 3 года назад

    I had to return this because the fan was too noisy. Which is a shame since it was very fast!

    • @FilmIn5D
      @FilmIn5D  3 года назад

      Yes, you can lower it in the software but it still gets loud when in use. My QNAP is MUCH quieter

  • @animusvisual
    @animusvisual 4 года назад

    Thank you for this video. I bought one before seeing this and i actually have raid 10. its super slow even on usb c. guess im gonna try to rebuild it as a 5. also i guess ill change from usb c to usb 3.1 to see if it helps speeds.

  • @NewWave.
    @NewWave. 3 года назад

    Great, video and breakdown - what are the fans like on the RocketStore 6114V? Are they noisy?

    • @FilmIn5D
      @FilmIn5D  3 года назад

      They are indeed pretty noisy, and unlike the QNAP that I have since upgraded to, i don’t think you can put it in silent mode

    • @NewWave.
      @NewWave. 3 года назад

      @@FilmIn5D What QNAP did you upgrade to and is that silent?

    • @FilmIn5D
      @FilmIn5D  3 года назад

      @@NewWave. I have the TVs-1282T3, but that one is rather large and has 12 bays for hard drives/SSDs, they have cheaper ones that are 4/8 bay, but if you get them you’ll need either a 10gb Ethernet card or thunderbolt 3 compatibility. It is very quiet tho in idle.

  • @ivanalonso8012
    @ivanalonso8012 5 лет назад

    USB C or USB 3.1?? Confusing topic. There's no way to compare it because they refer to different things. USB C is a connector, like TRS, RCA, VGA.... or USB. The shape is different and usually, the function is also different. There's one exception: the same shape of a USB connector can works in different ways: charging or transferring data. Even if we focus only on transfer we have been using this same connector for a long time: Since then we have been using USB type 1(12Mb), type 2(480Mb) and Type 3 (5Gb).... why? each type became faster due to a new protocol, with the same connector. mmmmm.... ok, USB 3 Is blue!.... but that's all.... not really! The new thing (2013) is that they decided to change the name to 3.1 gen 1 (5Gb/s) and create a new 3.1 gen 2 (10 Gb/s). I think this last protocol can use only the new connector Type C. Confusing?? Yes: There are tones of peripherals in online stores selling systems with USB 3.1Type C with only 5Gb/s (They usually omit if it's gen1 or 2)
    Interesting video, thanks. I'm also looking for a 'cheap' RAID array type 5 based on USB 3.1 Gen2 for my video workflow on 4K RAW... or wait for USB 3.2 Type C (20Gb/s) in 2019. Greetings!

  • @JonoLeGrice
    @JonoLeGrice 6 лет назад +1

    This is by far the best review I've seen on youtube, have been trying to find a solution for ever!! Quick question.. would you say it's a bad idea to only have 3 drives in a 4 bay enclosure?

    • @FilmIn5D
      @FilmIn5D  6 лет назад

      Thanks for the comment. So you can absolutely use 3 drives instead of 4, if for some reason you only have access to 3 drives... The catch is that, and also the reason that 4 is more common than 3; with an array of 3 you can only have 1 drive fail (33%) and with 4 you also can have 1 drive failure (25%). This is also the same with capacity (4 1TB HDs = 3TB RAID 5 whereas 3 1TB HDs = 2TB RAID). TLDR: 4 is more efficient, safer, and possibly faster than 3, but also more expensive so if 3 is your only option then go for it. Hope that helps!

    • @JonoLeGrice
      @JonoLeGrice 6 лет назад

      Yep this again was very helpful haha, thank you! Just one quicky, is it fine to mix drive sizes... i.e. 3x6tb + 1x8tb in a RAID?

    • @FilmIn5D
      @FilmIn5D  6 лет назад +1

      no I would not mix drive sizes, but sometimes on a rebuild (replacing a broken drive) you may be better off plugging in a slightly larger drive than the original just to make sure there's enough headroom

    • @JonoLeGrice
      @JonoLeGrice 6 лет назад

      Ok aweome, thanks for all that!

    • @yupan9089
      @yupan9089 5 лет назад

      @@FilmIn5D 4 drives is not safer than 3. More drives in a RAID5 array (or any other RAID-level except RAID1) means higher chance of complete data loss, because there is a higher chance of a 2nd drive failing before finishing rebuild. Similarly, the overall risk is also higher with larger capacity drives due to increased rebuild time.

  • @jessecallahan480
    @jessecallahan480 5 лет назад

    Good info thanks. What kind of drives are you using in your RocketStor 6114V RAID box?

  • @juliasmith5267
    @juliasmith5267 6 лет назад

    great. :D