Solid video. Its also worth mentioning even if your FF camera offers a *true* OG mode, the native aspect plays a pivot role in post conforming. For instance, if you pair a 3:2 sensor in a true OG mode with a 2X scope, and conforming that image to a 2.39:1 canvas, you're disposing a whopping 20% of your capture resolution / FOV on each side of the frame to fill your standard cinema scope project. This is why its important to select stretch factors that pair to your native aspect sensor. A 1.5X or 1.6X for a 3:2 sensor would be ideal, where as a 1.8X or 2X would be ideal with a 4:3 shaped sensor to minimize cropping.
Spot on. Ideally you want 6:5 for zero crop on 2x if you want 2.39:1 delivery. Of the lower cost cameras that can do that, there's the BM Pyxis, 6k Cinema I think, and definitely the Z Cam F6 - which can do it in full sensor and 4k crop. Maybe there are others, probably the Kinefinities. Or just get an Arri Mini LF 😅 PS even with the the Remus if you use Open Gate 6k, you only have to zoom in around 6% for full coverage on 2.39:1, so you can get quite a different fov with no quality loss if exporting in 4k.
So what you’re saying is… if I want to shoot open gate and s35 on a V-Raptor I need both?!? 😭 I am leaning more towards Remus so I am not locked into shooting 8K Open Gate. I would love to see some comparison of Remus vs Cato at open gate. I haven’t found a review out there that shows just that.
@JasonLeeCalifornia ah no, if I understand your question. For 2x open gate is preferable as you have more height. If you don't have open gate like my Canon cameras then 1.5x is better.
Solid video. Its also worth mentioning even if your FF camera offers a *true* OG mode, the native aspect plays a pivot role in post conforming. For instance, if you pair a 3:2 sensor in a true OG mode with a 2X scope, and conforming that image to a 2.39:1 canvas, you're disposing a whopping 20% of your capture resolution / FOV on each side of the frame to fill your standard cinema scope project.
This is why its important to select stretch factors that pair to your native aspect sensor. A 1.5X or 1.6X for a 3:2 sensor would be ideal, where as a 1.8X or 2X would be ideal with a 4:3 shaped sensor to minimize cropping.
@@capionstudio some good points 👉 there!
Just the video I was looking for, I am leaning towards Remus.
@@11.Pierre glad I could help.
Spot on. Ideally you want 6:5 for zero crop on 2x if you want 2.39:1 delivery. Of the lower cost cameras that can do that, there's the BM Pyxis, 6k Cinema I think, and definitely the Z Cam F6 - which can do it in full sensor and 4k crop. Maybe there are others, probably the Kinefinities. Or just get an Arri Mini LF 😅
PS even with the the Remus if you use Open Gate 6k, you only have to zoom in around 6% for full coverage on 2.39:1, so you can get quite a different fov with no quality loss if exporting in 4k.
@@alzibaba thanks for the clarification 👍
So what you’re saying is… if I want to shoot open gate and s35 on a V-Raptor I need both?!? 😭 I am leaning more towards Remus so I am not locked into shooting 8K Open Gate. I would love to see some comparison of Remus vs Cato at open gate. I haven’t found a review out there that shows just that.
@JasonLeeCalifornia ah no, if I understand your question. For 2x open gate is preferable as you have more height. If you don't have open gate like my Canon cameras then 1.5x is better.
Yes.
The only correct answer is 'yes'😂😂😂
@@AfoteyAnnum of course! Lol
@@waynosfotoscameras