The fact that Kirby clinically died, too literally makes Jill, and Charlie the first, and only ghost faces to kill the whole new cast group lol. The cops, and Sidney's publicist even died.
Remember: Jill planned everything perfectly. She says it herself "Oh yeah... We're perfect". They killed the entire cast, and this new movie killed 6 extras and random people who had nothing to do with Sam/Tara out of 10 Ghostface victims... How pathetic is that?
As if a movie studio ever cared about what Sidney ever wanted or about her safety. They planned to make a movie out of her horrific experience after the events of the first Scream for cash grab. Even so, regardless of how bad it was, Jill and Charlie themselves made videos of their murders and posted it online in real time, revealed by Jill herself in the end, which is something that - although simingly impossible given the year when Scream 4 takes place - holds the idea that these murders were not forgotten, and very unlikely to ever be erased from the internet.
@@v2productions936 Yes but I watcwhd scream 4 yesterday and its said that the first 3 stab movies were about sidney prescott but since then sidney threatened to sue them if they ever make stab movies with her in it where the part Marnie Cooper says in scream 5 its time travel
@@avaavocado8840 Yeah, but in Scream 5 the movie explicity says that Sidney's character was in every movie of the franchise. Meaning even the fifth Stab movie with Time Travel had, somehow, Sidney's Prescott Character in the movie.
@@v2productions936yes however if they actually used her experiences she could sue. The events of scream 4 were never made into a stab movie. That’s essentially what Jill wanted ( minus the dying).
literally when i first saw scream 5 i was like “isn’t their motive literally just scream 4 all over again?” granted it was for different reasons but they’re otherwise the exact same
@@madet3096 Roman LMAO. Worst gf ever. You can't be serious. Forced retcon, god awful motive and also doesn't make any sense, magic voice changer, teleporting crap, boring calls, boring character before reveal, lame kills, not intimidating at all, overall whiny bitch while movie tries to tell you otherwise, no interactions with Sidney, shocking reveal in the bad way and this list can go forever
Scream 4 is the best sequel,and Jill Roberts is the best killer in the franchise!!!MAYBE she didn't kill many people,but the kill count doesn't really matter,she SLAYED either way.
Nope, she has no killing skills and she only wanted fame which is dumb whereas Amber killed DEWEY and was influenced by Richie (she was the main killer) and almost killed Sidney and gale
Richie is a horror fan so I don’t think thought the rest of the movies were trash. And supposedly Amber just wanted to be “ apart of something. ” Probably proving that Richie gaslighted and manipulated her into it.
I love scream movies and just seen 6 last night. Definitely my third favorite. I’d say Scream 3 still hold number in my heart though. It’s just something about it I love. I think Roman was one of the best ghost faces. And to find out he the reason scream 1 basically started is also a fun fact for me.
I love Roman's reveal and how he and Sidney acts both like siblings fighting each other for stupid reasons, even though Roman was abandoned by his own mother and all he wanted was to be loved and praised by others like Sidney did, and he was almost getting all of that had he just made the stupid Stab 3 movie. Also, he had the biggest balls. Dude killed 9 people on his own, 10 if we ever consider Maureen Prescott as he claimed he was there when she was killed. I mean, I find it hard they'll ever make a single Ghostface Killer for a movie ever again...
@@v2productions936 this! And the one girl who was supposed to play Sidney in stab 3 was suppose to be an accomplice but I guess they threw that script away
Oh shut the fuck up. No one believed in that. And for what? For a shitty Star Wars director who couldn't had the balls to take the criticism of his horrible job just because he is white, rich and clearly untalented. They had the same excuse and mentioned him again in Scream 6 and that movie barely had any meta reference. What is the so called "resolution revolving around the current time" for Scream 6? Also, don't think that Matt and Tyler's pathetic attempt of directing the new Scream Movies makes them as good or talented as Wes Craven's geniusness. They payed for the rights of the franchise, great deal, anyone with money could do that. But whatever other director and team of screenwritters could had done a much better job. Take Aaron Martin for instance who has made 5 seasons of a Slasher far more interesting then the two Scream Movies made by these two.
@@v2productions936the Star Wars director fiasco is the reason they made him the director of Stab 8. That is precisely the criticism behind it. Despite being a weaker motive compared to previous films, toxic fandom is very relevant, as I previously mentioned. People but Sam portrayal under the mud (I was one of those people) and a lot of her lines on Scream 6 were a response to that backlash. About Slasher, I’ve only been able to watch the first 2 seasons and I enjoyed them a lot.
v2produtions936 I mean that is true they couldn’t even kill chad, mindy, Sam or Tara and they continued on to scream six that’s practically the first movie in the scream franchise for any of the friends from the friend group survives besides Sidney or randy
Yes she was so the main that she is just as forgettable in Scream 6 as Charlie and Mickey are in their respective movies. But sure she was the main. In your dreams, of course.
Amber is the main though, Richie got like one kill if that, Amber killed Dewey, Wes and probably Judy, the security guard at the hospital, Liv, plus more ppl im probably forgetting
That doesn't mean she is the main killer. The main killer never kills the most. The main killer lets the secondary killer do more kills because the police will always have more evidence against them. Stu, Mickey, Charlie, Kieran and Jay also killed the most and they are not the main killers regardless.
Even VI admits she’s the main killer, she came up for one last scare, main killers do that, not sub killers. Main killers are also the big shock reveal. Richie’s was just a ‘oh so their doing the evil bf thing again’ So all of the main killers go like this Billy Miss Loomis Roman Jill Amber Bailey
@@eclipez5653 Scream 6 focus on Richie, not Amber. So what she came for a last scare? Mickey also did and he wasn't the main killer. And the so called 'big shock reveal' is not what makes them main killers. Plotwise, it also makes no sense for Amber to be the main, given how pathetically manipulated and groomed she was by Richie. LAst but not least, in Scream 6's killer wall with all the killers from the movies, Richie is the one even with the bigger photo compared to Amber's, just like Billy has the bigger photo compared to Stu's. And in the Scream 5 poster, Richie also occupies more space than Amber, just like Bailey occupies more space in Scream 6's poster, compared to his two kids.
@@eclipez5653 I'm not saying this, for instance, because I like/care more about Richie. He certainly was a terrible main killer, and a very boring character at that. But it is undeniable that he was the main one, just like his father was. Next killer in Scream 7 will probably be Richie's mother or Bailey's father...
I get that she WAS groomed by him, but she also manipulated him. Radio silence has said that ‘Richie thinks he’s the main man, but really it’s Amber pulling the string’
@@olusko7541 "Her own cast" means she couldn't kill the teens, whereas Jill and Charlie literally killed the entire Teen cast in their movie, let alone a bunch of adults too. Also, Dewey's death was pathetic and poorly written.
@@olusko7541 Who cares? She was not main, like I said, and the entire next entry is about Richie. Every secondary killer has more kills, just like I've already explained in previous comments.
Jill: So, let me get this straight? I had a CLEAR GOAL of becoming famous, and y’all are telling me that you both killed people because you *didn’t like a movie?* I’m sorry, that’s pretty pathetic. Funny, but pathetic Richie and Amber: NO!! It was NOT just a movie! It was Stab 8! And it PISSED ON OUR CHILDHOODS! So, our movie was gonna be so much better than Rian Johnson’s! We’re the true fans! Jill: LOL, this is getting ridiculous Charlie: Well, I kind of get them Jill: Shut up, Charlie. No one cares about you Billy: Ooh, y’all are so dead to me. Y’all stay away from my daughter😡 Mrs. Loomis: My adorable son is right, you did NOT have to go after my ADORABLE granddaughter like that! Billy: Mom, YOU abandoned me in the first place, which is why Stu and I became who we were. And then suddenly after I was killed, you cared?! Mrs. Loomis: I’m so sorry son!😭😭I’m trying to do better! Billy: It’s okay, Mom. But it’s not about us right now, it’s about how these two new morons tried to kill my adorable little girl! Over a stupid movie made about my life story! Richie and Amber: *IT IS NOT JUST A MOVIE!!!!* Stu: LOL, I am loving this so much!🤪🤪 Mickey: Yeah, this showdown is going to *ROCK!* Roman: My God, what have I done? I started this whole thing🤦♂️🤦♂️
Who cares? She didn't even came close to achieve her pathetic nonsense goal, whereas Jill not only managed to achieve hers before she died, she also managed to make the so called movie that no one will ever heard about comming from pathetic Richie and Amber. Richie and Amber, doing all of that for a shitty movie sequel no one will ever heard about. Jill, making the damn sequel exist by itself and be seen as the final girl she always dreamed to be once.
@@huntergosselin4975 Right! Sidney was not killed by a gunshot in the head solely because, had she done that, none of these Amber Fans would have liked it, and they'd be crying out loud up to this day that someone killed the main protagonist. Also, Sidney is clearly protected by Plot Armor, so these pathetics excusés are a waste of time...
Sorry to inform you this, but she wasn't. Aside from Billy, every Main Killer was revealed after the Side Killer. Not to mention how both Billy and Stu revealed themselves pretty much together at the same time, while Richie tried hard to pretend he was impressed/scared of Amber after she shot Liv.
@@randomguy1964 That is exactly why she wasn't either mastermind nor main killer. Both Stu, Mickey and Charlie have also killed the most in each of their respective movies, and they were not main killers exactly because of that, since the Main Killer of each movie (Billy, Mrs. Loomis and Jill) would eventually betray their partner in the end, either in case they got caught by the police so they'd sell out their partner so they could be seen as sole survivors or because they would just simply think their partner was disposable.
@@randomguy1964 Also, the same happens to the TV series. Piper was the main killer and died first, while Kieran was supposed to reveal himself afterwards but he didn't. He eventually outnumbered Piper's kill with all of his victims from Season 2, but he was still not the main killer since the whole show was surrounded by Brandon James and Piper was his daughter. And, in Season 3 (Scream Resurrection), Beth was the Main Killer and she did not kill most of the victims, and she also betrayed her partner Jay who had killed the most to prove her his loyalty and service. That is exactly why Amber was neither mastermind nor main killer.
@@randomguy1964 But it's completely understandable why people would mix them and think Amber was the main killer, since this new movie didn't make any of it's killers have a personal motive to go on a killing spree.
@@nateblanch5045 She did had a motive which was a great prediction of how the Gen Y generation reacts towards fame and what they are willing to do to achieve it.
@@v2productions936 yeah I never thought of it that way scream 4 is my favorite I just don't like Jill's motive I mean it's alright I have seen better tho
@@nateblanch5045 I mean, it's better than this new movie where the motive is a revenge plot for a character in 5 and Scream 6 didn't ever tried to explain the plothole in the movie - it just sortta "happened to them". Even Mrs. Loomis motive was a revenge, but she had consistancy and she created an actual plan: Pay a killer, put the blame on him, make him kill most if not all the victims while she'd just help him with phone calls and telling him orders, create a fake name, etc (Jesus, Scream 6 says her first name is Nancy when Nancy was a fake name so she could pass on as a reporter at the college).
@@LanaDelReySupremacy No, this was not confirmed by the director. She was the side Killer, Richie is the main one. Both of the killers didn't have any personal motive, they were both movie fans. Richie was the second one to be revealed, and he was the one crying his motives and telling Amber what to do, given how he ordered her to go search for Tara.
@@v2productions936 you’re confusing richie with charlie. Secondly. richie was the Mastermind behind it but not the Main killer. It’s in the name “KILLER”
So did Stu, Mickey, Charlie, Kieran and Jay and they were all secondary killers. That does not mean Amber was the main killer, if anything it also helps to prove she was the secondary one. Also, watch this: ruclips.net/user/shortsOpNTzFdde-o
Both Jill and Charlie had 5 kills each, where Charlie killed 5 victims (Marnie, Jenny, Olivia, Rebecca and Robbie - Plus the attack on Kirby), and Jill killed 4 victims (Hoss, Perknis, Kate and Trevor) and Charlie. Either way, they killed their entire teen cast on the movie, differently from Scream 5 that killed 2 extras, 2 sides and a legacy, or the Scream 6 in which they killed literally just extras.
@@matcontentworld3165 Como que o Charlie matou Ross, Perkins e Kate se ele estava no Facadatona com o Robbie e, saindo de lá, ele foi direto pra casa da Kirby? A Kirby foi se encontrar com a Jill somente depois da Jill matar os 3, no qual o grupo dos jovens foram todos se juntar na Kirby. É impossível, e ainda mais iógico, dizer que a Jill e o Charlie trocaram de lugar (Jill esfaquear a Gale e Charlie matar os 3), porque cada um deles já estava ao lado das respectivas vítimas para os ataques. E mais, a Jill pegar a arma dos policiais com o Charlie não é um argumento plausível. Ela mesma poderia ter entregado a arma pra ele durante o momento que ambos saem da sala, justamente porque o Charlie estaria fantasiado de Ghostface, e usar a arma como último recurso para impedir quem tentasse fugir. E o mesmo momento da Jill passar a arma para o Charlie antes dele devolver a arma pra ela explicaria como a Jill sabia exatamente aonde a Gale foi atacada. Em 5s fora de cena eles poderiam fazer isso.
So before. I start good vid but amber will beat jill roberts but its very close and amber is the main killer watch the movie she almost killed the cast im not just saying but she actually is while riche kirsch was the one playing mind games and also amber and 6 kills while. Riche had like 1 also another thing scream 5 and 6 base off scream 1 and 2
Yeah, and so did Mickey who killed the most in Scream 2, but he was not the main killer. Mrs. Loomis was, because she hired him. Same deal with Richie, he manipulated Amber into committing the murders because she was gonna be blamed by the crimes. "Let the cops search for the possible second killer. Debbie Sault doesn't even exist...", well, what if most of the killers was committed by one person only (Amber), would anyone ever suspect she had a partner? Roman didn't had one...
Tbh I don’t hate the film but at the same time I dislike how they made it sound like the sequels inferior to the original *it was like the sequel didn’t matter or weren’t relevant to the first* *like I get most sequel/remakes films aren’t good as the original but at least they don’t erase the continuity or the plot of the original* This is why I have a soft spot for scream 4 because they explain that scream four was remake but they did not erase the continuity of the orginal But one thing that confuse me Is if scream 5 a sequel or a reboot because they’re not mentioning any character from other previous films but for some reason they mention Kirby as a Easter egg or proof that she is alive It’s either a reboot or sequel because you can’t have both because it’s too confusing to follow the timeline because you need to at least acknowledge the other character of the other films because the character Roman was technically the original killer because he orchestrated everything from the start But considering the plot of this movie was about the Franchise of in movie stab you think they’ve told the film in the style of the film wes craven did with nightmare on elm street. You know wes craven “new nightmare” Honsetly the only thing I’m looking forward of this films are the memes either making fun of this film or those incorrect quote thing people do on wattpad or tumblr *my favorite is when people do multiple reference on the park and reaction “who broke it” and “the codenames eagle one”
"I dislike how they made it sound like the sequels inferior to the original" That's the point. You said it all. "like I get most sequel/remakes films aren’t good as the original but at least they don’t erase the continuity or the plot of the original" Exactly, and that's exactly how Matt and Tyler had directed this 5th movie. They made it look like Roman (Scream 3) didn't matter nor had existed, that Jill and Charlie (Scream 4) didn't already do what Richie and Amber were trying to achieve and lots of other shitty comments just diminishing, shaming and belittling the other Scream sequels (Plus, Jill and Charlie had filmed and posted their kills online. It's on the internet. People still do have those videos saved somewhere, and Stab fans *knows* it was them who had made those videos and posted online)... "This is why I have a soft spot for scream 4 because they explain that scream four was remake but they did not erase the continuity of the orginal" nor they had taken continuity of the other sequels itself, or had criticized them. The movie itself had criticized the Remakes in the Movie Industry and History itself, it wasn't a hard punch tbt like Scream 5 did of some sarcastic evil note like "Look how damn bad I was in these old pics". "It’s either a reboot or sequel because you can’t have both because it’s too confusing to follow the timeline" They had created the term "requel" which isn't even a thing, hence why you're confused. Hence why the movie was shit. Because if requel were to be a thing, then *Scream 4 was already a requel 11 years ago - created by Wes Craven himself.*
It's such a shame I got a job after I made those videos, I was going to make other three more about exactly what you've pointed on your comment, but I couldn't manage to have time to make them... Soon, I'll be making more of these. I mean, sadly Scream 6 is comming and it's going to be even worse then 5 solely because it won't have Neve Campbell, so...
@@v2productions936 I actually heard that neve is coming back But on the subject of the word requel, i did look up the word and believe that there certain that work well being a requel and there some that don’t work well I don’t have anything against remakes but I just notice I started to dislike whenever they do remake of certain movie *coughing Disney live action remakes* And because of that, this cause Me to dislike remakes unless it done right Like they do everything to tell the plot in a new way but they change things that made most of us love the original. I don’t like how they put little effort on remakes to try to surpass the original or be as unique every time they have speaking dialogue in the new one, they always seem monotone and robotic. It like they either have no or show emotion telling us what they feeling *although there are a few remakes they did really well. Like 101 Dalmatian with glen close (God I love how fun she had to act like cruella), homeward bound the incredible journey, hairspray (this is the only because they manage to get John trovolta to dress as the mom and I love it), maleficent* And I can’t stand the new Star Wars movie because they made Rey too much of Mary Sue and was way too prefect in everything *there a reason why people gravitate toward leia and Luke because both were strong character who never back down in the presence of evil and the fact she was already a leader in the beginning of the fourth movie and the fact both finding out who their father were was the biggest plot twist of the movie then you see them doing it again in movie 9 and it’s like meh because you see them bring back palpatine and I’m like “why? And how?” Because they tell in the opening of movie 9 instead of the ending credits of movie 8. I hate how Disney made the book of stars wars legend not canon to the universe of star wars*
She killed 4 victims and planned everything. She literally wears the mask and do the unmask reveal. She filmed and posted the victims deaths online like a snuff film. She cheated on her partner and killed him. She had a personal motive and was not even related to revenge like the rest 90% of the killers in the entire franchise. She was the main killer in her movie. How the fuck would she not be considered as a Ghostface. If any of them was not the Ghostface was Ethan and pathetic fucking coward Richie.
I think other ghostface killers who are broken must be in heaven and the others are pure evil go to hell but charlie is influenced so I think he went to heaven
OH FUCK! The entire Kirsh family meeting each other in hell, wtf! At this point when Scream 7 releases, they'lll probably put Richie's mom as the main killer and the second killer will probably be Tara's father who wants to murder Sam and her mother for making him think he was Sam's dad all those years...
@@v2productions936 it was only based for Richie because his family was enraged he was killed 💀 Amber doing more doesn't prove anything about Richie being the main killer and makes me suspect Amber was the main.
@@owenjayes Again... Hence why she was the secondary one. Same way Mrs. Loomis is the main killer in S2, because she payed for Mickey to do mostly all the killings while she helped Mickey and ordered Mickey into what he had to do, so the police had more evidence against him, Mrs. Loomis was doing all of that to revenge Billy, the main killer in S1. If the entire Ghostface Reveal and motivation was to revenge Richie, he was the main killer in S5.
@@owenjayes Also, that's not the only proof there is: - Richie killed the least (As every Main Killer has always done in previous movies with Double Ghostface Killers); - Richie manipulated and groomed Amber into doing things for him. She was 16/17 while he was 25/26; - Richie was about to betray on Amber back in the hospital because he never tried to stop Dewey from shooting Amber - and Gale's phone call was not part of their plan, so had Amber got killed right then and there, Richie would still carry the plan to kill the rest of the characters himself and/or find another person to manipulate to help him - like every main killer was gonna betray their partners in previous movies (Billy, Mrs. Loomis and Jill); - Richie was ordering Amber in the final act; - Of all the killers, Richie is the main focus for S6 and most likely will have more connection related to him in S7; - His character is even the one that ocuppies more space in Posters for S5, while Amber didn't... It's too much proof in and out of the movie itself. You may like Amber more, like I prefer Stu more than Billy, but she was not the main killer.
@@v2productions936 Richie may be the main but Amber did more. And that hospital betrayal is nonsense. He literally tried to stop Dewey from shooting her in the head
tbh i think amber was the main killer she had the convos and set ups planned out along with having more kills and yall can debate she had less kills but she confirmed killed more important characters like dewey. yall cant be serious saying richies the main one
Killing more important characters does not mean she is the main killer. Killing more never meant once in the slasher genre that the character is the Main Killer (See Slasher Solstice, Scream Queens, Harper's Island, etc in which none of those the main killer aka the brain head of the crimes were the ones to kill more). You thinking Amber was the main killer is a very solid opinion in your brain dead world, but if a psycopath plans an entire murder spree, the idea of this killer just letting his evidence be all around the crime scene is stupid. They need someone to be at fault. And if not the main girl/protagonist, it needs to be their partner. But Richie's plan to blame Sam could not and would not ever worked out. Blamming Amber would be much easier, given how her evidence was always there. She was manipulated by an older men. He tried to put the blame on her once and almost let her die in the hospital scene. The directors did an interview in which they said *Richie did not want to dirty his hands,* not that he would never dirt his hands. Amber is the secondary killer (And that does not mean she is not better than Richie, because he sucks a lot).
Stab 8 is kinda like it. It obviously doesn't say their names nor follow Sidney's storyline again because she threatened the studios in case they ever used her name again and so on and so forth... But, if you think about it, Scream 4 was the only movie to have low Box Office with it's release, despite it's great story and characters. It was the only movie to be taken as "very bad" along with Scream 3. So yeah, it's too far off that they wrote Stab 8 t be the worst movie in the new trilogy, because Scream 4 was "the worst" movie for box office. Hence why I wrote that line for the video. Hence why they made an entire movie and killer motive for the killers based into making a new movie, a better one. One that wasn't a "bullshit, cash in, run in the mill" sequel...
@@matcontentworld3165 Scream 4 was critique to Remake Movies, but it was not an actual remake itself. They could had addressed it in Scream 5, but didn't, so the blame is on them. But more importantly, I don't think Wes Craven would ever reboot the movies/characters himself. They were too precious for him.
@@v2productions936 I Have Sure He Didnt Actually Remake It Jill And Charlie Wanted To Remake Stab 1 And Not Make An Sequence But Scream 4 Is An Actual Sequence
@@matcontentworld3165 Like I said, what the characters wanted in that movie *is* a critique to "Remake" itself. It's basically a middle finger to the hollywood industry back in the day of only making Movie Remakes. But Scream 4 wasn't a remake itself. Hence why Jill and Charlie's plan was not gonna work. Hence why they put a line in Sidney's character as *"Don't fuck with the original"* if you're going to do a remake, which is what they would mostly do, by breaking rules, changing characters and so on and so forth. But, in Scream 5, Richie wanted to make a sequel, but based within the origins of the story, bringing back legacy characters such as Sidney's character into the sequel they wanted Hollywood to make... This by itself is a remake, and not such a thing as """requel""" because """requel""" does not exist. Because you already have a "Remaster" which is when you just upgrade the same thing to better graphics, you have the "Remakes" which is when you bring the same content but with slightly different changes in it's mechanics and they are usually also upgraded to better graphics and they all still lead to the same story, arcs and conclusion and last but not least when you bring back a franchise that was considered "over" for 10 years (Which is not even true because we had the TV Series approved by Wes Craven himself before he passed away) and you try to force a continuation out of it, you're doing a *"Revival"* of the franchise, but not a """Requel""". Requel is a word created solely for that movie. Jurassic Park new movies are not "requels", they are Revivals. iCarly's new seasons are not "requels", they are revivals. Requel was a pile of garbage the directors created because they wanted to feel smart, but just couldn't. This, in itself, is fucking up the original. The fact that Neve Campbell was not gonna be well paid for Scream 6 is fucking up the original.
Neither did Billy, Mrs. Loomis, Jill, Piper and Beth from Scream franchise. The Main Killer is not the one who kills the most in Slashers. In the TV series Slasher Solstice (Season 3), the main killer is also the one who didn't kill the most. In Harper's Island is the same deal, the Main Killer was also the one who pulled down the strings and had planned everything. Richie manipulated, groomed and ordered Amber to do most of the stuff. He killed a cop and that was that. Regardless, he is the main killer.
I'd say, in order (For now): 1. Jill 2. Billy 3. Stu 4. Roman 5. Mrs. Loomis But I keep on changing my list because sometimes I keep asking myself how pathetic Billy is for doing what he did because his mother left him (and how it makes no sense for Sidney to be the one he wants to blame for), or how many kills each one of them had throught the franchise (For exemple, Mrs. Loomis killed the least in all of them, mostly because she payed Mickey to do the killings, and her plan was top notch very well constructed, I'd up her on the list), so for now that's how my list goes. If we ever consider the TV series killers, I'd say my top 5 is: 1. Jill 2. Billy 3. Piper 4. Stu 5. Beth
Amber was not the main killer. She was groomed by Richie, she killed most victims and did most of the attacks (meaning Richie had more evidence to pin her down as the only killer), she was pratically betrayed by Richie at the hospital (And every main killer betrays their partner, and Gale's phone call to Dewey wasn't in the killer's plan and Richie was willing to let Amber get shot in the head) and Richie was ordering her by the end of the movie.
NAH HOW COME JILL IS TALKING THAT MUCH SMACK EVEN THOUGH AMBER DID ALL THE KILLING AND JILL LET CHARLIE DO MOST OF IT!!! AND SHE CANT EVEN KILL SHERIFF JUUUUTTTYYYYY AnD AMBER KILLED SOMEONE SHE COULDNT AND SHE KILLED DEWEY SOMETHING JILL COULDNT DO HAHHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!
Amber did all the killing, no one is denying that. But she still was the secondary killer, the partner, the other one. The Main killer was Richie. And that doesn't mean I like Richie, but that's the undeniable truth, so deal with it.
@@tgabz Nope, not everybody is as sick of the head as you are, sorry. Most people have better taste in media then you could possibly ever comprehend. Plus, last time I checked, the Scream 5 movie has the same rating as Scream 4 on IMDb, proving how the so called "Success" from the movie was a huge facade.
“B****please you couldnt even kill your own cast” was the best line.
Lol😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
It had me dead💀
@@Crimson_123 gwen?!
Im dead i can't 😂😂😂😂
Omg I can’t with ambers facial expressions 😂 her lips and eyes
The fact that Kirby clinically died, too literally makes Jill, and Charlie the first, and only ghost faces to kill the whole new cast group lol. The cops, and Sidney's publicist even died.
Remember: Jill planned everything perfectly. She says it herself "Oh yeah... We're perfect". They killed the entire cast, and this new movie killed 6 extras and random people who had nothing to do with Sam/Tara out of 10 Ghostface victims... How pathetic is that?
Roman and Mickey/Nancy also did that
@@unclekarl5219Joel :
@@aandylollclearly not the main cast because by that you could say judy hicks
@@unclekarl5219idk if the ones I'm gonna say are important but Nancy and Mickey did not kill Louise and Murphy
They actually didn't make Scream 4 into a stab movie because Sydney would have sued the studio
As if a movie studio ever cared about what Sidney ever wanted or about her safety. They planned to make a movie out of her horrific experience after the events of the first Scream for cash grab. Even so, regardless of how bad it was, Jill and Charlie themselves made videos of their murders and posted it online in real time, revealed by Jill herself in the end, which is something that - although simingly impossible given the year when Scream 4 takes place - holds the idea that these murders were not forgotten, and very unlikely to ever be erased from the internet.
@@v2productions936 Yes but I watcwhd scream 4 yesterday and its said that the first 3 stab movies were about sidney prescott but since then sidney threatened to sue them if they ever make stab movies with her in it where the part Marnie Cooper says in scream 5 its time travel
@@avaavocado8840 Yeah, but in Scream 5 the movie explicity says that Sidney's character was in every movie of the franchise. Meaning even the fifth Stab movie with Time Travel had, somehow, Sidney's Prescott Character in the movie.
Also, Stab 8 was basically released a full decafe after Stab 7.
@@v2productions936yes however if they actually used her experiences she could sue. The events of scream 4 were never made into a stab movie. That’s essentially what Jill wanted ( minus the dying).
Beach please you couldn't even kill your own cast"This is the best line ever
U copied someone’s comment
Jill would obliterate them if they weren't already dead 😂
She certainly would hahahaha
Charlie in the background: DAMM
Omg Jill is so right, Hopefully Hell won’t be that bad for me, If I go there
If you go there, I'll be waiting for you
Don't worry about that, that's just religious crap that doesn't exist
Me too i promise ❤
@@v2productions936Can I join💀🔥
Burning isn't fun..
In the scream universe, They never made the Scream 4's events into film
Oop-NOW THATS HOW YOU CLEAR A BITC-
She ain't gonna top the brilliance of Jill Roberts.
Amber and her little knifey can screw each other.
Period
Same way Sydney cleared her
Both Richie and Amber is main killer in scream 5, They They work together and are both team masterminds.
Yeah, and Amber attacked the most people.
literally when i first saw scream 5 i was like “isn’t their motive literally just scream 4 all over again?” granted it was for different reasons but they’re otherwise the exact same
Gurl!! Right Jill would kill these 2 in one take 🙄🤦♂️ 5creaM erked the fuck out of me cus Amber was so fuckin weak yet she killed Dewey?!
Best Ghostface = Jill
Billy, Stu, Mickey, Roman and Wayne >
@@madet3096Billy and Roman, maybe, Stu, Mickey and Wayne? Absolutely not
@@Nononuah Jill feats are overratef
@@madet3096 Roman LMAO. Worst gf ever. You can't be serious.
Forced retcon, god awful motive and also doesn't make any sense, magic voice changer, teleporting crap, boring calls, boring character before reveal, lame kills, not intimidating at all, overall whiny bitch while movie tries to tell you otherwise, no interactions with Sidney, shocking reveal in the bad way and this list can go forever
The fact that Billy did better than all of them
Scream 4 is the best sequel,and Jill Roberts is the best killer in the franchise!!!MAYBE she didn't kill many people,but the kill count doesn't really matter,she SLAYED either way.
Nope, she has no killing skills and she only wanted fame which is dumb whereas Amber killed DEWEY and was influenced by Richie (she was the main killer) and almost killed Sidney and gale
Amber slay for though she was my favorite ghostface😊
She killed 7 people
Richie is a horror fan so I don’t think thought the rest of the movies were trash. And supposedly Amber just wanted to be “ apart of something. ” Probably proving that Richie gaslighted and manipulated her into it.
Sure he did! There's no possible way Amber was the main killer. I'll be posting a video about it very soon...
He def did
Erm no scream 4 wasn’t a bad movie. It was a great film.
Scream 4 was brilliant and worth of my time and money, something Scream 5 just could never.
@@v2productions936 cope
@@kels154 Cry
@@v2productions936 why would i cry when ur the one with a shitty ass opinion 🤣
SCRE4M was ahead of it's time. Wes Craven predicted everything that's happening today in terms of main stream social media. SCRE4M deserves more love.
I still think jill should have got away with it
Scream 4 was the 3rd best scream movie and honestly Jill was one of my favs
Which ones are the first two better Scream movies then?
@@v2productions936 Scream 5 and Scream
@@tgabz I did not ask you, but good to know how wrong you are. Thanks for absolutely nothing.
@@v2productions936 i answered anyways, and i'll keep doing it, and i'm right, you're wrong. you're welcome.
@@tgabz scream 5 isn't that good,sorry
But those two did do something no other ghostface has done and that when amber killed Dewey
I love scream movies and just seen 6 last night. Definitely my third favorite. I’d say Scream 3 still hold number in my heart though. It’s just something about it I love. I think Roman was one of the best ghost faces. And to find out he the reason scream 1 basically started is also a fun fact for me.
I love Roman's reveal and how he and Sidney acts both like siblings fighting each other for stupid reasons, even though Roman was abandoned by his own mother and all he wanted was to be loved and praised by others like Sidney did, and he was almost getting all of that had he just made the stupid Stab 3 movie.
Also, he had the biggest balls. Dude killed 9 people on his own, 10 if we ever consider Maureen Prescott as he claimed he was there when she was killed. I mean, I find it hard they'll ever make a single Ghostface Killer for a movie ever again...
@@v2productions936 this! And the one girl who was supposed to play Sidney in stab 3 was suppose to be an accomplice but I guess they threw that script away
The “motive” of each film revolves around current times during each respective film. For Scream 5 is “toxic fandom”, which is still very relevant.
Oh shut the fuck up. No one believed in that. And for what? For a shitty Star Wars director who couldn't had the balls to take the criticism of his horrible job just because he is white, rich and clearly untalented. They had the same excuse and mentioned him again in Scream 6 and that movie barely had any meta reference. What is the so called "resolution revolving around the current time" for Scream 6?
Also, don't think that Matt and Tyler's pathetic attempt of directing the new Scream Movies makes them as good or talented as Wes Craven's geniusness. They payed for the rights of the franchise, great deal, anyone with money could do that. But whatever other director and team of screenwritters could had done a much better job. Take Aaron Martin for instance who has made 5 seasons of a Slasher far more interesting then the two Scream Movies made by these two.
@@v2productions936the Star Wars director fiasco is the reason they made him the director of Stab 8. That is precisely the criticism behind it. Despite being a weaker motive compared to previous films, toxic fandom is very relevant, as I previously mentioned. People but Sam portrayal under the mud (I was one of those people) and a lot of her lines on Scream 6 were a response to that backlash.
About Slasher, I’ve only been able to watch the first 2 seasons and I enjoyed them a lot.
@@valhalax25don't listen to this guy he is very toxic he is abusinge everyone who is speaking bad against scream 4
The Fact You Are From The Same Country Of I(Brazil) Just Make Me Proud Lol
Se é BR, fale BR irmão, tá tudo bem KAKAKA
@@v2productions936 Kkakskakskskskskskska
Agora entendi pq vc tava metendo nos gringos
Jill:u pls couldn't kill ur cast
Amber:at least I didn't die by the word clear
Then why would Amber try so hard to steal/copy Jill's lines?
Frrrr! Like Scream 5 is INCREDIBLE, don’t get me wrong, but the motives were the dummest of them all. Like as dumb as Charlie, Jason, and Greg’s
U need to do one for Billy and Stu
Strength and agility Amber
But Jill didn't kill her cast either...
She certainly killed more than Amber did, and they did kill the entire teen cast who were the new gen for that movie, hence why the comment.
v2produtions936 I mean that is true they couldn’t even kill chad, mindy, Sam or Tara and they continued on to scream six that’s practically the first movie in the scream franchise for any of the friends from the friend group survives besides Sidney or randy
Amber was the main 🤦♀️🤦♀️
Yes she was so the main that she is just as forgettable in Scream 6 as Charlie and Mickey are in their respective movies.
But sure she was the main. In your dreams, of course.
Happy to have found this again
Mickey:legend
Billy:original goat
Stu:purple guy og
Roman:”i am roman bridger the director”
Amber is the main though, Richie got like one kill if that, Amber killed Dewey, Wes and probably Judy, the security guard at the hospital, Liv, plus more ppl im probably forgetting
That doesn't mean she is the main killer. The main killer never kills the most. The main killer lets the secondary killer do more kills because the police will always have more evidence against them. Stu, Mickey, Charlie, Kieran and Jay also killed the most and they are not the main killers regardless.
Even VI admits she’s the main killer, she came up for one last scare, main killers do that, not sub killers. Main killers are also the big shock reveal. Richie’s was just a ‘oh so their doing the evil bf thing again’
So all of the main killers go like this
Billy
Miss Loomis
Roman
Jill
Amber
Bailey
@@eclipez5653 Scream 6 focus on Richie, not Amber. So what she came for a last scare? Mickey also did and he wasn't the main killer. And the so called 'big shock reveal' is not what makes them main killers. Plotwise, it also makes no sense for Amber to be the main, given how pathetically manipulated and groomed she was by Richie. LAst but not least, in Scream 6's killer wall with all the killers from the movies, Richie is the one even with the bigger photo compared to Amber's, just like Billy has the bigger photo compared to Stu's. And in the Scream 5 poster, Richie also occupies more space than Amber, just like Bailey occupies more space in Scream 6's poster, compared to his two kids.
@@eclipez5653 I'm not saying this, for instance, because I like/care more about Richie. He certainly was a terrible main killer, and a very boring character at that. But it is undeniable that he was the main one, just like his father was. Next killer in Scream 7 will probably be Richie's mother or Bailey's father...
I get that she WAS groomed by him, but she also manipulated him. Radio silence has said that ‘Richie thinks he’s the main man, but really it’s Amber pulling the string’
Aawww I fucking love them I love them
she killed dewey
So the fuck what?
@@v2productions936 so "you couldn't even kill your own cast' falls short, she killed like 4 ppl one of them being dewey fucking riley
@@olusko7541 "Her own cast" means she couldn't kill the teens, whereas Jill and Charlie literally killed the entire Teen cast in their movie, let alone a bunch of adults too.
Also, Dewey's death was pathetic and poorly written.
@@v2productions936 amber has more kills under her belt, and way more entertaining ones
@@olusko7541 Who cares? She was not main, like I said, and the entire next entry is about Richie. Every secondary killer has more kills, just like I've already explained in previous comments.
Jill: So, let me get this straight? I had a CLEAR GOAL of becoming famous, and y’all are telling me that you both killed people because you *didn’t like a movie?* I’m sorry, that’s pretty pathetic. Funny, but pathetic
Richie and Amber: NO!! It was NOT just a movie! It was Stab 8! And it PISSED ON OUR CHILDHOODS! So, our movie was gonna be so much better than Rian Johnson’s! We’re the true fans!
Jill: LOL, this is getting ridiculous
Charlie: Well, I kind of get them
Jill: Shut up, Charlie. No one cares about you
Billy: Ooh, y’all are so dead to me. Y’all stay away from my daughter😡
Mrs. Loomis: My adorable son is right, you did NOT have to go after my ADORABLE granddaughter like that!
Billy: Mom, YOU abandoned me in the first place, which is why Stu and I became who we were. And then suddenly after I was killed, you cared?!
Mrs. Loomis: I’m so sorry son!😭😭I’m trying to do better!
Billy: It’s okay, Mom. But it’s not about us right now, it’s about how these two new morons tried to kill my adorable little girl! Over a stupid movie made about my life story!
Richie and Amber: *IT IS NOT JUST A MOVIE!!!!*
Stu: LOL, I am loving this so much!🤪🤪
Mickey: Yeah, this showdown is going to *ROCK!*
Roman: My God, what have I done? I started this whole thing🤦♂️🤦♂️
The fact how you wrapped this up completely is perfect
Lolol amber is the main killer! And she did what no killer before her managed to do! Killed one of the OG3. Put some respect on her name.
To be fair Jill didn’t want to kill any of the main 3 besides Sid. But Sidney is unkillable lol. And Jill was the closest to getting away with it
Who cares?
She didn't even came close to achieve her pathetic nonsense goal, whereas Jill not only managed to achieve hers before she died, she also managed to make the so called movie that no one will ever heard about comming from pathetic Richie and Amber.
Richie and Amber, doing all of that for a shitty movie sequel no one will ever heard about.
Jill, making the damn sequel exist by itself and be seen as the final girl she always dreamed to be once.
@@huntergosselin4975 Right! Sidney was not killed by a gunshot in the head solely because, had she done that, none of these Amber Fans would have liked it, and they'd be crying out loud up to this day that someone killed the main protagonist. Also, Sidney is clearly protected by Plot Armor, so these pathetics excusés are a waste of time...
Mrs. Loomis killed Randy?
Exactly like how are they calling Jill better? AMBER BROUGHT BACK THE ORIGINAL HOUSE, killed Dewey and killed Judy.
Amber was the main
Sorry to inform you this, but she wasn't.
Aside from Billy, every Main Killer was revealed after the Side Killer. Not to mention how both Billy and Stu revealed themselves pretty much together at the same time, while Richie tried hard to pretend he was impressed/scared of Amber after she shot Liv.
@@v2productions936 duh I’m saying she did most of the kills hence main killer she was obviously the mastermind
@@randomguy1964 That is exactly why she wasn't either mastermind nor main killer. Both Stu, Mickey and Charlie have also killed the most in each of their respective movies, and they were not main killers exactly because of that, since the Main Killer of each movie (Billy, Mrs. Loomis and Jill) would eventually betray their partner in the end, either in case they got caught by the police so they'd sell out their partner so they could be seen as sole survivors or because they would just simply think their partner was disposable.
@@randomguy1964 Also, the same happens to the TV series. Piper was the main killer and died first, while Kieran was supposed to reveal himself afterwards but he didn't. He eventually outnumbered Piper's kill with all of his victims from Season 2, but he was still not the main killer since the whole show was surrounded by Brandon James and Piper was his daughter. And, in Season 3 (Scream Resurrection), Beth was the Main Killer and she did not kill most of the victims, and she also betrayed her partner Jay who had killed the most to prove her his loyalty and service.
That is exactly why Amber was neither mastermind nor main killer.
@@randomguy1964 But it's completely understandable why people would mix them and think Amber was the main killer, since this new movie didn't make any of it's killers have a personal motive to go on a killing spree.
jill didn't even have a motive
She did but I didn't really like her motive tho
@@nateblanch5045 She did had a motive which was a great prediction of how the Gen Y generation reacts towards fame and what they are willing to do to achieve it.
And Jill's motive is perfect, she wants to be the new victim, how come you people say she didn't had a motive?
@@v2productions936 yeah I never thought of it that way scream 4 is my favorite I just don't like Jill's motive I mean it's alright I have seen better tho
@@nateblanch5045 I mean, it's better than this new movie where the motive is a revenge plot for a character in 5 and Scream 6 didn't ever tried to explain the plothole in the movie - it just sortta "happened to them". Even Mrs. Loomis motive was a revenge, but she had consistancy and she created an actual plan: Pay a killer, put the blame on him, make him kill most if not all the victims while she'd just help him with phone calls and telling him orders, create a fake name, etc (Jesus, Scream 6 says her first name is Nancy when Nancy was a fake name so she could pass on as a reporter at the college).
Amber was the main for sure
Sorry to break it to you, she wasn't.
@@v2productions936 she was directors already confirmed she was
@@LanaDelReySupremacy No, this was not confirmed by the director. She was the side Killer, Richie is the main one. Both of the killers didn't have any personal motive, they were both movie fans. Richie was the second one to be revealed, and he was the one crying his motives and telling Amber what to do, given how he ordered her to go search for Tara.
@@LanaDelReySupremacy Which is pointless, both of them were horrible at their job.
@@v2productions936 you’re confusing richie with charlie. Secondly. richie was the Mastermind behind it but not the Main killer. It’s in the name “KILLER”
Please please make one when Roman meet Jill
omg you cray! I can imagine this lmao
I love all of them
Nobody is better then the originally
If I am correct amber did most of the killings
So did Stu, Mickey, Charlie, Kieran and Jay and they were all secondary killers. That does not mean Amber was the main killer, if anything it also helps to prove she was the secondary one.
Also, watch this:
ruclips.net/user/shortsOpNTzFdde-o
This is so funny
Jill roberts movie best
Yaaasss😂😂😂
deadass crying .😭😭😭
Amber would easy kill Jill
Amber G O A T
In they meet herJil
And Charlie old movie but amber and were the new movie
B**** please u couldn't even kill her own cast got me laughing on the floor 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
not jill acting like she didn’t only have 2 kills
Both Jill and Charlie had 5 kills each, where Charlie killed 5 victims (Marnie, Jenny, Olivia, Rebecca and Robbie - Plus the attack on Kirby), and Jill killed 4 victims (Hoss, Perknis, Kate and Trevor) and Charlie. Either way, they killed their entire teen cast on the movie, differently from Scream 5 that killed 2 extras, 2 sides and a legacy, or the Scream 6 in which they killed literally just extras.
@@v2productions936Hoss, Perkins E A Kate Foram O Charlie
No Total
Charlie Matou 9
Jill Matou 2
@@matcontentworld3165 Como que o Charlie matou Ross, Perkins e Kate se ele estava no Facadatona com o Robbie e, saindo de lá, ele foi direto pra casa da Kirby? A Kirby foi se encontrar com a Jill somente depois da Jill matar os 3, no qual o grupo dos jovens foram todos se juntar na Kirby. É impossível, e ainda mais iógico, dizer que a Jill e o Charlie trocaram de lugar (Jill esfaquear a Gale e Charlie matar os 3), porque cada um deles já estava ao lado das respectivas vítimas para os ataques.
E mais, a Jill pegar a arma dos policiais com o Charlie não é um argumento plausível. Ela mesma poderia ter entregado a arma pra ele durante o momento que ambos saem da sala, justamente porque o Charlie estaria fantasiado de Ghostface, e usar a arma como último recurso para impedir quem tentasse fugir. E o mesmo momento da Jill passar a arma para o Charlie antes dele devolver a arma pra ela explicaria como a Jill sabia exatamente aonde a Gale foi atacada. Em 5s fora de cena eles poderiam fazer isso.
Jill and Charlie actually didn’t get a movie
So before. I start good vid but amber will beat jill roberts but its very close and amber is the main killer watch the movie she almost killed the cast im not just saying but she actually is while riche kirsch was the one playing mind games and also amber and 6 kills while. Riche had like 1 also another thing scream 5 and 6 base off scream 1 and 2
Yeah, and so did Mickey who killed the most in Scream 2, but he was not the main killer. Mrs. Loomis was, because she hired him. Same deal with Richie, he manipulated Amber into committing the murders because she was gonna be blamed by the crimes. "Let the cops search for the possible second killer. Debbie Sault doesn't even exist...", well, what if most of the killers was committed by one person only (Amber), would anyone ever suspect she had a partner? Roman didn't had one...
Amber can’t beat Jill tho.
Tbh I don’t hate the film but at the same time I dislike how they made it sound like the sequels inferior to the original *it was like the sequel didn’t matter or weren’t relevant to the first*
*like I get most sequel/remakes films aren’t good as the original but at least they don’t erase the continuity or the plot of the original*
This is why I have a soft spot for scream 4 because they explain that scream four was remake but they did not erase the continuity of the orginal
But one thing that confuse me Is if scream 5 a sequel or a reboot because they’re not mentioning any character from other previous films but for some reason they mention Kirby as a Easter egg or proof that she is alive
It’s either a reboot or sequel because you can’t have both because it’s too confusing to follow the timeline because you need to at least acknowledge the other character of the other films because the character Roman was technically the original killer because he orchestrated everything from the start
But considering the plot of this movie was about the Franchise of in movie stab you think they’ve told the film in the style of the film wes craven did with nightmare on elm street. You know wes craven “new nightmare”
Honsetly the only thing I’m looking forward of this films are the memes either making fun of this film or those incorrect quote thing people do on wattpad or tumblr *my favorite is when people do multiple reference on the park and reaction “who broke it” and “the codenames eagle one”
"I dislike how they made it sound like the sequels inferior to the original"
That's the point. You said it all.
"like I get most sequel/remakes films aren’t good as the original but at least they don’t erase the continuity or the plot of the original" Exactly, and that's exactly how Matt and Tyler had directed this 5th movie. They made it look like Roman (Scream 3) didn't matter nor had existed, that Jill and Charlie (Scream 4) didn't already do what Richie and Amber were trying to achieve and lots of other shitty comments just diminishing, shaming and belittling the other Scream sequels (Plus, Jill and Charlie had filmed and posted their kills online. It's on the internet. People still do have those videos saved somewhere, and Stab fans *knows* it was them who had made those videos and posted online)...
"This is why I have a soft spot for scream 4 because they explain that scream four was remake but they did not erase the continuity of the orginal" nor they had taken continuity of the other sequels itself, or had criticized them. The movie itself had criticized the Remakes in the Movie Industry and History itself, it wasn't a hard punch tbt like Scream 5 did of some sarcastic evil note like "Look how damn bad I was in these old pics".
"It’s either a reboot or sequel because you can’t have both because it’s too confusing to follow the timeline" They had created the term "requel" which isn't even a thing, hence why you're confused. Hence why the movie was shit. Because if requel were to be a thing, then *Scream 4 was already a requel 11 years ago - created by Wes Craven himself.*
It's such a shame I got a job after I made those videos, I was going to make other three more about exactly what you've pointed on your comment, but I couldn't manage to have time to make them... Soon, I'll be making more of these. I mean, sadly Scream 6 is comming and it's going to be even worse then 5 solely because it won't have Neve Campbell, so...
@@v2productions936 I actually heard that neve is coming back
But on the subject of the word requel, i did look up the word and believe that there certain that work well being a requel and there some that don’t work well
I don’t have anything against remakes but I just notice I started to dislike whenever they do remake of certain movie *coughing Disney live action remakes*
And because of that, this cause Me to dislike remakes unless it done right
Like they do everything to tell the plot in a new way but they change things that made most of us love the original.
I don’t like how they put little effort on remakes to try to surpass the original or be as unique
every time they have speaking dialogue in the new one, they always seem monotone and robotic. It like they either have no or show emotion telling us what they feeling
*although there are a few remakes they did really well. Like 101 Dalmatian with glen close (God I love how fun she had to act like cruella), homeward bound the incredible journey, hairspray (this is the only because they manage to get John trovolta to dress as the mom and I love it), maleficent*
And I can’t stand the new Star Wars movie because they made Rey too much of Mary Sue and was way too prefect in everything *there a reason why people gravitate toward leia and Luke because both were strong character who never back down in the presence of evil and the fact she was already a leader in the beginning of the fourth movie and the fact both finding out who their father were was the biggest plot twist of the movie then you see them doing it again in movie 9 and it’s like meh because you see them bring back palpatine and I’m like “why? And how?” Because they tell in the opening of movie 9 instead of the ending credits of movie 8. I hate how Disney made the book of stars wars legend not canon to the universe of star wars*
People dont realise that jill was not even a ghostface. Charlie did all the work. Jill was just the brains.
She killed 4 victims and planned everything. She literally wears the mask and do the unmask reveal. She filmed and posted the victims deaths online like a snuff film. She cheated on her partner and killed him. She had a personal motive and was not even related to revenge like the rest 90% of the killers in the entire franchise. She was the main killer in her movie.
How the fuck would she not be considered as a Ghostface. If any of them was not the Ghostface was Ethan and pathetic fucking coward Richie.
Julie said that she is going SCRE4M😭 and then your mom text
And she's just expecting the call from your dead beat daddy.
I think other ghostface killers who are broken must be in heaven and the others are pure evil go to hell but charlie is influenced so I think he went to heaven
And me as well wtf hey hey hey
Lol amber was the main
And again, she wasn't.
You north amaricans tries your hardest to make Amber awesome but she just floped the entire shitshow called Scream 5.
amber was just the main killer, like charlie was. jill and ritchie were the masterminds with the least amount of kills
Spoiler warning don’t look down if u don’t want a spoiler
Quinn, Bailey and Ethan meeting Richie and amber 😂
OH FUCK! The entire Kirsh family meeting each other in hell, wtf! At this point when Scream 7 releases, they'lll probably put Richie's mom as the main killer and the second killer will probably be Tara's father who wants to murder Sam and her mother for making him think he was Sam's dad all those years...
BRO WTH I THOUGHT IT WAS A SPOILER FOR SCREAM 4&5 not 6.BRO YOU COULD ATLEAST SAID SPOILER FOR SCREAM 6
@@camiliawinburn7991 Couldn't care less for your Scream 6 spoiler. Deal with it.
Is Jill not still alive?
She was very much donzo
@@deathmetal271 I'm just thinking she wasn't shot in the head
Jill died in a hospital gown not that shirt
And who the fuck cares about which dress she died in, she is in hell...
Why not put Charlie in?😂
Background is so trash 😂
Not worse than your profile 😂😂😂
Wait, i thought Amber was the main killer😰
Well, she isn't:
ruclips.net/user/shortsOpNTzFdde-o?feature=share
She is
@@r0ckym4rtin She isn't
@@v2productions936she is but Richie was the mastermind
richie wasnt the main killer but slay
Yeah right, as if:
ruclips.net/user/shortsOpNTzFdde-o
Keep on trying, Amber fan
@@v2productions936 stay in denial Richie apologist
Amber actually did more than Richie
Hence why she is not the main killer, but the secondary one. This is even proved in S6 where they focus mostly on Richie than on Amber...
@@v2productions936 it was only based for Richie because his family was enraged he was killed 💀 Amber doing more doesn't prove anything about Richie being the main killer and makes me suspect Amber was the main.
@@owenjayes Again... Hence why she was the secondary one. Same way Mrs. Loomis is the main killer in S2, because she payed for Mickey to do mostly all the killings while she helped Mickey and ordered Mickey into what he had to do, so the police had more evidence against him, Mrs. Loomis was doing all of that to revenge Billy, the main killer in S1. If the entire Ghostface Reveal and motivation was to revenge Richie, he was the main killer in S5.
@@owenjayes Also, that's not the only proof there is:
- Richie killed the least (As every Main Killer has always done in previous movies with Double Ghostface Killers);
- Richie manipulated and groomed Amber into doing things for him. She was 16/17 while he was 25/26;
- Richie was about to betray on Amber back in the hospital because he never tried to stop Dewey from shooting Amber - and Gale's phone call was not part of their plan, so had Amber got killed right then and there, Richie would still carry the plan to kill the rest of the characters himself and/or find another person to manipulate to help him - like every main killer was gonna betray their partners in previous movies (Billy, Mrs. Loomis and Jill);
- Richie was ordering Amber in the final act;
- Of all the killers, Richie is the main focus for S6 and most likely will have more connection related to him in S7;
- His character is even the one that ocuppies more space in Posters for S5, while Amber didn't...
It's too much proof in and out of the movie itself. You may like Amber more, like I prefer Stu more than Billy, but she was not the main killer.
@@v2productions936 Richie may be the main but Amber did more. And that hospital betrayal is nonsense. He literally tried to stop Dewey from shooting her in the head
😂😂😂😂😂💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
tbh i think amber was the main killer
she had the convos and set ups planned out along with having more kills and yall can debate she had less kills but she confirmed killed more important characters like dewey. yall cant be serious saying richies the main one
Killing more important characters does not mean she is the main killer. Killing more never meant once in the slasher genre that the character is the Main Killer (See Slasher Solstice, Scream Queens, Harper's Island, etc in which none of those the main killer aka the brain head of the crimes were the ones to kill more).
You thinking Amber was the main killer is a very solid opinion in your brain dead world, but if a psycopath plans an entire murder spree, the idea of this killer just letting his evidence be all around the crime scene is stupid. They need someone to be at fault. And if not the main girl/protagonist, it needs to be their partner. But Richie's plan to blame Sam could not and would not ever worked out. Blamming Amber would be much easier, given how her evidence was always there. She was manipulated by an older men. He tried to put the blame on her once and almost let her die in the hospital scene. The directors did an interview in which they said *Richie did not want to dirty his hands,* not that he would never dirt his hands. Amber is the secondary killer (And that does not mean she is not better than Richie, because he sucks a lot).
Richie and Amber both main killer and They teammates kill everyone.
😂
Just stop and block your video like wtf are this video like amber and jill and rich is literally a fake dat
They actually didn’t make a movie on Jill and Charlie
Stab 8 is kinda like it. It obviously doesn't say their names nor follow Sidney's storyline again because she threatened the studios in case they ever used her name again and so on and so forth... But, if you think about it, Scream 4 was the only movie to have low Box Office with it's release, despite it's great story and characters. It was the only movie to be taken as "very bad" along with Scream 3. So yeah, it's too far off that they wrote Stab 8 t be the worst movie in the new trilogy, because Scream 4 was "the worst" movie for box office. Hence why I wrote that line for the video. Hence why they made an entire movie and killer motive for the killers based into making a new movie, a better one. One that wasn't a "bullshit, cash in, run in the mill" sequel...
@@v2productions936Since Scream 4 Was Like An Stab Movie Remake.
Why Not Just
Stab Remake Instead Of Stab 8?
@@matcontentworld3165 Scream 4 was critique to Remake Movies, but it was not an actual remake itself. They could had addressed it in Scream 5, but didn't, so the blame is on them. But more importantly, I don't think Wes Craven would ever reboot the movies/characters himself. They were too precious for him.
@@v2productions936 I Have Sure He Didnt Actually Remake It
Jill And Charlie Wanted To Remake Stab 1
And Not Make An Sequence
But Scream 4 Is An Actual Sequence
@@matcontentworld3165 Like I said, what the characters wanted in that movie *is* a critique to "Remake" itself. It's basically a middle finger to the hollywood industry back in the day of only making Movie Remakes. But Scream 4 wasn't a remake itself. Hence why Jill and Charlie's plan was not gonna work. Hence why they put a line in Sidney's character as *"Don't fuck with the original"* if you're going to do a remake, which is what they would mostly do, by breaking rules, changing characters and so on and so forth.
But, in Scream 5, Richie wanted to make a sequel, but based within the origins of the story, bringing back legacy characters such as Sidney's character into the sequel they wanted Hollywood to make... This by itself is a remake, and not such a thing as """requel""" because """requel""" does not exist. Because you already have a "Remaster" which is when you just upgrade the same thing to better graphics, you have the "Remakes" which is when you bring the same content but with slightly different changes in it's mechanics and they are usually also upgraded to better graphics and they all still lead to the same story, arcs and conclusion and last but not least when you bring back a franchise that was considered "over" for 10 years (Which is not even true because we had the TV Series approved by Wes Craven himself before he passed away) and you try to force a continuation out of it, you're doing a *"Revival"* of the franchise, but not a """Requel""".
Requel is a word created solely for that movie. Jurassic Park new movies are not "requels", they are Revivals. iCarly's new seasons are not "requels", they are revivals. Requel was a pile of garbage the directors created because they wanted to feel smart, but just couldn't. This, in itself, is fucking up the original. The fact that Neve Campbell was not gonna be well paid for Scream 6 is fucking up the original.
I completely agree!!!! This is so fucking great this movie was so awful sorry!
"Richie is the main killer"
Me: BUT THAT M*****FCK** KILLED NOTHING COMPARED TO AMBER!
Neither did Billy, Mrs. Loomis, Jill, Piper and Beth from Scream franchise. The Main Killer is not the one who kills the most in Slashers. In the TV series Slasher Solstice (Season 3), the main killer is also the one who didn't kill the most. In Harper's Island is the same deal, the Main Killer was also the one who pulled down the strings and had planned everything.
Richie manipulated, groomed and ordered Amber to do most of the stuff. He killed a cop and that was that. Regardless, he is the main killer.
@@v2productions936 ok,thanks. I didnt watch the series
@@gaby56469richie killed 3 people
My favorite 4 ghostfaces is
1.Billy
2.Jill
3.Roman
4.Mickey
What are your favorites
I'd say, in order (For now):
1. Jill
2. Billy
3. Stu
4. Roman
5. Mrs. Loomis
But I keep on changing my list because sometimes I keep asking myself how pathetic Billy is for doing what he did because his mother left him (and how it makes no sense for Sidney to be the one he wants to blame for), or how many kills each one of them had throught the franchise (For exemple, Mrs. Loomis killed the least in all of them, mostly because she payed Mickey to do the killings, and her plan was top notch very well constructed, I'd up her on the list), so for now that's how my list goes.
If we ever consider the TV series killers, I'd say my top 5 is:
1. Jill
2. Billy
3. Piper
4. Stu
5. Beth
I feel like they could have made Richie better
I feel like nah it was mmh Amber was the main killer
Amber was not the main killer.
She was groomed by Richie, she killed most victims and did most of the attacks (meaning Richie had more evidence to pin her down as the only killer), she was pratically betrayed by Richie at the hospital (And every main killer betrays their partner, and Gale's phone call to Dewey wasn't in the killer's plan and Richie was willing to let Amber get shot in the head) and Richie was ordering her by the end of the movie.
Amber:but you couldn’t kill dewy
She didn't even tried nor wanted to because the whole "killing the legacy" was unnecessary, even for Amber and Richie's shitty plans.
thas cute but amber pops jill
PPPPPPFFFFF As if
Bruh he is and amber is the most likely to be the main character killer and amber also did most of the kills
Ugh
Still so fucking funny this movie was trash!
NAH HOW COME JILL IS TALKING THAT MUCH SMACK EVEN THOUGH AMBER DID ALL THE KILLING AND JILL LET CHARLIE DO MOST OF IT!!! AND SHE CANT EVEN KILL SHERIFF JUUUUTTTYYYYY AnD AMBER KILLED SOMEONE SHE COULDNT AND SHE KILLED DEWEY SOMETHING JILL COULDNT DO HAHHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!
Amber did all the killing, no one is denying that.
But she still was the secondary killer, the partner, the other one. The Main killer was Richie. And that doesn't mean I like Richie, but that's the undeniable truth, so deal with it.
@v2productions936richie killed 3 people
Scream 5 > Scream 4
Yeah, you keep believing in this delusion of yours. Here it is, the only Scream 5 fan.
@@v2productions936 it's not a delusion, it's a fact lmao.
@@tgabz If you truly believe in this delusion, it sure is a fact for you and you only
@@v2productions936 it's a fact for everybody, but you, apparently
@@tgabz Nope, not everybody is as sick of the head as you are, sorry. Most people have better taste in media then you could possibly ever comprehend. Plus, last time I checked, the Scream 5 movie has the same rating as Scream 4 on IMDb, proving how the so called "Success" from the movie was a huge facade.
LIE AMBER IS THE MAIN KILLER NOT RICHIE
Amber was the main
She wasn't honey... She just wasn't.